Accepted Manuscript ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo characterization
Anna Woźniak, Bartosz F. Grześkowiak, Nataliya Babayevska, Tomasz Zalewski, Monika Drobna, Marta Woźniak-Budych, Małgorzata Wiweger, Ryszard Słomski, Stefan Jurga PII: DOI: Reference:
S0928-4931(16)32387-6 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.009 MSC 8158
To appear in:
Materials Science & Engineering C
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
27 November 2016 31 May 2017 8 July 2017
Please cite this article as: Anna Woźniak, Bartosz F. Grześkowiak, Nataliya Babayevska, Tomasz Zalewski, Monika Drobna, Marta Woźniak-Budych, Małgorzata Wiweger, Ryszard Słomski, Stefan Jurga , ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo characterization, Materials Science & Engineering C (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.009
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications: physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo characterization Anna Woźniak1, Bartosz F. Grześkowiak1, Nataliya Babayevska1, Tomasz Zalewski1, Monika Drobna1,2, Marta Woźniak-Budych1, Małgorzata Wiweger3, Ryszard Słomski2,4 and Stefan Jurga1
1
PT
NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznan, Poland, Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Science, Strzeszyńska 32, 60-101 Poznań, Poland
3
International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Ks. Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland
RI
2
4
SC
Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Biocentre, University of Life Sciences, Dojazd11, 60-
632 Poznan, Poland
NU
Corresponding author:
MA
Anna Woźniak, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznan, Poland, email:
[email protected], phone: +48 61 829 67 07, fax +48 61 829 52 91 e-mail address of each author:
D
Anna Woźniak
[email protected]
PT E
Bartosz F Grześkowiak
[email protected] Nataliya Babayevska
[email protected]
CE
Tomasz Zalewski
[email protected]
Monika Drobna
[email protected]
AC
Marta Woźniak-Budych
[email protected] Małgorzata Wiweger
[email protected] Ryszard Słomski
[email protected] Stefan Jurga
[email protected]
number of tables 2 number of figures 13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract The chemical composition of nanoparticles (NPs) may be so designed as to provide measurability for numerous imaging techniques in order to achieve synergistic advantages. Innovative and unique structure of the core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs possesses luminescent and magnetic properties, and is expected that they will become a new generation of contrast agents for Magnetic Resonance
PT
Imaging (MRI) and nanocarriers for theranostics. Thus, by surface biofunctionalization, it is possible to indicate particular nanoparticle compositions which provide efficient imaging, targeted drug delivery,
RI
and biocompatibility.
SC
Novel ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs were synthesized and biofunctionalized by folic acid (FA) and doxorubicin (Doxo) to provide target and anticancer functions. Physicochemical analyses of the
NU
nanoparticles were performed. The biological study included a cytotoxicity in vitro, cellular distribution evaluation, as well as toxicity analyses, performed for the first time, on the in vivo zebrafish (Danio
MA
rerio) model.
Nanoparticles were found to be effective double-function biomarkers (MRI T2 contrast agents,
D
fluorescent imaging). The biological study showed that ZnO@Gd2O3 and ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-
PT E
polySi@FA NPs are biocompatible in a particular concentration ranges. Conjugation with folic acid and/or doxorubicin resulted in effective drug delivery targeting. The in vivo results described the toxicology profile toward the zebrafish embryo/larvae, including new data concerning the survival,
AC
CE
hatching ratio, and developmental malformations.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Graphical abstract
Keywords: ZnO@Gd2O3; core/shell nanoparticles; folic acid; doxorubicin; cytotoxicity; zebrafish.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction Recently, the design, synthesis and characterization of new multifunctional inorganic nanosystems aroused an interest of scientists in the field of biomedicine [1-5]. One of the main directions is to develop material, which combines detection and therapy in a single nanocarrier. The significant advantage of this theranostic approach includes the potential for target drug delivery, the reduction of
PT
side effects, possibility to use sparingly soluble and rapidly degradable drugs, the biodistribution and drug efficacy control, as well as early detection of cancer and monitoring the progress of the therapy.
RI
The nanocarriers used in theranostics must meet some special requirements. First of all, such
SC
carrier should have optical and/or magnetic properties and also be biocompatible and non-toxic. Furthermore, the drugs should be effectively delivered ensured by means of target specific ligand
NU
attachment, and released into the cells. Therefore, finding a novel nanocarrier complying all these requirements became a challenging topic of the last decade.
MA
Inorganic and organic materials (hybrid materials - materials with core-shell structures, inorganic-organic or inorganic-organic composites, materials with high specific surface area - porous
D
materials, nanomaterials) due to their unique properties are upcoming materials for potential application
PT E
in drug and gene delivery/release, photodynamic therapy, bioimaging, sensors, etc [6-9]. Almost all well-known nanomaterials – metallic (Au), carbon-based materials, semiconductors nanoparticles (quantum dots), up-conversional NPs, polymeric and others materials already used for biomedical
CE
purposes [9, 10-12]. The future lays on synthesis modification strategy (bioinspired, bioassisted) [8,13,
AC
14] as well as developing multi-functional, real-time controlled and an externally triggered delivery systems [15, 16, 17].
Although theranostic delivery nanosystems have been proposed before, in present work we decided to develop new nanocarriers based on the core/shell nanoparticles, due to the dual or multifaceted nature of their components. These structures represent a group of nanomaterials with a significant number of potential applications in biomedicine [18,19]. Obtaining nanomaterials which combine two or more functions (e.g. multimodal imaging, targeted drug delivery) into one system is still a complex and difficult task. Therefore, there are some main approaches to solving this issue. Firstly,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the search for single-phase multifunctional nanomaterials which already exhibit desirable properties; the second approach focuses on the formation of nanomaterials, doped with impurities, where impurities equip the material with specific properties; and the third approach aims at designing some materials with core/shell structures [ 20,21]. Varying the core and shell parameters (core shape and size, and shell thickness), as well as their properties (e.g. magnetic, optical), allow to develop of a new multimodal
PT
imaging nanosystem for an extensive, both scientific and biomedical, application [22,23]. Consequently, for the purpose of this study, a luminescent-magnetic nanocomposite was
RI
synthetized, based on two independent oxide phases – biocompatible, resistant to photo-bleaching and
SC
non-toxic ZnO matrix with green emissions and Gd2O3, which possesses magnetic properties. This approach generates significant advantages. The emission of ZnO nanocrystals at two different
NU
wavelengths is very important for integrated biological fluorescence labelling. Gadolinium properties resulting in an efficient shortening of the longitudinal relaxation time and in the increasing magnetic
MA
resonance signal intensity [ 24]. To reduce observed toxicity of the gadolinium ions in chelates [25], Gd ions were designed in the form of a shell, which is enough to obtain a better contrast in the MRI
D
experiment.
PT E
Neither ZnO nor Gd2O3 are stable in water. At the same time, their surface can be easily modified by several functional groups, like COO, NH2 [26]. Surface functionalization may provide new chemical and physical properties, or change those already known; it also reduces the nanoparticles
CE
agglomeration, increases their stability in aqueous, saline or medium solutions, and most importantly
AC
for the biomedicine purposes, allows targeting agents to be attached. Various strategies, using organic ligands, an inorganic shell or polymer coupling agents, have been developed to stabilize and disperse nanoparticles in an organic or aqueous media. Oleic acid is a well-known coupling agent, which prevents the nanoparticle agglomeration in organic media [27]. One of the popular methods of stabilizing nanoparticles in water is the method based on SiO2 compounds [28]. We proposed functionalization by organosiloxanes as a good alternative to well-known SiO2-based methods for nanoparticle stabilization. The stepwise functionalization of the nanoparticles' surface improves the compatibility between
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT inorganic nanoparticles and the organic matrix. Functionalized oxide nanoparticles (including ZnO and Gd2O3), stable in aqueous media were obtained by the other groups [26,29,30]. To target nanoparticles toward cancer cells, many ligands were investigated and of these, folic acid is the most common one. FA is essential in living organisms during the processes of cell division and growth, as well as in DNA repair processes. Many cancer cells overexpressed the folic acid receptor
PT
on the cell membrane surface to ensure intensified growth. This phenomenon may be used as a key factor for targeting nanoparticles. In present article, we proposed biofunctionalization of the newly
RI
designed ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanostructures by the targeting (folic acid) and chemotherapeutic
SC
agents (model anticancer drug: doxorubicin), which is achieved through amino groups (basically from aminosiloxanes). Thus, attractive physical interactions allow to obtain a new generation of nanocarriers
NU
for multimodal imaging and for targeted drug delivery.
