Unitary representations of fundamental groups and the spectrum of twisted Laplacians

Unitary representations of fundamental groups and the spectrum of twisted Laplacians

UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL 129 GROUPS 53. THE INEQUALITY C&p, 1)’ j A,,(p) We fix a set A of generators universal covering manifol...

240KB Sizes 0 Downloads 16 Views

UNITARY

REPRESENTATIONS

OF FUNDAMENTAL

129

GROUPS

53. THE INEQUALITY C&p, 1)’ j A,,(p)

We fix a set A of generators universal

covering

manifold

of x1(M), and let 9 c fi be a fundamental

fi. Given

a smooth

section

domain

in the

s of E,, we find

Thus we have

We shall prove

LEMMA 2. and s.

Proof. joining

s%

I(s(ol)-s(2)((2dx

I C

s2

We first note that s(aZ) - s(Z) =

1 and a~?. Thus, putting

Ildsl\2d-fx or some constant C not depending on c

ds, where E: [0, l] --t fi is a smooth path in 6l sP

c(t) = 63(?(t)), we have

s s 1

Ils(cJ5z)-s(~)(12 I

0

1

IIdsk(t) II2

0

II44 II2dt.

Without loss of generality, we may assume that M is orientable and CJis represented by a simple closed curve co in M. For each simple curve c:S’ -+ M, there exists an embedding F,:S’xD”-‘~MwithF(S’xO=c,wheren=dimM,andD”-’istheclosedunitdiscin IX”-‘. We put T, = F,(S’ x D”- ‘), which is a tubular neighborhood of the curve c. For each point x in M, we can find a curve cr: [0, l] + M without self-intersection such that c,(O) = x, {c,(l)} = c,(S’) nc,([O,

there exist finitely lift

of

satisfying

the closed

simple closed curve c, with c,(O) = x. Since M is compact

by a smooth

a

11). We then approximate

many

ci satisfying

curve c~.c~.c;~ and M = u TX, xeM

c1 = c,, , . . , cN = cxN such that M = fi Ti (K = TJ. Let Ei be i=l c”,(l) = oci(0), and let Fi: II3x D”-’ ---f2 be a lift of F,,

~il[O, l] x 0 = Ci. Put

z = F,([O, l] x D”-l).

We may assume

that

9 c

6

c

i=l

since M = 6

T, and find

i=l

s 54

Ils(o.%-s(5Z)))2d.2 I

2

i=l

SC2 i=l

s F,

1)s(a52)- s(2) I]2dZ

ssT,

1 IIds(c,W II’ dt dx, 0

where we have put c,(t) = F(s + t, y) (F = Fci, and x = F(s, y)). We write dx =.f(s, y) dsd”- ly,

130

Toshikazu Sunada

where ds and d”-‘y II d~(c,W))

are the Lebesgue densities on S’ and D”-‘. Thus II2 dtdx

= s

D”-’ ssSL S’

I (maxf) = (maxf)

IIW’(s

+

s Ljn-1sss1 ,$I s D”-I s SI

t,

Y) II2 dtf(s,

y) dsdy”- I,

lJds(F(s+t))(12dtdsdy”-’

ll~~~~(~,y)/12~~~y”-1

Ilds(F(s,~)ll~f(~,y)dsdy”-~ = C

s TX

IldSl12dx,

so that

s 9

Ils(oZ) - s(n) I(2d2 < C

IIdsl12dx

This completes the proof. Remark. In case of finite dimensional representations, the estimate C&p, Q)2I A,(p) can be obtained by using the argument in S. Gallot [S]. In fact, for s E Cm(Ep), we have n

~AMlldsII* = (A,ds,

ds) - IIVds(12-

2

(ds(Riccie,), ds(e,)),

k=l

where (ek} is an orthonormal

basis of T’M (ds = d,s). In particular, if APs = Ao(p)s, then

+A,IIdsl12 < Clldsll* where C = sup,?,(p) + max I(Riccie, e)l, ecTM P llell = 1

so that AM/Ids/lI C’lldsjl for some constant depending only on M. According to [6], we have sup IIdsll* I C”

s

lldsl12,

from which the desired inequality follows easily.

$4. WEAK CONTAINMENT

AND SPECTRUM

Let G be a discrete group with a finite set A of generators, and p and p1 unitary representations of G on Hilbert spaces V and Vi respectively. We say that p is weakly contained in p1 and write p < pl, if for every positive E and every orthonormal set

UNITARY

{Vl, . . . >c’,f1 in

REPRESENTATIONS

OF FUNDAMENTAL

ICci3

P(a)vj>V-

131

set {ul, . . . , u,} in VI such that

V there exists an orthonormal

(*)

GROUPS

C”i3

Pl(a)Uj)VII

<

&3

where ~JE A. Remark

1. If p is a sub-representation

of pr, then p < pl.

