Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

Agricultural Sciences in China August 2011 2011, 10(8): 1262-1272 Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production LIU Hua-wei1*, ...

163KB Sizes 0 Downloads 33 Views

Agricultural Sciences in China

August 2011

2011, 10(8): 1262-1272

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production LIU Hua-wei1*, TONG Jian-ming2 and ZHOU Dao-wei1 1 2

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jilin 130012, P.R.China State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China

Abstract The experimental knowledge on efficacy, possible modes of action and aspects of application of Chinese herbs as feed additives for animal production are reviewed in this article. Chinese herbs commonly contain protein, carbohydrate, fat, vitamins, and mineral which are necessary nutrients to the growth of animal. Polysaccharide, organic acid, alkaloids, and essential oils involved in Chinese herbs can improve the immune function of livestock. Currently, numerous studies have demonstrated anti-oxidative and anti-microbial efficacy and the assumption that Chinese herbs may improve the flavor of meat, which has been confirmed by some observations, but the mode of this action is still unclear. Moreover, several observations support the hypothesis that herbal feed additives may favorably affect gut functions (e.g., enzyme activity, microbial eubiosis) in vitro. Such effects may explain a considerable number of practical studies with livestock reporting improved production performance after providing herbal feed additives. In summary, available evidence indicates that herbal feed additives may have the potential to add to the set of non-antibiotic growth promoters for use in livestock, such as organic acids and probiotics. However, a systematic approach toward the efficacy, mode of action and safety of herbal compounds used as feed additives for animal production seems to be required in the future. Key words: anti-microbial, anti-oxidative, Chinese herbs, animal production

INTRODUCTION In 2006, the European Union banned the use of antibiotic feed additives, and efforts are being made to restrict their use outside the European Union because of speculated risk for generating antibiotic resistance in pathogenic microbiota. Consequently, many approaches have been attempted to control or prevent the clinical diseases and maximize growth performance. Chinese herbs which are seem to be candidates of substitutes for antibiotic growth promoters have gained increasing interest. Chinese herbal feed additives are Chinese herb used in animal feeding to improve the performance of livestock (Zhang H Y Received 3 August, 2010

et al. 2005). Although some Chinese herbs have been used for thousands of years, our knowledge is still limited regarding their modes of action with the concepts of modern medicine because the ideology underlying Chinese herbs is quite different from that of modern/western world. Further complications arise because herbal feed additives may vary widely with respect to botanical origin, processing and composition. Moreover, the results of most studies are obtained by blends of various active compositions and the studies focus on the effects on performance rather than the physiological impacts. In this context, the following provides an overview of recent knowledge on the use of Chinese herbal feed additives in animal diets, possible mode of action and further research.

Accepted 1 December, 2010

LIU Hua-wei, Ph D, Tel: +86-431-85542206, E-mail: [email protected]; Correspondence ZHOU Dao-wei, Professor, Tel/Fax: +86-431-85542206, E-mail: [email protected] © 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60118-1

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

GENERAL ASPECTS OF CHINESE HERBAL FEED ADDITIVES In China, Chinese herbs feed additives are commonly classified to various types according their functions with the concepts of traditional Chinese medicine, such as relieving food stagnation (Tangerine Peel, Medicated Leaven, Malt); reducing heat and detoxification (Honeysuckle Flower, Bupleurum, Sophora Root); promoting blood circulation and metabolism (Chinese Angelica, Safflower, Chinese Motherwort, Acanthopanax Root Bark, Szechuan Lovage Root), replenishing the vital energy and nourishing the blood (Astragalus, Codonopsis Root, China Dodder, Fleeceflower Root, Privet Fruit), tranquilization for pain (Polygala, Sweetflag Rhizome, Seman Platycladi, Spine Date Seed), expelling intestinal parasites (Betel Nut, Stemona, Rangoon Creeper Fruit with Seeds), and antisepsis and anti-oxidation (Eucommia Bark) (Zhang H Y et al. 2005; Lv et al. 2007).

MODE OF ACTION OF CHINESE HERBAL FEED ADDITIVES Nutritional effects In general, Chinese herbs, which contain abundant protein, carbohydrate, vitamin, fat, and mineral, can play an important part on nutritive equilibrium, enhancing growth performance and modifying physiological function. For example, besides protein, carbohydrate and fat, Chinese jujube contains vitamin A, C and abundant Ca, Fe, P, which are necessary components for livestock. Pine needle meal contain 92-92.2% dry matter (DM), 7.8-8.96% crude protein (CP), 7.8-8.96% ether extract (EE), 26.84-27.12% crude fiber (CF), 37% nitrogen-free extract (NFE), 3-6% ASH, 6.33% amino acid (AA), 3.8 mg kg-1 VB1, 215 mg kg-1 Mn, 38 mg kg-1 Zn, and other microelements (Li 2001).

Antimicrobial actions Chinese herbs are well known to exert antimicrobial actions in vitro against important pathogens, including

