Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Virology 374 (2008) 261 – 272 www.elsevier.com/locate/yviro
Vaccination of rhesus macaques with a vif-deleted simian immunodeficiency virus proviral DNA vaccine Ellen E. Sparger a,⁎, Robert A. Dubie a , Barbara L. Shacklett b , Kelly S. Cole c , W.L. Chang d , Paul A. Luciw d a
Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Center for Vaccine Research, Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA d Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA b
c
Received 24 July 2007; returned to author for revision 12 November 2007; accepted 15 January 2008 Available online 7 February 2008
Abstract Studies in non-human primates, with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) have demonstrated that live-attenuated viral vaccines are highly effective; however these vaccine viruses maintain a low level of pathogenicity. Lentivirus attenuation associated with deletion of the viral vif gene carries a significantly reduced risk for pathogenicity, while retaining the potential for virus replication of low magnitude in the host. This report describes a vif-deleted simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)mac239 provirus that was tested as an attenuated proviral DNA vaccine by inoculation of female rhesus macaques. SIV-specific interferon-γ enzymelinked immunospot responses of low magnitude were observed after immunization with plasmid containing the vif-deleted SIV provirus. However, vaccinated animals displayed strong sustained virus-specific T cell proliferative responses and increasing antiviral antibody titers. These immune responses suggested either persistent vaccine plasmid expression or low level replication of vif-deleted SIV in the host. Immunized and unvaccinated macaques received a single high dose vaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251. A transient suppression of challenge virus load and a greater median survival time was observed for vaccinated animals. However, virus loads for vaccinated and unvaccinated macaques were comparable by twenty weeks after challenge and overall survival curves for the two groups were not significantly different. Thus, a vif-deleted SIVmac239 proviral DNA vaccine is immunogenic and capable of inducing a transient suppression of pathogenic challenge virus, despite severe attenuation of the vaccine virus. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: SIV; DNA vaccine; vif; Immunogenicity
Introduction The incidence of AIDS worldwide is rising, and the need continues for the development of an effective and safe vaccine against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), with the primary objective of arresting the spread of the AIDS epidemic.
⁎ Corresponding author. 2108 Tupper Hall, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Fax: +1 530 752 0414. E-mail address:
[email protected] (E.E. Sparger). 0042-6822/$ - see front matter © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2008.01.020
Studies in non-human primates with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) demonstrated efficacy for live-attenuated virus vaccines based on non-virulent cloned viral variants or clones engineered with deletions in viral various accessory genes including nef (Abel et al., 2003; Almond and Stott, 1999; Daniel et al., 1992; Lohman et al., 1994). However, subsequent studies revealed the potential for pathogenicity for live-attenuated SIV vaccine viruses for both neonatal and adult macaques (Baba et al., 1995, 1999; Hofmann-Lehmann et al., 2003). More recent studies have revealed vaccine induction of limited protection against pathogenic SIV or SHIV challenge with protection defined as
262
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
suppression of challenge virus loads, increased survival, and preservation of memory CD4 T cell populations. Vaccine approaches generating this type of efficacy include multi-gene DNA expression plasmids boosted with either recombinant viral vectors encoding viral genes or with cytokine adjuvants (Hokey and Weiner, 2006; Letvin, 2006; Lori et al., 2006). Nevertheless, optimization of different components of current vaccine strategies, or development of additional novel approaches, will be required to generate a truly effective AIDS vaccine. Several reports have also shown immunogenicity with limited efficacy for single modality DNA vaccines that are based on a replication-defective SIVor SHIV provirus encoding mutations within reverse transcriptase, integrase, or nucleocapsid genes (Akahata et al., 2000; Gorelick et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2006; Singh et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2000). Similarly, a previous study in our laboratory revealed some success for a highly attenuated vif-deleted feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) proviral DNA vaccine for inducing protection in cats against challenge with a wild type FIV, despite the severe restriction imposed on virus replication by deletion of the viral vif gene within the vaccine viral DNA (Lockridge et al., 2000). Although reports describing animal infection studies with vifdeleted lentiviruses have been limited, all have shown the absolute requirement for vif for detectable virus replication in vivo (Desrosiers et al., 1998; Gabuzda et al., 1994; Harmache et al., 1996; Inoshima et al., 1996; Kristbjornsdottir et al., 2004; Lockridge et al., 1999). Inoculation with lentviral vif mutants resulted in infections characterized by undetectable virus loads in peripheral blood and lymph nodes and by antiviral antibody responses in some animals that were measurable only by very sensitive antibody assays. These findings suggested the possibility that inoculation with a vif-deleted virus or proviral DNA results in either an abortive infection or a persistent infection with exceptionally low level replication. Importantly, observations from in vivo inoculation studies confirmed the severe attenuation associated with vif-deletion. In addition, mechanisms by which HIV-1 and SIV vif promote viral infectivity and replication in cell culture, were recently characterized by reports that revealed HIV-1 vif targets cellular cytidine deaminases of the human APOBEC3 family for proteosomal degradation by the vif gene product, thereby preventing virion incorporation of these antiviral cellular proteins (see review) (Cullen, 2006). These recent studies not only clarified the role of vif in the viral replication cycle, but also confirmed the critical requirement of this viral protein for HIV-1 and SIV infectivity and replication. The use of a vif-deleted provirus, as the basis for a DNA vaccine for AIDS, holds several potential advantages. Similar to replication-defective proviral DNA vaccines, a vif-deletion mutant provides a vector capable of expressing all viral genes, with the exception of vif, necessary for the assembly of virus particles. Moreover, virus produced from a vif-deletion mutant may not be truly defective, but instead may be highly restricted for replication, allowing for a slightly higher expression of viral immunogens than that observed with proviruses deleted for genes absolutely required for virus replication such as reverse transcriptase. Also, proviral DNA inoculation, in contrast to inoculation with virus particles, allows direct delivery of the
