Zonisamide for refractory juvenile absence epilepsy

Zonisamide for refractory juvenile absence epilepsy

Accepted Manuscript Title: Zonisamide for Refractory Juvenile Absence Epilepsy Author: Reana Velizarova Arielle Crespel Pierre Genton Anna Serafini Ph...

89KB Sizes 0 Downloads 62 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Zonisamide for Refractory Juvenile Absence Epilepsy Author: Reana Velizarova Arielle Crespel Pierre Genton Anna Serafini Philippe Gelisse PII: DOI: Reference:

S0920-1211(14)00126-0 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.04.010 EPIRES 5145

To appear in:

Epilepsy Research

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

19-1-2014 31-3-2014 27-4-2014

Please cite this article as: VELIZAROVA, R., CRESPEL, A., GENTON, P., SERAFINI, A., GELISSE, P.,Zonisamide for Refractory Juvenile Absence Epilepsy, Epilepsy Research (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.04.010 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ip t

Zonisamide for Refractory Juvenile Absence Epilepsy

Epilepsy Unit, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France. Centre Saint Paul-H. Gastaut, Marseille, France.

M

2

an

1

us

cr

1 1 2 1 Reana VELIZAROVA, Arielle CRESPEL, Pierre GENTON, Anna SERAFINI, 1 Philippe GELISSE

te

d

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dr Philippe Gelisse, Epilepsy Unit, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, 80 avenue Fliche, 34295 Montpellier cedex 05, France. Fax: +33 4 67 33 61 00; E-mail address [email protected]

Ac ce p

Character and word counts: Title: 51 characters including spaces and punctuation Abstract: 246 words. Paper: 1332 words (excluding references).

Figure: 0 Table: 1 References: 11

1

Page 1 of 15

Abstract

Purpose To examine the clinical effect of zonisamide (ZNS) in patients with drug-

ip t

resistant Juvenile Absence Epilepsy (JAE). Methods Between 2006 and 2010, 13 JAE patients were successively treated with add-on

cr

ZNS. Safety and efficacy were assessed according to the patient and caregiver reports at

us

visits every 3 months. Response rate was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency.

an

Results Mean age was 42 years. No patient had been seizure free for a period >12 months before ZNS. The mean follow-up was 34 months. The mean dosage of ZNS was

M

388 mg. ZNS was effective for absence seizures (AS) in all patients (more than 50% AS reduction). Four patients reached seizure reduction on 550-600 mg/day. Three (23%) had

d

a reduction in AS frequency > 75% and five (38,5%) between 50%-75%. Seizure

te

freedom was achieved in five patients (38,5%) (3 patients with AS only and two with AS

Ac ce p

plus generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS)). Before ZNS, four patients had AS evolving to absence status. After ZNS, three of them were in the seizure-free group, the later never experienced this type of complication. Among 7 patients with AS plus GTCS, two of them did not report any improvement in the frequency of GTCS (29%). Conclusion This observational post-marketing study confirms the broad-spectrum activity of ZNS that includes GTCS, myoclonic seizures and now AS. This study provides evidence that add-on ZNS is efficient and well tolerated in adult patients with refractory JAE, even at high doses.

2

Page 2 of 15

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

Keywords: Juvenile Absence Epilepsy; Zonisamide; Drug resistance; Absence seizures; Antiepileptic drugs

3

Page 3 of 15

Introduction Juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) is an idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) with onset around puberty. Seizures are typical absences in 100%, generalized tonic-clonic

ip t

seizures (GTCS) in 80% and sporadic myoclonic jerks in 20%. JAE is estimated at

cr

around 10% of IGE and between 1.5-2% of all epilepsies (Gelisse et al., 2012). Valproate (VPA) is very effective in JAE; in case of side effects, or in women of childbearing age,

us

lamotrigine (LTG) can be used (Gelisse et al., 2012). Ethosuximide (ESM), a T-type calcium channel blocker is the drug of choice in chilhood absence epilepsy (Glauser et

an

al., 2013), but is not recommended in monotherapy in JAE due to existence of GTCS. JAE is not considered a severe condition but in some patients, absence seizures (AS) and

M

GTCS may resist first-line drugs. Experimental studies indicate that zonisamide (ZNS)

d

could be a blocker of T-type voltage-gated calcium channel (Mac Donald, 2002; Matar et

Ac ce p

JAE patients.

te

al., 2009). In this study, we examined the clinical effect of add-on ZNS in drug-resistant

Patients and Methods

All patients referred to the epilepsy Unit of Montpellier (tertiary center

specialized in epilepsy for adolescent and adults) were included prospectively since 2001 in a computerized database. Database includes the gender, the medical history, the type of epilepsy, the onset of seizures, the types and the frequency of seizures at each visit and the antiepileptic drugs. In our center, benign and easily treatable forms of epilepsy tend to

4

Page 4 of 15

be underrepresented.

ip t

Between 2006 and 2010, of the 38 JAE patients, 13 (34%) (7 males, 6 females) were treated successively with ZNS in add-on therapy because they were difficult to

cr

control with other drugs. The diagnosis of JAE was based on the criteria of the

us

International Classification of Epilepsies (Comission, 1989). All patients had been treated at least once with VPA, LTG or ESM but these drugs were stopped in some patients

an

because of side effects or lack of efficacy. ZNS was started at 50 mg/day with increase of 50 mg every one or two weeks. The titration schedule was individualized for each patient

M

based on the tolerability. Safety and efficacy were assessed according to the patient and caregiver reports at visits every 3 months. Responders were defined as experiencing a

te

d

50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. The total daily dose was adjusted for each patient according to the efficacy and tolerability. The maximal daily dose was 600

Ac ce p

mg/day.

Results

The demographic data and clinical characteristics of the patients are presented on

Table 1. Mean age of the patients at the time of inclusion in the study was 42 years (range 22-64 years). The mean age at onset of seizures was 15.6 years (range 5-35 years). The mean duration of epilepsy was 29.7 years (range 16-59). Before ZNS, the baseline frequency of GTCS was 1-2 annually in four (pat. 2-4, 8), monthly in two (pat. 6, 11),

5

Page 5 of 15

and weekly in one (pat. 12). The AS frequency was monthly in 4 (pat. 2, 5, 13), weekly in 5 (pat. 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11) and daily in four (pat. 7, 9, 10, 12). Three patients had 3-4 episodes of absence status per year (pat 4, 5, 12), and one every month (pat. 9). No

ip t

patient had been seizure-free before ZNS therapy for a period >12 months. One patient

cr

(Pat 10) had vagus nerve stimulation.

us

The mean follow-up period was 34 months (range 22-51 months). ZNS was stopped in patient 7 after 24 months because of tremor in spite of reduction of AS

an

frequency (> 50%). The other patients tolerated ZNS and the drug was continued. The

M

mean dosage of ZNS was 388 mg/day (range 150-600 mg/day).

d

ZNS was effective for AS in all patients (more than 50% absence reduction).

te

Three (23%) had a reduction in AS frequency > 75% (pat. 2, 3, 13) and five (38.5%) between 50%-75% (pat. 6-8, 10, 12). Seizure freedom was achieved in five patients

Ac ce p

(38.5%) (3 patients with AS only (pat. 1, 5, 9) and two with AS plus GTCS (pat. 4, 11) with a mean follow-up of 30 months (range: 22 to 45 months). All patients with absence status before ZNS never experienced this type of complication after the introduction of the drug. After ZNS, three of them were in the seizure free group. The later had more than 50% seizure reduction and never experienced this type of complication. Among the 7 patients with AS plus GTCS, two of them did not report a decrease in the seizure frequency of GTCS (29%) (pat. 2, 6).

6

Page 6 of 15

Patient 11 was treated in monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ) when he was referred because a wrong diagnosis of focal epilepsy was made. However, he was previously treated with valproate, ethosuximide, lamotrigine and phenobarbital but these

ip t

drugs were not well tolerated and the patient continued to have frequent seizures. CBZ was proposed by his neurologist and was quite effective against GTCS during several

cr

months but reappeared progressively. AS were present every weeks. When ZNS was

an

us

introduced, he became seizure free and CBZ was progressively stopped.

M

Discussion

d

JAE is not considered severe. The response to therapy is usually good,

te

approximately 80% of cases become seizure-free with the traditional drugs such as

Ac ce p

ethosuximide and valproate (Gelisse et al., 2012). But in the study of Bartolomei et al. (1997), which included 27 cases of JAE, the results were not quite as good since GTCS or AS persisted in about 40% of the patients. This study was performed in a center specialized in epilepsy for children and adults with moderate or severe epilepsies. Our center is also specialized in difficult-to treat patients that explain why about one third of our JAE patients were not controlled with classical drugs. This is the reason why we choose to treat these patients with ZNS in add-on therapy.

7

Page 7 of 15

ZNS is effective against focal seizures and GTCS in patients with localizationrelated epilepsy (Zaccara et al., 2009). Some reports suggest that ZNS may be effective in myoclonic epilepsies such as juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and progressive myoclonic

ip t

epilepsies (Zaccara et al., 2009). Different studies have shown a positive effect in the

treatment of AS but these studies included heterogeneous group of patients with different

cr

types of generalized epilepsies and with a clear predominance of children (Zaccara et al.,

us

2009). The efficacy of ZNS on AS has been shown for the first time in a small series of patients in a prospective study (Yagi and Sieno, 1992). Later, Yamauchi and Aikawa

an

(2004) in their post-marketing surveillance study reported that the responder rate (proportion of patients with at least 50% seizure reduction) was 87.5% (n=8) for typical

M

absences and 46.3% (n=54) for atypical absences. Wilfong and Schultz (2005) examined

d

efficacy of ZNS in a group of young patients (n=45) with AS and found remarkable

Ac ce p

absence reduction.

te

results. Seizure freedom achieved 51.1% of the patients and 35.5 % had more than 50%

Our population includes drug-resistant JAE patients with a long evolution. All had

been treated with adequate drugs for JAE at one time of their life with incomplete control. ZNS was given as an adjunctive therapy. All patients were responders, including more than 1/3 seizure free and 23% with at least 75% absence seizure reduction from baseline. The mean dosage of ZNS was 388 mg/day which is in agreement with the therapeutic dosage reported in other studies (Wilfong and Schultz, 2005; Ohtahara, 2006). Four of our patients reached seizure reduction on 550-600 mg/d ZNS, which is higher than the recommended dose of 500 mg/d. They did not report side effects.

8

Page 8 of 15

In conclusion, ZNS may be used with benefit as add-on therapy in adult patients with refractory JAE. Patients treated with ZNS have a decrease in seizure frequency. Five

ip t

patients became seizure-free and the patients with a history of absence status never experienced this type of seizure again. The tolerance was good even in patients treated

cr

with high doses. This observational post-marketing study confirms a broad spectrum

us

activity of ZNS, also now against typical absences. Add-on ZNS can be used in JAE,

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

even at high doses.

9

Page 9 of 15

References

Bartolomei F, Roger J, Bureau M, Genton P, Dravet C, Viallat D, Gastaut JL. Prognostic

cr

ip t

factors for childhood and juvenile absence epilepsies. Eur Neurol 1997;37:169-75.

Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against

us

Epilepsy: proposal for the classification of epilepsy and epileptic syndromes. Epilepsia

an

1989;30:389-99.

M

Gelisse P, Wolf P, Inoue Y. Juvenile absence epilepsy. In: Bureau M, Genton P, Dravet C, Delgado-Escueta A, Tassinari P, Thomas P, Wolf P (Eds). Epileptic Syndromes in

d

Infancy, Childhood and Adolescence. 5th Ed. Montrouge: John Libbey Eurotext Ltd,

te

2012:329-339.

Ac ce p

Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, Clark PO, Adamson PC; Childhood Absence Epilepsy Study Team. Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy: initial monotherapy outcomes at 12 months. Epilepsia 2013;54:141-55.

Mac Donald RL. Zonisamide: Mechanisms of action. In: Levy RH, Mattson RH, Meldrum BS, Perucca E. Antiepileptic drugs. 5th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002:838-851.

10

Page 10 of 15

Matar N, Jin W, Wrubel H, Hescheler J, Schneider T, Weiergraber M. Zonisamide block of cloned human T-type voltage-gated calcium channels. Epilepsy Res 2009;83:224-34.

ip t

Ohtahara S. Zonisamide in the management of epilepsy-Japanese experience. Epilepsy

cr

Res 2006;68 (Suppl 2):25-33.

us

Wilfong A, Schultz R. Zonisamide for absence seizures. Epilepsy Res. 2005;64:31-34.

an

Yagi K, Seino M. Methodological requirements for clinical trials in refractory epilepsiesour experience with zonisamide. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry

d

M

1992;16:79-85.

Ac ce p

1):41-48.

te

Yamauchi T, Aikawa H. Efficacy of zonisamide: our experience. Seizure 2004;13 (Suppl

Zaccara G, Specchio LM. Long-term safety and effectiveness of zonisamide in the treatment of epilepsy: a review of the literature. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2009;5:249-59.

11

Page 11 of 15

Disclosure Dr Velizarova reports no conflicts of interest.

ip t

Dr Crespel received support for teaching programs from Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, GSK and served as advisory board member for Eisai-France for zonisamide and presently serves as advisory board member for Eisai-France for perampenel.

cr

Dr Genton received speaker honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, GSK, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, UCB, Eisai and received support for teaching programs from SanofiAventis and UCB.

us

Dr Serafini reports no conflicts of interest.

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

Dr Gelisse received support for teaching programs from Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Psicofarma. He received a research grant form the French League Against Epilepsy and the Janssen-Cilag company. He worked as consultant for Eisai-France in 2011.

12

Page 12 of 15

Individual contribution

Dr. Velizarova - Acquisition of data - Analysis and interpretation - Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content

ip t

Dr. Crespel- Study concept and design- Acquisition of data- Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content

us

Dr Serafini- Acquisition of data - Analysis and interpretation

cr

Dr. Genton- Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

Dr Gelisse- Study concept and design - Acquisition of data- Analysis and interpretation Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content - Study supervision

13

Page 13 of 15

i cr us

Sex M

Age 22

Onset of epilepsy (years) 6

2

F

28

8

VPA, LTG

3 4

M F

26 32

10 14

VPA, LTG VPA, LTG

5

F

64

5

6

M

26

7

F

8

Concomitant AED at referral VPA, LTG

FU (months) 36

ZNS (mg/d) 200

48

Seizure free

400

GTCS 1-2 annually, AS monthly

No change GTCS, AS reduction >75%

48 25

400 300

GTCS 1-2 annually, AS weekly GTCS 1-2 annually, AS weekly, ASE 3/year

GTCS free, AS reduction >75% Seizure free

LTG, LEV

45

150

AS monthly, ASE 4/year

Seizure free

10

VPA, LEV

24

400

GTCS monthly, AS weekly

No change GTCS, AS reduction >50%

52

35

PB, LTG, CNZ

24

400

AS daily

AS reduction >50%

F

43

9

LTG, LEV

37

600

GTCS 1-2 annually, AS weekly

No change GTCS, AS reduction >50%

9

M

56

14

24

300

AS daily, ASE monthly

Seizure free

10

M

46

14

VPA, LEV, CNZ VPA, PB, LTG and VNS

24

600

AS daily

ABS reduction > 50%

11

M

51

11

CBZ

22

600

GTCS monthly, AS weekly

Seizure free leading to stop CBZ

12

F

48

14

LTG

51

550

GTCS weekly, AS daily, ASE every 2-3 months

GTCS and AS reduction > 50%, ASE free

13

F

52

9

VPA, LTG

36

150

AS monthly

AS reduction >75%

Ac

pt

ed

M

Baseline seizure type and frequency AS weekly

ce

Pat. 1

an

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristic of the patients before and after zonisamide

Effect of ZNS

AS: absence seizures; ASE: absence status epilepticus; AED: antiepileptic drugs; FU: Follow-up; GTCS: Generalized tonic-clonic seizure; MJ: myoclonic jerks; CBZ: carbamazepine; CNZ: clonazepam; LTG; lamotrigine ; LEV: levetiracetam; PB: Phenobarbital; VNS: vagus nerve stimulation; VPA: valproate; ZNS: zonisamide

Page 14 of 15

14

i cr us

Ac

ce

pt

ed

M

an

Highlights Observational post-marketing study. Broad-spectrum activity of zonisamide that includes now typical absences. Zonisamide is efficient in adult patients with refractory juvenile absence epilepsy.

Page 15 of 15

15