PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic

PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic

Accepted Manuscript PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic Ondr...

884KB Sizes 2 Downloads 26 Views

Accepted Manuscript PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic Ondrej Audy, Lisa Melymuk, Marta Venier, Simon Vojta, Jitka Becanova, Kevin Romanak, Martina Vykoukalova, Roman Prokes, Petr Kukucka, Miriam L. Diamond, Jana Klanova PII:

S0045-6535(18)30858-0

DOI:

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.016

Reference:

CHEM 21344

To appear in:

ECSN

Received Date: 3 January 2018 Revised Date:

1 May 2018

Accepted Date: 2 May 2018

Please cite this article as: Audy, O., Melymuk, L., Venier, M., Vojta, S., Becanova, J., Romanak, K., Vykoukalova, M., Prokes, R., Kukucka, P., Diamond, M.L., Klanova, J., PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - A comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic, Chemosphere (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 2 3

PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in indoor environments - a comparison of indoor contamination in Canada and Czech Republic

4 5

Ondrej Audy,1 Lisa Melymuk,1,* Marta Venier,2 Simon Vojta,1,+ Jitka Becanova,1,+ Kevin Romanak,2 Martina Vykoukalova, 1 Roman Prokes,1 Petr Kukucka,1 Miriam L. Diamond,3 Jana Klanova1

7

1

8 9

2

10

3

RI PT

6 RECETOX, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, pavilion A29, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic

School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 702 Walnut Grove Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405 United States

SC

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto, Canada M5S 3B1

11 * Corresponding author: Lisa Melymuk

13

Email: [email protected]

14

Phone: +420 549 493 995

15 16

Address: RECETOX, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, pavilion A29, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic

17 +

Present address of S. Vojta and J. Becanova: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882-1197, USA

20

Keywords: polychlorinated biphenyls; organochlorine pesticides; DDT; HCB; HCH; country differences

EP

21 22

TE D

18 19

M AN U

12

AC C

23

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT

25

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) are restricted compounds

26

that are ubiquitously detected in the environment, including in indoor matrices such as air and

27

residential dust. We report concentrations of PCBs and selected OCPs in indoor air and dust from

28

homes in Canada (23 homes) and Czech Republic (20 homes). Indoor air concentrations of PCBs and

29

OCPs were ~10 times higher than that outdoors. PCB concentrations of ~450 ng/m3 were similar in

30

both countries, higher in homes built before the restrictions on PCBs, and had congener profiles

31

consistent with PCB mixtures manufactured or used in each country. All OCP air concentrations were

32

higher in the Czech Republic than in the Canadian samples, suggesting greater indoor use of, for

33

example, DDT and HCH. These data emphasize the persistence of these organochlorine compounds

34

indoors and their presence in homes even after new usage was prohibited. Indoor levels of these

35

legacy POPs remain at similar levels to compounds of current concern, such as brominated flame

36

retardants and perfluorinated alkyl substances, emphasizing that they deserve ongoing attention in

37

view of knowledge of OCP toxicity.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

24

AC C

EP

TE D

38

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

INTRODUCTION

40

In 1995, the United Nations Environment Program requested that international controls be placed on

41

12 persistent organic pollutants or POPs (the “Dirty Dozen”), including polychlorinated biphenyls

42

(PCBs) and nine organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). The impetus came from decades of research that

43

documented their persistence and ability to cause harm to human health and the environment. These

44

concerns led to the Stockholm Convention, which entered into force in 2004 with 152 countries as

45

signatories (Stockholm Convention, 2008). The Convention called on the parties to “prohibit and/or

46

eliminate the production and use, as well as the import and export” of the 12 POPs. For PCBs, this

47

came some 30 years after regulations were passed in several countries to control production and new

48

uses (Diamond et al., 2010). Still, today measurements continue to document human and

49

environmental exposure to, and harm from, many of the “Dirty Dozen” (Diamond, 2017; Lyall et al.,

50

2016; Rosenbaum et al., 2017).

51

The indoor environment is an important pathway for human exposure to semi-volatile organic

52

compounds (SVOCs), including the “Dirty Dozen”, via air and dust inhalation and dust ingestion

53

(Booij et al., 2016; Dirtu et al., 2012; Harrad et al., 2006; Marek et al., 2017). PCBs and OCPs have

54

been found in indoor air and dust due to past uses (i.e., primary sources; Booij et al., 2016;

55

Frederiksen et al., 2012; Rudel et al., 2008), the subsequent contamination of and release from indoor

56

materials (i.e., secondary sources; Marek et al., 2017), from current poorly-quantified sources such as

57

impurities in other chemicals (Vorkamp, 2016), and emissions from new building materials and

58

consumer products (Herkert et al., 2018; Hu and Hornbuckle, 2010). Levels of PCBs and often OCPs

59

in indoor air are higher than in outdoor air (Harrad et al., 2006; Melymuk et al., 2016a; Rudel et al.,

60

2010), and there is no recent evidence of declines in the indoor levels (Harrad et al., 2006). This

61

points to POPs used or released indoors being more persistent than outdoors as fewer opportunities

62

exist for losses through air flow and photolytic reactions (Bennett et al., 2014; Shin et al., 2013).

63

Potential risks arise from exposure to POPs through indoor pathways as people in developed countries

64

spend >90% of their time indoors (Klepeis et al., 2001; Matz et al., 2014), and inhalation exposure

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

39

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from indoor environments can contribute up to one-third of total exposure for lower-chlorinated PCB

66

congeners (Ampleman et al., 2015).

67

PCBs were high production volume chemicals used worldwide from the 1940s to 1980s, with global

68

production of ~1.4 million tonnes. 650 000 tonnes were produced in USA from 1930 to 1977 by

69

Monsanto as Aroclor mixtures, and 21 000 tonnes in Slovakia (former Czechoslovakia) from 1959-

70

1984 by Chemko Stražské as Delor mixtures (Breivik et al. 2002). PCBs used in Canada were

71

imported Aroclors from USA. PCBs were used as coolants, insulating fluids in transformers and

72

capacitors, stabilizing additives in PVC, and as plasticizers in paint and building sealants, as well as in

73

numerous other applications (WHO/IPCS, 1993). Ongoing primary use continues in older building

74

materials and electrical equipment in countries that are not signatories to the Stockholm Convention

75

and thus have not regulated their removal and destruction, notably USA (US EPA, 2017). Even for

76

signatories of the Convention, regulations may specify only partial removal and destruction. For

77

example, Canada mandated removal by 2009 of equipment containing PCBs <500 mg/kg or >50 to

78

<500 mg PCB/kg if it is located in a sensitive location such as a child care facility or drinking water

79

treatment plant and removal of most uses (e.g., PCBs in light ballasts, pole-top electrical

80

transformers) by 2025 (Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 2015). The Czech Republic required

81

removal of materials with >500 mg/kg PCB content by 2010 (National Centre for Toxic Compounds,

82

2017). These regulations may not cover all PCB-containing materials, such as building sealants, for

83

which concentrations can be less than these “action” levels (Diamond et al., 2010; Robson et al.,

84

2010) or exemptions (e.g., in colouring pigments, electrical capacitors that are “an integral part of a

85

consumer product”) (Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 2015). Nonetheless, these PCB-

86

containing materials may be a concern in many indoor environments as they can lead to elevated

87

indoor levels of PCBs and thus higher exposure (Frederiksen et al., 2012; Herrick et al., 2016; Marek

88

et al., 2017).

89

DDT was used as a potent insecticide in both indoor and outdoor applications. Although new uses

90

were prohibited when it was added to the Stockholm Convention in 2004, three countries currently

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

65

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT produce DDT and it is used in about 15 countries, primarily to control mosquito vectors of malaria

92

(Stockholm Convention, 2009; van den Berg, 2009). DDT use was permitted in Canada until the mid-

93

1970s, but a total ban on all uses only took place in 1985 “with the understanding that existing stocks

94

would be sold, used or disposed of by December 31, 1990” (Environment Canada, 2013a). DDT was

95

registered for use from 1951 to 1973 in Czechoslovakia; remaining unused stocks were destroyed in

96

the 1990s (Holoubek et al., 2006; Turusov et al., 2002). Past indoor uses included direct pest control

97

in homes and agricultural buildings, and in combination with PCBs, as a wood preservative (Abb et

98

al., 2010). DDT undergoes degradation to DDD and subsequently to the more stable DDE.

