Accepted Manuscript Validation of a thermal threshold nociceptive model in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps) Émilie L. Couture, Beatriz P. Monteiro, Jessica Aymen, Eric Troncy, Paulo V. Steagall PII:
S1467-2987(17)30054-5
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaa.2016.07.005
Reference:
VAA 80
To appear in:
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Received Date: 13 April 2016 Revised Date:
13 July 2016
Accepted Date: 16 July 2016
Please cite this article as: Couture ÉL, Monteiro BP, Aymen J, Troncy E, Steagall PV, Validation of a thermal threshold nociceptive model in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps), Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.07.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
RESEARCH PAPER
2
ÉL Couture et al.
3
Thermal threshold in bearded dragons
4
Validation of a thermal threshold nociceptive model in bearded dragons (Pogona
5
vitticeps)
6
Émilie L Couture*, Beatriz P Monteiro†, Jessica Aymen*, Eric Troncy† & Paulo V
7
Steagall*
8
*Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Saint-Hyacinthe,
9
Canada
M AN U
SC
RI PT
1
10
†Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Saint-Hyacinthe,
11
Canada
12
Correspondence: Paulo Steagall, Département de Sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine
14
vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, J2S 2M2, Canada.
15 16
EP
TE D
13
Abstract
18
Objectives To validate a thermal threshold (TT) nociceptive model in bearded dragons
19
(Pogona vitticeps) and to document TT changes after administration of morphine.
20
Study design Two part randomized, blinded, controlled, experimental study.
21
Animals Five adult bearded dragons (242–396 g).
22
Methods A TT device delivered a ramped nociceptive stimulus (0.6°C second-1) to the
23
medial thigh until a response (leg kick/escape behavior) was observed, or maximum (cut-
AC C
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
off) temperature of 62°C was reached. In Phase I Period 1, six TT readings were
25
determined at 20 minute intervals for evaluation of repeatability. Two of these readings
26
were randomly assigned to be sham to assess specificity of the behavioral response. The
27
same experiment was repeated 2 weeks later (Period 2) to test reproducibility. In Phase II,
28
animals were administered either intramuscular morphine (10 mg kg-1) or saline 0.9%.
29
Thermal thresholds (maximum 68°C) were determined before and 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours
30
after treatment administration. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (temporal
31
changes and repeatability) and paired t-tests (reproducibility and treatment comparisons)
32
using Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05).
33
Results Mean TT was 57.4 ± 3.8°C and 57.3 ± 4.3°C for Periods 1 and 2, respectively.
34
Data were repeatable within each period (p = 0.83 and p = 0.07, respectively).
35
Reproducibility between periods was remarkable (p = 0.86). False-positive responses
36
during sham-testing were 10%. TTs were significantly increased after morphine
37
administration at 2, 4 and 8 hours when compared with baseline, and at 2 and 4 hours when
38
compared with saline 0.9%. Highest TT was 67.7 ± 0.7°C at 4 hours after morphine
39
administration.
40
Conclusions and clinical relevance Testing was repeatable, reproducible, and well
41
tolerated in bearded dragons. TT nociceptive testing detected morphine administration and
42
may be suitable for studying opioid regimens in bearded dragons.
44
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
43
RI PT
24
Keywords analgesia, morphine, nociception, opioid, pain, reptile
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Introduction
46
The class Reptilia includes more than 7200 species that display a wide range of
47
physiological and behavioral adaptations to their environment. These species are housed at
48
zoological parks, rehabilitation centers and veterinary clinics and may require veterinary
49
care. In that sense, pain-induced behaviors can be subtle and difficult to interpret in reptiles
50
which can render the assessment and treatment of pain suboptimal (Fleming & Robertson
51
2012; Sladky & Mans 2012). There are a few published studies describing the
52
pharmacokinetics (PK) of analgesic drugs in reptiles (Kummrow et al. 2008; Norton et al.