The goal of the study was to characterize the physicochemical properties of the new core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA
MA
ZnO@Gd2O3,
and
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo,
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo nanoparticles, cytotoxicity studies at the in vitro (HeLa, KB,
D
MSU-1.1 cell lines) and in vivo levels (zebrafish, Danio rerio). The ZnO@Gd2O3 and doped ZnO:Er3+-
PT E
Yb3+@Gd2O3 nanostructures have been obtained in our group before [31,32]. The present study was assumed to be the first which describes the biomedical applications, as well as in vitro and in vivo
CE
studies, of the functionalized core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3 nanostructures.
AC
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
To synthesize ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles, zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2×2H2O, Sigma-Aldrich),
sodium
hydroxide
(NaOH,
Stanlab),
gadolinium(III)
nitrate
hexahydrate
(Gd(NO3)3×6H2O, 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) and methanol were used as starting materials. For ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs surface modification, oleic acid (OA, Sigma-Aldrich), tetramethylammonium hydroxide
(TMAH,
Sigma-Aldrich),
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT N-(2-aminoethyl)aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (AEAPS, Sigma-Aldrich), toluene, ethanol, methanol, N-hydroxysuccinimide
(NHS,
98%),
N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodimide hydrochloride (EDC, 98%), folic acid (≥97%) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 99.2%) were used. All chemicals were of analytical grade and were used
2.2. Synthesis of core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles
PT
without any further purification.
RI
The synthesis of ZnO@Gd2O3 nanoparticles consists of two stages. The core preparation
SC
involves adapted synthesis of ZnO NPs via the simple low-temperature sol-gel route based on the study of W. Beek et al. [33]. Zn(CH3COO)2×2H2O) (13.4 mmol) was dissolved in 125 ml methanol at a
NU
constant temperature of 60 °C. Next, a solution of NaOH (23 mmol) in 65 ml of methanol was added dropwise to zinc acetate dihydrate in methanol under vigorous stirring. After approx. 3 hours, a white
MA
precipitate of ZnO nanoparticles was separated from the mother liquor, washed with methanol twice and dried at room temperature (RT).
D
The Gd2O3 shell was prepared by the “seed deposition method” described in Y. D. Han et al.
PT E
[34]. A 300 mg of the ZnO@Gd2O3 nanoparticles were immersed in a 0.1 mol/l Gd(NO3)3 water solution for 96 h. The core-shell nanostructures obtained were separated, washed with deionized water (18 MΩ·cm) and dried in an excicator. To reach gadolinium oxide phase, (Gd2O3), nanoparticles were
AC
CE
annealed at 900 °C in air for 1h.
2.3. Functionalization of ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles by oleic acid and aminosiloxanes
The ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles were fractionated by centrifugation to obtain particles with a size up to 50 nm. For functionalization of ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs by OA, OA (0.22 mmol) was added to ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs in ethanol (20 ml) under vigorous stirring. The mixture was heated to reflux, then TMAH was dissolved in refluxing ethanol (5 ml) and rapidly injected into a flask containing ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles and OA. After several minutes, the mixture was diluted with
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ethanol (50 ml) and cooled down to 0 °C in an ice bath. The resulting solution was centrifuged, and washed several times with ethanol. Since the oleate-capped ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs obtained are not dissolvable in ethanol, the precipitate was finally dispersed in 10 ml of toluene, leading to a clear oleatecapped ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell NPs dispersion. Then 1 ml of AEAPS in toluene (0.1 M) was mixed with ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell NPs in toluene (10 ml) under stirring at RT. After 5 min., 1 ml of TMAH
PT
in ethanol (0.2 M) was added and the temperature was set at 85 °C for 45 min. After removal of the supernatant, the precipitate was washed with toluene, acetone and distilled water, and subsequently dried
SC
RI
at 60 °C.
2.4. Biofunctionalization of ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi core/shell nanoparticles by folic acid and
NU
doxorubicin
For biofunctionalization of ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi core/shell nanoparticles by folic acid, 10
MA
mg of FA were dissolved in 2 ml DMSO under vigorous stirring at RT. After full dissolution, 10 mg of NHS and 10 mg of EDS were added to the FA solution. After stirring for 15 min., ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-
D
polySi NPs (10 mg) were added to the mixture and maintained overnight. After that, the precipitate was
PT E
washed with DMSO and distilled water, and then dried at 60 °C. For biofunctionalization of ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi nanoparticles by doxorubicin, 5 ml of doxorubicin in water (0.7 mg/ml) were added to 10 mg ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell NPs on a magnetic stirrer
CE
and maintained at RT overnight. For double biofunctionalization by both FA and doxorubicin, NPs with
AC
FA were immersed in the solution with doxorubicin and were prepared as described above. The detailed schematic diagram of functionalized and biofunctionalized (example - FA-capped NPs) ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs is presented in figure 1.
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
NU
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the obtaining functionalized ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs. Due to the silanization process, Zn2+ added to the trimethoxysilane group of AEAPS, where the
MA
Zn–O–Si groups are covalent bonded with ZnO surfaces. During the silanization process, TMAH was added to initiate nanoparticle surface functionalization. Then the γ-carboxyl group of FA was activated
D
by EDC and conjugated onto a ZnO surface through reactions between FA and amine groups (from
PT E
AEAPS) to produce the final stable ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA nanostructures. For the sake of convenience, we refer throughout this article to the nanoparticles studied as:
CE
sample A (as-obtained ZnO NPs, synthesis at 60 °C), sample B (ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 for 96 h and annealed at 900 °C for 1 h), sample C (ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 for 96 h and annealed at 900
AC
°C for 1 h and capped by OA and polysiloxanes), sample D (ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 for 96 h and annealed at 900 °C for 1 h and capped by OA and polysiloxanes and FA), sample E (ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 for 96 h and annealed at 900 °C for 1 h and capped by OA and polysiloxanes and Doxo), and sample F (ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 for 96 h and annealed at 900 °C for 1 h and capped by OA and polysiloxanes, FA and Doxo).
2.5. Physicochemical characterization
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Various instruments were employed to characterize the functionalized ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs. The size of the nanoparticles obtained was studied with the method of Small Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) using an Empyrean PANalytical diffractometer. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies of the powder samples were carried out on an Empyrean (PANalytical) diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.54 Å), a reflection-transmission spinner (the sample stage) and a PIXcel 3D detector operating in Bragg–
PT
Brentano geometry. Scans were recorded at RT (300 K) at angles ranging from 20 to 80 (°2Theta) with a step size of 0.006, and in the continuous-scan mode. In order to examine the stability of nanoparticles,
RI
the relationship of the hydrodynamic size of nanoparticles to their electrokinetic potential was measured
SC
by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). The molecular size and zeta (ζ) potential of the nanoparticles were determined using a Zetasizer Nano (Malvern). All measurements were performed at 25 °C and were
NU
done in triplicate. The Gd-layer formation, and FA and Doxo bonding were recognized by means of the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra on a Tensor 27 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen,
MA
Germany) equipped with a global source and an MCT detector in the range of 4500∼400 cm−1, using the KBr pellet method. The UV–Vis absorption data were recorded using a UV/Vis spectrometer and
PT E
D
by dispersing the nanoparticles in water.
2.6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2-weighted
magnetic resonance images (MRI) were generated using a 9.4 Tesla MRI
CE
horizontal scanner (Agilent) with the volume RF Milipede coil (40 mm). The resolution was
AC
0.112x0.112x2 mm3. Prior to imaging, the experiment samples with different concentrations of nanoparticles were placed in a specially designed holder. Moreover, a reference specimen with solvent (water) was placed in the central part of holder. The measurements were performed at 16 oC. In the experiment, a spin echo CPMG sequence was used with TE=10-320 ms and TR=15 000 ms and with the number of echoes set to 32.
2.7. Cell culture
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The examinations were conducted on HeLa (cervical cancer, ATCC CCL-2), KB (epidermal carcinoma ATCC® CCL-17™) and MSU-1.1 (normal human fibroblasts, kindly provided by Prof. C. Kieda - CBM, CNRS, Orléans, France) cell lines. The cells were cultured in a complete medium composed of the basal medium (DMEM - Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium, Sigma-Aldrich - for HeLa and MSU-1.1 cells; EMEM - Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium, Sigma-Aldrich – for KB cells),
PT
10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% antibiotics (penicillin 100µl/ml, streptomycin 100 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were maintained under sterile conditions and incubated at 37 °C
SC
evaluated using an inverted microscope (Leica DMIL LED).
