Motion of a ball in a ball bearing

Motion of a ball in a ball bearing

WEAR MOTION OF A BALL F. HIRANO K_@shii IN A BALL BEARING* AND H. TANOUE University, (Received I77 Fukuoka October IO, (Japan) 1960) SUMM...

2MB Sizes 1 Downloads 95 Views

WEAR

MOTION

OF A BALL F. HIRANO K_@shii

IN A BALL

BEARING*

AND H. TANOUE

University,

(Received

I77

Fukuoka

October

IO,

(Japan) 1960)

SUMMARY A magnetized ball rolling in a ball bearing induces an alternating current in a coil wound on the outer ring. The period of the current represents one revolution of the ball. Deviation from ideal motion of the ball occurs as slip and spin. The former is shown by the prolongation of the period. The latter causes fluctuation of the rolling axis relative to the magnetic axis of the ball. It can be easily estimated by measuring the variation of the amplitude of the current. Under radial load a considerable slip occurs at the unloaded side. It is found that the slip decreases exponentially with increase in speed. The magnitude and the direction of load, the lubicating condition and the radial clearance also affect the slip. In the special case where the ratio of the number of revolutions of the ball to that of the cage becomes nearly equal to an integral value, the deviation of the rolling axis shows a sharp increase, which often exceeds 70”. This deviation is due to the spinning motion of the ball during slipping. ZUSAMMESFASSUNG Eine in einem Kugellager rotierende magnetisierte Kugel induziert einen Wechselstrom in einer urn den Aussenring gewickelten Spule. Die Periode des Stroms entspricht einer Rotation der Kugel. Abweichung von der idealen Bewegung der Kugel entsteht in zwei Formen: Gleiten und Kreiselbewegung. Gleiten wird sichtbar an einer Verlangerung der Periode. Die Kreiselbewegung verursacht eine relative Schwankung der Drehachse zur magnetischen Achse der Kugel und ist durch Messung der Veranderung der Amplitude des Stromes leicht zu finden. Bei Radialbelastung tritt an der unbelasteten Seite ein betrachtliches Gleiten ein, das mit zunehmender Rotationsgeschwindigkeit rasch abnimmt. Ferner wird Gleiten durch GrSsse und Richtung der Belastung, durch den Schmierzustand und die Radialspielung des Lagers beeinflusst. Wenn das Verhlltniss der Drehzahl der Kugel zu der des Kafigs annahrend gleich einer ganze Zahl ist, nimmt die Richtungslnderung der Drehachse erheblich iu, manchmali mehr als 70”. Ursache ist das Auftreten einer Kreiselbewegung der Kugel beim Gleiten. INTRODUCTION

The motion motion.

of rolling

Depending

elements

on operating

in a rolling conditions,

deviation

should have an important

elements.

Therefore,

basic information bearing,

because

deviates

influence upon the friction,

an investigation

on rolling bearings. observation

bearing

somewhat

wear and life of rolling

of the motion of rolling elements The situation

of the motion

from ideal

slip and spinning motion take place. This is required

for

is simple in the case of a roller

is easy. HAMPP~

reported

the results

of

* Published in Japanese in J. Japan. Sm. Lubrication Engrs., 5 (1960) 175 and Tvans. Japan. Sot. Mech. Engrs., 27 (1961) (in the press). The last section of the paper has not been published previously. IFear, 4 (1961) r77-197

17s

1:. t111<.\\0,

measurement capacitance.

of the motion of rollers in ;I connecting

tracing

motion

on the other

and observation

previously

the motion

and special

rod bearing 1,~. mr~ans of ~~ai-iabl~~

and analyst$d the slip of the roller.

In the cast’ of ball bearings, dimensional

l.\SOl’l~.

SasitKrz recorded the locus of a point on the edge of 3 roller I)\. using 311

optical method,

the authors

I-1.

reported

of the motion

that a magnetized

of the balls.

attention

hand, balls have the freedom

Recently

becomes

more difficult.

ball could successfully

the experiments

has been given to the spinning

of t lm.t?-

hail

motion

One ot

I9c used

for

been rtbsumecl ant1

of balls.

The present

paper deals mainly with the results under radial load. The case of thrust ant1 cmnbinml load is now under investigation

and will be reported .S(~MET<‘I . A

=

am~iit~de

,>

on

later.

YI-I’RE

of oscillo~~m

(mm)

=

residual magnetism

1

shaft speed or speed of inner ring (revjminj

of ball {C)

=

load (kg)

=- radius of inner raceway

(mm)

.= radius of outer raceway

(mm)

:

mean slip r’,;)

--

number of revolutions

=

number

of ball relative to cage (rev/mm)

of revolutions

of cage or number of revolutions

of ball

ccntre (rev/mm) :

frequency

=

radius of ball (mm)

of fluctuation

of amplitude

(c/minj

= angle between rolling axis and magnetic

axis of ball (deg.)

