When Is It Safe for Patients to Drive After Right Total Knee Arthroplasty?

When Is It Safe for Patients to Drive After Right Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Accepted Manuscript When is it Safe for Patients to Drive after Right Total Knee Arthroplasty? Victor H. Hernandez, MD, MS, Alvin Ong, MD, Fabio Orozc...

810KB Sizes 3 Downloads 68 Views

Accepted Manuscript When is it Safe for Patients to Drive after Right Total Knee Arthroplasty? Victor H. Hernandez, MD, MS, Alvin Ong, MD, Fabio Orozco, MD, Anne Marie Madden, Zachary Post, MD PII:

S0883-5403(16)30126-7

DOI:

10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.027

Reference:

YARTH 55153

To appear in:

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Received Date: 8 January 2016 Revised Date:

11 April 2016

Accepted Date: 21 April 2016

Please cite this article as: Hernandez VH, Ong A, Orozco F, Madden AM, Post Z, When is it Safe for Patients to Drive after Right Total Knee Arthroplasty?, The Journal of Arthroplasty (2016), doi: 10.1016/ j.arth.2016.04.027. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

When is it Safe for Patients to Drive after Right Total Knee Arthroplasty? Victor H Hernandez, MD,MS**; Alvin Ong, MD*; Fabio Orozco, MD*; Anne Marie

SC

RI PT

Madden *; Zachary Post, MD*

**University of Miami- Miller School of Medicine. Orthopaedics. 1400 NW 12th

M AN U

Ave. Suite 4036, Miami, FL 33136

* Rothman Institute, 2500 English Creek Avenue, Building 1300, Egg Harbor

EP

Corresponding Author:

TE D

Township, NJ 08234

Victor Hugo Hernandez, MD,MS.

AC C

Assistant Professor – Orthopedics University of Miami – Miller School of Medicine 1400 NW 12th Avenue – Suite #4036 Miami, FL. 33136

Phone (305) 689-5195 Fax (305) 689-3928 [email protected]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

When is it Safe for Patients to Drive after Right Total Knee Arthroplasty?

2

Abstract.

3

Introduction:

4 5 6 7 8

Advances in surgical technique and pain management have changed TKA. How soon after TKA are patients able to return to driving is a common question. Most surgeons prescribe 6 to 8 weeks post-op based on old literature. Our hypothesis is that patient who undergoes TKA with contemporary techniques will return to their baseline before the 6th post-operative week.

9

Methods

SC

RI PT

1

After IRB approval, 50 patients with right TKA were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a preoperative Brake Reaction Time (BRT), 2, 4 and 6 weeks post-op. At each testing we ask them if they felt that they were ready to drive.

13

Results

14 15 16 17

47 patients completed the study protocol. Mean pre-op BRT was 0.692 seconds. At 2weeks post-op, the BRT was 0.631 seconds. 39 (80%) reached their baseline by 2 weeks and the remaining 10 (20%) reached it at the 4-week post-op. Confounding variables revealed no differences between groups.

18 19 20

From the group that returned to baseline at 2 weeks, 67 % patients stated they felt they were ready to drive, 21 % patients said they weren’t sure and 12 % patients stated they were not ready to drive.

21

Conclusion

22 23 24 25

BRT returned to baseline in the majority of patients by the 2nd week post-op and in all patients by the 4th week. Patient perception of driving ability can predict return of BRT. These findings have allowed us to encourage patients to re-evaluate their driving ability between the 2nd to 4th post-op weeks after TKA.

TE D

EP

AC C

26

M AN U

10 11 12

27

Keywords:

28

Recovery, Total knee Arthroplasty, Total Knee Replacement, Driving, Outcomes.

29 30

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Introduction:

32

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a common procedure for patients with advanced

33

arthritis. Improvements in surgical technique and pain management protocols have

34

accelerated recovery and changed patient expectations. [1,15,16] A common question

35

involves how soon patients are able to return to driving, secondary to the patient’s need to

36

return to activities of daily living and independence. Most surgeons recommend driving

37

between the 6th to 8th weeks post-surgery based on studies previously published over a

38

decade ago [2,3], There is new literature that shows that using minimal invasive

39

techniques and new protocols the waiting time has decrease (4 weeks), but these studies

40

lack of statistical power to drive conclusions [12,13,14]. This question is important

41

because the ability to return to safe driving implies recovery and mobility, and has

42

significant social and economic impact for patients and society. Our group has previously

43

published results on return to safe driving after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). [11] Our

44

study showed that patients returned to driving faster than in previous studies.

