Journal Pre-proof WDR62 is a novel participator in spindle migration and asymmetric cytokinesis during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation Yong-Sheng Wang, Xiao-Fei Jiao, Fan Chen, Di Wu, Zhi-Ming Ding, Yi-Liang Miao, Li-Jun Huo PII:
S0014-4827(19)30658-5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111773
Reference:
YEXCR 111773
To appear in:
Experimental Cell Research
Received Date: 26 August 2019 Revised Date:
8 December 2019
Accepted Date: 9 December 2019
Please cite this article as: Y.-S. Wang, X.-F. Jiao, F. Chen, D. Wu, Z.-M. Ding, Y.-L. Miao, L.-J. Huo, WDR62 is a novel participator in spindle migration and asymmetric cytokinesis during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation, Experimental Cell Research (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111773. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.
1
Title: WDR62 is a novel participator in spindle migration and
2
asymmetric cytokinesis during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation
3
Authors: Yong-Sheng Wang1,2, Xiao-Fei Jiao1,2, Fan Chen1,2, Di Wu1,2, Zhi-Ming
4
Ding1,2, Yi-Liang Miao1, and Li-Jun Huo1, 2*
5 6
1
7
Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong
8
Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
9
2
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of
Department of Hubei Province Engineering Research Center in Buffalo Breeding and
10
Products, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
11
*Correspondence to: Li-Jun Huo (
[email protected])
12
Tel: +86 27 87281813
13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1
23
Highlights
24
•
division in mouse oocytes.
25 26
WDR62 depletion compromised the first polar body extrusion and asymmetric
•
WDR62 knockdown disrupted spindle organization and chromosome alignment in mouse oocytes.
27 28
•
WDR62 participated in regulating meiotic spindle migration in mouse oocytes.
29
•
WDR62 participated in regulating the distribution of cortical actin and Arp2/3
30
complex in mouse oocytes.
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
2
45
Abstract
46
In female meiosis, oocyte meiotic maturation is a form of asymmetric cell
47
division, producing the first polar body and a large oocyte, in which the asymmetry of
48
oocyte meiotic division depends on spindle migration and positioning, and cortical
49
polarization. In this study, we conclude that WDR62 (WD40-repeat protein 62) plays
50
an important role for asymmetric meiotic division in mouse oocyte. Our initial study
51
demonstrated that WDR62 mainly co-localized with chromosomes during mouse
52
oocyte meiotic maturation. Interference of Wdr62 by siRNA microinjection did not
53
affect germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) but compromised the first polar body
54
extrusion (PBE) with the large polar bodies generated, which is coupled with a higher
55
incidence of spindle abnormality and chromosome misalignment. Further analysis
56
concluded that loss of WDR62 blocked asymmetric spindle positioning and actin cap
57
formation, which should be responsible for large polar body extrusion. Moreover
58
WDR62 decline intervened with the Arp2/3 complex, an upstream regulator for the
59
cortical actin. Besides for p-MAPK, a critical regulator for the asymmetric division of
60
oocyte, WDR62-depleted oocytes showed perturbation only in localization pattern but
61
not expression level. In summary, our study defines WDR62 as an essential
62
cytoskeletal regulator of spindle migration and asymmetric division during mouse
63
oocyte meiotic maturation.
64
Keywords: WDR62; oocyte; spindle migration; asymmetric cytokinesis
65 66
3
67
1. Introduction
68
In mammals, polar body emission, mainly involving nuclear division and
69
cytoplasmic asymmetric division, is indispensable mandatory for oocytes to complete
70
meiosis and confirm early embryonic development. The cytoplasmic asymmetric
71
division requests precise and accurate meiotic spindle migration and positioning, and
72
establishment of a cortical actomyosin domain overlying the spindle [1]. As germinal
73
vesicle breakdown (GVBD), the bipolar spindle assembles close to the oocyte center
74
[2], migrates to the cortex [3, 4] and activates the extrusion of a minuscule polar body
75
with one half of homologous chromosomes [5]. Taken all together, confirm that
76
oocyte has sufficient storage of maternally synthesized gene products and fuel to
77
complete the first steps of embryonic development smoothly [6]. It is widely held that
78
actin filaments mediate the spindle migration, but not the microtubules [7]. Actin is
79
mandatory for oocytes to keep their shape for growth, polarization and replication [8].
80
Moreover, several actin nucleation factors have been shown that regulates polar body
81
extrusion and cytokinesis by mediating actin-dependent spindle migration, such as
82
Arp2/3 complex [9], Fmn2[10]
83
stability are considered to be involved in regulation of asymmetric division, especially
84
MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase). In Mos
85
centrally but fail to migrate, which results in large polar body formation or symmetric
86
division [12]. Recently increasing molecules have been reported to affect the spindle
87
migration, yet the mechanism involved is not very clear and needs to be explored to
88
understand asymmetric division.
and Spire1/2 [11]. Furthermore, regulators of spindle
4
–/–
oocytes, the spindles form
89
The absence of centrosomes is another feature of oocytes. Serving as the major
90
microtubule organizing center (MTOC) in most animal cells, centrosome which
91
comprises a pair of orthogonally oriented centrioles surrounded by pericentriolar
92
material (PCM) [13] directs the assembly of the microtubule cytoskeleton during
93
mitosis [14], and it is essential for several fundamental cellular processes, including
94
cell polarity and division [15]. Moreover, increased studies have highlighted some
95
complex links between centrosome defects and cancer [16], whereas mutations in
96
centrosomal proteins have been genetically linked dwarfism and microcephaly
97
(MCPH) [17]. Contradictory to the mitotic spindles, oocyte meiotic spindles in many
98
animals totally lack centrioles, including humans and the laboratory models of mice,
99
frogs, fruit flies, and nematodes [18-21] while the spindle assembly is orchestrated by
100
the self-organization of over 80 microtubule organizing centers [22]. The
101
aforementioned contradiction raises the question what functional role centrosomal
102
proteins have during oocyte meiosis.
