Effect of liming on mycorrhiza formation in pinus sylvestris and picea abies

Effect of liming on mycorrhiza formation in pinus sylvestris and picea abies

459 Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 28 (1989) 459-462 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam Printed in Czechoslovakia EFFECT OF LIMIN...

118KB Sizes 1 Downloads 49 Views

459

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 28 (1989) 459-462 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam Printed in Czechoslovakia

EFFECT OF LIMING ON MYCORRHIZA FORMATION IN PINUS SYLVESTRIS AND PICEA ABIES Semjonova L. Forest

Research

Institute,

Karelian

Branch

of

the USSR

Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, USSR Introduction The

acidity

of

the

environment

of mycorrhizal fungi

varies over wide ranges (Eremeeva, 1980, Schemachanova, 1962, Mikola, ful both

1956). Mycorrhiza formation can be succes-

on acidic podzolic soils and carbonate chernozem

(Lobanov~ 1953, Clement et ai.,1977, Mikola, 1966). Investigators often find no direct connections acidity and

between soil

the intensity of myccorhiza formation. Richards

(1965) shows that mycorrhizae are formed within a wide range of pH

values and

in cases when inhibition takes place, the

effect can be explained by a high concentration of nitrates, but not

by soil

to Mirchnik total number (1966), in are

formed

in alkalinity. On the other hand according

(1957)

soil . liming

of fungi. acidic soils on

pine

considerably

reduces the

According to observations of Mikola myccorhizae with

seedling

roots.

a thicker mantle

Liming also reduces

dichotomous branching of short roots. Materials and Methods The effect of different levels of

liming on

growth of

Pinus sylvestris (L.) and Picea abies (L.) Karsten seedlings was studied in a field experiment. Mycorrhizal infection was examined in

one year old seedlings to determine optimal and

toxic levels of liming. Experimental plots were placed

in a

460

uprooted clearing

with medium

(CaCO~ - 73.5% and

MgCO~

-

sandy soil. Milled limestone 12.9%)

was

spread

on fallow

plots one year prior to sowing (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, 7.0, 8.0, i0.0, 14.0, 20.0, 25.0, t/ha).

All the plots were fertilized (N30 P40 K30) before sowing. The experimental

plots were

1.5 x

1.5 m

size. The sowing

was performed in the middle part of each plot (i.0 x 1.0 m). Each dose was applied on two plots. The plots with spruce

were

adjacent

to

each

other

in

pine and

each

tratment.

Mycorrhiza formation was examined in 30 - 50

seedlings from

each

formation

plot.

The

intensity

of

mycorrhiza

was

estimated on a graded scale: 1 - mycorrhizal infection of up to 25%

of all short roots of seedling, 2 - up to 50%,

3 - over 50% (Schubin, 1973). Results and discussion The results of

our

reserach

revealed

no correlation

between the lime rate applied and the intensity of mycorrhiza formation both of pine highest

mycorrhiza

and

spruce

infection

was

from the plot with lime rate 0.5 t/ha one

with

4

t/ha

sandy

soil. The

in pine roots

(pH 4.5),

the lowest

rate (pH 6.3). Ectomycorrhizae, however,

developed successfully with (Fig. I).

in

observed

even

Bifurcated mycorrhizae

higher

application rates

were absent on plots with

i0 and 14 t/ha (pH 7.4 - 7.5) but on plots receving higher rates

(20 and

25 t/ha,

seedlings had dichotomous of high

lime doses

pH 7.5

branching.

and an

- 7.8) Thus

lime at

92% of pine

the application

increase of pH of soil from 4.3

(control) to 7.8 (25 t/ha) does not rule out the possibility of

mycorrhiza

formation

degree of

mycorrhiza

roots are

probably rather

of

seedlings. Differences in the

infection

and

branching

of short

due to the initial background of

fungal flora of the plots than to the lime rate applied.

461

SY

8~ FII

I

I

~'~ ~

-

J

4

[tl~)

R 2"

D1

I,

4 Fig. i.

pH b

7

8~

Mycorrhiza infection and dry weight of above-ground parts of one year

old pine (I) and spruce (II) seedlings in limed sandy soll.

References Eremeeva,

L. V.: Vliyanie pH sredy na rost m i k o r i z n y k h

saprofitnykh gribov. lesoobrazuyushchikh p. 45-64, 1980.

In: M i k o r i z n ye

griby i m i k o r i z y

porod Severa. Pettrozavodsk,

i

462

Clement, A., Garbaye, J., Le Tacon, F.: Importance des ectomycorrhizes dans la resistance au calcaire du Pin noir (Pinus nigra Arn. spp. nigricans Host). Oecol. Plant. 12: 111-131,-1977. Lobanov, N.

V.: Mikotrofnost drevesnykh rastenii. Moskva,

1953. Mikola, P.: Studies on the ectendotrophic mycorrhiza in pine forests

with spruce

undergrowth. Ann.

Bot. Fenn.

3: 406-409, 1966. Mirchnik, T. G.: 0 gribakh, vyzyvayushchikh toksichonst dernovopodzolistoi pochvy turennosti. Mikrobiol.

razlichnoi stepeni okul'-

26: 78, 1957.

Richards, B. N.: Mycorrhiza development of loblolly pine seedlings in

relation to soil reaction and the supply

of nitrate. Plant Soil, 22: 187-199, 1965. Shemakhanova, N. M.: Mikotrofiya drevesnykh porod.

Moskva,

1962. Shubin, V.

I.: Mikotrofnost drevesnykh porod i e e

znachenie

pri razvedenii lesa v taezhnoi zone. Leningrad,

1982.

Semjonova, L., 1989: Effect of liming on mycorrhiza formation in Pinus svlvestris and picea ables. Agric., Ecosystems Environ., 28: 459-462.