53
2015) and their analgesic effects (Sladky & Mans 2012). Nociceptive threshold testing
54
allows objective quantification of the antinociceptive effects of an opioid (Love et al.
55
2011). Studies on antinociception may provide species-specific and evidence-based
56
recommendations for the treatment of clinical pain in reptiles.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
45
The aims of this study were to validate a thermal threshold (TT) nociceptive device
58
in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps) and use this device to assess the effect of morphine
59
administration. The hypotheses were that 1) a repeatable, reproducible behavioral response
60
without tissue injury would result from a ramped nociceptive thermal stimulus in
61
unrestrained bearded dragons and 2) administration of morphine would result in thermal
62
antinociception.
64
EP
AC C
63
TE D
57
65
Materials and methods
66
This study was approved by the animal care committee of the Faculty of Veterinary
67
Medicine, Université de Montréal (14-Rech-1736).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
68 Animals
70
Five adult bearded dragons, three males and two females weighing 242-396 g, were
71
included in this study. They were obtained from different commercial suppliers and the
72
ages were unknown. The animals were considered to be healthy based on physical
73
examination and results of fecal zinc sulfate flotation, complete blood count and serum
74
chemistry profile (Gibbons et al. 2012). They were all administered antiprotozoal treatment
75
(Marquis 15% w/w ponazuril; Bayer Inc., Canada) upon arrival. Bearded dragons were
76
housed individually in a terrarium with 0.80 x 0.46 x 0.51 m dimensions (Atazuki,
77
Mingchang Industrial & Trading Co., LTD, China). A 14-hour daylight period was
78
provided with an Ultraviolet-B (UVB) light (Reptisun T8 10.0 UVB 61 cm; Zoo Med
79
Laboratories Inc., CA, USA). During daytime, animals had access to a basking spot of
80
approximately 40°C (150 W Repticare Ceramic Infrared Heat Emitter; Zoo Med
81
Laboratories Inc.) and room temperature was kept at 27°C. A sloped wood branch and a
82
cardboard box were provided. Three sides of the terrarium were covered with opaque paper
83
so that animals did not have visual contact with each other or the observers. The animals
84
were fed with greens, vegetables, fruits, crickets and worms with appropriate supplements;
85
fresh water was available ad libitum. Animals were allowed to rest for one week before an
86
acclimation period of 10 days when they were conditioned to manipulations and the testing
87
device. Animals were adopted at the end of the study.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
69
88 89
Thermal threshold
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
A commercial TT device (Topcat Metrology Ltd., UK) with a 15 x 5 x 10 mm probe
91
containing a heater element and a temperature sensor was used in this study (Fig. 1). The
92
device was calibrated before the study according to the manufacturer. The probe was
93
attached to the medial surface of the thigh of the bearded dragon using bandage material
94
(Fig. 2) and connected by a ribbon cable to a control unit with a digital display of
95
temperature. The ribbon cable exited the terrarium at the top and was long enough to allow
96
free movement of the bearded dragon. This digital display was visualized by one observer
97
(BM, PS or JA) who was behind the terrarium and responsible for connecting and
98
disconnecting the cable, recording temperature values and treatment administration. A
99
video camera (D5100; Nikon Canada Inc, Canada) was directed towards the uncovered side
100
of the terrarium and connected to a computer (Macbook Pro; Apple Canada Inc., Canada)
101
located outside the room. An evaluator (EC) who was blinded to the treatment stayed
102
outside the room to perform TT testing using the wireless temperature remote control. The
103
evaluator could perform live-observation of the animals during testing using an appropriate
104
software (Camera Control Pro 2; Nikon Canada Inc, Canada). The animals were unable to
105
see the observers and evaluator.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
90
Ten minutes elapsed after probe placement and before thermal stimulation. Skin
107
temperature (ST) was recorded before each test. A wireless remote control increased the
108
temperature of the probe in a ramped thermal stimulus of 0.6°C second-1 until a behavioral
109
response was observed or the cut-off temperature (68°C) was reached. The recorded
110
temperature was considered to be the TT of the animal. In each testing period, thermal
111
stimulation was alternated between pelvic limbs, and bearded dragons were examined for
112
tissue damage daily for up to 72 hours.