99

HCH was first produced as “technical HCH” which contained about 14% γ-HCH, the only conformer

SC

RI PT

91

with insecticidal properties, 65–70% α-HCH, 7–10% β-HCH, and about 7% δ-HCH (Willett et al.,

101

1998). The use of technical HCH was banned in Canada in 1971. Technical HCH was replaced on the

102

market by purified (90%) γ-HCH, also called lindane. The major use of γ-HCH was to treat crops,

103

seeds, soils and livestock, with additional uses as a pharmaceutical. Combined with DDT, it was also

104

used to treat wood, including various art objects (Holt et al., 2017; Marcotte et al., 2014; Schieweck et

105

al., 2007). Agricultural use of γ-HCH is restricted in the Czech Republic (since 1977; Holoubek et al.,

106

2006) and Canada (since 2004; Health Canada, 2009), and the Czech Republic and Canada stopped

107

the sale of all HCH-containing pharmaceuticals in 2008 (Scott and Chosidow, 2011) and 2011

108

(Environment Canada, 2013b), respectively.

109

Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) was a fungicide produced to treat seeds and preserve wood (WHO/IPCS,

110

1997). Pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) is an impurity originating during the synthesis of several

111

chlorinated pesticides, including HCB (Environment Canada, 2005). A major current source of both

112

PeCB and HCB is incomplete combustion of organic material, e.g. solid waste and biomass burning

113

(Bailey et al., 2009; Environment Canada, 2005; Nielsen et al., 2013). HCB was used primarily as a

114

soil treatment in Czech Republic, with production ceasing in 1968 and use in 1977 (Holoubek et al.,

115

2006). Canada first regulated HCB in 2003 and then strengthened these regulations in 2012

116

(Environment Canada, 2017).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

100

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT PCBs and OCPs continue to be detected in indoor air (Blanchard et al., 2014; Bohlin et al., 2008;

118

Harrad et al., 2006; Laborie et al., 2016; Tue et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2011) and

119

in dust from homes, offices, and public buildings (Ali et al., 2012; Bräuner et al., 2011; Dirtu et al.,

120

2012; Harrad et al., 2009; Tan et al., 2007). Although the major uses of PCBs and OCPs were in

121

agriculture or in closed industrial applications, indoor concentrations are frequently found to be higher

122

than outdoor levels, confirming their indoor persistence and the importance of indoor

123

microenvironments in the total exposure to these chemicals decades after restrictions on use

124

(Melymuk et al., 2016a; Vorhees et al., 1997; Wilson et al., 2011).

125

In this study we report levels of PCBs and OCPs in indoor air and dust from homes in Czech Republic

126

and Canada. We compare concentrations in the context of past production, usage and regulation, and

127

evaluate the relative significance of legacy indoor pollutants relative to newer compounds, such as

128

flame retardants. We also interpret the data in terms of effectiveness of regulatory controls since

129

PCBs and OCPs were among the first chemicals to come under control through the Stockholm

130

Convention.

131

MATERIALS AND METHODS

132

Sampling

133

Samples were taken from 43 houses and apartments from two locations: 23 homes in Toronto, Canada

134

(CAN) and 20 homes in Brno, Czech Republic (CZ) (Table S1) in June-August 2013. These locations

135

were not influenced by local industrial emissions and were representative of domestic chemical use

136

patterns. At least one room was sampled in each home and a second room was sampled in ~10 houses

137

from each country, resulting in 35 samples from CAN and 30 from CZ. Participation was voluntary

138

with written consent given and no compensation. Air samples were collected by 28-day deployments

139

of polyurethane foam passive air samplers (PUF-PAS, Figure S1) and floor dust samples were

140

collected with a household vacuum cleaner. All details regarding study locations, sampling and

141

analysis are described by Venier et al. (2016) and are summarized briefly herein.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

117

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT All sampling materials were pre-cleaned before sampling by Soxhlet extraction (8 h in acetone, then 8

143

h in toluene). On day one, PUF-PAS were deployed in either single bowl (CAN) or double bowl (CZ)

144

configurations. After 28 days, PUF-PAS were collected, along with floor dust. Floor dust was

145

collected using a polyester sock inserted into the hose of a household vacuum cleaner, and the largest

146

possible accessible area in each room was sampled. All sampled media were wrapped in clean

147

aluminum foil, sealed, labeled and subsequently stored at -20°C until analysis.

148

Sample analysis

149

In this paper we focus on seven indicator PCB congeners (∑7PCB is the sum of PCB 28, 52, 101, 118,

150

138, 153, and 180), p,p’-DDT and related compounds (DDX is the sum of o,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDD, o,p’-

151

DDD, p,p’-DDE, and o,p’-DDE), HCB, PeCB and HCH isomers (HCHs defined as the sum of α-, ß-,

152

and γ-HCH) (Table S2).

153

Extraction and fractionation of samples is described in detail in Venier et al. (2016). Before

154

extraction, all samples were spiked with known amounts of recovery standards (PCB 30 and 185

155

(Absolute Standards, Hamden, CT, USA) for CAN and CZ samples. Socks with dust were weighed,

156

the dust was sieved to <500 µm, approximately 100 mg were separated for analysis, and the excess

157

dust was archived. The sock was rinsed with 30 mL hexane in acetone (1:1 v:v), and the solvent was

158

combined with weighed dust. Dust was sonicated in 30 mL of 1:1 acetone:hexane (v:v); left to settle

159

for 30 minutes, and the supernatant was decanted. The procedure was repeated 2 additional times with

160

10 mL of fresh solvent, and the extracts were combined. PUFs were extracted with 150 mL of

161

dichloromethane (DCM) using automated warm Soxhlet extraction (Büchi B-811, Switzerland), the

162

volume of the combined extracts was reduced under a N2 stream and split 70:30 by weight. The 70%

163

aliquot was treated by sulfuric acid-modified silica and this extract was used for analysis of PCBs and

164

OCPs. The remaining 30% of the extract was used for other analyses (Venier et al., 2016;

165

Vykoukalová et al., 2017).

166

Final extracts were analyzed for PCBs and OCPs by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

167

(GC-MS/MS) using an Agilent 7890B GC coupled with an Agilent 7000B QQQ MS-MS. Three µL 7

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

142

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT was injected in pulsed splitless mode. Compounds were separated on a 60 m x 250 µm x 0.25 µm

169

HT8 capillary column (SGE, Australia) and analysed in electron impact (EI) mode. For each

170

compound two selected multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions (quantitative and qualifier

171

ion) and their respective ratios were monitored to ensure correct compound identification and

172

quantification. Samples were quantified using an internal standard added prior to instrumental

173

analysis (PCB-121, Absolute Standards, Hamden, CT, USA). Further GC-MS/MS parameters are

174

given in Tables S3 and S4.

175

Masses collected by passive air samplers were converted to concentrations based on the sampling

176

rates determined in a dedicated calibration study (details in SI). Sampling rates of 1.1 m3/day were

177

used for the single-bowl sampler (CAN) and 0.63 m3/day were used for the double bowl sampler

178

(CZ). These rates are comparable to indoor sampling rates previously determined for PUF-PAS

179

samplers (Bohlin et al., 2014; Hazrati and Harrad, 2007; Saini et al., 2015).

180

Samples from 20 homes from Bloomington, Indiana, USA (as described by Venier et al. 2016) were

181

also quantified for PCBs and OCPs in the same laboratory as the CAN and CZ samples. However,

182

these extracts were shipped to CZ for analysis and they suffered significant losses during transport.

