Vol. 98, No. 3,198l February
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS Pages 875-883
12, 1981
PROTAMINE--A
POTENT INHIBITOR OF VESICULAR STOMATITIS VIRUS TRANSCRIPTASE --IN VITRO Sohel
Roche
Received
December
Talib
and Amiya
K. Banerjee
Department of Cell Biology Institute of Molecular Biology Nutley, New Jersey 07110
11,198O SUMMARY
stomatitis virus The virion-associated RNA polymerase activity of ves&yular is inhibited by protamine at a concentration as low as 10 M. The inhibition is reversible, appears to be at the level of initiation and competitive with respect to ATP. Histone IIA and IV are also inhibitory whereas other fractions The endogenous protein kinase activity is significantly inhibited by are not. Virion-associated RNA or DNA polymerases of several animal viruses protamine. are also inhibited by protamine. INTRODUCTION The transcribing (VSV)
contains
negative
a single-stranded
polarity
two other species
tightly
minor are
reaction
ribonucleoprotein
sequentially the
of replication,
transcription
to replication
the
triphosphates. control
with
in vitro been
analogue These
also
shown
L protein (4).
synthesized
--in vitro
results --in vitro.
It
to be present
that
has been
NS proteins in the purified
are with
Under
three
(3).
normal
that
appropriate
different
degrees differential
required
switch
from
the presence
of
ribonucleoside of proteins
the phosphorylated
components
with
mRNA
of Triton-disrupted
states
necessary
virion
This
in
phosphorylated shown
(N),
genome RNA, the
incubation
and the
protein
distinct
by preinitiation
of REP and then
suggested
(2).
--in vitro
was achieved
and RNP template
Moreover,
Five
of the
virus
4 x 1D6) of
nucleocapsid
NS (1).
strand
of ATP (AdoPP(NH)P)
transcription
along
is
ATP and CTP, reisolation
B,y imido
the principal
positive
stomatitis
weight,
by the RNP --in vitro
full-length
intermediate
VSV with
with
L and the phosphoprotein
synthesized
of vesicular
genome RNA (molecular
associated
proteins
conditions
(RNP) core
for
may
NS protein
transcription
of phosphorylation affinity
have for
the
0006-291X/81/030875-09$01.00/0 875
Copyright 0 1981 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproducfion in any form reserved.
Vol. 98, No. 3,198l
BIOCHEMICAL
Purified
RNP (5,6). predominantly
RNP also
the NS protein
in the multiplication stand tion
the
role
transcription
that
a low molecular
polypeptide
from
a potent
trout
inhibitor
activity the effect
activity
that
and also
of the virion-associated
basic
acceptor
RNA polymerase
MATERIALS
acceptor
proteins
we demonstrate
highly
a phosphate
to under-
of phosphoryla-
phosphate
communication
daltons)
kinase
In an effort
of various
(5000
phosphorylates
of the protein
unclear.
In this
weight (9)
kinase
COMMUNICATIONS
in VSV and the processes
process.
testis
RESEARCH
The role
(7,8). is presently
studied
in the --in vitro protamine,
a protein
--in vitro
kinase
we have
in general,
contains
of the virus
of protein
AND BIOPHYSICAL
arginine-rich
protein
(lo),
is
of VSV.
