Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Accepted Manuscript Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Braz...

622KB Sizes 77 Downloads 137 Views

Accepted Manuscript Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Pedro Henrique Nunes Panzenhagen, Waldemir Silva Aguiar, Beatriz da Silva Frasão, Virginia Léo de Almeida Pereira, Dayse Lima da Costa Abreu, Dalia dos Prazeres Rodrigues, Elmiro Rosendo do Nascimento, Maria Helena Cosendey de Aquino PII:

S0956-7135(15)30224-3

DOI:

10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.10.002

Reference:

JFCO 4680

To appear in:

Food Control

Received Date: 12 July 2015 Revised Date:

2 October 2015

Accepted Date: 6 October 2015

Please cite this article as: Panzenhagen P.H.N., Aguiar W.S., da Silva Frasão B., de Almeida Pereira V.L., da Costa Abreu D.L., dos Prazeres Rodrigues D., do Nascimento E.R. & de Aquino M.H.C., Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Food Control (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.10.002. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Prevalence and fluoroquinolones resistance of Campylobacter and

2

Salmonella isolates from poultry carcasses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

3

Pedro Henrique Nunes Panzenhagena*, Waldemir Silva Aguiara, Beatriz da Silva Frasãoa,

4

Virginia Léo de Almeida Pereiraa, Dayse Lima da Costa Abreua, Dalia dos Prazeres

5

Rodriguesb, Elmiro Rosendo do Nascimentoa, Maria Helena Cosendey de Aquinoa

7 8 9

a

Department of Veterinary Public Health and Public Health, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), 24230-

340, 64 Vital Brazil Filho Street, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. b

National Reference Laboratory Diagnosis of Enteric Bacteria, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz

Foundation (FIOCRUZ), 21045-900, 4365 Brazil Avenue, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

SC

6

RI PT

1

* Corresponding Author at: Analytical Laboratory Center, Department of Food Technology, Faculty of

11

Veterinary, Fluminense Federal University, 64, Vital Brazil Filho, Niterói - Rio de Janeiro - Brazil Zip Code:

12

24230-340. E-mail: [email protected] / Phone: +55-21-99567-9533 / +55-21-2268-5367

M AN U

10

13 Abstract

15

To investigate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in poultry carcasses in state of Rio de

16

Janeiro, Brazil, 60 samples from 6 slaughterhouses were collected over a period of 6 months. A total

17

of 82 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from twenty seven (45%) positive chicken carcasses,

18

including 44 isolates (53.66%) of Campylobacter jejuni and 38 (46.34%) of Campylobacter coli. The

19

identification of all strains was confirmed by PCR. Salmonella was isolated from 4 (6.67%) carcasses

20

by conventional method and was detected in 5 (8.33%) of 60 chicken carcasses by PCR. Two

21

Salmonella Albany and two Salmonella Typhimurium were identified. Antimicrobial susceptibility

22

testing was primarily done by the disk diffusion method and later by assessing minimum inhibitory

23

concentrations (MICs) against all the isolates. All the Campylobacter isolates were resistant to

24

ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin. It was observed high MIC values for enrofloxacin (64 µg/mL) in one

25

C. jejuni and two C. coli strains, and for ciprofloxacin (≥ 128 µg/mL) in one C. jejuni and three C.

26

coli strains. No Salmonella isolate was resistant to these antibiotics by both methods. These findings

27

reveal a broad extent of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter isolates from chicken carcasses

28

in Brazil and underline the need for prudent use of these antibiotics in poultry production to minimize

29

the spread of fluoroquinolone resistant Campylobacter.

30

Keywords: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Enrofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Chicken carcasses, Brazil

AC C

EP

TE D

14

31 32

1. Introduction

33

Salmonellosis and Campylobacteriosis are among the most frequently reported foodborne

34

diseases worldwide. While numerous potential vehicles of transmission exist, commercial chicken

35

meat has been identified as one of the most important food vehicles for these organisms (FAO/WHO, 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 36

2009). Although The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports Salmonella as leading

37

causes of hospitalization by foodborne illness in United States (Scallan et al., 2011), interestingly,

38

Campylobacter remains the most commonly reported gastrointestinal bacterial pathogen in humans

39

since 2005 within European Union population (EFSA, 2013). In developing countries, outbreak information is frequently incomplete because health

41

authorities lack the capabilities or resources for detection, or presumably, because diarrheal diseases

42

are highly endemic and outbreaks may be less common or obvious than in industrialized countries

43

(Zaidi et al., 2008). Despite this incomplete outbreak information in Brazil there are several reports of

44

Salmonella prevalence in chicken carcasses ranging from 5.9% to 86.7% (Cardoso & Tessari, 2008;

45

Duarte et al., 2009; Fuzihara, Fernandes, & Franco, 2000; Matheus, Rudge, & Gomes, 2003; Oliveira

46

et al., 2006).

