Accepted Manuscript PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic Ondrej Audy, Lisa Melymuk, Marta Venier, Simon Vojta, Jitka Becanova, Kevin Romanak, Martina Vykoukalova, Roman Prokes, Petr Kukucka, Miriam L. Diamond, Jana Klanova PII:
S0045-6535(18)30858-0
DOI:
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.016
Reference:
CHEM 21344
To appear in:
ECSN
Received Date: 3 January 2018 Revised Date:
1 May 2018
Accepted Date: 2 May 2018
Please cite this article as: Audy, O., Melymuk, L., Venier, M., Vojta, S., Becanova, J., Romanak, K., Vykoukalova, M., Prokes, R., Kukucka, P., Diamond, M.L., Klanova, J., PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic, Chemosphere (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2 3
PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - a comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic
4 5
Ondrej Audy,1 Lisa Melymuk,1,* Marta Venier,2 Simon Vojta,1,+ Jitka Becanova,1,+ Kevin Romanak,2 Martina Vykoukalova, 1 Roman Prokes,1 Petr Kukucka,1 Miriam L. Diamond,3 Jana Klanova1
7
1
8 9
2
10
3
RI PT
6 RECETOX, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, pavilion A29, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 702 Walnut Grove Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405 United States
SC
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto, Canada M5S 3B1
11 * Corresponding author: Lisa Melymuk
13
Email:
[email protected]
14
Phone: +420 549 493 995
15 16
Address: RECETOX, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, pavilion A29, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
17 +
Present address of S. Vojta and J. Becanova: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882-1197, USA
20
Keywords: polychlorinated biphenyls; organochlorine pesticides; DDT; HCB; HCH; country differences
EP
21 22
TE D
18 19
M AN U
12
AC C
23
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT
25
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) are restricted compounds
26
that are ubiquitously detected in the environment, including in indoor matrices such as air and
27
residential dust. We report concentrations of PCBs and selected OCPs in indoor air and dust from
28
homes in Canada (23 homes) and Czech Republic (20 homes). Indoor air concentrations of PCBs and
29
OCPs were ~10 times higher than that outdoors. PCB concentrations of ~450 ng/m3 were similar in
30
both countries, higher in homes built before the restrictions on PCBs, and had congener profiles
31
consistent with PCB mixtures manufactured or used in each country. All OCP air concentrations were
32
higher in the Czech Republic than in the Canadian samples, suggesting greater indoor use of, for
33
example, DDT and HCH. These data emphasize the persistence of these organochlorine compounds
34
indoors and their presence in homes even after new usage was prohibited. Indoor levels of these
35
legacy POPs remain at similar levels to compounds of current concern, such as brominated flame
36
retardants and perfluorinated alkyl substances, emphasizing that they deserve ongoing attention in
37
view of knowledge of OCP toxicity.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
24
AC C
EP
TE D
38
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
INTRODUCTION
40
In 1995, the United Nations Environment Program requested that international controls be placed on
41
12 persistent organic pollutants or POPs (the “Dirty Dozen”), including polychlorinated biphenyls
42
(PCBs) and nine organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). The impetus came from decades of research that
43
documented their persistence and ability to cause harm to human health and the environment. These
44
concerns led to the Stockholm Convention, which entered into force in 2004 with 152 countries as
45
signatories (Stockholm Convention, 2008). The Convention called on the parties to “prohibit and/or
46
eliminate the production and use, as well as the import and export” of the 12 POPs. For PCBs, this
47
came some 30 years after regulations were passed in several countries to control production and new
48
uses (Diamond et al., 2010). Still, today measurements continue to document human and
49
environmental exposure to, and harm from, many of the “Dirty Dozen” (Diamond, 2017; Lyall et al.,
50
2016; Rosenbaum et al., 2017).
51
The indoor environment is an important pathway for human exposure to semi-volatile organic
52
compounds (SVOCs), including the “Dirty Dozen”, via air and dust inhalation and dust ingestion
53
(Booij et al., 2016; Dirtu et al., 2012; Harrad et al., 2006; Marek et al., 2017). PCBs and OCPs have
54
been found in indoor air and dust due to past uses (i.e., primary sources; Booij et al., 2016;
55
Frederiksen et al., 2012; Rudel et al., 2008), the subsequent contamination of and release from indoor
56
materials (i.e., secondary sources; Marek et al., 2017), from current poorly-quantified sources such as
57
impurities in other chemicals (Vorkamp, 2016), and emissions from new building materials and
58
consumer products (Herkert et al., 2018; Hu and Hornbuckle, 2010). Levels of PCBs and often OCPs
59
in indoor air are higher than in outdoor air (Harrad et al., 2006; Melymuk et al., 2016a; Rudel et al.,
60
2010), and there is no recent evidence of declines in the indoor levels (Harrad et al., 2006). This
61
points to POPs used or released indoors being more persistent than outdoors as fewer opportunities
62
exist for losses through air flow and photolytic reactions (Bennett et al., 2014; Shin et al., 2013).
63
Potential risks arise from exposure to POPs through indoor pathways as people in developed countries
64
spend >90% of their time indoors (Klepeis et al., 2001; Matz et al., 2014), and inhalation exposure
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
39
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from indoor environments can contribute up to one-third of total exposure for lower-chlorinated PCB
66
congeners (Ampleman et al., 2015).
67
PCBs were high production volume chemicals used worldwide from the 1940s to 1980s, with global
68
production of ~1.4 million tonnes. 650 000 tonnes were produced in USA from 1930 to 1977 by
69
Monsanto as Aroclor mixtures, and 21 000 tonnes in Slovakia (former Czechoslovakia) from 1959-
70
1984 by Chemko Stražské as Delor mixtures (Breivik et al. 2002). PCBs used in Canada were
71
imported Aroclors from USA. PCBs were used as coolants, insulating fluids in transformers and
72
capacitors, stabilizing additives in PVC, and as plasticizers in paint and building sealants, as well as in
73
numerous other applications (WHO/IPCS, 1993). Ongoing primary use continues in older building
74
materials and electrical equipment in countries that are not signatories to the Stockholm Convention
75
and thus have not regulated their removal and destruction, notably USA (US EPA, 2017). Even for
76
signatories of the Convention, regulations may specify only partial removal and destruction. For
77
example, Canada mandated removal by 2009 of equipment containing PCBs <500 mg/kg or >50 to
78
<500 mg PCB/kg if it is located in a sensitive location such as a child care facility or drinking water
79
treatment plant and removal of most uses (e.g., PCBs in light ballasts, pole-top electrical
80
transformers) by 2025 (Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 2015). The Czech Republic required
81
removal of materials with >500 mg/kg PCB content by 2010 (National Centre for Toxic Compounds,
82
2017). These regulations may not cover all PCB-containing materials, such as building sealants, for
83
which concentrations can be less than these “action” levels (Diamond et al., 2010; Robson et al.,
84
2010) or exemptions (e.g., in colouring pigments, electrical capacitors that are “an integral part of a
85
consumer product”) (Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 2015). Nonetheless, these PCB-
86
containing materials may be a concern in many indoor environments as they can lead to elevated
87
indoor levels of PCBs and thus higher exposure (Frederiksen et al., 2012; Herrick et al., 2016; Marek
88
et al., 2017).
89
DDT was used as a potent insecticide in both indoor and outdoor applications. Although new uses
90
were prohibited when it was added to the Stockholm Convention in 2004, three countries currently
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
65
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT produce DDT and it is used in about 15 countries, primarily to control mosquito vectors of malaria
92
(Stockholm Convention, 2009; van den Berg, 2009). DDT use was permitted in Canada until the mid-
93
1970s, but a total ban on all uses only took place in 1985 “with the understanding that existing stocks
94
would be sold, used or disposed of by December 31, 1990” (Environment Canada, 2013a). DDT was
95
registered for use from 1951 to 1973 in Czechoslovakia; remaining unused stocks were destroyed in
96
the 1990s (Holoubek et al., 2006; Turusov et al., 2002). Past indoor uses included direct pest control
97
in homes and agricultural buildings, and in combination with PCBs, as a wood preservative (Abb et
98
al., 2010). DDT undergoes degradation to DDD and subsequently to the more stable DDE.