Remurk 2. II < p if and only if S(Q, p) = 0. Indeed, IIp(4r - v/I2 = 2 -(
Spect(A,)

p and p1 he unitary

this comes from the equality:

v> + (P(cJ -‘)v, v>). representations

of nl(M).

If p < pl,

then

c Spect(A,,).

It is known that if G is amenable, then every representation is weakly contained infinite direct sum of the regular representation of G (see [13]), hence we have

in an

COROLLARY. Let 61: X -+ M be a normal covering with covering transformation group G. If G is amenable, then Spect(A,) c Spect(A,) for every unitary representation p of G. In particular, Spect(A,) c Spect(A,).

Proof qf Theorem 2. We retain the terminology in $2. Let 1”~ Spect(A,). We fix a complete orthonormal basis {ri >$ 1 of V. Let c:be an arbitrary small positive number. From the definition of spectrum, we may take s E CS(Ep) such that (lA,s - is 11i2 I E and I(sllL2= 1. We shall construct a section t E C”(E,,) such that llb,, t - l.tl/i, I CE and litljLz 2 C’ > 0 for constitute some constants C and C’ not depending on E. Since {s(x)} wEg and {@;ds(x)},,~ compact sets in V, applying the BanachhSteinhaus theorem, we can select an integer n such that, for all vector v of the form s(x) or dq;ds(x). 2 u-

i;

/I

/I v -

Take an orthonormal the constant section

We then find, on x E 6,

we have

I

Vi)Vi

&

i=l 2

t

(v,

(TVi)cmi

i=l

II I

E.

set {ui}l= 1 in VI satisfying (*). For each vi (resp. ui), let sia (resp. ti,) be of E, (resp. Epl) on L?, defined in the same way as in $2, and put t(x)

Obviously

(v,

=

1 a

cPatx)C

(s(x), I

sia(x)>tia(x).

132

Toshikazu Sunada

Using the equality

II$(

v, cwi)cmi -

i

(v, Vi)Ui

i=l

I2=IIT’ +

2

V,

II

are not greater

-C

Vi)Vi

I

/I

i,j

)/

and

Ilda.(F((&

Sia)tia-(b

Sib)tib))li

(i

than 2sup lA(pB1’&+ 2/)s(12&and 2sup I(&, )(‘E + 2Ildsll’~ respectively.

here that (jds(l& I (IAs(jL2 (Is(IL2I &l/2 + I, so that not depending on E. On the other hand, we have

JILlI

(V,

2Rex (- (au,, Uj)X

ACHEC((S,~i,)ti,-(S,Sib)tib)

we find that

~Vi)(TVi

=

jl


C

*

II

2

Note

((At - Atlj& I CE for some constant

11

~~~~

Si6)fi6//i

‘11

~~,S,((S,Sia)tib-(S,Sib)tib)

’ II

hence ijtll$>

+ - (+ + 3 vol(M))e 2 a (for sufficiently

Acknowledgements

-The

author

would like to acknowledge

small E). This completes

helpful conversations

with A. Kastuda

the proof.

and T. Adachi.

REFERENCES I. M. F. ATIYAH: Elliptic operators, Discrete groups and von Neumann algebra, A&risque 32-33 (1976), 43-72. 2. R. BROOKS: The fundamental group and the spectrum of the Laplacian, Comment. Math. Helvetici 56 (1981), 581-598. 3. R. BROOKS: Combinatorial problems in spectral geometry, in the Proceeding of the Taniguchi Symposium Curvature and topology of Riemannian manijolds 1985, Springer Lect. Note 1201, 14-32. 4. R. BROOKS: The spectral geometry of tower of coverings, J. 013 Geom. 23 (1986), 97-107. 5. M. BURGER: Estimation de petites valeurs propres du Laplacien d’un revetement de varittts Riemanniennes compactes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 302 (1986), 191-194. 6. J. CHEEGER: A lower bound for the smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian, in Gunning, Problem in Analysis, (1970), 195-199. 7. J. M. G. FELL: Weak containment and induced representations of groups, Can. J. Math. 14 (1962), 237-268. 8. S. GALLOT: A Sobolev inequality and some geometric applications, in Spectra ofRiemannian manifolds, Kaigai Publ. Tokyo, (1983), 45-55. 9. F. P. GREENLEAF: Invariant Means on Topological groups and Their Application, van Nostrand. Reinhold, (1969). 10. A. KAIXUDA and T. SLJNADA:Homology and closed geodesics in a compact Riemann surface, Amer. J. Math. (To appear). 11. D. A. KAZHDAN: Connection of the dual space of a group with the structure of its closed subgroups, Funct. Anal. Appl. 1 (1987), 63-65. 12. T. SUNADA: Number theoretic analogues in spectral geometry, in Proc. DD6. Shanghai, Springer Lect. Note. 13. R. J. ZIMMER: Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups, Birkhiuser, Boston (1984).

Department

of Mathematics

Nagoya

University

Nagoya

464

Japan