BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
A NEW DNA POLYMERASE ACTIVITY I.
PURIFICATION
OF ESCHERICHIA s.
AND PROPERTIES OF THE ACTIVITY
PRESENT IN -E. COLI POLAl Robb E. Moses and Charles
C. Richardson
Department of Biological Chemistry Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received November 12, 1970 Summary. A new DNA polymerase activity present in cells of Escherichia coli has been purified to homogeneity from E. coli polA1. The new enzyme (polymerase II) differs from thepreviously described polymerase (polymerase I) in chromatographic sensitivity to sulfhydryl-blockinn agents, response properties, to antibody, and template requirements. The predominant (polymerase studied
I)
in extracts
extensively
has promoted activities extracts not
found
(21, with
polA1
deoxynucleotide
of -E. coli
in cells Gefter
reduced
for
responsible
for polA1,
DNA polymerase
(2),
with
sedimenting dient.
a pressure
This
report
a new polymerase distinct describes
activity
from those
the purification
--in vivo.
activity, polymerizing
methods,
purified
(7).
of polA1
the isolation
(polymerase I.
II)
activity
by
on a glycerol
gra-
from E. coli
polA1
which
II
and
and
has properties
The accompanying
of polymerase
(4,5),
Kornberg
a polymerizing
lysate
do
can be detected
in membrane fractions
(6) or toluene
E. -- coli
Although
DNA synthesis
(3),
of polymerase
has been
of polymerase
by conventional
activity,
describes
E. coli
deoxynucleotide
prepared
cell
activity
of a mutant,
DNA synthesis
ether
(8) have partially
levels
additional
in spheroplasts
treated
of wild-type
The identification
markedly
a search
contain
in vivo --
(1).
polymerizing
paper
from wild-type
cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS E. -- coli
strain
P3478 (polA1)
was a gift
1557
from J.
Cairns
(2).
of
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
Strain
DllO
BIOCHEMICAL
(polA1
The standard polymerases
endI-)
has been previously
reaction
I and II
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
mixture
contained
(0.3
described
ml)
for
66 mM Tris-HCl
(7).
the assay buffer
(pH 8.0),
6.6 mM MgC12, 1.6 mM dithiothreitol,
0.033
dATP,
, 0.25 mM "activated"
and 3H-dTTP
sperm DNA (9), the reaction activity
(1 x lo7
and enzyme.
After
was terminated
was determined
enzyme activity 10 nmoles of 30 min at
cpm/pmolej
is total
37O.
the
and the
Other
described
amount leading into
materials
for
dCTP, dGTP, salmon
30 min at
37O,
amount of acid-insoluble
as previously
nucleotide
mM each of
incubation
of DNA
to the
(7).
radio-
One unit
incorporation
acid-precipitable
of
of
material
in
and methods have been described
(7).
RESULTS Purification The absence of mits
an accurate
recovery
of Polymerase
polymerase
I in extracts
determination
of polymerase
II
of
during
the
purifications
Table purification
Fraction
specific
of -E. coli
polA1
activities (Table
and the 1).
Units
II
from PolAl Specific Activity units/mg
I. II. III. IV.
Extract DEAE Batch DEAE Column Phosphocellulose Column
(265) 238 179 154
protein (0.03) 0.24 0.35
96
Polymerase II was purified from 20 gms of cells. Table I. (Activity in the extract is not proportional to the amount of protein added to the reaction mixture.)
1558
per-
I
of DNA Polymerase
Total
II
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
Toluene T-broth paste
(7) --E.
to a density
of
was suspended
1:3
pH 7.4,
for
brought
to
cells
treatment
2 hrs with 20°,
The cell
in the
pellet
10 min.
for
4 months with
no loss
DEAE batch--A
X-100.
above buffer.
a single
(pH 7.4) cell
granular brated with buffer
with
0.02
800 ml of (pH 6.8)
of
a 5-min
was then
-60°
tolueneperiod,
with
diluted
1:3
The suspension
at 6000 lbs/sq. x g, and the
column
in.
was
The extract
supernatant
fluid
(19 cm2 x 27 cm) was
(pH 7.0).
200 ml of
eluate
Fraction
II
was diluted
1:5
from 0.02
had been equili-
gradient
of
M KP04 was pumped through
1559
with
The column was washed
Then a linear
to 0.35
(v/v)
and
to a column of micro-
(18 cm2 x 20 cm) which
above buffer.
were discarded II).