viral genome to host cells for those attenuated viruses of considerably lower infectivity as displayed by vif-deletion mutants. Lastly, immunization with a vif-deleted provirus plasmid combines the immunogenicity associated with plasmid DNA (see reviews) (Giri et al., 2004; Letvin, 2006) and attenuated virus vaccines. Based on these underlying principles, female rhesus macaques were immunized with a vif-deleted SIVmac239 provirus by DNA inoculation for the present study. Immunogenicity of this proviral DNA vaccine was examined by assays for SIV-specific cellular and humoral immune responses after DNA vaccination. Efficacy of this vif-deleted SIVmac239 proviral DNA vaccine was examined by challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251 by the vaginal route. This study revealed that a vif-deleted SIVmac239 proviral DNA vaccine was immunogenic, especially for virus-specific T cell proliferative responses, regardless of severe virus attenuation. Furthermore, immunization with this vif-deletion mutant resulted in restriction of challenge virus replication during the acute stage of infection with SIVmac251. Results and discussion Construction and replication of SIV/CMVΔvif To enhance expression of the proviral genome, the 5′ LTR of SIVmac239 was modified by the replacement of the U3 promoter domain with the enhancer region of the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early (IE) gene promoter. The vif-deleted SIVmac239 provirus encoding a 5′ hybrid LTR (CMV-LTR) is illustrated in Fig. 1A; construction of this clone utilized a previously described vif-deleted provirus (Zou and Luciw, 1996). To assess transcriptional activity of the chimeric LTR, transient expression assays were performed to compare luciferase reporter plasmids containing the hybrid LTR (pCMVLTR/Luc) and wild type SIVmac239 LTR (SIV-LTR/Luc). Assay for luciferase activity from transfected 293T cells showed a five-fold increase in activity directed by the hybrid LTR compared to that of wild type SIV-LTR (data not shown). Based on these findings and previous reports showing that expression vectors containing the CMV IE promoter or enhancer domains exhibit higher levels of expression (Galvin et al., 2000; Manthorpe et al., 1993), the genome of the SIVmac239Δvif provirus was modified by replacement of the 5′ LTR with that of the hybrid CMV-LTR. The provirus plasmid clone with this hybrid LTR was designated SIV/CMVΔvif and was used as the vaccine DNA in this study. Virus produced from the vaccine provirus SIV/CMVΔvif was assayed for replication in cell types either permissive or nonpermissive for vif-deleted SIVmac isolates, including SupT1 cells and rhesus peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), respectively. Virus production from PBMC infected with SIV/CMVΔvif virus was severely restricted although not completely ablated, with SIV p27Gag concentrations peaking at 3.5 to 3.9 ng per ml of cell culture supernatant (Fig. 1B). Similarly, SIV/CMVΔvif virus replication in rhesus MM221 cells (Fig. 1C) was also severely restricted compared to wild type SIVmac239, although this cell line appeared slightly more permissive for vif-deleted SIV replication
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
compared to rhesus PBMC. In contrast, replication of SIV/ CMVΔvif and wild type SIVmac239 was comparable in SupT1 cells (Fig. 1D). These findings confirmed that virus produced by plasmid SIV/CMVΔvif replicated in vitro similar to that previously shown for the progenitor provirus SIVmac239Δvif (Zou and Luciw, 1996).
263
Cellular immune responses induced by vaccination with SIV/ CMVΔvif proviral DNA The first objective of this study was to test the immunogenicity of the vaccine plasmid SIV/CMVΔvif by intradermal and intramuscular inoculation of six female rhesus macaques. An interferon (IFN)-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay, testing PBMC responses specific to four different SIV immunogens, revealed variable and relatively low activity at multiple time points after priming immunization (Fig. 2). This recombinant vaccinia-based ELISPOT assay was previously shown to reflect predominantly CD8 responses, as antigen is presented by the MHC class 1 pathway (Larsson et al., 1999). Responses were observed predominantly at early time points including two and six weeks after priming immunization and at two weeks after the first booster immunization. In addition, responses were detected in five of the six vaccinated macaques for at least one of the four immunogens tested. A higher frequency and magnitude of IFN-γ ELISPOT responses specific to SIV Gag and Nef were measured, whereas responses to Env and Pol were low or absent. Overall, IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were weak with the exception of one macaque (27101) who exhibited moderate to strong responses specific to Gag and Nef, respectively. T cell proliferative responses specific to inactivated purified SIV preparations were robust over most time points tested with all animals testing positive at two or more time points after immunization (Fig. 3A). These proliferative responses, presumably reflecting antigen-specific CD4 T cell activity, persisted after priming and the first booster immunizations. Interestingly, two vaccinated macaques showed stimulation indices (SI) of 45 and 65 at sixteen weeks after the first booster. Proliferative responses were high and surprisingly sustained, given that plasma viremia was not detected by real-time PCR assay for SIV RNA at various time points after proviral plasmid DNA inoculation (data not shown). Similarly, proviral DNA was also not detected in PBMC by a real-time PCR assay for SIV DNA (data not shown). Although proliferative responses measured by this particular assay have previously been shown to predominantly represent proliferating CD4 T cells, proliferation of antigenspecific CD8 T cells may also be measured by this assay based on aldrithiol-2 (AT-2)-inactivated SIVmac239 (Frank et al., 2003; Rutebemberwa et al., 2007). Nevertheless, the difference in magnitude between IFN-γ ELISPOT and T cell proliferative responses was considerable and possibly suggested that SIV/
Fig. 1. Construction and characterization of the SIV/CMVΔvif vaccine plasmid. A previously described vif-deleted SIVmac239 provirus (Zou and Luciw, 1996) was further modified by replacement of the 5′ LTR with a chimeric LTR that included substitution of a large segment of the U3 domain with the human CMV immediate early enhancer to create plasmid SIV/CMVΔvif (A). Replication of virus produced from 293T cells transfected with SIV/CMVΔvif plasmid was tested by inoculation of macaque PBMC (B) and a macaque T cell line MM221 cells (C) with supernatants harvested from transfected cells. Infected PBMC and MM221 cell culture supernatants were assayed over time for SIV capsid antigen as described in Materials and methods. SupT1 cells transfected with SIV/ CMVΔvif plasmid were also maintained in culture and assayed for SIV capsid antigen production (D).
264
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
cell proliferative responses observed with inoculation of a vifdeleted SIV provirus were notable and as high, or greater than, those observed for macaques infected with wild type SIVmac251, and tested by the same assay (Ma et al., 2004). Induction of strong virus-specific CD4 responses by cloned attenuated SIVmac239 isolates was reported previously, although the strength of responses was shown to be reduced with more severely attenuated SIV isolates compared to nefdeleted SIVmac239 (Gauduin et al., 1999, 2006). Vaccineinduced clonal expansion of CD4 T cells without full differentiation into mature CD4 effector cells may provide one possible explanation for the disproportion of antigen-specific
Fig. 2. SIV-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT responses elicited by immunization with SIV/CMVΔvif plasmid DNA. Virus-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were assayed on PBMC harvested from animals at various time points after vaccination. Immune responses to individual SIVmac239 proteins were measured using recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing either SIV Gag, Env, Nef or Pol with protocols described in Materials and methods. A value greater than 50 spotforming colonies (SFC) per 106 PBMC was considered significant for this assay. Arrows positioned at six and twenty two weeks after priming immunization denoted time points of booster vaccine inoculations.
CMVΔvif DNA immunization induced more potent virusspecific CD4 responses compared to CD8 responses, although specific cellular phenotypes associated with SIV-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT and proliferation were not tested. The SIV-specific T
Fig. 3. SIV-specific T cell proliferative and antiviral antibody responses elicited by immunization with SIV/CMVΔvif plasmid DNA. Virus-specific T cell proliferative responses directed to purified inactivated SIV were measured in PBMC collected from macaques at various time points after vaccination (A). Values for the highest SI to either 1 or 10 ng of inactivated SIV are shown. Reciprocal endpoint titers for plasma antibodies against native SIV Env were measured using a ConA ELISA with reciprocal log dilution values greater than 50 representing positive titers (see dashed cut line) (B). Antiviral antibodies were also assayed by a commercial HIV-1/HIV-2 ELISA as described in the text and are shown as reciprocal endpoint titers (C). Arrows positioned at six and twenty two weeks after priming immunization denoted time points of booster vaccine inoculations.