103
WD40-repeat protein 62 (WDR62) was first characterized as involved in the
104
assembly of signaling complexes, containing 13 annotated WD40 domain repeats
105
which spanned the N-terminal half of the protein [23]. After finding homozygous
106
missense and frame-shifting mutations in seven MCPH families [24], mutations in
107
WDR62 as the second most common cause of primary microcephaly, together with
108
ASPM, account for more than half of all cases [25]. Similar to Caenorhabditis elegans,
109
the association between MCPH proteins and centrosome is evolutionarily conserved
110
[26, 27]. The proteins, encoded by microcephaly related genes ,including WDR62 and
5
111
ASPM (abnormal spindle-like, microcephaly-associated), are localized to the mitotic
112
spindle poles, which suggest a common biological function [28]. Currently some
113
studies have proposed that WDR62 and other MCPH proteins form a hierarchy in
114
which each is required to localize another to the centrosome; besides, distinct
115
centriolar satellite proteins facilitate to localize their cognate MCPH interactors to
116
centrosomes and promote centriole duplication [29]. Moreover, it has been
117
extensively shown that decline in WDR62 causes spindle instability, decreased
118
integrity of centrosomes and dislocation of centriole from the spindle pole, spindle
119
assembly checkpoint (SAC) activation, delayed mitotic progression and cell death [23,
120
30, 31].
121
Although WDR62 exerts regulatory function during mitosis, especially in
122
centriole duplication, to our knowledge, the role of WDR62 during mouse oocyte
123
meiotic maturation remains unknown. Here, we deciphered a novel role of WDR62 in
124
spindle migration and asymmetric cytokinesis during mouse oocyte meiotic
125
maturation by employing siRNA knockdown analysis.
126
2. Methods and Materials
127
2.1 Antibodies and reagents
128
Rabbit anti-WDR62 polyclonal antibody (Cat# GTX119724) was purchased from
129
GeneTex (Irvine, CA); mouse anti-Arp3 antibody (Cat# A5979), mouse
130
anti-α-tubulin-FITC antibody (Cat# F2168) and FITC-phalloidin (Cat # P5282) was
131
purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO); rabbit anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK
132
monoclonal antibody (Cat# 4370) was purchased from CST (Danvers, MA).
133
Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) and Cy3- conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG 6
134
(H + L) were purchased from Boster Biotechnology Co., LTD (Wuhan; China). All
135
other chemicals and culture media were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company
136
(St Louis, MO) except for those specifically mentioned.
137
2.2 Animals and ethics statement
138
Wild-type Kunming strain (KM) mice were obtained from local Central Animal
139
Laboratory and housed under a 12 h light/12 h dark regimen at 22 °C with water and
140
food ad libitum. All experimental procedures of animals were performed in
141
accordance with the rules stipulated by the Animal Care and Use Committee of
142
Huazhong Agricultural University (HZAUSW-2017-005).
143
2.3 Oocyte retrieval and culture
144
Ovaries were isolated from 3-4 week-old KM mice sacrificed by cervical
145
dislocation after intraperitoneal injection of 5 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin
146
(PMSG) for 48 hours. Cumulus cells were removed by repeatedly pipetting and
147
oocytes were collected in pre-warmed (37°C) M2 medium supplemented with 50 µM
148
IBMX to arrest the oocytes at GV-stage.
149
To resume meiosis, oocytes were washed out of IBMX and released into fresh
150
M2 medium (Sigma) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in air for 0, 2, 8, 9 and 14 h,
151
corresponding to GV stage, germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) stage, metaphase I
152
(MI), anaphase I (AI) and metaphase II (MII), respectively. Oocytes at a specific stage
153
were collected according to the experiment purpose.
154
2.4 Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
155
Oocytes at the specific stage were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4)
7
156
for 30 minutes and permeabilized in 0.5% Triton-X-100 for 30 min at room
157
temperature. And then, oocytes were blocked in PBS containing 2% BSA and 0.05%
158
Tween-20 for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with anti-WDR62 antibody
159
(GeneTex, 1:100), anti-Arp3 antibody (Sigma, 1:100), or anti--phospho-p44/42
160
MAPK antibody (CST, 1:100), at 4 °C overnight. After washing in PBS containing
161
0.05% Tween-20 for 3 times and 10 min each, oocytes were incubated with Cy3-
162
conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Boster; 1:100) or Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse
163
(Boster; 1:100), for 1 h at 37°C. For double staining of spindle or actin, oocytes were
164
stained with anti-α-tubulin-FITC antibody (Sigma, 1:100) or labeled with
165
Phalloidin-FITC (Sigma, 1:100) for 1 h at 37°C. After washing three times, DNA was
166
counterstained with DAPI (1 µg/ml) for 10 min at room temperature. Finally, oocytes
167
were mounted on glass slides with DABCO and examined under a confocal laser
168
scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss 800, Germany). Confocal images were further
169
processed using Zeiss LSM Image Browser software and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe
170
Systems Inc., San Jose, CA). Oocytes were incubated with fluorescence-labeled
171
secondary antibodies as negative control and the primary antibody was replaced by
172
non-immune IgG.
173
2.5 Western blotting
174
Samples containing about 200 oocytes each group were briefly washed in PBS
175
and then lysed in 2 × SDS loading buffer and boiled for 5 min, and then stored at
176
−80°C until use. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrically
177
transferred to PVDF membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore). The membranes were
8
178
washed briefly in TBST and then blocked in TBST containing 5% skim milk at room
179
temperature for 1 h, followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C with WDR62 antibody
180
(GeneTex, 1:1000), Arp3 antibody (Sigma, 1:1000), or phospho-p44/42 MAPK
181
antibody (CST, 1:1000), at 4 °C overnight. After washing 3 times in TBST (10 min
182
each), the membranes were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with HRP conjugates secondary
183
antibodies. Finally, the membranes were washed in TBST and the immunoblot bands
184
were processed with ECL kit and visualized using the chemiluminescence system
185
(Thermo Scientific). β-actin (Santa Cruz, 1:500), α-tubulin (Proteintech, 1:500) and
186
GAPDH (Santa Cruz, 1:500) were served as a loading control. The relative signal
187
intensity was assessed by Image J software (NIH, USA). Blank control oocytes were
188
incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody as negative control and the
189
primary antibody was replaced by non-immune IgG.