SC

RI PT

40

Campylobacter prevalence around the world is very variable and range from 0.29% to 96.7%

48

in chicken carcass (Aquino, Pacheco, Ferreira, & Tibana, 2002; Garin et al., 2012; Wang, Guo, & Li,

49

2013). In Brazil, the Campylobacter presence is not investigated in most cases of bacterial

50

gastroenteritis because the methodologies of isolation and characterization are different from those

51

used in the research of common enteropathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella, Shigella and the E.

52

coli group. However, some authors such as Aquino et al. (2002) and Hungaro et al. (2015) found 60%

53

and 16.8% of Campylobacter prevalence in chicken carcasses respectively.

M AN U

47

Fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, have an extensive application both

55

in human and veterinary medicine with spectrum of action over Gram-negative and Gram-positive

56

bacteria (Ruiz, 2003). Enrofloxacin, a quinolone developed exclusively for use in animals, has a wide

57

antibacterial activity and is commonly used in poultry production in Brazil. Ciprofloxacin, a

58

metabolite of enrofloxacin (Idowu, Peggins, Cullison, & Bredow, 2010), besides its use in poultry

59

production, is also used for the treatment of human Salmonellosis and Campylobacteriosis (Agunos et

60

al., 2013). Once fluoroquinolones residues could persists in the animal body and may result in the

61

development of bacteria resistant strains, several studies have linked the therapeutically and

62

prophylactically use with the emergence and spread of resistance from these pathogens (Cheng et al.,

63

2012; Finley et al., 2013; Yan, Wang, Qin, Liu, & Du, 2011).

EP

AC C

64

TE D

54

Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing worldwide concern and has been developed over the

65

past 30 years regarding the emergence of multidrug-resistant phenotypes among Salmonella and

66

Campylobacter (Hur, Jawale, & Lee, 2012). Alarmed by the rise in multidrug-resistant Salmonella in

67

the 1960s, the United Kingdom’s Swann Report of 1969 recognized the possibility that AGPs

68

(Antimicrobial Growth Promoters) were contributing largely to the problem of drug-resistant

69

infections. These reports concluded that animal growth promotion with antibiotics used for human

70

therapy should be banned. However, this practice has continued in many countries although with

71

antibiotics that are not used therapeutically in humans (Marshall & Levy, 2011). 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 72

We notice that little is known with regards to the simultaneous occurrence of Campylobacter

73

and Salmonella on chicken carcasses in Brazil, and their resistance to fluoroquinolones. Therefore, the

74

aim of this study was to investigate their prevalence and pattern of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin

75

resistance in carcasses of slaughtered chicken in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.

77

2. Materials and methods

78

2.1. Sample collection

RI PT

76

During 6 months in 2013, 60 chicken carcasses were collected from 6 slaughterhouses in state

80

of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. From each slaughterhouse, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly collected

81

from the chiller tank and transported on ice in sterilized plastic bags to the laboratory. Microbiological

82

analyses were carried out within at least 3 hours after collection. The slaughterhouses were also

83

randomly selected and its identification were preserved changing their names by the letters A to F. 2.2. Salmonella examination method

M AN U

84

SC

79

85

Skin samples of neck, breast and cloacal (25g) were homogenized in a stomacher (Stomacher

86

80 Laboratory Blender Seward) for 2 minutes and pre enriched with 225 mL of buffered peptone water

87

(BPW) at 37°C for 24h. After incubation, isolation of Salmonella was performed in general

88

accordance with U.S.FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual (Hammack, Andrews, & Jacobson,

89

2014). Isolates were subjected to Salmonella Poly O and Poly H antibody assays (Probac do Brazil®). At the same time, Salmonella detection was performed by PCR. The analyses were carried out

91

using 1.0 mL of 24h pre-enrichment incubated buffered peptone water (BPW) at 37°C. DNA

92

extraction and amplifications were performed in accordance with Myint, Johnson, Tablante, &

93

Heckert (2006). The primer set of ST 11 (AGC CAA CCA TTG CTA AAT TGG CGC A) and ST 15

94

(GGT AGA AAT TCC CAG CGG GTA CTG), originally designed by Aabo, Rasmussen, Roseen,

95

Sørensen, & Olsen (1993), is highly specific for Salmonella species and defines an amplified fragment

96

of 429 bp. Salmonella isolates were sent to the National Reference Center, Institute Oswaldo Cruz,

97

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for serotyping.

99

EP

AC C

98

TE D

90

2.3. Campylobacter examination method The chicken carcass were rinsed with 250 mL of 0.1% buffered peptone water and massaged

100

in sterile plastic bag. Loopfuls were used for Campylobacter isolation according to Stern, Patton,

101

Doyle, Park, & Mccardell (1992) and 3 to 5 suspected colonies per each plate were picked and

102

identificated by PCR in accordance with Harmon, Ransom, & Wesley (1997). DNA was extracted

103

with the commercial extraction kit 'Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit' (PROMEGA®). Primers

104

used were pg3/pg50 that amplify a conserved region in the two species (C. jejuni and C. coli) related

105

to flagellin gene and primers C-1/C-4 which amplify a specific region of the species C. jejuni strains.

