Follicular lymphoma (FL): Immunological tolerance theory in FL

Follicular lymphoma (FL): Immunological tolerance theory in FL

Accepted Manuscript Follicular lymphoma (FL): immunological tolerance theory in FL. Ricardo García-Muñoz, Carlos Panizo PII: DOI: Reference: S0198-88...

2MB Sizes 5 Downloads 68 Views

Accepted Manuscript Follicular lymphoma (FL): immunological tolerance theory in FL. Ricardo García-Muñoz, Carlos Panizo PII: DOI: Reference:

S0198-8859(16)30452-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.09.010 HIM 9836

To appear in:

Human Immunology

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

16 September 2014 27 September 2016 28 September 2016

Please cite this article as: García-Muñoz, R., Panizo, C., Follicular lymphoma (FL): immunological tolerance theory in FL., Human Immunology (2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.09.010

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

2

3

Follicular lymphoma (FL): immunological tolerance theory in FL.

4 Ricardo García-Muñoz1 and Carlos Panizo2.

5 6 7

1. Hematology Department, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.

8

2. Hematology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

9 10 11

Corresponding author: +Ricardo García-Muñoz MD E-mail: [email protected].

12

+Hematology Service.

13

Hospital San Pedro.

14

c/Piqueras 98

15

Logroño, La Rioja 26006

16

Spain

17

Phone no: + 34 941 29 89 12

18 19 20 21 22 23

1

24

Abstract.

25

The ultimate cause of follicular lymphoma (FL) remains unknown. Remarkably, almost

26

nothing is known about immunological tolerance mechanisms that might contribute to

27

FL development. Immunological tolerance mechanisms, like other stimuli, also induce

28

persistent changes of B cell receptors that induce genetic instability and molecular

29

aberrations promoting the development of a neoplasm.

30 31

Using the same method as Burnet, we provide a new perspective taking advantage of

32

the comparison of a normal linear B cell differentiation process and FL development

33

within the framework of clonal selection theory. We propose that FL is a malignancy of

34

cells that acquire both translocation t(14;18) and self-BCR, inducing them to proliferate

35

and mature, resistant to negative selection. Additional genetic damage induced by non-

36

apoptotic tolerance mechanisms, such as receptor editing, may transform a self-reactive

37

B cell with t(14;18) into an FL. The result of tolerogenic mechanisms and genetic

38

aberrations is the survival of FL B cell clones with similar markers and homogenous

39

gene expression signatures despite the different stages of maturation at which the

40

molecular damage occurs. To antagonize further growth advantage due to self-antigen

41

recognition and chronic activation of tolerance mechanisms in the apoptosis-resistant

42

background of FL B cells, inhibitors of BCR signaling may be promising therapeutic

43

options.

44

45 46 47 48

2

49

Follicular lymphoma (FL): immunologic tolerance theory in FL.

50 Ricardo García Muñoz1 and Carlos Panizo2.

51 52 53

1. Hematology Department, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.

54

2. Hematology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona Spain.

55 56

Keywords: autoimmunity, clonal selection theory, tolerance mechanisms, follicular

57

lymphoma, receptor editing, somatic hypermutation

58 59

Introduction.

60

Burnet´s clonal selection theory, immunological tolerance and the idea of self and non-

61

self discrimination set the scene for modern cellular immunology. In 1960, Frank M.

62

Burnet, during his Nobel lecture, presented the theoretical implications of

63

immunological tolerance and the self-recognition hypothesis, and hoped that his

64

thoughts would guide scientists towards novel discoveries in immunology. The theory

65

formulated by Burnet provides a framework for interpreting the novel findings in

66

follicular lymphoma (FL) biology and introduces the idea of immunological tolerance

67

as a novel mechanism to promote lymphoid malignancies.

68 69

A landmark contribution is the “clonal” point of view. It recognizes that expendable

70

lymphocytes can be regarded as belonging to clones stemming from somatic mutation,

71

or conceivably, other inheritable changes. Each such clone will have some individual

72

characteristic and in a special sense will be subject to an evolutionary process of

73

selective survival within the internal environment of the body.

3

74 75

In 1960, Burnet and Medawar were co-recipients of the Nobel Prize for the discovery of

76

acquired immunological tolerance.

77 78

Burnet´s reflections about tolerance state that:

79 80 81

a) A stem cell, on differentiation, becomes a lymphocyte carrying a specific pattern of B cell receptor (BCR).

82

b) If an immune pattern (B cell receptor) is generated by a random process, a

83

mechanism must exist by which any “self-reactive” cells that may emerge can

84

be eliminated or functionally inhibited.

85 86

c) More than one mechanism may be needed to establish and maintain this intrinsic immunological tolerance toward self-components.

87 88 89

The ultimate cause of follicular lymphoma (FL) remains unknown. FL is a tumor of

90

germinal center B cells in which centrocytes fail to undergo apoptosis because they

91

have a chromosomal rearrangement t(14;18), that prevents the normal BCL2 gene from

92

switching off (1,2). It has been postulated that a second genetic “hit”, or even simple

93

exposure to antigen in a cell with a BCL2 translocation, could result in the development

94

of lymphoma because once it begins proliferating in response to antigen, it does not

95

respond to the usual stimuli for apoptosis (2). Remarkably, self-antigen recognition by

96

FL B cell receptors (BCRs) has been described in 26% of cases (3). The molecular

97

anatomy of the t(14;18) genetic alteration suggests that it occurs prior to antigen

98

exposure in an immature B cell that expresses nuclear TdT (nuclear enzyme terminal

4

99

deoxynucleotidyltransferase) in the bone marrow (BM) and results from an error in

100

primary V[variable], D[diversity] and J [joining] gene recombination induced by the

101

RAG (recombinase activating genes) complex (4). FL cells typically express surface

102

IgM and IgD, and have somatic hypermutations in the variable region of their

103

immunoglobulin genes (1,2,4). Interestingly, if 26% of FL BCR recognize self-antigens

104

(3) but retain the capacity to differentiate from B cell precursors to mutated FL cells,

105

this implies that some tolerance mechanisms fail and FL evades immunological

106

tolerance.

107 108

Immunological tolerance mechanisms, in a way similar to other stimuli, also induce the

109

persistence of B cell receptor changes that induce genetic instability and molecular

110

aberrations that promote the development of a neoplasm (5-8).

111 112 113

In the present article, we first review tolerance mechanisms for avoiding self-reactivity

114

in FL cells. We then propose a hypothesis in which tolerance mechanisms play a key

115

role in FL development.