99
HCH was first produced as “technical HCH” which contained about 14% γ-HCH, the only conformer
SC
RI PT
91
with insecticidal properties, 65–70% α-HCH, 7–10% β-HCH, and about 7% δ-HCH (Willett et al.,
101
1998). The use of technical HCH was banned in Canada in 1971. Technical HCH was replaced on the
102
market by purified (90%) γ-HCH, also called lindane. The major use of γ-HCH was to treat crops,
103
seeds, soils and livestock, with additional uses as a pharmaceutical. Combined with DDT, it was also
104
used to treat wood, including various art objects (Holt et al., 2017; Marcotte et al., 2014; Schieweck et
105
al., 2007). Agricultural use of γ-HCH is restricted in the Czech Republic (since 1977; Holoubek et al.,
106
2006) and Canada (since 2004; Health Canada, 2009), and the Czech Republic and Canada stopped
107
the sale of all HCH-containing pharmaceuticals in 2008 (Scott and Chosidow, 2011) and 2011
108
(Environment Canada, 2013b), respectively.
109
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) was a fungicide produced to treat seeds and preserve wood (WHO/IPCS,
110
1997). Pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) is an impurity originating during the synthesis of several
111
chlorinated pesticides, including HCB (Environment Canada, 2005). A major current source of both
112
PeCB and HCB is incomplete combustion of organic material, e.g. solid waste and biomass burning
113
(Bailey et al., 2009; Environment Canada, 2005; Nielsen et al., 2013). HCB was used primarily as a
114
soil treatment in Czech Republic, with production ceasing in 1968 and use in 1977 (Holoubek et al.,
115
2006). Canada first regulated HCB in 2003 and then strengthened these regulations in 2012
116
(Environment Canada, 2017).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
100
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT PCBs and OCPs continue to be detected in indoor air (Blanchard et al., 2014; Bohlin et al., 2008;
118
Harrad et al., 2006; Laborie et al., 2016; Tue et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2011) and
119
in dust from homes, offices, and public buildings (Ali et al., 2012; Bräuner et al., 2011; Dirtu et al.,
120
2012; Harrad et al., 2009; Tan et al., 2007). Although the major uses of PCBs and OCPs were in
121
agriculture or in closed industrial applications, indoor concentrations are frequently found to be higher
122
than outdoor levels, confirming their indoor persistence and the importance of indoor
123
microenvironments in the total exposure to these chemicals decades after restrictions on use
124
(Melymuk et al., 2016a; Vorhees et al., 1997; Wilson et al., 2011).
125
In this study we report levels of PCBs and OCPs in indoor air and dust from homes in Czech Republic
126
and Canada. We compare concentrations in the context of past production, usage and regulation, and
127
evaluate the relative significance of legacy indoor pollutants relative to newer compounds, such as
128
flame retardants. We also interpret the data in terms of effectiveness of regulatory controls since
129
PCBs and OCPs were among the first chemicals to come under control through the Stockholm
130
Convention.
131
MATERIALS AND METHODS
132
Sampling
133
Samples were taken from 43 houses and apartments from two locations: 23 homes in Toronto, Canada
134
(CAN) and 20 homes in Brno, Czech Republic (CZ) (Table S1) in June-August 2013. These locations
135
were not influenced by local industrial emissions and were representative of domestic chemical use
136
patterns. At least one room was sampled in each home and a second room was sampled in ~10 houses
137
from each country, resulting in 35 samples from CAN and 30 from CZ. Participation was voluntary
138
with written consent given and no compensation. Air samples were collected by 28-day deployments
139
of polyurethane foam passive air samplers (PUF-PAS, Figure S1) and floor dust samples were
140
collected with a household vacuum cleaner. All details regarding study locations, sampling and
141
analysis are described by Venier et al. (2016) and are summarized briefly herein.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
117
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT All sampling materials were pre-cleaned before sampling by Soxhlet extraction (8 h in acetone, then 8
143
h in toluene). On day one, PUF-PAS were deployed in either single bowl (CAN) or double bowl (CZ)
144
configurations. After 28 days, PUF-PAS were collected, along with floor dust. Floor dust was
145
collected using a polyester sock inserted into the hose of a household vacuum cleaner, and the largest
146
possible accessible area in each room was sampled. All sampled media were wrapped in clean
147
aluminum foil, sealed, labeled and subsequently stored at -20°C until analysis.
148
Sample analysis
149
In this paper we focus on seven indicator PCB congeners (∑7PCB is the sum of PCB 28, 52, 101, 118,
150
138, 153, and 180), p,p’-DDT and related compounds (DDX is the sum of o,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDD, o,p’-
151
DDD, p,p’-DDE, and o,p’-DDE), HCB, PeCB and HCH isomers (HCHs defined as the sum of α-, ß-,
152
and γ-HCH) (Table S2).
153
Extraction and fractionation of samples is described in detail in Venier et al. (2016). Before
154
extraction, all samples were spiked with known amounts of recovery standards (PCB 30 and 185
155
(Absolute Standards, Hamden, CT, USA) for CAN and CZ samples. Socks with dust were weighed,
156
the dust was sieved to <500 µm, approximately 100 mg were separated for analysis, and the excess
157
dust was archived. The sock was rinsed with 30 mL hexane in acetone (1:1 v:v), and the solvent was
158
combined with weighed dust. Dust was sonicated in 30 mL of 1:1 acetone:hexane (v:v); left to settle
159
for 30 minutes, and the supernatant was decanted. The procedure was repeated 2 additional times with
160
10 mL of fresh solvent, and the extracts were combined. PUFs were extracted with 150 mL of
161
dichloromethane (DCM) using automated warm Soxhlet extraction (Büchi B-811, Switzerland), the
162
volume of the combined extracts was reduced under a N2 stream and split 70:30 by weight. The 70%
163
aliquot was treated by sulfuric acid-modified silica and this extract was used for analysis of PCBs and
164
OCPs. The remaining 30% of the extract was used for other analyses (Venier et al., 2016;
165
Vykoukalová et al., 2017).
166
Final extracts were analyzed for PCBs and OCPs by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
167
(GC-MS/MS) using an Agilent 7890B GC coupled with an Agilent 7000B QQQ MS-MS. Three µL 7
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
142
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT was injected in pulsed splitless mode. Compounds were separated on a 60 m x 250 µm x 0.25 µm
169
HT8 capillary column (SGE, Australia) and analysed in electron impact (EI) mode. For each
170
compound two selected multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions (quantitative and qualifier
171
ion) and their respective ratios were monitored to ensure correct compound identification and
172
quantification. Samples were quantified using an internal standard added prior to instrumental
173
analysis (PCB-121, Absolute Standards, Hamden, CT, USA). Further GC-MS/MS parameters are
174
given in Tables S3 and S4.
175
Masses collected by passive air samplers were converted to concentrations based on the sampling
176
rates determined in a dedicated calibration study (details in SI). Sampling rates of 1.1 m3/day were
177
used for the single-bowl sampler (CAN) and 0.63 m3/day were used for the double bowl sampler
178
(CZ). These rates are comparable to indoor sampling rates previously determined for PUF-PAS
179
samplers (Bohlin et al., 2014; Hazrati and Harrad, 2007; Saini et al., 2015).
180
Samples from 20 homes from Bloomington, Indiana, USA (as described by Venier et al. 2016) were
181
also quantified for PCBs and OCPs in the same laboratory as the CAN and CZ samples. However,
182
these extracts were shipped to CZ for analysis and they suffered significant losses during transport.
183
Therefore, these results are considered only qualitative, and are described in the SI for the purpose of
184
comparison with the CAN and CZ indoor levels.