AC C
106
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
113 Study design
115
Preliminary study
116
Three sites for probe placement were tested in two bearded dragons: on the thorax, at the
117
base of the tail and at the proximal medial thigh. The band around the thorax securing the
118
probe was not well tolerated. The animals’ behavioral responses were observed when
119
thermal stimuli were applied to the tail or thigh and no response resulted from stimulation
120
of the tail. Stimulation of the thigh resulted in attempts to escape, paddling of the pelvic
121
limbs, kicking of the ipsilateral limb or waking up. Stimulation trials on the pelvic limbs
122
were then performed on the three remaining bearded dragons to confirm behavioral
123
responses.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
114
An initial cut-off temperature of 55°C was chosen based on previous research with
125
green iguanas (Fleming & Robertson 2012). However, three bearded dragons did not
126
respond at this temperature and the cut-off was increased to 62°C after ethical approval.
TE D
124
127 Phase I
129
Phase I was conducted on all five bearded dragons and consisted of TT testing (Period 1)
130
that was repeated 2 weeks later (Period 2). Phase I was completed before Phase II. Six TT
131
tests were performed at 20 minute intervals. Two of these tests were randomly assigned
132
using online software (www.randomization.org) to be sham, where the probe was
133
disconnected from the control unit by one of the observers while the evaluator was not
134
aware of it.
135
AC C
EP
128
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Phase II
137
In Phase I, the mean TT was close to the cut-off temperature of 62°C which would not
138
allow significant increases in thermal nociception after the administration of an opioid.
139
Thus, the cut-off temperature was increased to 68°C for Phase II after ethical approval.
140
Animals were randomly assigned to be administered either morphine (10 mg kg-1;
141
Morphine 10 mg mL-1; Sandoz Canada Inc., Canada) intramuscularly (IM) into a thoracic
142
limb or an equivalent volume of saline 0.9%. After 14 days, the treatments were reversed.
143
Thermal thresholds were determined before (baseline) and at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after
144
treatment administration. Two baseline thresholds were determined 15 minutes apart and
145
averaged.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
136
146 Statistical analysis
148
Data showed normal distribution and passed equal tests of variance using the Shapiro-Wilk
149
test. For Phase I, ST and TT temporal changes within Period 1 or Period 2 (repeatability)
150
were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for repeated measures, excluding sham values.
151
Reproducibility was tested when comparing ST and TT between the Periods 1 and 2 in
152
Phase I, and using a paired t-test. The latter test was also used for treatment comparison in
153
Phase II followed by Bonferroni correction (GraphPad Prism Version 5; GraphPad
154
Software, Inc., CA, USA). Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) with p <
155
0.05. Specificity is reported as a percentage representing the ratio of false-positive
156
responses and total number of sham stimulations.
AC C
EP
TE D
147
157 158
Results
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Phase I
160
One bearded dragon did not respond to thermal stimulation at 62°C; only the sham results
161
were considered for this part of the study. Skin temperature was significantly different
162
between Periods 1 (33.8 ± 1°C) and 2 (35.4 ± 1°C) (p = 0.001). Temporal changes for ST
163
were not significant in Period 1 (p = 0.08) and 2 (p = 0.57) (Fig. 3).
RI PT
159
Repeatability of TT was recorded over Period 1 (p = 0.83) and 2 (p = 0.07) (Fig. 3).
165
Reproducibility of TT between Period 1 (57.4 ± 3.8°C) and 2 (57.3 ± 4.3°C) was
166
remarkable (p = 0.86). There were two and zero false-positive responses during sham
167
testing in Period 1 and 2, respectively (10% in total). In one of them, the observer
168
recognized immediately that the remote control was activated accidentally and the observed
169
behavior was not a typical TT response.