& METHODS
In vitro transcription assay: VSV RNA polymerase reactions (0.2 ml) --In vitro 4 mM dithioth?jeitol, contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 M NaCl, 5 mM MgCl 0.05% Triton NlOl, 1 mM each of ATP, CT32 and GTP, 0.1 m&'HTP and 10 nc H UTP (specific activity = 660 cpmfpmole), a- P LJTP (1.8 Ci/mmole) and 10 to 15 ng of purified VSV (Indiana serotype grown in baby hamster kidney cells - 21, clone 13 adapted to suspension culture) (11). The incubations were at 30°C for desired lengths of time as described in legends. RNA synthesis by --In vitro purified vaccinia virus (kindly provided by Dr. J. Hurwitz), cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (kindly provided by Dr. Y. Furuichi), WSN strain of influenza virus (kindly provided by Dr. R. M. Krug), and reovirus (kindly provided by Dr. A. J. Shatkin) were done under standard conditions as described in references 12, 13, 14 and 15, respectively. Reverse transcriptase activity of Rous sarcoma virus (kindly provided by Dr. A. M. Skalka) was determined using standard assay conditions virus used was approximately lo-15 ug, (16). In each case the amount of purified except for Rous sarcoma virus 100 ug was used. The incubation time was 2 hrs. Protamine, casein, and phosvitin were purchased from Sigma Chemicals and different fractions of histones were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. In vitro protein kinase Tria-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 ATP (final-specific Y- “P Incubation was at 30°C according to the method gel electrophoresis as
assay: The reaction mixture (0.2 ml) contained 50 mM M NaCl, 5 mM M&l,.. 4 mM dithiothreitol. 50 uM ATP. and activity = 4006.cpm/pmole) and 50 ug-of purified RNP. for 15 min. The phosphorylated proteins were processed of Moyer and Summers (8) and analyzed by polyacrylamide described (10).
RESULTS --In vitro various
RNA synthesis
concentrations
RNA synthesis corresponds
of protamine.
was achieved to a molarity
the RNA synthesis
by purified
RNP was carried As shown
at a protamine
concentration
of approximately
was virtually
in Fig.
lo-'.
abolished.
IA,
in the presence a 50% inhibition
of 0.45
At concentrations
The inhibitory
876
out
effect
rig/ml
of of
which
of 1 ug/ml of protamine
Vol. 98, No. 3,1981
BIOCHEMICAL
PROTAMINE
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
TIME (mid
(pg /ml 1
Fig. 1. Inhibition of --in vitro transcription by protamine. (A) Standard transcr f ption reaction mixtures were set up as described in Materials and Methods using [ H] UTP as the labeled precursor. Protyine was added at different concentrations and trichloroacetic acid insoluble H radioactivity was measured (B) In separate standard transcripusing toluene based scinttilation cocktail. tion reaction mixtures i rig/ml of protamine was added at different times during RNA synthesis as indicated by arrows. The RNA synthesis was then followed by taking aliquots (20 ~1) from the reaction mixtures at different times and assaying for trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity.
was quite (Fig. it
striking
1B).
when added
Although
the
can be seen in Fig.
5 to 10%) continued inhibition
at the
RNA chains
were
We next,
amounts
1B that
indicate
level
in Fig.
gradient. reversible,
In order
the
kinetic
the
of the
inhibition
effect
experiment
the
amount
with
the
are
where
previously
inhibitor
characteristic
typical
might
of initiated
although rates.
RNA products
found
were
decreased These
the
effect
have been
preparation.
may be at or near
inhibitory
was performed.
877
of protamine
of RNA (approximately
patterns
the mRNA products
terminated
whether
the addition
inhibitor.
of protamine
no prematurely
of transcription
of RNA synthesis
that
and sedimented
onset
after
reproducible
These
indicate
to determine
following
rapidly
by RNase contaminating
2 clearly
since
after
of RNA synthesis
whether
the inhibitory
the
but
in the presence
undegraded
of RNA synthesis
a small
of initiation
determined
that
ceased
to be synthesized.
completed
remained
times
RNA synthesis
due to degradationofmRNA Data shown
at different
RNA synthesis
resuits
initiation
of protamine --in vitro
in
in the was was
Vol. 98, No. 3,1981
BIOCHEMICAL
FRACTION
02
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
NUMBER
FRACTION
COMMUNICATIONS
NUMBER
Fig.
2. Velocity sedimentation analyses of VSV mP.NA synthesis in the presence of varying concentrations of protamine. Standard transcription reacgion mixtures containing different concentrations of protamine were set up using [ HI-UTP as the labeled precursor and incubated for 2 hr at 3O'C. The reaction was terminated by addition of SDS and the reaction mixtures were directly layered onto a 15-30X SDS-sucrose gradient. The centrifugation was at 33,000 rpm for 17 hr at 23'C in a SW40 Spinco Rotor. Fractions (40 drops) were collected from the bottom of the tubes and trichloroacetic acid insoluble radioactivity measured. $4, no protamine; A-A, 0.5 pg/ml protamine; O-O, 0.75 pg/ml protamine; A-A, 1.00 pg/ml protamine. Arrows indicate the sedimentation position of VSV mRNA speices. Fig.