185
QA/QC
186
Sample recoveries were monitored for individual samples and averaged 80±10% for PCB 30 in air,
187
96±8% for PCB 185 in air, 87±11% for PCB 30 in dust, and 99±19% for PCB 185 in dust. Masses for
188
each compound were individually adjusted based on the recovery of the closest surrogate eluting in
189
the same fraction in an individual sample. Further information on recovery correction is given in the
190
SI.
191
Solvent blanks were used to check for laboratory contamination. Three field blanks for each matrix
192
per country were collected. Field blank averages and standard deviations are given in Tables S5-S8.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
168
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Masses of target compounds in each sample were then compared to average masses in field blanks
194
and treated as follows: if the blank average was <10 % of the amount in sample, no correction was
195
used. If the blank average was 10-35 % of the amount in sample, the blank level was subtracted. If the
196
blank average was >35 % of the amount in sample, the sample value was reported as below the limit
197
of detection (LOD).
198
For statistical analysis, all values below the limit of detection (LOD) were substituted with
199
(√2/2)*MDL (method detection limit). For the compounds present in field blanks, MDL was
200
calculated as average level in field blanks plus three times the standard deviation. For compounds not
201
found in field blanks, the instrumental detection limit was used, calculated as the amount giving a
202
signal with signal to noise ratio equal to 3 (Table S9).
203
Since concentrations were log-normally distributed they were log-transformed for all statistical
204
analyses. Statistical analyses and graphing was done using STATISTICA version 13 and Microsoft
205
Excel 2010 software.
206
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
M AN U
TE D
207
Table 1: Summary statistics for PCBs and OCPs in air and dust by country. n is the number of samples >LOD. SE indicates standard error of the mean. The ANOVA column identifies concentrations that were significantly different from one another at p<0.05 based on ANOVA results for comparison between countries calculated on logtransformed data. Data denoted by “a” were significantly higher than data denoted by “b”. Data for individual compounds are given in Tables S10-11.
EP
208 209 210 211 212
SC
RI PT
193
Dust (ng/g)
213 9
AC C
Air (pg/m3)
Canada
Σ7PCBs PeCB HCB HCHs DDX Σ7PCBs PeCB HCB HCHs DDX
Mean±SE Median
Range
734±162 455 222±56.3 113 376±23.7 363 514±105 274 329±79.3 99.6 69.1±39.4
109 - 5110 37.8 - 1800 160 - 767 64.1 - 2180 41.4 - 1550
Czech Republic n ANOVA Mean±SE Median 34 34 34 34 34 16 0 0 25 20
a a b b b b b a
Range
661±146 467 139 - 4230 103±11.3 87.1 52 - 314 768±61.3 711 294 - 1530 1500±359 746 206 - 7820 763±222 363 48 - 5650 79.3±20.8 75.1 11.4 - 358 1.2
n ANOVA 28 28 28 28 28 28 1 0 22 30
a b a a a a a a
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
214 215 216 217
Figure 1 Boxplots of ∑7PCBs, HCHs, and DDX in air and dust in each country. The horizontal line shows the median, boxes are 25% and 75% percentiles, and whiskers are minimum and maximum without outliers. The same letters (ab) indicate no significant difference in ANOVA, using Tukey post-hoc test (p<0.05).
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 218 219
PCBs
220
respectively (Table 1). Concentrations of ∑7PCBs in CAN and CZ samples were significantly
221
(p=0.0252) lower than those in USA samples from the same study (Table S14). After correcting for
222
the number of congeners reported, levels found in this study were comparable with those reported in
223
other European (Bohlin et al., 2008; Harrad et al., 2006) and Canadian (Zhang et al., 2011) homes
224
(medians 160 – 1800 pg/m3), and higher than those found in Mexico (Bohlin et al., 2008) and
225
Vietnam (Tue et al., 2013) (medians 46 and 57 pg/m3) (see Table S15). However, these concentrations
226
were significantly lower than those in buildings with PCB-containing sealants (Frederiksen et al.,
227
2012; Herrick et al., 2016; Marek et al., 2017). It is likely that indoor levels reported here came from
228
building materials such as caulking, cable insulation, capacitors, paints and varnishes, light ballasts
229
and/or other primary uses (ATSDR, 2000), or from contaminated outdoor areas. Moreover, the
230
similarity to reported concentrations measured over the past 15 years suggests that indoor levels of
231
PCBs have remained relatively consistent over this time period, with the differences controlled by
232
such sources (e.g., building sealants) rather than temporal changes caused by fate processes (e.g.,
233
ventilation, degradation reactions).
234
The indoor air concentrations of ∑7PCBs in CZ (median of 467 pg/m3, range 139-4230) were 3-10
235
times higher than outdoor air concentrations measured by the MONET passive sampling network,
236
which recorded median concentrations of 29-175 pg/m3 for sites in the same region (Table S17,
237
Borůvková et al., 2015). Similarly, indoor air concentrations of ∑7PCBs in CAN (median 455 pg/m3,
238
range 109-5110 pg/m3) were 10 times higher than ∑7PCBs in outdoor air concentrations measured in
239
the same region by the GAPS passive sampling network (Table S18, Borůvková et al., 2015). The
240
higher indoor concentrations indicate a significant contribution of indoor sources of PCBs, rather than
241
outdoor to indoor transport from external primary and secondary sources.
242
PCB congener patterns differed between countries. Lower chlorinated congeners (PCB 28 and 52)
243
generally dominated the air samples, consistent with their higher vapour pressures. However, while
244
CAN samples contained on average 80% of PCB 28 and 52, CZ samples contained a higher fraction 11
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
PCBs were detected in all air samples, with ∑7PCB medians of 455 and 467 pg/m3 in CAN and CZ,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (~50%) of penta- to hepta- congeners, mainly PCB 101 and 153 (Figure 2). These congener profiles
246
were consistent with what has previously been observed in homes in CAN (Harrad et al., 2009) and
247
CZ (Melymuk et al., 2016a).
248
The differences in congener profiles between CAN and CZ may be related to the PCB technical
249
mixtures that were in use in the two countries. PCBs used in North America were generally Aroclor
250
mixtures produced by Monsanto Corporation (Frame et al., 1996), while those used in Czech Republic
251
were Delor technical mixtures manufactured by Chemko Stražské in eastern Slovakia (Taniyasu et al.,
252
2003). North American building sealants are believed to have contained highly chlorinated Aroclors,
253
in particular 1248, 1254 and 1260 (Erickson and Kaley, 2011; Kohler et al., 2005; Robson et al.,
254
2010), which are dominated by penta-, hexa- and hepta- congeners (Frame et al., 1996), while other
255
PCB-containing building materials and products were predominantly formed from the lighter PCB
256
technical mixtures (e.g., Aroclors 1016, 1221-1254; Erickson and Kaley, 2011). In CZ, Delor
257
mixtures spanned similar ranges of chlorination to the Aroclor mixtures, but the mixture used for
258
paints, varnishes and adhesives, Delor 106, was dominated by the hexa- and hepta- congeners
259
(Holoubek et al., 2006; Taniyasu et al., 2003). The composition of indoor air in Czech homes has
260
been found to be similar to this technical mixture (Melymuk et al., 2016a). We hypothesize that the
261
difference in the PCB congener composition between CAN and CZ indoor air is related to differences
262
(i.e., lighter congeners in CAN than CZ) in the PCB technical mixtures used in indoor applications
263
(paints, sealants, adhesives, varnishes), and differences according to PCB manufacturer.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
245
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 100% PCB 180
80%
PCB 153 60%
PCB 138 PCB 118
RI PT
40% PCB 101 PCB 52
20% 0% CAN
CZ
264
SC
PCB 28
Figure 2: Average composition of PCB congeners in air samples
266
In dust, PCBs were found in 45% of CAN samples (median
267
median of 75.1 ng/g (Table 1). Levels were similar to those reported in homes from Romania, UK,
268
USA and Canada (Dirtu et al., 2012; Harrad et al., 2009) and higher than those found in rural homes
269
in Pakistan (Ali et al., 2012) (see Table S16). Because low molecular weight PCBs were generally
270
below detection in dust, it was not possible to evaluate the differences in congener profiles in dust.