--_ change oflw (deg.) =

phase shift of a definite point ou the ball for each revolution

of

the cage {radians) =

angular displacemel~t of spin (radians or deg.)

=

theoretical

angular

velocity

of the ball relative

to

the

cage

to thr

cage

(radian/set) --= actual

mean angular

velocity

of the ball relative

(radian/set) =

theorc?tical

=

actual mean angular velocity

angular

velocity

=

circular frequency

the motion

of cage or ball centrc

of fluctuation

EXPERIMENTAL

In order to observe

of cage or halt centrc

(ra~ia~~~s~~~) (radianjsec)

of (?c(radianjsec)

METHOD

of a ball in a ball bearing

without

disturbance,

change in flux due to the rolling motion

of the magnetized

The bearing steel is sufficiently

for this purpose. When the magnetized

inserted

magnetic

into a pocket hole of the cage is rolling between

ball has been observed.

the raceways

ball

the magnetic

MOTION

poles also revolve. current

Consequently,

the change in magnetic

I79

flux induces an alternating

in the circuit of the coil wound on the outer ring, as shown in Fig. I. The in-

duced current current

OF A BALL IN A BALL BEARING

is recorded on an oscillograph.

corresponds

Comparing

to the period

the frequency

As will be shown later, the period of the

of the rotation

of the ball relative

to the cage.

of the actual change in flux with the ideal one, the rate of

Ip

Fig. 1. Principle of mcasurcmcnt.

Fig. 2. Bearing testing machine. B, Bearing; C, Bakelite cover; D, Drop-feed oiling tube; I;, Frame of loading apparatus; LI, Loading lever; TA, Lever for measuring friction; M, Magnet

slip is easily estimated. maximum vanishes,

Moreover,

when the magnetic however,

can be estimated

the amplitude

of the current

axis is perpendicular

when both axes coincide.

from the fluctuations

is found to be at the

to the rolling axis. The current

Thus, the angle oc between

the two axes

in amplitude. Wear,

L+

(1961) I,~-I~T

IS0

I;. HIH,\;VO,

H. 'T:\KOl'E

E‘xperimental conditions The bearing

tester

with the parallellogram

lever system

shown in Fig. z was usc~l

for radial loads below 300 kg and for speeds below 5,000 revjmin. were carried below

out mainly

goo rev/min

bearings

kg. For thrust

system

at the rate of

of lubricant

were also used. The bearing loading apparatus,

IOO

the loading

were lubricated

find the influence

under

IO

of the four-ball

with the bakelite I

tester

was available.

Thc~

cc/min, mainly with spindle oil. In order to

upon the motion

as shown in Figs.

The experiments

loads below 92 kg and for speeds

of the ball, cylinder

oil and greascl

bobbin was fitted into the frame of the

and 2. The outer ring was fixed with the bakclitc>

cover plates.

HEARINGSUSE” IN THE EXPERIMEh'TS

so.

6307

3.5 x 80 x 21

No.

7307

3,j X

X0

X

21

solid brass pressed steel

17132 * s

solid brass

17/32 x 1 I x ‘3

I?/32

cageless

s!,,. G30i;

30 x 72 x rg

pressed steel

3’/04

No.

40 x 80 x

pressed steel

I5/32 x 9

6208

18

x 8

* Theoretical values (~b*/m* calculated by using Rz/r. The bearings experiments

used in the present research

are listed in Table I. The main part of the

was carried out on the deep-grooved

brass solid cage. Its radial clearance

bearing

No. 6307 furnished

with a

was zz ,u.

Magfletization of ball In order to obtain a cha!ge

in flux strong enough to be recorded on the oscillogram,

it is necessary

to give the ball a residual magnetism

coil consisted

of 460 turns of copper wire,

diameter,

34 mm inner diameter,

1.8

of about 200 G. The magnetizing

mm diam.

and is 95 mm in length).

(the coil has 76 mm outer The ball to be magnetized

was placed at the centre of the coil and then the magnetizing

0

Fig. 3.

20

current

60 I (n) magnetism of 17/32 in. ball plotted against magnetizing

was applied for

40

current (I A =

ho

Oc)

MOTION OF A BALL IN A BALL BEARING z seconds. Fig. 3 shows the residual magnetism against

the magnetizing

current.

applying a current exceeding

181

B, of the ball (17/32 in. diam.) plotted

The necessary

value B, = 200 G was obtained

by

50 A. Balls of various other sizes were also magnetized

to

the same value. Scatter

of this residual magnetism

residual magnetism of the

bearing.

