Accepted Manuscript Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Pedro Henrique Nunes Panzenhagen, Waldemir Silva Aguiar, Beatriz da Silva Frasão, Virginia Léo de Almeida Pereira, Dayse Lima da Costa Abreu, Dalia dos Prazeres Rodrigues, Elmiro Rosendo do Nascimento, Maria Helena Cosendey de Aquino PII:
S0956-7135(15)30224-3
DOI:
10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.10.002
Reference:
JFCO 4680
To appear in:
Food Control
Received Date: 12 July 2015 Revised Date:
2 October 2015
Accepted Date: 6 October 2015
Please cite this article as: Panzenhagen P.H.N., Aguiar W.S., da Silva Frasão B., de Almeida Pereira V.L., da Costa Abreu D.L., dos Prazeres Rodrigues D., do Nascimento E.R. & de Aquino M.H.C., Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Food Control (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.10.002. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and
2
Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3
Pedro Henrique Nunes Panzenhagena*, Waldemir Silva Aguiara, Beatriz da Silva Frasãoa,
4
Virginia Léo de Almeida Pereiraa, Dayse Lima da Costa Abreua, Dalia dos Prazeres
5
Rodriguesb, Elmiro Rosendo do Nascimentoa, Maria Helena Cosendey de Aquinoa
7 8 9
a
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Public Health, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), 24230-
340, 64 Vital Brazil Filho Street, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. b
National Reference Laboratory Diagnosis of Enteric Bacteria, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz
Foundation (FIOCRUZ), 21045-900, 4365 Brazil Avenue, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
SC
6
RI PT
1
* Corresponding Author at: Analytical Laboratory Center, Department of Food Technology, Faculty of
11
Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University, 64, Vital Brazil Filho, Niterói - Rio de Janeiro - Brazil Zip Code:
12
24230-340. E-mail:
[email protected] / Phone: +55-21-99567-9533 / +55-21-2268-5367
M AN U
10
13 Abstract
15
To investigate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in poultry carcasses in state of Rio de
16
Janeiro, Brazil, 60 samples from 6 slaughterhouses were collected over a period of 6 months. A total
17
of 82 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from twenty seven (45%) positive chicken carcasses,
18
including 44 isolates (53.66%) of Campylobacter jejuni and 38 (46.34%) of Campylobacter coli. The
19
identification of all strains was confirmed by PCR. Salmonella was isolated from 4 (6.67%) carcasses
20
by conventional method and was detected in 5 (8.33%) of 60 chicken carcasses by PCR. Two
21
Salmonella Albany and two Salmonella Typhimurium were identified. Antimicrobial susceptibility
22
testing was primarily done by the disk diffusion method and later by assessing minimum inhibitory
23
concentrations (MICs) against all the isolates. All the Campylobacter isolates were resistant to
24
ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin. It was observed high MIC values for enrofloxacin (64 µg/mL) in one
25
C. jejuni and two C. coli strains, and for ciprofloxacin (≥ 128 µg/mL) in one C. jejuni and three C.
26
coli strains. No Salmonella isolate was resistant to these antibiotics by both methods. These findings
27
reveal a broad extent of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter isolates from chicken carcasses
28
in Brazil and underline the need for prudent use of these antibiotics in poultry production to minimize
29
the spread of fluoroquinolone resistant Campylobacter.
30
Keywords: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Enrofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Chicken carcasses, Brazil
AC C
EP
TE D
14
31 32
1. Introduction
33
Salmonellosis and Campylobacteriosis are among the most frequently reported foodborne
34
diseases worldwide. While numerous potential vehicles of transmission exist, commercial chicken
35
meat has been identified as one of the most important food vehicles for these organisms (FAO/WHO, 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 36
2009). Although The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports Salmonella as leading
37
causes of hospitalization by foodborne illness in United States (Scallan et al., 2011), interestingly,
38
Campylobacter remains the most commonly reported gastrointestinal bacterial pathogen in humans
39
since 2005 within European Union population (EFSA, 2013). In developing countries, outbreak information is frequently incomplete because health
41
authorities lack the capabilities or resources for detection, or presumably, because diarrheal diseases
42
are highly endemic and outbreaks may be less common or obvious than in industrialized countries
43
(Zaidi et al., 2008). Despite this incomplete outbreak information in Brazil there are several reports of
44
Salmonella prevalence in chicken carcasses ranging from 5.9% to 86.7% (Cardoso & Tessari, 2008;
45
Duarte et al., 2009; Fuzihara, Fernandes, & Franco, 2000; Matheus, Rudge, & Gomes, 2003; Oliveira
46
et al., 2006).
SC
RI PT
40
Campylobacter prevalence around the world is very variable and range from 0.29% to 96.7%
48
in chicken carcass (Aquino, Pacheco, Ferreira, & Tibana, 2002; Garin et al., 2012; Wang, Guo, & Li,
49
2013). In Brazil, the Campylobacter presence is not investigated in most cases of bacterial
50
gastroenteritis because the methodologies of isolation and characterization are different from those
51
used in the research of common enteropathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella, Shigella and the E.