271
The difference between levels in dust are consistent with the different PCB mixtures used between
272
CAN and CZ, as noted above.
273
Since new uses of PCBs in Canada and Czech Republic were prohibited in 1977 and 1984,
274
respectively, we hypothesized that indoor PCB concentrations are related to building age. This
275
relationship has previously been observed in Czech homes (Melymuk et al. 2016) and North
276
American residences (Colt et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2011). In our study, roughly half of CAN
277
sampled homes were built after the country-specific PCB regulations on new uses and therefore
278
should not contain any PCB-containing materials. In case of CZ, only 4 of the 20 homes were built
279
after the 1984 PCB regulations. As expected, Σ7PCB air and dust concentrations were lower in post-
280
than in pre-PCB regulation homes (Figure 3), with the difference for air being significant (Mann-
281
Whitney U Test, p=0.006 for CAN, p=0.020 for CZ). The qualitative measurements in USA homes
282
also show this relationship, with an even greater difference between pre-1977 and post-1977 home
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
265
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT indoor air concentrations (p<0.001 for USA homes). The lack of significance between dust
284
concentrations may have been due to the more heterogeneous nature of the dust matrix and more
285
limited detection due to differences in the PCB mixtures used. Differences according to building age
286
suggest, as with the congener profiles, that building materials are a major contributor to the indoor
287
levels, and that these primary sources (paints, caulking, wiring, etc.) remain in place leading to long-
288
term residential contamination by PCBs. It is also interesting to note the presence of PCBs in
289
buildings constructed after regulations were passed and hence when no PCB-containing materials
290
should have been used, indicating the ubiquity of these persistent compounds.
SC
RI PT
283
M AN U
7 6 5
2 1 0
AC C
-1
5 4
2 1 0 -1
-2
-2
-3
-3
Air
292 293 294 295 296
6
3
TE D
3
EP
ln c(Σ7PCB) [pg/m3]
4
7
ln c(Σ7PCB) [ng/g]
291
CAN pre-ban CAN post-ban CZ pre-ban CZ post-ban
Dust Matrix
Figure 3 Boxplots of Σ7PCB in air and dust in homes built pre- and post PCB bans on new (but not existing) uses. The horizontal line shows the median, boxes show 25% and 75% percentiles, whiskers are maximum and minimum without outliers. The relevant years for determining whether a house was built post-ban were 1977 (CAN) and 1984 (CZ).
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 297 298
DDT
299
medians of 99.6 pg/m3 in CAN, while in CZ they were higher than Σ7PCB, with a median of 363
300
pg/m3. Concentrations of both DDX and individual compounds were significantly higher in CZ than
301
in CAN (p=0.0144) (Table 1, Figure 1), with the exception of p,p’-DDT (see Table S10). Few studies
302
have reported indoor air concentrations of DDX compounds; the concentrations of DDX compounds
303
in CAN were close to those found in homes from the UK, while those in CZ were comparable to the
304
levels reported in Sweden and USA from 1996-1998, nearly 15-20 years earlier than our sampling
305
campaign (Bohlin et al., 2008; Leone et al., 2000; see Table S15). p,p’-DDE was the dominant
306
congener and the p,p’-DDE/p,p’-DDT ratio was >3 in most samples, indicative of old DDT
307
contamination (e.g. Bohlin et al., 2008). The ratio of o,p’-DDT/(o,p’-DDT+p,p’-DDT) was generally
308
0.5-0.6 (Table S10), which may suggest a contribution of dicofol as a source of DDT, as o,p’-DDT
309
exists as an impurity in dicofol (Venier and Hites, 2014).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
DDX air concentrations in North American homes were generally lower than Σ7PCB, with DDX
ΣDDX
1
-1
1950
CAN CZ
2000
EP
1900
AC C
ln CAIR [pg/m3]
0
TE D
2
-2
-3
CAN ln C = -0.018*(Yr)+33.8 r2 = 0.41
-4
310 311
CZ ln C = -0.028*(Yr)+54.2 r2 = 0.62
Figure 4: Relationship between building construction age and indoor air concentration of ΣDDX.
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Median indoor air concentrations of DDX compounds (363 pg/m3 in CZ and 99.6 pg/m3 in CAN)
313
were consistently higher by 4-100 times than the outdoor concentrations in the same regions (Table
314
S17 and S18; outdoor median 88.6 pg/m3 in CZ and 2.05 pg/m3 in CAN). Concentrations of DDX also
315
had a significant relationship with building age (Figure 4). This suggests, as for PCBs, that the indoor
316
concentrations of DDX compounds are due to past use of DDT inside buildings, e.g., use of building
317
materials treated with DDT during construction or renovation, or application of DDT inside homes for
318
pest control. These sources appear to sustain higher concentrations in older buildings. The higher
319
median concentrations in CZ compared to CAN may be influenced by the higher amount of homes
320
sampled in CZ from the time of DDT use (Table S1); the median construction year of sampled homes
321
was 1972 in CZ and 1986 in CAN, which reflects the average ages of the housing stock in each
322
country (average 1970 in CZ and between 1984 and 1995 in CAN) (Ministry of Regional
323
Development of the CR, 2016; Natural Resources Canada, 2017). In both countries, as with the PCBs,
324
DDX was found at low levels in buildings constructed after use was regulated.
325
In dust, DDX median concentrations were 45.8 and 41.5 ng/g in CAN and CZ, respectively (Table 1).
326
Despite differences in DDX in air between countries, the differences between countries in dust were
327
not significant, suggesting that the heterogeneous nature of indoor dust is greater than country
328
differences. Our results were comparable with those reported previously for indoor dust in Denmark
329
(Bräuner et al., 2011) and Pakistan (Ali et al., 2012), but lower than those from Eastern Romania
330
(Dirtu et al., 2012) (see Table S16).
331 332
HCHs
333
was significantly higher than the median of 274 pg/m3 in CAN (Figure 1, Table 1). HCH
334
concentrations in CAN were comparable with those reported in UK homes (Bohlin et al., 2008) and
335
higher than those found in Swedish or Mexican homes (Bohlin et al., 2008). As with PCBs and DDX,
336
HCHs in indoor air were significantly higher by more than 10-fold than outdoor concentrations in the
337
same regions; median outdoor air concentrations were 50.0 pg/m3 in CZ and 12.7 pg/m3 in CAN
338
(Tables S17 and S18). 16
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
312
HCHs were found in air at similar concentrations to PCBs, with a median of 746 pg/m3 in CZ, which
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Over ~84% of HCHs consisted of γ-HCH. Both γ-HCH and α-HCH were much higher in CZ
340
(p=0.003 and p<0.001 respectively) than in CAN, which may reflect the differences in CZ and CAN
341
housing stock age, as noted for DDT. Unlike γ- and α-HCH, which were detected in all air samples, ß-
342
HCH was detected in 68% of samples, and its levels were not significantly different between two
343
countries (p=0.267). α-HCH and γ-HCH isomers were strongly correlated in CZ homes (Pearson’s r =
344
0.59 and 0.80, respectively), but no correlation was found in CAN samples. This could indicate
345
different sources in CAN homes or reflect more newer homes in CAN than CZ, as the γ-HCH/(α-
346
HCH+γ-HCH) ratio was above 0.7 in all CZ samples, but lower than 0.6 in several CAN homes
347
(Table S10). In air, γ-HCH is resistant to photodegradation and, although hypothesized, isomerization
348
of γ-HCH to α-HCH in outdoor air has not yet been proved (Walker et al., 1999). The more plausible
349
explanation for the lower ratio of γ-HCH/(α-HCH/γ-HCH) is possible past combined usage of both
350
lindane and the technical HCH mixture which contains 55 – 80 % of α-HCH compared to γ-HCH (8 –
351
15 %).