running

5

was reduced to a sufficiently

was found to decrease

Calibrating

experiments

104 revolutions

narrow range. The

from its initial value during the operation ceased

after

of the inner ring and that the final value became

showed

that

the

decrease

B, =

140 G, i.e. 7oyb of the initial value under radial load above IOO kg. Therefore,

in order

to obtain

at least

reliable results,

the experiments

must be carried out after running

5 . 10~ revolutions. Recording of rotation of the ball In order to facilitate

the mounting

and dismounting

of the magnetized

pieces of the cage were fixed with tap bolts of small diameter. consisted

of 200 turns of enamelled

as shown in Fig. I. The bobbin

ball, both

The measuring

wire, 0.3 mm diam., wound on a bakelite

was fitted into the space between

coil

bobbin,

the outer ring and

the frame of the loading apparatus. The coil was led to the vibrator current

had a constant

The number of revolutions steel piece attached

of the electromagnetic

sensitivity

to the cage with the non-magnetic

poles of the magnet

The induced

range o-200

of the cage was recorded using a fixed magnet

and 2. The change of flux induced at the moment revolutions

oscillograph.

of 30 mm/mA in the frequency

served

to record

bridge,

Hz.

and a small

as shown in Figs.

I

when the steel piece passed by the

the revolutions

of the cage. The number

of

of the inner ring or shaft was also measured by the same method.

Prelim.inary experiment Owing to the freedom rolling axis relative fore to determine

of three-dimensional

to the magnetic

the angle a between

purpose the following preliminary Balls

of the bearing

go’ were prepared. and inserted

No. 6307

with

Fig. 4 shows examples (a) gives the maximum

however, amplitude function

definite

angles a = o’, 22.5’,

and for this 45”, 67.5” and

in the preliminary

flux change corresponding with that of the rotation

the flux change is negligibly A is proportional

1(b).

Thus,

like a roller in a roller bearing. experiment.

Oscillogram

to 01 = 90~. The slight fluctuation

is caused by the slip of the ball at the unloaded coincides

to the ball

the cage, as shown in Fig.

and it behaved

of the oscillograms

of its there-

was carried out.

The rolling axis was formed by short wires soldered

the motion of the ball was constrained

the fluctuation

of the ball, the position

the axes from the oscillogram,

experiment

into small holes drilled through

of the amplitude

motion

axis can change with time. It is necessary

side. The period of

of the cage. In the case of (x: = o’,

small, as shown in (c). It was found that the

to sin ix at constant

speed.

of the shaft speed N. Hence, for other bearings

Fig. 5 shows A /sin cy as a the measurements

were car-

ried out only for o( = 90~. Wenr, 4

(1961)

177-197

Denoting

the angular

of the measuring

\~elocity of the ball relati\,r to the cagt’, tire numh~r oi tinII>

coil, its resistance

the half amplitude

and inductance

1~~.PIN, ic, I\’ and I,, rrspectivel\-

of the induced current can be written as Ii,

iiWi,(lJl,’, II) I~il.C~hi2

11

50

ii20 A : $10 8 6 5

where 00 is the amplitude proportional

of the effective

to sin 0~). These results

residual magnetism

could be detected.

into 10 mA using the sensitivity

flux change

were obtained

In Fig. 5 the amplitude

unloaded side, owing to slip, the amplitude (I). On

to the coil (@CIis decrease

in the

4 mm is also converted

30 mm/mA of the vibrator.

Since the actual value of ~1)~shows an appreciable ing to eqn.

interlinked

after no further

decrease under radial load at the

A or I0 decreases

correspondingly

accord

the other hand, there is no slip of the ball at the loaded side, so that

the value of wo coincides

with the ideal one, giving maximum

within the period of the cage. Dividing

the measured

value of the amplitude

amplitude

by =I /sin x found in

Fig. 5 at the known speed S, the \ralue of sin x or 2 can be easily obtained.

MOTION

OF A BALL IN A BALL BEARING

183

RESULTS

Interpretation

o/ records

The oscillograms

shown in Fig. 6 are examples

The short period

T,,represents

not an absolute

motion

one revolution

of the ball but

of records taken under radial load.

of the ball relative

the relative

motion

to the cage. It is

to the cage that

the

Fig. 6. Explanation of oscillogram. (a) No. 6307, P = IOO kg, N = 1290 rev/min. (b) No. 7307 P : IOO kg, .V = 7jo rev/min. T: Period of revolution of inner ring or shaft; Tb: Period of rolling ball, Tbmax: Maximum of Tb; Te: Period of revolution of cage or ball centre; T,: Period of fluctuation of amplitude.

oscillogram

indicates,

because the motion of the ball fixed to the cage does not induce

any change in flux.

T, shows the period of a revolution of the cage. The ball centre travels around the inner ring at a period T,.As mentioned above, the fluctuation of the amplitude with the period T, is caused by the slip of the ball at the unloaded side of the bearing. An extremely unloaded period

The oscillogram

(b) is a record of the angular contact

large slip represented

by the prolonged

side owing to the absence

able. The amplitude angle LSbetween mentary

value.

(a) the fluctuation A,,

with the long period

and Amin correspond

the magnetic

axis of rolling is calculated

7-10

are the oscillograms

by using the calibration

in speed the slip decreases.

