- Email: [email protected]
von Brünn Nests Hyperplasia as a Cause of Ureteral Stenosis After Kidney Transplantation
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
Von Brünn Nests Hyperplasia as a Cause of Ureteral Stenosis After Kidney Transplantation Mouad Hamzaoui1,4, Arnaud Francois2, Guillaume Defortescu3, Isabelle Etienne1, Charlotte Laurent1, Dominique Bertrand1 and Dominique Guerrot1,4
Q9
1
Service de Néphrologie, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, Rouen, France; 2Service d’Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, Rouen, France; 3Service d’Urologie, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, Rouen, France; and 4INSERM Unité 1096, Université de Médecine-Pharmacie de Rouen, Rouen, France Correspondence: Dominique Guerrot, Service de Néphrologie – CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, Rouen, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Kidney Int Rep (2016) -, -–-; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2016.11.008 ª 2016 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION rologic complications occur in 2.5% to 20% of patients after kidney transplantation, and are an important cause of allograft loss and patient morbidity.1–6 The most frequent technical adverse events stem from complications of the ureterovesical anastomosis, including urinary fistulae, and stenosis.3 An intrinsic ureteral stricture can also occur as a consequence of local inflammation, infection, or inadequate vascularization resulting in ischemia of the ureteral transplant.1,6 Von Brünn nests are considered as a variant of the normal urinary tract histology, and originate from the proliferation of benign urothelial cells within the lamina propria.7–9 This particular structure develops mainly in the bladder, but can also be found in the ureters. To date, von Brünn nests have not been described as a potential cause of ureteral stenosis. Here, we report the first case of posttransplantation obstructive kidney failure due to the hyperplasia of ureteral von Brünn nests, analyze the origin of the proliferating cells, and discuss pathophysiological mechanisms and potential clinical implications.
U
Q2
CASE PRESENTATION A 63-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease due to IgA nephropathy received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Computed tomography performed in the 60-year-old female donor had revealed no specific anomaly of the kidneys or of the urinary tract. During the preparation of the allograft, the macroscopic appearances of the kidney and the ureter were unremarkable. The kidney was implanted in the left iliac
fossa. A double J stent was used for the ureteric reimplantation, and no significant issue was noted during the surgical procedure. The cold and warm ischemia times were 8 hours and 65 minutes, respectively. The standardized immunosuppressive regimen prescribed to the patient included basiliximab and methylprednisolone pulses as the induction treatment, followed by the association of tacrolimus, mycophe- Q3 nolate mofetil, and prednisolone. The postoperative outcome was favorable. No infection was recorded. Plasma creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl 14 days after transplantation and remained stable until the double J stent was removed 4 weeks later, in accordance with the local protocol. Three months after the removal of the double J stent, the patient’s plasma creatinine increased from 1.3 to 1.8 mg/dl within 3 weeks. A urinary tract ultrasound was performed, and showed a large, 28-mm dilatation of the allograft pelvis. This dilatation was confirmed by a computed tomography scan (Figure 1). The radiological appearance suggested that the stenosis was located mainly in the very proximal part of the ureter below the pelviureteral junction, mimicking a pyeloureteral junction syndrome. A furosemide 99m Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy revealed slow clearance of pelvicalyceal and ureteral activity in the allograft, consistent with a pathophysiological significance of the obstruction. The decision was taken to perform a pyeloureteral anastomosis with the left native ureter, and to resect the donor ureter for histological analysis. The patient initially refused the urological management, and neither temporary stent placement nor retrograde ureteropyelography was performed in this context. The follow-up showed persistent
Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
1
52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
Figure 1. Computed tomography scanner. Pyelocalyceal dilation and dilation of the proximal ureter.