190
2.6 Microinjection of Wdr62-targeted short interfering siRNA
191
For WDR62 knockdown, GV-stage oocytes were collected in M2 medium
192
containing 50 µM IBMX. After 1 h recovery 5–10 pL of 40 µM control siRNA
193
(sc-37007; Santa Cruz, CA) or Wdr62 siRNA (siRNAPack1999; Ribobio, Guangzhou,
194
China) was injected into the cytoplasm of oocytes. Following microinjection, the
195
oocytes were arrested at the GV stage in M2 medium containing 50 µM IBMX
196
(Sigma) for 24 h to efficiently achieve WDR62 knockdown. Next, oocytes were
197
directly collected for western blotting or immunostaining or thoroughly washed out of
198
IBMX and released into M16 medium for in vitro meiotic maturation or other
199
experiments.
9
200
2.7 Statistical analysis
201
At least three independent replicates were used for each analysis. Data were
202
presented as mean ± SEM and analyzed by paired-samples t-test using SPSS software
203
(SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) while P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
204
Statistical difference was indicated by different superscripts.
205
3. Results
206
3.1. Subcellular localization and expression of WDR62 during mouse oocyte meiotic
207
maturation
208
To investigate the role of WDR62 in mouse oocyte maturation, we first examined
209
the dynamic distribution and expression of WDR62 at different development stages.
210
Oocytes were cultured in vitro for 0, 2, 8, 9 or 14 h until they reached the GV, GVBD,
211
MI, AI, and MII stages, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1A, WDR62 co-localized with
212
the chromosomes from GV to MII stages. The subcellular localization pattern of
213
WDR62 associated with chromosomes during oocyte meiotic maturation, indicated
214
that WDR62 might be involved in the regulation of meiotic progression in oocytes.
215
Moreover, the relative protein level pattern of WDR62 during oocyte meiotic
216
maturation was examined by Western blotting analysis. The result showed that the
217
expression of WDR62 in oocytes was significantly reduced from GV to MII stage
218
(Figure 1B). Based on these results, we speculated that WDR62 might have a
219
previously unknown function in oocyte meiosis regulation.
220
3.2. Knockdown of WDR62 affects the first polar body extrusion and asymmetric
221
division
10
222
To further explore its function during oocyte maturation, WDR62 was knocked
223
down by microinjection of Wdr62 specific siRNA into GV-stage oocytes and then
224
maintained at the GV stage for 24 h to achieve knockdown efficiency. Compared with
225
oocytes microinjected with control siRNA, Western blot analysis revealed that the
226
expression of WDR62 was significantly reduced in oocytes microinjected with Wdr62
227
siRNA (Figure 2A). After WDR62 knockdown, oocytes were continuously cultured
228
up to 14 h for maturation. After 2 h in culture, we found that knockdown of WDR62
229
had no significant effect on the GVBD rate when compared with that in the control
230
group (83.5 ± 1.6% vs. 91.8 ± 4.2%, P > 0.05, Fig. 2B). However, a high frequency of
231
RNAi oocytes was unable to complete meiosis with no polar bodies or exhibited large
232
polar body extrusion after 14 h in culture (Fig. 2C). Then, we analyzed the rate of the
233
first polar body extrusion and large polar body extrusion in the control group and
234
RNAi group, respectively. The rate of first polar body extrusion (PBE) was
235
significantly reduced in RNAi group (39.3 ± 4.1% vs. 62.3 ± 3.6%, P < 0.05, Fig. 2D).
236
Furthermore, the rate of large polar body extrusion of RNAi oocytes was also
237
significantly higher than that of control group (16.5 ± 1.6% vs. 4.0 ± 0.8%, P < 0.01,
238
Figure 2E). Taken together, these observations suggested that WDR62 had a critical
239
role in oocyte meiotic maturation and asymmetric division.
240
3.3. Knockdown of WDR62 disrupts spindle organization and chromosome
241
alignment during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation
242
Given that WDR62 co-localized with the chromosomes during oocyte meiosis
243
and the proportion of meiotic maturation declined in RNAi oocytes, we analyzed the
11
244
spindle morphology and chromosome alignment in oocytes after WDR62 knockdown.
245
As shown in Fig. 3A, most oocytes had typical barrel-shaped spindles and
246
well-aligned chromosomes on the metaphase plate at MI stage in control group.
247
However, we found a high frequency of spindle organization defects (38.6 ± 4.6% vs.
248
11.4 ± 3.7%, P < 0.01; Figure 3A and B) and chromosome alignment failure (46.3 ±
249
1.0% vs. 13.4 ± 1.2%, P < 0.001; Figure 3A and C) in RNAi oocytes, displaying
250
multipolar spindles with more than two poles, abnormal spindles with pointy poles,
251
distorted spindles with one or several scattered chromosomes. These results suggested
252
that depletion of WDR62 caused defective spindle morphogenesis and abnormal
253
chromosome alignment, which indicated that WDR62 had a critical role in spindle
254
architecture and chromosome alignment.
255
3.4. Knockdown of WDR62 affects spindle migration during mouse oocyte meiotic
256
maturation
257
In mouse oocytes, asymmetric meiotic divisions are driven by the eccentric
258
positioning of the spindle [32]. As the spindle positioning was the key step of the
259
asymmetric division of oocytes [33], we next examined the spindle positioning to
260
explore the reason for the large polar body extrusion after WDR62 knockdown. After
261
culturing for 9 h, the spindle migrated to the oocyte cortex in most control oocytes,
262
while the most spindles failed to migrate to cortex and stayed in the center of RNAi
263
oocytes (Fig. 4A). Moreover, we analyzed the rate of the spindle localization pattern
264
between the control group and RNAi group. The result showed that the rate of cortex
265
located spindle in control group was significantly higher than that of RNAi group
12
266
(74.0 ± 3.0% vs. 42.1 ± 4.3%, P < 0.01; Fig. 4B). While in RNAi oocytes, a higher
267
proportion of spindles anchored to the center of cytoplasm compared with the control
268
oocytes (57.9 ± 4.3% vs. 26.0 ± 4.3%, P < 0.01; Fig. 4B).