RI
in a humidified atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2. The cell morphology and confluence were
NU
2.8. Cytotoxicity assays
To assess cell viability in response to sample B (ZnO@Gd2O3), sample D (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-
MA
polySi@FA), sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo) and sample F (ZnO@Gd2O3@OApolySi@FA@Doxo) nanoparticles, the cytotoxicity in various cell types was determined by the WST-1
D
Cell Proliferation Assay (Clontech). This test is based on the enzymatic cleavage of the tetrazolium salt
PT E
WST-1 to a water-soluble formazan dye, which may be quantified by absorbance (wavelength of λ~420480 nm) by living cells. When the cell cultures reached the appropriate confluence, the cells were trypsinized and seeded in microtiter plates (tissue culture grade, 96 wells, flat bottom). All cell lines
CE
were seeded at a density of 2.5x104 cells per well. After 24 hours, the cell culture medium was removed,
AC
fresh media containing the increased concentrations of samples B, D, E, F were added to each well (1, 6, 8, 16, 32, 100, 300 µg/ml in complete medium), and then the cells were incubated for another 24 and 48 h. After incubation, 10 µl of the WST-1 Cell Proliferation Reagent was added to each well and incubated for 2-4 hours. Then, absorbance at wavelength of λ~450 nm (the reference λ~620 nm) was recorded against the background control with the use of a multiwell plate reader (Zenyth, Biochrom). All experiments were carried out in duplicate. For each experiment, the untreated cells served as a negative control, and the cells incubated with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide – DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) served as a positive control. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2.9. Confocal bioimaging The cellular distribution, targeting of the nanoparticles and the doxorubicin release in the cells were all performed using fluorescent staining with a cell membrane dye concanavalin A (Molecular Probes, 100 µg/ml), the luminescence of core/shell nanoparticles and doxorubicin autofluorescence. All
PT
the cell lines were seeded at a density of 105 cells/ml in a Lab-Tek™ 8 Chamber Slide. After one day, samples B, D, E, F (concentration of 300 µg/ml) were added. After 24, 48 and 72 h of incubation, the
RI
medium with nanoparticles was discarded and the cells were washed, fixed (4% paraformaldehyde,
SC
0.2% Triton X-100, Sigma-Aldrich) and stained with concanavalin A. This dye shows the emission maximum at a wavelength of λ~668 nm, whereas the nanoparticle luminescence/fluorescence and the emission at wavelength of λ~520 nm and λ~560 nm,
NU
doxorubicin autofluorescence show the
2.10.
MA
respectively. Confocal imaging was performed with a Leica TCS SP5 system.
Toxicity in vivo
D
The in vivo analyses were performed on the embryonic zebrafish (Danio rerio) animal model.
PT E
For the provision of embryos, the adult zebrafish (the ABxTL wild type strain) were kept in aquaria with a light/dark cycle of 14 h/10 h at the International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw. The fish were allowed to breed naturally and the eggs were collected in plastic egg chambers,
AC
cleaned, sor
CE
approximately 1 h post fertilization (hpf). Any unfertilized embryos were removed, the eggs were then
culture dishes using a plastic pipette. At all stages, the developing embryos were maintained at 28 °C in an aqueous E3 medium. The zebrafish embryos were then exposed for 96 h to three different concentrations (10, 50, 100 µg/ml) of the nanoparticle samples being analysed (B, D, E). During the exposure period (after 24 h and 48 h), photographs of the embryos were captured under a stereomicroscope in order to estimate the percentage of surviving embryos, as well as their morphological changes. The embryos were also observed to estimate the hatching rate every 24 h.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.
Results and discussion
3.1. Morphology and structure characterization. ZnO@Gd2O3 (non-functionalized) core/shell nanoparticles were obtained and characterized earlier by Babayevska et al. [31]. Previously obtained results showed that the core, as-obtained ZnO
PT
NPs (sample A) are highly crystalline and have a hexagonal wurtzite ZnO structure. Following ZnO surface modification by the Gd2O3 shell (sample B), the diffraction pattern consists of two sets of lines
RI
– the hexagonal wurtzite ZnO structure and new peaks corresponding to (222) and (400) planes of the
SC
cubic Gd2O3 phase (figure S1). ZnO NPs have a uniform spherical shape, are highly crystalline and monodispersed with a mean size of about 7 nm. After covering ZnO NPs with a Gd 2O3 layer, the
NU
resulting ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs are polydispersed with the core/shell structure and have a mean size range of 30-100 nm. It was shown that the Gd2O3 shell thickness of these nanoparticles (with the core size of
MA
approx. 70 nm) is about 4 nm (sample B) [31]. These ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell NPs are too large for in vitro/in vivo measurements. Therefore for any future functionalization, the
D
fractionated by centrifugation.
core/shell NPs were
PT E
The luminescent characteristics of these ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell NPs were studied earlier by Babayevska et al. [31]. ZnO NPs (core) have intensive green luminescence. After covering the ZnO NPs surface with a Gd2O3 shell, luminescence intensity decreases. The relative quantum yield (QY) was
CE
calculated according to Sun et al., [35]. The QY of the as-obtained ZnO NPs is about 20%, after Gd2O3
AC
ZnO (NPs surface modification 96 h) QY in green emissions is about 8%. The organic shell does not affect the luminescent efficiency of the whole system. Despite the fact that the QY is not high, it is enough to use ZnO NPs as fluorescent markers and we can see this in our experiments, presented below. The average sizes of the ZnO NPs; ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3; ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 and capped by OA and polysiloxanes; ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 and capped by OA, polysiloxanes and FA; ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 and capped by OA, polysiloxanes and Doxo; ZnO NPs, modified by Gd2O3 and capped by OA, polysiloxanes, FA and Doxo, based on small angle X-ray scattering
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (SAXS), are given in table 1. From these results it is clear that the particle size increased upon coating with (poly)aminosiloxanes, oleic and folic acids.
Table 1. The size of nanoparticles estimated using SAXS. Sample Diameter
sample A
sample B
10.4±1.1
40.2±3.4
sample C 43.0±3.5
sample D
sample E
sample F
46.4±4.2
46.6±3.2
42.8±4.3
RI
PT
(nm)
SC
3.2. Functionalization and biofunctionalization of ZnO@Gd2O3 nanoparticles To provide water stability and to follow drug targeting, ZnO@Gd2O3 nanoparticles were firstly
NU
functionalized by oleic acid and aminosiloxanes, and then biofunctionalized by folic acid and
AC
CE
PT E
D
the FT-IR spectra of samples A, B, C.
MA
doxorubicin. Confirmation of the particle surface modification was attained via FT-IR. Figure 2 presents
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of sample A (ZnO NPs), sample B (ZnO@Gd2O3) and sample C (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA@polySi).
In figure 2, the broad band centred at about 3315 cm-1 is assigned to the O–H stretching mode of the surface hydroxyl groups for all the samples studied. These peaks may also be attributed to the
PT
HO-ZnO hydroxyl species formed via the dissociative adsorption of water with ZnO NPs, and probably to the water molecules adsorbed on the surface of nanoparticles. The IR absorption peaks found at 457
RI
cm-1 and 680 cm-1 are attributed to Zn-O. Two sharp peaks are located at 1585 cm-1 and 1400 cm-1,
SC
which are characteristic of the COO and COO-Zn stretching vibrations (samples A,B). The new small additional peak at 547 cm-1 corresponds to a typical Gd=O vibration from the
NU
Gd2O3 layer (sample B). The Zn-O stretching mode vibration shifted to a lower frequency (peak at 420 cm-1), which indicates the existence of the Gd2O3 shell on ZnO NPs' surface.
MA
Following ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs surface modification by oleic acid and (poly)aminosiloxanes – TMAH and AEAPS (sample C), the spectrum at 3702-3047 cm-1 range is broader than that presented on
D
the graph for samples A, B. This broad adsorption band besides HO-ZnO and adsorbed H2O may consist
PT E
of the N-H stretching vibration of amino groups presented in the ligand. The two peaks located at 2932 and 2877 cm-1 are due to the symmetric and asymmetric C–H stretching vibrations of the CH2 groups from oleic acid. Two small peaks, located at 1585 cm-1 and 1400 cm-1 and corresponding to the COO
CE
and COO-Zn stretching vibrations, are smaller. The sharp peak at 1483 cm-1 is also attributed to the N-
AC
H stretching vibration from the amino groups. It was also found that the FT-IR spectra of ZnO exhibit absorptions at 1007 cm-1 and 948, which could be ascribed respectively to the characteristic peaks of the Si–O–Si and Zn–O–Si symmetrical stretching vibrations. These peaks indicate that ZnO is bonded to the aminosiloxanes ligands through covalent chemical bonds.
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of sample D (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA), sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-
PT E
D
polySi@Doxo) and sample F (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo).
Following ZnO@Gd2O3@OA@polySi NPs surface modification by folic acid, the white powder of ZnO changes colour to yellow. In figure 3 (sample D), there are small peaks at 1616 cm-1 and
CE
1520 cm-1 corresponding to the C=O groups from folic acid. The Doxo modified nanoparticles were also confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy (figure 4). Despite the fact that the nanoparticles were intensely purple
AC
following functionalization by doxorubicin, the FT-IR peaks are weak. The bands at 1724 cm-1, 1611 cm-1, and a small peak at 761 cm-1 are referred to as the stretching vibration of two carbonyl groups of the anthracene ring of doxorubicin. Following double functionalization by FA and Doxo, we may see peaks from the COO- and COO-Zn stretching vibrations.