106

The amplification reaction was performed with a final volume of 50 mL containing 5µL of the sample 3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT DNA, 1X PCR Buffer (500 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 4 µL (200 µM each) dATP, dCTP,

108

dGTP and dTTP, 0.4 uM of each primer pg3 and pg50, 0.2 µM of each primer C1 and C4, 2.5 U Taq

109

polymerase and 5.5 mM/L MgCl2. The initial denaturation was performed at 94°C for four minutes

110

followed by 25 amplification cycles consisting of one minute at 94°C, one minute at 55°C, one minute

111

at 72°C and extension at 72°C for seven minutes. Verification of amplicons was performed in a

112

horizontal electrophoresis tank 'Electrophoresis Cell (BioAmérica) with 0.5x TBE, with Pac Power

113

source 300 (Bio-Rad) in 1.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed.

RI PT

107

2.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility test

115

Salmonella and Campylobacter isolates were tested for enrofloxacin (5µg) and ciprofloxacin (5µg)

116

(Cefar Brazil) susceptibilities. The susceptibility testing was primarily done by the disk diffusion

117

method and later by assessing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against all the resistant

118

isolates detected by disk diffusion method. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was

119

determined by the agar dilution method containing ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich®)

120

on the following concentrations: 128 µg/mL, 64 µg/mL, 32 µg/mL, 16 µg/mL, 8 µg/mL, 4 µg/mL, 2

121

µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, 0.5 µg/mL (NCCLS, 2003). The MIC were decided based on visible growth and

122

breakpoint of ≥ 4 µg/mL for ciprofloxacin (CLSI, 2008) and enrofloxacin (Chen et al., 2010) were

123

used. C. jejuni ATCC 33560 and C. Coli ATCC 33559 were included on every plate as a quality

124

control.

M AN U

125

SC

114

2.5. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses for Salmonella detection methods followed procedures described

127

previously (Thrusfield, 2007). The program InStat, version 3.1 (GraphPad, 2009) was used for the

128

calculations. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact two-tailed test were used for statistical analysis. A

129

P value < 0.05 was used for statistical significance.

TE D

126

3. Results and Discussion

131

Salmonella was isolated from 4 (6.67%) of 60 samples. Two S. Albany and one S. Typhimurium

132

were isolated from the slaughterhouse “B” and one S. Typhimurium was isolated from the

133

slaughterhouse “F” (Table 1). Salmonella was detected in 5 (8.33%) of 60 chicken carcasses by PCR,

134

but only four Salmonella positive carcasses by isolation matched the PCR results (Table 1). No

135

significant statistical differences were found between conventional isolation and PCR detection by the

136

Fisher Exact Test (p > 0.05).

AC C

EP

130

137

Relating to other previous investigations conducted in Brazil, our results have shown a slightly

138

lower overall Salmonella contamination of chicken carcasses by both detection techniques when

139

compared to Fuzihara et al. (2000) (41%) and Oliveira et al. (2006) (11.8%). However, similar results

140

were described by Matheus et al. (2003) (5.9%) and Duarte et al. (2009) (9.6%). Salmonella

141

prevalence observed in this study (6.67%) is also much lower than the observed in other developing

142

countries including Iran (33%) (Dallal et al., 2010), Cambodia (88.2%) (Lay, Vuthy, Song, Phol, & 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 143

Sarthou, 2011) Vietnam (45.9%) (Ta et al., 2012), and Colombia (27%) (Donado-Godoy et al., 2012).

144

It is well known that laborers training, good manufacturing practices and HACCP influence the

145

contamination level during the slaughter process. Most of visited slaughterhouses had good

146

manufacturing practices what could explain the low prevalence described in this study. Although the PCR technique has detected 5 positive samples versus 4 positive samples

148

obtained by isolation, no statistical difference was found between both methods. Salmonella

149

Typhimurium and S. Albany were the only serotypes identified in this research. Besides S. Enteritidis,

150

S. Typhimurium head the two top serotypes responsible for human salmonellosis in the world

151

(Hendriksen et al., 2011). Although S. Albany is an uncommon serotype on chicken carcass around

152

the world, this was not the first time that this serotype was isolated from chicken carcasses in Brazil

153

(Fuzihara et al., 2000). Ta et al. (2014), also found S. Albany serotype on Chicken carcasses from

154

Retail Markets in Vietnam.

SC

RI PT

147

Unlike Salmonella, Campylobacter was isolated from all slaughterhouses investigated in this

156

study, and 82 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from 27 (45%) chicken carcasses contaminated

157

with this pathogen. Forty four isolates (53.66%) were identified as Campylobacter jejuni and 38

158

(46.34%) as Campylobacter coli. (Table 2). Campylobacter jejuni was predominant and these data are

159

similar to reports from other countries as in Senegal, Cameroon, New Caledonia, Madagascar,

160

Vietnam (Garin et al., 2012) and China (Huang, Zong, Zhao, Zhu, & Jiao, 2015).