3.
Reversibility
of protamine
inhibition
of VSV RNA synthesis.
Two transcription assay mixtures were set up in 0.02 ml in the presence of protamine (1 ug/ml) containing unlabeled precursors and incubated for 15 min. The first sample was diluted to 0.2 ml while maintainjng the concentrations of the reaction components including protamine (1 rig/ml). H UTP was added and the reaction continued for 45 min (O-O). The second sample was similarly diluted and incubated while reducing protamine concentration at 0.1 pg/ml (A-A). A third sample (0.02 ml) initially received low protamine (0.1 ug/ml) after 15 min was similarly diluted maintaining protamine concentration at 0.1 rig/ml (A--I). RNA synthesized by three samples were individually analyzed by velocity gradient as described in Fig. 2.
carried
out
in duplicate
In one of the while
synthesized
the reaction These
results
containing indicate
that
of the
by velocity
ugfml the
components
sedimentation.
of protamine
activity present
effect
878
for
was reduced of reaction
45 min following
RNA synthetic
inhibitory
(1 us/ml)
concentration
an additional
regained 0.1
of protamine
the protamine
for
RNA was analyzed mixture
the presence
of the rest
was continued
reaction
in
mixtures
the concentrations
The reaction
diluted
reaction
tubes
virtually
3, the
identical
is
totally
unchanged.
and the
in Fig.
at the beginning
of protamine
ten-fold
remained
reduction
As shown
15 min.
to
of the
reaction.
reversible.
Vol. 98, No. 3,198l
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
0.5
I.0
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
2.cI
NTP MA)
Pig. 4. Synthesis of VSV mRNA in the presence of protamine at varying ATP and GTP concentrations. Standard transcription r3action mixtures were set up as described in the Materials and Methods using [ H] UTP as the labeled precursor excepting that ATP and GTP concentrations were varied between 0.1 n&f to 2.0 &I and 0.5 pgfml of protamine was used. The RNA synthesis after 2 hr incubation were determined by trichloroacetic acid insoluble radioactivity. ATT, A-A; ATP + protamine, A--d; Cl?, O--O; Gl'P + protamine, 0-O.
The mechanism by varying
the
reaction
of protamine.
experiments
protective
(not
effect
a competitive Since
is
basic
We also
polymerases
with
proteins
of several
proteins
such as phosvitin
of vsv.
Interestingly,
significantly
Similar
inhibitory
was observed
was shown These
basic
the effect animal
effects
in vaccinia
for
protein,
viruses.
transcription reversed
to 2 mM.
UTP nor
suggest
that
the
In
CTP had a
protamine
it
was of interest
acceptor
proteins
may be
histone that
the observed
on VSV RNA polymerase
As shown
1, neutral
in Table
on --in vitro
proteins,
only
the basicity
and histone
IIA
transcription IIA
and IV were
of a protein
effect
polyhedrosis
879
the
on the virion-associated
inhibitory
cytoplasmic
to study
same proteins
have no effect
indicates
of protamine virus,
of 0.1
neither
results
of the
and casein
This
the
of GTP, had virtually
range that
was studied
to ATP only.
among the basic
criterion
addition
and phosphate
other
inhibitory.
absolute
it
in
of ATP effectively
concentration
respect
a highly
studied
4, addition
the
to ATP.
inhibitor
of other
over
by protamine
triphosphates
In contrast,
shown)
similar
protamine
--in vitro.
be the
in Fig.
on RNA synthesis
similar
effect
of ribonucleoside
As shown
effect
no effect
of VSV RNA polymerase
concentration
mixture.
inhibitory
of inhibition
of protamine.
on --in vitro virus,
may not
RNA synthesis
influenza
virus,
Vol. 98, No. 3,198l
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
TABLE1 Effect
of some basic
and neutral proteins several animal
on virion-associated viruses.
