Abstract Currently in Australia, both the National Health and Medical Research Council ( N H M R C ) and the Public
Health
Association have stated that our immunisation uptake levels arc not of a high enough percentage within the population to prevent outbreaks of childhood vaccine preventable diseases (1996). While the literature discusses factors that are believed to influence care givers' decisions to vaccinate their children, few Australian studies focus on care giver understanding of childhood diseases and vaccination. The purpose of this descriptive study was to profile care givers who presented their children for vaccination public
at
health
clinics regarding their
Why
level
of
understanding of childhood vaccine preventable diseases.
Care giver understanding of childhood immunisation
Two hundred and
By: Alison Blair, Elizabeth Davies, Monica Nebauer, Sandra Pirozzo, Serita Saba, Catherine Turner
forty eight care givers attending one of six public clinics were asked to respond verbally to a researcher administered questionnaire. Demographic information as well as information related specifically
10 Collegian VoU No3 1997
to i m m u n i s a t i o n was c o l l e c t e d from
Care giver understanding of
each participant.
childhood immunisation
248 carers of children was conducted in
The major findings ol this preliminary
Age appropriate vaccination and immuni-
Brisbane during October to November
study indicate a very low level ol knowl-
sation ol children is one of the interna-
1995. The aim of this study was to build
edge among carers presenting their child
tional issues ol concern in health. In the
a profile of the characteristics of carers
for vaccination at the public health clinic.
1980s the W o r l d Health Organisation
presenting their children for vaccination
Twenty-three percent of carers had no
(WHO)
at ihc free immunisalion clinics run by
announced
an
Extended
A n exploratory study i n t e r v i e w i n g
knowledge regarding the vaccinations
Program of Immunisalion w i l h the target
the Brisbane City Council. I he pLirpose
that their child was receiving and the dis-
of eradicating six vaccine preventable dis-
of ihe study was to assess influential
ease for w h i c h the v a c c i n a t i o n was
eases from the world population (1995).
demographic variables that affect immu-
administered.
Currently, in many countries the child-
nisation compliance, care giver under-
In fact, 18 percent ol care givers were
hood immunisalion coverage is still less
standing of childhood immunisation and
unsure of the relationship between vacci-
than optimal (Queensland Health, 1994).
knowledge of vaccine preventable diseases and the sources of information used
nation and the likelihood of their child
The National Health Survey (ABS,
contracting an infectious disease. The
1989-90) ol Australian children aged 0-6
personal health record was not found to
years revealed o n l y 52.9 percent of
be useful as an educational resource.
Australian children to be age appropriate-
L I T E R A T U R E REVIEW
Although 99 percent of care givers
ly vaccinated. I he vaccination status for
Demographic Variables
had the booklet in their possession only
Queensland children in the N a t i o n a l
One of the primary factors studied in
8 percent had referred to it as a source of
Health Survey was 56.1 percent, howev-
relation to immunisalion compliance is
information. The major sources of infor-
er, this figure is now considered an over-
demographics of the care giver. Studies
mation were identified as child health
estimate (Queensland Health, 1994).
nurses (44%) and h o s p i t a l m i d w i v e s
In view of the evidence ol low vacci-
by care givers.
have found that the mother's age, race, education, socio-economic status and the
nation rates and, as such, low immunisa-
b i r t h order of the child are correlated
The results of this study highlight the
tion levels in Australia, it is important to
w i t h immunisation rales (Bobo, Gale,
disparity in knowledge levels among care
research what niggers parents to have
Purusbotiom & Wassilak, 1993). Bates,
givers w i t h regards to vaccination and
their children vaccinated.
(34%).
Fitzgerald, Dittus & W o l i n s k y (1994)
the diseases they prevent and the impor-
D e t e r m i n i n g the factors that con-
conducted a prospective cohort study
tant role of the midwife and child health
t r i b u t e to v a c c i n a t i o n c o m p l i a n c e is
a m o n g p o o r urban infants and t h e i r
nurse in disseminating information relat-
essential to the success ol implementing
mothers to evaluate the r e l a t i o n s h i p
ing to immunisation.