352
HCHs in indoor dust were previously reported in only a few studies. CAN concentrations were
353
comparable with those reported in Singapore (Tan et al., 2007) and Pakistan (Ali et al., 2012),
354
whereas CZ levels were higher than in Singapore and Pakistan, but lower than concentrations found in
355
indoor dust in Romania (Dirtu et al., 2012).
356
Chlorobenzenes
357
Levels and geographic patterns of HCB were similar to those of HCHs, with a median air
358
concentration of 711 pg/m3 in CZ, significantly higher than the median concentration of 363 pg/m3 in
359
CAN (Figure 1 and Table 1). Air concentrations of PeCB were significantly lower in CZ, with a
360
median of 87.1 pg/m3, compared with 113 pg/m3 in CAN. PeCB concentrations correlated well with
361
HCB (Pearson’s r = 0.59 and 0.73 in CZ and CAN, respectively). PeCB has multiple past and present
362
sources: it was used independently as a fungicide and flame retardant; existed as an impurity in HCB
363
and other pesticides; it is also a degradation product of HCB; was part of a chlorobenzene mixture
364
used to reduce viscosity of PCB products; and is produced unintentionally during combustion and
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
339
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT industrial processes (Environment Canada, 2005; Stockholm Convention, 2009). The correlation
366
between HCB and PeCB suggests that HCB related sources of PeCB are dominant contributors to
367
indoor levels of PeCB in CAN and CZ.
368
Few studies have reported levels of HCB in indoor air. CAN results were similar to concentrations
369
reported for UK (Bohlin et al., 2008) and France (Laborie et al., 2016), while higher than levels in
370
Sweden and Mexico (Bohlin et al., 2008). One CZ sample contained, to our knowledge, the highest
371
concentration of HCB reported in residential air (1.5 ng/m3).
372
Nearly all dust samples were below detection limits for HCB and PeCB, which is not surprising given
373
their relatively high vapour pressures.
374
Correlation between air and dust concentrations
375
Air and dust concentrations were compared to provide insights into their equilibrium status and hence
376
relative age of these chemicals indoors. This was accomplished by estimating the equilibrium gas-
377
phase air concentration using measured dust concentrations, and comparing with the measured air
378
concentrations (Figure 5). Although PUF-PAS are known to sample bulk (gas+particle) air indoors
379
(Bohlin et al., 2014), here target PCBs and OCPs were largely expected to be in the gas-phase at
380
indoor temperatures. As such, air concentrations obtained from the PUF-PAS were assumed to
381
represent gas-phase air concentrations. Gas-phase air concentrations were estimated using the
382
methods described in Melymuk et al. (2016b), and previously applied by Venier et al. (2016) and
383
Vykoukalová et al. (2017). Details are also given in the SI.
384
Measured air concentrations correlated well with air concentrations estimated from dust for all
385
compounds with detection in >15 samples, except for PCB 180 (Table S20). Spearman correlation
386
coefficients were between 0.34 and 0.76, p<0.05.
387
In general, estimated air concentrations were within one order of magnitude of measured
388
concentrations, as indicated by slopes between 0.22 and 1.1 for the linear regression of estimated vs.
389
measured air concentrations, consistent with equilibrium between air and dust. This suggests stable
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
365
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT indoor conditions and hence no rapid changes in either primary or secondary sources, as would be
391
expected for legacy compounds such as PCBs and OCPs. This contrasts with what is seen with
392
compounds for which primary sources change rapidly over time and for higher molecular weight
393
compounds such as halogenated flame retardants with logKOA >11. High values of logKOA bring a
394
kinetic limitation on air-dust exchange, due to the length of time required to reach equilibrium vs.
395
time scales imposed by air exchange rates relative to volatilization from primary sources in indoor
396
environments (Venier et al., 2016; Weschler and Nazaroff, 2010; Zhang et al., 2011). (b)
0.1
0.01
0.001 0.001
0.01
0.1
1
3
Measured air conc. (pg/m )
TE D
PCB 138: Spearman r: 0.45 (p = 0.03) Slope: 0.45 397
10
SC
Predicted air conc. (pg/m3)
1
1
0.1
M AN U
Predicted air conc. (pg/m3)
(a)
RI PT
390
0.01
0.001
0.0001 0.01
0.1
1
10 3
Measured air conc. (pg/m )
p,p‘-DDT: Spearman r: 0.73 (p < 0.0001) Slope: 0.92
Figure 5 Relationship between estimated and measured air concentrations for (a) PCB 138 and (b) p,p’-DDT. The line indicates a 1:1 relationship between estimated and measured concentrations, and Spearman r is given for correlation between estimated and measured air.
401 402
Implications for human exposure
403
compared with dietary exposure to evaluate the relative importance of indoor environments as a
404
source of human exposure. Equivalent dietary exposure information was not available for Canada.
405
Details of all input variables, equations and assumptions used to estimate exposure are given in Table
406
S21. Under typical exposure scenarios (i.e., median levels in air and dust and average
407
inhalation/ingestion ratios) exposure to Σ7PCBs, HCHs and DDX via indoor pathways was small,
408
representing <5% of total exposure, or up to 10-17% for HCB. However, under high exposure
409
scenarios experienced by those living in the highest level indoor environments and with 95th
EP
398 399 400
AC C
Indoor exposure via inhalation and dust ingestion was estimated for Czech adults and toddlers, and
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 410
percentile intake rates, the contribution could be significant, accounting for 20-60% of total exposure
411
to DDX, PCBs and HCHs.
412 413
Comparison of legacy and current-use SVOCs
414
diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), “novel” halogenated flame retardants (NFRs) in air and dust (Venier et al.,
415
2016), organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPEs) in air and dust (Vykoukalová et al., 2017), and
416
perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in dust (Karásková et al., 2016). This gave us the opportunity
417
to examine the differences between levels of legacy pollutants for which new uses ceased decades ago
418
with those still in use or only recently banned from new use and production.
(a)
(b) 100000
M AN U Dust concentration (ng/g)
10000
1000
100
10
1
423
NFRs
10000
PFCs OCPs PCBs
1000
OPEs
100
10
1 CAN
CZ
Figure 6 Medians of legacy and current-use SVOCs in (a) air, and (b) dust, by country. Data for PBDEs and NFRs are from Venier et al. (2016), PFASs are from Karásková et al. (2016) and OPEs from Vykoukalová et al. (2017). PFASs in air are not available.
EP
420 421 422
CZ
PBDEs
AC C
419
CAN
TE D
Air concentration (pg/m3)
100000
SC
RI PT
Samples used in this study were also analyzed for current-use SVOCs, including polybrominated
424
OPEs had the highest concentrations in both countries and matrices by orders of magnitude (Figure
425
6). This finding points to high usage of OPEs in consumer products and building materials where they
426
are typically added at percentage levels that exceed that of brominated flame retardants (e.g.,
427
Stapleton et al., 2009). However, the air concentrations of the legacy PCBs and OCPs were second to
428
those of OPEs (although two orders of magnitude less), and notably about one order of magnitude
429
higher than the other currently or more recently used compounds (PBDEs, NFRs; Figure 6a), as has
430
been noted previously in the UK (Harrad et al., 2006), Japan (Takigami et al., 2009), and Canada 20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Zhang et al., 2011). PBDEs and NFRs were up to two orders of magnitude higher than PCBs and
432
OCPs in dust in CAN, or comparable in CZ (Figure 6b). The PFAS median was similar to those of
433
PCBs and OCPs in both countries.
434
These patterns raise three points. First, higher dust than air concentrations of “newer” PBDEs and
435
NFRs reflects a move towards the use of lower vapour pressure compounds, presumably intended to
436
avoid the high mobility of legacy POPs conferred by their higher vapour pressures (Wania, 2003).