M AN U
SC
164
170 Phase II
172
Skin temperature was significantly increased at 2, 4 and 8 hours after the administration of
173
morphine when compared with baseline value and at 4 and 8 hours when compared with
174
saline 0.9% (Fig. 4). It was observed that the bearded dragons consistently adopted a
175
resting posture with the head flat on the surface beneath them (floor or wood branch) at 4-
176
12 hours after morphine administration. The skin of some of these individuals was slightly
177
darker than usual.
EP
AC C
178
TE D
171
Thermal thresholds were significantly increased at 2, 4 and 8 hours after morphine
179
administration when compared with baseline values (Bonferroni correction p < 0.05).
180
Thermal thresholds were significantly increased at 2 and 4 hours in the morphine treatment
181
when compared with saline 0.9% treatment. Mean maximum TT after the administration of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
morphine was 67.7 ± 0.7°C at 4 hours (Fig. 5). Mean maximum TT after saline
183
administration was 60.4 ± 3.1°C at 8 hours. Significant differences in TT when compared
184
with baseline assessments were not observed after saline 0.9% administration. Tissue
185
damage was not observed in any bearded dragon during the entire study.
RI PT
182
186 Discussion
188
Thermal nociceptive threshold testing was repeatable, reproducible and well tolerated
189
without causing tissue damage in unrestrained bearded dragons. The antinociceptive effects
190
of morphine were observed. Research using the thermal threshold device may be useful for
191
the evaluation of different opioid regimens (doses, routes of administration, drugs) and to
192
provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of clinical pain in bearded
193
dragons. The antinociceptive effects of a drug in the laboratory setting are commonly
194
extrapolated to the clinical setting where analgesic protocols become species-specific.
195
Nevertheless, it may be argued that clinical pain is much more complex and laboratorial
196
methods should involve a comprehensive evaluation of nociception using more than one
197
type of stimulus (Steagall et al. 2007), which could be a limitation of this study.
198
Furthermore, the relationship between antinociception and clinical analgesia is unknown in
199
reptiles and clinical studies are required to validate if our results can be extrapolated to
200
bearded dragons with naturally-occurring painful conditions.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
201
SC
187
Nociceptive models involve the assessment and quantification of sensory
202
sensitivity for the study of pain in a controlled manner. Thermal, mechanical or electrical
203
nociceptive stimuli are applied until a behavioral response is observed (i.e. threshold) (Le
204
Bars et al. 2001). The use of thermal nociception withdrawal latency (TWL) was originally
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
reported in crocodiles (Kanui et al. 1990; Kanui & Hole 1992) and more recently in
206
bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps), corn snakes (Pantherophis guttulatus) (Sladky et al.
207
2008) and yellow bellied and red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta scripta and
208
Trachemys scripta elegans) (Sladky et al. 2007, 2009; Baker et al. 2011; Giorgi et al. 2014,
209
2015a, b). The use of TT nociception has been reported in green iguanas (Fleming &
210
Robertson 2012), and validated for use in cats, horses, chickens and rabbits (Dixon et al.