45

Historically, TKA publications demonstrated great variability in return to driving.

46

Spalding et al. demonstrated that the Brake Reaction Time (BRT) returned to baseline 8

47

weeks after surgery for the right knee. [2] Pierson showed in a study done almost 10

48

years later, that most patients improved their BRT at 6 weeks post-op. [3] Both of these

49

studies were performed more than a decade ago. Since then, TKA has seen improvements

50

in surgical techniques, as well as pre and post-operative care, and recent studies has

51

demonstrated a faster recovery of BRT at 4 weeks [12,13,14]. The purpose of our study

52

is to prospectively evaluate the BRT after TKA. Our hypothesis is that patients who

53

undergo TKA with contemporary techniques will return to their baseline sooner than

54

previously reported.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

31

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

55 Methods and Material

57

After IRB approval, 50 patients who were scheduled for, and underwent, right TKA were

58

prospectively evaluated between July and October 2014 at our institution. Driving

59

performance was evaluated using the BRT, which measured brake time after a stimulus.

60

BRT is the sum of the reaction time that it takes for a driver to perceive a sensory

61

stimulus, move the right foot from accelerator pedal to the brake pedal, and the time that

62

it takes to apply sufficient pressure to brake (initiate a stop of the vehicle). All patients

63

underwent a preoperative assessment to establish a baseline of their BRT. Then, all

64

patients underwent a right TKA using the mid-vastus approach. All patients were treated

65

with the same postoperative pain and rehabilitation protocols and received identical

66

follow-up. Preoperative medical evaluation was done to diminish the risks of

67

postoperative delirium, urinary retention, and pulmonary and cardiac complications. All

68

patients were managed with spinal anesthesia, a program of multimodal pain

69

management (including minimal use of narcotics) and a rapid mobilization physical

70

therapy protocol. Aspirin was used for DVT prophylaxis and early discharge was utilized

71

whenever possible.

72

Patient demographics were recorded including: age, gender, BMI, and co-morbid

73

conditions. A history was obtained to rule out the use of pre-operative and post-operative

74

narcotics at the time of testing. Patients were then re-tested at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks post-

75

operatively, or until their BRT was equal to or less than their pre-operative score.

76

Furthermore, all patients received a questionnaire at each follow-up visit with the

77

following statement, “Based on my reaction time, I think I am ready to drive”, from this

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

56

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

78

statement patients selected from the following answers: (1) Yes, (2) No. (3) I don’t know.

79

Patients were allowed to drive when the post-operative reaction time was equal to or less

80

than their pre-operative brake reaction time baseline.

RI PT

81 Model/Testing Equipment

83

The RT-2S brake reaction timer (Advanced Therapy Products, Inc. Richmond, VA) was used

84

for our study. (Figure 1) The RT-2S is a lightweight and portable brake reaction time

85

simulator that assists driving evaluators in assessing driving safety. Parnell et al have

86

previously validated the RT-2S.[10] The BRT has been previously described. [11]

87

All patients followed a standardized procedure that consisted of sitting in a chair

88

(adjusted individually for each patient) at a desk with the foot pedal on the ground in

89

front of his/her right foot, and the light box in front of the patients within a viewing

90

distance on the desk.

91

Patients were instructed to place their right foot on the accelerator pedal and keep it

92

depressed to maintain the illumination of the green lamp.

93

instructed to move their right foot from the accelerator pedal to the brake pedal and

94

depress the brake pedal as rapidly as possible when the red lamp on the test light box

95

illuminated. We randomly controlled timing between the illumination of the red and

96

green lamps for two, three, or four seconds. During testing, each subject was given one

97

practice test and three trial times that were collected for data analysis.

99

M AN U

TE D

EP

The patients were then

AC C

98

SC

82

Statistical analysis

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The SPSS 21 (IBM; Armonk, NY) was used to analyze the data. General linear repeated

101

measurement was used for analysis. A difference of p<0.05 was considered significant.

102

Power Analysis.

103

A power analysis was performed to calculate the number of individuals needed. The

104

nationally recommended safe brake time standard is 1.25 seconds which is based upon

105

several scientific studies looking at BRT in all types of patients, surgical and non-surgical

106

alike.[7,4] The normal brake time was estimated to be 1 sec. A Bonferroni correction

107

(i.e., alpha = 0.05) was used for the power analysis. In order to detect a 20% increase in

108

braking time (1,200 sec), with a standard deviation of 0.250 sec, thirty-five patients were

109

needed to obtain a power of 0.8.