437
However, considering human exposure, this may reflect merely a shift in the primary exposure
438
pathways from inhalation to dust ingestion, a pathway which is particularly relevant for young
439
children (Jones-Otazo et al., 2005; Larsson et al., 2018; Malliari and Kalantzi, 2017).
440
Second, the elevated concentrations of legacy POPs indoors clearly demonstrates their environmental
441
persistence. The elevated levels in indoor air compared to outdoor air strongly support the influence
442
of ongoing primary sources of POPs indoors, decades after restrictions, in building materials (for
443
PCBs), or due to intentional use and incorporation into building materials (for pesticides). We see that
444
building ventilation and dust cleaning have limited ability to clear these chemicals from indoor
445
environments. Moreover, differences in the typical age of the housing stock between countries, e.g.,
446
older homes in CZ, are associated with differences in levels of legacy POPs which could lead to
447
regional differences in residential exposure.
448
Third, these levels shed light on the difficult task of effective chemical management. It is sobering to
449
consider the effectiveness of chemical regulations: nearly 15 years after international controls were
450
implemented through the Stockholm Convention and 40 years after PCBs were first regulated at
451
national levels, the “Dirty Dozen” continue to be found at elevated levels in indoor environments.
452
Higher levels of PCBs in homes built prior to the initial regulations, and continuing exposure to these
453
PCBs, demonstrate the difficulty in enacting regulations that provide for population-wide safety.
454
These results emphasize that regulation of new uses does not mean that the chemical is banned, which
455
gives the impression of “gone”.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
431
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CONCLUSIONS
457
PCBs and OCPs were consistently detected in indoor air and dust in homes from Canada and Czech
458
Republic at levels comparable to those reported in similar environments over the past 15 years. Some
459
country-specific differences were discernable from past usage patterns, such as the congener profiles
460
of PCBs between Canada and the Czech Republic, and higher indoor concentrations of DDX and
461
HCH in CZ. Relationships between indoor air concentrations and building age showed higher levels
462
in older buildings and support the hypothesis of continuing active primary indoor sources of legacy
463
POPs as an important contributor to indoor levels. It is also important to note the presence of legacy
464
compounds in buildings constructed after regulations were enacted. Indoor air concentrations were, on
465
average, 10 times higher than those outdoors, suggesting on-going opportunities for human exposure.
466
Decades after national and international restrictions on new uses, air concentrations of PCBs and
467
OCPs remain stubbornly consistent, reflecting their persistence indoors, the importance of both
468
primary and secondary sources, and the challenges faced in managing chemicals after they have been
469
used widely.
470
Acknowledgments
471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478
This work was supported by the Czech-American Scientific Cooperation Program (AMVIS/KONTAKT II, LH12074). RECETOX research infrastructure was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (LM2015051) and the European Structural and Investment Funds (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001761). Support in Canada was provided by Allergy, Genes and Environment Network (AllerGenNCE) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). We thank Joseph Okeme and Amandeep Saini (University of Toronto) for collecting samples in Canada. We also thank all volunteers in Bloomington (IN, USA), Toronto (Canada) and Brno (Czech Republic) for their participation.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
456
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
REFERENCES
480 481
Abb, M., Breuer, J. V., Zeitz, C., Lorenz, W., 2010. Analysis of pesticides and PCBs in waste wood and house dust. Chemosphere 81, 488–493.
482 483 484
Ali, N., Van Den Eede, N., Dirtu, A.C., Neels, H., Covaci, A., 2012. Assessment of human exposure to indoor organic contaminants via dust ingestion in Pakistan. Indoor Air 22, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00757.x
485 486 487
Ampleman, M.D., Martinez, A., DeWall, J., Rawn, D.F.K., Hornbuckle, K.C., Thorne, P.S., 2015. Inhalation and dietary exposure to PCBs in urban and rural cohorts via congener-specific measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5048039
488 489
ATSDR, 2000. Toxicological profile for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp17.pdf
490 491
Bailey, R.E., van Wijk, D., Thomas, P.C., 2009. Sources and prevalence of pentachlorobenzene in the environment. Chemosphere 75, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.038
492 493 494 495
Bennett, D.H., Moran, R.E., Wu, X., Tulve, N.S., Clifton, M.S., Colón, M., Weathers, W., Sjödin, A., Jones, R., Hertz-Picciotto, I., 2014. Polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) concentrations and resulting exposure in homes in California: Relationships among passive air, surface wipe and dust concentrations, and temporal variability. Indoor Air 25, 220–229.
496 497 498
Blanchard, O., Glorennec, P., Mercier, F., Bonvallot, N., Chevrier, C., Ramalho, O., Mandin, C., Bot, B. Le, 2014. Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor air and settled dust in 30 French dwellings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 3959–3969. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405269q
499 500 501 502 503
Bohlin, P., Audy, O., Škrdlíková, L., Kukučka, P., Vojta, Š., Přibylová, P., Prokeš, R., Čupr, P., Klánová, J., 2014. Evaluation and guidelines for using polyurethane foam (PUF) passive air samplers in double-dome chambers to assess semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in nonindustrial indoor environments. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 16, 2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00305E
504 505 506
Bohlin, P., Jones, K.C., Tovalin, H., Strandberg, B., 2008. Observations on persistent organic pollutants in indoor and outdoor air using passive polyurethane foam samplers. Atmos. Environ. 42, 7234–7241.
507 508 509
Booij, P., Holoubek, I., Klánová, J., Kohoutek, J., Dvorská, A., Magulová, K., Al-Zadjali, S., Čupr, P., 2016. Current implications of past DDT indoor spraying in Oman. Sci. Total Environ. 550, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.044
510 511 512 513
Borůvková, J., Gregor, J., Šebková, K., Bednářová, Z., Kalina, J., Hůlek, R., Dušek, L., Holoubek, I., Klánová, J., 2015. GENASIS – Global Environmental Assessment and Information System [online] [WWW Document]. Masaryk. univerzita, 2015 [cit. 2017-06-19]. Available http//www.genasis.cz. Verze 2.0. ISSN 1805-3181.
514 515
Bräuner, E.V., Mayer, P., Gunnarsen, L., Vorkamp, K., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., 2011. Occurrence of organochlorine pesticides in indoor dust. J. Environ. Monit. 13, 522–6.
516 517
Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 2015. PCB Regulations [WWW Document]. Canada Gaz. Part II. URL http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2008-273/
518 519 520
Colt, J.S., Severson, R.K., Lubin, J., Rothman, N., Camann, D., Davis, S., Cerhan, J.R., Cozen, W., Hartge, P., 2005. Organochlorines in Carpet Dust and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Epidemiology 16, 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000164811.25760.f1
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
479
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Diamond, M.L., 2017. Toxic chemicals as enablers and poisoners of the technosphere. Anthr. Rev. 4, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019617726308
523 524 525
Diamond, M.L., Melymuk, L., Csiszar, S.A., Robson, M., 2010. Estimation of PCB stocks, emissions, and urban fate: will our policies reduce concentrations and exposure? Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2777–83.
526 527 528
Dirtu, A.C., Ali, N., Van den Eede, N., Neels, H., Covaci, A., 2012. Country specific comparison for profile of chlorinated, brominated and phosphate organic contaminants in indoor dust. Case study for Eastern Romania, 2010. Environ. Int. 49, 1–8.
529 530 531
Environment Canada, 2017. Toxic substances list: hexachlorobenzene [WWW Document]. URL https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/management-toxicsubstances/list-canadian-environmental-protection-act/hexachlorobenzene.html
532 533 534
Environment Canada, 2013a. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [WWW Document]. URL https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/management-toxicsubstances/list-canadian-environmental-protection-act/dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.html
535 536 537 538 539
Environment Canada, 2013b. Update to Canada’s National Implementation Plan under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants: Chapter 3 – Measures to Reduce or Eliminate Releases from Intentional Production and Use, Import and Export [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=En&n=FDB6031D-1&xml=FDB6031D-2DC9-48898B32-22E4B09C8FE5&offset=4&toc=show
540 541 542
Environment Canada, 2005. Pentachlorobenzene (QCB) and tetrachlorobenzenes (TeCBs) proposed risk management strategy [WWW Document]. URL http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/ec/En40-680-2005-eng.pdf
543 544
Erickson, M.D., Kaley, R.G., 2011. Applications of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 18, 135–51.
