Vol.
96, No.
September
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980 30,
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 831-837
1980
VEAL
HEART
Eiko
Akaboshi,
Department
Received
of
RIBONUCLEASE
P HAS
Cecilia
Biology,
AN ESSENTIAL
Guerrier-Takada
Yale
RNA
and
University,
New
COMPONENT
Sidney
Haven,
Altman
Ct.,
06520
USA
7,198O
August
Summary: The activity of RNase P (EC 3.1.26.5) from veal heart can be abolished by pretreatment of the enzyme preparation with micrococcal nuclease, pancreatic RNase A, or RNase Tl. This indicates that veal heart RNase P contains an RNA component essential for function of the enzyme as has also been shown for E. coli RNase P (l-3). 3Additionally, veal heart RNase P has buoyant density in Cs2S04 of 1.33 g/cm , which is intermediate between that protein and nucleic acid. RNase is
(4-61,
This
P,
necessary
enzyme
has
been
detected
for
the
biosynthesis
recognizes
substrates,
tRNA
sequences evidence
which
near have
(l-3).
In
also
requires
some
precursor its
an
molecules, cleavage.
that
E.
coli
RNA
we
show
component
(4).
RNase that for
an
the
structural rather
of
paper
procaryotic of
of
sites
shown
this
aspect
in
and 5’
eucaryotic
termini
of
than Both
P consists eucaryotic
of
specific
RNA
enzyme,
molecules. its
nucleotide
functional of
organisms
tRNA
conformation
a of
and
physical
and
protein
veal
heart
moieties RNase
P,
function. METHODS
Preuaration of RNase P: 426 g of fresh veal hearts, defatted and sliced, were homogenized in 300 ml of ice cold buffer TM (20 mM Tris.ACl, pll 7.6+/15 mM Mg(GAc)2 / 6 mM I-mercaptoethanol) containing 20 mM NH4C1 and 20gM PMSF . The buffer was then made 0.7% in Triton X-100 and 0.3% in sodium deoxycholate. The homogenate was left for 30 min on ice and then centrifuged at 16,300 x g The resulting supernatant (S16) was diluted two-fold with for 30 min at 4O. buffer TM containing 20 mM NH Cl and loaded onto a DEAE Sephadex A-50 column (2) (bed volume 1.5 1) equill -% rated with the same buffer. The loaded material was eluted stepwise with successive two liter washes of buffer TM containing 0.06 M NH4Cl, 0.2 M NH4Cl and 0.35 M NH4Cl. The RIfase P activity was elated in the last wash step. The pooled, active fractions were passed through a Biobeads (Biorad Corp.) column (18 ml bed volume) to remove the Triton X-100. The resulting active fractions were concentrated using (NH4)2S04. The lo-25% (0.1 g to 0.25 g/ ml original volume) (NH4)2S04 pellet was resuspended in buffer TM containing 0.2 N NH Cl and applied to a Sephadex G-100 column (1.3 1 bed volume). The RNase P act 4 vity elated just after the void volume Assav of RNase P activity: Radioactive substrate (E. coli tRNA br precursor) was reaction mixture 2-mercaptoethanol, substrate.
prepared and assayed (30 pl) contained 0.1 IIIN Na2EDTA,
as previously described 5 mM MgC12, 100 s&l NH4Cl, 50 mM Tris.HCl. pH 8 and
(5). The 1mM 5.000-7,000
standard cpm
of
0006-291X/80/180831-07$01.00/0 831
All
Copyright 0 1980 rights of reproduction
by Academic Press, Inc. in any form reserved.
Vol.
96,
No.
