UV-visible and electron spin resonance study of mercapto-substituted hypocrellin B: photogeneration of semiquinone radical anion and superoxide

UV-visible and electron spin resonance study of mercapto-substituted hypocrellin B: photogeneration of semiquinone radical anion and superoxide

~-mrnltl~ I~'.,('HI,:ME~'I'I~.." ~ND I ~ g l l l ' l ~ l l 1)(~" A:I}tl'-Mg'.~TBY ELSEVIER Journal of Photochcmi~,try and Pl~tohiology A: Chcmi,...

457KB Sizes 0 Downloads 28 Views

.~-mrnltl~

I~'.,('HI,:ME~'I'I~.." ~ND

I ~ g l l l ' l ~ l l 1)(~"

A:I}tl'-Mg'.~TBY

ELSEVIER

Journal of Photochcmi~,try and Pl~tohiology A: Chcmi,,tr2:' I I I (1997) 105-109

UV-visible and electron spin resonance study of mercapto-substituted hypocrellin B: photogeneration of semiquinone radical anion and superoxide Min Weng, Man-Hua Zhang * Tad Shen bt~tilute of PItotogr~qddc Chemi.~tr3.'. Academia Sinic'a. Beiji,g, HIOIOI. People '~ Relmhlic el'China Received 21) May 19q7; a':ccpted 2 July 19t.~7

Abstract Merc:,pto-substituted hypocrellit, B derivatives ( MHBDs 1. display, in the absence of electron donors, a character istic absc,rbance peak and electrtm spin resonance (ESR) signal, which can be attributed to the semiquinone radical anion, formed by intermolecular electnm wanst'er. In the presence of electron donors, the amplitude of the ESR signal increases signilicantly. Irradiation of MHBDs in the premnce t~ oxygen leads to the generation of superoxide radicals, which may be registered by the spin trapping technique: the formation mechanism ofsulxroxide in the absence or presence of electron donors is discus~d. The free radicals and superoxide radicals formed on photoirradiation of MHBDs may play a hitherto unretognized role in biological processes. .~9 19tJ7 Elsevier Science S.A. Ke~word~'." Electron spin resonance: Mc~capto-.~uhstituted hyl~Crellin B: Pholt~generation: Scmiquinone radical anion: Superoxtde; UV-visible abr,or: 'nee

1. Introduction Hypocrellin A and B ( HA and HB ) ( Fig. i ) have recently been isolated from the natural fungus sacs of Hypocrella bambusae in China. These lipid-soluble 4.9-dihydroxy-3. l Operylenequinone derivatives, employed in pioneering photodynamic therapy (PDT) applications ofperylenequinonoid pigments (PQPS) I !,2 I, exhibit several advantages over the presently used haematoporphyrin derivative ( H P D ) . i.e. ease of preparation and purification relative to HPD. small aggregation tendency (which decreases the efficiency of HPD). strong red light ~hsorptivity and significantly reduced normal tissue photosensitivity because of the last metabolism in vivo [31. As a result, hypocrellins have been successfi, ily employed in the clinical PDT treatment of a number of skin diseases, such as while lesions of vulva, keioid, vitiligo, psoriasis, tinea capitis and lichen amyloidosis [4-61 without observing the prohmged normal tissue photosensitivity that occurs with HPD 13 ]. it has aiso been shown that hy,,x,,crellins are efficient singlet oxygen generators [ 7 ], and demonstrate advantages over the classic ~O~ sensitizel.'s (such as porphyrins, rose bengal, methylene blue, etc. ). including high molar extinction coefficients, wide l_lV-visible absorption, high quantum yields of singlet oxygen generation, high sta* Corresponding author. Fax: 0086 I0 62029375. 1010-6030/97/$17.00 © 1997 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved

t'llS 1 0 1 0 - 6 0 3 0 ( 9 7 ) 0 0 2 0 6 - 2

bility, gtRxl solubilit2r and ,,mall solvent and concentration effects I 8 I. Recent studies have indicated that the target of photodynamic action of hypocrellin is the cell membrane: this photodynamic action causes a reduction in the quantity of mercapto gruups in membrane proteins [9-111. Until recently, relatively little ell'oR had been devoted to the investigation of the reaction of HB with mercapto compounds and the mechanism of photodynamic activity of these HB derivatives. in this work. we describe the detection of electron spin resonance ( ESR ) signals of two kind., of mercapto-substitreed FIB derivative ( 5-RS-P. B, 5,8-RS-HB) in dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) in the absence of electron donors on imldiation by visible light, in addition, an increase in the concentration of free radicals w:'s detected in the presence of reducing agents. Finally. superoxide radicals were detected using the spin trappieg technique, and the generation mechanism of 02" w,,s studied in detail.