hydronephrosis. Plasma creatinine progressively increased, up to 2.3 mg/dl when the pyeloureteral anastomosis was finally performed 3 months after the diagnosis. After surgery, plasma creatinine decreased to 1.4 mg/dl. Pathological analysis of the ureteral allograft (pyeloureteral junction and a 3-cm-long fragment of the proximal ureter) revealed a multifocal narrowing of the lumen due to a florid circumferential hyperplasia of von Brünn nests strictly limited to the lamina propria, within the ureteral wall (Figure 2).
web 4C=FPO
103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156
M Hamzaoui et al.: Ureteral von Brünn Hyperplasia After Kidney Transplantation Q1
Figure 2. Histological analysis of the proximal part of the allograft ureter. Hyperplasia of von Brünn nests, characterized by multifocal proliferation in the lamina propria, devoid of cellular atypia. Hematoxylin and eosin safran staining. Original magnification (a) 10, (b) 40. 2
No atypia was present, and SV40 staining was negative. To determine whether the von Brünn nests stemmed from the donor or whether they were a retrograde proliferation originating from the recipient’s bladder, we took advantage of the sex difference between the 2 subjects. We performed a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with CEP “X” and “Y” probes (DXZ1 and DYZ3, Vysis kit, Abbott, France) on Q4 both the allograft ureter and on a biopsy of the proximal left native ureter. External controls were satisfactory. The internal control (native ureter) presented a characteristic “XY” phenotype, as expected. We found a double “XX” fluorescence within the von Brünn nests, confirming the donor origin (Figure 3). Over an 18-month follow-up, plasma creatinine was stable, and no recurrence or additional urological complication was noted. DISCUSSION Von Brünn nests are benign proliferative and metaplastic lesions of the urinary tract. They are caused by the invagination of overlying urothelial cells, which aggregate into round nests within the superficial lamina propria.7,9,10 Their most frequent location is the bladder trigone and the submucosa of the pelviureteral junction. This specific histological condition can be highly prevalent, with autopsy series revealing that up to 90% of bladders present with von Brünn nests.9 Von Brünn nests are usually devoid of atypia; however, they can undergo hyperplasia and become visible on bladder cystoscopy as pink or white submucosal blebs. More rarely, they can undergo central cystic degeneration (cystitis cystica), or atypical glandular differenciation (cystitis glandularis) and become visible on ultrasound.7,11,12 The main differential diagnosis is nested cell urothelial carcinoma.12–14 This diagnosis can be excluded in our patient because of the focal localization limited to the lamina propria, the absence of cellular atypia, and the favorable evolution. In rare cases, von Brünn nests can lead to obstruction of the cystic outlet or of the ureterovesical junction, after cystic degeneration.8,10,11 To the best of our knowledge, hyperplasia of von Brünn nests has not been described as a potential cause of ureteral stenosis below the pelviureteral junction, and no urological complication related to von Brünn nests in solid organ transplant recipients has been previously reported. In our case, after careful reviewing of the clinical, laboratory, radiologic, peroperative, and pathological data, no argument for an alternative ischemic, infectious, neoplastic, or mechanical cause of this incomplete ureteral stenosis was found. Because of the artifactual increase in the lumen diameter due to fixation, the photograph shown in Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
web 4C=FPO
M Hamzaoui et al.: Ureteral von Brünn Hyperplasia After Kidney Transplantation
Figure 3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of (a) the allograft and (b) the native ureters. The X chromosome is revealed by the green probe and Q8 the Y chromosome by the red probe. (a) Von Brünn nests exclusively present X probes in the allograft ureter, which demonstrates that the proliferation originates from the donor. (b) As expected, in the recipient’s native ureter, X and Y probes were expressed together.