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MA
Figure 4. Adsorption of FA (sample D) and Doxo (sample E) on ZnO@Gd2O3@OA@polySi core/shell NPs surface at RT.
D
The Doxo loading is due to electrostatic forces. In order to investigate the nature of these
PT E
electrostatic interactions, zeta potential measurements were performed (table 2). The zeta potential measurements for pure Doxo at pH around 7 were also performed to analyse the influence of electrostatic
CE
interactions between Doxo molecules and ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi nanoparticles during the adsorption process. The electrokinetic potential of Doxo at neutral pH is close to isoelectric points (-1.99mV),
AC
which means that doxorubicin molecules have a slight negative charge on the surface. The mechanism of doxorubicin adsorption is not mainly attributed to the electrostatic interactions. However, positively charged nanoparticles can involve hydrogen bonding and facilitate the adhesion on the surface [36,37]. Table 2. Zeta potential of nanoparticles. Sample
Zeta potential (mV)
sample A
33.9±1.4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18.5±0.8
sample C
25.7±1.2
sample D
28,7±1.6
sample E
-40.7±2.3
sample F
-12.7±0.82
PT
sample B
RI
The stability of nanoparticles is one of the critical aspects in ensuring safety of nanomaterials. It should be pointed out that formation of aggregates with a size larger than 5µm may lead to capillary
SC
blockade and embolism [38]. Thus, the particle size, size distribution and electrokinetic potential of
NU
nanomaterials should be carefully monitored to evaluate the physical stability of nanoparticles. The core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3, ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA, ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo and
MA
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo nanoparticles were characterized by DLS in terms of zeta potential, particles size and polydispersity index (PDI). The nanoparticles dimensions monitored by DLS over time showed that all core/shell nanoparticles are in the nanoscale range in the first 24 h (figure
D
5a). A significant aggregation of unmodified ZnO@Gd2O3 NPs, ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi and
PT E
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo NPs began after 24 h incubation, leading to an increase in particle size to 500-600 nm and PDI. After 72h, all nanostructures formed large clusters with particle
CE
size reaching micrometer scale, probably due to their lower value of zeta potential. Figure 5b shows the zeta potential profile of nanoparticles versus time. Except for ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo
AC
NPs, the zeta potential of all nanoparticles decreased with the time of experiments, resulting in a high sticking efficiency between nanosurfaces (aggregation). This is in agreement with the general literature that an decrease in zeta potential leads to a decrease in the physical stability of nanomaterials [39]. From this result it can be seen that the highest stability of nanoparticles was observed in the first 24 h. It could be concluded that the dispersion stability of loaded by drug nanoparticles remains a very challenging issue. It depends on various parameters, such as surface properties of nanomaterials, their concentration in aqueous media, pH and adsorption of molecules on their surface.
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
Figure 5. The average size (a) and the absolute value of zeta potential (b) of nanoparticles in water as
NU
function of time during stability study.
The UV-Vis spectroscopy was used as an additional method which confirms
surface
MA
functionalization and determines the amount of FA and Doxo adsorbed on the core/shell nanosurface. Figure 4 presents the adsorption of FA and Doxo on the ZnO@Gd2O3@OA@polySi NPs surface at
D
RT.
PT E
As can be seen after approximately 15 minutes of the functionalization process, more than 16% (1.62 mg on 10 mg NPs) of FA was adsorbed. In the case of Doxo adsorption, the adsorption efficiency
CE
was around 42% (74.1 mg on 10 mg NPs) after 15 min. of the functionalization. The adsorbed amount of FA and Doxo during the 24 h period was virtually unchanged. The adsorption of folic acid and
AC
doxorubicine on ZnO@Gd2O3@OA@polySi NPs surface is related to the conjugation of the carboxylic groups of FA and Doxo to the amine groups on the nanoparticle surface modified by (poly)aminosiloxanes.
3.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging To validate our assumption about the efficiency of our particles as MRI contrast agents, magnetic resonance images were collected. The six samples of different nanoparticles concentration in water were located: 0 mM – tube 1, 0.35 mM – tube 2, 0.17 mM – tube 3, 0.08 mM – tube 4, 0.04 mM
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT – tube 5, 0.02 mM– tube 6. The suspension in the central tube (1) is brighter in all T 2-weighted images (TE=20 ms, TE= 180 ms, TE= 320 ms) than in the remaining tubes (2-6). The NMR signal disappears faster in the tubes with a higher concentration of nanoparticles (Video Still 1). This property corresponds with the T2 time value, which is shortest for tube 6. These results confirm the efficiency of the nanoparticles which were prepared in enhancing the negative contrast in the magnetic resonance
NU
SC
RI
PT
imaging experiments.
MA
Figure 6. MRI T2-weighted images in tubes 1-6 with different concentrations of sample B
D
(ZnO@Gd2O3) in water.
PT E
3.4 In vitro Cytotoxicity
The cellular toxicity analysis was based on the WST-1 assay dedicated to assessing the viability
CE
of the cells being examined. Obtained OD results at wavelength of λ~450 nm may be evaluated as a percentage of the cell viability compared to the control [40]. To assess the effect of nanoparticles on cell
AC
viability, a wide spectrum of particle concentrations was examined at two time intervals. After 24 h of HeLa cell incubation with sample B, the average cell viability was concentrationdependent with the lowest value at 300 µg/ml. The incubation with sample D resulted in an average survival rate of 64% (figure S2a). Cell viability after incubation with sample E was stable, but decreased dramatically at the highest concentration (300 µg/ml – 1.6%). During incubation with sample F, the cells expressed an increased cytotoxic effect in the three highest concentrations (64, 100 and 300 µg/ml) (figure 7a). The HeLa cells showed a very high viability profile after 48 h of incubation with samples B and D, except for the highest concentration (300 µg/ml) (figure S2b). A weak ability to reduce WST-1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT salt was observed after incubation with sample E in concentrations of 100 and 300 µg/ml. After
NU
SC
RI
PT
incubation with sample F, cytotoxicity was observed at a dose as low as 32 µg/ml (figure 7b).
Figure 7. HeLa cells viability after (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h of incubation with sample E
MA
(ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo) and sample F (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo).
D
The KB cells after 24 h showed an average viability 107% after sample B exposure. During
PT E
incubation with sample D, the cells expressed an increased cytotoxic effect in the two highest concentrations (100 and 300 µg/ml) (figure S3a). After 48 h incubation, the same cellular reaction was
CE
detected (figure S3b). The lowest viability was 2.89% and was observed as a result of the incubation with 300 µg/ml of sample E. A similar response was observed after incubation with sample F. The trend
AC
for the cell viability described above was also detected after 48 h of incubation with the nanoparticles analysed (figures 8a,b).
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 8. KB cell viability after (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h incubation with sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-
NU
polySi@Doxo) and sample F (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo).
MA
During the 24 h incubation of samples B, D (figure S4a), and E, F (figure 9a), in the case of the MSU-1.1 cells, the viability was stable with increasing cytotoxicity in a concentration of 300 µg/ml. A
AC
CE
PT E
D
lethal effect at this dose was observed after 48 h (figures S4b, 9b).
Figure 9. MSU-1.1 cells viability after (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h incubation with sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo) and sample F (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The in vitro study showed the cytotoxic profile of the B, D, E, F samples. To assess the cytotoxicity of the new materials, it is important to start with the basic ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell NPs. This in vitro study confirmed that these nanoparticles (10-50 nm) are highly biocompatible in the range of concentrations (1-300 µg/ml) analysed, and thus may be used as a basic nanostructure for multimodal nanocarriers. Our investigations are in agreement with the observations of other authors that Gd-doped
PT
ZnO nanoparticles used for labelling HeLa cells have no cytotoxic effect, even in concentrations as high as 1 mM [41].
RI
The ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell structure was biofunctionalized with folic acid in order to target the
SC
tested nanoparticles to the cancer cells analysed. HeLa and KB cells overexpress the folic acid receptor at a very high level, but an enhanced nanoparticle cellular uptake caused no reduction in viability within
NU
the 1-100 µg/ml range of concentrations. Other data also suggest that folate-coated ZnO nanoparticles doped with rare metals (i.e. Gd, Yb) have no effect on cell viability [42].
MA
A correlation analysis of the absorption and the amount of doxorubicin showed that concentrations of 100 and 300 µg/ml should be the most efficient, since they contain an effective dose
D
of doxorubicin at the in vitro level. Its effect is reflected in the cellular response observed (figures 7,8).