2, 1980
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Ribonuolease inactivation of RNase P: Micrococcal nuolease: 10 81 of RNase P purified through the Sephadex G-100 step (about 20 pg of protein) was mixed with 1 pl of 50 mM Ca (OAC)~, 3 ~1 of 50 gbf PMSF and 1 ~1 of MNe (0.17 units or 1.7 units per 15 pl pretreatment mixture as desired) a kind gift of The mixture was incubated at 37O for Dr. M. Laskowski, Sr., in 1 j!M NaCl. 40 min. 10 gl of 10 mM RGTA was added to inactivate the MN by chelating Ca2+ . The RNase P activity was then assayed in standard reaction mixtures containing 1 mM PITA and 10 nbl PMSF. RNase Tl and RNase Pretreatment with these enzymes (separately) was A: carried out in buffer TM containing 0.2 M N’R Cl and 10 uM PMSF. 1.5 units of RNase T1 or 1 pl of RNase A (1 mg/ml) was ad % ed to 55 pl of RNase P (as The sample was incubated for 40 min at 37O. In some cases the above). amount of RNase A and RNase P were doubled to provide larger sample volumes. After incubation (NR,) SO4 (0.49 mg/ml) was added in the ratio of 90 pl of After centrifugation the pellet was (NR4)2S04 solution to 1 10 1.11 of sample. redissolved in buffer TM containing 0.2 M NR4Cl. This procedure effectively removes most of the RNase T1 and RNase A from mixtures containing these enzymes and RNase P. The resuspended pellet fraction was used directly for assay of RNase P or further purified by applying to a sucrose gradient. Gradients were formed by layering steps of buffer TM with 0.2 M NR4Cl Each step was 150 ~1. containing 20%. 15%. lok or 7.5% sucrose. Centrifugation was carried out in tubes of 0.65 ml capacity in the Beckman SW65 rotor with special bucket adaptors for 4 hr at 59,000 rpm, or for 14 hr This gradient purification procedure was used because at 31,000 rpm at 4O. the molecular weight of RNase P is much larger than that of either RNase T1 or BNase A. The tubes were punctured with a 27 gauge hypodermic needle and one drop fractions were collected. &2@+ densitv aradient centrifuaation: Preformed step density gradients were by layering 0.19 ml each of 45W, 37% and 31% Cs2S04 solutions made in TM buffer containing 0.2 M NR4Cl. The sample, 0.05 ml, was then layered on the gradient made in cellulose nitrate tubes of 0.65 ml capacity and the tube were centrifuged in the Beckman SW 65 rotor equipped with tube adaptors. Centrifngation was carried out for at least 6 hr at 3O and 59,000 rpm. Longer run times did not alter the results. Two drop fractions were collected after puncturing the bottom of the tubes with a 27 gauge hypodermic needle. Aliquots of each fraction were then assayed for RNase P activity in standard fashion.
MN uretreatment: Methods, 1.2
and
When
little 7.8)
or as
autoradiograph
absence intactness *Abbreviations:
can of
contrast,
control of
residual
be the
P is
seen
show the
by
MN -
the
RNase
with
P activity lack
polyacrylamide
precursor PMSF RGTA
pretreated
RNase
incubations,
Ca2+, of
no
RNase
of
gel carried
P is substrate
still
MN as is
RNase analysis
out
in
active as
seen
- phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride - ethylene glycol-bis-(8-aminoethyl N - N’tetraacetic acid micrococcal nuclease
832
observed
the
the
absence
(Fig.
lA, Fig.
the
lA,
products reaction of
shows
ether)
lanes in
the
mixture.
RN or
lanes lA,
in
(Fig.
P cleavage of
in
described
3-6). that
in
By the
The the
MN
is
Vol.
96, No.
EIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980
AND
EIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Origin-
pt RNAtRNA(,” 5:
A. Figure 1: Inactivation of a veal heart RRaso P by pretreatment rith micrococcal nucloaso or RRaso T 1. A. Lanes 1 and 2: Pretreatment rith 0.17 units of RN, 0.5 nl or 1 pl in assay mixture respectively. Lanes 3 and 4: Pretreatment with RN as in lanes 1 and 2 but no Ca2+ present. 0.5 pl and 1 ul assayed respectively. Lanes 5 and 6: Mock pretreatment, Ca2+ present but RR absent, 0.5 pl and 1 ul assayed respectively. Lanes 7 and 8: as in lanes 1 and 2 but 1.7 units of RN used. B. MN pretreatment followed by (N84)2S04 fractionation as described in the methods. Experimental conditions as in Fig. 1A. lanes 2.4.6.8 respectively. C. Pretreatment with RRaso T1 follovod by (Ml )2SO4 fractionation as described in the Rethods. Lane 1, Control (no Ware T1); 1 al assayed. pro 4 roatmont Lane 2: Pretreated rith INare T1; 1 The position of the precursor of tRRA substrate and the RRaso P pl assayed. cleavage fragments containing the mature tRRA sequence with the ‘extra’ 5’ are indicated in the figure. proximal fragment,
completely
inactivated
activity the
must active
veal
as
the
true
of
the
mature
left the
at
due
products
the
tRNATyr origin
in
fractionation
preparation
is
RNase P have
expected
by
of
the
gel
of
our
results
Methods.
used
at
the in
origin these
P.
The
by
of
lanes
Since
to
lB,
experiments
RNaso RNase
in
which
the
same
5’
as
that
terminus
radioactivity
was
complicating the
P with
(hlR4)2S04,
P after little The
eleotrophoresis. was
833
l-4,
analysis
further
pretreated
lanes gel
some
the
possibly
the
by
fingerprint
fractionate of
the
generated
at
1,2,7,8),
decided
ribonuclease
products by
shown).
of
the
residual
P cleavage
precipitation
Pig.
any
cleavage
RNase
lA, we
and
characterized
not
(Fig.
in
Ca2+
accurate
Reassay
illustrated
of
been
(data
mixture
seen we
active
sequence
the is
removal
RNase
pretreatment
described
substrate
to
heart
interpretation
completed as
be
after
used
such or
MN for
no
Vol.