I Liture vaccination programs.
b e t w e e n f i n a n c i a l access,
personal
Collegian Vol 4 N o l 1997 11
f e a t u r e characteristics, mothers' health beliefs and
predicting tisage. Public immunisation
( H a r d i n g & O'l.ooney, 1984, Peckham,
under-immunisation. Only 67 percent ol
programs appeared to be more successful
1989, cited in Bennett & Smith, 1992).
the children in their study had received
in areas with a higher population ol peo-
their first vaccination by three months of
ple from n o n - n n g l i s h - s p e a k i n g back-
parental perception of the susceptibility or
age and only 29 percent were up-to-date
grounds as compared to areas with a high
vulnerability of the child contracting a dis-
at 7 months ol age. I hese researchers
Australian or British population.
ease. Becker, O r a c h m a n and K i r s c h t
Parental knowledge is also related to
l o u n d that adequacy of prenatal care,
The other factor in Bazeley's study
(1974) believed that vulnerability was
m a r i t a l status, co-residence w i t h the
which was considered critical in deter-
associated with greater compliance among
infant's grandmother, and perceived logis-
mining the sticcess of the program was
mothers who believed their children were
tical barriers to care were independently
the amount of administrative staff time
more vulnerable to particular diseases, had
related to both initiation and completion
committed to the program. This was evi-
children who suffered frequent illnesses,
of the vaccination schedule. Of particular
denced by the establishment of a baby
and/or believed that all children were
interest was the fact that free vaccine did
enrolment and reminder system and the
threatened by illness. In a further study by
not guarantee vaccination. The authors
number of hours that the clinic was avail-
I loutrouw and Carlson (1993), trends in
concluded that poor urban infants of sin-
able each month. As a result of surveys
the data suggested that the mother's per-
gle mothers and of mothers who received
conducted, Bazeley (1991) found that
ception of their children's vulnerability to
inadequate prenatal care, and those not
what people looked for in an immunisa-
disease may be a predictor of compliance
living w i t h their grandmother should be
tion service was convenience of location,
with immunisation, however, no signifi-
targeted lor tracking and follow-up.
privacy, lack of crowding, personalised
cant statistical differences were found in
O l the many demographic variables
service and individual attention, expertise
mothers' perceived vulnerability to indi-
studied in Blaze-Temples' (1991) sttidy of
of the provider, low cost and pleasant,
vidual infectious disease and vaccination
non-compliance with measles vaccination,
informative staff.
c o m p l i a n c e or n o n - c o m p l i a n c e . T h e authors found that mothers who perceived
o n l y the association between f a m i l y income and non-compliance was statisti-
Care giver understanding
their children to be vulnerable had a 60
cally significant. The results indicated
of immunisation
percent compliance rate, whereas, only 9.4
that low income lamilies were less likely
In addition to particular demographic fac-
percent of the mothers perceiving non-
to have vaccinated all of their children
tors and the vaccination service itself,
vulnerability were compliant. A major lim-
than middle and high income families.
there is some evidence that parental
itation of this study was the use ol a small
While the association with ethnicity was
knowledge about vaccine preventable dis-
non-representative sample.
not significant, the author notes that the
eases and lear in relation to vaccination
Parental perceptions of the risk/benefit
sample sizes ol particular ethnic groups
outcomes are significant factors in non-
ratio in relation to vaccination are another
were too small to gain a definitive picture
compliance (Blaze-Temple, I 9 9 l ; Bennett
factor related to vaccination compliance
of the cllect ol ethnicity on non-compli-
& Smith, 1992, Scott, 1994). These stud-
and one which is not necessarily congru-
ance. Other factors associated with non-
ies s h o w e d that some parents were
ent with the results ol studies in this area.
compliance were parental lear level, apa-
ignorant about the severity of different
Heery ( 1 9 8 2 ) , G o l d (1990), Igoe and
thy level and ignorance of certain facts
diseases and tended to underestimate the
Goodwin
about measles.
( 1 9 9 1 ) , Jobson and
Levy
benefits ol i m m u n i s a t i o n . A study by
(1991), Moreton (1992), and Wcingarten
Bazcley (1991) conducted a study ol
Peckham and Bedford (1989) showed that
& Gomberg (1992) analysed the risk of
an immunisation delivery system in the
parents' understanding ol the seriousness
possible side effects Irom vaccine pre-
then Castlereagh Health District of NSW,
ol a disease such as measles would be
ventable diseases as opposed to morbidity
w h i c h encompasses a number of local
weighed against the perceived safety ol
and mortality statistics for the same dis-
authorities each providing their own vac-
the vaccine, and would influence the deci-
eases, and concluded that the risks of
cination clinic service. It was found that
sion for i m m u n i s a t i o n . I m m u n i s a t i o n
being infected w i t h the disease if not
the clinic use by the mothers in the area
uptake to prevent diseases such as polio,
immunised were far greater than the risk
varied greatly and ranged Irom over 70
tuberculosis, diphtheria and tetanus may
of a permanent disability or death as a
percent to under five percent. O f the
be reduced because many parents have
side effect of vaccine.