211
2002; Hothersall et al. 2011; Love et al. 2011; Barter & Kwiatkowski 2013). Animals are
212
unrestrained in their normal habitat and can display normal behavior; an acclimation period
213
is required as it was performed in the present study (Dixon et al. 2002). However, the use of
214
a TT probe implies a tactile stimulus compared with the selective stimulus provided by
215
radiant heat in TWL (Le Bars 2001). No publication investigating the repeatability nor the
216
reproducibility of TWL or TT in reptiles were found. Phase I of this study aimed to address
217
this issue. Repeatability relates to the degree of agreement between findings in successive
218
evaluations. Reproducibility relates to the degree of agreement between findings in a
219
different period of time or by different evaluators. Reproducibility between different
220
observers was not assessed; however mean TT values were compared between periods 1
221
and 2 as previously reported in cats (Dixon et al. 2002). The small size of bearded dragons
222
prevented the application of an inflatable cuff that maintains a consistent contact between
223
probe and skin (Dixon et al. 2002) and may have reduced repeatability and reproducibility
224
in Phase I.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
205
225
Sham testing was used to assess specificity of the behavioural response to thermal
226
stimulation and similarly to what has been reported in rabbits and cats while studying if the
227
model is subject of observer bias (Dixon et al. 2002; Barter & Kwiatkowski 2013). Sham
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
testing revealed some false-positive reactions during testing. Kicking or other escape
229
behavior was not recorded during the preliminary study or when the TT probe was
230
attached, but not activated, to the thigh of the animal using bandage material. Therefore,
231
false-positive responses were unlikely to be associated with poor conditioning or simply
232
bandage application. In the authors’ experience, false-positive responses to nociceptive
233
stimulation can occur with spontaneous movement in cats, dogs and horses. Acclimation,
234
appropriate experimental conditions, adequate observer experience/training and larger
235
sample sizes may reduce individual variability to thermal stimulation and false positive
236
responses using this model in bearded dragons.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
228
Thermal threshold and cut-off temperatures were higher in bearded dragons when
238
compared with other species. Mean TT was 57.4°C, 40.0°C and 43.3°C in bearded dragons,
239
cats and broiler chickens, respectively (Dixon et al. 2002; Hothersall et al. 2011). In our
240
study, a cut-off temperature of 55°C such as used in green iguanas (Fleming & Robertson
241
2012) did not evoke a consistent response to thermal stimulation. A final cut-off of 68°C
242
did not cause tissue damage. The onset, magnitude and duration of action of morphine on
243
thermal antinociception could be recorded. Differences in reptile skin structure and function
244
may be habitat-related and could explain variations in cut-off temperatures and
245
susceptibility to skin damage using thermal nociceptive devices (Klein & Gorb 2012). For
246
example, species that are found in tropical arid and semi-arid environments including
247
bearded dragons might have habitat-related skin adaptations that could result in high TT
248
(Sladky et al. 2008). In addition, following the completion of the study, skin biopsies of one
249
bearded dragon that did not respond to thermal stimulation with a cut-off of 62°C revealed
250
a superficial fungal infection. It has been hypothesized that shedding may influence TT
AC C
EP
TE D
237
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
responses in bearded dragons (Sladky et al. 2008). Therefore, species-specific cut-off
252
temperatures and experimental devices should be determined and any underlying skin
253
condition should be investigated prior to the start of a study.
RI PT
251
The dose of morphine (10 mg kg-1) was chosen based on a previous study using the
255
TWL that resulted in thermal antinociception (Sladky et al. 2008). Sedation was not
256
evaluated in the present study and it is not clear how it would have affected nociceptive
257
testing and morphine-induced antinociception. However, previous studies showed that
258
sedation scores did not influence TT after the administration of dexmedetomidine in cats
259
(Slingsby & Taylor 2008). Further studies are warranted to address the effects of sedation
260
on nociceptive testing in bearded dragons.
M AN U
SC
254
Differences in ST were observed in both phases of the study, however ST
262
differences did not seem to alter TT. The ectothermic nature of bearded dragons may
263
explain these differences since animals were unrestrained which allowed behavioral
264
thermoregulation during testing. In Phase II, significant increases in ST were recorded as
265
well as color changes after the administration of morphine. Morphine-induced dose-
266
dependent hyperthermia has been reported in lizards (Kavaliers et al. 1984) but the
267
mechanism by which hyperthermia is induced is not clear. Indeed, changes in skin color are
268
considered to be means of thermoregulation in many reptiles and darker coloration is
269
associated with heat gain and increases in body temperature (de Velasco & Tattersall 2008).
270
The small number of animals is a limitation of this study, especially considering the
AC C
EP
TE D
261
271
large individual variability in TT. This number was originally based on similar TT studies
272
in cats and green iguanas (Fleming & Robertson 2012; Steagall et al. 2015). It was deemed
273
to be acceptable since significant differences in Phase II and remarkable repeatability and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
reproducibility of Phase I were detected. Finally, although experimental nociceptive testing
275
provides an objective assessment of drug effects, more than one type of stimulus should be
276
used in an attempt to address the complexity of clinical pain (Steagall et al. 2007).