polymerases
Of Proteins Required For 50% Inhibition (M/ml) Protamine Histone Phosvltin
of
Concentration Viruses
I
IIA
IIB
0.5
(-)
2
(-)
1
(-)
1
C-1
1
C-1
10
virus
1
(-)
Rous sarcoma virus
5
N.D
C-1
C-1
vsv Vaccinia
Virus
Influenza
Virus
Cytoplasmic Polyhedrosis
Reo virus
IV (-)
C-1
(-)
(-)
C-1
C-1
(-)
C-1
C-1
10
C-1
(-)
C-1
N.D
N.D
N.0
N.D
N.D
t-1
C-1
C-1
C-1
C-1
10
The --in vitro transcription of the viruses were carried conditions as described in Materials and Methods. N.D denotes not determined; (-) denotes no effect.
and the reverse where
no protein Finally,
kinase
we studied using
little,
if
at all.
contamination a residual
of protamine abolished
(Fig.
the L protein
this
labeled protein
1).
donor
of the NS protein
of the L protein
in purified
It
band migrated band has not
RNP.
of the NS protein the --in vitro
(20%)
had no effect
concentrations
tested.
slightly been
faster
characterized.
880
than
is
interesting
remained
on the It
very due to
to note
even at 1 ug/ml was virtually phosphorylation
was also
NS protein
at protamine
was possibly
transcription
protamine
5, significant
was inhibited
of
at the various
the phosphorylated
was observed
M protein
Moreover,
protein
and analyzed
of phosphorylated
concentration
was reovirus
--in vitro.
The appearance
phosphorylation at which
The exception
As shown in Fig.
Phosphorylation
the protein
standard
on the endogenous
electrophoresis. (80%)
of 0.5 pg/ml.
of protamine
as the phosphate
gel
of phosphorylation
concentration
second
y-32 P-ATP
out under
virus.
on RNA transcription
the effect
by polyacrylamide
inhibition
trace
of Rous sarcoma
had any effect
activity
proteins
that
transcription
Casein
observed
(lanes
of that
B, C, & D);
a
Vol. 98, No. 3,198l
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
A
BIOPHYSICAL
B
RESEARCH
C
COMMUNICATIONS
D
5. Effect of protamine on the endogenous protein kinase activity. VSV cores (50 up) were incubated In the complete reactiog2mixture (0.2 ml) at varying with 50 UM ATP and [y P] ATP (final specific activity = protamine concentrations 4000 cpm/pmole) for 15 min at 30°c. The samples were precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid containing 1 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA. The precipitated proteins were treated with 0.1 N NaOH in the cold for 1 min, reprecipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid washed, solubilized, and analyzed by 10% polyacrylamide slab gel as described (8). Autoradiogram of the gel was made using Kodak SB5 film. A - without protamine, B - 0.25 ug/ml protamine; C - 0.5 ug/ml protamine; D - 1 ug/ml protamine. Fig.
DISCUSSION In this highly
conrmunication
basic
activity
of purified
ATP in
either
by dilution
the
inhibitors
polymerase.
which
3) or by adding
(Fig.
4).
Of the
the
interaction
of the viral
and ARA-ATP
nucleotide that
Since
In the
protamine inhibitory with
RNA polymerase
for
appears
which
effect the viral
binds is
at
protamine been
protein(s)
proteins
(L,
881
shown
of behaves
to be
of VSV (17). --in vitro
(18),
the initiation
reversible
can be
concentrations
RNA transcription
VSV RNA synthesis
possibly
effect
respect
have also
was achieved
to be at the
increasing
latter
weight
RNA polymerase
of RNA synthesis
The inhibitory
1).
(Fig.
of ATP in --in vitro
initiating
Seem to indicate
(Fig.
a low molecular
the viron-associated
The inhibition
as lo-'M.
to phosphonoformate
competitive
nature
mixture
protamine,
A 50% inhibition
of RNA synthesis
the reaction
similarly
ATP is
of as low
that
inhibit
VSV --in vitro.
of initiation
reversed
shown
can effectively
protein,
at a concentration level
we have
it
site
appears
is weak.
NS, or N (1))
It binds
Since
the results of the
that is not
RNA
the known
to protamine.
Vol. 98, No. $1981 The NS protein
appears
and protamine NS protein
band 4) is
(19)
and
phosphorylation
is more sensitive
of the
full-length
results
suggest
that
the primary
and not
the replicase.