116 117

The objective of this review is to present a hypothesis about the generation of FL in the

118

light of the clonal selection approach.

119 120 121 122 123

5

124 125 126 127 128

Hypothesis: During B cell development translocation t(14;18) protect self-reactive B

129

cells increasing resistance to elimination. Self-BCR-auto-antigen interaction induce

130

chronic activation of tolerance mechanisms specially receptor editing. Unfortunately

131

some times this mechanism increases genomic instability and promotes additional

132

genetic damage that induces FL progression or transformation to aggressive B cell

133

neoplasm.

134 135

The Burnet´s Rules of Tolerance and Autoimmunity (9).

136 137

The basic hypothesis of the origin of autoimmune disease depends of the emergence of a

138

clone or a small number of clones of lymphocytes capable of damaging interaction with

139

normal cells of organ or tissue involved. Each clone is initiated from a cell which has

140

developen an immune receptor adequately reactive with an accessible self-antigen as a

141

result of V/D/J and K/L gene recombination in bone marrow or during somatic

142

mutations in germinal centers. Crucially, this newly self-reactive cell (“forbidden

143

clone”) is anomalously resistant to inactivation by central and peripheral tolerance

144

check points (9)

145 146

FL B lymphocytes qualify as a malignant forbidden clone.

147

6

148

FL can be conceived as a logical and lineal development of the forbidden clone concept

149

formed within the framework of clonal selection theory. In humans, B cells develop

150

from progenitors within the BM. The stages of B cell ontogeny from pro-B to pre-B to

151

early B to mature B cell are marked by the expression of the BCR for antigen on the cell

152

surface at the early stage of B cell development. The fact that immature B cells are

153

forced to engage with the environment as a test of self-reactivity (negative selection)

154

may induce some lymphocytes to correct their self reactivity and edit their heavy or

155

light chains (receptor editing). Any normal lymphocyte capable of reacting with them

156

will be eliminated or self-reactivity corrected.

157 158

Immunoglobulin rearrangement is hierarchical. In pro-B cells, DH-JH joining precedes

159

VH-DJH rearrangement; followed by VL-JL joining in the late-stage pre-B cells.

160

Clones with an immune receptor sufficiently reactive with an available self-antigen can

161

be the result from a V/D/J gene recombination in bone marrow or during somatic

162

mutations in germinal centers. If a newly self-reactive cell (“forbidden clone”) is

163

anomalously resistant to inactivation by central and peripheral tolerance checkpoints, it

164

can produce an autoimmune disease or a lymphoid malignancy.

165 166

FL B cells qualify as a malignant forbidden clone because they carry translocation

167

t(14;18), which induces increased resistance to apoptosis, and also express self-reactive

168

BCRs, which induce chronic activation of tolerance mechanisms. Figure 1.

169 170

If we assume that the acquisition of (self-reactive) BCR is simultaneous with the

171

acquisition of genetic or molecular disturbances such as t(14;18) in FL B cells, several

172

important questions need to be answered.

7

173 174

a) Why can these B cells not be eliminated or inhibited by tolerance mechanisms?

175

b) Why can these B cells not produce their BCR as an autoantibody and induce an

176

autoimmune disease?

177

c) What is the driving force to induce genetic and molecular abnormalities in these self-

178

reactive B cells?

179 180

The essence of the FL forbidden clone concept.

181 182

On differentiation, a FL stem cell becomes a B cell carrying a specific BCR (some

183

times self-reactive BCR) that acquire the translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21) involving the

184

anti-apoptotic gene BCL2; the gene rearrangements usually involve the non-functional

185

IG gene at the 5´ end of J heavy chain (JH) gene segments, pointing to mistakes

186

occurring at the DH to JH stage in bone marrow (BM) lymphoid progenitors or in B cell

187

precursors (pro-B and pre-B cells) (10-15). This precursor B cell with t(14;18)(q32;q21)

188

is then left with the capacity to differentiate. Importantly, BCR of some FL cells can

189

potentially recognize self-antigens during their differentiation within the BM or later in

190

peripheral lymphoid organs such as lymph nodes (LN). Figure 2. For this reason, B

191

cells that acquire the translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21) during VDJ recombination in pro-

192

B, pre-B or immature B cell stages in BM must be forced to engage with environmental

193

factors as a test of self-reactivity. In human B cells, 55 to 75% of BCRs expressed by

194

early immature B cell display self-reactivity; however, the central tolerance checkpoint

195

removes the vast majority of developing self-reactive B cells (16-17). Significantly, 25-

196

30% of patients with FL express IgM or IgG with autoantibody activity (3,18,19).

197

Approximately 20% of cases of FL and mantle cell lymphoma were found to have non-

8

198

stereotyped BCRs that bind to a common self-antigen in the N-terminal region of the

199

cytoskeletal component vimentin (19). Importantly, stromal cells (20) and mesenchymal

200

stromal cells of both BM and LN actively display vimentin on their surface (20-23).

201

Notably, vimentin also is present on the surface of cells undergoing apoptosis (24). FL

202

B cells may be selected by “self-antigens” such as vimentin on the surface of apoptotic

203

cells or stromal cells in both BM and germinal centers (apoptotic blebs) within LN..

204

Surprisingly, almost all FL BCRs (much like other lymphomas) exhibit a strikingly high

205

incidence of N-glycosylation in the antigen-binding sites introduced by somatic

206

mutation (SHM) (25-27). Binding studies indicate that the oligomannose glycans

207

occupying the V regions are accessible to mannose-binding lectin (MBL) (27).

208

Remarkably, the binding of mannose-binding lectins to FL BCRs triggers B-cell

209

receptor-mediated signaling events (27). FL BCRs can bind to specific lectins on

210

dendritic cells or macrophages. We consider that FL BCRs recognize vimentin and

211

MBL on the surface of both stromal cells and apoptotic cells (19,21,22), because

212

vimentin functions as an engulfment receptor on neighboring phagocytes, which

213

recognize O-linked N-acetylglucosamine modified proteins from apoptotic cells as “eat

214

me” ligands (28). Due to the clearance of apoptotic cells that occurs in the BM and in

215

the germinal centers of LN, it is possible that FL BCRs recognize self-antigens

216

expressed in apoptotic blebs. SHM then introduces N-glycosylation in BCRs as a

217

mechanism of affinity maturation of the antibody repertoire in response to repeated

218

exposure to self-antigens (such as vimentin). Translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21) protects

219

self-reactive (vimentin)/MBL) FL cells from elimination during tolerance mechanisms.

220

Figure 3. Additionally, the presence of t(14;18)(q32;q21) converts the receptor

221

editing/revision into dangerous mechanisms that may promote progressive disease

222

(3,29,30). Figure -3. Other mechanisms such as germinal center exclusion (31-34) could

9

223

be ineffective because FL cells can migrate from LN to BM and vice versa (35). At both

224

sites, FL cells may receive BCR stimulation by stromal cells and self-antigens

225

(vimentin, MBL and apoptotic blebs). Figure 2. Abnormal tolerance checkpoints in

226

germinal centers may also play an important role and some FL B cells express IgG

227

BCRs with self-reactivity (20.4%) (19) Selection against self-reactivity during IgM

228

memory B cell development also may be compromised because self-reactive IgM+

229

memory B cells constitute 2.1% in healthy donors (34,36) compared with 3.4% in IgM

230

FL patients (19). Interestingly, the kappa light chain was more frequently expressed in

231

the IgM FL, whereas the lambda light chain was more commonly expressed in the IgG+

232

FL (19). This finding suggests that receptor editing occurs in IgG+ FL. Nevertheless,

233

under normal conditions, self-reactive normal IgG+ memory B cells may be anergic

234

(36). However, FL BCR signaling is increased and not anergic (37).

235 236

Burnet´s Rules of Tolerance and Autoimmunity in FL.

237 238

Taking advantage of the comparison with a normal linear B lymphocyte differentiation

239

we can observe that at all stages of B cell development, there is evidence that FL may

240

be induced or promoted by a persistent tolerance mechanism.

241

242

Why can these B cells not be eliminated or inhibited by tolerance mechanisms?

243 244

FL

hematopoietic

stem

cells

(38)

aberrantly

245

t(14;18)(q32;q21) in pro-B and pre-B lymphocytes (39) that tend to be intrinsically

246

resistant to apoptosis (40). In pro-B lymphocytes, DH-JH joining precedes VH-DJH

247

rearrangement, followed by VL-JL joining in late-stage pre-B lymphocytes. During

10

generate

the

translocation

248

these rearrangements, some B cells may express self-reactive BCRs that recognize self-

249

antigens (3), such as vimentin (19) or apoptotic cells. In healthy subjects, B

250

lymphocytes with t(14;18) may be primed to proliferate by surface immune receptors

251

(41) causing them to potentially recognize self-antigens (3,19). This stimulus may in the

252

future lead to an FL (42). Figure 4. In mice, the expression of a BCL2 transgene in the

253

B lymphoid compartment profoundly perturbed homeostasis and, depending on the

254

genetic background, predisposed them to a severe autoimmune disease resembling

255

human systemic lupus erythematosus (43). Notably, some normal individuals have two

256

to five unrelated t(14;18)-carrying B cell clones (44). This suggests that FL B

257

lymphocytes retain the BCR signaling capacity acquired during the pre-B cell

258

development even though they recognize self-antigens. This is also supported by the

259

fact that 30% of FL cases recognize vimentin, a ligand expressed in stromal cells and

260

apoptotic cell surfaces (29,38).

261

Moreover, FL B lymphocytes are in constant receptor editing to avoid self-reactivity,

262

and present changes from initial kappa light chain rearrangements to lambda chain

263

suggesting that receptor editing may play a role in progression to high-grade B cell

264

lymphoma (29,30,40).

265

Why can these B cells not produce their BCR as an autoantibody and induce an

266

autoimmune disease?

267 268

Peripheral tolerance.

269 270

An important peripheral checkpoint is the entry into the T lymphocyte-dependent, long-

271

term memory compartment. Lymphocytes that express antibodies encoded by the VH4-

272

34 gene are self-reactive B cells (31,32). B cells that express self-reactive BCRs

11

273

encoded by IGHV4-34 are excluded from T lymphocyte-dependent IgG memory and

274

plasma cell populations suggesting that these self-reactive lymphocytes fail to cross a

275

developmental checkpoint following activation in normal individuals (31,32). This

276

implies that negative selection of autoreactive cells occurs at the transition from naive to

277

germinal center cells. Interestingly, some FL use this self-reactive VH4-34 gene (45),

278

suggesting that peripheral tolerance mechanisms are also altered because FL B cells

279

acquire somatic mutations (SHM) in GC-like memory B cells.

280 281

Germinal centers.

282 283

Within germinal centers, naïve t(14;18)-carrying B cell clones and FL B cells undergo

284

activation, proliferation, somatic hypermutation (46,47), isotype switching (46,47) and

285

subsequent positive and negative selection by antigen (48). Importantly, germinal center

286

exclusion may be altered in FL because in healthy individuals only a very small

287

population of “FL-like B cells” remains unmutated (49). Interestingly, the class switch

288

recombination (CSR) status of FL B cells indicates a selective pressure in favor of sIgM

289

expression in a B cell population that is at the same time permanently driven to switch

290

(49,50), because in >80% of cases CSR occur in both alleles.

291 292 293

Tolerance mechanisms involved in development of memory B cells.

294 295

The t(14;18)(q32;q21) is generated during early B cell development in the BM, making

296

possible the maturation and expansion of affected cells in GC (51,52), even though they

297

recognize self-antigens such as vimentin.

12

298

Usually, B cells expressing self-reactive and broadly bacterially reactive antibodies are

299

removed from the repertoire in the transition from naive to IgM+ memory B cells (34).

300

However, rare IgM+ memory B cells that produce antibodies with low levels of self-

301

reactivity acquire this reactivity by somatic hypermutation (34). In a similar way, auto-

302

reactivity in human IgG+ memory B cells is mostly created by somatic hypermutation

303

(36). The fact that FL B cells undergo isotype switching and the acquisition of somatic

304

mutations suggests that GC check points may be disrupted in FL patients (51,52,53).

305

What is the driving force to induce genetic and molecular abnormalities in these

306

self-reactive B cells?

307 308

The tolerance mechanism may promote oncogenic transformation. (29,30,54)

309 310

Mistakes in VDJ joining may generate t(14;18) in B cells (55) of healthy individuals

311

(56). Taken together with the generation of several self-reactive BCRs during this VDJ

312

rearrangement (16-17), this provides indirect support for assuming that self-reactive

313

pre-malignant B cells with t(14;18) persist.

314 315

If this is so, it can be hypothesized that some B lymphocytes are insusceptible to

316

elimination or inhibition by the “censorship” mechanisms or that a SHM develops,

317

inducing in these B lymphocytes an undue resistance to elimination by antigenic

318

contact..

319 320

Chromosomal abnormalities and other genetic alterations in MLL2, EPHA7,

321

TNFRSF14 and EZH2 beyond t(14;18) are common in FL patients (57-65). Most FL

13

322

are characterized by recurrent secondary genetic alterations including genomic gains,

323

losses and mutations with the successive clone survival advantage (57).

324 325

We suggest that genetic programs are progressively disrupted during B cell

326

development and tolerance checkpoints.

327 328

We speculate that t(14;18) self-reactive B cells repeatedly exposed to tolerance

329

checkpoints evolve as clones and acquire genetic and chromosomal damage. These

330

changes support their survival despite various attempts by the immune system to

331

eliminate these cells. Several lines of evidence suggest that normal cells that become FL

332

lymphocytes progress through several stages before becoming overtly malignant.

333 334

The tolerogenic microenvironment induced by FL B cells

335 336

The FL B cells themselves can induce profound immunosuppression by direct contact

337

with T cells as an active immunosuppressive mechanism. Direct contact with FL

338

lymphocytes can induce a synaptic inhibition in previously healthy T lymphocytes (66)

339

and also promote the induction of regulatory T cells (67). Once that regulatory T cells

340

are generated by the FL microenvironment, they may also inhibit CD8 and CD4 T cells

341

(68,69,70). Notably, the BCR of non-malignant B cells resembles that observed in

342

mature B cells from peripheral blood of healthy subjects (71).

343 344

Bone marrow central tolerance in B cell precursors with t(14;18) (q32;q21) induce

345

a self-antigen driven clonal tumor selection.

346

14

347

The inappropriate expression of BCL2 alone seems to be insufficient for malignant

348

transformation of B cells and multistep process is required for FL development. We

349

speculate that the interaction of a pre-B cell with t(14;18) induce a cell trapped in a

350

narrow intermediate stage of maturation (to avoid self-reactivity) that maintains the

351

capacity of undergo SHM. Interestingly, B lymphopoiesis is driven by the sequential

352

rearrangement and expression of immunoglobulin heavy (Igµ) and then light

353

(Igκ followed by Igλ) chains. Each recombination constitutes a discrete transition win

354

with rearrangements capable of supporting expression of a surface receptor are selected

355

for further development. The fact that bone marrow could be the origin of FL cells and

356

induce clonal selection obligatory imply that several FL recognize bone marrow-self-

357

antigens. The fact that bone marrow central tolerance decreases the frequency of self

358

reactive B cells from 75% in BM to 20% in the circulating compartment imply that B

359

cells that recognize self-antigens were edited or deleted. However, if a B cell precursor

360

with t(14:18) (q32;q21) is forced to engage with a bone marrow self-antigen to induce

361

tolerance the result is a self-antigen driven tumor clonal selection . This is a new

362

concept in which an immune protective mechanism to avoid autoimmunity derive in a

363

lymphoid neoplasm.

364 365

Therapeutic approaches at the immunological level.

366 367

a) Immunomodulatory drugs: FL B cells may induce a tolerogenic microenvironment,

368

which may be a direct consequence of leukemic cell action (70,72). This finding

369

supports the use of immunomodulatory drugs (IMids) such as lenalidomide to

370

antagonize this defect (73-75).

371

15

372 373

b) BCR inhibitors: The fact that BCRs of FL cells have SHM and abnormal

374

glycosylation in variable regions of immunoglobulins supports the use of both novel

375

and classic treatments that can inhibit or diminish BCR signaling/recognition. BCR

376

inhibitors such as Ibrutinib, a Bruton´s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, have

377

demonstrated significant activity against FL (76-79). FL is considered to be a tumor

378

with t(14;18) in neoplastic B cells, variably stimulated following exposure to antigen in

379

lymphoid tissue. Recent evidence supports that C-type lectins, DC-SIGN and mannose

380

receptor, bound to FL surface BCR generates an intracellular Ca2+ flux (80,81), similar

381

to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B cells that have a BCR recognizing itself (self-

382

autoantibody-self BCR recognition) (82,83,84). This self-autoantibody-self BCR

383

interaction promotes survival and increases the activation of immunological tolerance

384

mechanisms such as receptor editing. These mechanisms, in turn, increase the genomic

385

instability and promote additional genetic damage (84,85). Importantly, in parallel to

386

CLL development, in FL the lectin binding generates signals via sIg, supporting an

387

antigen-independent signal in vivo (80,81). Equivalent to CLL, this lectin-induced

388

antigen-independent signal supports the immunological tolerance theory, which states

389

that it is irrelevant if the whole BCR recognizes a self-antigen or foreign antigen, as the

390

chronic activation of autonomous BCR signaling is viewed by the immune system as

391

dangerous (84,85). This is in concordance with our hypothesis considering that FL B

392

lymphocytes are persistently under check by the tolerance mechanism because they are

393

chronically exposed to self-antigens or autonomous BCR signaling. In this context, the

394

inhibition of BCR signaling is very important because it can control FL BCR signaling

395

capacity and self-antigen BCR activation. The consequence of this BCR inhibition may

16

396

be the inhibition of tolerance mechanisms such as receptor editing and a reduced risk of

397

acquiring new molecular aberrations and clonal evolution.

398 399

c) Idiotypic vaccines: The fact that idiotypic vaccines may induce specific humoral and

400

cellular immune responses against tumor idiotypes provides formal proof that humans

401

could be immunized against an antigen derived from their own tumor. However,

402

because crosstalk between follicular T cells and tumor cells in human FL promotes

403

immune evasion in the tumor microenvironment (86), it is important to design

404

treatments to eradicate the disease (87-90).

405 406

Therefore, the future of immunotherapy with vaccines seems to be in combining

407

vaccines with immunomodulators or BCR inhibitors, which maintain and enhance the

408

generated immune response, while reducing immunoregulatory mechanisms and the

409

characteristic immunosuppressive environment in patients with FL.

410 411

412

Conclusion.

413 414

We suggest that FL may be promoted by a coordinated normal immunologic tolerance

415

mechanism to destroy t(14;18) self-reactive B cells. Additional genetic damage induced

416

by tolerance mechanisms may immortalize and transform a t(14;18) self-reactive B cell

417

into a lymphomatous one. The result of tolerogenic mechanisms and genetic aberrations

418

is the survival of FL B cell clones with similar markers and homogenous gene

419

expression signatures, despite the different stages of maturation at which the molecular

420

damage occurs. It is possible that BCR signaling inhibitors may correct the

17

421

immunological disturbances blocking the stimuli that induce chronic activation of

422

tolerance mechanisms in FL B-lymphocytes. Combinations of vaccines with IMids or

423

BCR inhibitors may overcome the immunosuppressive microenvironment induced by

424

FL B cells and generate a sustained immunosurveillance to eradicate minimal residual

425

disease in some FL patients.

426 427 428 429 430

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438

Corresponding author: +Ricardo García-Muñoz MD E-mail: [email protected]. +Hematology Service. Hospital San Pedro. c/Piqueras 98 Logroño, La Rioja 26006 Spain Phone n: + 34 941 29 89 12

439 440

Figure 1. FL is a malignancy of cells that acquire both t(14;18) and self-BCR, inducing

441

them to proliferate and mature.

442 443

Figure 2. The BCR of some t(14;18)-carrying cells can potentially recognize self-

444

antigens during their differentiation within the BM or later in peripheral lymphoid

445

organs, such as lymph nodes. Germinal center exclusion may be critical in the

446

protection against the transformation of self-reactive t(14;18) B cells into follicular

447

lymphoma B cells.

448 449 450

Figure 3. LF t(14;18)(q32;q21) protect self-reactive (vimentin/MBL) FL cells from

451

elimination

452

t(14;18)(q32;q21) converts the receptor editing/revision into dangerous mechanisms

453

that may promote progressive disease because they induce genetic instability. This

454

process has been reported in patients with FL during idiotypic vaccine treatment.

during

tolerance

mechanisms.

18

Additionally,

the

presence

of

455 456

Figure 4. B lymphocytes with t(14;18) in healthy subjects may be primed to proliferate

457

by surface immune receptors, causing them to potentially recognize self-antigens (3,34).

458

This stimulus may in the future lead to an FL by chronic activation of the BCR and

459

immunologic tolerance through receptor editing/revision. Diversification mechanisms,

460

such as SHM and Ig class switch, also contribute to genetic instability and

461

transformation.

462 463

References.

464 465 466

1. In Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Systems, 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC;2008.

467

2. Harris NL, de Leval L, Ferry JA. Follicular Lymphoma. In Hematopatology,

468

edited by Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Vardiman JW, Campo E, Arber DA (eds). 1st ed.

469

Elsevier Saunders: 2011; pp 267.

470

3. Sachen KL, Strohman MJ, Singletary J, Alizadeh AA, Kattah, Lossos C, et al.

471

Self-antigen recognition by follicular lymphoma B cell receptors. Blood

472

2012;120:4182-90

473 474

4. Gascoyne RD. Follicular lymphoma. In The Lymphoid Neoplasms, edited by Magrath IT, Bathia K, Boffeta P, et al. 3rd ed. Hodder Arnold :2010;pp513.

475

5. Wang JH, Alt FW, Gostissa M, Murphy M, Alimzhanov MB, et al, Oncogenic

476

transformation in the absence of Xrcc4 targets peripheral B cells that have

477

undergone editing and switching. J Exp Med. 2008;205:3079-3090

478 479

6. García-Muñoz R, Galiacho VR, Llorente L. Immunological aspects in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) development. Ann Hematol. 2012;91:981-96.

480

7. García-Muñoz R, Panizo C, Bendandi M, Llorente L. Autoimmunity and

481

lymphoma: is mantle cell lymphoma a mistake of the receptor editing

482

mechanism? Leuk Res 2009;33:1437-9.

483 484 485 486

8. LuningPrak ET, Monestier M, Eisenberg RA. B cell receptor editing in tolerance and autoimmunity. Ann N Y AcadSci 2011;1217:96-121 9. Burnet M. Tolerance and Paralysis. In Auto-immunity and Auto-immune Disease. Medical and Technical Publishing CO LTD; 1972. Pp.59

19

487

10. Martinez-Climent JA, Fontan L, Gascoyne RD, Siebert R, Prosper F.

488

Lymphoma stem cells: enough evidence to support their existence?

489

Haematologica 2010;95:293-302

490

11. Raghvan SC, Swanson PC, Wu X, Hsie CL, Lieber MR. A non B DNA structute

491

at BCL-2 major breakpoint region cleaved by RAG complex. Nature

492

2004;428:88-93

493 494 495 496

12. Willis TG, Dyer MJ. The role of immunoglobulin traslocations in the pathogenesis of B cell malignancies. Blood 200;96:808-22 13. Busslinger M. Transcriptional control of early B cell development. Ann Rev Immunol 2004;22:55-79

497

14. Stamatopoulos K, Kosmas C, Belesi C, Papadaki T, Afendaki S, Anagnostou D,

498

et al. t(14;18) chromosomal traslocation in follicular lymphoma: an event

499

occurring with almost equal frequency both at D to J(H) and at later stages in the

500

rearrangement process of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Br J Haematol

501

1997;99:866-72

502

15. Jager U, Bocskor S, Le T, Mitterbauer G, Bolz I, Chott A, et al, Follicular

503

lymphomas BCL-2/IGH junctions contain template nucleotide insertions: novel

504

insights into the mechanism of t(14;18) traslocation. Blood 2000;95:3520-9

505

16. Wardemann H, Yurasov S, Schaefer A, Young JW, Meffre E, Nussenzweig MC.

506

Predominant autoantibody production by early human B cell precursors. Science

507

2003;301:1374-7

508

17. Yurasov S, Wardemann H, Hammersen J, Tsuiji M, Meffre E, Pascual V,

509

Nussenszweig MC. Defective B cell tolerance checkpoints in systemic lupus

510

erythematosus. J Exp Med 2005;201:703-711.

511

18. Dighiero G, Hart S, Lim A, Borche L, Levy R, Miller RA. Autoantibody activity

512

of immunoglobulins isolated from B cell follicular lymphomas. Blood

513

1991;78:581-585.

514

19. Cha SC, Qin H, Kannan S, Rawal S, Walkins LS, Baio FE et al. Nonstereotyped

515

lymphomas B cell receptors recognize vimentin as a shared autoantigen. J

516

Immunol 2013;190:4887-98

517

20. Binder M, Léchenne B, Ummanni R, Sharf C, Balabanov S, Trusch M, et al.

518

Stereotypical chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cell receptors recognize survival

519

promoting antigens on stromal cells. PloS One 2010;5:e15992

20

520

21. Guilloton F, Caron G, Menard C, Pangault C, Amé-Thomas P, Dulong J, et al.

521

Mesenchymal stromal cells orchestrate follicular lymphoma cell niche through

522

the CLL2-dependent recruitment and polarization of monocytes. Blood

523

2012;119:2556-2567.

524

22. Amé-Thomas P, Maby-EL Hajjami H, Monvoisin C, Jean R, Monnier D, Caulet-

525

Maugendre S, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells isolated from bone marrow

526

and lymphoid organs support B-cell growth: role of stromal cells in follicular

527

lymphoma pathogenesis. Blood 2007;109:693-702

528

23. Panepucci RA, Siufi JL, Silva WA, Proto-Siquiera R, Neder L, Orellana M, et

529

al. Comparison of gene expression of umbilical cord vein and bone marrow-

530

derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2004;22:1263-78

531

24. Lanemo-Myhrinder A, Hellqvist E, Sidorova E, Söderberg A, Baxendale H,

532

Dahle C, et al. A new perspective: molecular motifs on oxidized LDL, apoptotic

533

cells, and bacteria are targets for chronic lymphocytic leukemia antibodies.

534

Blood 2008;111:3838-48

535

25. Zhu D, McCarthy H, Ottensmeier C, Johnson P, Hamblin T, Stevenson FK.

536

Acquisition of potential N-glycosylation sites in the inmmunoglobulin variable

537

region by somatic mutation is a distinctive feature of follicular lymphoma.

538

Blood 2002;99:2562-2568.

539

26. Radcliffe CM, Arnold JN, Suter DM, Wormald MR, Harvey DJ, Royle L, et al.

540

Human Follicular lymphoma cells contain oligomannoseglycans in the antigen-

541

binding site of the B cell receptor. J BiolChem 2007;282:7405-7415

542

27. Coelho V, Krysov S, Ghaemmaghami AM, Emara M, Potter KN, Johnson P, et

543

al. Glycosylation of surface Ig creates a functional bridge between human

544

follicular lymphoma and microenvironmentallectins. ProcNatlAcadSci USA

545

2010;107:18587-92

546

28. Ise H, Goto M, Komura K, Akaike T. Engulfment and clearance of apoptotic

547

cells based on a GlcNAc-binding lectin-like property of surface vimentin.

548

Glycobiology. 2012;22:788-805

549

29. Kobrin C, Cha SC Qin H, Raffeld M, Fend F, Wuintanilla-Martinez L, Grove S,

550

et al. Molecular analysis of light-chain switch and acute lymphoblastic leukemia

551

transformation in two follicular lymphomas: implications for lymphomagenesis.

552

Leuk Lymphoma 2006;47:1523-34.

21

553

30. Yonetani N, Ueda C, Akasaka T, Nishikori M, Uchiyama T, Ohno H.

554

Heterogeneous breakpoints on the immunoglobulin genes are involved in fusion

555

5´region of BCL-2 in B cell tumors. Jpn J Cancer Res 2001;92:933-40

556

31. Cappione A 3rd, Anolik JH, Pugh-Bernard A, Barnard J, Dutcher P, Silverman

557

G, Sanz I. Germinal center exclusion of autoreactive B cells is defective in

558

human systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest 2005;115:3205-16.

559

32. Pugh-Bernard AE, Silverman GJ, Cappione AJ, Villano ME, Ryan DH, Insel

560

RA, Sanz I. Regulation of inherently autoreactive VH4-34 B cells in the

561

maintenance of human B cell tolerance. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:1061-70.

562

33. Matejuk A, Beardall M, Xy Y, Tian Q, Phillips D, Alabyev B, et al. Exclusion of

563

natural autoantibody-producing B cells from IgG memory B cell compartment

564

during T cell-dependent immune response. J Immunol. 2009;182:7634-43

565

34. Tsuiji M, Yurasov S, Velinzon K, Thomas S, Nussenzeig MC, Wardemann H. A

566

checkpoint for autoreactivity in human IgM+ memory B cell development. J

567

Exp Med 2006;203:393-400.

568

35. Bognar A, Csernus B, Bödör C, Reininger L, Szepesi A, Toth E, et al. Clonal

569

selection in bone marrow involvement of follicular lymphoma. Leukemia

570

2005;19:1656-1662.

571 572

36. Tiller T, Tsuiji M, Yurasov S, Velinzon K, Nussensweig MC, Wardemann H. Autoreactivity in human IgG+ memory B cells. Immunity 2007;26:205-13.

573

37. Irish J, Czerwinski DK, Nolan GP, Levy R. Altered B cell receptor signaling

574

kinetics distinguish human follicular lymphoma B cells from tumor-infiltrating

575

nonmalignant B cells. Blood 2006;108:3135-3142.

576 577

38. Weigert O, Weinstock DM. The evolving contribution of hematopoietic progenitor cells to lymphomagenesis. Blood 2012;120:2553-2561.

578

39. MejerinkJP,RaemaekersJM,Mensink EJ. New Type of t(14;18) in a non-

579

Hodgkin´s lymphoma provides insight in molecular events in early B-cell

580

differentiation. Br J Haematol 1995;91:630-9.

581

40. Mannouji K, Tasaka T Akiyama T, Irei I, Sano F, Matsuhuashi Y, et al.

582

Transformation

583

lymphoma/leukemia with additional t(2;8)(p12;q24) with inverse expressions of

584

c-MYC and BCL-2 and light chain switch. Pathol Int 2009;59:261-4

585 586

from

follicular

lymphoma

to

high

grade

B

cell

41. Staudt LM. A closer look at follicular lymphoma. N engl J Med 2007;356:741742

22

587

42. Bretherick KL, Bu R, Gascoyne R, Connors JM, Spinelli JJ, Brooks-Wilson AR.

588

Elevated circulating t(14;18) traslocation levels prior to diagnosis of follicular

589

lymphoma. Blood 2013;116:6146-6147

590

43. Cory S, Harris AW, Strasser A. Insights from transgenic mice regarding the role

591

of bcl-2 in normal and neoplastic lymphoid cells. Philos Trans SocLond B

592

BiolSci 1994;345:289-95

593

44. Limpens J, Stad R, Vos C, de Vlaam C, de Jong D, van Ommen GJ, Schuurig E,

594

Kluin PM. Lymphoma-associated translocation t(14;18) in blood B cells of

595

normal individuals. Blood 1995;89:2528-36.

596

45. Sato Y, Ichimura K, Tanaka T, Takata K, Morito T, Sato H, Kondo E, et al.

597

Duodenal follicular lymphomas share common characteristic with mucosa-

598

associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas. J Clin Pathol 2008;61:377-81.

599

46. Aarts WM, Bende RJ, Seenbergen EJ, Kluin PM, Ooms EC, Pals ST, et al.

600

Variable heavy chain gene analysis of follicular lymphomas: correlation

601

between heavy chain isotype expression and somatic mutation load. Blood

602

2000;95;2922-9

603

47. Kadowaki N, Hayashi T, Amakawa R, Akasaka T, Yabumoto K, Ohno H, et al.

604

Class switch recombination of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene frequently

605

occurs in B cell lymphomas associated rearrangement of the BCL2 gene. Int J

606

Hematol 1995;61:69-75.

607 608

48. Zalenetz AD, Chen TT, Levy R. Clonal expansion in follicular lymphoma occurs subsequent to antigenic selection. J Exp Med 1992;176:1137-48

609

49. Roulland S, Navarro JM, Grenot P, Milili M, Agopian J, Bertrand M, et al.

610

Follicular lymphoma like B cells in healthy individuals: a novel intermediate

611

step in early lymphomagenesis. J Exp Med 2006;203:2425-24-31.

612

50. Vanandrager JW, Schuuring E, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Dyer MJ, Raap AK, et al.

613

DNA fiber fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of immunoglobulin class

614

switching in B cell neoplasia: aberrant CH gene rearrangement in follicle center

615

lymphoma. Blood 1998;92:2871-2878

616

51. Hirt C, Dölken G, Janz S, Rabkin CS. Distribution of t(14;18) positive, putative

617

lymphoma precursor cell among B cell subsets in healthy individuals. Br J

618

Haematol 2007;138:349-53

619 620

52. Roulland S, Faroudi M, Mamessier E, Sungalee S, Salles G, Nadel B. Early steps of follicular lymphoma pathogenesis. Adv Immunol 2011;111:1-46.

23

621

53. Paqualucci L, Bhagat G, Jankovic M, Compagno M, Smith P, Muramatsu M, et

622

al. Aid is required for germinal center-derived lymphomagenesis. Nat Genet

623

2008;40:108-112.

624

54. Wang JH, Alt FW, Gostissa M, Murphy M, Alimzhanov MB, et al. Oncogenic

625

transformation in the absence of Xrcc4 targets peripheral B cells that have

626

undergone editing and switching. J Exp Med. 2008;205:3079-3090.

627

55. Tsujimoto Y, Gorham J, Cossman J, Jaffe E, Croce CM The t(14;18)

628

chromosome translocations involved in B-cell neoplasms result from mistakes in

629

VDJ joining . Science 1985;229:1390-1393.

630

56. Dolken G, Illerhaus G, Hirt C, Mertelsmann R. BCL-2/JH rearrangements in

631

circulating B cells of healthy blood of normal individuals. Bloos 1995;85:2528-

632

2536

633 634

57. Kridel R, Sehn LH, Gascoyne RD. Pathogenesis of follicular lymphoma. J Clin Invest 2012;122:34-24-3431

635

58. Cheung KJ, Johnson NA, Affleck JG, Severson T, Steidl C, Ben-Neriah S, et al.

636

Aquired TNFRSF14 mutations in follicular lymphoma are associated with worse

637

prognosis. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9166-74.

638

59. Launay E, Pangault C, Bertand P, Jardin F, Mamy T, Tilly H, et al. High rate of

639

TNFRSF14 gene alteration related to 1p36 region in de novo follicular

640

lymphoma and impact on prognosis. Leukemia 2012;26:559-62

641

60. Dawson DW, Hong JJS, Shen RR, French SW, Troke JJ , Wu YZ, et al. Global

642

DNA methylation profiling reveals silencing of a secreted form of Epha7 in

643

mouse and human germinal center B cell lymphomas. Oncogene 2007;26:4243-

644

52

645

61. Morin RD, Mendez-Lago M, Mungall AJ, Coya R, Mungal KL, Corbett RD, et

646

al. Frequent mutation of histone modifying genes in non Hodgkin lymphoma.

647

Nature 2011;476:298-303.

648

62. Pasqualucci L, Dominguez-Sola D, Chiarenza A, Fabbri G, Grunn A,

649

TrifonovV,et al. Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B cell

650

lymphoma. Nature 2011;471:189-95.

651

63. Morin RD, Johnson NA, Severson TM, Mungall AJ, An J, Goya R, et al.

652

Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B cell

653

lympohmas of germinal-center origin. Nat Genet 2010;42:181-5.

24

654

64. Yap DB, Chu J, Berg T, Schapira M, Chen SW, Moradian A, et al. Somatic

655

mutations at EZH2 Y641 act dominantly through a mechanism of selective

656

altered PCR2 catalytic activity, to increase H3K27 trimethylation. Blood 2011;

657

117:2451-9.

658

65. Van Galen JC, Dukers DF, Giroth C, Sewalt RG, Otte AP, Meijer CJ, et al.

659

Distinct expression patterns of polycomboncoproteins and their binding partners

660

during germinal center reaction. Eur J Immunol 2004;34:1870-81

661

66. Ramsay AG, Clear AJ, Kelly G, Fatah R, Matthews J, Macdougall F, et al.

662

Follicular lymphoma cells induce T cell immunologic synapse dysfunction that

663

can be repaired with lenalidomide: implications for the tumor microenvironment

664

and immunotherapy. Blood 2009;114:4713-20.

665

67. Ai WZ, Novak AJ, Hou JZ, Zeizer R, Czerwinski D, NegrinRs, Levy R.

666

Follicular lymphoma B cells induce the conversion of conventional CD4+ T

667

cells to T regulatory cells. Int J Cancer 2009;124:239-244

668

68. Yang ZZ, Novak AJ, Stenson MJ, Witzing TE, Ansell SM, Intratumoral

669

CD4+CD25+regulatory T cell mediated suppression of infiltrating CD4+T cells

670

in B cell non Hodking lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:3639-3646.

671

69. Yang ZZ, Novak AJ, Ziesmer SC, Witzing TE. Ansell SM. Attenuation of

672

CD8(+) T cell function by CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in B cell non-

673

Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Res 2006;66:1045-10152.

674

70. Kiali S, Clear AJ, Ramsay AG, Davies D, Sangaralingam A, Lee A, et al.

675

Follicular lymphoma cells induce changes in T cell gene expression and

676

function: potential impact on survival and risk of transformation. J ClinOncol

677

2013;31:2654-61

678

71. Irish JM, Czerwinski DK, Nolan GP, Levy R. Altered B cell receptor signaling

679

kinetics distinguish human Follicular lymphoma B cells from tumor infiltrating

680

nonmalignant B cells. Blood 2006;108:3135-3142.

681

72. Dorfman DM, Schultze JL, Shahsafaei A, Michalak S, Gribben JG, Freeman GJ,

682

et al. In vivo expression of B7-1 and B7-2 by follicular lymphoma cells can

683

prevent induction of T cell anergy but is insufficient to induce significant T cell

684

proliferation. Blood 1997;90:4297-306.

685

73. Rawal S, Fowler N, Zhan M, et al. Activation of T and NK cells following

686

lenalidomide therapy in patients with Follicular lymphoma. Blood (ASH Annual

687

Meeting Abstracts) 2012;120:2766.

25

688

74. Fowler NH, Neelapu SS, Hagemeister FB, Mclaughlin P, Kwak L, Romaguera

689

JE, et al. Lenalidomide and Rituximab for untreated indolent lymphoma: Final

690

results of a phase II study. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts)

691

2012;120:901

692

75. Qi L, Yu C, Li XD, O´Donnell R, Tuscano J. Correlative analysis and clinical

693

update of a phase II study using lenalidomide and Rituximab in patients with

694

indolent Non-Hodkgin Lymphoma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts)

695

2013;122:250.

696

76. Blum KA, Christian B, Flynn JM, et al. A phase I treal of the Bruton´s tyrosine

697

kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in combination with Rituximab (

698

R ) and Bendamustine in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hoddkin´s

699

lymphoma (NHL). [abstract]. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts).

700

2012;120:1643.

701

77. Fowler NH, de Vos S, Schreeder MT, et al. Combinations of the

702

phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase –delta (PI3K[delta]) inhibitor GS-1101 (CAL-101)

703

with rituximab and/or Bendamustine are tolerable in previously treated, indolent

704

non-Hodgkin lymphoma results from a phae I study. [abstract]. Blood (ASH

705

Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2012;120:3645.

706

78. Fowler N, Advani RH, Sharman J, Smith SM, McGreivy J, Kunkel L, Trough V,

707

et al. The Bruton´s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) is active and

708

Tolerated in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting

709

Abstracts) 2012:120:156

710

79. Kheirallah S, Caron O, Gross E, Quillet-Mary A, Bertrand-Michel J, Fournié JJ,

711

et al. Rituximab inhibits B cell receptor signaling. Blood 2010;115:985-994.

712

80. Linley A, Krysov S, Ponzoni M, Johnson PW, Packham G, Stevenson FK.

713

Lectin binding to surface Ig variable regions provides a universal persistent

714

activating signal for follicular lymphoma cells. Blood 2015.

715

81. Schneider D, Dühren-von Minden M, Alkhatib A, Setz C, van Bergen CA,

716

Benkiber-Petersen M, et al. Lectins from opportunistic bacteria interact with

717

acquired variable-region glycans of surface immunoglobulin in follicular

718

lymphoma. Blood 2015;125:3287-96.

719

82. Dühren-von Minden M, Übelhart R, Schneider D, Wossning T, Bach MP,

720

Buchner M, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is driven by antigen

721

independent cell-autonomous signalling. Nature 2012;489:309-12

26

722

83. Meixlsperger S, Köhler F, Wossning T, Reppel M, Müschen M, Jumaa H.

723

Conventional light chains inhibit the autonomous signaling capacity of the B

724

cell receptor. Immunity 2007;26:323-33.

725 726 727

84. García-Muñoz R, Feliu J, Llorente L. The top ten clues to understand the origin of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). J Autoimmun 2015;56:81-6 85. García-Muñoz

R,

Llorente

L.

Chronic

lymphocytic

leukemia: could

728

immunological tolerance mechanisms be the origin of lymphoid neoplasms?

729

Immunology 2014;142:536-40

730

86. Rawal S, Chu F, Zhang M, Park HJ, Nattamai D, Kannan S, et al. Cross talk

731

between follicular Th cells and tumor cells in human follicular lymphoma

732

promotes immune evasion in the tumor microenvironment. J Immunol

733

2013;190:6681-93.

734 735

87. Bendandi M. Aiming at a curative strategy for follicular lymphoma CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:305-17

736

88. Bendandi M, Gocke CD, Kobrin CB et al. Complete molecular remissions

737

induced by patient specific vaccination plus granulocyte monocyte colony

738

stimulating factor against lymphoma. Nat Med 1999;5:1171.1177

739

89. Inogés S, Rodriguez-Calvillo M, Zabalegui N, et al. Clinical benefit associated

740

with idiotype vaccination in patients with follicular lymphoma J Natl Cancer

741

Inst 2006;98:1292-301.

742 743

90. Longo DL. Idiotype vaccination in follicular lymphoma; knocking on the doorway to cure. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1263-1265.

744

27

pro-B cell

BONE MARROW pre-B cell

V/D/J rearrangement

K/l rearrangement

BCL-2

Immature B cell BCL-2

T(14;18)(q32;q21) BCL-2

V/D/J recombination generates t(14;18)(q32;q21) and self-reactive B cell receptor

stem cell

pro-B cell

BONE MARROW pre-B cell

V/D/J rearrangement

K/l rearrangement

t(14;18)

t(14;18)

immature-B cell

t(14;18)

BLOOD T(14;18)

t(14;18)

t(14;18)

t(14;18) follicular B cell

memory Secondary lymphoid organs B cell /follicular lymphoma

t(14;18)

Mechanism for receptor editing in follicular lymphoma

self-reactive B cells

kappa + self-reactive B cells t(14;18)

t(14;18)

genetic instability

t(14;18)

t(14;18)

lambda + self-reactive B cells

self-reactive t(14;18) B cells acquire BCL-2/IGL kappa or BCL2/IGL lambda junctions by receptor secondary acute lymphoblastic leukemia or FL progression. editing mechanism

T(14;18)

self-reactive B cell with t(14;18) with immunologic tolerance and apoptotic resistance