277
Furthermore, the relationship between antinociception and clinical analgesia is unknown in
278
reptiles. Clinical studies in bearded dragons with naturally occurring painful conditions are
279
required to support our results.
280
In conclusion, TT testing was repeatable, reproducible, and well tolerated in unrestrained
281
bearded dragons. Sham testing resulted in rare false-positive responses. Thermal
282
antinociception was detected following morphine administration using the TT device.
283
Study of opioid regimens using TT may be useful for providing evidence-based
284
recommendations for the treatment of clinical pain in bearded dragons. However, the
285
clinical relevance in this species requires further investigation.
286
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
274
Acknowledgements
288
Funding was provided by the Bourse de Recherche du Zoo de Granby en Santé de la Faune
289
and by the Fonds de Recherche Zoetis of the Université de Montréal. Dr Cedric B Larouche
290
and Dr Graham Zoller for technical assistance. Topcat Metrology for technical advice. Dr.
291
Beatriz Monteiro is a recipient of the Vanier Canada graduate scholarship.
AC C
292
EP
287
293
Authors’ contributions
294
Generation of hypothesis and study design, funding and grant writing: ÉLC, ÉT, PVS.
295
Experimental study: ÉLC, BPM, JA, PVS. Statistical analysis: ÉLC, PVS. Manuscript
296
writing: all authors.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
297
References
298
Baker BB, Sladky KK, Johnson SM (2011) Evaluation of the analgesic effects of oral and subcutaneous tramadol administration in red-eared slider turtles. J Am Vet Med Assoc
300
238, 220–227.
303 304 305
New Zealand white rabbits. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 52, 44–47.
SC
302
Barter LS, Kwiatkowski A (2013) Thermal threshold testing for evaluation of analgesics in
Dixon MJ, Robertson SA, Taylor PM (2002) A thermal threshold testing device for evaluation of analgesics in cats. Res Vet Sci 72, 205–210.
M AN U
301
RI PT
299
Fleming GJ, Robertson SA (2012) Assessments of thermal antinociceptive effects of
306
butorphanol and human observer effect on quantitative evaluation of analgesia in green
307
iguanas (Iguana iguana). Am J Vet Res 73, 1507–1511.
Gibbons PM, Klaphake E, Carpenter JW (2012) Reptiles. In: Exotic Animal Formulary (4th
309
edn). Carpenter JW, Marion CJ (eds). Elsevier Health Sciences, USA. pp. 83–182.
310
Giorgi M, de Vito V, Owen H et al. (2014) PK/PD evaluations of the novel atypical opioid
313 314 315 316 317
EP
312
tapentadol in red-eared slider turtles. Med Weter 70, 530–535. Giorgi M, Lee H-K, Rota S et al. (2015a) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments of tapentadol in yellow-bellied slider turtles (Trachemys scripta scripta)
AC C
311
TE D
308
after a single intramuscular injection. J Exotic Pet Med 24, 317–325.
Giorgi M, Salvadori M, De Vito V et al. (2015b) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessments of 10 mg/kg tramadol intramuscular injection in yellow-bellied slider
turtles (Trachemys scripta scripta). J Vet Pharmacol Ther 38, 488–496.
318
Hothersall B, Caplen G, Nicol CJ et al. (2011) Development of mechanical and thermal
319
nociceptive threshold testing devices in unrestrained birds (broiler chickens). J
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
323 324 325 326 327 328 329
Pharmacol Ther 15, 101–103.
RI PT
322
Kanui TI, Hole K (1992) Morphine and pethidine antinociception in the crocodile. J Vet
Kanui TI, Hole K, Miaron JO (1990) Nociception in crocodiles: capsaicin instillation, formalin and hot plate tests. Zoolog Sci 7, 537–540.