Isolation
will
be important
transcription
it
seems that
regions
that
interact
with
RNA or DNA synthesis associated (Table
1).
interaction
histone
work
histone
of protamine
specific
stimulated
polyribonucleotide-directed leukemia
on the role
VSV in particular
virus
(20).
There
of these
Further
fractions also
viruses
that
viruses
if in
than
These
transcriptase
histone (Table
1).
shown protamine
inhibits
contain
virionprotein
is mediated or by inhibition
this
IIA
some specific
that
however,
along
in viral
only
an endogenous
proteins
any,
the -in
may contain
inhibition
one report,
studies
--in vitro
proteins
that
synthesis line
will
kinase by the of the
showed
polydeoxyribonucleotide
of phosphorylation, and animal
is
viral
of
inhibition
shown).
may be the
and in some cases
with
to the
VSV transcription
this
the
inhibition
that
not
to note
animal
show whether
kinase.
(data
We have
will
protein
light
or these
by several
endogenous
murine
inhibit
RNA or DNA polymerases
Whether
is
of the protamine-binding
interesting
proteins
as NSl
by protamine
by protamine
(3)
the role
VSV proteins.
--in vitro
Further
is
designated
observed
and characterizaton
It
conditions
related
of protamine
to understand
protamine
recently
strand
target
inhibitory
inhibited
to inhibition
plus
and replication.
and IV among the basic Thus,
We have
phosphorylates
the additional
of NS protein,
directly
a phosphoprote
(a)
as NS2 (19). is
is that
whether
is not
by protamine
COMMUNICATIONS
it
activity
under
component that
because
clear
phosphorylation
unclear.
RESEARCH
kinase
not yet
of NS, designated
is also
mRNA synthesis
protein,
is
NS protein
of NS protein
synthesis
protein
phosphorylated
form
of transcription
vitro
It
during
the residual
hyperphosphorylated
capped
5).
appears
the lesser
(b)
BIOPHYSICAL attractive
the endogenous (Fig.
that
AND
to be particularly
inhibits --in vitro
protein (Fig.
BIOCHEMICAL
histones by
shed some
on transcription/replication
of
general.
REFERENCES 1. 2.
Wagner, R. R. (1975) in Comprehensive Virology R. R. Wagner, eds. (New York: Plenum Press), Moyer, S. A. and Banerjee, A. K. (1975) Cell&,
882
4, H. Fraenkel-Conrat pp. l-80. 37-43.
and
in
Vol. 98, No. 3,198l
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
A. K. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Testa, D., Chanda, P. K. and Banerjee, 77, 294-298. S. U. and Yu, Y. H. (1975) J. Virol. l5, 1348-1356. Emerson, Clinton, G. M., Burge, B. W. and Huang, A. S. (1978) J. Virol. 7, 340-346. Kingsford, L. and Emerson, S. U. (1980) J. Virol. 33, 1097-1105. Inblum, R. L., and Wagner, R. R. (1974) J. Virol. l3, 113-124. Moyer, S. A., and Summers, D. F. (1974) J. Virol. 13, 455-465. Ando, T., and Watanabe, S. (1969) Int. J. Protein Res. 1, 221-224. Roux, L. and Kolakofsky, D. (1974) J. Virol. 13, 545-547. Banerjee, A. K., Moyer, S. A. and Rhodes, D. P. (1974) Virology 61, 547-558. Spencer, E., Shuman, S., and Hurwitz, J. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 5388-5359. Smith, R. E., and Furuichi, Y. (1980) Virology 103, 279-290. Plotch, S. J., and Krug, R. M. (1978) J. Virol. 25, 579-586. Furuichi, Y., and Shatkin, A. J. (1977) Virology 77, 566-578. A. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 847-851. Boone, L. R., and Skalka, A. K. (1980) Virology (in press). Chanda, P. K., and Banerjee, Testa, D., and Banerjee, A. K. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 2053-2058. Clinton, G. M., Burge, B. W. and Huang, A. S. (1979) Virology 99, 84-94. Manly, K. F. (1974) J. Virol. 13, 305-311.
883