Zeolitization of pumice in ash-sodium salt solutions

Zeolitization of pumice in ash-sodium salt solutions

Materials Chemistry ZEOLITIZATION and Physics, 201-2 OF PUMICE IN ASH-SODIUM L.M. SAIJA, R. OTTANA' Istituto 8 (1983) di Chimica SALT SOLUTIO...

460KB Sizes 4 Downloads 106 Views

Materials

Chemistry

ZEOLITIZATION

and Physics,

201-2

OF PUMICE IN ASH-SODIUM

L.M. SAIJA, R. OTTANA' Istituto

8 (1983)

di Chimica

SALT SOLUTIONS

and C. ZIPELLI

Industriale,

Via Salita S. Lucia

207

16

Facolta

di Scienze,

Universita

di Messina,

39, 98013 Pistunina-Messina

sopra Contesse,

(Italy)

N. BURRIESCI Istituto CNR di Ricerche ne e 1' Accumulo

sui Metodi e Processi

dell'Energia,

98013 Pistunina-Messina Received

pumice

The

media.

of zeolitization

39,

10 August 1982

has selectively

influence

per la Trasformazio-

sopra Contesse,

(Italy)

22 June 1982; accepted

ABSTRACT Lipari

Chimici

Via Salita S. Lucia

been

transformed

of NaOH concentration

into zeolites

and residence

in NaOH/NaCl

time on the degree

are discussed.

INTRODUCTION Natural

and

zeolites

synthetic

have

been

widely

in view of their useful physico-chemical

properties.

as

several

selective

the use

of

adsorbents zeolites

and

as additives

and additives

to fertilizers

and

of

low

cost

reported

to

both

alkaline

and

an

moreover

(pumice) have

made

arising the

be

and

be

a

series

from

have

by

successfully of

been

Formation high

reported

treatment

of

environment, by

To

conditions

to

into

disclose Lipari the

many Authors

in

by

simulate

under a the

which

product

of

for different

have

presence

these

been of

effects

rhyolitic

commercial

pumice.

effects

properties

nature

i.e.

reported

for animals

ion exchange

ratio

(7).

(1,6) have

feed supplement

zeolites

cation/OH-

transformed

experiments

alkaline

of

environment

preparative

hydrothermal of

a

saline

explore

Authors

to detergents,

industry

Beside their applications

in view of the efficient

material.

favoured

could

influence

solution

the

to

catalysts,

in

employed

zeolite

ash we

distribution

Besides alkaline natural

works and

on salt

materials

(7,8). 0254JJ584/83/0000~000/$03.00

0 Elsevier Sequoia/Printed

in The Netherlands

208

However, of glass

used

The

and

of zeolites

exploitation

made

all

dissolution

aggregates

are

though

of

(7).

under

chemical

process.

In

of

pumice) and products

fact,

this

combination

state

lack

on the formation

overcome

various

works

detailed

Fe

has

time,

been

times

several

of the zeolitization

in

for industrial

of

several

hydrothermal

temperature

examined

on kinetic

and crystalline

opportunities

residence

limitation

of

information

of large crystals

they also fail to disclose

the To

these

and NaOH

the

raw

weeks

runs

were

concentration.

material

(Lipari

process.

EXPERIMENTAL The

material

raw

was

rhyolitic

particle

size,

pumice

60

np,

from

Lipari

(PUMEX

commercial

Peerless),

mean

composition

(wt%): SiO2, 71.81; A1203, 12.74; Ti02, 0.14; Fe203, 1.75; FeO,0.64;

with

the

following

typical

K20, 3.63; Na20, 3.23; CaO, 1.36; MgO, 0.60; H20, 3.88; Total, 99.98 All of %

L

solid, NaOH

1 to The to

experiments =

All

10 hrs.

remove

of

liquid),

varying

products

out

were

of

XRD patterns containing

by comparing 100%

same

used

in

of

were

The

the

pumice

this

S/L

20

ratio

and

=

l/5,

conditions wt%

and

in a NaCl

dried

washed

product

residence

with

was

(S

(T =

saturated

(9). =

amount

95OC)

with

times

from

solution

(30%).

distillated

water

examined

X-ray

then

by

Cu Ku radiation.

various

zeolites

peak

zeolite under

paper,

a

to

run

the X-ray

certain

raw

9

filtered

chloride.

quantities

at

isothermal

from

(XRD) using Ni-filtered

Relative

the

carried

experiments

soluble

diffraction

those

amount

concentration

reaction

from

were

mean

intensities

species.