183

Therefore, these results are considered only qualitative, and are described in the SI for the purpose of

184

comparison with the CAN and CZ indoor levels.

185

QA/QC

186

Sample recoveries were monitored for individual samples and averaged 80±10% for PCB 30 in air,

187

96±8% for PCB 185 in air, 87±11% for PCB 30 in dust, and 99±19% for PCB 185 in dust. Masses for

188

each compound were individually adjusted based on the recovery of the closest surrogate eluting in

189

the same fraction in an individual sample. Further information on recovery correction is given in the

190

SI.

191

Solvent blanks were used to check for laboratory contamination. Three field blanks for each matrix

192

per country were collected. Field blank averages and standard deviations are given in Tables S5-S8.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

168

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Masses of target compounds in each sample were then compared to average masses in field blanks

194

and treated as follows: if the blank average was <10 % of the amount in sample, no correction was

195

used. If the blank average was 10-35 % of the amount in sample, the blank level was subtracted. If the

196

blank average was >35 % of the amount in sample, the sample value was reported as below the limit

197

of detection (LOD).

198

For statistical analysis, all values below the limit of detection (LOD) were substituted with

199

(√2/2)*MDL (method detection limit). For the compounds present in field blanks, MDL was

200

calculated as average level in field blanks plus three times the standard deviation. For compounds not

201

found in field blanks, the instrumental detection limit was used, calculated as the amount giving a

202

signal with signal to noise ratio equal to 3 (Table S9).

203

Since concentrations were log-normally distributed they were log-transformed for all statistical

204

analyses. Statistical analyses and graphing was done using STATISTICA version 13 and Microsoft

205

Excel 2010 software.

206

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

M AN U

TE D

207

Table 1: Summary statistics for PCBs and OCPs in air and dust by country. n is the number of samples >LOD. SE indicates standard error of the mean. The ANOVA column identifies concentrations that were significantly different from one another at p<0.05 based on ANOVA results for comparison between countries calculated on logtransformed data. Data denoted by “a” were significantly higher than data denoted by “b”. Data for individual compounds are given in Tables S10-11.

EP

208 209 210 211 212

SC

RI PT

193

Dust (ng/g)

213 9

AC C

Air (pg/m3)

Canada

Σ7PCBs PeCB HCB HCHs DDX Σ7PCBs PeCB HCB HCHs DDX

Mean±SE Median

Range

734±162 455 222±56.3 113 376±23.7 363 514±105 274 329±79.3 99.6 69.1±39.4
109 - 5110 37.8 - 1800 160 - 767 64.1 - 2180 41.4 - 1550
Czech Republic n ANOVA Mean±SE Median 34 34 34 34 34 16 0 0 25 20

a a b b b b b a

Range

661±146 467 139 - 4230 103±11.3 87.1 52 - 314 768±61.3 711 294 - 1530 1500±359 746 206 - 7820 763±222 363 48 - 5650 79.3±20.8 75.1 11.4 - 358 1.2
n ANOVA 28 28 28 28 28 28 1 0 22 30

a b a a a a a a

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

214 215 216 217

Figure 1 Boxplots of ∑7PCBs, HCHs, and DDX in air and dust in each country. The horizontal line shows the median, boxes are 25% and 75% percentiles, and whiskers are minimum and maximum without outliers. The same letters (ab) indicate no significant difference in ANOVA, using Tukey post-hoc test (p<0.05).

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 218 219

PCBs

220

respectively (Table 1). Concentrations of ∑7PCBs in CAN and CZ samples were significantly

221

(p=0.0252) lower than those in USA samples from the same study (Table S14). After correcting for

222

the number of congeners reported, levels found in this study were comparable with those reported in

223

other European (Bohlin et al., 2008; Harrad et al., 2006) and Canadian (Zhang et al., 2011) homes

224

(medians 160 – 1800 pg/m3), and higher than those found in Mexico (Bohlin et al., 2008) and

225

Vietnam (Tue et al., 2013) (medians 46 and 57 pg/m3) (see Table S15). However, these concentrations

226

were significantly lower than those in buildings with PCB-containing sealants (Frederiksen et al.,

227

2012; Herrick et al., 2016; Marek et al., 2017). It is likely that indoor levels reported here came from

228

building materials such as caulking, cable insulation, capacitors, paints and varnishes, light ballasts

229

and/or other primary uses (ATSDR, 2000), or from contaminated outdoor areas. Moreover, the

230

similarity to reported concentrations measured over the past 15 years suggests that indoor levels of

231

PCBs have remained relatively consistent over this time period, with the differences controlled by

232

such sources (e.g., building sealants) rather than temporal changes caused by fate processes (e.g.,

233

ventilation, degradation reactions).

234

The indoor air concentrations of ∑7PCBs in CZ (median of 467 pg/m3, range 139-4230) were 3-10

235

times higher than outdoor air concentrations measured by the MONET passive sampling network,

236

which recorded median concentrations of 29-175 pg/m3 for sites in the same region (Table S17,

237

Borůvková et al., 2015). Similarly, indoor air concentrations of ∑7PCBs in CAN (median 455 pg/m3,

238

range 109-5110 pg/m3) were 10 times higher than ∑7PCBs in outdoor air concentrations measured in

239

the same region by the GAPS passive sampling network (Table S18, Borůvková et al., 2015). The

240

higher indoor concentrations indicate a significant contribution of indoor sources of PCBs, rather than

241

outdoor to indoor transport from external primary and secondary sources.

242

PCB congener patterns differed between countries. Lower chlorinated congeners (PCB 28 and 52)

243

generally dominated the air samples, consistent with their higher vapour pressures. However, while

244

CAN samples contained on average 80% of PCB 28 and 52, CZ samples contained a higher fraction 11

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

PCBs were detected in all air samples, with ∑7PCB medians of 455 and 467 pg/m3 in CAN and CZ,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (~50%) of penta- to hepta- congeners, mainly PCB 101 and 153 (Figure 2). These congener profiles

246

were consistent with what has previously been observed in homes in CAN (Harrad et al., 2009) and

247

CZ (Melymuk et al., 2016a).

248

The differences in congener profiles between CAN and CZ may be related to the PCB technical

249

mixtures that were in use in the two countries. PCBs used in North America were generally Aroclor

250

mixtures produced by Monsanto Corporation (Frame et al., 1996), while those used in Czech Republic

251

were Delor technical mixtures manufactured by Chemko Stražské in eastern Slovakia (Taniyasu et al.,

252

2003). North American building sealants are believed to have contained highly chlorinated Aroclors,

253

in particular 1248, 1254 and 1260 (Erickson and Kaley, 2011; Kohler et al., 2005; Robson et al.,

254

2010), which are dominated by penta-, hexa- and hepta- congeners (Frame et al., 1996), while other

255

PCB-containing building materials and products were predominantly formed from the lighter PCB

256

technical mixtures (e.g., Aroclors 1016, 1221-1254; Erickson and Kaley, 2011). In CZ, Delor

257

mixtures spanned similar ranges of chlorination to the Aroclor mixtures, but the mixture used for

258

paints, varnishes and adhesives, Delor 106, was dominated by the hexa- and hepta- congeners

259

(Holoubek et al., 2006; Taniyasu et al., 2003). The composition of indoor air in Czech homes has

260

been found to be similar to this technical mixture (Melymuk et al., 2016a). We hypothesize that the

261

difference in the PCB congener composition between CAN and CZ indoor air is related to differences

262

(i.e., lighter congeners in CAN than CZ) in the PCB technical mixtures used in indoor applications

263

(paints, sealants, adhesives, varnishes), and differences according to PCB manufacturer.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

245

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 100% PCB 180

80%

PCB 153 60%

PCB 138 PCB 118

RI PT

40% PCB 101 PCB 52

20% 0% CAN

CZ

264

SC

PCB 28

Figure 2: Average composition of PCB congeners in air samples

266

In dust, PCBs were found in 45% of CAN samples (median
267

median of 75.1 ng/g (Table 1). Levels were similar to those reported in homes from Romania, UK,

268

USA and Canada (Dirtu et al., 2012; Harrad et al., 2009) and higher than those found in rural homes

269

in Pakistan (Ali et al., 2012) (see Table S16). Because low molecular weight PCBs were generally

270

below detection in dust, it was not possible to evaluate the differences in congener profiles in dust.