&lax

-

of the bearings

No. 6208. It is noted that considerable

and minimum

of the

curves in Fig. 5 :

(2)

ami,

No. 6307,

No. 7307,

No. 6306

and

slip occurs at low speed and that with increase

The regular fluctuation

several records. The condition

T,like a beat is remark-

to the maximum

and the rolling axes of the ball. The change of the mo-

Aoc = Figs.

bearing No. 7307.

Tbmaxis produced at the

of a thrust load. At the loaded side, however, the

Tb coincides to the theoretical

In the oscillogram

period

for its occurrence

of the angle OLis shown clearly in

will be discussed later.

184

I.. HllC\SO.

H. -t’.\5rOl‘H

MOTION

Fig.

8. Oscillograms

Fig.

9. Oscillograms

OF A BALL

IN A BALL

BEARING

185

of No. 7307 with solid cage, P = 100 kg, spindle oil IO cc/min. (a) 305, (b) 500. (c) 1000, (d) 4000, (e) 1600 (P = 0).

of cageless

bearing No. 7307. P = IOO kg, spindle (a) 500, (b) 1320, (c) 3000.

oil IO cc/mix

WU’,

4 (1961)

Rev/min:

Rev/min:

177-197

IS0

lb.

Using the symbols relation is obtained

Hlli.\hO,Il.

as shown in Fig. II and under EOMENCLATUKE,the following

for the ideal motion of the rolling elements

The values of cc)b*/wC*are listed in Table measured

on the oscillogram

mb fluctuates

1.\>(111~~

deviate

I. The actual angular

from the theoretical

with the period re. The angular

oC* in the present experiments. The mean value of (Ob/(,_)c =

velocity

velocities

OJ~and W-

values. As shown in Fig. 6. we, however,

coincides

with

In other words, there is no slip of the cage. cob/we

*

is easily obtained

waves included in a definite number of revolutions

by counting

the number

of

of the cage. Then the mean slip is

giLTen by the definition s :

(CW,* Wb)lW,*

, (wb*,lc!!lc*)((l/b:(‘J~)‘/(~~Ob*/f’)i*/

(4)

ir’?ctr, , (1001) L;/ 1’1;

RIOTIoN OF A BALL IN A BALL BEARING l‘he maximum

slip corresponding

is impossible, considered Fig.

however,

without

to

Wb

2n/Tb max is also significant.

=

an appreciable

error.

Hence

An estimate

only the mean slip is

in the following discussion.

12 shows the slip in the bearing

speed. At 5,000 increase

187

rev/min the motion

in radial load. The effect

small. However,

becomes

nearly

of viscosity

normal.

of the lubricant

with increase S decreases

in shaft also with

is found to be rather

the higher the oil-feed rate, the lower the slip (see Fig. 12(a)). In the

case of grease lubrication

0

No. 6307. It decreases

0

much lower slip is observed.

3000

1000

0

3000 Nkev/min)

ICUO

N (rev/mid

N(revlmin) b

a

C

Fig.

IL. Mean slip of No. 6307. (a) Effect of lubrication. P = IOO kg; spindle oil l , IO cc!min cc/min; cylinder oil A 9 cc/min, A 0.8 cc/min; x grease I cc. (b) Effect of load. Spindle oil IO cc/min. o, P = o kg; 0, IO kg; ., IOO kg: 0, 300 kg. (c) Effect of reduction of ball size,. Amount of reduction = 20 p. 0, P = IOO kg, normal size; 0, o kg, 4, 100 kg, all reduced six; A., o kg, A, IOOkg, ox reduced size. The bearing used in the experiment (h) was diffxezt from that in (a). 0,

I

Expressing

the position of the ball centre by the angle measured

of the load applied in the direction 90’,

gradually

develops

abruptly

disappears

raceways

increases

Consequently,

of the rotation

at the unloaded

at 320-330a4. at the unloaded

the contact

a maximum

clearance

Thus the radial clearance

side owing to the application

of radial

load.

loose. This causes

load the ball always keeps contact

is considered

the clearance,

slightly

balls of No. 6307. As a result, clearance

to have a marked smaller

increased

influence

with the

higher speed in the case of no load. Substituting magnetized

ball, between

neighbouring

the slip increases the magnetized

balls were of normal

its circumference

further.

to 60~ compared

imperfect

with the value of except

at

smaller ball only for the

It is reasonable

size. An experiment

for ordinary

considerably

the slightly

ball and the raceway

showed that

upon slip. In

balls were substituted

22 ,u for the ordinary balls. Fig. IZ (c) shows that slip increases

around

and

the ball and the

Here slip does not occur even at low speed (see Fig. 7 (j)).

order to change

clearance

at 29W300”

between

of the ball with the inner race becomes

slip of the ball. But under pure thrust raceways.

of the shaft, slip begins at nearly

side, attains

The actual

from the position

to consider

was increased

that

the

because

the

in which a ball was ground

sphericity

resulted

in a somewhat

ISS irregular

H.

b’. HlRANO.

rolling

motion.