Figure 2 most likely underestimates the narrowing of the ureteral lumen present in vivo. In addition, the blood flow, edema, and contraction of the ureteral smooth muscle cells are dynamic factors that further decrease the diameter of the lumen, whereas they are totally absent when evaluated on pathological material. In kidney transplant recipients, proliferative lesions of the urinary tract can originate from local or metaplastic growth of recipient cells or of donor-transmitted cells, as is the case in nephrogenic adenoma.15 Here, using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we demonstrated that the ureteral obstruction was the direct consequence of local hyperplasia of donor-transmitted cells. Importantly, the donor’s initial CT scan was unremarkable, and the contralateral kidney presented with no pyelocalyceal dilatation 6 months after transplantation in the other recipient, which suggests that specific factors in our patient triggered posttransplantation hyperplasia of the preexisting von Brünn nests.
Pathophysiological mechanisms leading to hyperplasia of von Brünn nests have been poorly studied, but are believed to include ischemia, infection, inflammation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.7,9–11,16,17 One study has shown that cells of von Brünn nests synthesize and express fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 10 receptor, and that a paracrine synthesis of FGF-10 is present in the vicinity of von Brünn nests in the exstrophic bladder.18 FGF-related signaling could therefore be a key factor in the proliferation of von Brünn nests.19 Vinsonneau et al. have demonstrated that urothelial proliferation happens following ischemic injury, and, interestingly, that this event is dependent on fibroblast growth factor signaling.20 In this context, we speculate that the transplantation-related ischemia contributed to the hyperplasia of the preexisting von Brünn nests in our patient. In addition, although no infection was recorded during the posttransplantation period, the insertion of the double J stent and its presence during 4 weeks may have induced and sustained local inflammation.
Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
3
265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372
M Hamzaoui et al.: Ureteral von Brünn Hyperplasia After Kidney Transplantation
No specific management has been suggested for von Brünn nest hyperplasia, except for the treatment of potential inducing factors. This is most likely because of the benign nature of the proliferation and the rarity of complications. In our case, the diagnosis was not suspected before the results of the histological analysis. Whether the proliferation and the chronic obstruction could have been improved with an alternative medical management, for example with high-dose corticosteroids, is uncertain.16 No spontaneous improvement was observed, although the patient decided to postpone the surgery. Ultimately, the pyeloureteral anastomosis offered a definitive treatment. In conclusion, this case presents an unusual and potentially underestimated cause of obstructive decrease in kidney function after transplantation. Awareness of this condition can be useful for nephrologists, urologists, radiologists, and pathologists involved in the care of solid organ transplant recipients. DISCLOSURE All the authors declared no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Carole Basset and Dr. Maxime Arnaud (Pathology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France) for their technical assistance, and Dr. Géraldine Joly-Helas (Department of Genetics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France) for kindly providing the probes for the fluorescence in situ hybridization. Q5
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Figure S1. --Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at www.kireports.org.
REFERENCES 1. Palazzetti A, Oderda M, Dalmasso E, et al. Urological consequences following renal transplantation: a review of the literature. Urologia. 2015;82:211–218. 2. Nie ZL, Zhang KQ, Li QS, et al. Urological complications in 1, 223 kidney transplantations. Urol Int. 2009;83:337–341. 3. Pisani F, Iaria G, D’Angelo M, et al. Urologic complications in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:2521–2522. 4. Kocak T, Nane I, Ander H, et al. Urological and surgical complications in 362 consecutive living related donor kidney transplantations. Urol Int. 2004;72:252–256.
4
5. Hussain M, Khalique M, Askari H, et al. Surgical complications after renal transplantation in a living-related transplantation program at SIUT. Transplant Proc. 1999;31:3211. 6. Makisalo H, Eklund B, Salmela K, et al. Urological complications after 2084 consecutive kidney transplantations. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:152–153. 7. Erturk E, Sheinfeld J, Davis RS. Metaplastic cystitis complicated with Von Brunn nests, cystitis cystica, and intestinal type of glandular metaplasia. Urology. 1988;32:165–167. 8. Franco I, Eshghi M, Schutte H, et al. Bladder neck obstruction secondary to Brunn’s cyst. J Urol. 1988;139:126–127. 9. Wiener DP, Koss LG, Sablay B, Freed SZ. The prevalence and significance of Brunn’s nests, cystitis cystica and squamous metaplasia in normal bladders. J Urol. 1979;122: 317–321. 10. Sailo SL, Sailo L. Brunn’s cyst: a rare cause of bladder outlet obstruction in a young man. Urol J. 2015;12:2381. 11. Grimsby GM, Tyson MD, Salevitz B, et al. Bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a Brunn’s cyst. Curr Urol. 2012;6: 50–52. 12. Volmar KE, Chan TY, De Marzo AM, Epstein JI. Florid von Brunn nests mimicking urothelial carcinoma: a morphologic and immunohistochemical comparison to the nested variant of urothelial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27: 1243–1252. 13. Venyo AK. Nested variant of urothelial carcinoma. Adv Urol. Q7 2014;192720. 14. Pusztaszeri M, Hauser J, Iselin C, et al. Urothelial carcinoma “nested variant” of renal pelvis and ureter. Urology. 2007;69, 778.e715–777. 15. Mazal PR, Schaufler R, Altenhuber-Muller R, et al. Derivation of nephrogenic adenomas from renal tubular cells in kidney-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347: 653–659. 16. Yuksel OH, Urkmez A, Erdogru T, Verit A. The role of steroid treatment in intractable cystitis glandularis: a case report and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:E306–E309. 17. Liu X, Chen Z, Ye Z. Etiological study on cystitis glandularis caused by bacterial infection. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2007;27:678–680. 18. Eastman R Jr., Leaf EM, Zhang D, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-10 signals development of von Brunn’s nests in the exstrophic bladder. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299: F1094–F1110. 19. Walker KA, Sims-Lucas S, Bates CM. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in kidney and lower urinary tract develQ6 opment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015. 20. Vinsonneau C, Girshovich A, M’Rad MB, et al. Intrarenal urothelium proliferation: an unexpected early event following ischemic injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299: F479–F486.
Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
Von Brünn Nests Hyperplasia as a Cause of Ureteral Stenosis After Kidney Transplantation Mouad Hamzaoui1,4, Arnaud Francois2, Guillaume Defortescu3, Isabelle Etienne1, Charlotte Laurent1, Dominique Bertrand1 and Dominique Guerrot1,4
Q9
1
Service de Néphrologie, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, Rouen, France; 2Service d’Anatomie Pathologique, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, Rouen, France; 3Service d’Urologie, CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, Rouen, France; and 4INSERM Unité 1096, Université de Médecine-Pharmacie de Rouen, Rouen, France Correspondence: Dominique Guerrot, Service de Néphrologie – CHU Hôpitaux de Rouen, 1 rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, Rouen, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Kidney Int Rep (2016) -, -–-; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2016.11.008 ª 2016 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION rologic complications occur in 2.5% to 20% of patients after kidney transplantation, and are an important cause of allograft loss and patient morbidity.1–6 The most frequent technical adverse events stem from complications of the ureterovesical anastomosis, including urinary fistulae, and stenosis.3 An intrinsic ureteral stricture can also occur as a consequence of local inflammation, infection, or inadequate vascularization resulting in ischemia of the ureteral transplant.1,6 Von Brünn nests are considered as a variant of the normal urinary tract histology, and originate from the proliferation of benign urothelial cells within the lamina propria.7–9 This particular structure develops mainly in the bladder, but can also be found in the ureters. To date, von Brünn nests have not been described as a potential cause of ureteral stenosis. Here, we report the first case of posttransplantation obstructive kidney failure due to the hyperplasia of ureteral von Brünn nests, analyze the origin of the proliferating cells, and discuss pathophysiological mechanisms and potential clinical implications.
U
Q2
CASE PRESENTATION A 63-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease due to IgA nephropathy received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Computed tomography performed in the 60-year-old female donor had revealed no specific anomaly of the kidneys or of the urinary tract. During the preparation of the allograft, the macroscopic appearances of the kidney and the ureter were unremarkable. The kidney was implanted in the left iliac
fossa. A double J stent was used for the ureteric reimplantation, and no significant issue was noted during the surgical procedure. The cold and warm ischemia times were 8 hours and 65 minutes, respectively. The standardized immunosuppressive regimen prescribed to the patient included basiliximab and methylprednisolone pulses as the induction treatment, followed by the association of tacrolimus, mycophe- Q3 nolate mofetil, and prednisolone. The postoperative outcome was favorable. No infection was recorded. Plasma creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl 14 days after transplantation and remained stable until the double J stent was removed 4 weeks later, in accordance with the local protocol. Three months after the removal of the double J stent, the patient’s plasma creatinine increased from 1.3 to 1.8 mg/dl within 3 weeks. A urinary tract ultrasound was performed, and showed a large, 28-mm dilatation of the allograft pelvis. This dilatation was confirmed by a computed tomography scan (Figure 1). The radiological appearance suggested that the stenosis was located mainly in the very proximal part of the ureter below the pelviureteral junction, mimicking a pyeloureteral junction syndrome. A furosemide 99m Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy revealed slow clearance of pelvicalyceal and ureteral activity in the allograft, consistent with a pathophysiological significance of the obstruction. The decision was taken to perform a pyeloureteral anastomosis with the left native ureter, and to resect the donor ureter for histological analysis. The patient initially refused the urological management, and neither temporary stent placement nor retrograde ureteropyelography was performed in this context. The follow-up showed persistent
Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
1
52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
Figure 1. Computed tomography scanner. Pyelocalyceal dilation and dilation of the proximal ureter.
hydronephrosis. Plasma creatinine progressively increased, up to 2.3 mg/dl when the pyeloureteral anastomosis was finally performed 3 months after the diagnosis. After surgery, plasma creatinine decreased to 1.4 mg/dl. Pathological analysis of the ureteral allograft (pyeloureteral junction and a 3-cm-long fragment of the proximal ureter) revealed a multifocal narrowing of the lumen due to a florid circumferential hyperplasia of von Brünn nests strictly limited to the lamina propria, within the ureteral wall (Figure 2).
web 4C=FPO
103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156
M Hamzaoui et al.: Ureteral von Brünn Hyperplasia After Kidney Transplantation Q1
Figure 2. Histological analysis of the proximal part of the allograft ureter. Hyperplasia of von Brünn nests, characterized by multifocal proliferation in the lamina propria, devoid of cellular atypia. Hematoxylin and eosin safran staining. Original magnification (a) 10, (b) 40. 2
No atypia was present, and SV40 staining was negative. To determine whether the von Brünn nests stemmed from the donor or whether they were a retrograde proliferation originating from the recipient’s bladder, we took advantage of the sex difference between the 2 subjects. We performed a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with CEP “X” and “Y” probes (DXZ1 and DYZ3, Vysis kit, Abbott, France) on Q4 both the allograft ureter and on a biopsy of the proximal left native ureter. External controls were satisfactory. The internal control (native ureter) presented a characteristic “XY” phenotype, as expected. We found a double “XX” fluorescence within the von Brünn nests, confirming the donor origin (Figure 3). Over an 18-month follow-up, plasma creatinine was stable, and no recurrence or additional urological complication was noted. DISCUSSION Von Brünn nests are benign proliferative and metaplastic lesions of the urinary tract. They are caused by the invagination of overlying urothelial cells, which aggregate into round nests within the superficial lamina propria.7,9,10 Their most frequent location is the bladder trigone and the submucosa of the pelviureteral junction. This specific histological condition can be highly prevalent, with autopsy series revealing that up to 90% of bladders present with von Brünn nests.9 Von Brünn nests are usually devoid of atypia; however, they can undergo hyperplasia and become visible on bladder cystoscopy as pink or white submucosal blebs. More rarely, they can undergo central cystic degeneration (cystitis cystica), or atypical glandular differenciation (cystitis glandularis) and become visible on ultrasound.7,11,12 The main differential diagnosis is nested cell urothelial carcinoma.12–14 This diagnosis can be excluded in our patient because of the focal localization limited to the lamina propria, the absence of cellular atypia, and the favorable evolution. In rare cases, von Brünn nests can lead to obstruction of the cystic outlet or of the ureterovesical junction, after cystic degeneration.8,10,11 To the best of our knowledge, hyperplasia of von Brünn nests has not been described as a potential cause of ureteral stenosis below the pelviureteral junction, and no urological complication related to von Brünn nests in solid organ transplant recipients has been previously reported. In our case, after careful reviewing of the clinical, laboratory, radiologic, peroperative, and pathological data, no argument for an alternative ischemic, infectious, neoplastic, or mechanical cause of this incomplete ureteral stenosis was found. Because of the artifactual increase in the lumen diameter due to fixation, the photograph shown in Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
web 4C=FPO
M Hamzaoui et al.: Ureteral von Brünn Hyperplasia After Kidney Transplantation
Figure 3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of (a) the allograft and (b) the native ureters. The X chromosome is revealed by the green probe and Q8 the Y chromosome by the red probe. (a) Von Brünn nests exclusively present X probes in the allograft ureter, which demonstrates that the proliferation originates from the donor. (b) As expected, in the recipient’s native ureter, X and Y probes were expressed together.
Figure 2 most likely underestimates the narrowing of the ureteral lumen present in vivo. In addition, the blood flow, edema, and contraction of the ureteral smooth muscle cells are dynamic factors that further decrease the diameter of the lumen, whereas they are totally absent when evaluated on pathological material. In kidney transplant recipients, proliferative lesions of the urinary tract can originate from local or metaplastic growth of recipient cells or of donor-transmitted cells, as is the case in nephrogenic adenoma.15 Here, using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we demonstrated that the ureteral obstruction was the direct consequence of local hyperplasia of donor-transmitted cells. Importantly, the donor’s initial CT scan was unremarkable, and the contralateral kidney presented with no pyelocalyceal dilatation 6 months after transplantation in the other recipient, which suggests that specific factors in our patient triggered posttransplantation hyperplasia of the preexisting von Brünn nests.
Pathophysiological mechanisms leading to hyperplasia of von Brünn nests have been poorly studied, but are believed to include ischemia, infection, inflammation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.7,9–11,16,17 One study has shown that cells of von Brünn nests synthesize and express fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 10 receptor, and that a paracrine synthesis of FGF-10 is present in the vicinity of von Brünn nests in the exstrophic bladder.18 FGF-related signaling could therefore be a key factor in the proliferation of von Brünn nests.19 Vinsonneau et al. have demonstrated that urothelial proliferation happens following ischemic injury, and, interestingly, that this event is dependent on fibroblast growth factor signaling.20 In this context, we speculate that the transplantation-related ischemia contributed to the hyperplasia of the preexisting von Brünn nests in our patient. In addition, although no infection was recorded during the posttransplantation period, the insertion of the double J stent and its presence during 4 weeks may have induced and sustained local inflammation.
Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
3
265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318
NEPHROLOGY ROUNDS
319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372
M Hamzaoui et al.: Ureteral von Brünn Hyperplasia After Kidney Transplantation
No specific management has been suggested for von Brünn nest hyperplasia, except for the treatment of potential inducing factors. This is most likely because of the benign nature of the proliferation and the rarity of complications. In our case, the diagnosis was not suspected before the results of the histological analysis. Whether the proliferation and the chronic obstruction could have been improved with an alternative medical management, for example with high-dose corticosteroids, is uncertain.16 No spontaneous improvement was observed, although the patient decided to postpone the surgery. Ultimately, the pyeloureteral anastomosis offered a definitive treatment. In conclusion, this case presents an unusual and potentially underestimated cause of obstructive decrease in kidney function after transplantation. Awareness of this condition can be useful for nephrologists, urologists, radiologists, and pathologists involved in the care of solid organ transplant recipients. DISCLOSURE All the authors declared no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Carole Basset and Dr. Maxime Arnaud (Pathology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France) for their technical assistance, and Dr. Géraldine Joly-Helas (Department of Genetics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France) for kindly providing the probes for the fluorescence in situ hybridization. Q5
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Figure S1. --Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at www.kireports.org.
REFERENCES 1. Palazzetti A, Oderda M, Dalmasso E, et al. Urological consequences following renal transplantation: a review of the literature. Urologia. 2015;82:211–218. 2. Nie ZL, Zhang KQ, Li QS, et al. Urological complications in 1, 223 kidney transplantations. Urol Int. 2009;83:337–341. 3. Pisani F, Iaria G, D’Angelo M, et al. Urologic complications in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:2521–2522. 4. Kocak T, Nane I, Ander H, et al. Urological and surgical complications in 362 consecutive living related donor kidney transplantations. Urol Int. 2004;72:252–256.
4
5. Hussain M, Khalique M, Askari H, et al. Surgical complications after renal transplantation in a living-related transplantation program at SIUT. Transplant Proc. 1999;31:3211. 6. Makisalo H, Eklund B, Salmela K, et al. Urological complications after 2084 consecutive kidney transplantations. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:152–153. 7. Erturk E, Sheinfeld J, Davis RS. Metaplastic cystitis complicated with Von Brunn nests, cystitis cystica, and intestinal type of glandular metaplasia. Urology. 1988;32:165–167. 8. Franco I, Eshghi M, Schutte H, et al. Bladder neck obstruction secondary to Brunn’s cyst. J Urol. 1988;139:126–127. 9. Wiener DP, Koss LG, Sablay B, Freed SZ. The prevalence and significance of Brunn’s nests, cystitis cystica and squamous metaplasia in normal bladders. J Urol. 1979;122: 317–321. 10. Sailo SL, Sailo L. Brunn’s cyst: a rare cause of bladder outlet obstruction in a young man. Urol J. 2015;12:2381. 11. Grimsby GM, Tyson MD, Salevitz B, et al. Bladder outlet obstruction secondary to a Brunn’s cyst. Curr Urol. 2012;6: 50–52. 12. Volmar KE, Chan TY, De Marzo AM, Epstein JI. Florid von Brunn nests mimicking urothelial carcinoma: a morphologic and immunohistochemical comparison to the nested variant of urothelial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27: 1243–1252. 13. Venyo AK. Nested variant of urothelial carcinoma. Adv Urol. Q7 2014;192720. 14. Pusztaszeri M, Hauser J, Iselin C, et al. Urothelial carcinoma “nested variant” of renal pelvis and ureter. Urology. 2007;69, 778.e715–777. 15. Mazal PR, Schaufler R, Altenhuber-Muller R, et al. Derivation of nephrogenic adenomas from renal tubular cells in kidney-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347: 653–659. 16. Yuksel OH, Urkmez A, Erdogru T, Verit A. The role of steroid treatment in intractable cystitis glandularis: a case report and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:E306–E309. 17. Liu X, Chen Z, Ye Z. Etiological study on cystitis glandularis caused by bacterial infection. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2007;27:678–680. 18. Eastman R Jr., Leaf EM, Zhang D, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-10 signals development of von Brunn’s nests in the exstrophic bladder. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299: F1094–F1110. 19. Walker KA, Sims-Lucas S, Bates CM. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in kidney and lower urinary tract develQ6 opment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015. 20. Vinsonneau C, Girshovich A, M’Rad MB, et al. Intrarenal urothelium proliferation: an unexpected early event following ischemic injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299: F479–F486.
Kidney International Reports (2016) -, -–-
CRP 5.4.0 DTD EKIR80_proof 19 December 2016 3:40 pm ce
373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426