M AN U

155

We found a prevalence of Campylobacter in carcasses ranging from 10% to 80% depending on

162

the slaughterhouse. In two slaughterhouses (B and F) was observed a higher prevalence of both

163

Campylobacter and Salmonella, what could be explained by the poor conditions of the evisceration

164

process. On the other hand, no Salmonella and a lower Campylobacter prevalence were found in

165

slaughterhouses D and E. The occurrence of both Salmonella and Campylobacter in the same broiler

166

samples was also reported before (Franz, van der Fels-Klerx, Thissen, & van Asselt, 2012) and their

167

presence in this product is resultant of the contamination level and hygienic processing in poultry

168

raising sites, layers, hatcheries, chicken farms and slaughterhouses. In this study, the investigated

169

slaughterhouses were registered in State Inspection Service. In Brazil, there is a Pathogen Reduction

170

Program of Agriculture Ministry for detection of Salmonella sp. in broiler and turkey carcasses in

171

natura, involving all slaughterhouses registered in Federal Inspection Service, however, there is no

172

requirement for Campylobacter detection.

EP

AC C

173

TE D

161

We found in this study, Campylobacter more prevalent than Salmonella. Many previous

174

studies have found that chicken is more contaminated with Campylobacter compared to Salmonella

175

(Berghaus et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2015; Madden, Moran, Scates, McBride, & Kelly, 2011). The

176

variable prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella on poultry carcasses around the world can be

177

resultant of the type and number of samples, different methods of collection of samples, transport

178

conditions, laboratory methods, and different sanitary conditions on poultry farms and

179

slaughterhouses. 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT All Salmonella serotypes were sensitive to ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, however, all

181

Campylobacter isolates were resistant to these antibiotics by Disk Diffusion Method and Minimal

182

Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). A high-level resistance, substantiated by the values obtained at CIM,

183

ranging from ≥ 8 µg.mL-1 to ≤ 64 µg.mL-1 for enrofloxacin and from ≥ 16 µg.mL-1 to ≤ 128 µg.mL-1

184

for ciprofloxacin were observed. One C. jejuni and two C. coli strains had MIC = 64 µg/mL to

185

enrofloxacin, and one C. jejuni and three C. coli strains had MIC = 128 µg/mL to ciprofloxacin by the

186

agar dilution method (Table 3).

RI PT

180

Salmonella isolates in this study were sensitive to fluoroquinolones and although several

188

studies around the world have reported high prevalence of Salmonella resistant strains to

189

fluoroquinolones, no resistance was also observed in studies in Iran (Dallal et al., 2010), Spain

190

(Álvarez-Fernández, Alonso-Calleja, García-Fernández, & Capita, 2012) and USA (Berrang et al.,

191

2009). On the other hand, our findings revealed a high prevalence (100%) of fluoroquinolone-resistant

192

Campylobacter in chicken carcasses. Results from other studies performed in Brazil, also showed a

193

high C. jejuni - resistance rate of 100% and 95% to ciprofloxacin (de Moura et al., 2013; Hungaro et

194

al., 2015), respectively. In other countries, similar results were found such as in Korea (88%) (Kang et

195

al., 2006), South Africa (91%) (Bester & Essack, 2008), China (98%) (Chen et al., 2010), and Italy

196

(79%) (Nobile, Costantino, Bianco, Pileggi, & Pavia, 2013). Our study also revealed a high level of

197

resistance to the fluoroquinolones, since 77.27% of C. jejuni and 76.32% of C. coli had ciprofloxacin

198

MIC’s ≤ 64 µg.mL-1 and four strains (4.87%) had MIC’s ≤ 128 µg.mL-1. A lower level of resistance to

199

enrofloxacin was observed when compared to ciprofloxacin, since only one strain of C. jejuni (2.27%)

200

and two strains of C. coli (5.26%) had enrofloxacin MIC’s = 64 µg.mL-1.

TE D

M AN U

SC

187

Accordingly to Mayrhofer, Paulsen, Smulders, & Hilbert (2004), the lack of resistance by

202

Salmonella strains might originate from the function of the main target of the drugs, the DNA gyrase.

203

It might well be that in aerobically growing bacteria as Salmonella and E. coli, DNA gyrase has a

204

more important role to stabilize the helix structure, as the helix is less supercoiled than in

205

anaerobically or micro aerobically growing bacteria and that could explain why it is most common to

206

find high quinolones resistance in Campylobacter than in Salmonella. Furthermore, fluoroquinolone

207

treatment in Campylobacter rapidly selects high levels of resistance and a single point mutation in the

208

gyrA gene is sufficient to confer high level of fluoroquinolone resistance (McDermott et al., 2002).