There

l.\SOl!li

was no significant

difference

betne~n

the result5

using the solid cage and the pressed cage. The data Though

of the angular

the bearing

contact

bearing

of this type should

No. 7307

be properly

are summarized operated

in Fig.

under the action

1.3. of

N (rev/min)

Fig. 13, Mean slip of No. 7307. Spindle oil IO cc/min. 0, P L o kg, l , 100kg, solid cage ; A, o kg, A , 1oo kg, cag~lc~s.

thrust load, the experiment contact

between

deep-grooved

Fig. 14. Oscillograms of netized balls, P = LOOkg, (a) L magnetized balls in rcv/min. (b) S magnetized

No. 1,307 with magspindle oil, I cc/min. opposite holes, 3010 balls, 3050 rcv!mil1.

was carried out under pure radial load. Consequently

the balls and the raceways

became

type. This leads to the remarkable

much looser compared

increase

13 balls for IO in the ordinary

Fig. 13. The extraordinarily by adjacent

the cage and

type No. 7307. The result is also plotted in

high value of the slip is attributed

to the braking

action

balls.

The experimental

points of the bearing No. 6306 fall near the upper curve in Fig. IZ

(c). The slip in the bearing

bearings

with thr

of the slip even at higher

speed as shown in Fig. 8. The cageless bearing was prepared by removing substituting

the

were provided

after repeated

mounting

No. 6208 was at most 3qi0, except at very low speed. These

with the pressed steel cages. Since deformation and dismounting

data was inferior compared

was inevitable,

of the cages

the reproducibility

of the

with the case of the solid cage.

Change ilz rolling axis o/ ball The fluctuation maintain

of the amplitude

with the period ‘r, as shown in Figs. C-IO tends to

its wave form for a long time or after repeated

shaft speed. Further,

increase

it has been verified that the behaviour

same except for its phase. The resultant regular form shown in the oscillograms

and decrease of the

of each ball is exactly

current induced by the magnetized in Fig. 14.

the

balls has a

MOTION

Denoting

the frequency

189

OF A BALL IN A BALL BEARING

of the fluctuation

ratio CO~/CO~ is equal to the difference

by ns c/min or ws rad/sec = 24T,,

the

of wb/wCfrom the nearest integer m. The relation

can be written W&C = I(oe/wC) - ml or n&c = I(?+,) where %b =

2nw~/60

and vt, = 27~~()~/60.Because

6307 as in Table I, the value of m is 5 with a few exceptions In the case of No. 7307, however, 2,3

and 4 frequently

ml

(5)

where considerable

corresponding

slip is observed,

to m = 4.

several values

appear beside m = 5. This means that the period T, is determined

by the number of revolutions the ball becomes

-

e&*/e&* = 5.30 in the case of No.

until the accumulation

of the phase lag of the motion of

2~.

0 Fig.

1000

2000

3000 4000 N(rev/min)

15. Change of rolling axis plotted

5000

against

shaft speed.

10

2

3

4b

5, b/nTj

5

Fig. 16. Change of rolling axis plotted against nO/n,. (a) No. 6307. P = IOO kg. ., spindle oil IO cc/min; 0, cylinder oil 9 cc/min; o cylinder oil 0.8 cc/min; A spindle oil + o. I oh quartz powder; x grease I cc. (b) No. 7307. 0 0, P = IOO kg; o, o kg. (c) No. 6306, P = IOO kg. (d) NO. 6208, ., P = Iookg; o, okg.

As explained

above, the fluctuation

of the amplitude

angle between the rolling axis and the magnetic fizsis that of the fluctuation

of the instantaneous

represents

axis. Accordingly,

the change of the the frequency

rolling axis relative Wear,

os or

to the ball. For 4 (1961)

177-797

the sake of brwity Is, calculated

it will bc drsi~inated as /ls in the following description.

by means of the calibration

cur\cs show resonance

curve in Fig. 5, against

as in Fig. 15. The dependence

relation becomes different

of ,l x on speed is not unicl~i~~.‘I‘h(a

if the slip varies owing to the change of load orvtlicr

It is readily seen that thcx peaks of the curves in Fig. 15 correspond values of the ratio ,nb/wzc= w,;~oc. Hence, plotting 70’- mar the point MI :=

I?( = 2, 3. 4 and 5 are cltarfy pi-oportioli~tlit~

i.i’., .h . Sill interpreted

observed

j and

witi1

to the integral

in the cast of the So.

4. Four peaks corresponding

to

in the cast of So. 7307. 7’1~~cmves show ~10s~~

to icoscc ~~~,)~,~(I~~) :- cosec (TW~,~/~C)~). l’hc

(7f(tJ8jlrJc~]iimiw?s

f;~c‘tors

,/~ccagainst the ratio, the esperimen-

tal points fall on a unique cur\:e as shown in Fig. 16. Especially 0307 the change esceeds

l’lottinr:

the shaft speed, 111,.

dip

.i‘. In

the

pi-oportio~lalit~

constant,

following wction this I-t’I&$On \ViIlbi’

tlworttticall~~. I)ISCIISSIt)N

(‘mtsr

o,iclznngt~in

rolling uxis o,i hall

Since at the beginning to be constant

of the slip the position

under given operating

conditions,

surface of the ball, e.g. the displacement

the ball centre, bearing,

may be treated

the point CC) makes

revolution

of the magnetic

as follows.