1263

fungi (Dorman and Deans 2000; Burt 2004; Si et al. 2006; Ozer et al. 2007). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi against E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 3.2, 3.2, 50, and 100 mg mL-1, respectively. MIC of Forsythia Fruit against foregoing bacteria was 3.2, 6.3, 6.3, 50 mg mL-1, respectively (Luo and Lu 2002). Some studies in vitro revealed MIC of pure active substances was better than Chinese herbs. For example, the diameter of antibacterial circle of natural extract of Forsythia Fruit against Salmonella pullorum was 22 mm, MIC was 1.563 mg mL-1 and against Salmonella typhimurium was 20.6 mm and 3.125 mg mL-1, respectively. Herbal feed additives including different active substances exert their antimicrobial activity through different mechanisms. The one possible antimicrobial mode of action is considered to arise mainly from the potential of active substances to intrude into the bacterial cell membrane, disintegrate membrane structures, and cause ion leakage (Newton et al. 2002; Burt 2004; Hashemi and Davoodi 2010). Moreover, some studies reported that tannins as active substance involved in herbal feed additives acted by iron deprivation, hydrogen bounding or non-specific interactions with vital protein such as enzymes (Scalbert 1991; Chung et al. 1993). Karou et al. (2006) observed that the mechanism by which alkaloid displays an antimicrobial activity was based on the ability to inhibit DNA synthesis. Another implication of the antimicrobial action of herbal feed additives is reducing the risk of microbial contamination of carcasses. Indeed, there are isolated reports on the beneficial effects of essential oils from oregano on the microbial load of total viable bacteria, as well as of specific pathogens (e.g., Salmonella) on broiler carcasses (Aksit et al. 2006). However, available data are still too limited to allow reliable conclusions on the possible efficacy of certain herbal feed additives to improve carcass hygiene.

Enhancing immune functions Among the immune active substances including in Chinese herbs, polysaccharide is a main immune active substance therefore it is known as the foundation of enhancing immune function. Chen et al. (2003) ob-

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1264

served that achyranthan and astragalan polysaccharides increase nitric oxide and interleukin-2 (IL-2) production of splenocytes. In addition, some studies revealed that ginsenosides and astragalus saponins strengthen the phagocytic function of the reticuloendothelial system, elevate the lymphocyte transformation rate and promote antibody formation (Gao et al. 2001). Total alkaloids of Sophora alopecuroides enhance the humoral and cellular immune response and stimulate macrophage phagocytosis (Liu and Dai 2007). The use of oxymatrine in mouse feed revealed spleen T-, B-cell proliferation (Liu and Dai 2007).

Anti-oxidative action Anti-oxidative properties of Chinese herbs are well described (Craig 1999; Nakatani 2000; Wei and Shibamoto 2007). Among the anti-oxidative constituents including in Chinese herbs, the volatile oils from the Labiatae family (mint plants) have been attracting the greatest interest, especially products from rosemary. Their antioxidative activity arises from phenolic acids, such as rosmarinic acid (Cuppett and Hall 1998). Other Labiatae species with significant anti-oxidative properties are thyme and oregano, which contain large amounts of the monoterpenes thymol and carvacrol (Cuppett and Hall 1998). Plant species from the families of Zingiberaceae (e.g., ginger and curcuma) and Umbelliferae (e.g., anise and coriander), as well as plants rich in flavonoids (e.g., green tea) and anthocyans (e.g., many fruits), are also described as exerting antioxidative properties (Nakatani 2000; Wei and Shibamoto 2007). The anti-oxidative mode of action is considered to arise mainly from scavenging free radical and regulating the activity of anti-oxidative enzyme (Liu et al. 2010). Charles and Huang (2009) found mRNA transcription of the enzymes SOD was increased by the treatment of sweet cassava polysaccharide in the liver tissues of CCl4-induced hepatitis rats. The anti-oxidant property of many Chinese herbs may be assumed to contribute to protection of feed lipids from oxidative damage, like the antioxidants usually added to diets (e.g., α-tocopheryl acetate or butylated hydroxytoluene). Although this aspect has not been explicitly investigated for animal feeds, there is a wide practice of successfully using flavonoids, essential oils,

LIU Hua-wei et al.

especially those from the rosemary, as natural antioxidants in human food (Cuppett and Hall 1998). The principal potential of herbal feed additives containing phenolic compounds to improve the oxidative stability of animal-derived products has been demonstrated for poultry meat (Basmacioglu et al. 2004; Govaris et al. 2004; Giannenas et al. 2005; FlorouPaneri et al. 2006), pork (Janz et al. 2007), rabbit meat (Botsoglou et al. 2004b; Liu et al. 2009), and eggs (Botsoglou et al. 2005). Oxidative stability was also shown to be improved with other herbal products (Botsoglou et al. 2004a; Schiavone et al. 2007). Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether these herbal anti-oxidants are able to replace the anti-oxidants usually added to the feeds (e.g., α-tocopherols) to a quantitatively relevant extent under conditions of common feeding practice. Recent studies have shown that herbal feed additives with anti-oxidant properties which cope with an excess of free radical produced upon oxidative stress could be used to alleviate the negative effects of high ambient temperature (Tuzcu et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2008). Liu et al. (2010) reported that dietary alfalfa polysaccharides could improve the growth performance through modulating the antioxidant status in heatstressed rabbit.

Specific effect on meat flavor and gut functions Herbal feed additives are often claimed to improve the flavor of meat. Flavor of meat is a complicated indicator, which arises from many factors. At present, most studies focus on amino acid, fat, fat acid, glycogen, inosine monophosphate (IMP), and so on (Guo and Liu 2003; Chen et al. 2004). Some studies showed the herb (e.g., glycine, garlic, tea) could increase the contents of IMP, glutamic acid, glycine, and intra muscular fat (IMF), and improve savor and aroma of meat (Wang et al. 2000; Sun et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2004; Nie et al. 2006). Moreover, Wang et al. (1996) who added herbal additives into broilers’ diet, reported herbal additives change the fatty acid composition of muscle, especially increase the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids. However, the numbers of studies investigating the mode of herbal products on flavor are quite limited. A wide range of Chinese herbs are known to exert

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

beneficial actions within the digestive tract, such as laxative and spasmolytic effects, as well as prevention from flatulence (Chrubasik et al. 2005). Furthermore, stimulation of digestive secretions (e.g., saliva), bile and mucus, and enhancing enzyme activity are proposed to be a core mode of nutritional action (Platel and Srinivasan 2004). In vitro activities of rat pancreatic lipase and amylase were shown to be significantly enhanced when brought into contact with various Chinese herbs and herbal extracts (Rao et al. 2003). Zhu et al. (2002) found greater activities of amylase, lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin in weaned piglets fed with herbal additives. Similarly, essential oils used as feed additives for broilers were shown to enhance the activities of trypsin and amylase (Lee et al. 2003; Jang et al. 2004). Glucose absorption from the small intestine was accelerated in rats fed anise oil (Kreydiyyeh et al. 2003). Furthermore, Manzanilla et al. (2004) fed a combination of essential oils and capsaicin to swine and observed that gastric emptying was slowed down by these feed additives. Herbal feed additives were also reported to stimulate intestinal secretion of mucus in broilers, an effect that was assumed to impair adhesion of pathogens and thus to contribute to stabilizing the microbial eubiosis in the gut of the animals (Jamroz et al. 2006). These observations support the hypothesis that herbal feed additives may favorably affect gut functions, but the numbers of in vivo studies with livestock are still quite limited. Saponins (e.g., from Yucca schidigera) are proposed to reduce intestinal ammonia formation, and thus aerial pollution of housing environment, which is considered an important health stress, especially for young animals (Francis et al. 2002). Studies with rats confirmed the existence of active components in Y. schidigera extracts that lower intestinal urease activity and enzymes involved in the metabolic urea cycle (Killeen et al. 1998; Duffy et al. 2001). Reduced intestinal and fecal urease activities were also found in broilers fed such extracts (Nazeer et al. 2002). However, yucca extracts were reported to contain subfractions with partially antagonistic properties on intestinal urease activity and ammonia formation (Killeen et al. 1998). Thus, further research seems to be required to clarify the potential of saponins as feed additives for livestock diets.

1265

A P P L I C AT I O N O F H E R B A L F E E D ADDITIVES TO ANIMAL PRODUCTION Swine production Literatures on the effect of herbal feed additives on production performance in swine are summarized in Table. The data vary widely from depressions in production performance to improvements. The primary mode of action of herbal feed additives arises from affecting the ecosystem of gastrointestinal microbiota through controlling potential pathogens (Roth and Kirchgessner 1998; Kroismayr et al. 2007). This applies especially to critical phases of an animal’s production cycle characterized by high susceptibility to digestive disorders, such as the weaning phase of piglets. Because of a more stabilized intestinal health, animals are less exposed to microbial toxins and other undesired microbial metabolites, such as ammonia and biogenic amines (Eckel et al. 1992). Consequently, herbal feed additives relieve the host animals from immune defense stress during critical situations and increase the intestinal availability of essential nutrients for absorption, thereby helping animals to grow better within the framework of their genetic potential (Zhang X H 2005; Zhou et al. 2005a). Improved digestive capacity in the small intestine may be considered an indirect side effect of herbal feed additives stabilizing the microbial eubiosis in the gut. Such an effect has been shown in swine (Jamroz et al. 2003; Hernandez et al. 2004). An improved prececal digestive capacity reduces the flux of fermentable matter into the hindgut, and thus lessens the postileal microbial growth and the excretion of bacterial matter in feces, respectively. Because bacterial protein is the dominant fraction of total fecal protein, an improved prececal digestive capacity may result indirectly in an increased apparent digestibility of dietary protein (calculated as the disappearance rate from intake until fecal excretion). Such an effect has been demonstrated for herbal feed additives in pigs (Oetting et al. 2006; Stoni et al. 2006).

Ruminant production Some studies on cattle and sheep indicated herbal feed

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1266

LIU Hua-wei et al.

Table Effect of herbal feed additives on production performance in swine and poultry Herbal feed additive Swine Bazhen Herbal extracts Echinacea purpurea Chinese rhubarb Fennel oil Caraway oil Poultry Oregano Oregano Oregano Garlic Thymol Herb mix Herb mix Herb mix Herb mix 1)

Dietary dose (g kg-1)

10 7.5 5 2.5 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.30 5.0 1.0 0.1 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0

Effect1) FI

BW

ADG

FCR

-14 -17 +4 +17 +3 0

+5 -15 +5 +32 +6 +3

-18 -3 -2 -16 -3 -3

-6 -3 +5 -5 +1 0 +5 +2 +1

-2 +1 +7 -5 +1 +2 +2 +1 +1

-4 -4 -2 0 0 -2 +3 +1 0

Reference

Lien et al. 2007 Namkung et al. 2004 Maass et al. 2005 Straub et al. 2005 Schone et al. 2006 Schone et al. 2006 Basmacioglu et al. 2004 Basmacioglu et al. 2004 Florou-Paneri et al. 2006 Sarica et al. 2005 Lee et al. 2003 Guo et al. 2004 Guo et al. 2004 Guo et al. 2004 Guo et al. 2004

Percentage of difference from untreated control.

additives not only raised the average milk yield but also had an important preventive role in Hidden Mastitis (Sun et al. 2005). In addition, herbal feed additives could improve milk quality, raised the total solids, protein, fat, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn contents of milk (Wu et al. 2005). Ma D Y et al. (2005) reported herbal feed additives added into the dairy cow diet increased the milk yield by 12.88% (P<0.01) and significantly reduced the incidence of mastitis. Yan et al. (2005), who added the herbal feed additives including Astragalus, Polygonum multiflorum, Liquorice, Coptis, and Medlar into dairy cow diet, observed no significant differences in milk fat percentage and contents of milk dry matter, non-fat milk solids, milk protein and lactose, whereas a positive effect on milk yield and reducing the incidence of mastitis. Similar findings were obtained by Zhou et al. (2005b), who indicated herbal feed additives not only had curative effects on Hidden Mastitis but also had no residue in milk. Herbal feed additives are often described as potential immunoenhancer and buffer for easing heat stress. Wu et al. (2005) who added the herbal feed additives including Gypsum, Woad Root, Astragalus as buffer for easing heat stress into dairy cow diet, observed herbal feed additives not only improved milk yield but also raised the cortisol levels in cow’s blood. The results showed the probable mode of easing heat stress arose from improving the secretion of cortisol. For sheep, Zuo et al. (2005) investigated the influence of herbal feed additives on Small Tail Han sheep digest-

ibility and the growth performance and hormone levels. Results showed herbal feed additives significantly improved the average daily gain (ADG), in particular, sheep fed 1.5 and 2.0% herbal feed additives showed a significant difference in the apparent digestibility of organic matter, CP, acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and a significant increasing tendency of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor.

Poultry production In recent years, herbal feed additives have attracted increasing interest as an alternative feeding strategy to replace antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. As shown in Table, the majority of experimental data indicated herbal feed additives improve production performance in poultry. In addition, some studies observed that herbal feed additives could improve the carcass traits and meat quality of poultry. Hu et al. (2005), who added 1% herbal feed additives composed of Eucommia, Bark, Sodium Glutamate into AA broiler chicks, observed that herbal feed additives enhanced the percentage of lean meat percentage, chest muscle, thigh muscle and water holding capacity (P<0.05), reduced the percentage of abdominal fat, drip losses, and cooking loss (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in dressed percentage, percentage of eviscerated yield, percentage of half-eviscerated yield and pH of meat. In addition, there are some evidences that

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

herbal feed additives can also improve the immune function (Dong et al. 2005; Duan et al. 2005; Ma Y F et al. 2005). For example, Gao et al. (2001) reported Astraglan and Astragaloside extracted from Astragalus markedly increased the conA-induced proliferation of T lymphocytes. Astraglan significantly promoted the LPS-induced proliferation of B lymphocytes at concentrations of 10 μg mL -1. Dong et al. (2007) observed polysavone (alfalfa extract) improved (P<0.05) the relative thymus and spleen weights at 6 wk of age and the bursa weights at 4 and 5 wk of age compared with the control group. At 4 and 6 wk of age, the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes in the Polysavone group was significantly greater (P<0.05) than that in the control group. When birds were 4 and 5 wk of age, polysavone resulted in a significant increase in serum anti-Newcastle disease virus hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer. For laying hen, the herbal feed additives have similar effects. Huang (2002), who fed herbal feed additives containing Astragalus, Figwort Root, Pine Needles, Viola, Indigo to ISA brown laying hens, indicated the herb-treated groups had higher laying rate and average egg size and better egg quality than the control group.

Aquaculture production Clove Flower Bud and Orange Peel were claimed to improve the flavor of fish feed (Guo et al. 2005). Crucian fed with herbal additives containing Baical Skullcap Root as a main active substance showed higher body weight gain and body fat, protein content and lower feed coefficient. It was concluded that herbal feed additives could improve the meat quality of crucian carp (Hu et al. 2005). Attempts have been made to determine the antimicrobial actions of herbal feed additives by adding them to fish diets. Liu et al. (2004), who added Astragalus, Woad Root, Astragalus, Poria, and Houttuynia to carp diets, observed fish fed with Chinese herbs had more intestinal bacteria including Bacillus and Corynebacterium which control group did not have. Moreover, these Chinese herbs changed the composition of predominant bacteria, increased the proportion on Bacillus and reduced the populations of Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, Pseudomonas, Vibrio, and Enterobacter. Besides fish, application of herbal feed additives to

1267

shrimp also had efficient (Wang and Zhou 2005). Guo et al. (2005) who investigated the influence of varied herbal feed additives concentrations on Litopenaeus Vannamei, reported herbal feed additives (mainly Astragalus) significantly improved the growth performance and enhanced the immune factors activity, increased shrimp survival rates. In particular, shrimp fed with 1 and 2% herbal feed additives had higher BW gain, phenoloxidase activity, peroxidase activity, antibacterial activity than the control group (P<0.01). Moreover, the immune protection rate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus was 50-65%.

Rabbit production Some Chinese herbs (e.g., Nippon Hawthorn Fruit, Fructus Hordei Germinatus, and Medicated Leaven were known as improving the appetite and growth performance for rabbits (Zhao et al. 2005). Meng (1994), who fed herbal feed additives containing Cang Zhu, Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae, Folium Isatidis, Pasqueflower, Astragalus, Purslane, Plantain, and Licorice Roots Northwest Origin to angora long hair rabbit, reported herbal feed additives increased birth weight and average daily gain by 18 and 19%, respectively, improved feed conversion ratio and production of rabbit hair. Liu et al. (2010) observed that the use of polysaccharides extracted from alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) improved the growth performance of heatstressed rabbits. Moreover, Chinese herbs were useful to improve the reproductive performance. Zhang and Yuan (2006), who added herbal feed additives including Pasqueflower, Apocynum, Copper leaf, and so on, observed herbal feed additives could increase fecundation ratio, litter size and newborn survival rate by 20.0, 37.3 and 16.3%, respectively. In practical conditions, some breeder suggested that herbal feed additives had efficacy on disease control and prevention (Guo 1994; Yang 1994). Zhang and Yuan (2006) reported herbal additives reduced the incidence of coccidiosis and dysentery significantly.

F U R T H E R C O N S I D E R AT I O N S O N CHINESE HERBAL FEED ADDITIVES Besides efficacy, the primary principle of application

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1268

of Chinese herbal feed additives to livestock is safe to the animal, the user, the consumer of the animal product, and the environment. For exposed animals, much attention should be paid to adverse health effects of Chinese herbal feed additives, especially in the case of an accidental overdose. Regarding the user (e.g., feed manufacturer, farmer), the handling of pure formulations of such feed additives usually required protective measures because they are potentially irritating and could cause allergic contact dermatitis (Burt 2004). With respect to consumer safety, the herbal feed additives can not be relieved from determination of possible undesired residues in products derived from animals fed those products. For example, Stoni et al. (2006) reported almost complete absorption of carvacrol and thymol in swine fed these extract from Chinese herbs and detected their glucuronic acid and sulfate metabolites in blood plasma and kidney. Because the metabolic activity (e.g., absorption, potential to accumulate in edible tissues) differs widely among herbal compounds, safety needs to be assessed separately for each individual herbal feed additive. The putative efficacy of Chinese herbs mainly relies on empirical or anecdotal data and tradition of use, which frequently cannot satisfy the requirements of application into livestock production. Thus, it is necessary to establish the pharmacological basis for the actions of Chinese herbs. Currently, an approach is to extract the active ingredients from Chinese herbs. However, some studies showed that the pharmacological effect of extracts of Chinese herbs isolated in their pure state differ from that of the whole herbs. Moreover, several Chinese herbs are usually mixed to achieve a pharmacological effect, thereby making it extremely difficult to attribute the effect to a particular herb. Thus, it is very important to note that it is a need to define a systematic research strategy that may be suitable for evaluating the Chinese herbs. Noteworthy is the fact that the Chinese herbs from different regions and seasons have different efficacy and contents of active substances. At present, it is difficult to make a correct assessment of efficacy and supervise quality because of no uniform quality standards and standard formula. Thus, further research seems to be required to standardize methods for their extraction.

LIU Hua-wei et al.

CONCLUSION In conclusion, Chinese herbal feed additives are claimed to exert antioxidant, enhancing immune functions, antimicrobial and growth-promoting effects in livestock. In the future, a systematic approach is needed to evaluate the efficacy and mode of action for Chinese herbal feed additives and each of type and dose of active compound, as well as toxicity studies. The development of suitable analytical technologies which are capable of assaying the contents of active compound and establishing the structure-activity relations will aid in establishing uniform quality standards and standard formula for utilizing herbal feed additives efficiently and safely. Moreover, the current experimental results seem to justify the assumption that Chinese herbal feed additives may have the potential to be a candidate of substitute for antibiotic to promote production performance and productivity of animal.

Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30970493, 30800798) for financing the research.

References Aksit M, Goksoy E, Kok F, Ozdemir D, Ozdogan M. 2006. The impacts of organic acid and essential oil supplementations to diets on the microbiological quality of chicken carcasses. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 70, 168-173. (in German) Basmacioglu H, Tokusoglu O, Ergul M. 2004. The effect of oregano and rosemary essential oils or alpha-tocopheryl acetate on performance and lipid oxidation of meat enriched with n-3 PUFAs in broilers. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34, 197-210. Botsoglou N A, Christaki E, Florou-Paneri P, Giannenas I, Papageorgiou G, Spais A B. 2004a. The effect of a mixture of herbal essential oils or alpha-tocopheryl acetate on performance parameters and oxidation of body lipid in broilers. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34, 52-61. Botsoglou N A, Florou-Paneri P, Christaki E, Giannenas I, Spais A B. 2004b. Performance of rabbits and oxidative stability of muscle tissues as affected by dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 58, 209218. Botsoglou N A, Florou-Paneri P, Botsoglou E, Dotas V, Giannenas I, Koidis A, Mitrakos P. 2005. The effect of feeding rosemary,

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

1269

oregano, saffron and alpha-tocopheryl acetate on hen performance and oxidative stability of eggs. South African

und biogenen Aminen im Gastrointestinaltrakt. 4. Mitteilung: Untersuchungen zur nutritiven Wirksamkeit von organischen

Journal of Animal Science, 35, 143-151. Burt S. 2004. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and

Sauren in der Ferkelaufzucht. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berl.), 67, 198-205. (in German)

potential applications in food - A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 94, 223-253.

Florou-Paneri P, Giannenas I, Christaki E, Govaris A, Botsoglou N A. 2006. Performance of chickens and oxidative stability

Charles A L, Huang T C. 2009. Sweet cassava polysaccharide extracts protects against CCl 4 liver injury in Wistar rats.

of the produced meat as affected by feed supplementation with oregano, vitamin C, vitamin E and their combinations.

Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 1494-1500. Chen J L, Wen J, Li J J, Wang S B, Zhao G P, Zheng M Q. 2004.

Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 70, 232-240. (in German) Francis G, Kerem Z, Makkar H P S, Becker K. 2002. The

Research on the formation and degradation of inosinic 5´monophosphate in chicken muscle under different storage

biological action of saponins in animal systems: A review. British Journal of Nutrition, 88, 587-605.

temperature. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 35, 276279. (in Chinese)

Gao W W, Cao L, Li Z, Tong J M, Sa R N. 2001. Effect of Astraglan and Astragaloside on the chicken lymphocyte

Chen H L, Li D F, Chang B Y, Gong L M, Dai J G, Yi G F. 2003. Effects of Chinese herbal polysaccharides on immunity and

proliferation. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 35, 16-18. (in Chinese)

growth performance of young broilers. Poultry Science, 82, 364-370.