demographic variables which were con-
never heard of these diseases or may
sidered in relation to each area's public
believe they have been eradicated while
misinformed about childhood vaccination
immunisation sticcess, only ethnic compo-
the health threat from diseases such as
by the public media, which is commonly
sition of the population was important in
measles is often considered negligible
used by parents as a major source ol
12 Collegian Vol4 No3 1997
There is evidence that parents may be
information about health issues (Bazeley &
Queensland Health was a 1994 initiative
METHODOLOGY
Kemp, 1994). A study by Harding (1985)
that arose out ol a recommendation of the
Design
of t h e c o n t e n t ol 2 5 3 a r t i c l e s in ( h e
National Immunisation Strategy (1993). It
This descriptive research was undertaken
British m e d i a on v a c c i n e
preventable
was d e s i g n e d to p r o v i d e an a c c u r a t e
using the survey m e t h o d , hthical clear-
c o m m u n i c a b l e diseases s h o w e d that the
source of information to all m o t h e r s of
ance was sought and obtained from the
majority ol articles gave no information
ncw-hom
University.
about the incidence, morbidity/mortality
( Q u e e n s l a n d Health, 1994). T h i s docu-
1 his required evidence of permission
rales, cause, s y m p t o m s and n o n - p e r m a -
ment not only has provisions to record all
to gain access to care givers presenting at
nent side effects of a disease but rather
h e a l t h visits and v a c c i n a t i o n s but also
Brisbane City Council Clinics. Prior to the
d w e l t on unusual r e a c t i o n s or d e a t h s .
e x p l a i n s in detail w h a t p a r e n t s s h o u l d
interview with participants an explanation
Most articles discussed disease prognosis
expect of children wilh regard to growth
of the project was provided and consent
as life threatening without information on
and development at different ages and the
was obtained Irom each care giver.
the availability and place of dispensing
causes, symptoms and available vaccina-
A survey instrument was developed to
v a c c i n a t i o n s , a l t h o u g h 78 a r t i c l e s did
t i o n / t r e a t m e n t for infectious c h i l d h o o d
c o l l e c t data p e r t a i n i n g to a n u m h e r of
emphasise the need for vaccination, par-
diseases. T h e maintenance of this record
dillerenl aspects of the carer and the child
ticularly for diphtheria and pertussis. In
by the parent is purely voluntary. In addi-
presenting for vaccination at child health clinics.
babies
in
Queensland
addition, minor side effects of vaccination
tion to boosting compliance with vaccina-
w e r e never m e n t i o n e d , but f o r t y - t h r e e
tion the intention behind issuing the per-
articles r e c o u n t e d figures for t h e inci-
sonal health record was to e d u c a t e care
•
demographic data on carer demographic data on child
Questions were grouped to ascertain:
dence of major side-effects of vaccination,
givers about childhood infectious diseases
•
such as brain damage. Harding concluded
a n d t h e b e n e f i t s of t h e
•
that while the media coverage could not
process. 1 his type of initiative is congru-
be classed as sensationalist it generally did
e n t w i t h t h e f i n d i n g s of 1 l o u t r o u w &
not give basic and necessary information
Carlson (1993), who identified that verbal
on the disease and its prevention.
c o m m u n i c a t i o n alone is i n a d e q u a t e as a
Care giver understanding and attitude
vaccination
health education cue.
carer p e r c e p t i o n s of, and k n o w l e d g e of, immunisation information
•
child's family composition and immunisation history
•
information on clinic visit on day of interview.
to immunisation are also frequently influ-
Findings of H o u t r o u w a n d C a r l s o n s
An initial pilot survey was undertaken
enced by advice given by health care pro-
descriptive study suggest that mailed
( n = 1 2 ) , which resulted in minor' adjust-
fessionals. Studies have shown that some
reminder cards also increase immunisation
ments to the survey instrument.
health care professionals are
either
compliance. Two recent Australian studies
unaware of, or misinterpret, contraindica-
(Gardner, Menzics, Malko & Hegney 1995
Sampling
tions to immunisation. In many cases, this
and Lee, Nosser & Lee 1995) showed high
Queensland Health conducts approxi-
has r e s u l t e d in r e d u c e d i m m u n i s a t i o n
immunisation uptake rates in local popula-
mately
uptake (Bennett & Smith, 1992; Lakhani,
tions when an immunisation record keep-
throughout Brisbane. At 12 of these clin-
M o r s e , M o r g a n , D a l e , & Vailc, 1987,-
ing and reminder system was introduced.
ics the Brisbane City Council runs a free
50
Child
Health
Clinics
Feckham & Bedford, 1989, Walker, 1990).
However, Rixon, M a r c h & I lolt (1994)
i m m u n i s a t i o n s e r v i c e at c e r t a i n t i m e s
In an attempt to set national standards for
surveyed general practitioners in Northern
each week, fortnight or month. A conve-
c o n t r a i n d i c a t i o n s to i m m u n i s a t i o n in
Sydney and found only 16 percent used a
nience sample was selected from carers
and
reminder system for vaccination follow-
presenting children for vaccination at six
Medical Research C o u n c i l ( 1 9 9 4 ) pub-
up. Further descriptive surveys of general
of t h e c h i l d health clinics in Brisbane.
lished a series of guidelines to health care
p r a c t i t i o n e r s in South W e s t e r n S y d n e y
T h o s e clinics chosen for inclusion in the
professionals. While there are limited eval-
were conducted by Kiddle & Harris (1995)
sample were the o n e s with the highest
uation data available on the use of these
and I lerceg & L o n g b o t t o m (1995) w h o
number of children presenting for vacci-
Australia,
the National
Health
publications, some surveys have indicated
found 8 percent and 16 percent respec-
n a t i o n . T h r o u g h p u t was an i m p o r t a n t
that the majority of general practitioners
tively used a reminder' system. T h e Herccg
s a m p l i n g c o n s i d e r a t i o n because five of
are using these publications as guidelines
and Longbottom (1995) study showed
the clinics provided a sampling period of
for immunisation (1 .iddle & Harris, 1995).
that
only one to two hours per fortnight.
health
services
dealing
with
Aboriginal populations were far more like-
1 he convenience sample consisted of
Sources of information
ly to have a record keeping and recall ser-
245 carers p r e s e n t i n g 253 c h i l d r e n for
T h e personal health record distributed by
vice than other practices.
vaccination. A relatively even number ol Collegian Vol4 No 3 1 W 1 3
respondents was obtained from each clinic, with the exception of Fortitude Valley,
data and cross tabulations between vari-
A number of reasons were given for being accompanied as illustrated in Figure 1.
ables of interest.
where reduced opening hours of one hour
Because of the wide range of values for
The largest number of children pre-
per month limited sample size. Horlitude
variables such as age, source of informa-
senting at the clinics were those dtre for
Valley was retained in the sample because
tion, residence and country of origin of
the two-month vaccination (27%). These
it was ethnically diverse. Sample numbers
respondent it was not possible to do fur-
were followed by those presenting lor the
ther analysis of variance between these and
s i x - m o n t h vaccination (26%) and the
other variables because of the high number
four-month vaccination (20%). There was
Table 1:
of empty cells in the cross tabulation.
a noticeable decrease in numbers of chil-
Sample numbers from each clinic.
Another harrier to further analysis was the
dren presenting lor vaccination that was
overwhelming percentage ol respondents
due at 12 m o n t h s ( 1 0 % ) , 18 m o n t h s
in one category for variables such as race,
(14%) and five years (6%). There was one
gender and relationship to child.
person presenting for the vaccination dtie
lor each clinic are outlined in Table I.
Clinic
Number Interviewed
Coorparoo
50
Chermside
48
Indooroopilly
44
Results
Upper M t Cravall
43
Demographic characteristics
nation, 48% had been born in a public
Ashgrove
4t
Of the primary carers 94 percent were
hospital, 5 1 % in a private hospital and
Fortitude Valley
I9
female. The mean age of the carer was
1% born at home. Most of the care givers
31.57 years w i t h a range of 19 to 48
presenting at the clinics had either' one
Data collection To ensure inter-rater reliability, all interviews were conducted over a two month period by one research assistant. All care givers were interviewed prior to their child's vaccination/s. 'I his process was considered necessary to reduce recall bias, because during the vaccination process the doctor explained each vaccination and the diseases targeted.
at 1 5 years. Of the children presenting for vacci-
years. Ninety-eight percent of the carers
(55%) or two (32%) children. Only 9 per-
were the parent ol the child. Other carers
cent ol the care givers had three children
were grandparents and paid carers.
and three percent had four c h i l d r e n .
The majority of carers (72.3 %) were
There were no families presenting with
born in Australia. The remainder (27.7%)
more than four children. When the care
were born in one of 22 different coun-
giver had more than one child in the fam-
tries. Distribution of the carers according
ily 99 percent of those children had previ-
to race indicated 8 7 . 1 % Caucasian, 9.3%
ously been vaccinated. O f the children
Asian, 2.4% Indian, 0.8% Aboriginal and
presenting for vaccination, 61 percent
0.4% M a o r i . O f the respondents inter-
were the first child, 30 percent the second
viewed, 95 percent reported that they had
child, seven percent the third child and
I he, child's mother was assumed to be
no dilliculty reading English and 94 per-
two percent the fourth child.
the primary carer and thus was the person
cent reported that they had no difficulty
interviewed. If the child's mother was not
speaking English.
present then the nearest accompanying relative to the child was interviewed.
Care giver understanding
Tertiary qualifications were held by 46
In response to being asked what diseases
percent of the carers. O l those who did
their child was being vaccinated against,
O n l y responses that were unassisted
not hold tertiary qualifications, 12 per-
only 13.7 percent were able to correctly
by prompts from accompanying people or
cent had a technical or commercial post
name all the diseases. A f u r t h e r 10.1
w r i t t e n material were recorded. II the
high school qualification, 27 percent had
percent were able to correctly name the
carer knew the vaccination names (eg.
completed high school to year 12 and 14
vaccination but not the disease, and 53.6
Triple Antigen, Sahin) then the interview-
percent had attended high school to year
percent were able to name at least one
er prompted lor the name of the targeted
10 or b e l o w . T h e three respondents
vaccine or disease. The remaining 22.6
disease/s.
whose highest education level was prima-
percent had no idea what vaccinations
Data analysis All data were coded and entered into a
ry s c h o o l , were from rural villages
their child was receiving at that visit or
throughout Asia.
the diseases the child should be protected were
from. Comments from the latter group of
SPSS f o r
accompanied by one or more adults. The
care givers included: "I've just forgotten",
Windows software release 6.1 Numerical
a c c o m p a n y i n g person was e i t h e r the
"Its in the book (personal health record)',
values were assigned to each value and
child's lather (52%), the carer's mother
"The ones they are dtie for",- "The boost-
value labels were recorded. Statistical
(24%), another member of the carer's fam-
er"; "The two (tour, six, etc.) month lot".
methods were applied to (hid frequency
ily (14%) or a Iriendof the carer (8%).
W h e n asked for their perception ol an
data
spread
sheet
using
1 4 Colltaiau Vol 4 No 3 1997
A number ol carers ( 2 5 % )
unvaccinated child's likelihood of con-
Figure 1
tracting a specific infectious disease, 56 percent thought that (here w o u l d he a
Reason for Accompanying Carer
17 percent
Toddler control 21.2%
t h o u g h t there w o u l d be a m o d e r a t e
Hold baby 18.2%
chance, 10 percent a lair chance and 18
Shopping 3.0%
great chance. A f u r t h e r
percent thought the likelihood was either
Day carer 3.0%
minimal or were unsure. Visiting 7.6%
Many of the carers who thought there was a minimal chance qualified this state-
Parent role 18.2%
ment by adding words to the effect that
Driver 13.6%
they thought it was not worth taking any
Translating 3.0%
risk. Carers who thought that their child
Moral support 12.1%
had a great chance of acquiring an infectious disease often remarked that they were aware ol cases of measles, mumps or pertussis among Iriends' children or day care/pre-school groups their child attend-
Figure 2
Sources of Information Used by Care Givers
ed. Overall comments from respondents indicated that they felt that diseases such as p o l i o , diphtheria and tetanus had a
Child's teacher 1% General knowledge 14"A
Child health nurse 44% General Practitioner 6%
much lower likelihood ol being acquired than measles, mumps and rubella.
Paediatrician 4%
Home country 2%
Nursing experience 4%
Health record 8%
Sources of information
Family member 11%
Media 7%
Carers used a wide variety of information
Fridge magnet 2%
Friend 4%
sources relating to vaccination, the most
Hospital midwife 30%
Brochures 12%
popular being child health nurses (44%) and hospital midwives (30%). Figure 2 summarises the use of information sources ol information available to the care givers. W h e n asked if they had found the accompanied carers 18.2 percent indicat-
information they had seen or been given
problems for those carers who presented
on childhood vaccination to he useful, 64
at the clinics for vaccinations. Anecdotal
ed that the accompanying person was
percent replied very useful; 16 percent
evidence by care givers supported high
required to hold the baby during the vac-
moderately useful,- and 5 percent found
satisfaction levels of the location of the
cination procedure, while 12.1 percent
the information oi limited use. Comments
clinic and the convenience of the opening
indicated they needed an accompanying
from the latter group included: "I would
hours. However, most mothers attending
person to provide moral support. These
have liked it in my first language",- "I need-
the clinics were not in full time employ-
c o m b i n e d reasons lor accompaniment
ed a more personal explanation ol the dis-
ment and the convenience sample was
(30.3%) indicate a high need by the carer
eases and program".
confined to care givers presenting at clin-
for support during the vaccination proce-
Further anecdotal information highlight-
ics. A major limitation of this study is that
dure which may be perceived as a stressful
ed the value care givers place on personal
it has only studied vaccination compliers.
experience by the carer. Ibis represents a
interaction with health care professionals.
Further research is required to ascertain
significant area for further research.
Respondents had wanted information pri-
the needs of carers in the non-compliance
Previous studies have highlighted the
marily in Chinese but also Vietnamese,
group, in terms of clinic location, opening
educational level ol carers as factors influ-
hours and facilities to assist those accom-
encing immunisation uptake. Results of
panied by other children.
this study suggest that the carers attend-
Korean, Japanese and Afrikaans.
Discussion Both clinic hours and location posed no
A significant number of carers (25%)
ing clinics for the vaccination of their
were accompanied to the clinic. Of the
children generally have a higher level of Collegian Vol 4 No 3 l!)97 15
feature education. It is carers with lower levels of
a Personal Health Record to every mother
redressing some of the confusion and lack
education w h o have previously been iden-
in Queensland has not been an effective
of k n o w l e d g e r e g a r d i n g v a c c i n e s a n d
tified by Bobo et al ( 1 9 9 4 ) a n d Rlaze-
strategy in e d u c a t i n g care givers about
i m m u n i s a t i o n . A c c o r d i n g lo Bazeley's
Temple (199]) for tracking and follow up
vaccination. I lowever results suggest it
(1991) research, and supported by anec-
of vaccination compliance.
could
as a
dotal c o m m e n t s , people want person-
A p p r o x i m a t e l y live p e r c e n t ol t h e
reminder. O n l y 8 percent of the sample of
alised service a n d individual a t t e n t i o n
respondents reported difficulty speaking
carers used the record as a source of infor-
when they attend for immunisation.
and reading English.
mation, even though the sample was con-
Flowever, personalised service alone
fined lo care givers w h o chose to vacci-
has b e e n i d e n t i f i e d by H o u t r o u w a n d
W h e n correlated with the location of
p I ay a s t r o n g i n f l u e n c e
Carlson
( 1 9 9 3 ) as i n a d e q u a t e ,
and
requires the backup of written inlormat i o n . It is also i m p o r t a n t to n o t e t h e i n a d e q u a c y ol the Q u e e n s l a n d
Health
personal health record alone as a source of information in this study as only eight percent of care givers used this information. the clinic this indicated that most of these
nate their child, yet 99.2 percent of care
r e s p o n d e n t s p r e s e n t e d at I n d o o r o o p i l l y
givers interviewed b r o u g h t the b o o k l e t
Conclusion
(58%) and Fortitude Valley (25%). This
with lhem to the clinic.
T h e purpose ol this descriptive study was
would indicate the appropriateness of dis-
Only I 3.7 percent of carers could accu-
to profile care givers who presented their
t r i b u t i n g b r o c h u r e s in languages o t h e r
rately name the diseases their child was
children for vaccination at public health
than English at these locations.
being vaccinated against and 22.6 percent
clinics regarding their level of understand-
T h e Queensland Health Department
of carers had no knowledge ol either the
ing of childhood vaccine preventable dis-
p u b l i s h e s i m m u n i s a t i o n b r o c h u r e s in
disease or the vaccination. H o w e v e r 56
eases. T h e major findings of this study
Chinese, Japanese and Vietnamese, how-
percent of the carers sampled perceived a
indicate a very low level of k n o w l e d g e
ever, anecdotal information from the child
great chance of their child contracting an
among carers, the limited usefulness of the
health
the
infectious disease. T h e s e figures support
personal health record as an educational
D e p a r t m e n t had often been oul-ol-stock
studies such as those by Becker et al (1974),
resource and the importance of the nurse
in the preceding 12 months. This meant
M a k et al ( 1 9 8 4 ) a n d H o u t r o u w a n d
as a source of information. I he results ol
that the clinic nurses were often unable to
Carlson ( I 9 9 3 ) w h o found that mothers
the study highlight that although the sam-
supply, care givers with the information
who perceived
be
ple was biased towards care givers w h o
req Lies ted.
extremely vulnerable lo disease had a much
complied with the immunisation schedule,
greater immunisation compliance rate than
even the majority of t h o s e had limited
mothers with less fear of vulnerability.
knowledge regarding vaccination and the
nurses
indicated
that
Results ol this study were consistent with findings that the birth order of the
their children
to
child correlates with immunisation compli-
Results indicating care givers lack of
targeted childhood diseases.
ance. A significant number (61%) of chil-
understanding were surprising given that
T h e r e is an excellent opportunity for
dren presenting at the clinic were first born
these care givers were seeking vaccination
nurses lo provide the personalised service
within their family. Fewer children (30%)
for their children and 85percenl had rated
desired by clinic clients along with writ-
w e r e p o s i t i o n e d s e c o n d in t h e family.
the information they received as uselul.