96, No.
pretreatment cell
of
RNase
protease
2).
where
precipitation
residual
BNase lane
is
BIOPHYSICAL
and
shown
that
to
included
RESEARCH
which
be
in
P does
prior
to
free
all
Koski of
our
COMMUNICATIONS
used
to
proteases.
inactivate
In
pretreatment
of
BNase (NB4)2SO4 Methods.
assays
of
some
the
KB
addition
mixtures
to
BNase
then
further
Even
after
relevant 2A,
fractions 2-4).
soluble
the
the
(see
To
digested
by we
A pretreated
apparent
with
exclude
BNase
of
gradient
where
were
BNase
A in
reconstruction
to
reaction
RNase
834
BNase mixtures containing
P activity.
the
fractionated
by
described
evident
in in
there
gradient,
presumably
presence control is
A pretreated with
from
particular,
activity
polyacrylamide that
mixtures, for
out
Tl
2.
enzyme
the
RNase
Fig.
the is
(N84)2S04
the
such
carried
A bound possibility
no
the the
BNase to
lane
in
sucrose
of
A was
this
containing
the
by
as
In
of
products
were
RNase
in
whereas
lC,
2B).
fractionated amount
sedimentation
residual
gradient
were
respect
mixtures
Nevertheless,
the
samples,
Figure
precipitated the
under
residue with
fraction
containing
experiments
in
(Fig.
size. the
last
velocity
bottom
of
small
is
residual
assayed
top
from
A and
result.
RNase
its
the
(NB4)2S04
mixtures
observed
some
activity
breakdown
the
shown
loses
a slight
pretreatment
fractions
gradient
These
by
so,
accumulated
A pretreated
A which
the
2-4)
BNase
samples,
at
as
steps
in
fractions
from
same
in
Even
result
Tl
mixtures
removed
end
these
precipitate
P.
the
Methods)
gradient
of
lanes
by
purified
BNase
because
evident
the
activity
and
RNase
RNase
unresuspended
sediment
same
P is
sucrose
fractionation,
for
The
BNase
pretreatment
of
shown).
with
not
the
purification (see
degradative
does
(8),
is
A oretreatment: and
P pretreated
Tl
assay
activity
(not
inactivation
lanes
RNaSe
RNase
Further
mixtures
(Fig.
RNase
centrifugation
these
the
been
Since
Tl
2).
gradient
due
has
PMSF
lane
conditions
and
and
P (1)
uretreatment:
lC,
the
BNase
AND
.
(Fig.
1C.
coli
P (7).
RNasel
be
IL
inhibitor
Methods)
by
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980
is
expected
of
BNase
treated seen
P in sample
in
the
sample
various
to
same
(Fig.
2B,
concentrations beads
and
P cleavage
both
yielded
products
containing
the
the might
pretreated
control
We detected
of
treated both
BNase
Vol.
96, No.
8lOCHEMlCAL
2, 1980
12 34 k-
Origin
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
123468101214CR
68101214CR
8. -*
i
”
n
Figure 2: Sucrose gradient fractionation of RNase P after pretreatment with RNase P vas pretreated rith RNase A as described in the Methods. RNase A. The mixtures (with RNase A and control lacking RNase A) were then fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation and the relevant resuspended pellet layered on sucrose gradient as described in Methods. Gradient fractions (1 pl aliquots) vere then assayed for RNase P activity. The figure shows an autoradiogram of the polyacrylamide gel analysis of the RNase P assay. The numbered lanes indicate relevant gradient fractions with number 1 being the bottom of the gradient. Fractions not shown in the autoradiogram had no activity. A. Control pretreatment (no RNase A). The lane labeled ‘C’ was a control incubation with no added material from the sucrose gradient. The lane labeled ‘R’ vas a reconstruction (see Text) with equal amounts of material from Fig. 2A lane 4 and Fig. 2B lane 4. The position of the RNase P cleavage products are indicated in the figure. Small amounts of spontaneous breakdown products or RNase A break down products (Fig. 2B) are visible in the autoradiogram. They do not have the same mobility as the RNase P cleavage fragments (see Fig. 2B lane 1 especially).
P and
RNase
mixing 2A,
for lane
RNase in
A activities the
4 and
Fig.
2B, is
subsequent Baovant
RNase Methods) preformed
P preparation
Cs2S04
indicate
that
recovery
of
activity,
level
as
RNase
of
crude
was
further buffer
is
of very
this
poor.
835
2A,
lane
RNase conditions
P:
The
S16
by
(N84)2S04
0.2M
m4C1
Fig.
is RNase
that is
not
we
from
an (see
centrifuged
in
in
3.
about P has
Figure
1.33
lost
used.
precipitaion and
before
R with
fraction
shown
results,
coli
alone
A and
the
material E.
samples
under RNase
The
the
demonstrates
with
‘IN with
Methods).
density
Fig.
pretreatment
heart
in
experiment
fractionated
(see
3-S%
this
P activity
veal
versus
buoyant
the
seen
(compare
Thus,
by
for
g radient the
4).
abolished
dialysed
same experiment
lane
assay
densitv
and
the
reconstruction
P activity
the
at
g/cm3.
a buoyant
a
The
Vol.
96, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
2, 1980
I
AND
3
5
BIOPHYSICAL
7
FRACTION
9
II
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
13
NUMBER
Figure 3: Cs2SO4 buoyant density determination of veal heart Wase P. Centrifugation was carried out as described in the Methods. (0) BNase P activity quantitated by measuring radioactivity in gel slices from analyses assay mixtures for RNase P activity in gradient fractions. (Xl Protein concentration as determined by the method of Bradford (10). The two arrows indicate the position of DNA and hemoglobin markers as determined in separate experiments (see Text).
density
of
buoyant
densities
1.43
g/&
complex due
and is
to
1.55
g/cm3
under
of
various
E.
coli
denser
the
conditions
markers
tRNA Tyr:
than
presence
similar
protein
of
(hemoglobin: 1.38
but
a nucleic
(unpublished
g/cm31
less acid
show
dense
of
experiments).
1.25
g/cm’;
that
the
than
RNA or
be
inactivated
calf veal
DNA
The thymus
heart (91,
DNA
RNase presumably
component.
DISCDSSION We have with
any
of
pancreatic the
shown the
three
RNase
between
inactivated
by
characteristic evidence
that
been
heart
RNase
with
the
buoyant
that
of
presented
with
to
the
and
of protein.
veal
Cs2S04
cou
RNase
P is
also
complex
(1).
In
836
1 or
studies P in
A and
enzyme
T
RNase
E.
the
pretreatment
heart
RNase
that
RNase
inactivation
MN and
show
by
nuolease,
functional
density RNA
an RNA-protein
P can
micrococcal
Consistent
pretreatment of
has
veal
ribonucleases,
A.
observation
intermediate
that
also this
has latter
requires
a buoyant case an RNA
is is
density further component
P
Vol.
96, No.
2, 1980
vivo.
The
in veal
heart
reason
and
explanations
E.
be
with modified
centrifugation
for coli
can
associated highly
BIOCHEMICAL
RNase put
or
have
more
secondary
smaller
than
together
with
data
This
The the
somewhat
Acknowlednements: assistance. S.A.
is
does
these
P from
P complexes
than
All
RNase
between
forward.
conditions.
that
regarding any
source
observed
contribute
coli
will
We are indebted work was supported
be
and consist
to
E.
complexed
Isabel by grants
have it
could
RNase
P,
Our
for excellent the USPBS
RNA
more our
membrane buoyant
density
results,
suggest
an RNA-protein
Pinto from
be
under
the P.
the
a smaller
with
making
RNase
KB cell of
or
of
several
structure
to coli
may
P,
COMMUNICATIONS
density but
enzyme
tertiary
could
for
buoyant
apparent
RNase and
it
could
E.
not
procaryotic
RESEARCH
the
mammalian
Lastly, factors
BIOPHYSICAL
discrepancy
it
fragments.
that
the
AND
taken strongly
complex.
and
technical the NSF
to
Referenoes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Stark, B.C., Kale, R., Bowman, E. J.. and Altman. S. (1978). Acad. Sci. (USA). 15. 3717-3721. Kole. R., and Altman, S. (1979) ibid. 76. 3195-3199. Kale, R., Baer, M.F., Stark, B.C. and Altman, S. (1980) Cell 881-887. (1978) International Review of Biochemistry, 17, Altman. S. Clark, ed. (Baltimore: University Park Press). pp. 19-44. (1976) Cell 9, Koski, R.A., Bothwell, A.L.M. and Altman, S. (1979) Cell 17, 389-397. Garber, R.L. and Al tman, S. Koski, R.A., (1978) Ph.D. Thesis, (New Haven, Yale Universitv). Uchida, T. and Egami, F. (1971) The Enzymes, 4, P.D. Bayer, York, Academic Press) pp. 205-250. (1968) Methods in Enzymology, XII Part B.. L. Szybalski. W. K. Moldave, eds., (New York: Academic Press). pp. 330-361. Bradford, M.M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254.
837
Proc.
Nat.
19, B.F.C. 101-116.
ed. Grossman
(New and