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
IFN-γ ELISPOT and proliferation responses detected after immunization with SIV/CMVΔvif DNA (Bayry et al., 2007; Spörri and Reis e Sousa, 2007). Similarly, recent studies have reported induction of antigen-specific CD4 T cells without helper function as a result of CD4 T cell activation by incompletely matured dendritic cells (Spörri and Reis e Sousa, 2007). A definitive elucidation of mechanisms for the differential induction of cellular responses by the SIV/CMVΔvif proviral DNA vaccine will require additional studies focused on phenotypic and polyfunctional characterization of virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells. Antiviral antibody responses elicited by immunization with SIV/ CMVΔvif proviral DNA Low to undetectable antibody responses have been detected in infection studies with vif-deleted lentiviruses (Desrosiers et al., 1998; Gupta et al., 2007; Harmache et al., 1996; Inoshima et al., 1996; Lockridge et al., 2000). Therefore a sensitive concanavalin A (ConA) ELISA for detection of antibody to native SIV Env was used to assay antiviral antibodies after immunization with SIV/ CMVΔvif proviral DNA. Results of the ConA ELISA revealed that only one animal was positive for Env antibody at six weeks after priming immunization, whereas five of six animals demonstrated either transient, low (1:100) to higher (1:800) antibody titers at two weeks after the first booster inoculation (Fig. 3B). Env antibody titers ranging from 1:800 to 1:3200 were detected for all six vaccinated macaques by two weeks after the booster inoculation. Low titer antiviral antibodies were also detected by commercial HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody ELISA for two vaccinated macaques after the first booster immunization and for all vaccinees after the second booster vaccination (Fig. 3C). Although antibody titers measured for vaccinated macaques by both assays were considerably lower than those reported for animals infected with wild type and some attenuated SIVmac isolates, detection of antibody by the commercial assay was unexpected based on previous reports of infection studies with vif-deleted lentiviruses (Desrosiers et al., 1998; Harmache et al., 1996; Inoshima et al., 1996; Kristbjornsdottir et al., 2004; Lockridge et al., 2000). However, previous studies of vif-deleted lentiviruses frequently used a single inoculation of virus particles for infection rather than multiple proviral DNA inoculations. Therefore, differences in route and number of inoculations, and the use of a provirus directed by the hybrid CMV-LTR, may have accounted for the emergence of increasing antibody titers observed for SIV/ CMVΔvif-immunized macaques in this study. Regardless, these observations of both higher than expected humoral responses and sustained SIV-specific T cell proliferative responses suggested either persistent expression of this vaccine provirus plasmid or SIVΔvif virus replication of very low magnitude. Effects of immunization with SIV/CMVΔvif proviral DNA on peripheral blood virus loads and CD4 T cell concentrations after vaginal challenge with SIVmac251 The second objective of this study was to test the efficacy of vif-deleted SIV proviral DNA vaccine against vaginal challenge
265
with the highly pathogenic isolate SIVmac251. All vaccinated macaques became viremic after vaginal challenge, whereas one unvaccinated control remained negative for plasma viral RNA for all time points tested after challenge (Fig. 4A and B). Although mean plasma virus loads, measured as viral RNA copies per ml, were lower for vaccinated macaques compared to unvaccinated controls over the first sixteen weeks after vaginal challenge, differences in loads between the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 1.2–1.5) during the first eight weeks post-challenge with analyses including unvaccinated control macaque (30037) that remained uninfected after challenge. However, statistical analysis revealed significant differences between virus loads for the animal groups at two (P = 0.026), four (P = 0.004), and eight (P = 0.041) weeks after challenge when this uninfected control animal was excluded from the analysis (Fig. 4C). By twenty weeks after challenge, mean virus loads were similar between vaccinated macaques and unvaccinated controls. Importantly, three of the five infected animals within the unvaccinated control group were rapid progressors and euthanized due to SIV-associated illnesses, including diarrhea and weight loss, by sixteen weeks after challenge (Fig. 4B). In contrast, only one out of six vaccinated and infected animals was euthanized within this same time period (Fig. 4A). Study animals were maintained up to 12–14 months after challenge to determine effects on long-term survival imposed by vaccination. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a difference in median survival times for vaccinees (fifty one weeks) and unvaccinated controls (sixteen weeks) (Fig. 4D). Therefore an enhanced survival rate during the acute phase of infection and a greater median survival time was observed for vaccinated animals. However, long-term survival of animals from both groups were comparable, with two vaccinated and two unvaccinated animals controlling virus loads to approximately 5 × 105 RNA copies per ml of plasma at the termination of the study. All six vaccinated animals demonstrated a precipitous decline in the peripheral blood CD4 T cell population within two weeks after challenge followed by a stabilization of values for the percentages of this T cell subset (Fig. 5A). The CD4 T cell decline at two weeks post-challenge produced a significant difference between mean values for peripheral blood CD4 T cell percentages in SIV-infected vaccinees and unvaccinated controls (P = 0.015) (Fig. 5B). One possible cause for the accelerated CD4 T cell depletion upon challenge would be a vaccineinduced expansion of SIV-specific CD4 T cell population as indicated by the strong T cell proliferative responses detected after immunization. This potential mechanism is supported by findings from other studies showing preferential infection by HIV-1 for virus-specific CD4 T cell populations (Douek et al., 2002; Harari et al., 2002). In contrast, unvaccinated viremic control animals experienced a slower progressive reduction in CD4 T cell percentages that occurred over an eight week time period after challenge. Nevertheless, the abrupt reduction in the peripheral blood CD4 T cell population in vaccinated macaques was associated with lower peripheral blood virus loads at early time points post-challenge, when compared to unvaccinated controls (Fig. 4A). Two of the three unvaccinated animals were euthanized by sixteen weeks after challenge due to SIV-related
266
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
Fig. 4. Plasma virus loads and survival after vaginal challenge of vaccinated and unvaccinated macaques with SIVmac251. Plasma viremia measured as SIV RNA copies per ml of plasma, was determined after SIVmac251 challenge by a real-time RT-PCR assay for SIV gag RNA for vaccinated (A) and unvaccinated (B) macaques. Mean values for plasma viral RNA loads over time are shown with standard error bars for vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals (C). The asterisk (⁎) positioned over values at two, four and eight weeks after challenge indicates a significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated controls with P values of 0.026, 0.004, and 0.041 determined by a Mann–Whitney-U test, when the uninfected control animal #30037 is excluded from the analysis. The limit of this real-time RT-PCR assay for SIV RNA is 100 RNA copies per ml of plasma. A Kaplan–Meier survival curve was generated for vaccinated and unvaccinated animals after SIVmac251 challenge (D). Median survival time for vaccines was fifty one weeks, whereas median survival for unvaccinated controls was sixteen weeks. However, a comparison of the two survival curves performed by a log-rank test (GraphPad Prism) revealed no significant difference between the curves for vaccinated and unvaccinated animals. Note that x-axis scales are uneven to allow better visualization of values for early time points after challenge.
