Urease: A highly biocompatible catalyst for switchable Biginelli reaction and synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines from the in situ formed ammonia Fatemeh Tamaddon, Somayeh Ghazi PII: DOI: Reference:
Please cite this article as: Fatemeh Tamaddon, Somayeh Ghazi, Urease: A highly biocompatible catalyst for switchable Biginelli reaction and synthesis of 1,4dihydropyridines from the in situ formed ammonia, Catalysis Communications (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.09.006
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
Urease: a highly biocompatible catalyst for switchable Biginelli reaction and synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines from the in situ formed ammonia Fatemeh Tamaddon, Somayeh Ghazi
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Yazd University, Yazd 89195-741, Iran Corresponding author: Fatemeh Tamaddon Department of Chemistry Faculty of Science Yazd University Yazd 89195-741 Iran Tel.: 00983531232666 1
Urea is a natural odorless source of nitrogen for synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines.
SC
Water-based reaction with urea and urease is highly biocompatible.
NU
Reactions give excellent yields of products without purification. Urease catalyzes Hantzsch reaction with urea in water more than NH4OAc.
MA
This enzymatic medium is reusable and inhibits by heavy metal cations. __________________________________________________
D
Abstract
TE
Urease is a superior biocompatible catalyst for switching from the Biginelli reaction to
AC CE P
urea-based synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines in water, where 100% switching occurs at 0.02 g/mL of enzyme. Hantzsch reaction with ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) is inefficiently catalyzed by urease (70%, 4 h), and heavy metal ions inhibit the ureasecatalyzed reactions with urea or NH4OAc. Promotion of the urea-based Hantzsch reaction by urease and its inhibition with Hg2+ supports specificity of urease for in situ generation of ammonia, whereas the role of urease in further transformations is not so specific. The features of this enzymatic method are reusability, mild reaction conditions, biocompatibility, generality, and high yield of products.
Because of their significant specificity in organic reactions, enzymes are the most promising catalysts for eco-environmental water-based biotransformations.1 Although
NU
very low loading of enzymes promotes various sequential reactions in living cells and
MA
biotechnological processes,2–4 immobilization of enzymes on solid supports improves their reusability, stability, activity, and resistance to chemical attack.5,6 Urease is a well-
D
known Ni-containing hydrolase enzyme7–9 that increases biochemical dissociation of urea
<>
AC CE P
TE
into ammonia by 1014 times (Scheme 1).
The natural sources of urease are soybean,10 Aspergillus niger PTCC5011,11 and Schizosaccharomyces pombe.12 Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are strategic for the production of complex molecules and growth of combinatorial chemistry.13–19 Hantzsch20 and Biginelli21 reactions are two common MCRs that produce 1,4-dihydropyridines (1,4-DHPs) and 3,4dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones (DHPMs) as calcium channel-stimulating drugs,22–29 in which the former have a structural connection with hydrogenase coenzymes.28 The similarity of components and catalysts in these reactions leads to the competitive formation of 1,4-DHPs in Biginelli’s experiments, where urea dissociates into ammonia.30–33
Recently,
we
have
reported
3
base-catalyzed29
and
shiftable
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Biginelli/Hantzsch reactions of nano-ZnO in water.30,31 Despite the promotion of these MCRs by acid–base catalysts,34 enzymatic biocompatible synthesis of 1,4-DHPs is still in
PT
demand. Because of the presence of a solid in the final stage,6 immobilization of urease
RI
on magnetic nanoparticles, monoliths, or smart polymers may become an alternative to
SC
further improve the implementation of this process (work in progress). Because urease was selected for the in-water dissociation of urea into ammonia,
NU
competition between enzymatic hydrolysis and condensation of urea was postulated to
MA
orient the Hantzsch/Biginelli reactions (Scheme 2).
D
<>
2.1. General
TE
2. Experimental
AC CE P
Infrared (IR), 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (500 MHz), and 13C NMR (125 MHz) spectra were recorded on Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer, Bruker Equinox 55, and Bruker AC 500, respectively. Urease (from jack bean) lyophilized 5 U/mg and art no 1.08489.0005 was purchased from Merck. 2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of 1,4-DHPs Urease (0.05 g) was added to a mixture of aldehyde (5 mmol), 1,3-dicarbonyl (5 mmol), and urea (15 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at 70 °C in water, till the product was precipitated. After completion of the reaction (thin-layer chromatography (TLC) monitoring, hexane:EtOAc (70:30)), cold water was added and the product was filtered to give the pure 1,4-DHP product. 2.3. Reusability of the reaction medium
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The practical reusability of the reaction medium after three further runs confirmed the unchanged activity of urease under reaction conditions (Figure 1).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In order to check the catalytic performance of urease and optimal conditions, the three-component reaction of urea (1), benzaldehyde (2), and ethyl acetoacetate (3) was
PT
screened as a Biginelli model reaction at various conditions and loadings of the urease
SC
<
>
RI
(Table 1).
On the basis of the results obtained, the pure Biginelli product was obtained in none of
NU
the cases, while the dissociation of urea into ammonia by urease led to the co-
MA
precipitation of product A with B in all reactions. A control experiment without urease under optimized conditions resulted in the formation of 35% of crude product, with 50%
D
selectivity for A (entry 16). This lower yield of A was due to the decrease of the
AC CE P
>70°C (entries 7–9).
TE
enzymatic dissociation of urea at <70°C (entries 13–15) or denaturation of urease at
In order to check the selectivity of the Biginelli/Hantzsch reactions, the percentages of A and B were determined by isolating them via dilution of the crude product with cold ethanol. Product A was separated by distillation of ethanol, and the remaining solid B was isolated by filtering. The shift of all established Biginelli reactions was accountable for various molar ratios of starting materials (entries 1–19) and 100% shift to 1,4-DHP occurred at 70°C with two moles of ethyl acetoacetate (entries 20–23).
Although changes in the amounts of urea and urease kinetically influenced on the reaction shift, at constant concentration of urease, the ratio of A to B increased with an increase of urea loading and in situ generation of ammonia (Figure 2).
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT <
>
PT
In addition, an increase in urease loading with excess urea led to an increase of in situ generation of ammonia, decrease of the reaction time, an increase in the Hantzsch
SC
RI
product, and A/B ratio (Figure 3). <
>
NU
Although 0.01 g of urease was the optimum amount of enzyme for maximum yield of
MA
A, the yield was constant at higher urease loadings (Figure 4). <
>
TE
D
A similar reaction with thiourea resulted in 30% yield of the Biginelli product, ethyl6-methyl-4-phenyl-2-thioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (C), after 12h
DHP (A).
AC CE P
(Scheme 3), which supported the substrate promiscuity of urease in the production of 1,4-
<>
In order to check the enzyme specificity of urea for only its dissociation or further tandem reactions, a blank four-component condensation of 2 mmol of ethyl acetoacetate, benzaldehyde, and ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) at 70°C with 0.01 g of urease in water was compared with an enzymatic alternative. The difference was not very significant, because the yields of A were 92% after 2.5 h and 70% after 4 h from the urease-catalyzed reaction and blank reaction, respectively. This supports the unspecific catalytic role of urease or weak catalytic role of its peptide residual8 in further steps of the Hantzsch reaction, in spite of its specificity in dissociation of urea by urease.
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Because of the noncompetitive inhibition of urease by heavy metal ions, the ureasecatalyzed Hantzsch reaction with urea was performed with trace amounts of Hg2+, Ag+,
PT
Cu2+, and Cd2+. On the basis of the yield of A, the observed order of urease inhibition
RI
was Hg2+>Ag+>Cu2+>Cd2+, with 0% of A for Hg2+ in either urea- or ammonium-based Hantzsch reaction (Table 2). This inhibition is due to the chelation of the metal cations
SC
with –SH groups of the cysteine in the active site of the urease.
MA
NU
<
>
According to the results, a plausible mechanism was considered, which initiates with
D
the in situ generation of ammonia and continues by urease-catalyzed enaminone
<>
AC CE P
TE
formation and condensation reactions to give the Hantzsch product (Scheme 4).
Urea is a very cheap, colorless, odorless, highly water-soluble, and nontoxic solid with LD50 15 g/kg for rat, which can be considered as an ammonia source rather than hygroscopic, odorous, and toxic ammonium salts. The generality of the urease-catalyzed and urea-based Hantzsch reaction was examined for various substrates to react with the in situ generated ammonia (Table 3). <
> Table 4 compares the advantages and performances of urease with other previously reported catalysts for the urea-based Hantzsch reaction.29,33 <
>
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The results obviously show that the urease-catalyzed synthesis of 1,4-DHPs in water is very simple and has a green access to produce a series of high-yield and pure drugs such
PT
as nifedipine (Table 2, entry 7). We expect this biotechnological method be suitable for
SC
RI
the diversity-oriented synthesis of 1,4-DHP drugs in a large scale.
4. Conclusion
NU
We have reported the first urease-catalyzed organic reaction, in which urease demonstrates a catalytic efficiency for the synthesis of 1,4-DHPs via either switched
MA
Biginelli or urea/ammonium-based Hantzsch reaction. Experimental evidences such as
D
inhibition tests and promotion of Hantzsch reaction with urea rather than ammonium salt
TE
confirm the promiscuous activity of urease for the in situ generation of ammonia. Biocompatibility of catalyst and conditions, recyclability of the reaction medium,
protocol.
AC CE P
operational simplicity, and high yield of products are the advantages of this enzymatic
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Yazd University. References 1. R. A. Copeland, Enzymes: A Practical Introduction to Structure, Mechanism, and Data Analysis, Wiley-VCH, Inc. 2d ed. 2000. 2. R. A. Harvey, D. R. Ferrier, Lippincott’s Illustrated Reviews: Biochemistry, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer business. 2011. 3. M. Mogharabi, M. A. Faramarzi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 356 (2014) 897-927.
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4. M. Heidary, M. Khoobi, S. Ghasemi, Z. Habibi, M. A. Faramarzi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 356 (2014) 1789-1794.
RI
6. M. N. Gupta, Eur. J. Biochem. 203 (1992) 25-32.
PT
5. R. A. Sheldon, S. Van Pelt, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 6223-6235.
7. M. Muller, Adv. Synth. Catal. 354 (2011) 3161-3174.
SC
8. R. C. Rodrigues, A. B. Murcia, R. F. Lafuente, Adv. Synth. Catal. 353 (2011)
NU
2216-2238.
9. P. A. Karplus, M. A. Pearson, R. P. Hausinger, Acc. Chem. Res. 30 (1997) 330-
MA
337.
10. J. C. Polacco, E. A. Havir, J. Biol. Chem. 254 (1979) 1707-1715.
TE
D
11. P. Smith, J. R. King, N. Goodman, J. Gen. Microbiol. 139 (1993) 957-962. 12. M. W. Lubbers, S. B. Rodriguez, N. K. Honey, R. J. Thornton, Can. J. Microbiol.
AC CE P
42 (1996) 132-140.
13. Y. Gu, Green Chem. 14 (2012) 2091-2128. 14. F. Tamaddon, M. Farahi, B. Karami, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 356 (2012) 85-89. 15. F. Tamaddon, M. Farahi, Synlett. 23 (2012) 1379-1383. 16. F. Tamaddon, F. Amirpoor, Synlett. 24 (2013) 1791-1794. 17. F. Tamaddon, M. Alizadeh, Tetrahedron Lett. 55 (2014) 3588-3591. 18. F. Tamaddon, F. Pouramini, Synlett. 25 (2014) 1127-1131. 19. G. Giorgi, M. F. A. Adamo, F. Ponticellia, A. Ventura, Org. Biomol. Chem. 8 (2010) 5339-5344. 20. A. Hantzsch, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 14 (1881) 1637-1638. 21. P. Biginelli, Gazz. Chim. Ital. 23 (1893) 360-416.
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 22. O. D'Alessandro, Á. G. Sathicq, J. E. Sambeth, H. J. Thomas, G. P. Romanelli, Catal. Commun. 60 (2015) 65-69.
PT
23. Z.-B. Xie, N. Wang, W. - X. Wu, X. Le, G. ZH., X. -Q. Yu, J. Biotechnol. 170
RI
(2014) 1-5.
24. A. Rajack, K. Yuvarajua, Ch. Praveena, Y. L. N. Murthy, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
SC
370 (2013) 197-204.
NU
25. A. Pramanik, M. Saha, S. Bhar, J. Org. Chem. 2012 (2012) 1-7. 26. S. D. Salim, K. G. Akamanchi, Catal. Commun. 12 (2011) 1153–1156.
MA
27. K. Elumalai, M. Ashraf Ali, M. Elumalai, K. Eluri, Sivanesvari, Rajeshwer, S. K. Mohanthi, P. Kalerul, V. Murthy, Durraivel, J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 4 (2012) 3139-
TE
D
3143.
28. D. L. Nelson, M. M. Cox, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, W. H. Freeman
AC CE P
& Company. 2004.
29. F. Tamaddon, Z. Razmi, A. A. Jafari, Tetrahedron Lett. 51 (2010) 1187-1189. 30. F. Tamaddon, S. Moradi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2013, 370, 117-122. 31. F. Tamaddon, S. Moradi, Iran. J. Catal. 2 (2012) 101-106. 32. F. Tamaddon, Z. Razmi, Synth. Commun. 41 (2011) 485-492. 33. J. S. Yadav, B. V. Subba Reddy, P. T. Reddy, Synth. Commun. 31 (2001) 425430. 34. B. Karimi, A. Mobaraki, H. M. Mirzaei, D. Zareyee, H. Vali, ChemCatChem. 6 (2014) 212-219. 35. M. Nasr-Esfahani, M. Montazerozohori, R. Raeatikia, Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 8 (2014) 32-40.
11
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
Figure 1. Reusability of the reaction medium.
Figure 2. Effect of urea on the time and rate of Biginelli reaction with 0.01 g of urease.
Figure 3. Effect of urease on % of A/B in the Biginelli reaction.
12
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
Figure 4. Effect of urease loading on the urea-based Hantzsch reaction.