545 546 547
Frame, G.M., Cochran, J.W., Bøwadt, S.S., 1996. Complete PCB congener distributions for 17 aroclor mixtures determined by 3 HRGC systems optimized for comprehensive, quantitative, congener-specific analysis. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 19, 657–668.
548 549 550
Frederiksen, M., Meyer, H.W., Ebbehøj, N.E., Gunnarsen, L., 2012. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in indoor air originating from sealants in contaminated and uncontaminated apartments within the same housing estate. Chemosphere 89, 473–9.
551 552 553
Harrad, S.J., Hazrati, S., Ibarra, C., 2006. Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls in indoor air and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor air and dust in Birmingham, United Kingdom: implications for human exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4633–8.
554 555 556 557
Harrad, S.J., Ibarra, C., Robson, M., Melymuk, L., Zhang, X., Diamond, M.L., Douwes, J., 2009. Polychlorinated biphenyls in domestic dust from Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States: Implications for human exposure. Chemosphere 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.020
558 559 560
Hazrati, S., Harrad, S.J., 2007. Calibration of polyurethane foam (PUF) disk passive air samplers for quantitative measurement of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs): factors influencing sampling rates. Chemosphere 67, 448–55.
561 562
Health Canada, 2009. Lindane Risk Assessment [WWW Document]. URL http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/arla-pmra/H113-5-2009-8-eng.pdf
563
Herkert, N.J., Jahnke, J.C., Hornbuckle, K.C., 2018. Emissions of Tetrachlorobiphenyls (PCBs 47, 51, 24
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
521 522
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and 68) from Polymer Resin on Kitchen Cabinets as a Non-Aroclor Source to Residential Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00966
564 565
Herrick, R.F., Stewart, J.H., Allen, J.G., 2016. Review of PCBs in US schools: a brief history, an estimate of the number of impacted schools, and an approach for evaluating indoor air samples. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 1975–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4574-8
569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577
Holoubek, I., Adamec, V., Bartoš, M., Bláha, K., Bláha, L., Budňáková, M., Černa, M., Čupr, P., Demnerová, K., Drápal, J., Hajšlová, J., Hanzálková, M., Holoubková, I., Hrabětová, S., Jech, L., Klánová, J., Kohoutek, J., Kužílek, V., Machálek, P., Matějů, V., Matoušek, J., Matoušek, M., Mestřík, V., Novák, J., Ocelka, T., Pekárek, V., Petrlík, J., Petira, O., Provazník, K., Punčochář, M., Rieder, M., Ruprich, J., Sáňka, M., Tomaniová, M., Vácha, R., Volka, K., Zbíral, J., 2006. The National Implementation Plan for Implementation of the Stockholm Convention in the Czech Republic [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/Implementation/NationalImplementationPlans/NIPTransmission/tabid/253/D efault.aspx
578 579 580
Holt, E., Audy, O., Booij, P., Melymuk, L., Prokeš, R., Klánová, J., 2017. Organochlorine pesticides in the indoor air of a theatre and museum in the Czech Republic: Inhalation exposure and cancer risk. Sci. Total Environ. 609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.203
581 582
Hu, D., Hornbuckle, K.C., 2010. Inadvertent polychlorinated biphenyls in commercial paint pigments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2822–7.
583 584 585 586
Jones-Otazo, H.A., Clarke, J.P., Diamond, M.L., Archbold, J.A., Ferguson, G., Harner, T., Richardson, G.M., Ryan, J.J., Wilford, B.H., 2005. Is house dust the missing exposure pathway for PBDEs? An analysis of the urban fate and human exposure to PBDEs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 5121–5130.
587 588 589
Karásková, P., Venier, M., Melymuk, L., Bečanová, J., Vojta, Š., Prokeš, R., Diamond, M.L., Klánová, J., 2016. Perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in household dust in Central Europe and North America. Environ. Int. 94, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.031
590 591 592 593
Klepeis, N.E., Nelson, W.C., Ott, W.R., Robinson, J.P., Tsang, a M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V, Hern, S.C., Engelmann, W.H., 2001. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 11, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165
594 595 596
Kohler, M., Tremp, J., Zennegg, M., Seiler, C., Minder-Kohler, S., Beck, M., Lienemann, P., Wegmann, L., Schmid, P., 2005. Joint sealants: an overlooked diffuse source of polychlorinated biphenyls in buildings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 1967–73.
597 598 599
Laborie, S., Moreau-Guigon, E., Alliot, F., Desportes, A., Oziol, L., Chevreuil, M., 2016. A new analytical protocol for the determination of 62 endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air. Talanta 147, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.028
600 601 602
Larsson, K., de Wit, C.A., Sellström, U., Sahlström, L., Lindh, C.H., Berglund, M., 2018. Brominated flame retardants and organophosphate esters in preschool dust and children’s hand wipes. Environ. Sci. Technol. acs.est.8b00184. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00184
603 604 605
Leone, A.D., Ulrich, E.M., E. Bodnar, C., Falconer, R.L., Hites, R.A., 2000. Organochlorine pesticide concentrations and enantiomer fractions for chlordane in indoor air from the US cornbelt. Atmos. Environ. 34, 4131–4138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00247-8
606 607
Lyall, K., Croen, L.A., Sjödin, A., Yoshida, C.K., Zerbo, O., Kharrazi, M., Windham, G.C., 2016. Polychlorinated Biphenyl and Organochlorine Pesticide Concentrations in Maternal Mid-
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
566 567 568
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Pregnancy Serum Samples: Association with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. Environ. Health Perspect. 125. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP277
608 609
Malliari, E., Kalantzi, O.-I., 2017. Children’s exposure to brominated flame retardants in indoor environments - A review. Environ. Int. 108, 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.011
613 614
Marcotte, S., Estel, L., Leboucher, S., Minchin, S., 2014. Occurrence of organic biocides in the air and dust at the Natural History Museum of Rouen, France. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 68–72.
615 616 617
Marek, R.F., Thorne, P.S., Herkert, N.J., Awad, A.M., Hornbuckle, K.C., 2017. Airborne PCBs and OH-PCBs Inside and Outside Urban and Rural U.S. Schools. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 7853– 7860. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01910
618 619 620 621
Matz, C., Stieb, D., Davis, K., Egyed, M., Rose, A., Chou, B., Brion, O., 2014. Effects of Age, Season, Gender and Urban-Rural Status on Time-Activity: Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey 2 (CHAPS 2). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 2108–2124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110202108
622 623 624
Melymuk, L., Bohlin-Nizzetto, P., Kukučka, P., Vojta, Š., Kalina, J., Cupr, P., Klánová, J., Čupr, P., Klánová, J., 2016a. Seasonality and indoor/outdoor relationships of flame retardants and PCBs in residential air. Environ. Pollut. 218, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.018
625 626 627 628
Melymuk, L., Bohlin-Nizzetto, P., Vojta, Š., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Audy, O., Přibylová, P., Klánová, J., 2016b. Distribution of legacy and emerging semivolatile organic contaminants in five indoor matrices in a residential environment. Chemosphere 153, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.012
629
Ministry of Regional Development of the CR, 2016. Housing in the Czech Republic in figures.
630 631 632 633
National Centre for Toxic Compounds, 2017. Czech Republic Updated National Implementation Plan for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in the period 2012-2017 [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/Implementation/NIPs/NIPTransmission/tabid/253/Default.aspx
634 635 636 637
Natural Resources Canada, 2017. Residential Housing Stock and Floor Space - Residential End-Use Model [WWW Document]. Off. Energy Effic. URL http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/corporate/statistics/neud/dpa/showTable.cfm?type=HB§or=res&juris =00&rn=11&page=3 (accessed 4.30.18).