110

Results

111

From the total group of 50 patients, two patients were unable to participate in the

112

postoperative evaluation due to the continued use of narcotics at the time of testing.

113

Another patient declined to be tested post operatively and was excluded from the study.

114

A total of 47 patients completed the study, study patients had a mean age of 67.5 Y/O +/-

115

10 SD, the mean BMI was 32.59 SD +/- 7, and 61.7 % were females. The mean pre-op

116

reaction time was 0.692 +/-0.15 sec SD (Range: 0.510 to 1.1 sec). The mean 2-week

117

reaction time was 0.631 sec +/- 0.16 sec SD (Range: 0.429 to 1.3 sec) (p= 0.004). Of the

118

47 study patients, 39 (83 %) were able to reach their baseline time (or better) by 2 weeks,

119

and 12.8 % were using an assistance device at the time they reached their baseline, no

120

difference was found between the need of an assistance devices against their BRT. The

121

remaining eight patients (17 %) reached their baseline at the 4-week post-op test (table

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

100

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1). However, all 47 patients in this study had a BRT at 2 weeks below recommended

123

safe brake time standard of 1.25 sec. Evaluation of confounding variables revealed no

124

differences with respect to age, gender, BMI and the use of assistive devices (cane,

125

walker or crutches) in the group, but there was significant difference (p = 0.02) in pre-

126

operative pain, (2 Vs 4 on pain scale). (Table 1)

127

Based on the patient surveys, a significant correlation was found between the ability to

128

drive and patient –perception, of the 39 patients that returned to baseline at 2 weeks, 26

129

(67%) stated that they felt they were ready to drive at that time. 8 patients said they were

130

not sure and 5 (17 %) patients stated that they were not ready to drive. (p<0.001)

131

From the group that did not reach their baseline at 2 weeks, all 8 (100%) patients did not

132

feel they were ready to drive. However, at 4 weeks, 7 (88%) felt they were ready to drive

133

and only one was not sure. (p < 0.001)

134

DISCUSSION:

135

TKA is an excellent option for end-stage knee arthritis with great reported results. Over

136

the last decade, advances in surgical techniques, as well as, advances in perioperative

137

management have accelerated the recovery time for the majority of patients.

138

Driving after surgery is an important task. It is a measure of recovery and return to

139

independence. Driving after TKA done with modern techniques has not been well

140

studied. The purpose of this study was to assess return to safe driving after TKA using a

141

validated instrument and in a prospective well-designed study.

142

We found that the BRT improved, on average, from the preoperative value to the 2-week

143

post-operative value by 0.064 sec, 83 % (39) of our patients were able to return to their

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

122

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

baseline brake response times, or better, by 2 weeks post-op. Left-sided surgery were

145

excluded from this study because it does not significantly affect BRT. [4] If the left leg

146

was involved, it has been suggested that driving may resume 1 week after surgery.[2,3,4]

147

Eight patients did not reach their baseline by 2 weeks post-op, but all of them were able

148

to reach it at the 4-week post-op test. However, even the 8 patients who did not return to

149

their baseline by two weeks were still under the nationally recommended safe brake time

150

standard of 1.25 seconds, which is based upon several scientific studies looking at

151

BRT.[7,4] Therefore, all patients in this study had BRT at 2 weeks below nationally

152

recommended safe brake time standards.

153

When we compared the two groups, the one that that did not reach the baseline at 2

154

weeks came to surgery with significantly worst pain (p = 0.02) scores and worst

155

preoperative BRT scores. This is in correlation with previous studies that showed worse

156

BRT scores in people with advance osteoarthritis.[5]

157

Our findings represent a substantial improvement from current recommendations. We

158

found brake reaction time returned to baseline or better in the vast majority of patients

159

undergoing contemporary TKA between 2 and 4 weeks after surgery, and all patients

160

achieved a safe BRT by 2 weeks according to a nationally recognized guideline. In

161

addition, patient perception of driving ability accurately predicted return of BRT to

162

baseline.

163

It must be stated that driving ability cannot be based solely on the BRT as the only factor

164

in allowing patients to drive after TKA. With that said, it is a simple and a powerful tool

165

in determining whether a person is able to safely react to a braking stimulus and apply the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

144

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

brake in safe manner and has valid implications for when patients are able to safely return

167

to driving a vehicle. These findings have allowed us to encourage patients to re-evaluate

168

their driving ability as soon as 2 weeks after TKA.

