- Email: [email protected]
Penile carcinoma
who cannot, however, intermittent catheterization should be available in any center that proposes to offer complete urologic care for the patient with spinal cord injury. Harry W. Herr, M.D. Spinal Cord Injury Center, Long Beach Veterans Hospital, Huntington Beach, California 92646
From the viewpoint of a contributor it is revolutionary! To submit an article, have it accepted, receive the galleys, and see it in print in such a short time is amazing, and rewarding. Incidentally, the section on history is, indeed, a joy and an education. I have been told by many urologists how much they enjoy this easy way to learn of urology’s past. My congratulations to you and best wishes for your continued success as editor of Urology.
References 1. HACKLER, R. II.: Spinal cord injury: urologic care, Urology 2: 13 (1973). Hydronephrosis and hydrometer in 2. DAMANSM, M.: paraplegia: a clinical study, J. Urol. 89: 660 (1963). 3. BORS, E., and COMARR, A. E.: Neurological Urology, Baltimore, University Park Press, 1971, p. 342. Upper urinary tract dilatation in para4. IRVINE, A. H.: plegia, Brit. J. Urol. 31: 47 (1959). 5. COMARR, A. E.: Intermittent catheterization for the traumatic cord bladder patient, J. Urol. 108: 79 (1972).
COMPLIMENTS To the Editor: I have very much enjoyed the first issues of Urology. I admire it, as a reader, for its fresh new outlook and its coverage of the field of urology from both the clinical and investigative views. It makes it interesting reading rather than the stoginess we too often find.
UROLOGY
/ OCTOBER 1973 / VOLUME II, NUMBER 4
John R. Herman, M.D. Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx. New York 10461
PENILE
CARCINOMA
I really enjoyed the August, 1973, issue of Urology, especially your comments on page I71 on the treatment of penile carcinoma and the need for inguinal dissection. Right on, brother! It is delightful when two different series of sufficient size, such as yours and the one from Roswell Park, have the material, at least in my opinion, to suggest a comprehensive and reasonable approach.
To the Editor:
Gerald P. Murphy, M.D., D.Sc Roswell Park Memorial Institute Buffalo, New York 14203
479
From the viewpoint of a contributor it is revolutionary! To submit an article, have it accepted, receive the galleys, and see it in print in such a short time is amazing, and rewarding. Incidentally, the section on history is, indeed, a joy and an education. I have been told by many urologists how much they enjoy this easy way to learn of urology’s past. My congratulations to you and best wishes for your continued success as editor of Urology.
References 1. HACKLER, R. II.: Spinal cord injury: urologic care, Urology 2: 13 (1973). Hydronephrosis and hydrometer in 2. DAMANSM, M.: paraplegia: a clinical study, J. Urol. 89: 660 (1963). 3. BORS, E., and COMARR, A. E.: Neurological Urology, Baltimore, University Park Press, 1971, p. 342. Upper urinary tract dilatation in para4. IRVINE, A. H.: plegia, Brit. J. Urol. 31: 47 (1959). 5. COMARR, A. E.: Intermittent catheterization for the traumatic cord bladder patient, J. Urol. 108: 79 (1972).
COMPLIMENTS To the Editor: I have very much enjoyed the first issues of Urology. I admire it, as a reader, for its fresh new outlook and its coverage of the field of urology from both the clinical and investigative views. It makes it interesting reading rather than the stoginess we too often find.
UROLOGY
/ OCTOBER 1973 / VOLUME II, NUMBER 4
John R. Herman, M.D. Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx. New York 10461
PENILE
CARCINOMA
I really enjoyed the August, 1973, issue of Urology, especially your comments on page I71 on the treatment of penile carcinoma and the need for inguinal dissection. Right on, brother! It is delightful when two different series of sufficient size, such as yours and the one from Roswell Park, have the material, at least in my opinion, to suggest a comprehensive and reasonable approach.
To the Editor:
Gerald P. Murphy, M.D., D.Sc Roswell Park Memorial Institute Buffalo, New York 14203
479