269
3.5. Knockdown of WDR62 causes the failure formation of actin cap during mouse
270
oocyte meiotic maturation
271
The formation of actin cap is one of the predominant features of oocyte
272
polarization [34], which is essential for the success of asymmetric division. Therefore,
273
we examined the actin cap formation to investigate the effect of WDR62 on actin
274
polymerization. Oocytes were collected after 8 h, 9 h or 14 h in culture, corresponding
275
to MI, AI and MII stage, respectively. As shown in Fig. 5A, the actin caps were
276
clearly observed on the membrane of control oocytes at these stages (arrowhead),
277
proven by the fluorescence plot profiling. However, in sharp contrast, the clear actin
278
caps were not found in RNAi oocytes. Moreover, the chromosomes localized under
279
the region of the cortex with an actin cap in the control oocytes, while in RNAi
280
oocytes, they segregated centrally with no actin cap. Furthermore, the actin cap
281
formation of oocytes at AI stage was examined by quantitative analysis. The result
282
showed that the proportion of oocytes with actin cap in RNAi oocytes was
283
significantly lower than that in control group (40.2 ± 8.4% vs. 76.7 ± 5.0%, P < 0.001;
284
Figure. 5B).
285
3.6. Knockdown of WDR62 alters the distribution and expression of Arp3
286
It is well known that Arp2/3-dependent actin dynamics are critical to leading edge
287
protrusion in migrating cells [35]. Inhibition of Arp2/3 or its activator N-WASP
13
288
diminished actin cap formation [36]. To explore the reason for the failure of actin cap
289
formation in RNAi oocytes, Arp3 was examined. Significantly, Arp3 accumulated in
290
the cortical region that overlaid the chromosomes, which was coincident with the
291
actin cap in control oocytes, while in shape contrast, polarized Arp3 signals were
292
undetectable in RNAi oocytes (Figure. 6A). Quantitative analysis demonstrated that
293
Arp3 cap formation on cortex was significantly reduced in RNAi oocytes in
294
comparison to control (32.1 ± 1.5% vs. 64.5 ± 4.3%, P < 0.01; Figure. 6B).
295
Furthermore, we revealed Arp3 expression was increased in MI oocytes after WDR62
296
knockdown by Western blot analysis (Fig. 6C).
297
3.7. Knockdown of WDR62 has no effect on the expression of p-MAPK but perturbs
298
its localization
299
It has been reported that active mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is
300
required for cortical reorganization [8]. Furthermore, live cell imaging showed that
301
the spindle forms centrally but does not migrate in Mos –/– oocytes [37], similar to the
302
phenomena observed in the oocytes when WDR62 was abated. To inspect the activity
303
of p-MAPK, the control and RNAi oocytes were cultured in vitro for 8.5 h until they
304
reached the post-MI stage for western blot and immunofluorescent staining to
305
determine the expression and localization, respectively. As shown in Fig. 7A,
306
p-MAPK was localized at the spindle poles in control oocyte, while the distribution of
307
p-MAPK in RNAi oocyte was dispersed with separated chromosomes in the center of
308
cytoplasm, which was coincided with the observed aberrant spindle morphogenesis in
309
WDR62-depleted oocytes. However, the expression of p-MAPK was not affected
14
310
after WDR62 knockdown (Figure. 7B). Therefore, we found that WDR62 participated
311
in actin filament-mediated spindle migration during meiotic asymmetric division
312
(Figure. 8) independent from the MAPK pathway.
313 314
4. Discussion
315
Among extensively expressed MCPH proteins, which have a centrosomal
316
association related to part of cell cycle [38], WDR62 expresses in cytoplasm during
317
interphase and localizes to the spindle pole in mitosis, showing strikingly cell
318
cycle-dependent localization [39], whereas the cells with mutants of WDR62 lose the
319
ability to restrict WDR62 localization to the mitotic spindle during cell division [24].
320
Moreover, several studies have proposed that that WDR62 has varieties of functions
321
in mitotic cells, especially in maintaining the integrity of centriole [40-42], while
322
WDR62 depletion can cause mitotic delay with compromised centrosomal integrity
323
and spindle abnormality. However, little is known regarding the regulation of WDR62
324
in mouse oocyte which is absent in typical centrosomes.
325
In this study, we discovered that WDR62 appeared to be co-localized with the
326
chromosomes during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation, and disruption of PBE was
327
observed with specific depletion of WDR62 in oocytes, moreover, a certain
328
percentage of MII oocytes with large polar body were observed. To investigate the
329
reason for decline in PBE rate, we examined the spindle assembly after WDR62
330
knockdown. As expected, the abnormal spindle morphogenesis accompanied with
331
defective chromosome alignment was observed through immunofluorescent analysis.
15
332
Furthermore, observation of RNAi treated oocyte revealed that oocyte division to
333
generate two MII oocytes was symmetric, resulted oocytes were of similar size
334
instead of a large oocyte with small polar body.
335
Asymmetric division is dependent on spindle migration mediated by actin, and
336
dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton organization regulate the oocyte meiotic
337
maturation [33]. Likewise, we found that the spindle migration and subsequent
338
cortical reorganization were disturbed and characterized by an arrested spindle in the
339
central cytoplasm, and a loss of actin cap in mouse oocyte with WDR62 knockdown.
340
These findings suggests WDR62 might regulate actin filaments for spindle
341
positioning, as actin filaments are the main power for spindle movement in
342
mammalian oocyte [43]. The Arp2/3 complex is verified to be involved in multiple
343
processes during mouse oocyte maturation. Disrupting the function of Arp2/3 by
344
RNAi or specific inhibitor could interfere, not only with the spindle migration but also
345
the cortical reorganization [44]. Furthermore, published data has validated that Arp2/3
346
complex which localizes to the cortical cap is important for maintaining asymmetric
347
meiotic spindle migration by generating an actin polymerization-driven cytoplasmic
348
streaming [36]. Inline to these studies, we observed that the localization pattern of the
349
Arp2/3 complex was disconcerted after WDR62 knockdown, which should be
350
responsible for the disruption of actin polymerization in cortical region.