52
coli group. However, some authors such as Aquino et al. (2002) and Hungaro et al. (2015) found 60%
53
and 16.8% of Campylobacter prevalence in chicken carcasses respectively.
M AN U
47
Fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, have an extensive application both
55
in human and veterinary medicine with spectrum of action over Gram-negative and Gram-positive
56
bacteria (Ruiz, 2003). Enrofloxacin, a quinolone developed exclusively for use in animals, has a wide
57
antibacterial activity and is commonly used in poultry production in Brazil. Ciprofloxacin, a
58
metabolite of enrofloxacin (Idowu, Peggins, Cullison, & Bredow, 2010), besides its use in poultry
59
production, is also used for the treatment of human Salmonellosis and Campylobacteriosis (Agunos et
60
al., 2013). Once fluoroquinolones residues could persists in the animal body and may result in the
61
development of bacteria resistant strains, several studies have linked the therapeutically and
62
prophylactically use with the emergence and spread of resistance from these pathogens (Cheng et al.,
63
2012; Finley et al., 2013; Yan, Wang, Qin, Liu, & Du, 2011).
EP
AC C
64
TE D
54
Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing worldwide concern and has been developed over the
65
past 30 years regarding the emergence of multidrug-resistant phenotypes among Salmonella and
66
Campylobacter (Hur, Jawale, & Lee, 2012). Alarmed by the rise in multidrug-resistant Salmonella in
67
the 1960s, the United Kingdom’s Swann Report of 1969 recognized the possibility that AGPs
68
(Antimicrobial Growth Promoters) were contributing largely to the problem of drug-resistant
69
infections. These reports concluded that animal growth promotion with antibiotics used for human
70
therapy should be banned. However, this practice has continued in many countries although with
71
antibiotics that are not used therapeutically in humans (Marshall & Levy, 2011). 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 72
We notice that little is known with regards to the simultaneous occurrence of Campylobacter
73
and Salmonella on chicken carcasses in Brazil, and their resistance to fluoroquinolones. Therefore, the
74
aim of this study was to investigate their prevalence and pattern of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin
75
resistance in carcasses of slaughtered chicken in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
77
2. Materials and methods
78
2.1. Sample collection
RI PT
76
During 6 months in 2013, 60 chicken carcasses were collected from 6 slaughterhouses in state
80
of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. From each slaughterhouse, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly collected
81
from the chiller tank and transported on ice in sterilized plastic bags to the laboratory. Microbiological
82
analyses were carried out within at least 3 hours after collection. The slaughterhouses were also
83
randomly selected and its identification were preserved changing their names by the letters A to F. 2.2. Salmonella examination method
M AN U
84
SC
79
85
Skin samples of neck, breast and cloacal (25g) were homogenized in a stomacher (Stomacher
86
80 Laboratory Blender Seward) for 2 minutes and pre enriched with 225 mL of buffered peptone water
87
(BPW) at 37°C for 24h. After incubation, isolation of Salmonella was performed in general
88
accordance with U.S.FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual (Hammack, Andrews, & Jacobson,
89
2014). Isolates were subjected to Salmonella Poly O and Poly H antibody assays (Probac do Brazil®). At the same time, Salmonella detection was performed by PCR. The analyses were carried out
91
using 1.0 mL of 24h pre-enrichment incubated buffered peptone water (BPW) at 37°C. DNA
92
extraction and amplifications were performed in accordance with Myint, Johnson, Tablante, &
93
Heckert (2006). The primer set of ST 11 (AGC CAA CCA TTG CTA AAT TGG CGC A) and ST 15
94
(GGT AGA AAT TCC CAG CGG GTA CTG), originally designed by Aabo, Rasmussen, Roseen,
95
Sørensen, & Olsen (1993), is highly specific for Salmonella species and defines an amplified fragment
96
of 429 bp. Salmonella isolates were sent to the National Reference Center, Institute Oswaldo Cruz,
97
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for serotyping.
99
EP
AC C
98
TE D
90
2.3. Campylobacter examination method The chicken carcass were rinsed with 250 mL of 0.1% buffered peptone water and massaged
100
in sterile plastic bag. Loopfuls were used for Campylobacter isolation according to Stern, Patton,
101
Doyle, Park, & Mccardell (1992) and 3 to 5 suspected colonies per each plate were picked and
102
identificated by PCR in accordance with Harmon, Ransom, & Wesley (1997). DNA was extracted
103
with the commercial extraction kit 'Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit' (PROMEGA®). Primers
104
used were pg3/pg50 that amplify a conserved region in the two species (C. jejuni and C. coli) related
105
to flagellin gene and primers C-1/C-4 which amplify a specific region of the species C. jejuni strains.
106
The amplification reaction was performed with a final volume of 50 mL containing 5µL of the sample 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT DNA, 1X PCR Buffer (500 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 4 µL (200 µM each) dATP, dCTP,
108
dGTP and dTTP, 0.4 uM of each primer pg3 and pg50, 0.2 µM of each primer C1 and C4, 2.5 U Taq
109
polymerase and 5.5 mM/L MgCl2. The initial denaturation was performed at 94°C for four minutes
110
followed by 25 amplification cycles consisting of one minute at 94°C, one minute at 55°C, one minute
111
at 72°C and extension at 72°C for seven minutes. Verification of amplicons was performed in a
112
horizontal electrophoresis tank 'Electrophoresis Cell (BioAmérica) with 0.5x TBE, with Pac Power
113
source 300 (Bio-Rad) in 1.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed.
RI PT
107
2.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility test
115
Salmonella and Campylobacter isolates were tested for enrofloxacin (5µg) and ciprofloxacin (5µg)
116
(Cefar Brazil) susceptibilities. The susceptibility testing was primarily done by the disk diffusion
117
method and later by assessing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against all the resistant
118
isolates detected by disk diffusion method. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was
119
determined by the agar dilution method containing ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich®)
120
on the following concentrations: 128 µg/mL, 64 µg/mL, 32 µg/mL, 16 µg/mL, 8 µg/mL, 4 µg/mL, 2
121
µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, 0.5 µg/mL (NCCLS, 2003). The MIC were decided based on visible growth and
122
breakpoint of ≥ 4 µg/mL for ciprofloxacin (CLSI, 2008) and enrofloxacin (Chen et al., 2010) were
123
used. C. jejuni ATCC 33560 and C. Coli ATCC 33559 were included on every plate as a quality
124
control.
M AN U
125
SC
114
2.5. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses for Salmonella detection methods followed procedures described
127
previously (Thrusfield, 2007). The program InStat, version 3.1 (GraphPad, 2009) was used for the
128
calculations. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact two-tailed test were used for statistical analysis. A
129
P value < 0.05 was used for statistical significance.
TE D
126
3. Results and Discussion
131
Salmonella was isolated from 4 (6.67%) of 60 samples. Two S. Albany and one S. Typhimurium
132
were isolated from the slaughterhouse “B” and one S. Typhimurium was isolated from the
133
slaughterhouse “F” (Table 1). Salmonella was detected in 5 (8.33%) of 60 chicken carcasses by PCR,
134
but only four Salmonella positive carcasses by isolation matched the PCR results (Table 1). No
135
significant statistical differences were found between conventional isolation and PCR detection by the
136
Fisher Exact Test (p > 0.05).
AC C
EP
130
137
Relating to other previous investigations conducted in Brazil, our results have shown a slightly
138
lower overall Salmonella contamination of chicken carcasses by both detection techniques when
139
compared to Fuzihara et al. (2000) (41%) and Oliveira et al. (2006) (11.8%). However, similar results
140
were described by Matheus et al. (2003) (5.9%) and Duarte et al. (2009) (9.6%). Salmonella
141
prevalence observed in this study (6.67%) is also much lower than the observed in other developing
142
countries including Iran (33%) (Dallal et al., 2010), Cambodia (88.2%) (Lay, Vuthy, Song, Phol, & 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 143
Sarthou, 2011) Vietnam (45.9%) (Ta et al., 2012), and Colombia (27%) (Donado-Godoy et al., 2012).
144
It is well known that laborers training, good manufacturing practices and HACCP influence the
145
contamination level during the slaughter process. Most of visited slaughterhouses had good
146
manufacturing practices what could explain the low prevalence described in this study. Although the PCR technique has detected 5 positive samples versus 4 positive samples
148
obtained by isolation, no statistical difference was found between both methods. Salmonella
149
Typhimurium and S. Albany were the only serotypes identified in this research. Besides S. Enteritidis,
150
S. Typhimurium head the two top serotypes responsible for human salmonellosis in the world
151
(Hendriksen et al., 2011). Although S. Albany is an uncommon serotype on chicken carcass around
152
the world, this was not the first time that this serotype was isolated from chicken carcasses in Brazil
153
(Fuzihara et al., 2000). Ta et al. (2014), also found S. Albany serotype on Chicken carcasses from
154
Retail Markets in Vietnam.
SC
RI PT
147
Unlike Salmonella, Campylobacter was isolated from all slaughterhouses investigated in this
156
study, and 82 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from 27 (45%) chicken carcasses contaminated
157
with this pathogen. Forty four isolates (53.66%) were identified as Campylobacter jejuni and 38
158
(46.34%) as Campylobacter coli. (Table 2). Campylobacter jejuni was predominant and these data are
159
similar to reports from other countries as in Senegal, Cameroon, New Caledonia, Madagascar,
160
Vietnam (Garin et al., 2012) and China (Huang, Zong, Zhao, Zhu, & Jiao, 2015).