clinical disease; however, these animals did not exhibit significant changes in CD4 T cell counts during the acute phase of challenge infection. Percentages of CD4 T cells were comparable for both vaccinated and unvaccinated macaques by four weeks after challenge and remained relatively stable and similar for those animals in both groups that survived until termination of the study. The role of major histocompatibility complex class I haplotypes in control of virus load for macaques involved in this vaccine study was unclear as all animals were negative for the rhesus macaque Mamu-A⁎01 allele. Two of the five vaccinated animals (26349 and 27513) that survived past the acute phase of SIVmac251 infection, were positive for the rhesus macaque Mamu-B⁎17 haplotype previously considered to be predictive of control of SIVmac239 virus load and disease progression (O'Connor et al., 2003; Yant et al., 2006). However, findings from a more recent report indicated that inheritance of this haplotype was not predictive for control of SIVmac239 (Wojcechowskyj et al., 2007). Taken as a whole, these observations indicated that a single modality vaccine composed of a vif-deleted SIVmac239 proviral plasmid was capable of reducing virus loads and mortality during the acute phase of SIVmac251 infection. However, vaccination was not effective for inducing sustained control of challenge virus replication or
virus-associated peripheral blood CD4 T cell depletion after high dose vaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251. Cellular immune responses after challenge with SIVmac251 For vaccinated macaques, the SIVmac251 challenge induced a rapid ablation of SIV-specific proliferative responses that had been moderate to robust just prior to challenge (Fig. 3A). SIVspecific proliferative responses were entirely suppressed in all vaccinated animals and also absent in unvaccinated controls at two weeks after challenge (Fig. 5C). By four weeks after challenge, low to moderate proliferative responses were observed in two vaccinated and two unvaccinated macaques; this most likely reflected responses related to virus replication rather than recall responses associated with vaccination, with the exception of responses demonstrated by one unvaccinated macaque (30037). Interestingly, proliferative responses were observed for this particular control animal that appeared to resist infection with SIVmac251 based on the absence of a detectable plasma viremia, antiviral antibody, and SIV-associated disease throughout the 12 month period of assessment after challenge. Proliferative responses observed for this unvaccinated macaque substantiated exposure to challenge virus and suggested transient
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
267
Fig. 5. Quantitation of CD4 T cell populations and SIV-specific T cell proliferative responses after challenge with SIVmac251. Percentages of CD4 T cells were calculated for vaccinated and unvaccinated control macaques after SIVmac251 challenge (A). Mean values with standard error for CD4 T cell percentages over time challenge are shown for both groups of animals (B). The asterisk (⁎) positioned over values at two weeks after challenge indicates a significant difference between vaccinated and SIV-infected unvaccinated controls with a P value of 0.015 determined by a Mann–Whitney-U test. Virus-specific T cell proliferative responses are also shown for vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals at two and four weeks after challenge (C). Note that x-axis scales are uneven to allow better visualization of values for early time points after challenge.
virus replication that was subsequently controlled sufficiently to prevent detection of infection by standard assays used in this study. Extended follow-up assessment of this animal beyond 12 months after challenge and assay of multiple lymphoid tissues for the presence of SIV proviral DNA at necropsy would be necessary to determine if this animal suffered an occult infection as previously described by McChesney et al. (1998) or completely resisted SIVmac251 infection. Virus-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were variable but mostly low to absent after challenge for all vaccinated macaques (Fig. 6A). The one vaccinated animal (27101) that exhibited moderate to low ELISPOT responses consistently at time points both before and after challenge, exhibited declining responses by twelve weeks after challenge. These declining responses were coincident with a progressive reduction in peripheral blood CD4 T cells over the sixteen week time period after challenge (Fig. 5A), at which time the animal was euthanized. Measurable IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to SIV were not detected in unvaccinated animals after challenge (Fig. 6B). In general, IFN-γ ELISPOT responses observed for vaccinated animals were reduced, compared to responses prior to challenge, and were comparable to those measured for unvaccinated control animals, with the exception of two vaccinated animals (27101 and 27674). Weak SIV-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT responses in vaccinated animals after vaccination and challenge suggested a poor virusspecific CD8 T cell response was induced by this plasmid vaccine. The absence of a protective SIV-specific CD8 T cell response may have augmented the susceptibility of virus-specific CD4 T cells during the acute phase of infection. Accordingly, an
enhanced susceptibility of virus-specific CD4 T cells to infection as previously described (Brenchley et al., 2004), combined with insufficient virus-specific CD8 activity could possibly explain both the abrupt but transient depletion of peripheral blood CD4 T cells and absolute ablation of previously strong proliferative responses observed for vaccinated animals during the very early acute phase of stage of infection. Furthermore, a more recent study suggested that the preponderance of HIV-1-specific CD4 T cells in infected patients are of a less mature phenotype and may be more susceptible to infection and depletion by HIV-1 when compared to terminally differentiated virus-specific CD4 T cells (Brenchley et al., 2006). The possibility of induction of incompletely differentiated virus-specific CD4 T cells by SIV/ CMVΔvif plasmid vaccine may also directly relate to the disparity observed between SIV-specific T cell proliferative and IFN-γ ELISPOT responses noted in vaccinated macaques, as well as the rapid drop in CD4 T cell percentages after challenge. Future studies characterizing T cell phenotypes represented by these IFN-γ ELISPOT responses and proliferative responses, as well as testing for additional cellular immune response functions including antigen-specific induction of expression of different cytokines and degranulation markers, will be necessary to address these issues and to fully characterize SIV/CMVΔvif DNA-induced cellular responses. SIV Env antibody responses after challenge with SIVmac251 SIV envelope-specific antibody titers increased by ten-fold or more over base-line titers for five of six vaccinated animals by
268
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
Fig. 6. IFN-γ ELISPOT responses in animals challenged with SIVmac251. Virus-specific IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were measured for vaccinated (A) and all unvaccinated control (B) animals for early time points after challenge.
two weeks after SIVmac251 challenge. In contrast, measurable antibody titers were not detected until four weeks after challenge in unvaccinated animals, with only three of the six animals demonstrating SIV Env antibody (Fig. 7A). One of the three antibody-negative unvaccinated controls was also negative for plasma viremia and appeared resistant to SIVmac251 challenge (Fig. 4B). The absence of SIV antibodies for the remaining two unvaccinated animals was expected because these two animals (24078 and 30839) proved to be rapid progressors that were euthanized at sixteen weeks after challenge due to SIV-associated clinical illness. These findings suggested that the rise in antibody titers detected for vaccinated animals within two weeks of challenge most likely reflected vaccine-related anamnestic responses. By eight weeks after challenge, Env-specific antibody titers were comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals and did not correlate with suppression of virus loads.