PT E
These data correspond to our previous results concerning cytotoxicity and the drug-loading profile of magnetite@polydopamine@doxorubicin NPs [43]. The differences between the cellular responses of cancer cells were connected with their different sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic agent [44].
CE
The most visible effect of the improved cellular uptake was observed after the incubation of
AC
sample F with the HeLa cells. The reduction in cell viability was four times greater compared with the effect of sample E. These study results indicate that the nanoparticles tested are efficient in the targeted drug delivery system.
3.5. Confocal bioimaging The incubation of the cells with sample B resulted in the fluorescence of the nanoparticles being observed within the cell interior. The microscopic study of sample D confirmed the targeting process in these cells, observed with a very high intensity in the cancer HeLa and KB cells, due to the preferential
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT binding of folic acid to the overexpressed surface receptors (figure S5). The lowest nanoparticle specific fluorescence signals were detected in the case of sample D following incubation with the MSU-1.1 cells. Confocal observations of sample E established an effective drug delivery using nanoparticles. The nucleus/cytoplasm doxorubicin release process was observed as early as the first day. Microscopic
PT
analyses of sample F confirmed the these results (figure 10). Please note, that on figure 10b and 10c the red autofluorescence of doxorubicin and artificial green colour of membrane 647 nm dye are presented.
RI
This approach has allowed us to show indirect evidence for samples E and F cellular distribution. It
SC
was not our intention to distinguish florescence signal from the NPs and cell membrane.
PT E
D
MA
NU
The Z-stack mode performed in all cases confirmed the internalization process (Video Still 2).
Figure 10. Image of HeLa cells after 24 h incubation with (a) - sample B (ZnO@Gd2O3), violet colour
CE
(concanavalin A) - cell membrane, green colour – nanoparticle luminescence; (b) - sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo), green colour (concanavalin A) - cell membrane, red colour –
AC
doxorubicin; (c) - sample F (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo), green colour (concanavalin A) cell membrane, red colour – doxorubicin. Magnification 63x, confocal microscope Leica TCS SP5.
The literature on the subject includes many scientific reports concerning cytotoxicity and biological imaging based on ZnO nanocrystals doped with Co, Cu, Ni, Au, Gd, the Fe3O4 core/shell, ZnO nanowires targeted to integrin αvβ3, ZnO QDs coated with folate-conjugated chitosan loaded with doxorubicin, ZnO@Gd@Doxo and folate-coated ZnO doped with rare metals [41,42,45-50]. This report
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT is assumed to be the first describing the cytotoxicity profile and cellular imaging of core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3,
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA,
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo
and
ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA@Doxo NPs toward HeLa, KB, MSU-1.1 cells.
PT
3.6. In vivo Toxicity At present, the zebrafish appears to be a promising in vivo vertebrate model for
RI
nanotoxicological studies. The most important characteristics of this laboratory animal include its small
SC
size, rapid development, short life cycle, optical transparency, high level of genetic homology to humans and low culture cost [51]. A wide spectrum of nanomaterials (metallic, magnetic, polymeric, carbon and
NU
QD) has been examined in terms of in vivo toxicity using the Danio rerio model [52-57]. Our studies included both embryo survival and hatching rates, as well as the malformation analyses of zebrafish
MA
embryos after incubation with samples B, D and E. The embryos were not exposed to full range of concentrations (1-300 µg/ml). A close study of literature revealed that nanoparticles concentrations of
D
50 and 100 mg/l were the lethal doses for zebrafish embryos [58] and we didn’t want to exceed these
PT E
values. Based on the results from the in vitro study, we have shortlisted 3 samples (B, D, E) and used these in in vivo tests. Samples E and F were similar in their action on cancer cells but sample E was slightly more toxic to normal cells than sample F. In order to cover full range with least number of
CE
samples we have decided to omit sample F from further analysis. Although toxicity testing on zebrafish
AC
younger than 120 hpf is not considered as an animal testing (Directive 2010/63/UE and Polish ACT of 15 January 2015 on protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes) we feel obliged to limit the number of embryos/larvae that need to be sacrificed in experiments.
3.6.1 Survival and hatching rate. The embryo survival rates were evaluated after 24 and 48 h of incubation with the nanoparticles being tested. Microscopic observations showed embryo survival rates approx. 90-100% after incubation with samples B, D and E in concentrations of 10, 50, 100 µg/ml and at time intervals (24, 48 h) (figure
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11a). This may be connected with the function of chorion, i.e. the three-layered outer membrane surrounding and protecting the embryo [59]. On the other hand, some research papers describe the ability of very small Ag nanoparticles (11.3 nm) to pass through the chorion pores [60]. Bai et al. described the toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in concentrations of 50 and 100 mg/L as the lethal dose [58]. For Fe2O3 the survival rate was dose- and time-dependent [61].
PT
The nanoparticles affected the hatching rate of the zebrafish embryos. The hatching time for the control began between 48 and 72 hpf. Exposure of embryos to sample B at 100 µg/ml resulted in no
RI
hatching being observed even at 96 hpf. The same type of nanoparticles at 50 µg/ml reduced the hatching
SC
rate at 96 hpf, whereas at a lower concentration (10 µg/ml), the hatching occurred earlier than in the control. During incubation with sample D, the dose of 10 µg/ml has no negative effect on the hatching
NU
ratio, whereas the concentration of 50 µg/ml reduced the rate after 72 and 96 hpf. The concentration of 100 µg/ml after 72 and 96 hpf inhibited totally the hatching process. Sample E reduced the hatching
MA
after 96 h for the concentrations of 50 and 100 µg/ml (figure 11b) and as was the case with sample B, stimulated hatching at 10 µg/ml. Retarded embryo hatching after exposure to ZnO, Ag, Au, Pt, TiO2 and
D
Si nanoparticles was also described by other authors [60,62,63]. On the other hand, Samaee et al. showed
PT E
the premature hatching time and decrease in time required for normal hatching after incubation with TiO2 NPs in a dose-dependent manner [64]. Zhou et al. investigated the effect of surface chemical properties on the toxicity of 17 types of ZnO nanoparticles to the embryonic zebrafish and declared that
AC
CE
it may increase the toxic impact [65].
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
D
Figure 11. Embryo survival (a) and hatching rates (b) after incubation with sample B (ZnO@Gd2O3),
PT E
sample D (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA) and sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo).
CE
3.6.2 Developmental abnormalities.
As shown in figures 12 and 13, as a result of 48 h exposure to samples B, D and E, embryos
AC
failed to develop the normal morphology. The most typical malformations at 48 hpf initiated after exposure to sample B were a bent trunk and tail malformation. Contact of the embryos with sample D resulted in yolk sac oedema and pericardial oedema. Pericardial oedema, yolk sac oedema and bent trunk were the most frequent abnormalities of embryos following incubation with sample E. Toxic actions of sample E were expected due to the interactions with the DNA double helix and confirmed other authors’ findings concerning the cardiotoxicity of drug analysed [66,67]. All types of malformations were dose-dependent. No correlation between the premature hatching observed for samples B, D and E at a low concentration and malformations was detected.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Figure 12. Malformations of zebrafish embryos exposed for 48 h to (a) sample B ( ZnO@Gd2O3), (b)
MA
NU
SC
RI
sample D (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA), (c) sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo).
D
Figure 13. Malformations of zebrafish embryos exposed for 48 h to (a) sample E (ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-
PT E
polySi@Doxo) (50 µg/ml), (b) sample B (ZnO@Gd2O3) (100 µg/ml), (c) - aqueous solution of E3 salt.
CE
The results of the present study remain in agreement with the observations reported by other authors on the effect of bare nanoparticles on the malformation development. The data concerning the
AC
toxicity of SiNPs described such abnormalities as pericardial oedema, yolk sac oedema, as well as tail and head malformations [68]. The toxicity assessments of the near-infrared up conversion luminescent LaF3:Yb,Er injected through the chorion into the early developed zebrafish embryos showed some abnormalities, including a non-depleted or malformed yolk, spinal and tail malformations, pericardial sac or yolk formations, stunted body or eye growth, as well as pericardial or yolk sac oedema [51]. The results obtained in this paper indicate that all three types of nanoparticles tested have a slight effect on the survival rates, and influence the hatching rate, as well as being the cause of the embryo malformations. Literature sources describe three mechanisms for the toxic effect of different
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT nanoparticle types (Fe2O3, carbon nanotubes, TiO2, ZnO). The first mechanism involved aggregation and sedimentation on the chorion surface and changes in the mechanical properties of the membrane, as well as the effect on chorionic hatching enzymes [69]. The second approach concerned interference with the nutrient exchange between the embryos and the environment [70]. The third strategy was related to the toxic effect of the metal ions released from the nanoparticles and the induction of DNA damage, as
PT
well as the generation of reactive oxidative species ROS [71,72]. As far as the authors of the present study are aware, there are no data concerning the influence
RI
of the core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3, ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@FA, ZnO@Gd2O3@OA-polySi@Doxo
SC
nanoparticles on the zebrafish embryo development. In vivo nanotoxicity studies provided the survival and hatching rates, as well as the developmental abnormalities. These data are regarded as highly
NU
informative, since zebrafish share many physiological characteristics with higher vertebrates; thus, the toxicological results obtained in this study may be compared with those of studies on the developmental
MA
toxicity in mammals [61]. The in vitro-in vivo correlation of the recorded results is moderate. Due to the much more complex animal response (biodistribution, degradability), in vivo nanotoxicity cannot be
3.