351
Previous studies have shown that the Mos/MAPK pathway regulates oocyte
352
asymmetric division. The establishment of cortical polarity is critical for asymmetric
353
meiotic cell division, and the subcortically positioned chromatin induces cortical
16
354
reorganization in a MOS-dependent manner [45]. During the polar body extrusion in
355
starfish oocytes, MAPK is required for spindle attachment to the cortex and the
356
formation of cleavage furrow [46]. Moreover, in the oocytes, microinjected of Arf1
357
dominant-negative mutant, the meiotic spindles do not position at the cortex during
358
meiosis I stage and result in extrusion of large polar bodies, supposed to be regulated
359
by decline in expression of p-MAPK [47]. The C-terminal region of WDR62 contains
360
serine/threonine phosphorylation motifs, which interact with proline-directed kinases
361
such as MAPKs and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) [48]. WDR62 specifically
362
binds components of the JNK pathway to potentiate stress-stimulated signal
363
transduction [23] and interacts with MKK7 (MAPK kinase 7) via direct
364
protein-protein interactions in somatic cells [49, 50]. Therefore, we speculated that the
365
formation of large polar body in WDR62-depleted oocytes might be connected with
366
the MAPK pathway. To confirm our hypothesis, the localization and expression of
367
p-MAPK in anaphase oocytes were examined. Nonetheless, our results showed that
368
the activation of MAPK was not perturbed, whereas the localization was disrupted
369
following WDR62 knockdown, which strengthen our finding that knockdown of
370
WDR62 induced abnormal spindle microtubule organization. Hence we verified that
371
WDR62 is involved in the regulation of asymmetric cell division independent of
372
MAPK pathway.
373
WDR62 contains WD40 repeat (WDR) domain, which is a typically seven bladed
374
β-propeller domain of donut shape [51]. As one of the most abundant and interacting
375
domains in the eukaryotic genome[52], WDR domains typically serve as interaction
17
376
platforms for multiple proteins, and let them ideally fit into the cellular interaction
377
networks [53]. Some studies have revealed that WDR62 can scaffold kinases that are
378
important mitotic regulators such as JNK and AURKA (Aurora kinase A) in somatic
379
cells [54]. Thus WDR62 may serves as a scaffold protein to orchestrate specific
380
transmission of signaling. Recently, to explain the mechanism underlying spindle
381
migration, a model posits that MI spindle migration is biphasic. This model has
382
indicated that following Fmn2-mediated initial movement, the spindle experiences a
383
fast phase of migration via cortical Arp2/3-orchestrated cytoplasmic streaming [1]. In
384
this model, asymmetry breaking and polarity maintenance depend on a positive
385
feedback loop between cortical polarization and asymmetric spindle movement,
386
which contact these two well-known characteristics of oocyte maturation. When the
387
chromosomes migrate to the vicinity of cortex within a distance the chromatin signal
388
transmitted by Ran guanosine triphosphate (RanGTP) gradient stimulates the polarized
389
accumulation of the cortical N-WASP-Arp2/3 machinery to nucleate actin
390
polymerization [32], thereby driving the formation of the polarized actin cap and
391
promoting cytoplasmic streaming to maintain spindle positioning [55]. Furthermore,
392
the subcortically positioned chromatin or DNA-coated beads can induce the
393
establishment of cortical polarity and assembly of a myosin II-based ring, and the Ran
394
GTPase plays a critical role in this process [56]. Similar to the localization of RCC1,
395
the exchange factor of the RanGTP gradient, WDR62 co-localized with the
396
chromosome. Based on the localization of WDR62 during mouse oocyte maturation
397
and the larger polar body extrusion when WDR62 abated, we hypothesized that
18
398
WDR62 might cooperate with RCC1 to participate in transmitting chromosome signal,
399
for accumulating cortical Arp2/3 complex to regulate actin nucleation during meiotic
400
asymmetric division. Therefore, when the expression of WDR62 declined, the
401
activation of RCC1 would be increased for compensation, so that the expression of
402
Arp2/3 complex was increased as shown in Figure 6C. However, Arp2/3 complex was
403
not the direct downstream of RCC1, thus when the transmission of chromosome
404
signal was affected after WDR62 knockdown, its localization would be affected.
405
However, this hypothesis required further verification.
406
In conclusion, our results demonstrated a novel function of WDR62 in spindle
407
migration and asymmetric cytokinesis during mouse oocyte maturation. However, it
408
remains unclear what role WDR62 has in the transmission of chromatin signal during
409
polar body extrusion, and warranted further investigations.
410
Author Contributions
411
Y.S.W. and L.J.H. conceived and designed experiments; Y.S.W and X.F.J.
412
performed experiments; F.C, D.W, Z.M.D. and Y.L.M provided new tools and
413
reagents; Y.S.W. and L.J.H. wrote the manuscript; L.J.H. made manuscript revisions.
414
Funding
415
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program
416
(2017YFD0501701), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant#
417
2018CFA015) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
418
(Program No. 2662018PY037).
419
Conflicts of interest Statement
19
420
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial
421
or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
422
References
423
[1]
K. Yi, B. Rubinstein, J.R. Unruh, F. Guo, B.D. Slaughter, R. Li, Sequential
424
actin-based pushing forces drive meiosis I chromosome migration and
425
symmetry breaking in oocytes, The Journal of cell biology 200 (2013)
426
567-576.
427
[2]
I. Bennabi, M.E. Terret, M.H. Verlhac, Meiotic spindle assembly and
428
chromosome segregation in oocytes, Journal Of Cell Biology 215 (2016)
429
611-619.
430
[3]
and Mitosis, Current Biology 21 (2011) R825-R830.
431 432
C.M. Field, P. Lenart, Bulk Cytoplasmic Actin and Its Functions in Meiosis
[4]
J. Azoury, K.W. Lee, V. Georget, P. Rassinier, B. Leader, M.H. Verlhac,
433
Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes Relies on a Dynamic Meshwork of
434
Actin Filaments, Current Biology 18 (2008) 1514-1519.
435
[5]
assembly in human oocytes, Nat Commun 10 (2019) 4651.
436 437
[6]
M. Almonacid, M.E. Terret, M.H. Verlhac, Actin-based spindle positioning: new insights from female gametes, J Cell Sci 127 (2014) 477-483.
438 439
J. Roeles, G. Tsiavaliaris, Actin-microtubule interplay coordinates spindle
[7]
X. Duan, H.L. Zhang, M.H. Pan, Y. Zhang, S.C. Sun, Vesicular transport
440
protein Arf6 modulates cytoskeleton dynamics for polar body extrusion in
441
mouse oocyte meiosis, Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 1865 (2018) 455.
20
442
[8]
during oocyte maturation and fertilization, Reproduction 131 (2006) 193-205.
443 444
Q.Y. Sun, H. Schatten, Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments
[9]
F. Wang, L. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, Z.B. Wang, X.S. Cui, N.H. Kim, S.C. Sun,
445
WASH complex regulates Arp2/3 complex for actin-based polar body
446
extrusion in mouse oocytes, Scientific Reports 4 (2014).