209

This appears to be a characteristic of Campylobacter, since in the results reported by van Boven,

210

Veldman, Jong, & Mevius (2003) the treatment with fluoroquinolones could reduce the presence of

211

Escherichia coli below the level of detection and do not induced resistance in this organism.

AC C

EP

201

212

Although fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter has already been well reported, the high

213

level and prevalence of resistance found in this study appear to be among the most alarming. This is a

214

concerning situation once fluoquinolone-resistant Campylobacter become dominant in poultry even in

215

the absence of selection pressure (Luo et al., 2005) and only ban the use of it in poultry production

216

would be inefficient. This enhances the potential role of raw chicken carcasses in the circulation of 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 217

resistant Campylobacter strains in humans in Brazil, and demands more careful attention on antibiotics

218

use in the animal production. In countries where fluoroquinolones are not accepted to use in poultry

219

production, no ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin resistant Campylobacter were isolated from poultry,

220

such as in Australia and Norway (Miflin, Templeton, & Blackall, 2007; Norström et al., 2006). Fluoroquinolones are not labelled for use as growth promotion in Brazil. However,

222

enrofloxacin is routinely used in poultry production for preventive and therapeutic purposes and might

223

represent one potential source of pollution to the environment, enhancing fluoroquinolone resistance.

224

Leal, Figueira, Tornisielo, & Regitano (2012) evaluated sorption–desorption and occurrence of

225

commonly used fluoroquinolones in poultry litter and soil samples from São Paulo state in Brazil and

226

found enrofloxacin as the most often detected compound, present in 30% of poultry litters and in 27%

227

of soils at the highest mean concentrations.

SC

228

RI PT

221

4. Conclusions

Besides the presence of Salmonella, this study reveals a significant contamination of chicken

230

carcasses with fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in Rio de Janeiro state. These data may draw

231

the attention about the widespread use of fluoroquinolones at poultry production in Brazil and alert

232

veterinary services about these enteric bacteria in chicken products in order to avoid their occurrence

233

at the poultry farming and to improve the hygiene practices at the slaughter.

M AN U

229

234

236

Acknowledgments

TE D

235

We wish to thank Dr. Dalia Rodrigues (FIOCRUZ) for Salmonella serotyping. This study was supported by a grant from the CAPES for post-graduation program in Brazil.

238

References

239

Aabo, S., Rasmussen, O. F., Roseen, L., Sørensen, P. D., & Olsen, J. E. (1993). Salmonella

240

identification by the polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 7(3), 171–

241

178. http://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1993.1026

AC C

EP

237

242

Agunos, A., Léger, D., Avery, B. P., Parmley, E. J., Deckert, A., Carson, C. A., & Dutil, L. (2013).

243

Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Retail Chicken, Western Canada. Emerging

244

Infectious Diseases, 19(7), 1121–1124. http://doi.org/10.3201/eid1907.111417

245

Álvarez-Fernández, E., Alonso-Calleja, C., García-Fernández, C., & Capita, R. (2012). Prevalence and

246

antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serotypes isolated from poultry in Spain: Comparison

247

between 1993 and 2006. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 153(3), 281–287.

248

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.011 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 249

Aquino, M. H. C., Pacheco, A. P. G., Ferreira, M. C. S., & Tibana, A. (2002). Frequency of Isolation

250

and Identification of Thermophilic Campylobacters from Animals in Brazil. The Veterinary

251

Journal, 164(2), 159–161. http://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2001.0698 Berghaus, R. D., Thayer, S. G., Law, B. F., Mild, R. M., Hofacre, C. L., & Singer, R. S. (2013).

253

Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in Environmental Farm Samples and

254

Processing Plant Carcass Rinses from Commercial Broiler Chicken Flocks. Applied and

255

Environmental Microbiology, 79(13), 4106–4114. http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00836-13

RI PT

252

Berrang, M. E., Bailey, J. S., Altekruse, S. F., Shaw, W. K., Patel, B. L., Meinersmann, R. J., &

257

Fedorka-Cray, P. J. (2009). Prevalence, Serotype, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella

258

on Broiler Carcasses Postpick and Postchill in 20 U.S. Processing Plants. Journal of Food

259

Protection, 72(8), 1610–1615.

M AN U

SC

256

260

Bester, L. A., & Essack, S. Y. (2008). Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter isolates

261

from commercial poultry suppliers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Antimicrobial

262

Chemotherapy, 62(6), 1298–1300. http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn408 Cardoso, A., & Tessari, E. (2008). Salmonela na segurança dos alimentos. Biológico, 70, 11–13.