Increasing Env-specific antibody avidity was observed over the eight week time period after challenge for four of the six vaccinated macaques and for two of three unvaccinated animals that were antibody-positive (Fig. 7B). In contrast, the unvaccinated animal (24759) that exhibited a decrease in antibody avidity between four and eight weeks after challenge, was also a rapid progressor that was euthanized at sixteen weeks after challenge. Otherwise, antibody avidity responses were comparable between vaccinated macaques and unvaccinated controls by eight weeks after challenge with the exception of one vaccinated animal (27513) that exhibited a significantly higher avidity compared to all other animals. Overall, the magnitude of Env antibody titer and avidity did not correlate with suppression of virus load after challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251, although the absence of antibody was associated with rapid disease progression. Importantly, high SIV-specific antibody responses
Fig. 7. Antiviral antibody responses in animals challenged with SIVmac251. Reciprocal endpoint titers for plasma antibodies against native SIV Env were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals over consecutive time points (A). Reciprocal endpoint titers greater than 50 were considered positive. Avidity of SIV Env antibodies were also determined after challenge and compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals (B).
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
were not predicted given that this vaccine approach consisted of a single modality extremely attenuated proviral DNA vaccine that lacked booster immunizations with viral antigens expressed from a viral vector or as protein subunits. However, future examination for neutralizing antibody responses will be necessary to provide a more complete analysis of humoral responses induced by this single modality proviral DNA vaccine. The question remains as to whether this vif-deleted SIV provirus plasmid functioned as a highly attenuated virus or as a defective proviral DNA vaccine. Regardless, the results of this study supported the “threshold hypothesis” which states that immunization efficacy is directly related to the extent of vaccine virus replication in vivo (Johnson et al., 1999; Ruprecht et al., 1996). Despite the fact that vaccine-induced suppression of challenge virus loads was insufficient to provide sustained control of virus infection after a highly pathogenic SIVmac251 challenge, SIV/CMVΔvif plasmid immunization generated cellular and humoral responses that were consistent with, or actually improved over those reported for other vif-deleted lentivirus infections and for defective SIV or SHIV proviral DNA vaccines (Akahata et al., 2000; Gorelick et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2006; Singh et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2000). Correlates for vaccine-induced suppression of challenge virus loads during acute infection were not readily apparent. However, strong SIVspecific T cell proliferative responses, and increasing antiviral antibody titers associated with booster immunizations, suggested either persistent vaccine plasmid expression or low level SIVΔvif replication in the host. Additional studies examining SIV/CMVΔvif proviral DNA-inoculated macaques for tissue reservoirs of either replicating SIVΔvif virus, or persistent SIV/ CMVΔvif plasmid, will be required to determine the origin for the enhanced proliferative and antibody responses observed for this vif-deleted proviral DNA vaccine. The immunogenicity, limited suppression of challenge virus loads, and improved median survival time associated with this vif-deleted SIVmac239 proviral DNA vaccine, supports further examination of this proviral DNA vaccine as a component of multiple modality vaccine approaches that include immunogens expressed by viral vectors, as well as co-immunization with vectors expressing immunomodulators. Materials and methods Plasmid vaccine preparation The proviral DNA genome of a previously described SIV vif-deletion mutant, SIVmac239Δvif (Zou and Luciw, 1996), was modified by the replacement of the 5′ LTR with a hybrid LTR encoding the enhancer region of the human CMV IE gene promoter. Briefly, a hybrid LTR (CMV-LTR) encoding a 514 nt fragment of the CMV IE promoter with enhancer elements, nucleotides-1 to -53 of the U3 domain, and the R and U5 domains of SIVmac239 LTR, was constructed by standard molecular cloning strategies. Next, reporter plasmids encoding the luciferase gene directed by either the hybrid CMV-LTR (pCMV-LTR/Luc) or the wild type SIVmac239 LTR (SIV-LTR/ Luc) were also prepared. Finally, the hybrid CMV-LTR was
269
substituted for the 5′LTR of vif-deletion mutant SIVmac239Δvif for construction of a SIVmac239-based provirus directed by a potentially stronger promoter. The SIVmac239Δvif plasmid encoding the 5′ hybrid LTR was further modified by replacement of the truncated nef gene encoded by the original pMA239 provirus plasmid used to construct SIVmac239Δvif, by insertion of a nef-containing subgenomic fragment from SIVmac239/nef-open to produce the vaccine provirus plasmid SIV/CMVΔvif (Fig. 1A). The structure of this vaccine provirus was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. Vaccine plasmid DNA (SIV/CMVΔvif) was purified using a commercial Endofree kit (DNA Maxi prep; Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and tested for endotoxin concentrations with a commercial kit (E-Toxate, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Replication assays for vaccine provirus plasmid Replication of SIV/CMVΔvif was tested by transfection of the SupT1 cell line, and by infection of rhesus macaque PBMC and the macaque MM221 T cell line (provided by Ronald Desrosiers, New England Primate Research Center). SupT1 cells, human embryonic kidney 293T cells, and MM221 T cells were cultured using protocols previously described (Himathongkham et al., 2002; Zou and Luciw, 1996). Rhesus macaque PBMC were prepared by Ficoll–Hypaque density centrifugation and cultivated as previously described (Himathongkham et al., 2002). For assay of replication in the SupT1 cell line, cells were transfected with provirus plasmids (5 μg) including SIV/CMVΔvif and SIVmac239/nef-open using electroporation protocols previously reported (Zou and Luciw, 1996). To assess SIV/CMVΔvif replication in MM221 cells and macaque PBMC, plasmids were first transfected into 293T cells using Fugene 6 lipofection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, RMB, Indianapolis, IN) according to previously described protocols (Gemeniano et al., 2004). Supernatants were harvested from transfected 293T cells two days later and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. MM221 cells and PBMC (1.5 × 106 cells) were washed in RPMI media and re-suspended in 0.5 ml of filtered transfected cell supernatant for a 3 h incubation at 37 °C. Cells were next washed twice with RPMI media and then cultivated using previously described protocols (Himathongkham et al., 2002). Cell culture supernatants from provirus plasmid-transfected SupT1 cells and infected cultures of MM221 cells and macaque PBMC were collected every three to four days and assayed by a commercial ELISA (Coulter, Hialeah, FL) for SIV p27Gag concentrations. DNA immunization and virus challenge Animals used in this study included colony-bred, multiparous female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) housed at the California National Primate Research Center and previously determined to be negative for antibodies to simian type D retrovirus, SIV, HIV-2, and simian T cell leukemia virus type 1. Tissue typing demonstrated that all animals were negative for the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I allele Mamu-A⁎01 and two animals within the vaccine group (26349 and 27513) were positive for MHC class 1 allele Mamu-B⁎17.