RI PT

166

169 170

SC

171 References.

173

1. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint

174

replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg

175

Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30.

176

2. Spalding TJ, Kiss J, Kyberd P, Turner-Smith A, Simpson AH. Driver reaction times

177

after total knee replacement. JBJS [Br]. 1994;76:754–6.

178

3. Pierson JL, Earles DR, Wood K. Brake response time after total knee arthroplasty:

179

when is it safe for patients to drive? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:840–3.

180

4. Rod Fleury, T., Favrat, B., Belaieff, W. et al. Resuming motor vehicle driving

181

following orthopaedic surgery or limb trauma. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012; 142: w13716

182

5. Hofmann UK, Jordan M, Rondak I, Wolf P, Kluba T, Ipach I. Osteoarthritis of the

183

knee or hip significantly impairs driving ability (cross-sectional survey).BMC

184

Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jan 17;15:20.

185

7.Green, Marc. “How long does it take to stop?” Methodological analysis of driver

186

perception-brake times. Transp Hum Factors. 2000; 2: 195

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

172

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

10. Meredith Parnell, Stephanie Robinson, Kristin Stone, Kristin Whitley, Anne

188

Dickerson, Timothy Reistetter. On the Road to Safety: Standardizing the RT-2S Brake

189

Reaction Time Tester. (2007)ROADI, East Carolina University. http://www.ecu.edu/cs-

190

dhs/ot/upload/AOTA_Brake_Reaction_Poster.pdf

191

11. Hernandez VH, Ong A, Orozco F, Madden AM, Post Z. When is it safe for patients to

192

drive after right total hip arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Apr; 30(4):627-30.

193

12. Liebensteiner MC, Kern M, Haid C, Kobel C, Niederseer D, Krismer M. Brake

194

response time before and after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. BMC

195

Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010.

196

13. Dalury DF, Tucker KK, Kelley TC. When Can I Drive?: Brake Response Times After

197

Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

198

2011;469(1):82-86.

199

14. Huang HT, Liang J, Hung W, Chen Y, Guo L, Wu W. Timeframe for return to

200

driving for patients with minimally invasive knee arthroplasty is associated with knee

201

performance on functional tests. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014. 15:198

202

15. Ibrahim MS, Khan MA, Nizam I, Haddad FS. Peri-operative interventions producing

203

better functional outcomes and enhanced recovery following total hip and knee

204

arthroplasty: an evidence-based review. BMC Medicine 2013. 11:37

205

16. Mallory TH, Lombardi AV, Fada RA, Dodds KL, Adams JB: Pain management for

206

joint arthroplasty: preemptive analgesia. J Arthroplasty. 2002, 17: 129-133.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

187

9

LOS Pain scale*

4 Wks. 2 Wks. 4 Wks. 2 Wks. 4 Wks. 2 Wks. 4 Wks. 2 Wks.

11.76 9.95 8.01 6.88 .916 .942 2.6 2.0

69.88 67.08 33.43 32.42 1.63 1.51 3.77 1.50

SC

BMI

SD

M AN U

Age

BRT Reached Mean

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

TE D

Table1. Difference between the cohort that reached the baseline at two weeks and the one

AC C

EP

that reached at the 4 weeks. * p < 0.02

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Enhanced recovery program for unilateral total hip arthroplasty followed at the at the time of the study

RI PT

1. Preoperative management

a. Preoperative education b. Preoperative medical clearance and risk stratification. 2. In-Hospital management

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

a. Spinal anesthesia b. Multimodal analgesia, avoiding the use of extended-release epidural morphine and patient controlled analgesia. c. Preoperative analgesia i. IV acetaminophen 1000mg (withhold in case of liver disease) ii. Celecoxib 400 mg po within 2 hours preoperatively iii. Pregabalin 75 mg po q 12 h 2 hours preoperatively d. Postoperative dosing i. Acetaminophen 650 mg po q 6 hr ii. Celecoxib 200mg po q 12 h iii. Pregabalin 75mg po q 12 h iv. PRN Medication • Oxycodone IR 10mgs po Q4hr • Ultram 50 mg po q 6hr • Toradol 30 mg IV q 6hr prn e. No use of benzodiazepines or antihistamine during postoperative period f. Early in-hospital mobilization and physical therapy, same day of surgery.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

Figure 1. The RT-2S brake reaction timer (Advanced Therapy Products, Inc. Richmond, VA) Consist of pedals, a timer, and a light box.