Kavaliers M, Courtenay S, Hirst M (1984) Opiates influence behavioral thermoregulation
SC
321
Neurosci Methods 201, 220–227.
in the curly-tailed lizard, Leiocephalus carinatus. Physiol Behav 32, 221–224. Klein M-CG, Gorb SN (2012) Epidermis architecture and material properties of the skin of
M AN U
320
four snake species. J R Soc Interface 9, 3140–3155.
Kummrow MS, Tseng F, Hesse L, Court M (2008) Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine
330
after single-dose subcutaneous administration in red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta
331
elegans). J Zoo Wildl Med 39, 590–595.
335 336 337 338
TE D
334
53, 597–652.
Love EJ, Murrell J, Whay HR (2011) Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing
EP
333
Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW (2001) Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev
in horses: a review. Vet Anaesth Analg 38, 3–14. Norton TM, Cox S, Nelson SE Jr et al. (2015) Pharmacokinetics of tramadol and O-
AC C
332
desmethyltramadol in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). J Zoo Wildl Med 46,
262–265.
339
Sladky KK, Mans C (2012) Clinical analgesia in reptiles. J Exotic Pet Med 21, 158–167.
340
Sladky KK, Miletic V, Paul-Murphy J et al. (2007) Analgesic efficacy and respiratory
341 342
effects of butorphanol and morphine in turtles. J Am Vet Med Assoc 230, 1356–1362. Sladky KK, Kinney ME, Johnson SM (2008) Analgesic efficacy of butorphanol and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
343 344
morphine in bearded dragons and corn snakes. J Am Vet Med Assoc 233, 267–273. Sladky KK, Kinney ME, Johnson SM (2009). Effects of opioid receptor activation on thermal antinociception in red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta).
346
Am J Vet Res 70, 1072–1078.
347
RI PT
345
Slingsby LS, Taylor PM (2008) Thermal antinociception after dexmedetomidine
administration in cats: a dose-finding study. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 31, 135–142.
349
Steagall PV, Monteiro BP, Lavoie AM, Troncy E (2015) Preliminary investigation of the
350
thermal antinociceptive effects of codeine in cats. J Feline Med Surg 17, 1061-1064.
M AN U
351
SC
348
Steagall PV, Taylor PM, Brondani JT et al. (2007) Effects of buprenorphine, carprofen and
352
saline on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 34,
353
344–350.
354
de Velasco JB, Tattersall GJ (2008) The influence of hypoxia on the thermal sensitivity of skin colouration in the bearded dragon, Pogona vitticeps. J Comp Physiol B 178, 867–
356
875.
EP
358
AC C
357
TE D
355
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure legends
360
Figure 1. Thermal threshold (TT) device with a digital display (A) connected by a cable to
361
the probe (B). Arrow indicates the heater element.
362
RI PT
359
Figure 2. Probe (arrow) of the thermal threshold device placed on the medial surface of the
364
thigh of a bearded dragon and secured using bandage material.
SC
363
365
Figure 3. Skin temperature (ST) and thermal threshold (TT) (means ± standard deviations)
367
in five bearded dragons of four thermal nociceptive stimulations (performed twice, 2 weeks
368
apart; Phase I, Periods 1 and 2).]
369
M AN U
366
Figure 4. Skin temperature (ST) (mean ± standard deviation) in five bearded dragons
371
before (baseline) and after intramuscular administration of morphine (10 mg kg-1) or an
372
equivalent volume of saline. *Significantly different from baseline (p < 0.05).
373
†Significantly different from saline at the same time point (p < 0.05).
EP
374
TE D
370
Figure 5 Thermal threshold (TT) (mean ± standard deviation) in five bearded dragons
376
before (baseline) and after intramuscular administration of morphine (10 mg kg-1) or an
377
equivalent volume of saline. *Significantly different from baseline (p < 0.05).
378
†Significantly different from saline at the same time point (p < 0.05).
379
AC C
375
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT