JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
VOL. 9, NO. 14, 2016
ª 2016 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER
ISSN 1936-8798/$36.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.044
EDITORIAL COMMENT
Walking the Tightrope Between Suppressing Ischemia and Minimizing Bleeding* Robert J. Applegate, MD
I
n today’s practice a growing emphasis has been
Implantation) trial randomized 604 patients to 6
placed on the risk of bleeding arising from thera-
weeks versus 6 months of TAT after PCI with drug-
pies
and
eluting stents (DES), achieved by discontinuing clo-
ischemic events after percutaneous coronary inter-
pidogrel at these time points (1). The primary study
vention (PCI), particularly in patients requiring
endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial
concomitant oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC). In an
infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis, stroke or
ideal world reduction of both thrombosis and
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major
ischemic risks would be achieved with minimal
bleeding. At 9 months, the primary composite
bleeding and with a single medication. Currently,
endpoint occurred in 9.8% of patients treated with
however, dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is needed
6 weeks of TAT, and in 8.8% of those receiving
aimed
at
suppressing
thrombotic
for patients undergoing stenting, and is superior to
6 months of TAT (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14; 95% confi-
anticoagulation for this indication, and OAC is
dence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 1.91; p ¼ 0.63). Secondary
needed to reduce the thrombotic risk from conditions
endpoints of thrombotic and ischemic events, and
such as atrial fibrillation and mechanical heart valves,
bleeding, were also similar for the 2 groups. The au-
whereas DAPT or a P2Y12 inhibitor is not as effective.
thors concluded that the shorter duration of TAT was
Because the need for OAC in patients undergoing
not superior to 6 months of TAT. However, many
stent placement is not infrequent, the need for triple
have interpreted this study to indicate that short term
anticoagulant therapy (TAT) (i.e., DAPT and OAC) is
TAT is preferable to longer term TAT, particularly in
common. Unfortunately, these patients are exposed
patients at high risk for bleeding. Taking a somewhat
to a higher bleeding risk as a result of the combina-
different approach, the WOEST (What is the Optimal
tion therapy that often makes optimal management
Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients
challenging. At the end of the day, the clinician is
with Oral Anticoagulation and Coronary Stenting)
forced to walk a tightrope between the need to reduce
trial evaluated the impact of omitting aspirin in pa-
thrombosis and ischemia while minimizing bleeding
tients requiring antithrombotic therapy after stent
risk in patients requiring TAT. However, there are
placement and compared OAC plus clopidogrel ther-
only limited randomized clinical data to guide
apy to TAT (2). The primary study endpoint was any
decision making in these patients.
bleeding to 1 year after PCI, which occurred in 19.4%
The ISAR-TRIPLE (Triple Therapy in Patients on Oral
Anticoagulation
after
Drug
Eluting
Stent
of OAC plus clopidogrel patients (n ¼ 279), and 44.6% of TAT patients (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.50; p < 0.001). A composite ischemic endpoint of death, MI, stroke, target revascularization, and stent throm-
*Editorials published in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions reflect the
bosis occurred in 11.1% of double therapy and 17.6%
views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC:
of TAT (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.91; p ¼ 0.025).
Cardiovascular Interventions or the American College of Cardiology. From the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Dr. Applegate has reported
The reduction in both bleeding and ischemic events in the WOEST trial was somewhat unanticipated, given
that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to
the belief that DAPT is necessary in the first month
disclose.
after stenting and in light of the results of the
Applegate
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 9, NO. 14, 2016 JULY 25, 2016:1484–6
Bleeding Versus Ischemia
ISAR-TRIPLE trial (i.e., no difference in bleeding).
practice, the clinician is often faced with substantial
Nonetheless, these results are intriguing. However,
gaps in knowledge when trying to decide on optimal
they also point out how much there is to learn about
therapy in any single patient. The findings from the
identifying the most important factors influencing
Bern PCI registry support the strategy of limiting TAT
thrombotic, ischemic as well as bleeding events in pa-
to 1 month in patients with high bleeding risk who
tients requiring TAT. Current guidelines recommend
require OAC after coronary stenting: bleeding com-
minimizing the duration of TAT in patients requiring
parable to a more prolonged period of TAT (although
DAPT for stents and concomitant OAC but the optimal
in patients at lower risk of bleeding) without an in-
duration and combination of TAT remains unclear.
crease in ischemic events. However, given the
SEE PAGE 1473
observational nature of these findings these results should be viewed as hypothesis generating, as
In this issue of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions,
acknowledged by the authors. In addition to the
Koskinas et al. (3) provide observations from the Bern
nonrandomized nature of the study there are a couple
PCI registry of prospectively collected clinical out-
of aspects of the study that merit discussion and may
comes data on 8,772 consecutive patients undergoing
have an impact on the ability to generalize these ob-
PCI. A total of 568 of these patients had an indication
servations. First, cessation of TAT was most often
for OAC, and these investigators stratified clinical
achieved by discontinuing the P2Y 12 inhibitor in both
outcomes by duration of TAT: 43% were discharged
groups (85% in the short TAT group, 92% in the longer
on a regimen of 1 month of TAT and 57% on a regimen
TAT group) (L. Raber, personal communication, May
of more than 1 month of TAT (median 3 months). The
2016), similar to the ISAR-TRIPLE trial. This is an
primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death,
important point as there are insufficient data to date
MI, stroke, definite stent thrombosis or TIMI major
indicating whether or not cessation of aspirin or a
bleeding within 1 year of follow-up. As the authors
P2Y 12 inhibitor is the optimal strategy in patients
describe, this “natural dichotomization” was a result
receiving DES requiring concomitant OAC therapy.
of following clinical guidelines and practice in which
Moreover, it is not clear that outcomes in patients
higher bleeding risk patients were treated with
receiving the newer P2Y 12 inhibitors ticagrelor or
shorter duration of TAT. This contention is supported
prasugrel would be similar to those in patients
by the clinical baseline characteristics of the patients
receiving clopidogrel requiring OAC therapy. Only
receiving 1 month of TAT: they were more commonly
limited data are available indicating that use of pra-
female, had higher HAS-BLED scores (hypertension,
sugrel as part of TAT is associated with a higher
abnormal liver or renal function, stroke or thrombo-
bleeding risk. Second, there were disparities of use of
embolism, bleeding history, elderly >age 65, drug
DES versus BMS between the 2 groups with BMS and
consumption, or alcohol abuse), and less often
standalone percutaneous coronary angioplasty used
received a DES. In multivariable analyses the com-
in 50% of 1 month TAT patients, but in only 9.3% of
posite primary endpoint occurred in 9.5% of 1 month
longer TAT patients. Additionally, there was a sub-
TAT patients, and in 12.9% of longer TAT patients
stantial difference in the type of DES used between
(HR: 1.007; 95% CI: 0.56 to 2.06; p ¼ 0.84). The sec-
the 2 groups. Whether or not these disparities had an
ondary composite ischemic endpoint (cardiac death,
impact on the study observations is unclear but it
MI, stroke or definite stent thrombosis) between the
certainly gives one pause in attempting to translate
2 groups was similar with a HR of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.55
the findings beyond the study population.
to 2.29; p ¼ 0.76), as was the composite secondary
Clinical investigation of the optimal approach to
bleeding endpoint (Bleeding Academic Research
the patient requiring both DAPT and OAC is compli-
Consortium bleeding $3, or TIMI major bleeding; HR:
cated by many factors, including the nonuniform
0.62; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.80; p ¼ 0.37). These results
distribution of ischemic risk after stenting, as well as
were consistent in stratified analysis in patients with
an uncertain effect of the type and intensity of anti-
acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (vs. non-ACS) as well
coagulation on the bleeding risk. The risk of stent
as those undergoing PCI with DES (vs. BMS). The
thrombosis and ischemic events post-PCI is highest in
authors concluded that 1 month of TAT, used prefer-
the first month after PCI, and is strongly influenced
entially in patients with higher estimated bleeding
by clinical presentation. Patients with ST-segment
risk, was associated with similar net clinical outcomes
elevation MI have substantially higher early stent
compared with longer TAT durations, up to 1 year of
thrombosis rates than patients with stable ischemic
clinical follow-up.