271

The difference between levels in dust are consistent with the different PCB mixtures used between

272

CAN and CZ, as noted above.

273

Since new uses of PCBs in Canada and Czech Republic were prohibited in 1977 and 1984,

274

respectively, we hypothesized that indoor PCB concentrations are related to building age. This

275

relationship has previously been observed in Czech homes (Melymuk et al. 2016) and North

276

American residences (Colt et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2011). In our study, roughly half of CAN

277

sampled homes were built after the country-specific PCB regulations on new uses and therefore

278

should not contain any PCB-containing materials. In case of CZ, only 4 of the 20 homes were built

279

after the 1984 PCB regulations. As expected, Σ7PCB air and dust concentrations were lower in post-

280

than in pre-PCB regulation homes (Figure 3), with the difference for air being significant (Mann-

281

Whitney U Test, p=0.006 for CAN, p=0.020 for CZ). The qualitative measurements in USA homes

282

also show this relationship, with an even greater difference between pre-1977 and post-1977 home

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

265

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT indoor air concentrations (p<0.001 for USA homes). The lack of significance between dust

284

concentrations may have been due to the more heterogeneous nature of the dust matrix and more

285

limited detection due to differences in the PCB mixtures used. Differences according to building age

286

suggest, as with the congener profiles, that building materials are a major contributor to the indoor

287

levels, and that these primary sources (paints, caulking, wiring, etc.) remain in place leading to long-

288

term residential contamination by PCBs. It is also interesting to note the presence of PCBs in

289

buildings constructed after regulations were passed and hence when no PCB-containing materials

290

should have been used, indicating the ubiquity of these persistent compounds.

SC

RI PT

283

M AN U

7 6 5

2 1 0

AC C

-1

5 4

2 1 0 -1

-2

-2

-3

-3

Air

292 293 294 295 296

6

3

TE D

3

EP

ln c(Σ7PCB) [pg/m3]

4

7

ln c(Σ7PCB) [ng/g]

291

CAN pre-ban CAN post-ban CZ pre-ban CZ post-ban

Dust Matrix

Figure 3 Boxplots of Σ7PCB in air and dust in homes built pre- and post PCB bans on new (but not existing) uses. The horizontal line shows the median, boxes show 25% and 75% percentiles, whiskers are maximum and minimum without outliers. The relevant years for determining whether a house was built post-ban were 1977 (CAN) and 1984 (CZ).

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 297 298

DDT

299

medians of 99.6 pg/m3 in CAN, while in CZ they were higher than Σ7PCB, with a median of 363

300

pg/m3. Concentrations of both DDX and individual compounds were significantly higher in CZ than

301

in CAN (p=0.0144) (Table 1, Figure 1), with the exception of p,p’-DDT (see Table S10). Few studies

302

have reported indoor air concentrations of DDX compounds; the concentrations of DDX compounds

303

in CAN were close to those found in homes from the UK, while those in CZ were comparable to the

304

levels reported in Sweden and USA from 1996-1998, nearly 15-20 years earlier than our sampling

305

campaign (Bohlin et al., 2008; Leone et al., 2000; see Table S15). p,p’-DDE was the dominant

306

congener and the p,p’-DDE/p,p’-DDT ratio was >3 in most samples, indicative of old DDT

307

contamination (e.g. Bohlin et al., 2008). The ratio of o,p’-DDT/(o,p’-DDT+p,p’-DDT) was generally

308

0.5-0.6 (Table S10), which may suggest a contribution of dicofol as a source of DDT, as o,p’-DDT

309

exists as an impurity in dicofol (Venier and Hites, 2014).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

DDX air concentrations in North American homes were generally lower than Σ7PCB, with DDX

ΣDDX

1

-1

1950

CAN CZ

2000

EP

1900

AC C

ln CAIR [pg/m3]

0

TE D

2

-2

-3

CAN ln C = -0.018*(Yr)+33.8 r2 = 0.41

-4

310 311

CZ ln C = -0.028*(Yr)+54.2 r2 = 0.62

Figure 4: Relationship between building construction age and indoor air concentration of ΣDDX.

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Median indoor air concentrations of DDX compounds (363 pg/m3 in CZ and 99.6 pg/m3 in CAN)

313

were consistently higher by 4-100 times than the outdoor concentrations in the same regions (Table

314

S17 and S18; outdoor median 88.6 pg/m3 in CZ and 2.05 pg/m3 in CAN). Concentrations of DDX also

315

had a significant relationship with building age (Figure 4). This suggests, as for PCBs, that the indoor

316

concentrations of DDX compounds are due to past use of DDT inside buildings, e.g., use of building

317

materials treated with DDT during construction or renovation, or application of DDT inside homes for

318

pest control. These sources appear to sustain higher concentrations in older buildings. The higher

319

median concentrations in CZ compared to CAN may be influenced by the higher amount of homes

320

sampled in CZ from the time of DDT use (Table S1); the median construction year of sampled homes

321

was 1972 in CZ and 1986 in CAN, which reflects the average ages of the housing stock in each

322

country (average 1970 in CZ and between 1984 and 1995 in CAN) (Ministry of Regional

323

Development of the CR, 2016; Natural Resources Canada, 2017). In both countries, as with the PCBs,

324

DDX was found at low levels in buildings constructed after use was regulated.

325

In dust, DDX median concentrations were 45.8 and 41.5 ng/g in CAN and CZ, respectively (Table 1).

326

Despite differences in DDX in air between countries, the differences between countries in dust were

327

not significant, suggesting that the heterogeneous nature of indoor dust is greater than country

328

differences. Our results were comparable with those reported previously for indoor dust in Denmark

329

(Bräuner et al., 2011) and Pakistan (Ali et al., 2012), but lower than those from Eastern Romania

330

(Dirtu et al., 2012) (see Table S16).

331 332

HCHs

333

was significantly higher than the median of 274 pg/m3 in CAN (Figure 1, Table 1). HCH

334

concentrations in CAN were comparable with those reported in UK homes (Bohlin et al., 2008) and

335

higher than those found in Swedish or Mexican homes (Bohlin et al., 2008). As with PCBs and DDX,

336

HCHs in indoor air were significantly higher by more than 10-fold than outdoor concentrations in the

337

same regions; median outdoor air concentrations were 50.0 pg/m3 in CZ and 12.7 pg/m3 in CAN

338

(Tables S17 and S18). 16

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

312

HCHs were found in air at similar concentrations to PCBs, with a median of 746 pg/m3 in CZ, which

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Over ~84% of HCHs consisted of γ-HCH. Both γ-HCH and α-HCH were much higher in CZ

340

(p=0.003 and p<0.001 respectively) than in CAN, which may reflect the differences in CZ and CAN

341

housing stock age, as noted for DDT. Unlike γ- and α-HCH, which were detected in all air samples, ß-

342

HCH was detected in 68% of samples, and its levels were not significantly different between two

343

countries (p=0.267). α-HCH and γ-HCH isomers were strongly correlated in CZ homes (Pearson’s r =

344

0.59 and 0.80, respectively), but no correlation was found in CAN samples. This could indicate

345

different sources in CAN homes or reflect more newer homes in CAN than CZ, as the γ-HCH/(α-

346

HCH+γ-HCH) ratio was above 0.7 in all CZ samples, but lower than 0.6 in several CAN homes

347

(Table S10). In air, γ-HCH is resistant to photodegradation and, although hypothesized, isomerization

348

of γ-HCH to α-HCH in outdoor air has not yet been proved (Walker et al., 1999). The more plausible

349

explanation for the lower ratio of γ-HCH/(α-HCH/γ-HCH) is possible past combined usage of both

350

lindane and the technical HCH mixture which contains 55 – 80 % of α-HCH compared to γ-HCH (8 –

351

15 %).