experimental

namely

were

higher

Such

estimated

with

those

samples

conditions

temperature

from

the

of samples

were

obtained

different

from

reaction

time

and

(10). Mdssbauer

spectra

in transmission indicated Water following

were

geometry

obtained

at

77

(LNT)

and

with a constant-acceleration

295

(RT) from

following

powders

the procedure

in ref. 11, 13. adsorption

capacities

the procedure

(at relative

previously

reported

humidity (12).

of 20%) were determined

209

RESULTS

AND DISCUSSION

Yields

of

(R-wt%) of starting 1

Fig. residence

shows time,

into zeolite, In

(conversion)

transformation

given

in

terms

of

%

residue

pumice.

the for

typical various

increases

kinetics % of NaOH.

with increasing

taking

particular,

are

into

account

of

transformation

as

a

function

The rate of transformation

of pumice

% of N&H. that

the

zeolitic

species

obtained

80

60

5c

‘1

‘3

‘5

‘7

‘9

I

Time(h) Fig. 1. % of residue, q NaOH = 12%; VNaOH

as a function = 15%;

l

of

of time. ARaOH

NaOH = 18%.

~9%;

ANaOH

= 11%;

210

are characterized

by a lower Si02/Al

2.3 wt% for Faujasite) tion

of

pumice

into

0 ratio (1.18 wt% for hydroxysodalite, 23 (5.5) and considering that the transforma-

than pumice zeolites

requires

solubility

is clear that high R values imply low conversion

of SiO as Na2SiO 2 3 and viceversa.

, it

25.

'1

3

5

‘7

Time

Ch)

Fig. 2. Degree of crystallization

l

NaQH

= 13%; ANaOH

Fig. time the

2

shows

at different induction

that

the

time

NaOH to

hydrothermal

and

amorphous

one

of

the

reactants

at

of

concentrations. decrease. process

increases

t = 7 hrs

of residence

as

Increasing

This

is

involves

easily

a

reaction

function

NaOH

of

by

interaction

a

higher

rate

and

causes

considering between

soda

concentration leads

to

a

of

higher

time.

in terms of the degree of crystallization as a function

= 9%;

residence

concentration

understood

chemical

consequently the

time.ONaOH

= 20%.

zeolitization

at equal residence

Product distribution measured

degree

alumina-silicate;

% of crystallization

as a function

= 16%; A NaOH

the

1

‘9

of % NaOH,

varies

(selectivity)

in the manner

shown

211

in

Fig.

indicating

3,

prevalence

of one

of

sodalite

(hereinafter

abundance

is strongly

three

the

main

following

indicated dependent

each

regions zeolites:

respectively

one

Zeolite

characterized Pc,Faujasite,

as PC, F and Hy) whose

by

the

Hydroxyrelative

upon the initial NaOH concentration.

: 10Q ._

p---b++--iL

z

N ._ 3

75_

‘9

‘11



‘13



, ‘15 Jr



‘20

% NaOH Fig. 3. Product

distribution

time of 7 hrs.

A

In fact, as shown of

PC

while

a

occurring

explained

by

the

solution.

with low Si02/A1203 Fig. function

4

shows

in Fig.

0

at

higher

the

of residence

favours

intermediate solubility

Therefore ratios

of NaOH concentraion

Faujasite;

l

at

the

favour the formation

Hydroxysodalite,

concentrations. of

SiO

2

higher

in

This

comparison

NaOH

time,

amount

of

at different

the

the

onset

of

trend

can

be

with

A1203

in

concentration

(like Hy) are the main products

relative

at residence

Zeolite PC.

3, low NaOH concentrations

concentration

high

Faujasite

alkaline

as a function

Hydroxysodalite;

zeolite

zeolites

formed.

species

NaOH concentration.

formed

as

a

At the highest

212

75 50_

,v”-*

25_

D----O--Q

0

Fig. 4, Zeolite species formed as a function of residence time, at different NaOH concentration. A Hydroxysodalite; 0 Faujasite; # Zeolite PC.

and lowest NaOH concentration there is no influence of residence time in the zeolite species formed. At any intermediateconcentration,an increase of residence time causes a

shift of the zeolite phases toward species

that are formed at lower NaOH concentration (Fig. 3). These considerations outline the difficulty of obtaining pure samples of any of the zeolitic species in the range of NaOH concentration from 9 to 13%.

213

Product

distribution

capacity

(12).

in

5

Fig.

maximum Fig.

as

a

exists

3,

Faujasite

In

fact,

of

function

of

behaviour species

at higher

is

which values

in the structure

Mossbauer

products

of of

the

of %

our

concentration.