2. Experimental section HA and HB were extracted from the fungus sacs of Hrpocreila bambusae and purified by recrystallization from acetone; 5-RS-HB a:~d 5,8-RS-HB (Fig. !) were prepared

I(1¢'~

M. Wenget al. / Jr,unud tV Photochemi.~tm aml Photohiology A: Chemi.qrr III 11997) 105-109

O..H.,o ~ ~ 1

.H

R I ~ O C H j

.CCIt,

o,,,, 11

1

o

o,

IF T

X

R:- "IF T

oc..

o,

"'If" IrA,

22"oc.,

o

"'H" liB (R I =R2=H) 5-RS-IIB (R I =CH3(CH2) I IS,R2 =H) 5.R-RS-IIB (R I ::E2=C|I3(CIi2) ( I S)

{ig. 1. Chemical stracha,es of HA. liB. 5-RS-HB and 5,8-RS-HB. according to the method described previously ll21 5.5Danelh) I-I-l)yrroiine .N-oxide ( DMPO ) and mperoxide diswula.,,¢ (SOD) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical C,,mpany; DMPO was purified as described previously [ 13 ]: the degree of DMPO purity was determined by the ESR method. Cysteine was purchased from Biotech Technology Corporation. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Diethylaniline, N--ethylaniline. aniline, ascorbate.ethylenediaraiaetetraacetic acid ( E D T A ) , reduced mcotinamndc adenine dinucleotidc ( NADH ). d(xlecyl mercaplan. DMSO and other solvents, all of analytical grade, were purchased from Belling Chemical Plant. Water was freshly distilled befi~re use. The solutions were purged with oxygen, air or argon according to the experimemal requirements. The required high-purily solvents were prepared by further purilica:itm of the commercial products, and no impurities were detected by absorption a n d / o r fluorescence spectroscopy.

ESR signal as shown in Fig. 2. The intensity of the ESR signal increases rapidly with increasing pholoirradiation time. and decreases very slowly in the dark. The same spectrum is obtained when dimethylformamide ( D M F ) is used as solvent instead of DMSO. Irradiation is required for the generation of the 5-RS-HB radical. The kinetics rellect a fast increase in radical concentration, a rapid approach to a plateau and a slow decrease after the light is extinguished. When the sample is ex[x)sed to oxygen, the ESR signal is quenched rapidly. The ESR signal inw, nsity of the 5-RS-HB radical

B A

/

1

~ /m

2ct i

ESR spectra were recorded using a B r u k e r E R - 3 0 0 EPR spectrometer w i t h I(X) k H z tield m o d u l a t i o n operating at 9.5 G H z in quartz capillaries. Photoinduced ESR spectra o f

directly illuminated samples were recorded inside a microwave cavity. A 450 W medium-pressure sodium lamp was used as light source. A long-pass lil|er was employed to eliminate light at wavelengths less than 470 rim. Samples were dt.oxygenated by bubbling with argon gas for 30 min and were then injected quantitatively 125 Itl ) into deoxygenated quartz capdlaries. The concentration of the radicals wa:, estimated by the double integration method. The radical 2.2.6,6-tewamethylpiperidine oxide ( T E M P O ) . at a given concentration, was employed as reference: the accuracy of determination of the radical concentrations was 20%. U V visible absorption difference spectra were recorded with a Shimadzu UV-160A UV-visible spectrophotometer: the samples were bubbled with highly purilied argon for 30 min, irradiated with a 450 W medium-pressure sodium lamp and ~hcn measured in;mediately.