If the ball behaves

CIJ~~/W C revolutions

about

of a point Co on the

pole after each revolution

of

as a roller in a roller

the x-axis

at the end of one

of the ball centre and comes to the point Co’. The shift of the phase angle is

then expressed

by p -- X((W,/W,.)

After successive revolutions /_C00x

d of the ball in Fig. 17 is considered the displacement

= J__CO’OX =:

MZ)~ or #q = znw,/w?

((j)

of the ball centre the point travels to Co”, CO”‘, . . Because

. =z 2 in this case, the fluctuation

of the amplitude

does not

occur. In order to explain

the fluctuation

from the path CO‘CO“CO”’

of the amplitude,

a deviation

of the point Cct

. should be assumed. Let the position of Cn after the deGa-

tion beC1’. It may be reasonable

to assume that the deviation

is caused by the angular

displacement E about the diameter AB (y-axis) passing the contact point A. At the unloaded side tht ball is set fret! from the contact with the inner race, though the contact with the outer race is still maintained here owing to the centrifugal fowl acting on the ball. Thus the effect of the cage! on the motion of the ball becomes signiIicant at the unloaded side. Actually, there is always more or ltzss dv\riation from tlw ideal contact condition. Especially, the contact point of the ball with tht: pock(~t holt~ of the cage or with the groove of thv outer race may have a slight offset from the plant. of syrnrnvtr!. of the groove. The offset cauws a spinning moment about then asis AI3. ‘I‘hii; suggests the origin of thv displacemrnt c. i. c.. t IH spin.

Fig. IS illustrate5 tile motion of the point C‘” as a result of the succcssiv~ displawment ,4 and F. Actnall!., the ball rolls with the thcorctical angular velocity c~J,,* at the loaded side and then slips at the unloaded siclc. Howlver, it is assumed for brc\. ity that the rolling velocity is c~lual to the constant myan angular \-ctlocit!, CII~nntl that the displacement F takes plaw instantaneously at the point A. Starting from the point CO, ij-displacement transfers it to C‘“‘, \vhich comvs to (‘I’ after F-displacement. \\‘hen the displacements arc repeated the point travels to (‘I’, (‘2”. (‘3”‘. , C‘,,(n).If the point Co is the magnetic pole, the angle /_,xOC,(n) is equal to the angle z for each revolution of the cage. The amplitude of the oscillogram is reprcscnt4 bv sin 1._AX‘,(“). The difference bctwccn ,zmax and Ymin shown in Fig-. IS is th(s c.hangc~ of the rolling axis rclati\~c to the co-ordinatc~ s\,stcrn fiwd to thv ball.

192

Theoreticul

camideration

analysis the position of the point on the batl is cxprt%sed b\- tlttz

In the following

unit vectors

cl”’ : Yn

,(n)

(x,,.

Gn) and C.,J., :

1’1,

, 1’,,-I

i.T,,..I.

,1’,,

I,

u^,,-1)

:7

where fl = ~,a, _ _ . The displacements /Iand R are represented by the transformations of the vectors from ~~-1to ~~~‘-1 and from ~~‘-1to r,, respectively. Those tr~~ilsformations are also written as the matricrs x =

I ‘: p .-; 0 COh ] 0 sin fl

;]

and Y :- [_$::

1

T]

(S)

- (YXP ]Z]

(9)

The relation between the vectors is then expressed 1~~ = Y*[z;]

Now, it is known that the resultant transformation T = YX is equivalent angular displacement y about the unit vector ~(a, p, Y)“. T is written as COSy + 12(r-ctts yrl T =

vsin

-V sin y + .Ajt(r-cos

y + puii(~~--cmT/I)

i -p sin y + vA( I

ws 7p)

7p)

to the

Q sin y $ Av(r--- cos y)

cos y + y"(r---cosy') ----a sin ?/,+ /LV(I cos y)

CI,S 1,’ +

7. sin y --C vh( I- cos y)

iJOI

L’( I-- (‘OS y1).1

where A = ~0s (42) v

-

-sin

sin (~/z)~s~n (ytk),

(e/2) sin (~~z)/sin (y/r)

cm (y/2)

I__ cm (F/L) cm (P/L)

.- sin (F/Z) cm

~~~2~~~~1~

(y$z)

md

(I rl

or sin (y/z)

--

1:1--4zos’ {p/2) cm2 (/3/L)

Since the repeated transformation (YX)n = Tnrepresents the angular displacement ny about the e-vector, it is derived from (IO) 1~~;substituting 1ny1for y: WV)

(12!

T(V)

Hence from (g), (IO) and (12)

= il (,4x0 + j4yf, + ~70) -t cos mp[xo --- A (Ax0 + jhuy,,T w-a) + sin q

(pa

vy0)

('3)

Denoting by LeOx and i_eOro the angle between r-vector and x-axis and that bctween e and ro-vector, respectively, eqn. (13) is written as x,, = ~0s (~~ec>x) ~0s (LPOQ) -I- sin (jot)

sin

(jr(h)

~0s 14

(14)

where CDS(LPor) 7 3.. cos (/ r0vo) = 3,s”+ /&Jo-‘- YZi.8 anit 21-= 8211’ --- sin -1 (.LG~ 1 ly~~)/sin (/ .20x) sin (/_eOro) are substituted.

(15)

MOTION OF A BALL IN A BALL BEARING

Since

LxOCn(n)

After rewriting

=

LxOr,

=

that

u takes discrete

u behaves

permitted,

LeOx) cos2 (u/z) + cos(LeOr0

values with increasing

as a continuous

variable.

xn is equal

to cos 0~.

and minimum

(k = integer).

+ LeOx) sin2 (U/Z)

12. However,

This assumption

except in the case where y/n is expressed

the maximum tively

mentioned,

(14))

cos OL= cos (LeOro -

The variable

CL, as previously

193

of LXare attained

(16)

it is assumed

of simplification

here

may be

by a ratio of simple integers. Then

at u = (zk + I) 7c and u = okn, respec-

Thus mrnax= LeOro + LeOx and ~(,,,i,, = 1LeOro -

LeOxl

(17)

Hence -‘ahin)/ LeOx = (L%lIax

or LeOx

The expressions

AB, where A and B are the projections

axis. The angular co-ordinate

(16). The ordinate

graphically

LeOx)

(18)

LeOx)

(18)’

in Fig. 19. Take two

max and amin on the unit circle. Then describe to OL

Fig. 19. Diagrammatic

of the circle AB is the variable

representation

of fluctuation

the

of A’ and B’ on the u in (14) or

of amplitude.

of the point on the circle A ‘B’ is found to be sin L-X from (14) and (17).

Since the amplitude

of the oscillogram

sented by the figure obtained Special

(for LeOvo <

(16), (17) and (18) are represented

circle with the diameter

abscissa

(for //eOro >

da/a

= (amax + bin)/

points A’ and B’ corresponding horizontal

=

is proportional

by plotting

to sin LX,the wave form is repre-

the ordinate

of the circle A’B’ against

the

u. attention

must be paid to the expression

amin may be taken in the negative

(IS’), which shows that the angle

sense, as shown in Fig. 19 by B”. Even if the change Wear, 4 (1961) 177-197

L

in is the same

fluctuation

as in the normal

of the amplitude

Fig. 19(b), the amplitude is an example treated

HIH.XISO,H.

I’.

19-i

difference

the circle .I “H”

correspondin@y.

observed

(II)

smaller.

the period1‘,. The oscillogram

record?;.

These

‘11~.

CJO“as in l:ig. ~(ki

two cases must be tlistincti\~c~l~~ however, is rather rare and tllta

case is readily apparent.

cos(~.&)x)

= ?., eqn. (18) can be written sin (LIr+./2)--

Substituting

becomt5

When *xrnnxescerds

of the data. Their occurrence,

from the ordinary

Now, considering

case (IS),

decreases

has two maximawithin

of actually

in the analysis

T.\XOl‘K

as

1 I---L”

for ii, we obtain sin (.iln/r)

= sin (r/l)/sin

(y/zj

(IQ1

The period of the change of a is represented

by ny =

according to eqn. (13). On the

other hand, the period T, in Fig. 6 contains

n revolutions

2x

of the cage, i.e., T, = ~27;.

Hence ?/I~7rn/lz Then the relation

rrzTe/Ta

-=

mw&u<

(19) becomes sin (.&z/2) -7 sin (c/r)/sin (nw,/wp) = sin (r/r)/fsin (nwb/toc); The expression

where (5) or (6) is substituted.

shown in Fig. 16. A more detailed discussion

(20)

verifies

the experimental

(20) results

of the quantitati~~e relation between the

spin E and the slip S will be developed in the next section. Relation

between sli$ artd chaagt: i?z rolling CL&

As mentioned assuming

above, the change in the rolling axis of the ball is clearly explained

the existence

of spin associated

2Or

20

(~2)

15 ~

E

.

5

s r‘

0.

0

10 slip

25

1 (b)

E

l*

10

by

with slip. In order to find the factors affect-

P,ZO

0

10

20

30

s

k)

40 50 60 Slip S PM

.

20 E

.

15

10 :

5

5

l*

l

LL 0

10

20

30 40 SP?%)

c (d)

l *

IO

l2kffKc

0

1

2

3

SW*)

Fig. 20. Relation between slip and spin. (a) So. 6307. P - IOO kg. (b) No. 7307. 0, P == ukg, 0, IOO kg, solid cage; A, o kg, A, IOOkg, cageless. (c) No. 11306. P = ran kg, (d) So. 6~08. 0. 3’~~ o kg; 0. TOOkg.

MOTION

ing spin,

it must

OF A BALL

be calculated

(or ws/oe) and AX into relation S it is finally confirmed The proportionality and on the operating metric contact

first

constant,

however,

conditions.

Since

hole in the direction the assembled

is specified

to S, as in Fig.

0.15

cage into the bearing

originates

20.

in the asym-

of the bearing.

this effect.

One of

The amount

of the

mm in the moderate

The position

case. The results

of the hole in which the magnet-

by the angle measured

of the revolution

of WC/CU~

the mean slip

hole of the cage or with the groove of the

was carried out, exaggerating

21.

data

against

is found to depend on the type of bearing

case and

in the former case are shown in Fig.

the observed

the spin probably

holes was offset in the axial direction

offset was 0.3 mm in the extreme

195

the results

that the spin E is proportional

of the ball with the pocket

ized ball was inserted

BEARIKG

by substituting

(20). On plotting

outer ring, the following experiment the pocket

IN A BALL

from the centre of the offset

of the cage. The axial deviation was shown also in Fig.

21.

of the holes in

The holes o” (offset

N (rev/mid

Fig.

21. Slip Of balls in cage with offs.3 hole. P =

hole), 45” and 180’ occupied 270’ the internal

position.

the external

position

The cage was supported

x/min. IOO kg, spindle oil 10 G

and the holes 9o”, 135”,225’ and by the balls in three external

The four internal

balls were supposed

This is confirmed

by the fact that the slip occurs at the internal

Fig.

21,

and that at the external

to be free from contact

holes negative

holes.

with the inner race. holes, as shown in

values are obtained.

The negative

slip

Wear, 4 (1961) 177-197

1:. HIRANO,

196 represents

the overrun

H. TANOUE

of tfre ball owing to the offset of the ball centre.

In the inter-

mediate case of the hole 315”, the ball shows small positive slip at lower speed. Further,

it was found that the spin E calculated

holes 90” and

225’

one may conclude

22

the greater is the spin of the bail. The result of the smaller offset,

mm, also supports

looser except

this conclusion.

at the offset hole. Negative

it is shown that an appreciable

Fig.

spin associated operation negative rings,

of the bearing,

Here,

slip is considered

unfavourable

effect

under thrust

and combined

slip. The

hole.

to have no harmful

contact

influence

upon the

side. On the contrary,

the

of the ball with the grooves of the

of the spin becomes

load were disregarded.

effect of slip and spin, however,

out under thrust

with the negative

because it occurs at the unloaded the harmful

of the balls was much

only at the offset hole. In Fig.

spin is also associated

slip is caused by the asymmetric the experiments

the contact

slip occurred

~2. Spin of balls in cage with offset

with positive

and consequently

research

Consequentl!..

22.

that the larger the offset of the ball centre from the plane of sym-

metry of the bearing, 0.15

by using eqn. (20) is larger at the,

than at the holes 135” and 270°, as shown in Fig.

further

inevitable.

In this

In order to find the

investigation

should be carried

loads. CONCLUSIONS

By using a magnetized ball bearing

ball it was possible to follow the behaviour

under radial load. The motion

sional and associated

of the ball in a

of the ball was found to be three-dimen-

with slip and spin. The conclusions

are as follows:

I. Slip of the ball occurs at the unloaded side, where its contact

with the raceways is

looser. Slip decreases with increase in speed and load. It increases with radial clearance. 2.

The instantaneous

rolling axis relative

to the ball changes regularly.

Its change

is closely related to the slip. 3. The cause of the change placement

in the rolling axis is spin during slip. The angular

of the spin is proportional

4. The spin increases

dis-

to the mean slip.

with the asymmetry

of the contact

of the ball with the cage

or with the grooves of the races. 5. Further

increase in asymmetry

slip is observed;

causes negative

in this case the contact

is considered

slip. Under pure thrust to be still maintained.

load no

197

MOTIONOFABALLINABALLBEARING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the members of Research Laboratory, Nippon Seiko Co., Fujisawa, Japan, especially Dr. T. HATTORI and Mr. S. YAMAMOTO for their kind support.

FEFERENCES 1 W. HAMPP, Igr.-Arch., 12 (1941) 6. 2 T. SASAKI et al., Trans. Japan. Sot. Mech. Engrs., 8 (1942) 1-64 (in Japanese). 3 F. HIRANO AND H. YOSHINARI, Machine Science, 2 (1950) 31 (in Japanese). 4 K. IIDA AND T. IGARASHI, J. Japan. Sot. Mech. Engrs., 62 (1959) 369 (in Japanese). 5 E. T. WHITTAKER, A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics, 4th ed., Cambridge University 1937.

Press,

Wea+‘, 4 (1961) 177-197