264

Cheng, A. C., Turnidge, J., Collignon, P., Looke, D., Barton, M., & Gottlieb, T. (2012). Control of

265

Fluoroquinolone Resistance through Successful Regulation, Australia. Emerging Infectious

266

Diseases, 18(9), 1453–1460. http://doi.org/10.3201/eid1809.111515

EP

TE D

263

Chen, X., Naren, G.-W., Wu, C.-M., Wang, Y., Dai, L., Xia, L.-N., Shen, J.-Z. (2010). Prevalence and

268

antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates in broilers from China. Veterinary

269

AC C

267

Microbiology, 144(1-2), 133–139. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.035

270

CLSI. (2008). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for

271

Bacteria Isolated From Animals; Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M31-A3. Wayne,

272

PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

273

Dallal, M. M. S., Doyle, M. P., Rezadehbashi, M., Dabiri, H., Sanaei, M., Modarresi, S., Sharifi-

274

Yazdi, M. K. (2010). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella serotypes,

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 275

Campylobacter and Yersinia spp. isolated from retail chicken and beef, Tehran, Iran. Food

276

Control, 21(4), 388–392. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.06.001

277

de Moura, H. M., Silva, P. R., da Silva, P. H. C., Souza, N. R., Racanicci, A. M. C., & Santana, Â. P.

278

(2013). Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Chicken Carcasses in

279

the

280

http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-485

District,

Brazil.

Journal

of

Food

Protection,

76(4),

691–693.

RI PT

Federal

Donado-Godoy, P., Clavijo, V., León, M., Tafur, M. A., Gonzales, S., Hume, M., Doyle, M. P. (2012).

282

Prevalence of Salmonella on Retail Broiler Chicken Meat Carcasses in Colombia. Journal of

283

Food Protection, 75(6), 1134–1138. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-513

SC

281

Duarte, D. A. M., Ribeiro, A. R., Vasconcelos, A. M. M., Santos, S. B., Silva, J. V. D., de Andrade, P.

285

L. A., & de Arruda Falcão, L. S. P. da C. (2009). Occurrence of Salmonella spp. in broiler

286

chicken carcasses and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Brazilian Journal of

287

Microbiology, 40(3), 569–573. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822009000300

M AN U

284

EFSA. (2013). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic

289

Agents and Food-borne Outbreaks in 2011 (No. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3129) (p. 250). EFSA

290

Journal 2013;11(4):3129. Retrieved from www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal

291

TE D

288

FAO/WHO. (2009). Salmonella and campylobacter in chicken meat. Microbiological risk assessment series

19,

meeting

report.

World

Health

293

http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/mra19/en/

Organization.

Retrieved

from

EP

292

Finley, R. L., Collignon, P., Larsson, D. G. J., McEwen, S. A., Li, X.-Z., Gaze, W. H., Topp, E.

295

(2013). The Scourge of Antibiotic Resistance: The Important Role of the Environment.

296

AC C

294

Clinical Infectious Diseases, cit355. http://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit355

297

Franz, E., van der Fels-Klerx, H. J., Thissen, J., & van Asselt, E. D. (2012). Farm and slaughterhouse

298

characteristics affecting the occurrence of Salmonella and Campylobacter in the broiler supply

299

chain. Poultry Science, 91(9), 2376–2381. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00367

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 300

Fuzihara, T. O., Fernandes, S. A., & Franco, B. D. (2000). Prevalence and dissemination of

301

Salmonella serotypes along the slaughtering process in Brazilian small poultry

302

slaughterhouses. Journal of Food Protection, 63(12), 1749–1753. Garin, B., Gouali, M., Wouafo, M., Perchec, A.-M., Thu, P. M., Ravaonindrina, N., Pouillot, R.

304

(2012). Prevalence, quantification and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. on

305

chicken neck-skins at points of slaughter in 5 major cities located on 4 continents.

306

International

307

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.020

of

Food

Microbiology,

157(1),

102–107.

SC

Journal

RI PT

303

GraphPad. (2009). InStat 3.0 User’s Guide. San Diego, CA: GraphPad Software Inc.

309

Hammack, T., Andrews, W. H., & Jacobson, A. (2014). USFDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual Retrieved

M AN U

308

310

[WebContent].

June

11,

2015,

from

311

http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm070149.htm#Prep Harmon, K. M., Ransom, G. M., & Wesley, I. V. (1997). Differentiation of Campylobacter

313

jejuniandCampylobacter coliby polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes,

314

11(3), 195–200. http://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1997.0104

TE D

312

Hendriksen, R. S., Vieira, A. R., Karlsmose, S., Fo Wong, D. M. A. Lo, Jensen, A. B., Wegener, H.

316

C., & Aarestrup, F. M. (2011). Global Monitoring of Salmonella Serovar Distribution from

317

the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank:

318

Results of Quality Assured Laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathogens and

319

Disease, 8(8), 887–900. http://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0787

AC C

EP

315

320

Huang, J., Zong, Q., Zhao, F., Zhu, J., & Jiao, X. (2015). Quantitative surveys of Salmonella and

321

Campylobacter on retail raw chicken in Yangzhou, China. Food Control, 59, 68–73.

322

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.009

323

Hungaro, H. M., Mendonça, R. C. S., Rosa, V. O., Badaró, A. C. L., Moreira, M. A. S., & Chaves, J.