447
[10]
J. Dumont, K. Million, K. Sunderland, P. Rassinier, H. Lim, B. Leader, M.H.
448
Verlhac, Formin-2 is required for spindle migration and for the late steps of
449
cytokinesis in mouse oocytes, Dev Biol 301 (2007) 254-265.
450
[11]
S. Pfender, V. Kuznetsov, S. Pleiser, E. Kerkhoff, M. Schuh, Spire-Type Actin
451
Nucleators Cooperate with Formin-2 to Drive Asymmetric Oocyte Division,
452
Current Biology 21 (2011) 955-960.
453
[12]
T.S. Choi, K. Fukasawa, R.P. Zhou, L. Tessarollo, K. Borror, J. Resau, G.F.
454
VandeWoude, The Mos/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway
455
regulates the size and degradation of the first polar body in maturing mouse
456
oocytes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
457
States of America 93 (1996) 7032-7035.
458
[13]
Cilium Biogenesis, Annu Rev Biochem 88 (2019) 691-724.
459 460
[14]
463
P. Gonczy, Towards a molecular architecture of centriole assembly, Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 13 (2012) 425-435.
461 462
D.K. Breslow, A.J. Holland, Mechanism and Regulation of Centriole and
[15]
M. Bornens, The Centrosome in Cells and Organisms, Science 335 (2012) 422-426.
21
464
[16]
Nat Rev Cancer 15 (2015) 639-652.
465 466
[17]
[18]
[19]
T. Müller-Reichert, G. Greenan, E. O’Toole, M. Srayko, The elegans of spindle assembly, Cellular & Molecular Life Sciences Cmls 67 (2010) 2195-2213.
471 472
D. Julien, D. Arshad, Acentrosomal spindle assembly and chromosome segregation during oocyte meiosis, Trends in Cell Biology 22 (2012) 241-249.
469 470
E.A. Nigg, J.W. Raff, Centrioles, Centrosomes, and Cilia in Health and Disease, Cell 139 (2009) 663-678.
467 468
P. Gonczy, Centrosomes and cancer: revisiting a long-standing relationship,
[20]
K. Howe, G. FitzHarris, Recent Insights into Spindle Function in Mammalian
473
Oocytes and Early Embryos1, Biology of Reproduction 89 (2013) 71,
474
71-79-71, 71-79.
475
[21]
Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7 (2015).
476 477
O. Hiroyuki, Meiosis: an overview of key differences from mitosis, Cold
[22]
M. Schuh, J. Ellenberg, Self-organization of MTOCs replaces Centrosome
478
Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes, Cell
479
130 (2007) 484-498.
480
[23]
M.A. Bogoyevitch, Y.Y.C. Yeap, Z. Qu, K.R. Ngoei, Y.Y. Yip, T.T. Zhao, J.I.
481
Heng, D.C.H. Ng, WD40-repeat protein 62 is a JNK-phosphorylated spindle
482
pole protein required for spindle maintenance and timely mitotic progression,
483
Journal of Cell Science (2012).
484 485
[24]
A.K. Nicholas, K. Maryam, D. Julie, O.P. Carvalho, J.J. Cox, T. Gemma, K. Rizwana, A. Muhammad, A. Wasim, V. Alain, WDR62 is associated with the
22
486
spindle pole and is mutated in human microcephaly, Nature Genetics 42
487
(2010) 1010.
488
[25]
M.C. Manzini, C.A. Walsh, What disorders of cortical development tell us
489
about the cortex: one plus one does not always make two, Current Opinion in
490
Genetics & Development 21 (2011) 333-339.
491
[26]
centriole formation, Current Biology 16 (2006) 1844-1849.
492 493
[27]
P. Strnad, P. Gönczy, Mechanisms of procentriole formation, Trends in Cell Biology 18 (2008) 389-396.
494 495
D. Marie, C. Coralie, G.N. Pierre, Sequential protein recruitment in C. elegans
[28]
T.L. Megraw, J.T. Sharkey, R.S. Nowakowski, Cdk5rap2 exposes the
496
centrosomal root of microcephaly syndromes, Trends in Cell Biology 21
497
(2011) 470-480.
498
[29]
A. Kodani, T.W. Yu, J.R. Johnson, D. Jayaraman, T.L. Johnson, L. Al-Gazali,
499
L. Sztriha, J.N. Partlow, H. Kim, A.L. Krup, Centriolar satellites assemble
500
centrosomal microcephaly proteins to recruit CDK2 and promote centriole
501
duplication, eLife,4,(2015-08-21) 4 (2015).
502
[30]
J.F. Chen, Z. Ying, J. Wilde, K. Hansen, L. Fan, L. Niswander, Microcephaly
503
Disease Gene Wdr62 Regulates Mitotic Progression of Embryonic Neural
504
Stem Cells and Brain Size, Nature Communications 5 (2014) 3885-3885.
505
[31]
D. Xu, F. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Sun, Z. Xu, Microcephaly-Associated Protein
506
WDR62 Regulates Neurogenesis through JNK1 in the Developing Neocortex,
507
Cell Reports 6 (2014) 1176-1177.
23
508
[32]
ERM (Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin) inactivation, Cell Cycle 12 (2013) 1672-1678.
509 510
B. Dehapiot, G. Halet, Ran GTPase promotes oocyte polarization by regulating
[33]
M.H. Pan, F. Wang, Y. Lu, F. Tang, X. Duan, Y. Zhang, B. Xiong, S.C. Sun,
511
FHOD1 regulates cytoplasmic actin-based spindle migration for mouse oocyte
512
asymmetric cell division, Journal of Cellular Physiology 233 (2018).
513
[34]
X. Liu, X. Li, R. Ma, B. Xiong, S.C. Sun, H. Liu, L. Gu, Tristetraprolin
514
functions in cytoskeletal organization during mouse oocyte maturation,
515
Oncotarget 7 (2016) 53330-53338.
516
[35]
Science 326 (2009) 1208-1212.
517 518
T.D. Pollard, J.A. Cooper, Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement,
[36]
K. Yi, J.R. Unruh, M.Q. Deng, B.D. Slaughter, B. Rubinstein, R. Li, Dynamic
519
maintenance
520
Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes, Nature Cell
521
Biology 13 (2011) 1252-U1186.
522
[37]
of
asymmetric
meiotic
spindle
position
through
M.H. Verlhac, C. Lefebvre, P. Guillaud, P. Rassinier, B. Maro, Asymmetric
523
division in mouse oocytes: with or without Mos, Current Biology 10 (2000)
524
1303-1306.
525
[38]
Rome?, Trends Genet 25 (2009) 501-510.
526 527
G.K. Thornton, C.G. Woods, Primary microcephaly: do all roads lead to
[39]
T.W. Yu, G.H. Mochida, D.J. Tischfield, S.K. Sgaier, L. Flores-Sarnat, C.M.
528
Sergi, M. Topcu, M.T. McDonald, B.J. Barry, J.M. Felie, C. Sunu, W.B.
529
Dobyns, R.D. Folkerth, A.J. Barkovich, C.A. Walsh, Mutations in WDR62,
24
530
encoding a centrosome-associated protein, cause microcephaly with simplified
531
gyri and abnormal cortical architecture, Nature Genetics 42 (2010)
532
1015-U1145.
533
[40]
H.G. Farag, S. Froehler, K. Oexle, E. Ravindran, D. Schindler, T. Staab, A.
534
Huebner, N. Kraemer, W. Chen, A.M. Kaindl, Abnormal centrosome and
535
spindle morphology in a patient with autosomal recessive primary
536
microcephaly type 2 due to compound heterozygous WDR62 gene mutation,
537
Orphanet journal of rare diseases 8 (2013) 178.
538
[41]
A. Kodani, T.W. Yu, J.R. Johnson, D. Jayaraman, T.L. Johnson, L. Al-Gazali,
539
L. Sztriha, J.N. Partlow, H. Kim, A.L. Krup, A. Dammermann, N.J. Krogan,
540
C.A. Walsh, J.F. Reiter, Centriolar satellites assemble centrosomal
541
microcephaly proteins to recruit CDK2 and promote centriole duplication,
542
eLife 4 (2015).
543
[42]
P. Sgourdou, K. Mishra-Gorur, I. Saotome, O. Henagariu, B. Tuysuz, C.
544
Campos, K. Ishigame, K. Giannikou, J.L. Quon, N. Sestan, A.O. Caglayan, M.
545
Gunel, A. Louvi, Disruptions in asymmetric centrosome inheritance and
546
WDR62-Aurora kinase B interactions in primary microcephaly, Sci Rep 7
547
(2017) 43708.
548
[43]
during mouse oocyte maturation, Cytoskeleton 69 (2012) 727-737.
549 550 551
K. Yi, R. Li, Actin cytoskeleton in cell polarity and asymmetric division
[44]
S.C. Sun, Z.B. Wang, Y.N. Xu, S.E. Lee, X.S. Cui, N.H. Kim, Arp2/3 complex regulates asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes, PloS one 6
25
(2011) e18392.
552 553
[45]
M.Q. Deng, H. Kishikawa, R. Yanagimachi, G.S. Kopf, R.M. Schultz, C.J.
554
Williams, Chromatin-mediated cortical granule redistribution is responsible
555
for the formation of the cortical granule-free domain in mouse eggs, Dev Biol
556
257 (2003) 166-176.
557
[46]
H. Ucar, K. Tachibana, T. Kishimoto, The Mos-MAPK pathway regulates
558
Diaphanous-related formin activity to drive cleavage furrow closure during
559
polar body extrusion in starfish oocytes, Journal Of Cell Science 126 (2013)
560
5153-5165.
561
[47]
S.F. Wang, J.J. Hu, X.Z. Guo, J.X. Liu, S.R. Gao, ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1
562
Regulates Asymmetric Cell Division in Female Meiosis in the Mouse, Biology
563
Of Reproduction 80 (2009) 555-562.
564
[48]
N.R. Lim, Y.Y.C. Yeap, T.T. Zhao, Y.Y. Yip, S.C. Wong, D. Xu, C.S. Ang, N.A.
565
Williamson, Z.H. Xu, M.A. Bogoyevitch, D.C.H. Ng, Opposing roles for JNK
566
and Aurora A in regulating the association of WDR62 with spindle
567
microtubules, Journal Of Cell Science 128 (2015) 527-540.
568
[49]
K. Cohen-Katsenelson, T. Wasserman, S. Khateb, A.J. Whitmarsht, A.
569
Aronheim, Docking interactions of the JNK scaffold protein WDR62,
570
Biochem J 439 (2011) 381-390.
571
[50]
T. Wasserman, K. Katsenelson, S. Daniliuc, T. Hasin, M. Choder, A.
572
Aronheim, A Novel c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK)-binding Protein WDR62
573
Is Recruited to Stress Granules and Mediates a Nonclassical JNK Activation,
26
Mol Biol Cell 21 (2010) 117-130.
574 575
[51]
M. Schapira, M. Tyers, M. Torrent, C.H. Arrowsmith, WD40 repeat domain
576
proteins: a novel target class?, Nature reviews. Drug discovery 16 (2017)
577
773-786.
578
[52]
Functions, The protein journal 37 (2018) 391-406.
579 580
[53]
C.U. Stirnimann, E. Petsalaki, R.B. Russell, C.W. Muller, WD40 proteins propel cellular networks, Trends in biochemical sciences 35 (2010) 565-574.
581 582
B.P. Jain, S. Pandey, WD40 Repeat Proteins: Signalling Scaffold with Diverse
[54]
N.R. Lim, B. Shohayeb, O. Zaytseva, N. Mitchell, S.S. Millard, D.C.H. Ng,
583
L.M. Quinn, Glial-Specific Functions of Microcephaly Protein WDR62 and
584
Interaction with the Mitotic Kinase AURKA Are Essential for Drosophila
585
Brain Growth, Stem Cell Rep 9 (2017) 32-41.
586
[55]
during mouse oocyte maturation, Philos T R Soc B 368 (2013).
587 588
K.X. Yi, B. Rubinstein, R. Li, Symmetry breaking and polarity establishment
[56]
M.Q. Deng, P. Suraneni, R.M. Schultz, R. Li, The ran GTPase mediates
589
chromatin signaling to control cortical polarity during polar body extrusion in
590
mouse oocytes, Developmental Cell 12 (2007) 301-308.
591 592 593 594 595
27
Figure legends
596 597
Figure 1
Subcellular localization and expression pattern of WDR62 during
598
mouse oocyte maturation. (A) Subcellular localization of WDR62 detected by
599
immunofluorescent staining. Oocytes at indicated stages were immunostained for
600
WDR62 (red), microtubule (α-tubulin; green) and DNA (blue). Scale bar, 20 µm. (B)
601
Expression pattern of WDR62 during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Oocytes were
602
collected after 0, 2, 8 or 14 h in culture, corresponding to GV, GVBD, MI and MII
603
stage, respectively. The molecular weight of WDR62 and β -actin was 167 kD and 43
604
kD respectively. Normalized signal intensity of WDR62 was presented. Data were
605
presented as mean percentage (mean ± SEM) of at least three independent
606
experiments. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
607
Figure 2: Knockdown of WDR62 affects the first polar body extrusion and
608
asymmetric division. Live GV-stage oocytes microinjected with control or Wdr62
609
siRNA were incubated in M2 medium containing 50 µM IBMX for 24 h and then
610
released into IBMX-free M16 medium for in vitro maturation. (A) Knockdown of
611
endogenous WDR62 expression after Wdr62-siRNA injection was verified by Western
612
blot analysis with α-tubulin as a loading control. Band intensity was measured by
613
Image J software. (B) Rate of GVBD in control and RNAi oocytes subsequently
614
continuously observed at 2 h. (C) Representative images of polar body in control and
615
RNAi oocytes. (D) Rate of polar body extrusion (PBE) in control and RNAi oocytes
616
after 14 culture. (E) Rate of the large polar body extrusion in control and RNAi
617
oocytes after 14 culture. A total of 146 oocytes in control group and 144 oocytes in
28
618
RNAi group were analyzed. Data were presented as mean percentage (mean ± SEM)
619
of at least three independent experiments. NS, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
620
and ***P < 0.001.
621
Figure 3: Effects of WDR62 knockdown on spindle organization and
622
chromosome alignment in oocyte. (A) Oocytes at metaphase I stage were stained
623
with anti-tubulin antibody to visualize spindle (green) and counterstained with DAPI
624
to visualize chromosomes (blue). Representative confocal images from control and
625
RNAi oocytes were shown. The control oocyte exhibited typical barrel-shaped spindle
626
and well-aligned chromosomes on the metaphase plate. Spindle defects and
627
chromosomes misalignment were frequently observed in RNAi oocytes. Scale bar, 20
628
µm. (B and C) Rate of aberrant spindle and misaligned chromosome in control (n =
629
80) and RNAi (n = 82) oocytes. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 and
630
***P < 0.001.
631
Figure 4: Knockdown of WDR62 affects spindle migration in oocyte meiosis. (A)
632
After culturing for 9 h, oocytes were stained with anti-tubulin antibody to visualize
633
spindle (green) and counterstained with DAPI to visualize chromosomes (blue). The
634
spindle formed in the central cytoplasm and migrated to oocyte cortex in control
635
oocytes. However, the spindle was still in the central cytoplasm in RNAi oocytes.
636
Scale bar, 20 µm. (B) Quantitative analysis of spindle position (center and cortex) in
637
control (n = 86) and RNAi (n = 78) oocytes. Data were presented as mean ± SEM.
638
**P < 0.01.
639
Figure 5: Knockdown of WDR62 disturbs the formation of actin cap during
29
640
oocyte maturation. MI, AI and MII oocytes were labeled with phalloidin to visualize
641
actin (green) and were counterstained with DAPI for chromosomes (blue). (A)
642
Representative confocal images showed actin distribution in control and RNAi
643
oocytes. Arrows indicated the position of actin cap in control oocytes. Scale bar, 20
644
µm. (B) Quantitative analysis of the proportion of actin cap formation in control (n =
645
83) and RNAi (n = 77) oocytes at anaphase I stage. Data were presented as mean ±
646
SEM. *P < 0.05.
647
Figure 6: Effects of WDR62 knockdown on the localization and expression of
648
Arp3 in oocyte. (A) Representative images showed the distribution of Arp3 in control
649
and RNAi oocytes. Oocytes cultured for 9 hours were immunostained for Arp3 (red),
650
actin (green) and DNA (blue). The arrow indicated the polarized distribution and the
651
asterisk indicated the position of actin cap in control oocytes. Scale bar, 20 µm. (B)
652
Quantitative analysis of control (n = 51) and RNAi (n = 46) oocytes with polarized
653
distribution of Arp3. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01. (C) The Arp3
654
expression was increased in RNAi oocytes. Band intensity analysis also showed that
655
Arp3 expression was increased compared with that of control. *P < 0.05.
656
Figure 7: Effects of WDR62 knockdown on p-MAPK in oocyte.
657
Representative images showed the distribution of p-MAPK in control and RNAi
658
oocytes. Oocytes at post-MI stage were immunostained for p-MAPK (red), actin
659
(green) and DNA (blue). Scale bar, 20 µm. (B) Expression of p-MAPK in control and
660
RNAi oocytes.
661
Figure 8: A diagram of WDR62 functions in spindle migration during mouse
30
(A)
662
oocyte maturation. The Arp2/3 complex which localizes to the cortical cap in a
663
RanGTP gradient - dependent manner regulates meiotic spindle migration by generating
664
an actin polymerization-driven cytoplamic streaming during meiotic asymmetric
665
division [1], and WDR62 may participate in chromatin signal transmission for Arp2/3
666
activation or localization by cooperating with RCC1 to regulate the RanGTP gradient.
667 668 669 670 671
31
Highlights •
WDR62 depletion compromised the first polar body extrusion and asymmetric division in mouse oocytes.
•
WDR62 knockdown disrupted spindle organization and chromosome alignment in mouse oocytes.
•
WDR62 participated in regulating meiotic spindle migration in mouse oocytes.
•
WDR62 participated in regulating the distribution of cortical actin and Arp2/3 complex in mouse oocytes.
Author Contributions Y.S.W. and L.J.H. conceived and designed experiments; Y.S.W and X.F.J. performed experiments; F.C, D.W, Z.M.D. and Y.L.M provided new tools and reagents; Y.S.W. and L.J.H. wrote the manuscript; L.J.H. made manuscript revisions.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.