352

HCHs in indoor dust were previously reported in only a few studies. CAN concentrations were

353

comparable with those reported in Singapore (Tan et al., 2007) and Pakistan (Ali et al., 2012),

354

whereas CZ levels were higher than in Singapore and Pakistan, but lower than concentrations found in

355

indoor dust in Romania (Dirtu et al., 2012).

356

Chlorobenzenes

357

Levels and geographic patterns of HCB were similar to those of HCHs, with a median air

358

concentration of 711 pg/m3 in CZ, significantly higher than the median concentration of 363 pg/m3 in

359

CAN (Figure 1 and Table 1). Air concentrations of PeCB were significantly lower in CZ, with a

360

median of 87.1 pg/m3, compared with 113 pg/m3 in CAN. PeCB concentrations correlated well with

361

HCB (Pearson’s r = 0.59 and 0.73 in CZ and CAN, respectively). PeCB has multiple past and present

362

sources: it was used independently as a fungicide and flame retardant; existed as an impurity in HCB

363

and other pesticides; it is also a degradation product of HCB; was part of a chlorobenzene mixture

364

used to reduce viscosity of PCB products; and is produced unintentionally during combustion and

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

339

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT industrial processes (Environment Canada, 2005; Stockholm Convention, 2009). The correlation

366

between HCB and PeCB suggests that HCB related sources of PeCB are dominant contributors to

367

indoor levels of PeCB in CAN and CZ.

368

Few studies have reported levels of HCB in indoor air. CAN results were similar to concentrations

369

reported for UK (Bohlin et al., 2008) and France (Laborie et al., 2016), while higher than levels in

370

Sweden and Mexico (Bohlin et al., 2008). One CZ sample contained, to our knowledge, the highest

371

concentration of HCB reported in residential air (1.5 ng/m3).

372

Nearly all dust samples were below detection limits for HCB and PeCB, which is not surprising given

373

their relatively high vapour pressures.

374

Correlation between air and dust concentrations

375

Air and dust concentrations were compared to provide insights into their equilibrium status and hence

376

relative age of these chemicals indoors. This was accomplished by estimating the equilibrium gas-

377

phase air concentration using measured dust concentrations, and comparing with the measured air

378

concentrations (Figure 5). Although PUF-PAS are known to sample bulk (gas+particle) air indoors

379

(Bohlin et al., 2014), here target PCBs and OCPs were largely expected to be in the gas-phase at

380

indoor temperatures. As such, air concentrations obtained from the PUF-PAS were assumed to

381

represent gas-phase air concentrations. Gas-phase air concentrations were estimated using the

382

methods described in Melymuk et al. (2016b), and previously applied by Venier et al. (2016) and

383

Vykoukalová et al. (2017). Details are also given in the SI.

384

Measured air concentrations correlated well with air concentrations estimated from dust for all

385

compounds with detection in >15 samples, except for PCB 180 (Table S20). Spearman correlation

386

coefficients were between 0.34 and 0.76, p<0.05.

387

In general, estimated air concentrations were within one order of magnitude of measured

388

concentrations, as indicated by slopes between 0.22 and 1.1 for the linear regression of estimated vs.

389

measured air concentrations, consistent with equilibrium between air and dust. This suggests stable

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

365

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT indoor conditions and hence no rapid changes in either primary or secondary sources, as would be

391

expected for legacy compounds such as PCBs and OCPs. This contrasts with what is seen with

392

compounds for which primary sources change rapidly over time and for higher molecular weight

393

compounds such as halogenated flame retardants with logKOA >11. High values of logKOA bring a

394

kinetic limitation on air-dust exchange, due to the length of time required to reach equilibrium vs.

395

time scales imposed by air exchange rates relative to volatilization from primary sources in indoor

396

environments (Venier et al., 2016; Weschler and Nazaroff, 2010; Zhang et al., 2011). (b)

0.1

0.01

0.001 0.001

0.01

0.1

1

3

Measured air conc. (pg/m )

TE D

PCB 138: Spearman r: 0.45 (p = 0.03) Slope: 0.45 397

10

SC

Predicted air conc. (pg/m3)

1

1

0.1

M AN U

Predicted air conc. (pg/m3)

(a)

RI PT

390

0.01

0.001

0.0001 0.01

0.1

1

10 3

Measured air conc. (pg/m )

p,p‘-DDT: Spearman r: 0.73 (p < 0.0001) Slope: 0.92

Figure 5 Relationship between estimated and measured air concentrations for (a) PCB 138 and (b) p,p’-DDT. The line indicates a 1:1 relationship between estimated and measured concentrations, and Spearman r is given for correlation between estimated and measured air.

401 402

Implications for human exposure

403

compared with dietary exposure to evaluate the relative importance of indoor environments as a

404

source of human exposure. Equivalent dietary exposure information was not available for Canada.

405

Details of all input variables, equations and assumptions used to estimate exposure are given in Table

406

S21. Under typical exposure scenarios (i.e., median levels in air and dust and average

407

inhalation/ingestion ratios) exposure to Σ7PCBs, HCHs and DDX via indoor pathways was small,

408

representing <5% of total exposure, or up to 10-17% for HCB. However, under high exposure

409

scenarios experienced by those living in the highest level indoor environments and with 95th

EP

398 399 400

AC C

Indoor exposure via inhalation and dust ingestion was estimated for Czech adults and toddlers, and

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 410

percentile intake rates, the contribution could be significant, accounting for 20-60% of total exposure

411

to DDX, PCBs and HCHs.

412 413

Comparison of legacy and current-use SVOCs

414

diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), “novel” halogenated flame retardants (NFRs) in air and dust (Venier et al.,

415

2016), organophosphate ester flame retardants (OPEs) in air and dust (Vykoukalová et al., 2017), and

416

perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in dust (Karásková et al., 2016). This gave us the opportunity

417

to examine the differences between levels of legacy pollutants for which new uses ceased decades ago

418

with those still in use or only recently banned from new use and production.

(a)

(b) 100000

M AN U Dust concentration (ng/g)

10000

1000

100

10

1

423

NFRs

10000

PFCs OCPs PCBs

1000

OPEs

100

10

1 CAN

CZ

Figure 6 Medians of legacy and current-use SVOCs in (a) air, and (b) dust, by country. Data for PBDEs and NFRs are from Venier et al. (2016), PFASs are from Karásková et al. (2016) and OPEs from Vykoukalová et al. (2017). PFASs in air are not available.

EP

420 421 422

CZ

PBDEs

AC C

419

CAN

TE D

Air concentration (pg/m3)

100000

SC

RI PT

Samples used in this study were also analyzed for current-use SVOCs, including polybrominated

424

OPEs had the highest concentrations in both countries and matrices by orders of magnitude (Figure

425

6). This finding points to high usage of OPEs in consumer products and building materials where they

426

are typically added at percentage levels that exceed that of brominated flame retardants (e.g.,

427

Stapleton et al., 2009). However, the air concentrations of the legacy PCBs and OCPs were second to

428

those of OPEs (although two orders of magnitude less), and notably about one order of magnitude

429

higher than the other currently or more recently used compounds (PBDEs, NFRs; Figure 6a), as has

430

been noted previously in the UK (Harrad et al., 2006), Japan (Takigami et al., 2009), and Canada 20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Zhang et al., 2011). PBDEs and NFRs were up to two orders of magnitude higher than PCBs and

432

OCPs in dust in CAN, or comparable in CZ (Figure 6b). The PFAS median was similar to those of

433

PCBs and OCPs in both countries.

434

These patterns raise three points. First, higher dust than air concentrations of “newer” PBDEs and

435

NFRs reflects a move towards the use of lower vapour pressure compounds, presumably intended to

436

avoid the high mobility of legacy POPs conferred by their higher vapour pressures (Wania, 2003).