PT E
D
properly addressed using in vitro experimental systems [64].
Conclusions
CE
Physicochemical analyses showed the excellent potential applicability of the newly produced
AC
core/shell ZnO@Gd2O3 nanoparticles as effective and efficient novel double-function T2 contrast agents for the magnetic resonance, as well as for fluorescent imaging. Biological studies based on the in vitro cytotoxicity profile lead to the conclusion that samples B and D are biocompatible within a particular concentration ranges. ZnO@Gd2O3 nanoparticles with biofunctionalized agents (folic acid, doxorubicin) exhibit sufficient biological activity and are effective nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery systems. In vivo results of this study, will broaden the current knowledge on the potential toxicological effects of ZnO@Gd2O3 based nanoparticles and support sustainable expansion of nanotechnology.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In summary, physicochemical and biological analyses indicate that ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles are promising options for multimodal imaging and targeted drug delivery. The results meet modern medicine expectations. The presented solution may result in early disease diagnostics, monitoring of therapy results, while reducing drug doses, thus providing very important health, social and economic effects.
PT
The future lies in optimizing the results obtained and moving towards the development of personalized therapy. Using molecular biology and genetic diagnostics tools, it is possible to establish
RI
the overexpression of surface protein which is characteristic and specific only to a given patient, thus
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
creating some targeted and personalized therapy.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Funding sources
PT
This work was supported by the National Centre for Research and Development under research grants: “Nanomaterials and their application to biomedicine” (PBS1/A9/13/2012), and “Development
RI
of an innovative technology using transgenic porcine tissues for biomedical purposes”
SC
(INNOMED/I/17/NCBR/2014).
D
MA
NU
Vitae
PT E
Anna Woźniak – Ph.D. in Biology, University of Medical Science in Poznan (2006), Manager of Biological Laboratory in NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland.
CE
Research interests: cell cultures; cytotoxicity study of metallic, magnetic, polymer, carbon nanoparticles; toxicity study of metallic, magnetic nanoparticles in vitro (zebrafish): hatching ratio,
AC
viability, developmental malformations assays; nanoparticle-based delivery study: nucleic acids, drugs, fluorescent dyes, targeted drug delivery, multimodal NPs; cancer cell lines/tumours implantation into mice, basic medical procedures, planning and providing procedures and experiments, providing procedures, handling (Certificate of Polish Society of Laboratory Animal Science – PolLASA no 2066/2015). Founder member of Zebrafish Polish Association.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Bartosz F Grześkowiak - Ph.D., Agricultural sciences – Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life
PT
Sciences, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (2014), specialist in
RI
Biological Laboratory in NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland. Research interests: synthesis, characterization and biofunctionalization of nanoparticles; development
SC
of nanosystems for nucleic acid delivery into cells; investigation of nanoparticles:DNA complexes
D
MA
NU
internalization into cells; cytogenetic and physical gene mapping, gene expression analysis.
PT E
Nataliya Babayevska – Ph.D. in Technical Sciences, Specialization: Materials Science, Institute for Single Crystals NAS of Ukraine, (2010); specialist in Chemical Laboratory in NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland. Research interests: nanoparticles and films of rare
CE
earth oxides and semiconductor oxides; synthesis and study of morphology, structure and luminescence properties. Patents/patent applications: Patent of Ukraine "Red Emission Phosphor", N.V. Babayevska,
Dire p.
AC
O.N. Bezkrovna, S.S. Olіynik, Yu.N. Savvіn, A.V. Tolmachov. Patent of Ukraine № 89328 11 2010
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Tomasz Zalewski – Ph.D. in Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland, (2007), Manager of MRI Spectroscopy Laboratory in NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland. Scientific discipline: physics, biophysics, medical physics. Research interests: bioimaging using
SC
RI
PT
MRI, NMR spectroscopy; molecular dynamics in biological systems; contrast agent for MRI and FMT.
Monika Drobna – Master Degree in Biotechnology at Poznań University of Life Sciences (2016), PhD
NU
student in Department of Molecular and Clinical Genetics, Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Science, Poznań, Poland. Research interests: analysis of miRNA expression profile in
MA
childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) and functional studies of influence of
CE
PT E
D
inhibition and mimicry of chosen miRNA on leukaemia cells cultures.
Marta Woźniak-Budych - PhD in chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poznan University of
AC
Technology (2015), specialist in Chemical Laboratory in NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland. Research interests: physical chemistry; membrane techniques; separation of low molecular weight organic compounds produced by fermentation process.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Małgorzata Wiweger – PhD, Head of the Zebrafish Core Facility in International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, Poland. Specialties: cell and molecular biology; tissue culture; microscopy (light, fluorescent and confocal); zebrafish; drug screens; histology; developmental biology; cartialge, bone; proteoglycans; multiple osteochondromas; plant biology. Member of Polish Laboratory Animal
SC
RI
PT
Science Association and founder member of Zebrafish Polish Association.
Ryszard Słomski - Habilitation in medicine, Full professor of medicine. Head of the Department of
NU
Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Professor at Institute of Human
MA
Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Poznan. Research interests: preparation of gene constructs containing human genes, nanodelivery to bacterial and animal cells, including large animals and preparation of other gene constructs for prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems; characterization of novel
D
human, animal and plant genes; paternity and relationship testing based on DNA studies; molecular
AC
CE
PT E
diagnostics of human diseases; bioimaging.
Stefan Jurga - Director of the NanoBioMedical Centre, Poznań, Poland. Research interests: nanotechnology in material science and biomedical research; structure and dynamics in soft matter and solid state studied by MRI, NMR, X-ray scattering; optical, electron and atomic microscopies; NMR relaxation and diffusion; Raman and FTIR spectroscopies; nanotechnology fabrication techniques. Prof. Jurga has held a wide range of responsible functions in the Polish academic system: from 2005 to 2007 he was appointed as Poland’s Vice- Minister of Science and Higher Education of Poland; as Vice Dean
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (1987-1990), Vice Rector (1990-1996) Rector of the Adam Mickiewicz University (1996-2002) in
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Poznań.
References [1] M. H. Chan, H. M. Lin, Preparation and identification of multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo dual-mode imaging, theranostics, and targeted tracking, Biomaterials 46 (2015) 149–158.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[2] K. Haedicke, D. Kozlova, S. Gräfe, U. Teichgräber, M. Epple, I. Hilger, Multifunctional calcium phosphate nanoparticles for combining near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy, Acta Biomaterialia 14 (2015) 197–207.
PT
[3] B. M. Maciejewska, L. E. Coy, K. K. Koziol, S. Jurga, Facile synthesis of highly stable and water-
RI
soluble magnetic MWCNT/alpha-Fe nanocomposites, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 27861-27869.
SC
[4] K. K. Siuzdak, M. Sawczak, M. Klein, G. Nowaczyk, S. Jurga, A. Cenian, Preparation of platinum modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles with the use of laser ablation in water, Phys. Chem. Chem.
NU
Phys. 16 (2014) 15199-1520.
MA
[5] C. F. Wang, M. P. Sarparanta, E. M. Mäkilä, M. L. K. Hyvonen, P. M. Laakkonen, J. J. Salonen, J. T. Hirvonen, A. J. Airaksinen, H. A. Santos, Multifunctional porous silicon nanoparticles for cancer
PT E
D
theranostics, Biomaterials 48 (2015) 108–118.
[6] Y. Enyi, X.J. Loh, Polymeric Hydrogels and Nanoparticles: A Merging and Emerging Field, Aust J
CE
Chem. 66 (2013) 997-1007.
AC
[7] X.J. Loh, T.C. Lee, Q. Dou, G.R. Deen, Utilising inorganic nanocarriers for gene delivery, Biomater. Sci. 4 (2016) 70-86.
[8] C. Dhand, N. Dwivedi, X.J. Loh, A. Ng Jie Ying, N.K. Verma, R. W. Beuerman, R. Lakshminarayanan, S. Ramakrishna, Methods and Strategies for the Synthesis of Diverse Nanoparticles and their Applications: A Comprehensive Overview, Rsc. Advances 5(127) (2015), 105003-105037.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [9] Q.Q. Dou, C.P. Teng, E. Ye, X.J. Loh, Effective near-infrared photodynamic therapy assisted by upconversion nanoparticles conjugated with photosensitizers, Int. J. Nanomedicine 10 (2015) 419-432.
[10] E. Ye, M.D. Regulacio, M.S. Bharathi, H. Pan, M. Lin, M. Bosman, K.Y. Win, H. Ramanarayan, S.Y. Zhang, X.J. Loh, Y.W. Zhang, M.Y. Han, An experimental and theoretical investigation of the
PT
anisotropic branching in gold nanocrosses, Nanoscale 8 (2016) 543-552.
RI
[11] Q. Dou, X. Fang, S. Jiang, P.L. Chee, T.C. Lee, X.J. Loh, Multi-functional Fluorescent Carbon
SC
Dots with Antibacterial and Gene Delivery Properties, RSC Adv. 5(58) (2015) 46817-46822.
NU
[12] H.C. Guo, E. Ye, Z. Li, M.Y. Han, X.J. Loh, Recent progress of atomic layer deposition on
MA
polymeric materials, Materials Science and Engineering: C Part 2 70 (2017) 1182-1191.
[13] R. Lakshminarayanan, X.J. Loh, S. Gayathri, S. Sindhu, Y. Banerjee, R.M. Kini, S. Valiyaveettil,
D
Formation of Transient Amorphous Calcium Carbonate Precursor in Quail Eggshell Mineralization: An
PT E
In Vitro Study, Biomacromolecules 7 (2006) 3202-3209.
[14] R. Lakshminarayanan, E.O. Chi-Jin, X.J. Loh, R.M. Kini, S. Valiyaveettil, Purification and
CE
Characterization of a Vaterite-Inducing Peptide, Pelovaterin, from the Eggshells of Pelodiscus sinensis
AC
(Chinese Soft-Shelled Turtle), Biomacromolecules 6 (2005) 1429-1437.
[15] K. Huang, Q. Dou, X.J. Loh, Nanomaterial mediated optogenetics: opportunities and challenges, RSC Advances 6 (2016) 60896-60906.
[16] B. M. Teo, D.J. Young, X.J. Loh, Magnetic Anisotropic Particles: Toward Remotely Actuated Applications, Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 33 (2016) 709-728.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [17] Z. Li, E. Ye, David, R. Lakshminarayanan, X.J. Loh, Recent Advances of Using Hybrid Nanocarriers in Remotely Controlled Therapeutic Delivery, Small 12 (2016) 4782-4806.
[18] S. S. Kelkar, T. M. Reineke, Theranostics: Combining Imaging and Therapy, Bioconjugate Chem.
PT
22 (2011) 1879–1903.
[19] D. Tamburro, C. Fredolini, V. Espina, T. A. Douglas, A. Ranganathan, L. Ilag, W. Zhou, P. Russo,
RI
B. H. Espina, G. Muto, E. F. III Petricoin, L. A. Liotta, A. Luchini, Multifunctional CoreShell
SC
Nanoparticles: Discovery of Previously Invisible Biomarkers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 19178–
NU
19188.
[20] H. Peng, B. Cui, Y. Wang, Bifunctional Fe3O4@Gd2O3:Eu3+nanocomposites obtained by the
MA
homogeneous precipitation method, Mater. Res. Bull. 48 (2013) 1767–1771.
D
[21] M. Ungureanu, H. Schmidt, Q. Xu, H. Wenckstern, D. Spemann, H. Hochmuth, M. Lorenz, M.
PT E
Grundmann, Electrical and magnetic properties of RE-doped ZnO thin films (RE = Gd, Nd), Superlattices Microstruct 42 (2007) 231–235.
CE
[22] A. A. Ansari, T. N. Hasan, N. A. Syed, J. P. Labis, A. K. Parchur, G. Shafi, A. A. Alshatwi, In-
AC
vitro cyto-toxicity, geno-toxicity, and bio-imaging evaluation of one-pot synthesized luminescent functionalized mesoporous SiO2@Eu(OH)3 core-shell microspheres, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine 9 (2013) 1328–1335.
[23] E. Wolska, J. Kaszewski, P. Kiełbik, J. Grzyb, M. M. Godlewski, M. Godlewski, Rare earth activated ZnO nanoparticles as biomarkers, Opt. Mater. 36 (2014) 1655–1659.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [24] J. L. Bridot, A. C. Faure, S. Laurent, C. Rivière, C. Billotey, B. Hiba, M. Janier, V. Josserand, J.L. Coll, L.V. Elst, R. Muller, S. Roux, P. Perriat, O. Tillement, Hybrid Gadolinium Oxide Nanoparticles: Multimodal Contrast Agents for in Vivo Imaging, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 5076-5084.
[25] P. Sharma, S. C. Brown, G. Walter, Gd nanoparticles: from magnetic resonance imaging to neutron
PT
capture therapy, Adv. Power Technol. 18 (2007) 663-698.
RI
[26] A. Aboulaich, C. M. Tilmaciu, C. Merlin, C. Mercier, H. Guilloteau, G. Medjahdi, R. Schneider,
SC
Physicochemical properties and cellular toxicity of (poly)aminoalkoxysilanes functionalized ZnO
NU
quantum dots Nanotechnology 23 (2012) 335101-335110.
[27] G. A. Farzi, R. Tayebee, S. Naghibinasab, Surface modification of ZnO nano-particles with
MA
Trimetoxyvinyl Silane and Oleic Acid and studying their dispersion in organic media, Int. J. Nano
D
Dimens. 6 (2015) 67-75.
PT E
[28] X. Tang, C. E. S. Guang, L. Li, J. Ding, J. Xue, Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles with Tunable Emission Colors and Their Cell Labeling Applications, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 3383- 3388.
CE
[29] R. O. Moussodia, L. Balan, R. Schneider, Synthesis and characterization of water-soluble ZnO
AC
quantum dots prepared through PEG-siloxane coating, New J. Chem. 32 (2008) 1388–1393.
[30] F. Söderlind, H. Pedersen, R. M. Jr. Petoral, P. O. Käll, K. Uvdal, Synthesis and characterisation of Gd2O3 nanocrystals functionalized by organic acids, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 288 (2005) 140–148.
[31] N. Babayevska, G. Nowaczyk, M. Jarek, K. Załęski, S. Jurga, Synthesis and study of bifunctional core–shell nanostructures based on ZnO@Gd2O3, J Alloy Compd. 672 (2016a) 350–355.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [32] N. Babayevska, B. Peplińska, M. Jarek, L. Yate, K. Tadyszak, J. Gapiński, I. Iatsunskyi, S. Jurga, Synthesis, structure, EPR studies and up-conversion luminescence of ZnO:Er3+-Yb3+@Gd2O3 nanostructures, RSC Adv. 6 (2016b) 89305 – 89312.
[33] W. J. E. Beek, M. M. Wienk, M. Kemerink, X. Yang, R. A. J. Janssen, Hybrid zinc oxide conjugated
PT
polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 9505-9516.
RI
[34] Y. D. Han, X. Meng, F. Wu, Y. Fang, Enhancement of up-conversion emissions in ZnO:Er3+–
SC
Yb3+ after Gd2O3 surface modification, Appl. Surf. Sci. 274 (2013) 60–63.
NU
[35] L. W. Sun, H. Q. Shi, W. N. Li, H. M. Xiao, S. Y. Fu, X. Z. Cao, Z, X, Li, Lanthanum-doped ZnO quantum dots with greatly enhanced fluorescent quantum yield, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 8221-
MA
8227.
D
[36] Q. Luo, J. Zhao, X. Zhang, W. Pan, Nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) coated with chitosan
PT E
oligosaccharides and its potential use in ocular drug delivery system, Int. J. Pharm. 403 (2011) 185– 191.
CE
[37] J. Shen, Q. He, Y. Gao, J. Shi, Y. Li, Mesoporous silica nanoparticles loading doxorubicin reverse
AC
multidrug resistance: performance and mechanism, Nanoscale 3 (2011) 4314-4322.
[38] V. B. Patravale, A. A. Date, R. M. Kulkarni, Nanosuspensions a promising drug delivery strategy, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 56 (2004) 827–84.
[39] S. Honary, F. Zahir, Effect of Zeta Potential on the Properties of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems - A Review (Part 1), Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 12 (2013) 255-264.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [40] M. V. Berridge, P. M. Herst, A. Tan, Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction, Biotechnology Annual Review 11 (2005) 127-152.
[41] Y. Liu, K. Ai, Q. Yuan, L. Lu, Fluorescence-enhanced gadolinium-doped zinc oxide quantum dots
PT
for magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging, Biomaterials 32 (2011) 1185–1192.
[42] Q. Yin, X. Jin, G. Yang, C. Jiang, Z. Songa, G. Sun, Biocompatible folate-modified Gd3+/Yb3+-
SC
RI
doped ZnO nanoparticles for dualmodal MRI/CT imaging, RSC Adv. 4 (2014) 53561-53569.
[43] R. Mrówczyński, J. Jurga-Stopa, R. Markiewicz, E. L. Coy, S. Jurga, A. Woźniak, Assessment of
NU
polydopamine coated magnetic nanoparticles in doxorubicin delivery, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 5936-5943.
MA
[44] Y. Pan, S. Neuss, A. Leifert, F. Wen, U. Simon, G. Schmid, W. Brandau, W. Jahnen-Dechent, Size
D
dependent cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles, Small 3 (2007) 1941–1949.
PT E
[45] Y. L. Wu, S. Fu, A. I. Tok, X. T. Zeng, C. S. Lim, L. C. Kwek, F. C. Boey, A dual-colored biomarker made of doped ZnO nanocrystals, Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 345605-345614.
CE
[46] W. Q. Zhang, Y. Lu, T. K. Zhang, W. Xu, M. Zhang, S. H. Yu, Controlled Synthesis and
AC
Biocompatibility of Water-Soluble ZnO Nanorods/Au Nanocomposites with Tunable UV and Visible Emission Intensity, J Phys Chem C 112 (2008) 19872–1987.
[47] S. P. Singh, Multifunctional magnetic quantum dots for cancer theranostics, J Biomed Nanotechnol. 7 (2011) 95–97.
[48] H. Hong, J. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. W. Engle, R. J. Nickles, X. Wang, W. Ca, Cancer-targeted optical imaging with fluorescent zinc oxide nanowires, Nano Lett. 11 (2011) 3744–3750.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[49] Q. Yuan, S. Hein, R. D. Misra, New generation of chitosan-encapsulated ZnO quantum dots loaded with drug: synthesis, characterization and in vitro drug delivery response, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 2732–2739.
PT
[50] D. X. Ye, Y. Y. Ma, W. Zhao, H. M. Cao, J. L. Kong, H. M. Xiong, H. Möhwald, ZnO-Based Nanoplatforms for Labeling and Treatment of Mouse Tumors without Detectable Toxic Side Effects,
SC
RI
ACS Nano 10 (2016) 4294–4300.
[51] K. Wang, J. Ma, M. He, G. Gao, H. Xu, J. Sang, Y. Wang, B. Zhao, D. Cui, Toxicity Assessments
NU
of Near-infrared Upconversion Luminescent LaF3:Yb,Er in Early Development of Zebrafish Embryos,
MA
Theranostics 3 (2013) 258-266.
[52] H. Boran, G. Ulutas, Genotoxic effects and gene expression changes in larval zebrafish after
PT E
D
exposure to ZnCl2 and ZnO nanoparticles, Dis Aquat Organ. 117 (2016) 205-214.
[53] H. M. Maes, F. Stibany, S. Giefers, B. Daniels, B. Deutschmann, W. Baumgartner, A. Schäffer, Accumulation and distribution of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in zebrafish (Danio rerio), Environ Sci
AC
CE
Technol. 48 (2014) 12256-12264.
[54] C. C. Piccinetti, C. Montis, M. Bonini, R. Laurà, M.C. Guerrera, G. Radaelli, F. Vianello, V. Santinelli, F. Maradonna, V. Nozzi, A. Miccoli, I. Olivotto, Transfer of silica-coated magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles through food: a molecular and morphological study in zebrafish, Zebrafish 11 (2014) 567579.
[55] J. B. Pryor, B. J. Harper, S. L. Harper, Comparative toxicological assessment of PAMAM and thiophosphoryl dendrimers using embryonic zebrafish, Int J Nanomedicine 17 (2014) 1947-1956.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[56] L. C. Wehmas, C. Anders, J. Chess, A. Punnoose, C. B. Pereira, J. A. Greenwood, R. L. Tanguay, Comparative Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Toxicity Using Embryonic Zebrafish, Toxicol Rep. 2 (2015) 702-715.
PT
[57] P. N. Wiecinski, K. M. Metz, T. C. King Heiden, K. M. Louis, A. N. Mangham, R. J. Hamers, W. Heideman, R. E. Peterson, J. A. Pedersen, Toxicity of oxidatively degraded quantum dots to developing
SC
RI
zebrafish (Danio rerio), Environ Sci Technol. 47 (2013) 9132-9139.
[58] W. Bai, Z. Zhang, W. Tian, X. He, Y. Ma, Y. Zhao, Z. Chai, Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles
NU
to zebrafish embryo: a physicochemical study of toxicity mechanism, J. Nanopart. Res. 12 (2010) 1645-
MA
1654.
[59] O. Bar-Ilan, K. M. Louis, S. P. Yang, J. A. Pedersen, R. J. Hamers, R. E. Peterson, W. Heideman,
D
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles produce phototoxicity in the developing zebrafish, Nanotoxicology 6
PT E
(2012) 670–679.
[60] P. D. Nallathamby, K. J. Lee, X. H. N. Xu, Design of stable and uniform single nanoparticle
CE
photonics for in vivo dynamics imaging of nanoenvironments of zebrafish embryonic fluids, ACS Nano
AC
2 (2008) 1371–1380.
[61] X. Zhu, S. Tian, Z. Cai, Toxicity Assessment of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Early Life Stages, PLOS ONE 7 (2012) e46286.
[62] P. V. Asharani, Y. lianwu, Z. Gong, S. Valiyaveettil, Comparison of the toxicity of silver, gold and platinum nanoparticles in developing zebrafish embryos, Nanotoxicology 5 (2011) 43–54.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [63] B. Jovanović, T. Ji, D. Palić, Gene expression of zebrafish embryos exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles and hydroxylated fullerenes, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 74 (2011) 1518–1525.
[64] L. Y. Rizzo, S. K. Golombek, M. E. Mertens, Y. Pan, D. Laaf, J. Broda, J. Jayapaul, D. Möckel, V. Subr, W.E. Hennink, G. Storm, U. Simon, W. Jahnen-Dechent, W. Kiessling, S.M. Samaee, S. Rabbani,
PT
B. Jovanović, M.R. Mohajeri-Tehrani, V. Haghpanah, Efficacy of the hatching event in assessing the embryo toxicity of the nano-sized TiO₂ particles in zebrafish: a comparison between two different
SC
RI
classes of hatching-derived variables, Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 8 (2015) 116-121.
[65] Z. Zhou, J. Son, B. Harper, Z. Zhou, S. Harper, Influence of surface chemical properties on the
NU
toxicity of engineered zinc oxide nanoparticles to embryonic zebrafish, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 6
MA
(2015) 1568–1579.
[66] Y. Han, J. P. Zhang, J. Q. Qian, C. Q. Hu, Cardiotoxicity evaluation of anthracyclines in zebrafish
PT E
D
(Danio rerio), J Appl Toxicol. 35 (2015) 241-252.
[67] C. C. Huang, A. Monte, J. M. Cook, M. S. Kabir, K. Peterson, Zebrafish Heart Failure Models for
CE
the Evaluation of Chemical Probes and Drugs, Assay Drug Dev Technol. 11 (2013) 561-572.
AC
[68] J. Duan, Y. Yu, H. Shi, L. Tian, C. Guo, P. Huang, X. Zhou, S. Peng, Z. Sun, Toxic Effects of Silica Nanoparticles on Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae, PLOS ONE 8 (2013) e74606.
[69] X. Zhu, J. Zhou, Z. Cai, TiO2 nanoparticles in the marine environment: impact on the toxicity of tributyltin to abalone (Haliotis diversicolor supertexta) embryos, Environ Sci Technol. 45 (2011) 3753– 3758.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [70] J. Cheng, E. Flahaut, S. H. Cheng, Effect of carbon nanotubes on developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos, Environ Toxicol Chem. 26 (2007) 708–716.
[71] N. R. Brun, M. Lenz, B. Wehrli, K. Fent, Comparative effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles and dissolved zinc on zebrafish embryos and eleuthero-embryos: Importance of zinc ions, Science of the
PT
Total Environment 476 (2014) 657–666.
RI
[72] X. Zhu, J. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Chang, Y. Chen, The impact of ZnO nanoparticle aggregates on the
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
embryonic development of zebrafish (Danio rerio), Nanotechnology 20 (2009) 195103-195109.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights 1. A novel ZnO@Gd2O3 core/shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications is proposed. 2. The mechanism relies on multimodal imaging and targeted drug delivery system.
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
3. The toxicity in vitro/in vivo is determined as biocompatible and effective.