ten information in the form of the person-
Twenty-seven percent of children present-
This may indicate that the perceived use-
al health record, brochures and so on, as
ing at the clinics were there to receive their
fulness of inlormation is related more to
p a r t of t h e i r h e a l t h e d u c a t i o n role in
first two-month vaccination. Of the sample
w h e n to a t t e n d for v a c c i n a t i o n r a t h e r
immunisation clinics. T h e importance of
of carers, 55 percent had only one child
than why. T h i s could be an example of
t h i s r o l e n e e d s lo be a p p r e c i a t e d a n d
and 32 p e r c e n t had two c h i l d r e n . T h i s
r e l i a n c e on an e x t e r n a l c u e , w h e n to
enacted by other nurses "at the coalface",
result could suggest that it is not conve-
attend, rather than on intrinsic motiva-
such as p a e d i a t r i c nurses, c h i l d h e a l t h
nient for carers with more than two chil-
tion. As Child Health Nurses (44%) and
nurses, c o m m u n i t y nurses and midwives
dren to attend the clinics, which have very
Hospital Midwives (30%) were the major-
in order to increase vaccination compli-
limited physical space and resources for
sources of information for the carers sam-
ance within the community.
small children.
pled, they represent the major potential
Results suggest that the distribution of 1 6 Collegian Vol 4 No 3 1997
that nurses have as h e a l t h e d u c a t o r s in
1 he results of this study lend support to the p r o p o s e d c h a n g e s lo the H e a l t h
( D r u g s & Poisons) R e g u l a t i o n , 1996, in Q u e e n s l a n d which will allow nurses with a p p r o p r i a t e e n d o r s e m e n t to a d m i n i s t e r c h i l d h o o d vaccination. T h e r e is potential lor further research focusing on the value of the interaction between nurses and prim a r y c a r e r s a n d t h e i n f l u e n c e of t h i s interaction on the carer's decision to vaccinate their child.
Implications for further research T h e r e are three issues raised hy this study which warrant further research. T h e s e are carer information, carer need for support during the procedure and the value of the personal health record distributed
by
Q u e e n s l a n d I lealth. T h i s s t u d y focused only on users of Brisbane C i t y C o u n c i l C l i n i c s . F u r t h e r studies to capture data from carers using o t h e r locations lor vaccination would be useful t o d e t e r m i n e il the results can be extrapolated to the wider
community.
These other locations would
include
G e n e r a l P r a c t i t i o n e r Offices, Aboriginal Medical Services and the like. It would also be of value to determine the correlation between carer understanding of the significance of c h i l d h o o d vaccination in p r o t e c t i n g against disease and the information sources used. T h e design of this study did not provide for this relationship to be determined. Nurses were identified as a significant source ol information, but a limitation in data gathering was the lack of discrimination in determining w h e t h e r the information related to the need to attend for the r o u t i n e c o u r s e of v a c c i n a t i o n or actual education about protection from
specific
diseases. T h e results of this study indicate d e m o n s t r a t e d c o m p l i a n c e may rest with direction to attend rather then
informed
decision making on the part ol the carer. It is further r e c o m m e n d e d that
future
studies focus on reasons why carers perceive the p r o c e d u r e of vaccination to be so stressful that they seek the support of o t h e r s during the p r o c e d u r e . T h i s infor-
1993) Risk factors tor delayed immunisation in a random sample of 1 163 children from O r e g o n possible causes ol some c a r e r s a v o i d i n g and Washington. Paediatrics 91 308-314 Feery B 1982 Incidence and type of reactions having their child vaccinated, either totalto triple antigen (DTP) and D T ( C D T ) vaccines. ly or in failing to c o n t i n u e with the comThe Medical Jotmnil of Australia 27 51 1-515 Gardner A Menzies 1) Malko K and Hcgncy plete course of injections. D 1995 Hiijh uptake and iiiiiimnisdtmji rates in a local Finally, the results of this study clearly population hased immunisation reminder service. Proceedings of the Fourth National Immunisation i n d i c a t e t h e need to e v a l u a t e t h e effecConference Sydney Gold R 1990 Annotation: does pertussis vactiveness of the personal h e a l t h record as cine cause brain damage? loumal of Paeduitric Child an educational resource for m o t h e r s prior Health 26 240-241 H a r d i n g C M S O ' l . o o n e y BA 1984 to their discharge from hospital. It is eviP e r c e p t i o n s and Beliefs about Nine Diseases. dent that its usefulness as an educational Public Health 98 284 - 293. Harding C 1985 Immunisation as depicted by strategy is less than would be anticipated the British national press. Community Mediant 7 87-98 for the considerable cost involved in disHerceg A & LongboUom H 1995 A national Survey of provider initifutiisfifiofi />ra<.(ic« and vaccine stortribution them throughout t h e state. age methods. Proceedings ol the Fourth National Immunisation Conference Sydney 1 loutrouw S & Carlson K 1993 T h e relationship between maternal characteristics, maternal vulnerability beliefs, and immunization compliance. AUTHORS Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nutsm^ 16: 1 41-50 By: BLAIR Alison RN, DipAppSc(Avondale Igoe J & Goodwin L 1991 Meeting the chalCollCooranbong) BNursfACU} l e n g e ol i m m u n i s i n g t h e n a t i o n ' s c h i l d r e n . MNurs(Flinders) MRCNA Lecturer Paeduitric Nursing 17: 6 583-585 DAVIES E l i z a b e t h A RN, BSc(C.riff) Jobson S & Levy M 1991 Immunisation - beneDipAppSc(QldlT) MEd(Qld) FRCNA fits outweigh risks. Paedialtic Nursinij Repietv 4: 2 7-10 Associate Professor, Head of School Lakhani A Morris R M o r g a n M Dale C & Vaile M 1987 Measles immunisation: Feasibility of NEBAUER M o n i c a L RN RM, DipAppSc a 90% target uptake. Archives of Diseases in Childhood BAppSc(QldlT) MPhil(Criff) FRCNA 62 1209 - 1214 Senior Lecturer Lee F Nosscr V and Lee K 1995 Fairfield iiiiiniiP I R O Z Z O S a n d r a L RN RM C T C , iiistitioii task forte- a local community worhint} together to DipAppSc(QldlT) BSc(Qld) M P H ( Q l d ) immunise P r o c e e d i n g s of t h e Fourth N a t i o n a l FRCNA Immunisation Conference Sydney Senior Lecturer Liddle J and Harris M 1995 Immunisation and SABA Serita A RN RM, DipNurstd general practitioners-. What CPs know iinif do. DipAppSc(Qld) BA(Qld) MHA(UNSW) Proceedings of the Fourth National Immunisation RCN(NSW) FRCNA Lecturer Conference Sydney Mak D Manning V Waters C & Wild A 1984 TURNER C a t h e r i n e RN, BA(Qld) /iHHiHinsrtffOH Status oj Pre-School Childien in the Perth CradDipTeach(McAuleyCollQld) Melropolitan area, Reasons for Non-Compliance and MNurs(Flindcrs) Head of Department. Parental AftitidJrs to (.ompulsory fm IN 101 is'rt lion. Lliiiversily of Western Australia Division of Social a n d P r e v e n t i v e M e d i c i n e D e p a r t m e n t of REFERENCES Medicine Australian Bureau of Statistics 1990 National Moreton ) 1992 Lducating parents and profesHealth Suivey Health Related Actions. Queensland Cat sionals. Health Visitor 65. 8 266-267 No 43753 Canberra National Childhood Immunisation Committee 1995 Draft strategy foi lijc implementation Bates A Fitzgerald J Dittus R. & Wolinsky F of an Australian dnldhood immunisation register. 1994 Risk factors lor under immunisation in poor Peckham C & Bedford Id 1989 Towards better urban infants .JAMA 272: 14 1 105 1 1 10. immunisation rates. Ihe Ptactitioner 233 1343-1344 Bazeley P 1 99 I I he influence of immunisation P u b l i c H e a l t h A s s o c i a t i o n 1996 Policy providers on immunisation behaviour. Proceedings of the Statements. Public Health Association of Australia Second national Immunisation Conference lnc Canberra Canberra Queensland i lealth 1994 Policy on childhood Bazeley P S K e m p L 1994 Childhood iuiwioiivifioti in Queensland. Brisbane GoPrint Immunisation - the role of parents and service pioviders. Rixon G M a r c h I. & H o l t D 1994 C a n b e r r a Australian G o v e r n m e n t P u b l i s h i n g Immunisation practices of general practitioners in Service Becker M Dracliman R & Kirscbt J 1971 A metropolitan Sydney. Australian Journal of Public Health 18: 3 258-260 new approach to explaining sick-role behaviour in mation could provide useful insight into
low-income populations. Ameiican Journal of PIIMJL Health 64: 3 205-215 Bennett P & Smith C 1992 Parents atntudinal and social influences on childhood vaccination Health Munition Reseat cb 7-. 3 341-348 ISIaze-TcmpIc D 1991 immunisation noncompliance. What patents know anil ttndet stand about measles. Proceedings of t h e S e c o n d National Immunisation Conference Canberra 27-29 May 19-24 fiobo J Gale.) Purusboltoin B & Wassilak S
S c o t t P 1994 Alollins' perceptions of children's immunisations and preventable childhood diseases. U n i v e r s i t y ol Alaska A n c h o r a g e M a s t e r s Dissertation Ann Arbor Ml LIMI. W a l k e r D 1 9 9 0 Pertussis i m m u n i s a t i o n : Professional attitudes and knowledge. Health Visitor 63. II 386-387 Weingarlen C & Gomberg S 1992 Measles: again an epidemic. Paedialtic Nursini) 18 369-374 World Health Organisation 1995 iy[>5 World Health Day. Global Polio Eradication Bulletin Collegian Vol 4 No 3 1997 1 7
»