M AN U
155
We found a prevalence of Campylobacter in carcasses ranging from 10% to 80% depending on
162
the slaughterhouse. In two slaughterhouses (B and F) was observed a higher prevalence of both
163
Campylobacter and Salmonella, what could be explained by the poor conditions of the evisceration
164
process. On the other hand, no Salmonella and a lower Campylobacter prevalence were found in
165
slaughterhouses D and E. The occurrence of both Salmonella and Campylobacter in the same broiler
166
samples was also reported before (Franz, van der Fels-Klerx, Thissen, & van Asselt, 2012) and their
167
presence in this product is resultant of the contamination level and hygienic processing in poultry
168
raising sites, layers, hatcheries, chicken farms and slaughterhouses. In this study, the investigated
169
slaughterhouses were registered in State Inspection Service. In Brazil, there is a Pathogen Reduction
170
Program of Agriculture Ministry for detection of Salmonella sp. in broiler and turkey carcasses in
171
natura, involving all slaughterhouses registered in Federal Inspection Service, however, there is no
172
requirement for Campylobacter detection.
EP
AC C
173
TE D
161
We found in this study, Campylobacter more prevalent than Salmonella. Many previous
174
studies have found that chicken is more contaminated with Campylobacter compared to Salmonella
175
(Berghaus et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2015; Madden, Moran, Scates, McBride, & Kelly, 2011). The
176
variable prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella on poultry carcasses around the world can be
177
resultant of the type and number of samples, different methods of collection of samples, transport
178
conditions, laboratory methods, and different sanitary conditions on poultry farms and
179
slaughterhouses. 5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT All Salmonella serotypes were sensitive to ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, however, all
181
Campylobacter isolates were resistant to these antibiotics by Disk Diffusion Method and Minimal
182
Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). A high-level resistance, substantiated by the values obtained at CIM,
183
ranging from ≥ 8 µg.mL-1 to ≤ 64 µg.mL-1 for enrofloxacin and from ≥ 16 µg.mL-1 to ≤ 128 µg.mL-1
184
for ciprofloxacin were observed. One C. jejuni and two C. coli strains had MIC = 64 µg/mL to
185
enrofloxacin, and one C. jejuni and three C. coli strains had MIC = 128 µg/mL to ciprofloxacin by the
186
agar dilution method (Table 3).
RI PT
180
Salmonella isolates in this study were sensitive to fluoroquinolones and although several
188
studies around the world have reported high prevalence of Salmonella resistant strains to
189
fluoroquinolones, no resistance was also observed in studies in Iran (Dallal et al., 2010), Spain
190
(Álvarez-Fernández, Alonso-Calleja, García-Fernández, & Capita, 2012) and USA (Berrang et al.,
191
2009). On the other hand, our findings revealed a high prevalence (100%) of fluoroquinolone-resistant
192
Campylobacter in chicken carcasses. Results from other studies performed in Brazil, also showed a
193
high C. jejuni - resistance rate of 100% and 95% to ciprofloxacin (de Moura et al., 2013; Hungaro et
194
al., 2015), respectively. In other countries, similar results were found such as in Korea (88%) (Kang et
195
al., 2006), South Africa (91%) (Bester & Essack, 2008), China (98%) (Chen et al., 2010), and Italy
196
(79%) (Nobile, Costantino, Bianco, Pileggi, & Pavia, 2013). Our study also revealed a high level of
197
resistance to the fluoroquinolones, since 77.27% of C. jejuni and 76.32% of C. coli had ciprofloxacin
198
MIC’s ≤ 64 µg.mL-1 and four strains (4.87%) had MIC’s ≤ 128 µg.mL-1. A lower level of resistance to
199
enrofloxacin was observed when compared to ciprofloxacin, since only one strain of C. jejuni (2.27%)
200
and two strains of C. coli (5.26%) had enrofloxacin MIC’s = 64 µg.mL-1.
TE D
M AN U
SC
187
Accordingly to Mayrhofer, Paulsen, Smulders, & Hilbert (2004), the lack of resistance by
202
Salmonella strains might originate from the function of the main target of the drugs, the DNA gyrase.
203
It might well be that in aerobically growing bacteria as Salmonella and E. coli, DNA gyrase has a
204
more important role to stabilize the helix structure, as the helix is less supercoiled than in
205
anaerobically or micro aerobically growing bacteria and that could explain why it is most common to
206
find high quinolones resistance in Campylobacter than in Salmonella. Furthermore, fluoroquinolone
207
treatment in Campylobacter rapidly selects high levels of resistance and a single point mutation in the
208
gyrA gene is sufficient to confer high level of fluoroquinolone resistance (McDermott et al., 2002).
209
This appears to be a characteristic of Campylobacter, since in the results reported by van Boven,
210
Veldman, Jong, & Mevius (2003) the treatment with fluoroquinolones could reduce the presence of
211
Escherichia coli below the level of detection and do not induced resistance in this organism.
AC C
EP
201
212
Although fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter has already been well reported, the high
213
level and prevalence of resistance found in this study appear to be among the most alarming. This is a
214
concerning situation once fluoquinolone-resistant Campylobacter become dominant in poultry even in
215
the absence of selection pressure (Luo et al., 2005) and only ban the use of it in poultry production
216
would be inefficient. This enhances the potential role of raw chicken carcasses in the circulation of 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 217
resistant Campylobacter strains in humans in Brazil, and demands more careful attention on antibiotics
218
use in the animal production. In countries where fluoroquinolones are not accepted to use in poultry
219
production, no ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin resistant Campylobacter were isolated from poultry,
220
such as in Australia and Norway (Miflin, Templeton, & Blackall, 2007; Norström et al., 2006). Fluoroquinolones are not labelled for use as growth promotion in Brazil. However,
222
enrofloxacin is routinely used in poultry production for preventive and therapeutic purposes and might
223
represent one potential source of pollution to the environment, enhancing fluoroquinolone resistance.
224
Leal, Figueira, Tornisielo, & Regitano (2012) evaluated sorption–desorption and occurrence of
225
commonly used fluoroquinolones in poultry litter and soil samples from São Paulo state in Brazil and
226
found enrofloxacin as the most often detected compound, present in 30% of poultry litters and in 27%
227
of soils at the highest mean concentrations.
SC
228
RI PT
221
4. Conclusions
Besides the presence of Salmonella, this study reveals a significant contamination of chicken
230
carcasses with fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in Rio de Janeiro state. These data may draw
231
the attention about the widespread use of fluoroquinolones at poultry production in Brazil and alert
232
veterinary services about these enteric bacteria in chicken products in order to avoid their occurrence
233
at the poultry farming and to improve the hygiene practices at the slaughter.
M AN U
229
234
236
Acknowledgments
TE D
235
We wish to thank Dr. Dalia Rodrigues (FIOCRUZ) for Salmonella serotyping. This study was supported by a grant from the CAPES for post-graduation program in Brazil.
238
References
239
Aabo, S., Rasmussen, O. F., Roseen, L., Sørensen, P. D., & Olsen, J. E. (1993). Salmonella
240
identification by the polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 7(3), 171–
241
178. http://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1993.1026
AC C
EP
237
242
Agunos, A., Léger, D., Avery, B. P., Parmley, E. J., Deckert, A., Carson, C. A., & Dutil, L. (2013).
243
Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Retail Chicken, Western Canada. Emerging
244
Infectious Diseases, 19(7), 1121–1124. http://doi.org/10.3201/eid1907.111417
245
Álvarez-Fernández, E., Alonso-Calleja, C., García-Fernández, C., & Capita, R. (2012). Prevalence and
246
antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serotypes isolated from poultry in Spain: Comparison
247
between 1993 and 2006. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 153(3), 281–287.
248
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.011 7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 249
Aquino, M. H. C., Pacheco, A. P. G., Ferreira, M. C. S., & Tibana, A. (2002). Frequency of Isolation
250
and Identification of Thermophilic Campylobacters from Animals in Brazil. The Veterinary
251
Journal, 164(2), 159–161. http://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0698 Berghaus, R. D., Thayer, S. G., Law, B. F., Mild, R. M., Hofacre, C. L., & Singer, R. S. (2013).
253
Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in Environmental Farm Samples and
254
Processing Plant Carcass Rinses from Commercial Broiler Chicken Flocks. Applied and
255
Environmental Microbiology, 79(13), 4106–4114. http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00836-13
RI PT
252
Berrang, M. E., Bailey, J. S., Altekruse, S. F., Shaw, W. K., Patel, B. L., Meinersmann, R. J., &
257
Fedorka-Cray, P. J. (2009). Prevalence, Serotype, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella
258
on Broiler Carcasses Postpick and Postchill in 20 U.S. Processing Plants. Journal of Food
259
Protection, 72(8), 1610–1615.
M AN U
SC
256
260
Bester, L. A., & Essack, S. Y. (2008). Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter isolates
261
from commercial poultry suppliers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Antimicrobial
262
Chemotherapy, 62(6), 1298–1300. http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn408 Cardoso, A., & Tessari, E. (2008). Salmonela na segurança dos alimentos. Biológico, 70, 11–13.
264
Cheng, A. C., Turnidge, J., Collignon, P., Looke, D., Barton, M., & Gottlieb, T. (2012). Control of
265
Fluoroquinolone Resistance through Successful Regulation, Australia. Emerging Infectious
266
Diseases, 18(9), 1453–1460. http://doi.org/10.3201/eid1809.111515
EP
TE D
263
Chen, X., Naren, G.-W., Wu, C.-M., Wang, Y., Dai, L., Xia, L.-N., Shen, J.-Z. (2010). Prevalence and
268
antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates in broilers from China. Veterinary
269
AC C
267
Microbiology, 144(1-2), 133–139. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.035
270
CLSI. (2008). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for
271
Bacteria Isolated From Animals; Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M31-A3. Wayne,
272
PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
273
Dallal, M. M. S., Doyle, M. P., Rezadehbashi, M., Dabiri, H., Sanaei, M., Modarresi, S., Sharifi-
274
Yazdi, M. K. (2010). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella serotypes,
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 275
Campylobacter and Yersinia spp. isolated from retail chicken and beef, Tehran, Iran. Food
276
Control, 21(4), 388–392. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.06.001
277
de Moura, H. M., Silva, P. R., da Silva, P. H. C., Souza, N. R., Racanicci, A. M. C., & Santana, Â. P.
278
(2013). Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Chicken Carcasses in
279
the
280
http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-485
District,
Brazil.
Journal
of
Food
Protection,
76(4),
691–693.
RI PT
Federal
Donado-Godoy, P., Clavijo, V., León, M., Tafur, M. A., Gonzales, S., Hume, M., Doyle, M. P. (2012).
282
Prevalence of Salmonella on Retail Broiler Chicken Meat Carcasses in Colombia. Journal of
283
Food Protection, 75(6), 1134–1138. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-513
SC
281
Duarte, D. A. M., Ribeiro, A. R., Vasconcelos, A. M. M., Santos, S. B., Silva, J. V. D., de Andrade, P.
285
L. A., & de Arruda Falcão, L. S. P. da C. (2009). Occurrence of Salmonella spp. in broiler
286
chicken carcasses and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Brazilian Journal of
287
Microbiology, 40(3), 569–573. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822009000300
M AN U
284
EFSA. (2013). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic
289
Agents and Food-borne Outbreaks in 2011 (No. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3129) (p. 250). EFSA
290
Journal 2013;11(4):3129. Retrieved from www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal
291
TE D
288
FAO/WHO. (2009). Salmonella and campylobacter in chicken meat. Microbiological risk assessment series
19,
meeting
report.
World
Health
293
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/mra19/en/
Organization.
Retrieved
from
EP
292
Finley, R. L., Collignon, P., Larsson, D. G. J., McEwen, S. A., Li, X.-Z., Gaze, W. H., Topp, E.
295
(2013). The Scourge of Antibiotic Resistance: The Important Role of the Environment.
296
AC C
294
Clinical Infectious Diseases, cit355. http://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit355
297
Franz, E., van der Fels-Klerx, H. J., Thissen, J., & van Asselt, E. D. (2012). Farm and slaughterhouse
298
characteristics affecting the occurrence of Salmonella and Campylobacter in the broiler supply
299
chain. Poultry Science, 91(9), 2376–2381. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00367
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 300
Fuzihara, T. O., Fernandes, S. A., & Franco, B. D. (2000). Prevalence and dissemination of
301
Salmonella serotypes along the slaughtering process in Brazilian small poultry
302
slaughterhouses. Journal of Food Protection, 63(12), 1749–1753. Garin, B., Gouali, M., Wouafo, M., Perchec, A.-M., Thu, P. M., Ravaonindrina, N., Pouillot, R.
304
(2012). Prevalence, quantification and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. on
305
chicken neck-skins at points of slaughter in 5 major cities located on 4 continents.
306
International
307
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.020
of
Food
Microbiology,
157(1),
102–107.
SC
Journal
RI PT
303
GraphPad. (2009). InStat 3.0 User’s Guide. San Diego, CA: GraphPad Software Inc.
309
Hammack, T., Andrews, W. H., & Jacobson, A. (2014). USFDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual Retrieved
M AN U
308
310
[WebContent].
June
11,
2015,
from
311
http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm070149.htm#Prep Harmon, K. M., Ransom, G. M., & Wesley, I. V. (1997). Differentiation of Campylobacter
313
jejuniandCampylobacter coliby polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes,
314
11(3), 195–200. http://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1997.0104
TE D
312
Hendriksen, R. S., Vieira, A. R., Karlsmose, S., Fo Wong, D. M. A. Lo, Jensen, A. B., Wegener, H.
316
C., & Aarestrup, F. M. (2011). Global Monitoring of Salmonella Serovar Distribution from
317
the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank:
318
Results of Quality Assured Laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathogens and
319
Disease, 8(8), 887–900. http://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0787
AC C
EP
315
320
Huang, J., Zong, Q., Zhao, F., Zhu, J., & Jiao, X. (2015). Quantitative surveys of Salmonella and
321
Campylobacter on retail raw chicken in Yangzhou, China. Food Control, 59, 68–73.
322
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.009
323
Hungaro, H. M., Mendonça, R. C. S., Rosa, V. O., Badaró, A. C. L., Moreira, M. A. S., & Chaves, J.
324
B. P. (2015). Low contamination of Campylobacter spp. on chicken carcasses in Minas Gerais
325
state, Brazil: Molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance. Food Control, 51, 15–
326
22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.11.001 10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 327
Hur, J., Jawale, C., & Lee, J. H. (2012). Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from food
328
animals:
A
review.
Food
Research
329
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.014
International,
45(2),
819–830.
Idowu, O. R., Peggins, J. O., Cullison, R., & Bredow, J. von. (2010). Comparative pharmacokinetics
331
of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in lactating dairy cows and beef steers following
332
intravenous administration of enrofloxacin. Research in Veterinary Science, 89(2), 230–235.
333
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.12.019
RI PT
330
Kang, Y.-S., Cho, Y.-S., Yoon, S.-K., Yu, M.-A., Kim, C.-M., Lee, J.-O., & Pyun, Y.-R. (2006).
335
Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli
336
Isolated from Raw Chicken Meat and Human Stools in Korea. Journal of Food Protection,
337
69(12), 2915–2923.
M AN U
SC
334
Lay, K. S., Vuthy, Y., Song, P., Phol, K., & Sarthou, J. L. (2011). Prevalence, numbers and
339
antimicrobial susceptibilities of Salmonella serovars and Campylobacter spp. in retail poultry
340
in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science / the Japanese Society
341
of Veterinary Science, 73(3), 325–329.
TE D
338
Leal, R. M. P., Figueira, R. F., Tornisielo, V. L., & Regitano, J. B. (2012). Occurrence and sorption of
343
fluoroquinolones in poultry litters and soils from São Paulo State, Brazil. Science of The Total
344
Environment, 432, 344–349. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.002
EP
342
Luo, N., Pereira, S., Sahin, O., Lin, J., Huang, S., Michel, L., & Zhang, Q. (2005). Enhanced in vivo
346
fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in the absence of antibiotic selection
347 348
AC C
345
pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
102(3), 541–546. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408966102
349
Madden, R. H., Moran, L., Scates, P., McBride, J., & Kelly, C. (2011). Prevalence of Campylobacter
350
and Salmonella in Raw Chicken on Retail Sale in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Food
351
Protection, 74(11), 1912–1916. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-104
352
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011). Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health.
353
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 24(4), 718–733. http://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00002-11 11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 354
Matheus, D. P., Rudge, A. C., & Gomes, S. M. M. (2003). Ocorrência de Salmonella spp em carne de
355
frango comercializada no municípion de Bauru, SP, Brasil. Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz, 62(2), 111–
356
115. Mayrhofer, S., Paulsen, P., Smulders, F. J. M., & Hilbert, F. (2004). Antimicrobial resistance profile
358
of five major food-borne pathogens isolated from beef, pork and poultry. International
359
Journal of Food Microbiology, 97(1), 23–29. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.04.006
360
McDermott, P. F., Bodeis, S. M., English, L. L., White, D. G., Walker, R. D., Zhao, S., Wagner, D. D.
361
(2002). Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Evolves Rapidly in Chickens
362
Treated with Fluoroquinolones. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 185(6), 837–840.
363
http://doi.org/10.1086/339195
M AN U
SC
RI PT
357
364
Miflin, J. K., Templeton, J. M., & Blackall, P. J. (2007). Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni
365
and Campylobacter coli isolated from poultry in the South-East Queensland region. Journal of
366
Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 59(4), 775–778. http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm024 Myint, M. S., Johnson, Y. J., Tablante, N. L., & Heckert, R. A. (2006). The effect of pre-enrichment
368
protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated
369
Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture. Food Microbiology, 23(6), 599–
370
604. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.09.002
372
NCCLS. (2003). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Test for
EP
371
TE D
367
Bacteria Isolates from Animal (Approved Standard, 2nd ed., M31-A2). Wayne, PA. Nobile, C. G. A., Costantino, R., Bianco, A., Pileggi, C., & Pavia, M. (2013). Prevalence and pattern
374
of antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter spp. in poultry meat in Southern Italy. Food Control,
375
AC C
373
32(2), 715–718. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.011
376
Norström, M., Hofshagen, M., Stavnes, T., Schau, J., Lassen, J., & Kruse, H. (2006). Antimicrobial
377
resistance in Campylobacter jejuni from humans and broilers in Norway. Epidemiology &
378
Infection, 134(01), 127–130. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268805004814
379
Oliveira, W. F., Cardoso, W. M., Salles, R. P. R., Romão, J. M., Teixeira, R. S. C., Câmara, S. R., …
380
Marques, L. C. L. (2006). Initial identification and sensitivity to antimicrobial agents of 12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Salmonella sp.isolated from poultry products in the state of Ceara, Brazil. Revista Brasileira
382
de Ciência Avícola, 8(3), 193–199. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000300010
383
Ruiz, J. (2003). Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation
384
and DNA gyrase protection. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 51(5), 1109–1117.
385
http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg222
RI PT
381
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Griffin, P.
387
M. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect
388
Dis, 17(7).
SC
386
Stern, N. ., Patton, C. ., Doyle, M. ., Park, C. ., & Mccardell, B. (1992). Campylobacter. In
390
Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. (pp. 475–489).
391
Washington DC: C. Vanderzant & D. F. Splittstoesser - American Society for Microbiology.
M AN U
389
392
Ta, Y. T., Nguyen, T. T., To, P. B., Pham, D. X., Le, H. T. H., Alali, W. Q., Doyle, M. P. (2012).
393
Prevalence of Salmonella on Chicken Carcasses from Retail Markets in Vietnam. Journal of
394
Food Protection, 75(10), 1851–1854. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-130 Ta, Y. T., Nguyen, T. T., To, P. B., Pham, D. X., Le, H. T. H., Thi, G. N., Doyle, M. P. (2014).
396
Quantification, Serovars, and Antibiotic Resistance of Salmonella Isolated from Retail Raw
397
Chicken
398
http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-221
in
Vietnam.
Journal
of
Food
Protection,
77(1),
57–66.
EP
Meat
TE D
395
Thrusfield, M. (2007). Veterinary Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Scotland, UK: Wiley.
400
van Boven, M., Veldman, K. T., Jong, M. C. M. de, & Mevius, D. J. (2003). Rapid selection of
401
quinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni but not in Escherichia coli in individually
402 403 404
AC C
399
housed
broilers.
Journal
of
Antimicrobial
Chemotherapy,
52(4),
719–723.
http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg402
Wang, J., Guo, Y. C., & Li, N. (2013). Prevalence and Risk Assessment of Campylobacter jejuni in
405
Chicken
in
China.
Biomedical
and
406
http://doi.org/10.3967/0895-3988.2013.04.002
13
Environmental
Sciences,
26(4),
243–248.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 407
Yan, H., Wang, H., Qin, X., Liu, B., & Du, J. (2011). Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid
408
microextraction for determination of fluoroquinolones in pharmaceutical wastewater. Journal
409
of
410
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.08.007
Pharmaceutical
and
Biomedical
Analysis,
54(1),
53–57.
Zaidi, M. B., Calva, J. J., Estrada-Garcia, M. T., Leon, V., Vazquez, G., Figueroa, G., Tollefson, L.
412
(2008). Integrated Food Chain Surveillance System for Salmonella spp. in Mexico. Emerging
413
Infectious Diseases, 14(3), 429–435. http://doi.org/10.3201/eid1403.071057
RI PT
411
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
414
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1 Total prevalence, PCR detection and serotype identification of Salmonella isolated from chicken carcasses slaughtered in State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Sample identification
Serotype
PCR detection
A
-
Not isolated
Negative
11
S. Typhimurium
12
S Albany
14
S Albany
C
-
Not isolated
D
-
Not isolated
Negative
E
-
Not isolated
Negative
51
F
52
Salmonella spp. Salmonella spp. Negative
Not isolated
Salmonella spp.
S. Typhimurium
Salmonella spp.
4 (6.67)
5 (8.33)
TE D
Total (%)
Table 2
Salmonella spp.
SC
M AN U
B
RI PT
Slaughterhouse
Campylobacter prevalence and distribution among chicken carcasses slaughtered in State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Contaminated chicken carcass (%)
C. jejuni (%)
C. coli (%)
Total
A
3 (30%)
11 (13.41%)
Not isolated
11
7 (70%)
06 (7.32%)
17 (20.73%)
23
6 (60%)
01 (1.22%)
18 (21.95%)
19
D
2 (20%)
03 (3.66%)
Not isolated
03
E
1 (10%)
01 (1.22%)
01 (1.22%)
02
F
8 (80%)
22 (26.83%)
02 (2.44%)
24
Total
27 (45%)
44 (53.66%)
38 (46.34%)
82
B
AC C
C
EP
Slaughterhouse
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3 Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin resistance level of Campylobacter isolates by Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) tested. Enrofloxacin
64 µg/mL
32 µg/mL
16 µg/mL
C. jejuni 44 (100%) C. coli 38 (100%)
01 (2.27%)
01 (2.27%)
15 (34.09%)
02 (5.26%)
05 (13.16%)
18 (47.37%)
8 µg/mL
4 µg/mL
41 (93.18%)
44 (100%)
32 (84.21%)
38 (100%)
SC
Species (n) (%)
RI PT
Dilutions
Ciprofloxacin
M AN U
Dilutions 128 µg/mL
64 µg/mL
32 µg/mL
16 µg/mL
8 µg/mL
C. jejuni 44 (100%) C. coli 38 (100%)
01 (2.27%)
34 (77.27%)
42 (95.45%)
42 (95.45%)
44 (100%)
03 (7.89%)
29 (76.32%)
30 (78.95%)
32 (84.21%)
38 (100%)
AC C
EP
TE D
Species (n) (%)
2