3. Results

Illumination of 5-RS-HB (i mM) in an argon-gassed DMSO solution for 2 rain leads to the generation of a strong

Fig. 2. Sl~ctrum A: photoinduccd ESR spectrum t'r~ml a deaemted DMSO •,olution of 5.8-RS-HB ( I mM) on irradiation atKivc 4"/(} nm t'l~r 2 min. Spectrum B: same as spectrum A. but the photoscnsitizcr ~as 5-RS-HB ( I mM ). Swdrum C: same as spectrum A. but iq the presence of DEA (5

mM) and irradiation for 30 s. Spectrum D: same as ~peclrumA. but oxygen ~as bubbled through the solulion alter illumination, instrumental settings ! spectra A. B and D): microwavepower, l.OI roW: m~lulation amplitude, 0.166 G: scan range, 20 G: receiver gain. 2× IO~. Instrumental settings I spectrum C): microv,ave IX~wer.1.01 roW: modulation amplitude. O.i 66 G; scan range, 2{)G; receiver gain. 2 x IO~.

M. II'l,~l.t/(.ial. /.Ioto-mtl OlPliot<,lti'mi~tr.~ aml P!u)toho)h,',,y ..!: ('lw~m~tr~ I I I ¢/9¢,17) Io5 -l~19 depends on the coiicentralion of 5-RS-HB. the prc,,ence of oxygen and the irradiation time and intensity. The 5-RS-HB concentration exerts such z, strong effect on the gcneralion o~ the 5 - R S - H B radical that the signal of the 5-RS-HB radical cain be observed even irl aerated D M S O at high concentralion. In order Io identify the character of the ESR signal shown in Fig. 2. the following expcrhuent was carried out. 5-RS-HB ( I inM ) ill D M S O was illunlinaled ill the presence of N,Ndiethylarliline ( DEA 1. an excellent electron donor, for 30 .,,. The ESR speclrum obtained is x cr 3 ,,infilar to that recorded in the absence of DEA. From Fi,, "~ it can be seen that the addition ())" DEA inien.,,ilies the ESR ,,ignal signilica,llly. Moreover .l series of other electron donors, including :Vethylaniline, aniline, cysteinc, ascorbatc, EDTA and NAI)H, produce anah)gous results. This intticates the anionic character of the 5 - R S - H B radical. As in the case of 5-RS-HB, 5.8RS-HB also produces a scnliquinone radical on illuniination ( Fig. 2 ). Its properties are similar to those of the 5-RS-HB radical. The ESR signal of the 5 - R S - H B mdical is quenched si~niticantly by oxygen; the signal disappears completely when oxygen is bubbled through a solution of the 5- RS- H B tad teal. Furlhcrnlore. visible light il radiation of am oxygellated solution of 5-RS-HB in the pre,,ence of a spin trap. DMPO. L,encrates an ESR spectrum of the D M P ( J - s u p e r o x i d e radical adduct, imnlcdiatcly acconlpanicd by the disappearance o | the ESR signal of the 5-RS-HB radical ( Fig. 3 ). Fhis muhipier ESR spectruin ix characterized b ) three coupling coil-

82r

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

,

iO7

~

.........



.......

-"l

I 0l "~ 0

i

.01

<')

]

-0.2

t

t

!

1

I

4OO

...

~

I

~

I

I

71)0

IO0

hlnm 0.2 . . . . . t:

0.1

<1

o

----

-0.I -02

i

'

~oo

(oo

._~

~

500

6oo

100

IQo

xism t:l.,_'. 4 I"V- \ i',ibl¢ ,ib,,orptio!~ dii.l..'r~.'l~,.'e ,.pcclr:t ,ihl~lillet| [ .~(I ~, i a 1, 2-.~i • ( b ) ~lll;I .i{,11 ,. ( c ) .i|Icf irl'ztdi;.ilillll o f ~i xoh/liOla o | 5 - R S - H B ( ~,pectrum A )

and 5 S-RS-II|] I ,,pcctruni li) in dc.',cr,itcd DMSO. BIcachinL_,of 5-RS-HB ~l,:,l 5 .S-RS-t IB i,, ob,,cr', cd at 421)-5,,"10nn~..and the characteristic ab•()rptit)n i,cak,, dl.t¢ io Ihc i.idi,..'al ;inh)ll• ,it" ':,-RS-tii] :tlld 5.S-RS-I-IBarc t~h,,cr, cd at {'}-.t3 IIIll .ind {)55 III111r e ' , p c c l i v e l } .

0_=_~ ~

_£ c

t:ig. 3.

Spectrum A:

I-SR slK'clrunl o f I ) M | ) O - s u ! l c r o x i d c

r'idteal a d d u c t

produced on ii'r;tdialitm of ~.111o\)~cnatcd DMSO ,,oh.tlion t,f 5.8-RS-i ill or 5-RS-HB ( I him ) and DMPO 131.1him ) Slx.,ctrufn B; ',amc ,is s|~',:ctrulu A. but in the plcs,,.'nce of DE:..&.Sr,cclntln (': name us spectrum A. hut in the present ' fSOi). In•lrunlent:il nctlingn: microv~a~cpower. 5.05 roW. llltldulalion amplitude. I.(15G: recei,,er ~ain. 2 :,<.Ii)~ ( npcclra A mid (" 1:2 N Ill ~ ( speclrum B ).

-,latll.x due It) tile presence of a nitrogen atom and tv, o hydrogen atoms ill the 13 and "y posilions. The de/ermined coupling constm:ts (a ~ = 12.7 G, a.," = 10.3 G anda; t ' = 1.5 (;) for ~his ESR spectn~m are consistent with previously reported x alues for ,he D M P O - O : ' radical adduct in D M S O I 1" ]. The addilion of SOD. a specilic and efficient scavenger for superoxide, inhibits ihe O_,-del~endcnt D M P O - O : ' adduct I'onm, tion i Fig. 3 ). SOD inhibits the ESR signal inten~,itv in a dose-dependent manaer. Analogous results are obtained when 5 - R S - t t B is replaced by 5.8-RS-HB. The decay kinetics, of the 5-RS-HB and 5,8-RS-HB radic a n were measured by recording the decrease in the ESR signal amplitude from its steady stats level alter illumination had been ex|inguished. The half-life of these radicals is approximately 10 rain. and can be satisfactorily described by a second-order reaction constant. The semiquinone radical anions of 5 - R S - H B and 5.8-RS-HB were very long lived, and therefore experiments were carried out using a scanning U V visible spectrometer. When 5 - R S - H B o r 5 , 8 - R S - H B in a deaerated solulk)~i of D M S O was irradiated, the colour o f the sample changed from purple to green. The difference spectra obtained after irradiation o f the samples are illustrated in Fig. 4: the absorption at 055 nm and 645 nm can be attributed to the 5,8-RS-HB and 5 - R S - H B radicals respectively for the following reasons:

I(18

M. Weng et al. ~ Journal of Photochemistry and Photohiology A: Chemisto" i ! I ( 1997~ 105-i09

1. identical absorbance peaks were formed in the presence of a reductant t' such as N.N-diethylaniline, N-ethylaniline and aniline) on irradiation with deaeratmn: 2. when the air was made to re-enter the photoirradiation system, the absorbance peak at 655 nm or 645 nm disappeared completely and the product returned quantitatively to 5,8-RS-HB or 5-RS-HB: 3. the decay constants of absorption at 655 nm and of the ESR signal of the 5,8-RS-HB radical, or the absorption at 645 nm and the ESR signal of the 5-RS-HB radical, were cGnsi,,tent in the dark.

If both the 5-RS-HB and 5,8-RS-HB radicals are produced via Eq. ( I ), the ESR signal may be due to the 5-RS-HB/5,8RS-HB semiquinone radical anion, the 5-RS-HB/5,8-RS-HB radical cation or the composite spectrum of both radical species, depending on the reaction conditions and relative lifetimes of these radicals. It is observed that the ESR signal of the 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB radical is greatly intensified by the addition of electron donors. These reduced substmtes, which are much richer in elections than both 5-RS-HB and 5,8-RS-HB. may transfer an electron directly to the excited state via 5 - R S - H B( 5 , 8 - R S - H B) + D - - , 5 - R S - H B'- ( 5 , 8 - R S - H B'- ) + D "+

4. Discussion In this ~,ork. we have .,,ho~,n that both 5-RS-HB and 5.8RS-HB in DMSO solution, on irradiation, can generate a radical in the absence of eleclron donors. The 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB concentratmn exerts a strong effect on the generation of the scmiquinone radical. The st~'ong concentration effect indicalcs that both the 5-RS-HB and 5,8-RS-HB radicals may be generated by intermolecular electron transfer between the grou.}d and excited state species according to 5-RS-HB+5-RS-HB* -~5-RS-HB" - +5-RS-HB'"

( I)

It has been observed that HB. the parent molecule of 5-RSHB and 5,8-RS-HB. can form an excimer at high concentration. Nuclear magnetic resonance I NMR) studies suggest that the excimer has a sandwich-like conliguration in which the quinonoid moiety of HB overlaps with the pilenolic part of another HB molecule 1151. This structure is faw)urable for electron transfer becau~ the electron donor (phenolic moiety} and the electron acceptor (quinonoid moiety) are positioned relatively close ;.o one another and are better oriented compared with the free-distributed mode of a dilute solution. Due to the analogous chemical structure of 5-RSHB, 5.8-RS-HB and HB, the light stimulation of the ESR signals of 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB may also be explained by an intermolecular electron transfer mechanism. On irradiation of the sample, an excited slate is formed which may transfer its electron to 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-ltB in the ground state to give the semiquinone cation and anion radical. This mechanism was postulated to occm on photoexcitation of concentrated solutions of qui,one ( I × 10 ~ mol dm ~ or more ) in the absence of electron donors [ 13]. An additional explanation for the ease of generation of the semiquinone radical of 5-RS-HB or 5.8-RS-HB in the absence of electron donors may be due to the long chains at position 5,8. Interaction results in a short distance between the 5,8-RS-HB or 5-RS-HB molecules, especially at high concentration (possibly stacked intermolecularly), making the electron transfer process more efficient, so that the absorbance of the semiquinone radical can be observed in the steady state abmrption spectra.

(2'1

and thus enhance efficiently the concentration of the semiquinone radical anion. Furthermore, the same ESR spectrum is also recorded when 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB is redtlced by electrolytic methods or by s(~ium dithionite reactions, both of which are accepted as reliable methods for the production of semiquinone radicals from quinones. Therefore the observed ESR speclr,Jm is considered to originate from 5-RS-HB'- or 5.8-RS-HB'-. The decay kinetics of both 5-RS-HB'- and 5.8-RS-HB'can be satisfactorily described by second-order reaction constants, indicating that the termination of ',he semiquinone radical anion is via a radical-radical annihilation reaction. In general, the radical cation of quinone is difficult to detect in common organic solvents due to its strong oxidizing ability 1171. The spin trapping experiments on irradiation of 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB in DMSO using DMPO point to the presence of a superoxide molecule. The absence of an ESR signal due to the DMPO--O:" adduct in the presence of SOD further confirms the formation of superoxid~ molecules. The generation of superoxide may be rationalized by one of the tbllowing processes 5 , 8 - R S - H B" - t 5 - R S - H B'- ) + O , ---,5 . 8 - R S - H B( 5 - R S - H B ) +O'_,

(3a)

~ 5 . 8 - R S - H B ( ~5- R S - H B ) +O., ~ 5 , 8 - R S - H B " ( 5 - R S - H B ' " ) +O'_,

(3b)

~ 5 , 8 - R S - H B ( ~ 5 - R S - H B ) +O_, ~ J O2 + 5 , 8 - R S - H B( 5 - R S - H B)

(3cl)

~O_,+ 5 . 8 - R S - H B( 5-- R S - H B ) - - , 5 , 8 - R S - H B "~ {5 - R S - H B "

(3c2) )+0"_4

In process (3a), the excited state of 5,8-RS-HB or 5-RS-HB, formed on irradiation, collides with another molecule in the ground state, resulting in electron transfer leading to the generation of the semiquinone rad:,cal anion; this then transfers its electron to oxygen, producing the original sensitizer and the superoxide radical anion. Radical anions derived from anthraquinone or adriamycin react rapidly with oxygen with a rate constant of the order of 10v' dm 3 mol-~ s-J [ 18,191. Alternatively, process (3b) may produce the superoxide rad-