638 639 640 641
Nielsen, O.-K., Plejdrup, M.S., Winther, M., Nielsen, M., Fauser, P., Albrektsen, R., Mikkelsen, M.H., Hjelgaard, K., Hoffmann, L., Thomsen, M., Bruun, H.G., 2013. Danish emission inventory for hexachlorobenzene and polychlorinated biphenyls, Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 103.
642 643 644
Robson, M., Melymuk, L., Csiszar, S.A., Giang, A., Diamond, M.L., Helm, P.A., 2010. Continuing sources of PCBs: the significance of building sealants. Environ. Int. 36, 506–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.03.009
645 646 647
Rosenbaum, P.F., Weinstock, R.S., Silverstone, A.E., Sjödin, A., Pavuk, M., 2017. Metabolic syndrome is associated with exposure to organochlorine pesticides in Anniston, AL, United States. Environ. Int. 108, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.017
648 649 650
Rudel, R.A., Dodson, R.E., Perovich, L.J., Morello-Frosch, R., Camann, D.E., Zuniga, M.M., Yau, A.Y., Just, A.C., Brody, J.G., 2010. Semivolatile endocrine-disrupting compounds in paired indoor and outdoor air in two northern California communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44,
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
610 611 612
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6583–90.
651
Rudel, R.A., Seryak, L.M., Brody, J.G., 2008. PCB-containing wood floor finish is a likely source of elevated PCBs in residents’ blood, household air and dust: a case study of exposure. Environ. Heal. 7, 2.
655 656 657
Saini, A., Okeme, J.O., Goosey, E.R., Diamond, M.L., 2015. Calibration of two passive air samplers for monitoring phthalates and brominated flame-retardants in indoor air. Chemosphere 137, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.099
658 659 660
Schieweck, A., Delius, W., Siwinski, N., Vogtenrath, W., Genning, C., Salthammer, T., 2007. Occurrence of organic and inorganic biocides in the museum environment. Atmos. Environ. 41, 3266–3275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.061
661 662
Scott, G.R., Chosidow, O., 2011. European guideline for the management of scabies, 2010. Int. J. STD AIDS 22, 301–303. https://doi.org/10.1258/ijsa.2011.011112
663 664 665
Shin, H.-M., McKone, T.E., Tulve, N.S., Clifton, M.S., Bennett, D.H., 2013. Indoor residence times of semivolatile organic compounds: model estimation and field evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 859–67.
666 667 668
Stapleton, H.M., Klosterhaus, S.L., Eagle, S., Fuh, J., Meeker, J.D., Blum, A., Webster, T.F., 2009. Detection of organophosphate flame retardants in furniture foam and U.S. house dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 7490–5.
669 670 671
Stockholm Convention, 2009. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) as amended in 2009 [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/Overview/tabid/3351/Default.aspx
672 673 674
Stockholm Convention, 2008. The 12 initial POPs under the Stockholm Convention [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/The12InitialPOPs/tabid/296/Default.aspx
675 676 677
Takigami, H., Suzuki, G., Hirai, Y., Sakai, S., 2009. Brominated flame retardants and other polyhalogenated compounds in indoor air and dust from two houses in Japan. Chemosphere 76, 270–7.
678 679 680
Tan, J., Cheng, S.M., Loganath, A., Chong, Y.S., Obbard, J.P., 2007. Selected organochlorine pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in house dust in Singapore. Chemosphere 68, 1675–82.
681 682 683 684
Taniyasu, S., Kannan, K., Holoubek, I., Ansorgova, A., Horii, Y., Hanari, N., Yamashita, N., Aldous, K.M., 2003. Isomer-specific analysis of chlorinated biphenyls, naphthalenes and dibenzofurans in Delor: polychlorinated biphenyl preparations from the former Czechoslovakia. Environ. Pollut. 126, 169–178.
685 686 687 688
Tue, N.M., Takahashi, S., Suzuki, G., Isobe, T., Viet, P.H., Kobara, Y., Seike, N., Zhang, G., Sudaryanto, A., Tanabe, S., 2013. Contamination of indoor dust and air by polychlorinated biphenyls and brominated flame retardants and relevance of non-dietary exposure in Vietnamese informal e-waste recycling sites. Environ. Int. 51, 160–7.
689 690
Turusov, V., Rakitsky, V., Tomatis, L., 2002. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): ubiquity, persistence, and risks. Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 125–8.
691 692
US EPA, 2017. Policy and Guidance for Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCBs) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.epa.gov/pcbs/policy-and-guidance-polychlorinated-biphenyl-pcbs
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
652 653 654
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT van den Berg, H., 2009. Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, 1656–1663. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900785
696 697 698 699
Venier, M., Audy, O., Vojta, Š., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Melymuk, L., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Okeme, J.O., Saini, A., Diamond, M.L., Klánová, J., 2016. Brominated flame retardants in indoor environment - comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries. Environ. Int. 94, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029
700 701 702
Vorhees, D.J., Cullen, A.C., Altshul, L.M., 1997. Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Residential Indoor Air and Outdoor Air near a Superfund Site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 3612– 3618.
703 704 705 706
Vorkamp, K., 2016. An overlooked environmental issue? A review of the inadvertent formation of PCB-11 and other PCB congeners and their occurrence in consumer products and in the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 541, 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.019
707 708 709 710
Vykoukalová, M., Venier, M., Vojta, Š., Melymuk, L., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Prokeš, R., Okeme, J.O., Saini, A., Diamond, M.L., Klánová, J., 2017. Organophosphate esters flame retardants in the indoor environment. Environ. Int. 106, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.020
711 712 713
Walker, K., Vallero, D.A., Lewis, R.G., 1999. Factors Influencing the Distribution of Lindane and Other Hexachlorocyclohexanes in the Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 4373–4378. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990647n
714 715 716
Wania, F., 2003. Assessing the potential of persistent organic chemicals for long-range transport and accumulation in polar regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 1344–1351. https://doi.org/10.1021/es026019e
717 718
Weschler, C.J., Nazaroff, W.W., 2010. SVOC partitioning between the gas phase and settled dust indoors. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3609–3620.
719 720
WHO/IPCS, 1997. Environmental Health Criteria 195: Hexachlorobenzene [WWW Document]. URL http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc195.htm
721 722
WHO/IPCS, 1993. Environmental Health Criteria 140: Polychlorinated biphenyls and terphenyls (2nd ed.) [WWW Document]. URL http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc140.htm
723 724 725
Willett, K.L., Ulrich, E.M., Hites, R.A., 1998. Differential Toxicity and Environmental Fates of Hexachlorocyclohexane Isomers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2197–2207. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9708530
726 727 728 729
Wilson, L.R., Palmer, P.M., Belanger, E.E., Cayo, M.R., Durocher, L.A., Hwang, S.-A.A., Fitzgerald, E.F., 2011. Indoor Air Polychlorinated Biphenyl Concentrations in Three Communities Along the Upper Hudson River, New York. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9627-x
730 731
Wilson, N.K., Chuang, J.C., Lyu, C., 2001. Levels of persistent organic pollutants in several child day care centers. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 11, 449–458.
732 733 734
Zhang, X., Diamond, M.L., Robson, M., Harrad, S.J., 2011. Sources, emissions, and fate of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated biphenyls indoors in Toronto, Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3268–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102767g
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
693 694 695
735 28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights: PCBs and OCPs were detected air and dust from homes in Canada and Czech Rep.
•
Higher concentrations of pesticides were found in Czech homes
•
Older buildings contained higher concentrations of PCBs and DDTs
•
Composition of PCB congeners differs between Czech and Canadian homes
•
Levels of PCBs, OCPs exceed those of in-use compounds >30 years after restrictions
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
•