Giannenas I A, Florou-Paneri P, Botsoglou N A, Christaki E, Spais A B. 2005. Effect of supplementing feed with oregano

Chrubasik S, Pittler M H, Roufogalis B D. 2005. Zingiberis rhizome: A comprehensive review on the ginger effect and

and (or) alpha-tocopheryl acetate on growth of broiler chickens and oxidative stability of meat. Journal of Animal

efficacy profiles. Phytomedicine, 12, 684-701. Chung K T, Stevens S E, Lin W F J, Wie C I. 1993. Growth

Feed Science, 14, 521-535. Govaris A, Botsoglou N, Papageorgiou G, Botsoglou E,

inhibition of selected food borne bacteria by tannic acid, propyl gallate and related compounds. Letters in Applied

Ambrosiadis I. 2004. Dietary versus post-mortem use of oregano oil and (or) alpha-tocopherol in turkeys to inhibit

Microbiology, 17, 29-32. Craig W J. 1999. Health promoting properties of common Chinese

development of lipid oxidation in meat during refrigerated storage. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition,

herbs. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70 (Suppl.), 491-499.

55, 115-123. Guo F, Liu F M. 2003. The biochemical changes in the muscle

Cuppett S L, Hall C A. 1998. Antioxidant activity of Labiatae. Advances in Food Nutrition Research, 42, 245-271.

tissue and changes in meat quality after the slaughter of animal. China Poultry, 25, 46-47.

Dong X F, Gao W W, Tong J M, Jia H Q, Sa R N, Zhang Q. 2007. Effect of polysavone (alfalfa extract) on abdominal fat

Guo F C, Kwakkel R P, Soede J, Williams B A, Verstegen M W A. 2004. Effect of a Chinese herb medicine formulation, as

deposition and immunity in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 86, 1955-1959.

an alternative for antibiotics, on performance of broilers. British Journal of Poultry Science, 45, 793-797.

Dong Y X, Han Y G, Wei Y H, Hu Z F. 2005. The effect of Chinese herbal medicine on growth of broiler and serum

Guo X. 1994. Application of Chinese herbs in prevention from rabbit diseases. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and

hormone. China Poultry, 27, 13-15. (in Chinese) Dorman H J D, Deans S G. 2000. Antimicrobial agents from

Veterinary Sciences, 24, 29-31. (in Chinese) Guo Y J, Xing K Z, Chen C X, Yang Y X, Zhu G X. 2005. Study

plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 88, 308-316.

on some Chinese herb medicines as feed attractant on carp (Cyprinus carpio). Journal of Tianjin Agricultural College,

Duan G, Yang L F, Dai F Y, Xiang X, Zhu C X. 2005. Effect of herbal medicine additives on IgG of local-breeding chooks.

12, 1-5. (in Chinese) Hashemi S R, Davoodi H. 2010. Phytogenics as new class of

Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 26, 79-80. (in Chinese) Duffy C F, Killeen G F, Connolly C D, Power R F. 2001. Effects

feed additive in poultry industry. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9, 2295-2304.

of dietary supplementation with Yucca schidigera Roezl ex Ortgies and its saponin and non-saponin fractions on rat

Hernandez F, Madrid J, Garcia V, Orengo J, Megias M D. 2004. Influence of two plant extracts on broilers performance,

metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, 3408-3413.

digestibility, and digestive organ size. Poultry Science, 83, 169-174.

Eckel B, Roth F X, Kirchgessner M, Eidelsburger U. 1992. Zum Einfluß von Ameisensaure aufdie Konzentration an Ammoniak

Hu Z Z, Zhu H, Li M N. 2005. Effects of complex additives of Chinese herbal medicine on meat quality of broilers. Cereal

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1270

LIU Hua-wei et al.

& Feed Industry, 9, 37-39. (in Chinese) Huang H R. 2002. Application of Chinese herbal medicine on

female broiler chickens. British Journal of Poultry Science, 44, 450-457.

hens. Veterinary Pharmaceuticals & Feed Additives, 7, 2-3. (in Chinese)

Li J Y. 2001. The discussion on ecosystem of intensive swine production. Ecology of Domestic Animal, 22, 16-22.

Jamroz D, Orda I, Kamel C, Wiliczkiewicz A, Wertelecki T, Skorupinska I. 2003. The influence of phytogenic extracts

Lien T F, Horng Y M, Wu C P. 2007. Feasibility of replacing antibiotic feed promoters with the Chinese traditional herbal

on performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, and gut microbial status in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal

medicine Bazhen in weaned piglets. Livestock Production Science, 107, 92-102.

Feed Science, 12, 583-596. Jamroz D, Wertelecki T, Houszka M, Kamel C. 2006. Influence

Liu H B, Zhang Y, Yang Y H, Lu T Y, Ye J D. 2004. Effects of five Chinese herb medicines as additive in feed on the growth

of diet type on the inclusion of plant origin active substances on morphological and histochemical characteristics of the

and intestinal microflora in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Journal of Dalian Fisheries University, 19, 16-20. (in Chinese)

stomach and jejunum walls in chicken. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berl.), 90, 255-268.

Liu H W, Francesco G, Laura G, Alberto B, Carola L, Guo K J, Tong J M, Ivo Z. 2009. Effects of chestnut tannins on carcass

Jang I S, Ko Y H, Yang H Y, Ha J S, Kim J Y, Kang S Y, Yoo D H, Nam D S, Kim D H, Lee C Y. 2004. Influence of essential

characteristics, meat quality, lipid oxidation and fatty acid composition of rabbits. Meat Science, 83, 678-683.

oil components on growth performance and the functional activity of the pancreas and small intestine in broiler chickens.

Liu H W, Dong X F, Tong J M, Zhang Q. 2010. Alfalfa polysaccharides improve the growth performance and

Asian-Australia Journal of Animal Science, 17, 394-400. Janz J A M, Morel P C H, Wilkinson B H P, Purchas R W. 2007.

antioxidant status of heat-stressed rabbits. Livestock Science, 131, 88-93.

Preliminary investigation of the effects of low-level dietary inclusion of fragrant essential oils and oleoresins on pig

Liu S H, Dai H. 2007. Pharmacological effects and clinical application of matrine and oxymatrine. Pharmacology and

performance and pork quality. Meat Science, 75, 350-355. Karou D, Savadogo A, Canini A, Yameogo S, Montesano C.

Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica, 23, 245-247. (in Chinese) Luo Q H, Lu C Y. 2002. In vitro antibacterial test of 10 kinds of

2006. Antibacterial activity of alkaloids from Sida acuta. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 195-200.

Chinese herbs. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology, 32, 38-39.

Killeen G F, Connolly C R, Walsh G A, Duffy C F, Headon D R, Power R F. 1998. The effects of dietary supplementation

Lv W X, He J H, Wang J H. 2007. Effects of eucommia ulmoides extract on performance and intestinal microflora of broilers.

with Yucca schidigera extract or fractions thereof on nitrogen metabolism and gastrointestinal fermentation processes in

Acta Zoonutrimenta Sinica, 19, 61-65. (in Chinese) Ma D Y, Shan A S, Chen Z H. 2005. Influence of Ligustrum

the rat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 76, 91-99.

lucidum, Schisandra chinensis, Si jun zi tang and Daidzein on antioxidant status of laying hens under heat stress. Acta

Kreydiyyeh S I, Usta J, Knio K, Markossian S, Dagher S. 2003. Aniseed oil increases glucose absorption and reduces urine

Zoonutrimenta Sinica, 17, 23-27. (in Chinese) Ma Y F, Wang H Y. 2005. Study on enhancing the output of cow

output in the rat. Life Science, 74, 663-673. Kroismayr A, Sehm J, Pfaffl M, Plitzner C, Foissy H, Ettle T,

milk by Chinese herb feed additive. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 26, 36-38. (in Chinese)

Mayer H, Schreiner M, Windisch W. 2008. Effects of essential oils or avilamycin on gut microbiology and blood parameters

Manzanilla E G, Perez J F, Martin M, Kamel C, Baucells F, Gasa J. 2004. Effect of plant extracts and formic acid on the

of weaned piglets. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 377387.

intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3210-3218.

Kong X F, Wu G Y, Hou Z P, Liu H J, Yin F G, Li T J, Huang R L, Zhang Y M, Deng D, Kang P, et al. 2006. Dietary

Maass N, Bauer J, Paulicks B R, Bohmer B M, Roth-Maier D A. 2005. Efficiency of Echinacea purpurea on performance and

supplementation with the ultra-fine powder of Chinese herbs enhances cellular and humoral immunities in earlyweaned

immune status in pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutriton (Berl.), 89, 244-252.

piglets (abstract). In: The 10th International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs. Danish Institute of Agricultural

Meng Z J. 1994. Application of Chinese herbal additives on long hair rabbit. Fur Animal Breeding, 2, 17-18. (in Chinese)

Sciences, Danmark. p. 5. Lee K W, Everts H, Kappert H J, Frehner M, Losa R, Beynen A

Nakatani N. 2000. Phenolic antioxidants from Chinese herbs and spices. Biofactors, 13, 141-146.

C. 2003. Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance, digestive enzymes and lipid metabolism in

Namkung H, Li M, Gong J, Yu H, Cottrill M, de Lange C F M. 2004. Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Utilization of Chinese Herbal Feed Additives in Animal Production

1271

extracts on growth performance, gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs. Canada Journal of Animal

Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berl.), 91, 256-267.

Science, 84, 697-704. Nazeer M S, Pasha T N, Abbas S, Ali Z. 2002. Effect of yucca

Si W, Gong J, Tsao R, Zhou T, Yu H, Poppe C, Johnson R, Du Z. 2006. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and

saponin on urease activity and development of ascites in broiler chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 1,

structurally related synthetic food additives towards selected pathogenic and beneficial gut bacteria. Journal of Applied

174-178. Newton S M, Lau C, Gurcha S S, Besra G S, Wright C W. 2002.

Microbiology, 100, 296-305. Stoni A, Zitterl-Egelseer K, Kroismayr A, Wetscherek W,

The evaluation of forty-three plant species for in vitro antimycobacterial activities: Isolation of active constituents

Windisch W. 2006. Tissue recovery of essential oils used as feed additive in piglet feeding and impact on nutrient

from Psoralea corylifolia and Sanguinaria canadensis. Journal of Ethnopharmacol, 79, 57-67.

digestibility. Proceedings of the Society of Nutrition Physiology, 15, 60.

Nie L, Zhang M, Duan K H. 2006. Effect of Chinese herbal feed additives on flavor and quality of pork. Heilongjiang Animal

Straub R, Gebert S, Wenk C, Wanner M. 2005. Growth performance, energy, and nitrogen balance of weanling pigs

Science And Veterinary Medicine, 9, 54-55. (in Chinese) Oetting L L, Utiyama C E, Giani P A, Ruiz U D, Miyada V S.

fed a cereal-based diet supplemented with Chinese rhubarb. Livestock Production Science, 92, 261-269.

2006. Effects of herbal extracts and antimicrobials on apparent digestibility, performance, organs morphometry

Sun D C, Wang X D, Wang H, Wang G M. 2005. The Chinese herbal medicine additive of natural plant produces the influence

and intestinal histology of weanling pigs. Brazil Journal of Animal Science, 35, 1389-1397.

of performance on the cow. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, 20, 533-535. (in Chinese)

Ozer H, Sokmen M, Gulluce M, Adiguzel A, Sahin F, Sokmen A, Kilic H, Baris O. 2007. Chemical composition and

Sun D W, Zhan Y, Xu Z R. 2002. Recent progress in promoter of meat quality. Feed Review, 2, 9-11. (in Chinese)

antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and methanol extract of Hippomarathum microcarpum

Tuzcu M, Sahin N, Karatepe M, Cikim G, Kilinc U, Sahin K. 2008. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate supplementation can

(Bieb.) from Turkey. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 937-942.

improve antioxidant status in stressed quail. British Poultry Science, 49, 643-648.

Platel K, Srinivasan K. 2004. Digestive stimulant action of spices: A myth or reality? Indian Journal of Medicine Research,

Wang G J. 2005. Application of betaine in aquatic animals. China Feed, 7, 27-29. (in Chinese)

119, 167-179. Rao R R, Platel K, Srinivasan K. 2003. In vitro influence of

Wang L, Piao X L, Kim S W, Piao X S, Shen Y B, Lee H S. 2008. Effects of Forsythia suspensa extract on growth performance,

spices and spice-active principles on digestive enzymes of rat pancreas and small intestine. Nahrung, 47, 408-412.

nutrient digestibility, and antioxidant activities in broiler chickens under high ambient temperature. Poultry Science,

Roth F X, Kirchgessner M. 1998. Organic acids as feed additives for young pigs: Nutritional and gastrointestinal effects.

87, 1287-1294. Wang Q, Zhou S Y, Zhang J L, Zhang Y X, Chen Z. 1996.

Journal of Animal Feed Science, 8, 25-33. Sarica S, Ciftci A, Demir E, Kilinc K, Yildirim Y. 2005. Use of an

Research on the effect of Chinese herbal additives on improving flavor of chicken. Yunnan Journal of Animal Science

antibiotic growth promoter and two herbal natural feed additives with and without exogenous enzymes in wheat

and Veterinary Medicine, 1, 8-10. (in Chinese) Wang S B, Wen J, Chen J L, Zhao G P. 2004. Effect of different

based broiler diets. South African Journal of Animal Science, 35, 61-72.

storage condition on the flavor of muscle in Beijing fatty chicken. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,

Scalbert A. 1991. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry, 30, 3875-3883.

31, 21-24. (in Chinese) Wang Y, Zhou M. 2005. Application of Chinese herbal feed

Schone F, Vetter A, Hartung H, Bergmann H, Biertumpfel A, Richter G, Muller S, Breitschuh G. 2006. Effects of essential

additives. Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 33, 701-702. (in Chinese)

oils from fennel (Foeniculi aetheroleum) and caraway (Carvi aetheroleum) in pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal

Wang Y Z, Xu Z R, Feng J. 2000. Study on the effect of betaine on meat quality and the mechanism in finishing pigs. Scientia

Nutrition (Berl.), 90, 500-510. Schiavone A, Righi F, Quarantelli A, Bruni R, Serventi P, Fusari

Agricultura Sinica, 33, 94-99. (in Chinese) Wei A, Shibamoto T. 2007. Antioxidant activities and volatile

A. 2007. Use of Sibyllum marianum fruit extract in broiler chicken nutrition: Influence on performance and meat quality.

constituents of various essential oils. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 55, 1737-1742.

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

1272

Wu D F, Hu M H, Huang J H, Weng S T, Li J M, Chi X L, Yan W Q, Liu C. 2005. Effect of traditional Chinese herbal medicine for thermoresistant stress alleviation on the blood biochemical indices in dairy cow and the adrenocorticotrophic hormone indices of albino rat thermoresistant stress model. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 34, 255-259. (in Chinese) Yan S M, Qiao L, Song L H, Yu F Q. 2005. Effects of Chinese medicinal Chinese herbs on lactating performance of dairy cows and somatic cell count in milk. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 37, 17-19. (in Chinese) Yang M S. 1994. Chinese herbal medicine therapy for common rabbit diseases. Chinese Journal of Rabbit Farming, 1, 40. (in Chinese) Zhang H Y, Guo Q, Wen W Y. 2005. Research progress in Chinese herbal medicine feed additive. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 11, 12-14. (in Chinese) Zhang J W, Yuan Z Y. 2006. Effect of Chinese herbs on disease resistance and reproductive performance of rabbit. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 6, 21-22. (in Chinese) Zhang X H, Zhou Q, Hu L H, Wang G X. 2005. Effect of Chinese

LIU Hua-wei et al.

herbal additives on growth performance in weaned piglets. Feed Research, 4, 9-11. (in Chinese) Zhao H Q, Xu H J, Du W B, Li L, Zhang D F. 2005. Research and applications of Chinese herbal additives. Chinese Journal of Rabbit Farming, 1, 31-33. (in Chinese) Zhou Q, Mo C K, Li X, Zhang X H, Hu L H. 2005a. Effect of Chinese herbal additives on mastitis treatment and milk yield and quality in cow. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 1, 87-89. (in Chinese) Zhou Q, Zhang X H, Jiao Z W, Li X, Wu C J, He R G. 2005b. Influence of Chinese herb additives on the blood biochemical indices and hormones levels of piglet. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2, 91-93. (in Chinese) Zhu R J, Cheng Z B, Tian Y B, Ge C R. 2002. Effect of Chinese herb feed additives on the activities of digestive tract enzymes in pig starter. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural Universit, 17, 67-71. (in Chinese) Zuo X L, Zhao G X, Li J G, Shi W Y. 2005. Effect of Chinese herbal additives on growth performances and blood physiological and biochemical parameters in Small Tail Han Sheep. Feed Industry, 26, 30-33. (in Chinese) (Managing editor ZHANG Juan)

© 2011, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.