270
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
Animals were housed and maintained according to regulations and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use committee. Physical examinations were performed at regular time intervals for body weight, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and opportunistic infections. Clinical criteria for euthanasia included three or more of the following; a greater than 10% loss of body weight, chronic diarrhea unresponsive to therapy, persistent infections unresponsive to therapy, persistent dehydration without fluid supplementation, and persistent and marked hematologic abnormalities. For this vaccine study, six female rhesus macaques were inoculated with 600 μg of SIV/CMVΔvif plasmid DNA by the intramuscular route and 400 μg of vaccine DNA by the intradermal route to constitute a total vaccine DNA inoculum of 1 mg. At six weeks and twenty two weeks after priming immunization, animals received booster inoculations of SIV/ CMVΔvif plasmid DNA 1 mg; these inoculations were divided between intramuscular and intradermal routes as described for the initial immunization. At twenty six weeks after the priming immunization (four weeks after the second booster inoculation), vaccinated animals and six unvaccinated control female rhesus macaques were challenged by the vaginal route using protocols and a SIVmac251 virus stock previously described (Marthas et al., 2001). Briefly, animals received two intravaginal inoculations of 1 ml undiluted SIVmac251 stock containing 1 × 105 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) with these two inoculations separated by a 4 h time period over one day. Blood samples were collected at two to four week intervals after immunization and challenge for assessment of virus-specific immune responses and monitoring for hematologic alterations by complete blood cell count and CD4/CD8 subset analysis. Virus load determination Viral RNA concentrations in plasma were measured using a previously described real-time reverse transcriptase (RT) TaqMan PCR assay with a sensitivity limit of 50–100 copies of SIV RNA per ml of plasma (Leutenegger et al., 2001). Briefly, viral RNA extracted from plasma with a commercial kit (QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit; Qiagen, Valencia CA) was amplified in a single step RT-PCR reaction using previously described conditions and primers (SIV510f and SIV592r), TaqMan probe (SIV535p) specific for SIVmac 251 gag, MMLV-RT (Applied Biosystems), and AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase. For assay of PBMC for proviral DNA, genomic DNA was extracted with a commercial kit (DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit; Qiagen) and processed using the Applied Biosystems 6100 Nucleic Acid Prep Station. Real-time PCR conditions for detection of cellassociated viral DNA were previously described (Leutenegger et al., 2001) and included assay for rhesus IL-2 as a housekeeping gene for all reactions. All reactions were carried out in an ABI PRISM Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems).
using a traditional assay based on 3H-labeled thymidine incorporation as previously described (Abel et al., 2003; McChesney et al., 1998). AT-2-inactivated SIV (kindly provided by Jeff Lifson, Laboratory of Retroviral Pathogenesis, SAIC Frederick, Bethesda, MD) in concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 ng per well in a 96-well plate, served as viral antigen. IFN-γ ELISPOT assay Cryopreserved PBMC were tested in duplicate using a previously described recombinant vaccinia virus (r-VV)-based ELISPOT assay for detection of antigen-specific IFN-γ expression (Larsson et al., 1999; Shacklett et al., 2002). Recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing SIVmac251 Gag (vAbT252), Env (vAbT2531), Pol (vAbt258), and Nef or control r-VV (Therion Biological, Cambridge, MA) were used as antigens. After an overnight incubation with r-VV, PBMC were transferred to a 96well ELISPOT plate (U-Cytech, Utrecht, The Netherlands) coated with monoclonal antibody specific for macaque IFN-γ. Spot-forming cells (SFC) were counted using a digital ELISPOT reader (AID, Automimmun Diagnostika, Cell Technology Inc., Columbia MD). Results were presented as SFC per 106 cells after subtraction of background SFC measured for control vaccinia virus. Values greater than 50 SFC per 106 cells, were considered positive. Antibody assays Plasma antibodies specific to SIVmac were assayed after vaccination and challenged using a commercial HIV-1/HIV-2 ELISA (Genetics Systems Corporation, Redmond, Washington). Plasma antibodies reactive to native SIV envelope proteins were measured with a previously described ConA ELISA (Cole et al., 1997). However, a four-fold increase in concentration of SIVmac239 virus was used to coat ELISA plates to enhance the sensitivity of this ELISA. Avidity of plasma antibodies to native envelope proteins was determined by measuring resistance of antibody-envelope glycoprotein complexes to 8 M urea in a ConA ELISA (Cole et al., 1997). The avidity index calculation was based on the following equation: (OD450 of phosphate buffered saline-washed wells / OD450 of urea-washed wells) × 100%. Statistics Graphs and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism using the Mann–Whitney-U test for comparison of virus loads and CD4 T cell percentages between vaccinated and unvaccinated control animals after challenge. P values of b 0.05 were considered significant. A survival curve and analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method (GraphPad Prism). Acknowledgments
T cell proliferation assay SIV-specific T cell proliferation responses were assayed in freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)
The authors gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Lou Adamson, Karen Shaw, Joanne Higgins, and Ding Lu (University of California Primate Center Immunology
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
Core). We would also like to thank Jonathon Steckbeck (University of Pittsburgh) and Catherine Cox (Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology). The authors also acknowledge helpful discussions and consultations with Christopher Miller, Michael McChesney, and Gary Rhodes. Interleukin-2 for cell culture, was provided by the AIDS Reference and Reagent Program. This research was supported by NIH/NAIAD grants R01AI49703 (E. E. Sparger), R0152058 (K. S. Cole) and in part by the Base Grant (RR00169) to the California National Primate Research Center (P. A. Luciw). References Abel, K., Compton, L., Rourke, T., Montefiori, D., Lu, D., Rothaeusler, K., Fritts, L., Bost, K., Miller, C.J., 2003. Simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6-induced protection against intravaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac239 is independent of the route of immunization and is associated with a combination of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and alpha interferon responses. J. Virol 77, 3099–3118. Akahata, W., Ido, E., Shimada, T., Katsuyama, K., Yamamoto, H., Uesaka, H., Ui, M., Kuwata, T., Takahashi, H., Hayami, M., 2000. DNA vaccination of macaques by a full genome HIV-1 plasmid which produces noninfectious virus particles. Virology 275, 116–124. Almond, N., Stott, J., 1999. Live attenuated SIV—a