M. Weng e; al. /Journal of PtuJtot'hemistry aml Photohiology A: Chemi~'tr)" I i I (I 997) 105-109

ical. In addition to these type i mechanisms, a tYFe I! mechanism (process (3c) ) may take place. This process involves the primary generation of singlet oxygen which, in turn, oxidizes a ground state sensitizer. Because the addition of a t O , scavenger, such as sodium azide and 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane ( D A B C O ) , does not lead to a decrease in the ESR signal intensity of the adduct, process (3c) is probably not involved in the formation of O , ' - to a significant extent, in addition, it was also found that DEA ( 3 mM ~ resu!ts in a 15-fold enhancement of O2"- production; at the same time, when DEA ( ! m M ) is added to an Ar-saturated DMSO solution containing 5.8-RS-HB ( i m M ) , the intensity of the ESR spectrum due to 5,8-RS-HB'- increases by 15-fold when compared with the spectrum of the sample in the absence of DEA. When an Ar-saturated DMSO solution containing a low concentration of 5,8-RS-HB ( 10 tiM) is illuminated with visible light, no ESR signal of 5,8-RS-HB'- is observed; when the solution is bubbled with oxygen in the presence of DMPO, no ESR spectrum of the D M P O - O z ' adduct is detected. This indicates that the formation of the DMPO-O2"- adduct is dependent on the presence of the semiquinone radical anion. The consistent environmental effects of formation of O.," - with those of 5-RS-HB or 5,8RS-HB suggest that the semiquinone radical anion is the precursor to the formation of O_,.... by 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RSHB. Thus process ( 3a ) seems to be preferred.

5. Conclusions Our studies have indicated that mercapto-substituted HB derivatives display an ESR signal in the absence of electron donors on irradiation. This signal is attributed to the semiquinone radical anion, which is produced via intermolecular electron transfer between the excited and ground state species. In the presence of electron donors, the intensity of the ESR signal increases. On irradiation of oxygenated 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB solution in the absence of reducing agents, the generation of the O_,'- radical was observed by the DMPO

109

spin trapping technique, and the generation mechanism of O, " via the transfer of an electron from the ,~miquinone radical anion to oxygen was confirmed. This work indicates that the semiquinone radical of 5-RS-HB or 5,8-RS-HB and the oxygen radical generated by the photoirradiation of the samples may be implicated in the mechanism of photodynamic activity.

Acknowledgements Generous financial support for this work was provMed by the National Nature Science Foundation of China,

References !11 L.J. Jiang. Kexrc Tongbao 21 11990) h'~i8-1616. 121 [..J. Jiang. Kcxu¢Tonglx/o 21 (1990) 168! - 1690. 131 5. Yamazaki. A. Okui~. Y. Akiyama. K. f"uma. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39 ( 19751 287-288. 141 R.Y. l,in~, J Chin. Skin. Clin. 15 (It#82) 88-90. 151 J.B. Wang, J.N. Bao. J. Chin Acad. Med. 7 ! 5 ~ 1:985 ) 349-35 I. 161 N.W. Fu, Y.X. Chu. LX. Y:an, J.Y. An, Z.J. Diwu, Chin. J. Oncol. I 0 ( I ) ( 1 9 8 8 ) 80. 17l J.Y. An. M.H. Zhang. G.Y. Wu. J.Y. Lin. G.Z. Ma, L.J. Jiang. S,,:i. Sin. cB) 15 (II) (1985) 975-982. 181 ZJ. Diwu.J.W. Lo,~n.J. Photochem. Photohiol. A: Chem. 64 (1092) 273-287. 191 LS. Cheng. Acta Biol. Exp. Sin. 89 (1985) 18. I IlJl J.H. 7heng. ,~cla Biophys.Sin. 2 ~1986) 312. I 111 J.Z. Wang, L.S. Cl:eng. AcIu Biophys.Sin. 3 (1987) 1733. 1121 L. Ma, M.H. Zhang, L.J. Jiang. Sci. Sin. (B) 12 (1992) 1248-1254. 1131 G.R. BueUner. LW. Oberley, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Corumun. 83 11978) 69. [ 14l J.R. Harbour, M.L. Hair. J. Phys. Chem. 82 (12) t 1978) 1397-1399. [151 Z.J. Diwu, L.J. Jiang. M.H. Zhang, Sci. Sin. (B) (English edition) (1989) (13) 18-26. 1161 J.H. Bruce. in: S. Palai (Ed.). The Chemistry.of QuinoidComptPands. vol. !, Wiley. New York, 1974, p. 465. 117l J. Mayer, R. Kra,sluklanls. J. Chem. Sty,'.. Faraday Trans. 87 ( 1991 ) 2943-2947. i Igl H. Pal, D.K. Palit. T. MukherTee,J.P. Mmal, J. Chem, S~x:.,Faraday Trans. 87 ( 1091 ) 1109. 119] J. Butler. BM. Molcy, A.J. Swallow, FEBS Lett., 182 11985) 9:5.