substantia innominata or lateral hypothalamus?

BRAIN RESEARCH ELSEVIER

Brain Research 642 (1994) 355

Erratum BRES 2

Where does damage lead to enhanced food aversion: the ventral pallidum/substantia innominata or lateral hypothalamus? Howard C. Cromwell and Kent C. Berridge Brain Research 624 (1993) 1-10 (BRES 19229) In the above article, Figures 2 and 3 were damaged. They have been reproduced below.

S CONTROL • LH-LE$10N • VP-LESION

5

18

,-n, Zcaw z

Z 0

-5

0

~ ~

$* 14

T

w ;2 >_

-10

=

nW

10 8

"' a.

0 t~ W

-20

6 4

-25 I

I

i

I

r

I

i

i

:

0

I

2

3

4

5

6

7

DAYS POST-SURGERY

Fig. 2. Cumulative percent weight change from pre-surgery weight. There was no significant difference between the LH-controls or VP/SI-controls so these groups were combined into one control group. Body weights of the GP lesion group did not differ from controls and is not shown. * denotes significance at P < 0.01. 0006-8993/94/$07.00 © 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDI 0 0 0 6 - 8 9 9 3 ( 9 4 ) 0 0 2 4 6 - 9

Z

01 L

C

vP/sl

L

LH

Fig. 3. Number of aversive taste reactions per 1-min taste trial of 1 M sucrose solution. L denotes rats which received excitotoxin injection into a particular subregion and C denotes sham-injected control animal. * * denotes significance at P < 0.001.