324

B. P. (2015). Low contamination of Campylobacter spp. on chicken carcasses in Minas Gerais

325

state, Brazil: Molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance. Food Control, 51, 15–

326

22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.11.001 10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 327

Hur, J., Jawale, C., & Lee, J. H. (2012). Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from food

328

animals:

A

review.

Food

Research

329

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.014

International,

45(2),

819–830.

Idowu, O. R., Peggins, J. O., Cullison, R., & Bredow, J. von. (2010). Comparative pharmacokinetics

331

of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in lactating dairy cows and beef steers following

332

intravenous administration of enrofloxacin. Research in Veterinary Science, 89(2), 230–235.

333

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.12.019

RI PT

330

Kang, Y.-S., Cho, Y.-S., Yoon, S.-K., Yu, M.-A., Kim, C.-M., Lee, J.-O., & Pyun, Y.-R. (2006).

335

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

336

Isolated from Raw Chicken Meat and Human Stools in Korea. Journal of Food Protection,

337

69(12), 2915–2923.

M AN U

SC

334

Lay, K. S., Vuthy, Y., Song, P., Phol, K., & Sarthou, J. L. (2011). Prevalence, numbers and

339

antimicrobial susceptibilities of Salmonella serovars and Campylobacter spp. in retail poultry

340

in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science / the Japanese Society

341

of Veterinary Science, 73(3), 325–329.

TE D

338

Leal, R. M. P., Figueira, R. F., Tornisielo, V. L., & Regitano, J. B. (2012). Occurrence and sorption of

343

fluoroquinolones in poultry litters and soils from São Paulo State, Brazil. Science of The Total

344

Environment, 432, 344–349. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.002

EP

342

Luo, N., Pereira, S., Sahin, O., Lin, J., Huang, S., Michel, L., & Zhang, Q. (2005). Enhanced in vivo

346

fitness of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in the absence of antibiotic selection

347 348

AC C

345

pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,

102(3), 541–546. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408966102

349

Madden, R. H., Moran, L., Scates, P., McBride, J., & Kelly, C. (2011). Prevalence of Campylobacter

350

and Salmonella in Raw Chicken on Retail Sale in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Food

351

Protection, 74(11), 1912–1916. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-104

352

Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011). Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health.

353

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 24(4), 718–733. http://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00002-11 11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 354

Matheus, D. P., Rudge, A. C., & Gomes, S. M. M. (2003). Ocorrência de Salmonella spp em carne de

355

frango comercializada no municípion de Bauru, SP, Brasil. Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz, 62(2), 111–

356

115. Mayrhofer, S., Paulsen, P., Smulders, F. J. M., & Hilbert, F. (2004). Antimicrobial resistance profile

358

of five major food-borne pathogens isolated from beef, pork and poultry. International

359

Journal of Food Microbiology, 97(1), 23–29. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.04.006

360

McDermott, P. F., Bodeis, S. M., English, L. L., White, D. G., Walker, R. D., Zhao, S., Wagner, D. D.

361

(2002). Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Evolves Rapidly in Chickens

362

Treated with Fluoroquinolones. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 185(6), 837–840.

363

http://doi.org/10.1086/339195

M AN U

SC

RI PT

357

364

Miflin, J. K., Templeton, J. M., & Blackall, P. J. (2007). Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni

365

and Campylobacter coli isolated from poultry in the South-East Queensland region. Journal of

366

Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 59(4), 775–778. http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm024 Myint, M. S., Johnson, Y. J., Tablante, N. L., & Heckert, R. A. (2006). The effect of pre-enrichment

368

protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated

369

Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture. Food Microbiology, 23(6), 599–

370

604. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.09.002

372

NCCLS. (2003). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Test for

EP

371

TE D

367

Bacteria Isolates from Animal (Approved Standard, 2nd ed., M31-A2). Wayne, PA. Nobile, C. G. A., Costantino, R., Bianco, A., Pileggi, C., & Pavia, M. (2013). Prevalence and pattern

374

of antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter spp. in poultry meat in Southern Italy. Food Control,

375

AC C

373

32(2), 715–718. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.011

376

Norström, M., Hofshagen, M., Stavnes, T., Schau, J., Lassen, J., & Kruse, H. (2006). Antimicrobial

377

resistance in Campylobacter jejuni from humans and broilers in Norway. Epidemiology &

378

Infection, 134(01), 127–130. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268805004814

379

Oliveira, W. F., Cardoso, W. M., Salles, R. P. R., Romão, J. M., Teixeira, R. S. C., Câmara, S. R., …

380

Marques, L. C. L. (2006). Initial identification and sensitivity to antimicrobial agents of 12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Salmonella sp.isolated from poultry products in the state of Ceara, Brazil. Revista Brasileira

382

de Ciência Avícola, 8(3), 193–199. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000300010

383

Ruiz, J. (2003). Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation

384

and DNA gyrase protection. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 51(5), 1109–1117.

385

http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg222

RI PT

381

Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Griffin, P.

387

M. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect

388

Dis, 17(7).

SC

386

Stern, N. ., Patton, C. ., Doyle, M. ., Park, C. ., & Mccardell, B. (1992). Campylobacter. In

390

Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. (pp. 475–489).

391

Washington DC: C. Vanderzant & D. F. Splittstoesser - American Society for Microbiology.

M AN U

389

392

Ta, Y. T., Nguyen, T. T., To, P. B., Pham, D. X., Le, H. T. H., Alali, W. Q., Doyle, M. P. (2012).

393

Prevalence of Salmonella on Chicken Carcasses from Retail Markets in Vietnam. Journal of

394

Food Protection, 75(10), 1851–1854. http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-130 Ta, Y. T., Nguyen, T. T., To, P. B., Pham, D. X., Le, H. T. H., Thi, G. N., Doyle, M. P. (2014).

396

Quantification, Serovars, and Antibiotic Resistance of Salmonella Isolated from Retail Raw

397

Chicken

398

http://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-221

in

Vietnam.

Journal

of

Food

Protection,

77(1),

57–66.

EP

Meat

TE D

395

Thrusfield, M. (2007). Veterinary Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Scotland, UK: Wiley.

400

van Boven, M., Veldman, K. T., Jong, M. C. M. de, & Mevius, D. J. (2003). Rapid selection of

401

quinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni but not in Escherichia coli in individually

402 403 404

AC C

399

housed

broilers.

Journal

of

Antimicrobial

Chemotherapy,

52(4),

719–723.

http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg402

Wang, J., Guo, Y. C., & Li, N. (2013). Prevalence and Risk Assessment of Campylobacter jejuni in

405

Chicken

in

China.

Biomedical

and

406

http://doi.org/10.3967/0895-3988.2013.04.002

13

Environmental

Sciences,

26(4),

243–248.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 407

Yan, H., Wang, H., Qin, X., Liu, B., & Du, J. (2011). Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid

408

microextraction for determination of fluoroquinolones in pharmaceutical wastewater. Journal

409

of

410

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.08.007

Pharmaceutical

and

Biomedical

Analysis,

54(1),

53–57.

Zaidi, M. B., Calva, J. J., Estrada-Garcia, M. T., Leon, V., Vazquez, G., Figueroa, G., Tollefson, L.

412

(2008). Integrated Food Chain Surveillance System for Salmonella spp. in Mexico. Emerging

413

Infectious Diseases, 14(3), 429–435. http://doi.org/10.3201/eid1403.071057

RI PT

411

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

414

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1 Total prevalence, PCR detection and serotype identification of Salmonella isolated from chicken carcasses slaughtered in State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Sample identification

Serotype

PCR detection

A

-

Not isolated

Negative

11

S. Typhimurium

12

S Albany

14

S Albany

C

-

Not isolated

D

-

Not isolated

Negative

E

-

Not isolated

Negative

51

F

52

Salmonella spp. Salmonella spp. Negative

Not isolated

Salmonella spp.

S. Typhimurium

Salmonella spp.

4 (6.67)

5 (8.33)

TE D

Total (%)

Table 2

Salmonella spp.

SC

M AN U

B

RI PT

Slaughterhouse

Campylobacter prevalence and distribution among chicken carcasses slaughtered in State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Contaminated chicken carcass (%)

C. jejuni (%)

C. coli (%)

Total

A

3 (30%)

11 (13.41%)

Not isolated

11

7 (70%)

06 (7.32%)

17 (20.73%)

23

6 (60%)

01 (1.22%)

18 (21.95%)

19

D

2 (20%)

03 (3.66%)

Not isolated

03

E

1 (10%)

01 (1.22%)

01 (1.22%)

02

F

8 (80%)

22 (26.83%)

02 (2.44%)

24

Total

27 (45%)

44 (53.66%)

38 (46.34%)

82

B

AC C

C

EP

Slaughterhouse

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3 Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin resistance level of Campylobacter isolates by Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) tested. Enrofloxacin

64 µg/mL

32 µg/mL

16 µg/mL

C. jejuni 44 (100%) C. coli 38 (100%)

01 (2.27%)

01 (2.27%)

15 (34.09%)

02 (5.26%)

05 (13.16%)

18 (47.37%)

8 µg/mL

4 µg/mL

41 (93.18%)

44 (100%)

32 (84.21%)

38 (100%)

SC

Species (n) (%)

RI PT

Dilutions

Ciprofloxacin

M AN U

Dilutions 128 µg/mL

64 µg/mL

32 µg/mL

16 µg/mL

8 µg/mL

C. jejuni 44 (100%) C. coli 38 (100%)

01 (2.27%)

34 (77.27%)

42 (95.45%)

42 (95.45%)

44 (100%)

03 (7.89%)

29 (76.32%)

30 (78.95%)

32 (84.21%)

38 (100%)

AC C

EP

TE D

Species (n) (%)

2