model of a vaccine for AIDS. Immunol. Lett 66, 167–170. Baba, T.W., Jeong, Y.S., Pennick, D., Bronson, R., Greene, M.F., Ruprecht, R.M., 1995. Pathogenicity of live attenuated SIV after mucosal infection of neonatal macaques. Science 267, 1820–1825. Baba, T.W., Liska, V., Khimani, A.H., Ray, N.B., Dailey, P.J., Penninck, D., Bronson, R., Greene, M.F., McClure, H.M., Martin, L.N., Ruprecht, R.M., 1999. Live attenuated, multiply deleted simian immunodeficiency virus causes AIDS in infant and adult macaques. Nat. Med 5, 194–203. Bayry, J., Triebel, F., Kaveri, S.V., Tough, D.F., 2007. Human dendritic cells acquire a semimature phenotype and lymph node homing potential through interaction with CD4+CD25+regulatory T cells. J. Immunol 178, 4184–4193. Brenchley, J.M., Hill, B.J., Ambrozak, D.R., Price, D.A., Guenaga, F.J., Casazza, J.P., Kuruppu, J., Yazdani, J., Migueles, S.A., Connors, M., Roederer, M., Douek, D.C., Koup, R.A., 2004. T-cell subsets that harbor human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in vivo: implications for HIV pathogenesis. J. Virol 78, 1160–1168. Brenchley, J.M., Ruff, L.E., Casazza, J.P., Koup, R.A., Price, D.A., Douek, D.C., 2006. Preferential infection shortens the life span of human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD4+ T cells in vivo. J. Virol 80, 6801–6809. Cole, K.S., Rowles, J.L., Jagerski, B.A., Murphey-Corb, M., Unangst, T., Clements, J.E., Robinson, J., Wyand, M.S., Desrosiers, R.C., Montelaro, R.C., 1997. Evolution of envelope-specific antibody responses in monkeys experimentally infected or immunized with simian immunodeficiency virus and its association with the development of protective immunity. J. Virol 71, 5069–5079. Cullen, B.R., 2006. Role and mechanism of action of the APOBEC3 family of antiretroviral resistance factors. J. Virol 80, 1067–1076. Daniel, M.D., Kirchhoff, F., Czajak, S.C., Sehgal, P.K., Desrosiers, R.C., 1992. Protective effects of a live attenuated SIV vaccine with a deletion in the nef gene. Science 258, 1938–1941. Desrosiers, R.C., Lifson, J.D., Gibbs, J.S., Czajak, S.C., Howe, A.Y., Arthur, L.O., Johnson, R.P., 1998. Identification of highly attenuated mutants of simian immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol 72, 1431–1437. Douek, D.C., Brenchley, J.M., Betts, M.R., Ambrozak, D.R., Hill, B.J., Y.O., Casazza, J.P., Kuruppu, J., Kunstman, K., Wolinsky, S., Grossman, Z., Dybul, M., Oxenius, A., Price, D.A., Connors, M., Koup, R.A., 2002. HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4+ T cells. Nature 417, 95–98. Frank, I., Santos, J.J., Mehlhop, E., Villamide-Herrera, L., Santisteban, C., Gettie, A., Ignatius, R., Lifson, J.D., Pope, M., 2003. Presentation of exogenous whole inactivated simian immunodeficiency virus by mature dendritic cells induces CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr 334, 7–19.
271
Gabuzda, D.H., Li, H., Lawrence, K., Vasir, B.S., Crawford, K., Langhoff, E., 1994. Essential role of vif in establishing productive HIV-1 infection in peripheral blood T lymphocytes and monocyte/macrophages. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr 7, 908–915. Galvin, T.A., Muller, J., Khan, A.S., 2000. Effect of different promoters on immune responses elicited by HIV-1 gag/Env multigenic DNA vaccine in Macaca mulatta and Macaca nemestrina. Vaccine 18, 2566–2583. Gauduin, M.C., Glickman, R.L., Ahmad, S., Yilma, T., Johnson, R.P., 1999. Immunization with live attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus induces strong type 1 T helper responses and beta-chemokine production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 14031–14036. Gauduin, M.C., Yu, Y., Barabasz, A., Carville, A., Piatak, M., Lifson, J.D., Desrosiers, R.C., Johnson, R.P., 2006. Induction of a virus-specific effectormemory CD4+ T cell response by attenuated SIV infection. J. Exp. Med 203, 2661–2672. Gemeniano, M.C., Sawai, E.T., Sparger, E.E., 2004. Feline immunodeficiency virus Orf-A localizes to the nucleus and induces cell cycle arrest. Virology 325, 167–174. Giri, M., Ugen, K.E., Weiner, D.B., 2004. DNA vaccines against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the past decade. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 17, 370–389. Gorelick, R.J., Benveniste, R.E., Lifson, J.D., Yovandich, J.L., Morton, W.R., Kuller, L., Flynn, B.M., Fisher, B.A., Rossio, J.L., Piatak, M., Bess, J.W., Henderson, L.E., Arthur, L.O., 2000. Protection of Macaca nemestrina from disease following pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus challenge: utilization of SIV nucleocapsid mutant DNA vaccines with and without an SIV boost. J. Virol 74, 11935–11949. Gupta, S., Leutenegger, C.M., Dean, G.A., Steckbeck, J.D., Cole, K.S., Sparger, E.E., 2007. Vaccination of cats with attenuated feline immunodeficiency virus proviral DNA vaccine expressing gamma interferon. J. Virol 81, 465–473. Harari, A., Rizzardi, G.P., Ellefsen, K., Ciuffreda, D., Champagne, P., Bart, P.A., Kaufmann, D., Telenti, A., Sahli, R., Tambussi, G., Kaiser, L., Lazzarin, A., Perrin, L., Pantaleo, G., 2002. Analysis of HIV-1-and CMV-specific memory CD4 T-cell responses during primary and chronic infection. Blood 100, 1381–1387. Harmache, A., Russo, P., Guiguen, F., Vitu, C., Vignoni, M., Bouyac, M., Hieblot, C., Pepin, M., Vigne, R., Suzan, M., 1996. Requirement of caprine arthritis encephalitis virus vif gene for in vivo replication. Virology 224, 246–255. Himathongkham, S., Douglas, G.C., Fang, A., Yu, E., Barnett, S.W., Luciw, P.A., 2002. Species tropism of chimeric SHIV clones containing HIV-1 subtype-A and subtype-E envelope genes. Virology 298, 189–199. Hofmann-Lehmann, R., Vlasak, J., Williams, A.L., Chenine, A.L., McClure, H.M., Anderson, D.C., O'Neil, S., Ruprecht, R.M., 2003. Live attenuated, nef-deleted SIV is pathogenic in most adult macaques after prolonged observation. AIDS 17, 157–166. Hokey, D.A., Weiner, D.B., 2006. DNA vaccines for HIV: challenges and opportunities. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 28, 267–279. Inoshima, Y., Kohmoto, M., Ikeda, Y., Yamada, H., Kawaguchi, Y., Tomonaga, K., Miyazawa, T., Kai, C., Umemura, T., Mikami, T., 1996. Roles of the auxiliary genes and AP-1 binding site in the long terminal repeat of feline immunodeficiency virus in the early stage of infection in cats. J. Virol 70, 8518–8526. Johnson, R.P., Lifson, J.D., Czajak, S.C., Cole, K.S., Manson, K.H., Glickman, R., Yang, J., Montefiori, D.C., Montelaro, R., Wyand, M.S., Desrosiers, R.C., 1999. Highly attenuated vaccine strains of simian immunodeficiency virus protect against vaginal challenge: inverse relationship of degree of protection with level of attenuation. J. Virol 73, 4952–4961. Kristbjornsdottir, H.B., Andresdottir, V., Svansson, V., Torsteinsdottir, S., Matthiasdottir, S., Andresson, O.S., 2004. The vif gene of maedi-visna virus is essential for infectivity in vivo and in vitro. Virology 318, 350–359. Larsson, M., Jin, X., Ramratnam, B., Ogg, G.S., Engelmayer, J., Demoitie, M.A., McMichael, A.J., Cox, W.I., Steinman, R.M., Nixon, D., Bhardwaj, N., 1999. A recombinant vaccinia virus based ELISPOT assay detects high frequencies of Pol-specific CD8 T cells in HIV-1-positive individuals. AIDS 13, 767–777. Letvin, N.L., 2006. Progress and obstacles in the development of an AIDS vaccine. Nat. Rev. Immunol 6, 930–939.
272
E.E. Sparger et al. / Virology 374 (2008) 261–272
Leutenegger, C.M., Higgins, J., Matthews, T., Tarantal, A.F., Luciw, P.A., Pedersen, N.C., North, T.W., 2001. Real-time TaqMan® PCR as a specific and more sensitive alternative to the branched-chain DNA assay for quantitation of simian immunodeficiency virus RNA. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 17, 243–251. Liu, Z., Singh, D.K., Sheffer, D., Smith, M.S., Dhillon, S., Chebloune, Y., Hegde, R., Buch, S., Narayan, O., 2006. Immunoprophylaxis against AIDS in macaques with a lentiviral DNA vaccine. Virology 351, 444–454. Lockridge, K.M., Himathongkham, S., Sawai, E.T., Chienand, M., Sparger, E.E., 1999. The feline immunodeficiency virus vif gene is required for productive infection of feline peripheral blood mononuclear cells and monocyte-derived macrophages. Virology 261, 25–30. Lockridge, K., Chien, M., Luciw, P.A., Sparger, E.E., 2000. Protective immunity against feline immunodeficiency virus induced by inoculation with vifdeleted proviral DNA. Virology 273, 67–79. Lohman, B.L., McChesney, M.B., Miller, C.J., McGowan, E., Joye, S.M., Van Rompay, K., Reay, E., Antipa, L., Pedersen, N., Marthas, M.L., 1994. A partially attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus induces host immunity that correlates with resistance to pathogenic virus challenge. J. Virol 68, 7021–7029. Lori, F., Weiner, D.B., Calarota, S.A., Kelly, L.M., Lisziewicz, J., 2006. Cytokine-adjuvanted HIV-DNA vaccination strategies. Springer Semin. Immunopathol 28, 231–238. Ma, Z.M., Abel, K., Rourke, T., Wang, Y., Miller, C.J., 2004. A period of transient viremia and occult infection precedes persistent viremia and antiviral immune responses during multiple low-dose intravaginal simian immunodeficiency virus inoculations. J. Virol 78, 14048–14052. Manthorpe, M., Cornefert-Jensen, F., Hartikka, J., Felgner, J., Rundell, A., Margalith, M., Dwarki, V., 1993. Gene therapy by intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA: studies on firefly luciferase gene expression in mice. Hum. Gene Ther 4, 419–431. Marthas, M.L., Lu, D., Penedo, M.C., Hendrickx, A.G., Miller, C.J., 2001. Titration of an SIVmac251 stock by vaginal inoculation of Indian and Chinese origin rhesus macaques: transmission efficiency, viral loads, and antibody responses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 17, 1455–1466. McChesney, M.B., Collins, J.R., Lu, D., Lü, X., Torten, J., Ashley, R.L., Cloyd, M.W., Miller, C.J., 1998. Occult systemic infection and persistent SIVspecific CD4+ T cell proliferative responses in rhesus macaques that were transiently viremic after intravaginal inoculation of SIV. J. Virol 72, 10029–10035. O'Connor, D.H., Mothe, B.R., Weinfurter, J.T., Fuenger, S., Rehrauer, W.M., Jing, P., Rudersdorf, R.R., Liebl, M.E., Krebs, K., Vasquez, J., Dodds, E., Loffredo, J., Martin, S., McDermott, A.B., Allen, T.M., Wang, C., Doxiadis,
G.G., Montefiori, D.C., Hughes, A., Burton, D.R., Allison, D.B., Wolinsky, S.M., Bontrop, R., Picker, L.J., Watkins, D.I., 2003. Major histocompatibility complex class I alleles associated with slow simian immunodeficiency virus disease progression bind epitopes recognized by dominant acute-phase cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte responses. J. Virol 77, 9029–9040. Ruprecht, R.M., Baba, T.W., Rasmussen, R., Hu, Y., Sharma, P.L., 1996. Murine and simian retrovirus models: the threshold hypothesis. Aids 10, S33–S40. Rutebemberwa, A., Bess, J.W.J., Brown, B., Arroyo, M., Eller, M., Slike, B., Polonis, V., McCutchan, F., Currier, J.R., Birx, D., Robb, M., Marovich, M., Lifson, J.D., Cox, J.H., 2007. Evaluation of aldrithiol-2-inactivated preparations of HIV type 1 subtypes A, B, and D as reagents to monitor T cell responses. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 23, 532–542. Shacklett, B.L., Shaw, K.E., Adamson, L.A., Wilkens, D.T., Cox, C.A., Montefiori, D.C., Gardner, M.B., Sonigo, P., Luciw, P.A., 2002. Live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac-M4, with point mutations in the Env transmembrane protein intracytoplasmic domain, provides partial protection from mucosal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251. J. Virol 76, 11365–11378. Singh, D.K., Liu, Z., Sheffer, D., Mackay, G.A., Smith, M., Dhillon, S., Hegde, R., Jia, F., Adany, I., Narayan, O., 2005. A noninfectious simian/human immunodeficiency virus DNA vaccine that protects macaques against AIDS. J. Virol 79, 3419–3428. Spörri, R., Reis e Sousa, C., 2007. Inflammatory mediators are insufficient for full dendritic cell activation and promote expansion of CD4+ T cell populations lacking helper function. Nat. Immunol 6, 163–170. Wang, S., Kozlowski, P.A., Achmelz, G., Manson, K., Wyand, M.S., Glickman, R., Montefiori, D., Lifson, J.D., Johnson, R.P., Neutra, M.R., Aldovini, A., 2000. Effective induction of simian immunodeficiency virus-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses in primates by vaccination with proviral DNA producing intact but noninfectious virions. J. Virol 74, 10514–10522. Wojcechowskyj, J.A., Yant, L.J., Wiseman, R.W., O'Connor, D.H., O'Connor, S.L., 2007. Control of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 is not predicted by inheritane of Mamu-B⁎17-containing haplotypes. J. Virol 81, 406–410. Yant, L.J., Friedrich, T.C., Johnson, R.C., May, G.E., Maness, N.J., Enz, A.M., Lifson, J.D., O'Connor, D.H., Carrington, M., Watkins, D.I., 2006. The high-frequency major histocompatibility complex class I allele Mamu-B⁎17 is associated with control of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 replication. J. Virol 80, 5074–5077. Zou, J.X., Luciw, P.A., 1996. The requirement for vif of SIVmac is cell-type dependent. J. Gen. Virol 77, 427–434.