It

of about

more

NaOH

of

water

allows

by

a

comparison

of

indicates

Fig. 5. Water adsorption tration.

than

noted

in

other

in the a higher

process.

capacity

zeolitic degree

species

the It

pumice

ratio

be

presence,

quantitative

distribution Fe2+/Fe

can

reported that

a

from above

this

zeolitic species

region, species.

is formed

large amounts of water due to the pore constraint

zeolitization

and

zeoli'ces is

the Hydroxysodalite

on the degree of crystallization

in

the H20 adsorption

11%. As evident

the

gain information

3+

through

on

result

adsorb

also

pumice, the

NaOH

adsorbed

of the Hydroxysodalite

spectroscopy

transformation

water

concentration

is not able to adsorb

implicit

the

amount

as a NaOH

this

of

which

The

can also be finger-printed

evaluation

chemical is

state

possible,

formed

zeolitization

on the zeolites

of of

in

the

Fe

in

fact,

to

the Fe 2i/Fe3+

by evaluating

structure of

(1).

(14). (14).

as a function

A lower Characte-

of NaOH concen-

214

rization of

several zeolite species obtained from pumice have revealed

very Small differences in the nature and distribution of iron which is 3+ to these results the raw pumice present only as Fe (14). In contrast shows large differences in the chemical state and distribution of iron 2+ J+ which is present both as Fe and Fe . The typical Mtissbauerspectra of the valcanic starting materials (Lipari pumice} and a zeolite {Hy) obtained by hydrothermal synthesis are shown in Fig. 6 and 7, respectively. These figures show that the variation on the Mossbauer spectra which 2+ accompany the zeolitization process only concern the Fe resonance line, which disappears when XRD gives evidence for a totally zeolitized product.

Fig. 6.

Iron-57 Mijssbauerspectrum measured at LNT of the Lipari Pumice.

215

l.OO_

c ii f0.99_

+ +

++ + l

+

5

a

-70 ‘8

‘6

‘4

-‘2.

Velocity Fig. 7. Typical

Iron-57 Mossbauer

pared by hydrothermal

synthesis

‘0

‘2

cmm-

spectrum

‘4

‘6

‘8

'10

s-9

measured

at LNT of the zeolites

pre-

from Lipari pumice.

CONCLUSION The

main

conditions

findings

of zeolites

Furthermore is

time - it

(

is

this

work

for the transformation

ly to a variety

- it

of

that

of pumice

the

variation

in alkaline

of

the

reactions

media leads selective-

such as Zeolite PC, Faujasite

and Hydroxysodalite.

is shown that:

possible

to

obtain

5 hr) acceptable difficult

expecially

are

to

the

zeolite

structure

from an industrial

obtain

pure

samples

by

using

a

residence

point of view; of

in the range of NaOH concentration

any

of

the

zeolitic

species

of 9 to 13% in our reaction

conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This are

work

has

indebted

for

the supervision

been

supported

financial

by

support.

Ente The

of Prof. Nicola Giordano

Minerario

research

has

Sicilian0 been

from the University

to

whom

conducted of Messina.

AA

under

216 REFERENCES 1.

D.W. BRECK - "The properties and applications of zeolites", Ed, R.P. Powsend, (London), 391 (1980).

2.

Y. MORI, Y. EDO, H. TORYO, IT0 - Zasso Kenky, 2,

21 (1974).

3.

I.M.J. SCHWUGER, H.G. SMOLKA - Colloid Polymer Sdi., 256, 270 (1978).

4.

K. TORI1 - in Proc. Conf. on Occurrence Properties and Utilization of Natural zeolites, Tucson, Arizona, June 6-14, 1976.

5.

S. VALENTE, S. CAVALLARO, N. BURRIESCI, S. GALVAGNO, C. ZIPELLI - Zeolites, in press.

6.

F. SCHWOCHOW, L. PUPPE - Angew. Chemie Internat. Edit., 14. 620 (1975).

7.

R. AIELLO, C. COLELLA, D.G. CASEY, L.B. SAND - Fifth Int. Conf. Zeolites, Naples, 1980, p. 49.

8.

H. HOTTA, K. TORII, M. ASAKA - "Synthesis of zeolite X from diatonite by the treatment with NaOH-NaC1 solution", Reports of the Government Industrial Research Institute, Tohoka, n0 6, November 1975, pp. 32-39.

9.

S.F. LUCA' - Unpublished

results.

10. L.M. SAIJA, R. OTTANA', C. ZIPELLI, N. BIJRRIESCI- Unpublished

results.

11. J.C.J. BART. N. BURRIESCI, F. CARIATI, G. MICERA, C. GESSA - Clays and Clay Minerals, s,

233 f1980).

12. R. OTTANA', L.M. SAIJA, N. BURRIESCI, N. GIORDAN~ - Zeolites, in press. 13. N. BURRIESCI ET ALTER - Bull. Sot. Min. Cris., 105, 43 (1982). 14. N. BURRIESCI, M. PETRERA, F. CARIATI, R. OTTANA', C. ZIPELLI - To be published.