437

However, considering human exposure, this may reflect merely a shift in the primary exposure

438

pathways from inhalation to dust ingestion, a pathway which is particularly relevant for young

439

children (Jones-Otazo et al., 2005; Larsson et al., 2018; Malliari and Kalantzi, 2017).

440

Second, the elevated concentrations of legacy POPs indoors clearly demonstrates their environmental

441

persistence. The elevated levels in indoor air compared to outdoor air strongly support the influence

442

of ongoing primary sources of POPs indoors, decades after restrictions, in building materials (for

443

PCBs), or due to intentional use and incorporation into building materials (for pesticides). We see that

444

building ventilation and dust cleaning have limited ability to clear these chemicals from indoor

445

environments. Moreover, differences in the typical age of the housing stock between countries, e.g.,

446

older homes in CZ, are associated with differences in levels of legacy POPs which could lead to

447

regional differences in residential exposure.

448

Third, these levels shed light on the difficult task of effective chemical management. It is sobering to

449

consider the effectiveness of chemical regulations: nearly 15 years after international controls were

450

implemented through the Stockholm Convention and 40 years after PCBs were first regulated at

451

national levels, the “Dirty Dozen” continue to be found at elevated levels in indoor environments.

452

Higher levels of PCBs in homes built prior to the initial regulations, and continuing exposure to these

453

PCBs, demonstrate the difficulty in enacting regulations that provide for population-wide safety.

454

These results emphasize that regulation of new uses does not mean that the chemical is banned, which

455

gives the impression of “gone”.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

431

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

CONCLUSIONS

457

PCBs and OCPs were consistently detected in indoor air and dust in homes from Canada and Czech

458

Republic at levels comparable to those reported in similar environments over the past 15 years. Some

459

country-specific differences were discernable from past usage patterns, such as the congener profiles

460

of PCBs between Canada and the Czech Republic, and higher indoor concentrations of DDX and

461

HCH in CZ. Relationships between indoor air concentrations and building age showed higher levels

462

in older buildings and support the hypothesis of continuing active primary indoor sources of legacy

463

POPs as an important contributor to indoor levels. It is also important to note the presence of legacy

464

compounds in buildings constructed after regulations were enacted. Indoor air concentrations were, on

465

average, 10 times higher than those outdoors, suggesting on-going opportunities for human exposure.

466

Decades after national and international restrictions on new uses, air concentrations of PCBs and

467

OCPs remain stubbornly consistent, reflecting their persistence indoors, the importance of both

468

primary and secondary sources, and the challenges faced in managing chemicals after they have been

469

used widely.

470

Acknowledgments

471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478

This work was supported by the Czech-American Scientific Cooperation Program (AMVIS/KONTAKT II, LH12074). RECETOX research infrastructure was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (LM2015051) and the European Structural and Investment Funds (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001761). Support in Canada was provided by Allergy, Genes and Environment Network (AllerGenNCE) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). We thank Joseph Okeme and Amandeep Saini (University of Toronto) for collecting samples in Canada. We also thank all volunteers in Bloomington (IN, USA), Toronto (Canada) and Brno (Czech Republic) for their participation.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

456

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

REFERENCES

480 481

Abb, M., Breuer, J. V., Zeitz, C., Lorenz, W., 2010. Analysis of pesticides and PCBs in waste wood and house dust. Chemosphere 81, 488–493.

482 483 484

Ali, N., Van Den Eede, N., Dirtu, A.C., Neels, H., Covaci, A., 2012. Assessment of human exposure to indoor organic contaminants via dust ingestion in Pakistan. Indoor Air 22, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00757.x

485 486 487

Ampleman, M.D., Martinez, A., DeWall, J., Rawn, D.F.K., Hornbuckle, K.C., Thorne, P.S., 2015. Inhalation and dietary exposure to PCBs in urban and rural cohorts via congener-specific measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5048039

488 489

ATSDR, 2000. Toxicological profile for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp17.pdf

490 491

Bailey, R.E., van Wijk, D., Thomas, P.C., 2009. Sources and prevalence of pentachlorobenzene in the environment. Chemosphere 75, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.038

492 493 494 495

Bennett, D.H., Moran, R.E., Wu, X., Tulve, N.S., Clifton, M.S., Colón, M., Weathers, W., Sjödin, A., Jones, R., Hertz-Picciotto, I., 2014. Polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) concentrations and resulting exposure in homes in California: Relationships among passive air, surface wipe and dust concentrations, and temporal variability. Indoor Air 25, 220–229.

496 497 498

Blanchard, O., Glorennec, P., Mercier, F., Bonvallot, N., Chevrier, C., Ramalho, O., Mandin, C., Bot, B. Le, 2014. Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor air and settled dust in 30 French dwellings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 3959–3969. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405269q

499 500 501 502 503

Bohlin, P., Audy, O., Škrdlíková, L., Kukučka, P., Vojta, Š., Přibylová, P., Prokeš, R., Čupr, P., Klánová, J., 2014. Evaluation and guidelines for using polyurethane foam (PUF) passive air samplers in double-dome chambers to assess semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in nonindustrial indoor environments. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 16, 2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00305E

504 505 506

Bohlin, P., Jones, K.C., Tovalin, H., Strandberg, B., 2008. Observations on persistent organic pollutants in indoor and outdoor air using passive polyurethane foam samplers. Atmos. Environ. 42, 7234–7241.

507 508 509

Booij, P., Holoubek, I., Klánová, J., Kohoutek, J., Dvorská, A., Magulová, K., Al-Zadjali, S., Čupr, P., 2016. Current implications of past DDT indoor spraying in Oman. Sci. Total Environ. 550, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.044

510 511 512 513

Borůvková, J., Gregor, J., Šebková, K., Bednářová, Z., Kalina, J., Hůlek, R., Dušek, L., Holoubek, I., Klánová, J., 2015. GENASIS – Global Environmental Assessment and Information System [online] [WWW Document]. Masaryk. univerzita, 2015 [cit. 2017-06-19]. Available http//www.genasis.cz. Verze 2.0. ISSN 1805-3181.

514 515

Bräuner, E.V., Mayer, P., Gunnarsen, L., Vorkamp, K., Raaschou-Nielsen, O., 2011. Occurrence of organochlorine pesticides in indoor dust. J. Environ. Monit. 13, 522–6.

516 517

Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 2015. PCB Regulations [WWW Document]. Canada Gaz. Part II. URL http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2008-273/

518 519 520

Colt, J.S., Severson, R.K., Lubin, J., Rothman, N., Camann, D., Davis, S., Cerhan, J.R., Cozen, W., Hartge, P., 2005. Organochlorines in Carpet Dust and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Epidemiology 16, 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000164811.25760.f1

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

479

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Diamond, M.L., 2017. Toxic chemicals as enablers and poisoners of the technosphere. Anthr. Rev. 4, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019617726308

523 524 525

Diamond, M.L., Melymuk, L., Csiszar, S.A., Robson, M., 2010. Estimation of PCB stocks, emissions, and urban fate: will our policies reduce concentrations and exposure? Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2777–83.

526 527 528

Dirtu, A.C., Ali, N., Van den Eede, N., Neels, H., Covaci, A., 2012. Country specific comparison for profile of chlorinated, brominated and phosphate organic contaminants in indoor dust. Case study for Eastern Romania, 2010. Environ. Int. 49, 1–8.

529 530 531

Environment Canada, 2017. Toxic substances list: hexachlorobenzene [WWW Document]. URL https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/management-toxicsubstances/list-canadian-environmental-protection-act/hexachlorobenzene.html

532 533 534

Environment Canada, 2013a. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [WWW Document]. URL https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/management-toxicsubstances/list-canadian-environmental-protection-act/dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.html

535 536 537 538 539

Environment Canada, 2013b. Update to Canada’s National Implementation Plan under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants: Chapter 3 – Measures to Reduce or Eliminate Releases from Intentional Production and Use, Import and Export [WWW Document]. URL http://ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=En&n=FDB6031D-1&xml=FDB6031D-2DC9-48898B32-22E4B09C8FE5&offset=4&toc=show

540 541 542

Environment Canada, 2005. Pentachlorobenzene (QCB) and tetrachlorobenzenes (TeCBs) proposed risk management strategy [WWW Document]. URL http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/ec/En40-680-2005-eng.pdf

543 544

Erickson, M.D., Kaley, R.G., 2011. Applications of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 18, 135–51.