(pH 6.8).
I
by 600 ml of
(Fraction
and adsorbed
M KP04 buffer
the
at
20°
at 0-4O and all
suspension over
was collected
(pH 6.8)
DEAE cellulose
at
and 1 mM EDTA.
to the column and followed
fraction
M KP04 buffer
out
- 5% Triton.
DEAE chromatography--Fraction 0.01
shaker
(w/v)
I).
The first
1600-ml
The
8000 x g at
have been stored
The solution
0.2 M KP04 buffer
(1200 ml) was applied
was then
of 1:4
on a rotatory
stirring
DEAE-cellulose
with
(KP04),
10 min.
15 min at
were carried
with
(Fraction
for
at a dilution
cells
15 min at 30,000
was recovered
for
(200 ml) of the
a pressure
was centrifuged
phosphate
of activity.
was diluted
passed through
and stirred
gently
The cell
The suspension
1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol
0.3 M KP04 buffer
equilibrated
at 4O.
procedures
200 ml of 25% Triton
the
stirring
A portion
cells
and harvested.
in 0.05 M potassium
was re-suspended
subsequent
Extract--
with
(w/v)
by shaking
contained
treated
9 x lo8 cells/ml
The toluene-treated
for
buffers
DllO was grown at 35O in
by centrifugation
same buffer
All
coli
made 1% in toluene,
were collected
4O.
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
KP04 the
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
column,
BIOCHEMICAL
and 15-ml
fractions
single
were collected.
stituting
the
O-12-0.15
M XPO4 were pooled
peak of polymerase
Phosphocellulose diluted to
1:2
a column
the
(v/v)
(Fraction
0.02
eluting
III
gradient
A single
column
(Fig.
1).
pooled
(170 ml)
buffer
(pH 6.5),
of
the
the
equilibrated
adsorbing
I
I
20
40
400 ml of same buffer
activity
having
and concentrated
to a phosphocellulose
I 80
I 100
0.1 M KP04 from
0.10 were
from the
activity
1:2
with
fractions
eluted
polymerase
by diluting
I 60
and adsorbed
column and ll-ml
peak of polymerase
The fractions
at
(175 ml) was
(pH 6.5)
The column was washed with A linear
con-
III).
M KP04 buffer
M KP04 was pumped over
collected.
activity
(7 cm2 x 30 cm) of phosphocellulose
(pH 6.5).
to 0.40
The fractions
chromatography--Fraction
with
same buffer.
buffer
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
were
in 0.1 M KP04 column
I 120
FRACT/ON
Phosphocellulose
chromatography
of DNA polymerase
II
Z?$Al. (1 cm2 x 5 cm),
and then
eluting
in
8 ml
of
0.35 M KP04 buffer The enzyme
- 1 mM EDTA - 1 mM dithiothreitol.
(PH 6.5) (Fraction
IV)
has been stored
at O°C for
3 months without
loss
of activity. Properties Purity--Fraction during
electrophoresis
merase II,
purified
of Polymerase
IV of polymerase on polyacrylamide from wild-type
cells, 1560
II
II moves as a single gels.
Fractions
are shown in Fig.
band of poly2.
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 4 1, No. 6, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Figure 2. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of polymerase II paper). fractions purified from E. coli W3110 (see accompanying Electrophoresis was performan 7.5% gels according to proGels were fixed and stained cedures in the Canalco bulletin. for 8 hours in 0.15% Coomasie Blue in 20% trichloracetic acid, and de-stained in 40% ethanol - 5% acetic acid. A - Fraction I; B - Fraction II; C - Fraction IV.
Table Requirements
for
II
DNA Polymerase
II
Activity
Relative
Relative
Condition
Condition
Activity
Control - DNA, + poly d(~-T) - Dithiothreitol + N-ethylmaleimide 1 $1; 1 ;;:I + 0.3 mM ATP - TTP
Activity
100 <5 75 3 <5 <5 100 7
+ + + +
dGTP, - dCTP 4dXTP, + 4dXDP IdXTP, + 4dXMP 2 @I sodium PPi 0.03 M (NH4)2SO4 10 pg/ml Pronase 20 pg/ml Pancreatic DNase
4 <5 <5 45 40 <2
was assa ed as described in Table II. Polymerase II al$ivity+ Materials and Methods. Mg , Mn , and CaY+ were present at 6.6 mM. N-ethylmaleimide was present at 3 mM. Poly d(A-T) was are expressed relative to present at 0.04 mM. The activities that observed with activated DNA as 100% (0.06 nmoles of 3H-dTMP per reaction mixture). acid-insoluble Reaction nucleoside
requirements--Polymerase
5'-triphosphates
II
and Mg++ (Table 1561
requires II).
all
four
deoxy-
The base compo-
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
sition
of the product
Micrococcus tion
BIOCHEMICAL
luteus
of these
obtained
primers.
pH for
KP04 buffer.
with
DNA primers
PPi,
the
is
salmon sperm DNA and identical
The reaction
of N-ethylmaleimide, optimal
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of enzyme added and is
inhibited
or pancreatic
reaction
The rate
is
is
to the
by the presence
DNase (Table
8.1 in Tris
buffer,
of reaction
is proportional
linear
time
with
base composi-
(Fig.
II).
The
and 7.5 to the
in amount
3).
a
Figure 3. (a) Time course of polymerase II reaction. Enzyme was present at O.l2).kg/reaction mixture. (b) Proportionality of reaction with polymerase II. Assay conditions are as described in Materials and Methods. Template
requirements--Of
activated
III), greatly
reduced
centrations
a variety
DNA gave the maximal activity
which
(less
allow
than
maximal
of DNAs tested
activity.
Polymerase
5%) with
activity
(Table
poly
with
d(A-T)
polymerase
II
had
at conI.
DISCUSSION Polymerase
II
differs
merase I in several matographic
properties
merases have different inhibited merase
antibody
from the previously
respects:
1) Polymerase
than polymerase primer
(11) .
agents
4) Polymerase
to DNA polymerase
II
(10).
requirements.
by sulfhydryl-blocking I
I
described
I,
(10)
assayed has less 1562
poly-
has different
chro-
2) The two poly3) Polymerase
which
do not
affect
in the presence than
II
20% activity,
is
polyof
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table Activity
of DNA Polymerase
Template
Activated
Poly
II
T7 DNA
dA
Table III. The standard assay replacing activated DNA in the are expressed relative to that (0.05 nmoles of acid-insoluble More than 95% of the poly d(A-T) the incubation.
whereas polymerase
DNA polymerase merase II
is
II
indicate I.
that
results
from the mutation
It
in polA1.
to polymerase role
accompanying
paper.
E. coli --
in wild-type
found
The possible
mpmoles/reaction
75 30 30 30 12 140 14 65
was used with the various DNAs reaction mixture. All activities obtained with activated DNA 3H-dTMP per reaction mixture). remained acid-insoluble during
In the accompanying
present
Templates
has 95% activity.
to that
identical
Various
100 50
DNA
Our results
using
Activity
DNA
T7 DNA Heat denatured Ml3 DNA Poly d(A-T)
III
of polymerase
II
poly-
in amounts comparable
seems unlikely
purified
does not contain
paper we show that
cells
in polA1, II
polA1
since
that
polymerase
the enzyme appears
from wild-type in vivo --
II
is
cells.
discussed
in the
Acknowledgement. The work described in this paper was sponsored by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI-06045) and R.E.M. was supported by a the American Cancer Society (P-486). Public Health Service Fellowship (S-F03-GM42,968). C.C.R. is the recipient of a Public Health Service Research Career Program Award (GM-13,634). References. 1. Kornberg, A. Science 163:1410 (1969). 2. DeLucia, P., and Cairns,. Nature 224:1164 3. Smith, D. W., Schaller, H. E., and Bonhoeffer, 226:711 (1970). 1563
(1970). F. J.
Nature
Vol. 41, No. 6, 1970
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Knippers, R., and Strbtling, W. Nature 226:713 (1970). Okazaki, R., Sugimoto, K., Okazaki, T., Imae, Y., and Sugino, A. Nature 228:223 (1970). Vosberg, H-P., and Hoffmann-Berling, H. Personal communication, 1970. Moses, R. E., and Richardson, C. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. 67:674 (1970). Sci., U.S. Kornberg, T.,and Gefter, M. L. Biochem. Biophys. Res. comm. 40:1348 (1970). J. Biol. Chem. 237:519 AposhiaK H. V., and Kornberg, A. (1962). Richardson, C. C., Schildkraut, C. L., Aposhian, H. V., and Kornberg, A. J. Biol. Chem. 239:222 (1964). Jovin, T. M., Englund, P. T., and Kornberg, A. J. Biol. Chem. 244:3009 (1969).
1564