heart disease. Moreover, the complexity of coronary
Although adequately powered randomized clinical
disease, stent type, and comorbid illnesses also in-
trials provide the strongest data to help shape
fluence the risk of stent thrombosis and these affects
1485
1486
Applegate
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 9, NO. 14, 2016 JULY 25, 2016:1484–6
Bleeding Versus Ischemia
may not be simply additive. In contrast, the risk of
fibrillation who under coronary stenting will be ran-
thrombotic events such as stroke in patients with
domized to 1 of 2 “dual therapy” arms: 110 mg of
atrial fibrillation, as well as the bleeding risk in pa-
dabigatran etexilate bid and clopidogrel or ticagrelor,
tients requiring OAC is more consistent across time.
or 150 mg dabigatran etexilate bid and clopidogrel or
Use of OAC carries with it a cumulative risk deter-
ticagrelor, and compared to “triple therapy” with a
mined by the duration of the need for, and intensity,
VKA, 100 mg aspirin, and clopidogrel or ticagrelor (5).
of anticoagulant therapy. The use of novel oral anti-
Although the trial results are greatly anticipated, it is
coagulant agents introduces yet another variable in
unlikely that either 1 or both of these trials will
this complex milieu. With such a complex interaction
address all of the issues outlined previously that
of the risk of thrombotic and ischemic events, as well
affect ischemic and bleeding rates in patients
as that of bleeding, it is not surprising that identifying
requiring both DAPT and OAC.
the definitive duration of optimal TAT in patients requiring both OAC and DAPT has been uncertain.
At the end of the day, the type, and duration, of OAC and antiplatelet therapy needs to be individu-
Two large randomized clinical trials are now
alized, recognizing the differential impact of clinical
enrolling patients to help shed light on the optimal
presentation leading to coronary intervention, the
duration, and combination of antiplatelet and OAC to
bleeding risk of the patient, and the intensity and
be used in patients requiring TAT. In the PIONEER
need of OAC. The results of the Bern PCI registry
AF-PCI (A Study Exploring Two Strategies of Rivar-
should provide some comfort to practitioners that in
oxaban [JNJ39039039; BAY-59-7939] and One of Oral
patients identified at the time of a coronary inter-
Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibril-
vention to have a higher than normal bleeding risk,
lation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Inter-
a shorter duration of triple therapy can be safely
vention) trial (NCT01830543) the safety and efficacy
considered, although the exact duration of which
of 2 rivaroxaban (RIV) treatment strategies and 1
remains to be determined. As more data similar to
vitamin K antagonist (VKA) strategy will be assessed
that provided by the Bern PCI registry are available,
in 2,100 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
the tightrope that the clinician walks between
who undergo coronary stenting: 15 mg of RIV and
reducing bleeding while minimizing ischemic events
clopidogrel (or other P2Y 12 inhibitor) for 12 months
in patients who require both DAPT and OAC should
without aspirin; 2.5 mg twice daily (bid) RIV, 81 mg
get wider (more confidence) and lower to the ground
aspirin, and 1, 6, or 12 months of a P2Y12 inhibitor; and
(softer fall).
dose-adjusted International Normalized Ratio (2 to 3 target) with VKA, and DAPT for 1, 6, or 12 months (4).
REPRINT REQUESTS AND CORRESPONDENCE: Dr.
In the REDUAL-PCI (Evaluation of Dual Therapy with
Robert J. Applegate, Section of Cardiovascular Medi-
Dabigatran vs Triple Therapy with Warfarin in Pa-
cine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center
tients with AF that undergo a PCI with Stenting) study
Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-
(NCT02164864) 2,500 patients with nonvalvular atrial
1045. E-mail:
[email protected].
REFERENCES 1. Fiedler KA, Maeng M, Mehilli J, et al. Duration of triple therapy in patients requiring oral anticoagulation after drug-eluting stent implantation: the ISAR-TRIPLE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65: 1619–29.
3. Koskinas KC, Räber L, Zanchin T, et al. Duration of triple antithrombotic therapy and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2016;9: 1473–83.
2. Dewilde WJM, Oirbans T, Verheugt FWA, et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:
4. Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, et al. An openlabel, randomized, controlled, multicenter study exploring two treatment strategies of rivaroxaban and a dose-adjusted oral vitamin k antagonist
An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2013;381:1107–15.
treatment strategy in subjects with atrial fibrillation who undergo percutaneous coronary
intervention (PIONEER AF-PCI). Am Heart J 2015; 169:472–8.e5. 5. Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs. Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting (REDUAL-PCI). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT02164864. Accessed May 17, 2016.
KEY WORDS bleeding, ischemia, triple anticoagulation