545 546 547

Frame, G.M., Cochran, J.W., Bøwadt, S.S., 1996. Complete PCB congener distributions for 17 aroclor mixtures determined by 3 HRGC systems optimized for comprehensive, quantitative, congener-specific analysis. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 19, 657–668.

548 549 550

Frederiksen, M., Meyer, H.W., Ebbehøj, N.E., Gunnarsen, L., 2012. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in indoor air originating from sealants in contaminated and uncontaminated apartments within the same housing estate. Chemosphere 89, 473–9.

551 552 553

Harrad, S.J., Hazrati, S., Ibarra, C., 2006. Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls in indoor air and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor air and dust in Birmingham, United Kingdom: implications for human exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4633–8.

554 555 556 557

Harrad, S.J., Ibarra, C., Robson, M., Melymuk, L., Zhang, X., Diamond, M.L., Douwes, J., 2009. Polychlorinated biphenyls in domestic dust from Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States: Implications for human exposure. Chemosphere 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.020

558 559 560

Hazrati, S., Harrad, S.J., 2007. Calibration of polyurethane foam (PUF) disk passive air samplers for quantitative measurement of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs): factors influencing sampling rates. Chemosphere 67, 448–55.

561 562

Health Canada, 2009. Lindane Risk Assessment [WWW Document]. URL http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/arla-pmra/H113-5-2009-8-eng.pdf

563

Herkert, N.J., Jahnke, J.C., Hornbuckle, K.C., 2018. Emissions of Tetrachlorobiphenyls (PCBs 47, 51, 24

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

521 522

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and 68) from Polymer Resin on Kitchen Cabinets as a Non-Aroclor Source to Residential Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00966

564 565

Herrick, R.F., Stewart, J.H., Allen, J.G., 2016. Review of PCBs in US schools: a brief history, an estimate of the number of impacted schools, and an approach for evaluating indoor air samples. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 1975–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4574-8

569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577

Holoubek, I., Adamec, V., Bartoš, M., Bláha, K., Bláha, L., Budňáková, M., Černa, M., Čupr, P., Demnerová, K., Drápal, J., Hajšlová, J., Hanzálková, M., Holoubková, I., Hrabětová, S., Jech, L., Klánová, J., Kohoutek, J., Kužílek, V., Machálek, P., Matějů, V., Matoušek, J., Matoušek, M., Mestřík, V., Novák, J., Ocelka, T., Pekárek, V., Petrlík, J., Petira, O., Provazník, K., Punčochář, M., Rieder, M., Ruprich, J., Sáňka, M., Tomaniová, M., Vácha, R., Volka, K., Zbíral, J., 2006. The National Implementation Plan for Implementation of the Stockholm Convention in the Czech Republic [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/Implementation/NationalImplementationPlans/NIPTransmission/tabid/253/D efault.aspx

578 579 580

Holt, E., Audy, O., Booij, P., Melymuk, L., Prokeš, R., Klánová, J., 2017. Organochlorine pesticides in the indoor air of a theatre and museum in the Czech Republic: Inhalation exposure and cancer risk. Sci. Total Environ. 609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.203

581 582

Hu, D., Hornbuckle, K.C., 2010. Inadvertent polychlorinated biphenyls in commercial paint pigments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2822–7.

583 584 585 586

Jones-Otazo, H.A., Clarke, J.P., Diamond, M.L., Archbold, J.A., Ferguson, G., Harner, T., Richardson, G.M., Ryan, J.J., Wilford, B.H., 2005. Is house dust the missing exposure pathway for PBDEs? An analysis of the urban fate and human exposure to PBDEs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 5121–5130.

587 588 589

Karásková, P., Venier, M., Melymuk, L., Bečanová, J., Vojta, Š., Prokeš, R., Diamond, M.L., Klánová, J., 2016. Perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in household dust in Central Europe and North America. Environ. Int. 94, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.031

590 591 592 593

Klepeis, N.E., Nelson, W.C., Ott, W.R., Robinson, J.P., Tsang, a M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V, Hern, S.C., Engelmann, W.H., 2001. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 11, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165

594 595 596

Kohler, M., Tremp, J., Zennegg, M., Seiler, C., Minder-Kohler, S., Beck, M., Lienemann, P., Wegmann, L., Schmid, P., 2005. Joint sealants: an overlooked diffuse source of polychlorinated biphenyls in buildings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 1967–73.

597 598 599

Laborie, S., Moreau-Guigon, E., Alliot, F., Desportes, A., Oziol, L., Chevreuil, M., 2016. A new analytical protocol for the determination of 62 endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air. Talanta 147, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.028

600 601 602

Larsson, K., de Wit, C.A., Sellström, U., Sahlström, L., Lindh, C.H., Berglund, M., 2018. Brominated flame retardants and organophosphate esters in preschool dust and children’s hand wipes. Environ. Sci. Technol. acs.est.8b00184. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00184

603 604 605

Leone, A.D., Ulrich, E.M., E. Bodnar, C., Falconer, R.L., Hites, R.A., 2000. Organochlorine pesticide concentrations and enantiomer fractions for chlordane in indoor air from the US cornbelt. Atmos. Environ. 34, 4131–4138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00247-8

606 607

Lyall, K., Croen, L.A., Sjödin, A., Yoshida, C.K., Zerbo, O., Kharrazi, M., Windham, G.C., 2016. Polychlorinated Biphenyl and Organochlorine Pesticide Concentrations in Maternal Mid-

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

566 567 568

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Pregnancy Serum Samples: Association with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. Environ. Health Perspect. 125. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP277

608 609

Malliari, E., Kalantzi, O.-I., 2017. Children’s exposure to brominated flame retardants in indoor environments - A review. Environ. Int. 108, 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.08.011

613 614

Marcotte, S., Estel, L., Leboucher, S., Minchin, S., 2014. Occurrence of organic biocides in the air and dust at the Natural History Museum of Rouen, France. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 68–72.

615 616 617

Marek, R.F., Thorne, P.S., Herkert, N.J., Awad, A.M., Hornbuckle, K.C., 2017. Airborne PCBs and OH-PCBs Inside and Outside Urban and Rural U.S. Schools. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 7853– 7860. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01910

618 619 620 621

Matz, C., Stieb, D., Davis, K., Egyed, M., Rose, A., Chou, B., Brion, O., 2014. Effects of Age, Season, Gender and Urban-Rural Status on Time-Activity: Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey 2 (CHAPS 2). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 2108–2124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110202108

622 623 624

Melymuk, L., Bohlin-Nizzetto, P., Kukučka, P., Vojta, Š., Kalina, J., Cupr, P., Klánová, J., Čupr, P., Klánová, J., 2016a. Seasonality and indoor/outdoor relationships of flame retardants and PCBs in residential air. Environ. Pollut. 218, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.018

625 626 627 628

Melymuk, L., Bohlin-Nizzetto, P., Vojta, Š., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Audy, O., Přibylová, P., Klánová, J., 2016b. Distribution of legacy and emerging semivolatile organic contaminants in five indoor matrices in a residential environment. Chemosphere 153, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.012

629

Ministry of Regional Development of the CR, 2016. Housing in the Czech Republic in figures.

630 631 632 633

National Centre for Toxic Compounds, 2017. Czech Republic Updated National Implementation Plan for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in the period 2012-2017 [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/Implementation/NIPs/NIPTransmission/tabid/253/Default.aspx

634 635 636 637

Natural Resources Canada, 2017. Residential Housing Stock and Floor Space - Residential End-Use Model [WWW Document]. Off. Energy Effic. URL http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/corporate/statistics/neud/dpa/showTable.cfm?type=HB§or=res&juris =00&rn=11&page=3 (accessed 4.30.18).

638 639 640 641

Nielsen, O.-K., Plejdrup, M.S., Winther, M., Nielsen, M., Fauser, P., Albrektsen, R., Mikkelsen, M.H., Hjelgaard, K., Hoffmann, L., Thomsen, M., Bruun, H.G., 2013. Danish emission inventory for hexachlorobenzene and polychlorinated biphenyls, Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 103.

642 643 644

Robson, M., Melymuk, L., Csiszar, S.A., Giang, A., Diamond, M.L., Helm, P.A., 2010. Continuing sources of PCBs: the significance of building sealants. Environ. Int. 36, 506–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.03.009

645 646 647

Rosenbaum, P.F., Weinstock, R.S., Silverstone, A.E., Sjödin, A., Pavuk, M., 2017. Metabolic syndrome is associated with exposure to organochlorine pesticides in Anniston, AL, United States. Environ. Int. 108, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.017

648 649 650

Rudel, R.A., Dodson, R.E., Perovich, L.J., Morello-Frosch, R., Camann, D.E., Zuniga, M.M., Yau, A.Y., Just, A.C., Brody, J.G., 2010. Semivolatile endocrine-disrupting compounds in paired indoor and outdoor air in two northern California communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

610 611 612

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6583–90.

651

Rudel, R.A., Seryak, L.M., Brody, J.G., 2008. PCB-containing wood floor finish is a likely source of elevated PCBs in residents’ blood, household air and dust: a case study of exposure. Environ. Heal. 7, 2.

655 656 657

Saini, A., Okeme, J.O., Goosey, E.R., Diamond, M.L., 2015. Calibration of two passive air samplers for monitoring phthalates and brominated flame-retardants in indoor air. Chemosphere 137, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.099

658 659 660

Schieweck, A., Delius, W., Siwinski, N., Vogtenrath, W., Genning, C., Salthammer, T., 2007. Occurrence of organic and inorganic biocides in the museum environment. Atmos. Environ. 41, 3266–3275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.061

661 662

Scott, G.R., Chosidow, O., 2011. European guideline for the management of scabies, 2010. Int. J. STD AIDS 22, 301–303. https://doi.org/10.1258/ijsa.2011.011112

663 664 665

Shin, H.-M., McKone, T.E., Tulve, N.S., Clifton, M.S., Bennett, D.H., 2013. Indoor residence times of semivolatile organic compounds: model estimation and field evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 859–67.

666 667 668

Stapleton, H.M., Klosterhaus, S.L., Eagle, S., Fuh, J., Meeker, J.D., Blum, A., Webster, T.F., 2009. Detection of organophosphate flame retardants in furniture foam and U.S. house dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 7490–5.

669 670 671

Stockholm Convention, 2009. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) as amended in 2009 [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/Overview/tabid/3351/Default.aspx

672 673 674

Stockholm Convention, 2008. The 12 initial POPs under the Stockholm Convention [WWW Document]. URL http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/The12InitialPOPs/tabid/296/Default.aspx

675 676 677

Takigami, H., Suzuki, G., Hirai, Y., Sakai, S., 2009. Brominated flame retardants and other polyhalogenated compounds in indoor air and dust from two houses in Japan. Chemosphere 76, 270–7.

678 679 680

Tan, J., Cheng, S.M., Loganath, A., Chong, Y.S., Obbard, J.P., 2007. Selected organochlorine pesticide and polychlorinated biphenyl residues in house dust in Singapore. Chemosphere 68, 1675–82.

681 682 683 684

Taniyasu, S., Kannan, K., Holoubek, I., Ansorgova, A., Horii, Y., Hanari, N., Yamashita, N., Aldous, K.M., 2003. Isomer-specific analysis of chlorinated biphenyls, naphthalenes and dibenzofurans in Delor: polychlorinated biphenyl preparations from the former Czechoslovakia. Environ. Pollut. 126, 169–178.

685 686 687 688

Tue, N.M., Takahashi, S., Suzuki, G., Isobe, T., Viet, P.H., Kobara, Y., Seike, N., Zhang, G., Sudaryanto, A., Tanabe, S., 2013. Contamination of indoor dust and air by polychlorinated biphenyls and brominated flame retardants and relevance of non-dietary exposure in Vietnamese informal e-waste recycling sites. Environ. Int. 51, 160–7.

689 690

Turusov, V., Rakitsky, V., Tomatis, L., 2002. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): ubiquity, persistence, and risks. Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 125–8.

691 692

US EPA, 2017. Policy and Guidance for Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCBs) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.epa.gov/pcbs/policy-and-guidance-polychlorinated-biphenyl-pcbs

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

652 653 654

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT van den Berg, H., 2009. Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, 1656–1663. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900785

696 697 698 699

Venier, M., Audy, O., Vojta, Š., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Melymuk, L., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Okeme, J.O., Saini, A., Diamond, M.L., Klánová, J., 2016. Brominated flame retardants in indoor environment - comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries. Environ. Int. 94, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029

700 701 702

Vorhees, D.J., Cullen, A.C., Altshul, L.M., 1997. Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Residential Indoor Air and Outdoor Air near a Superfund Site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 3612– 3618.

703 704 705 706

Vorkamp, K., 2016. An overlooked environmental issue? A review of the inadvertent formation of PCB-11 and other PCB congeners and their occurrence in consumer products and in the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 541, 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.019

707 708 709 710

Vykoukalová, M., Venier, M., Vojta, Š., Melymuk, L., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Prokeš, R., Okeme, J.O., Saini, A., Diamond, M.L., Klánová, J., 2017. Organophosphate esters flame retardants in the indoor environment. Environ. Int. 106, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.020

711 712 713

Walker, K., Vallero, D.A., Lewis, R.G., 1999. Factors Influencing the Distribution of Lindane and Other Hexachlorocyclohexanes in the Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 4373–4378. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990647n

714 715 716

Wania, F., 2003. Assessing the potential of persistent organic chemicals for long-range transport and accumulation in polar regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 1344–1351. https://doi.org/10.1021/es026019e

717 718

Weschler, C.J., Nazaroff, W.W., 2010. SVOC partitioning between the gas phase and settled dust indoors. Atmos. Environ. 44, 3609–3620.

719 720

WHO/IPCS, 1997. Environmental Health Criteria 195: Hexachlorobenzene [WWW Document]. URL http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc195.htm

721 722

WHO/IPCS, 1993. Environmental Health Criteria 140: Polychlorinated biphenyls and terphenyls (2nd ed.) [WWW Document]. URL http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc140.htm

723 724 725

Willett, K.L., Ulrich, E.M., Hites, R.A., 1998. Differential Toxicity and Environmental Fates of Hexachlorocyclohexane Isomers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2197–2207. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9708530

726 727 728 729

Wilson, L.R., Palmer, P.M., Belanger, E.E., Cayo, M.R., Durocher, L.A., Hwang, S.-A.A., Fitzgerald, E.F., 2011. Indoor Air Polychlorinated Biphenyl Concentrations in Three Communities Along the Upper Hudson River, New York. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 61, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9627-x

730 731

Wilson, N.K., Chuang, J.C., Lyu, C., 2001. Levels of persistent organic pollutants in several child day care centers. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 11, 449–458.

732 733 734

Zhang, X., Diamond, M.L., Robson, M., Harrad, S.J., 2011. Sources, emissions, and fate of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated biphenyls indoors in Toronto, Canada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3268–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102767g

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

693 694 695

735 28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights: PCBs and OCPs were detected air and dust from homes in Canada and Czech Rep.



Higher concentrations of pesticides were found in Czech homes



Older buildings contained higher concentrations of PCBs and DDTs



Composition of PCB congeners differs between Czech and Canadian homes



Levels of PCBs, OCPs exceed those of in-use compounds >30 years after restrictions

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT