Abdominal vagatomy does not modify endotoxic shock in rats

Abdominal vagatomy does not modify endotoxic shock in rats

Life Sciences, Vol. 33, pp. Printed in the U.S.A. 1033-1037 Pergamon Pres ABDOMINAL VAGOTOMYDOES NOT MODIFY ENDOTOXIC SHOCK IN RATS A r t h u r B. ...

214KB Sizes 0 Downloads 162 Views

Life Sciences, Vol. 33, pp. Printed in the U.S.A.

1033-1037

Pergamon Pres

ABDOMINAL VAGOTOMYDOES NOT MODIFY ENDOTOXIC SHOCK IN RATS A r t h u r B. Pitterman, Gary F r i e d l a n d e r , Gerald K e l l y , Thomas G. Ropchak Daniel J. Goldstein and Harry R. Keiser National Heart, Lung, and Blood I n s t i t u t e , National I n s t i t u t e s B u i l d i n g lO, Room 8C-I03, Bethesda, Maryland 20205 (Received in final form June 24,

of Health,

1983)

Summary B i l a t e r a l subdiaphragmatic vagotomy does not improve the c l i n i c a l course nor the s u r v i v a l of Sprague-Dawley rats i n j e c t e d i n t r a v e n o u s l y with E. c o l i l i p o p o l y s a c c h a r i d e . These r e s u l t s show that whatever p e r i p h e r a l signals are e l i c i t e d by endotoxin to generate the c e n t r a l l y mediated hypotensive response, they are not conveyed to the central nervous system by abdominal vagal a f f e r e n t f i b e r s . The mechanisms by which the central e f f e c t s of the b r a i n / g u t peptides are exerted a f t e r systemic i n j e c t i o n remain to be understood ( ] ) . At least in two instances - a n g i o t e n s i n I I induced d r i n k i n g (2) and c h o l e c y s t o k i n i n induced s a t i e t y (3) - a f f e r e n t abdominal vagal f i b e r s seem to be involved in the transmission of p e r i p h e r a l l y o r i g i a n t e d s i g n a l s to the central nervous syste,7. A common central e f f e c t , however, does not imply a s i m i l a r route: the s a t i e t y induced by bombesin a f t e r systemic i n j e c t i o n is not affected by vagotomy (4). I t is known that enkephalins and g-endorphin exert well defined c e n t r a l e f f e c t s a f t e r systemic a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , which l a s t long a f t e r the peptides have disappeared from the blood stream (1). Morphine (5) and many of the endogenous o p i o i d s , as well as some of t h e i r anlogues (6), induce hypotension in the anesthesized r a t , and t h i s e f f e c t is blocked by c e r v i c a l vagotomy. The dramatic reversal by naloxone of the c a r d i o v a s c u l a r consequences of hypovolemic (7), endotoxic (8), spinal (9) and a n a p h y l a c t i c (lO) shocks have awakened considerable i n t e r e s t in the role of endogenous opioids in the r e g u l a t i o n s of blood pressure and cardiac f u n c t i o n . The e f f e c t s of naloxone seem to be central (9), even though B-endorphin l e v e l s have been found to be elevated f o l l o w i n g spinal i n j u r y ( l l ) . We studied the e f f e c t s of b i l a t e r a l subdiaphragmatic vagotomy (Vgx) on the hypotensive e f f e c t of endotoxin in the r a t , as well as the consequences of the i n t e r r u p t i o n of the abdominal vagal pathways on the s u r v i v a l a f t e r endotoxic shock. Methods Endotoxic BP Response in Vagotonized Rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats 275-350 g were anesthetized with p e n t o b a r b i t a l 50 mg/kg i n t r a p e r i t o n e a l l y (IP) (Carter-Glogan L a b o r a t o r i e s , I n c . ) w h i l e the abdominal vagi were severed b i l a t e r a l l y f o l l o w i n g the technique developed by G.P. Smith (3). The v e r i f i c a t i o n of vagotomy was made f o l l o w i n g the procedure described in ( 3 ) .

0024-3205/83 $3.00 + .00 Copyright (c) 1983 Pergamon Press Ltd.

1034

Endotoxic Shock and Vagotomy

Vol. 33, No. ii, 1983

At the conclusion of vagotomy the experiments the completeness of vagal d i s c o n n e c t i o n was checked by D.J.G. w i t h o u t previous knowledge of the p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s u l t s and the previous s u r g i c a l procedures. The vagotomies were judged complete i f no nerve f i b e r s connected the cut ends. A shamoperated group received the same procedure except the vagi were manipulated but l e f t i n t a c t . A f t e r 3 to 5 weeks, the rats received p e n t o b a r b i t a l , 50 mg/kg ( I P ) , w h i l e the t a i l a r t e r y and j u g u l a r vein were cannulated w i t h PE-50 t u b i n g as described by Chiueh and Kopin (12). The catheters were brought through the skin at the back of the neck and threaded through a small diameter f l e x i b l e spring f o r p r o t e c t i o n . The catheters were heparinized (250 u n i t s / c a t h e t e r ) and each rat was placed in a separate cage 11.5 x 7 x 5 inches. Twenty four hours l a t e r , the a r t e r i a l c a t h e t e r was connected to a micropressure transducer (P2306 Strathom-Gould) and recorder (2400 Brush Gould). A f t e r the BP recording was s t a b l e , the awake and f u l l y mobile animal received endotoxin l i p o p o l y s a c c h a r i d e from E. c o l i sertoype No. 055:B5, (Sigma Co.) followed by a s a l i n e f l u s h , 0.4 ml, via the venous c a t h e t e r . Endotoxin M o r t a l i t y in Unrestrained Rats. Three to s i x weeks a f t e r the vagotomy and sham o p e r a t i o n , a j u g u l a r c a t h e t e r was i n s e r t e d as p r e v i o u s l y described. Each animal was placed in a cage and 24 hours l a t e r the rat received e n d o t o x i n , I00 mg/kg via the c a t h e t e r , followed by a 0.4 ml s a l i n e f l u s h . The number a l i v e at 24 hours was determined. Endotoxin M o r t a l i t y in Atropine M e t h y l n i t r a t e - T r e a t e d Rats. SpragueDawley male rats 300-500 g were anesthetized (Ether USP JT Baker Chemical Co.) p r i o r to i n s e r t i o n of a PE-50 c a t h e t e r in the j u g u l a r v e i n . The animals were place in i n d i v i d u a l cages. Twenty four hours l a t e r the rats received e i t h e r a t r o p i n e m e t h y l n i t r a t e (Sigma Co.), l mg/kg IV, or s a l i n e followed by e n d o t o x i n , 70 mg/kg IV. The cannula was then connected to an i n f u s i o n (Harvard I n f u s i o n Pump, Harvard Co.) of a t r o p i n e m e t h y l n i t r a t e , l mg/kg/hr, or s a l i n e , 0.0035 ml/min, to the c o n t r o l animals. The i n f u s i o n was continued f o r 24 hours and then the number a l i v e was counted. Analysis of the data. The d i f f e r e n c e in BP response of the vagotomy and sham-operated groups was analyzed using the rank sum t e s t of two independent samples (13) and the m o r t a l i t y rate of the treatment group was compared w i t h t h a t of the control group by F i s h e r ' s exact p r o b a b i l i t y t e s t (14). Results The i . v . a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of endotoxin in u n r e s t r a i n e d , awake animals, induces a biphasic decrease in blood pressure. The f i r s t hypotensive episode (Bl) occurs immediately a f t e r the i n j e c t i o n of the l i p o p o l y s a c c h a r i d e and l a s t s approximately lO minutes. The secod hypotensive episode (B2) s t a r t s approximately 45 minutes a f t e r the a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of e n d o t o x i n . There was no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e between Vgx and sham-opperated rats in s y s t o l i c , d i a s t o l i c and mean a r t e r i a l blood pressures in e i t h e r the Bl or the B2 hypotensive phases (Table I ) . The time of onset of hypotension was not s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t in the two groups. The endotoxin-induced m o r t a l i t y was not s i g n i f i c a n t l y Vgx and sham-operated animals (Table I I ) .

different

between

The a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of atropine m e t h y l n i t r a t e , an a n t i c h o l i n e r g i c drug t h a t does not cross the b l o o d / b r a i n b a r r i e r (15), did not protect i n t a c t rats from death induced by endotoxin (Table I l l ) .

Vol. 33, No. ii, 1983

Endotoxic Shock and Vagotomy

1035

TABLE I Blood Pressure Before and A f t e r Endotoxin in U n r e s t r a i n e d Rats* Blood Pressure ( t o r r s ) Before Endotoxin

A f t e r Endotoxin Decrease d u r i n g Decrease d u r i n g initial h y p o t e n s i o n delayed h y p o t e n s i o n

Vagotomized (n = I 0 ) Systolic

137 + 9

Diastolic

94+4

37 + 7 18+6

6+

4

25 + 6

17 +

6

142 + 6

32 + 5

43 +

4

93 + 4

9 + 5

7 +

3

109 + 4

18 + 5

19 +

3

108 + 5

Mean

33 + I0

Sham-Operated (n = I 0 ) Systolic Diastolic Mean P g r e a t e r than

0.05

0.05

0.05

* 70 mg/kg i . v . P= Comparing vagotomized and sham-operated groups:

Results are mean + S,E,M,

TABLE I I Mortality

of Vagotomized or Sham-Operated Rats A f t e r E n d o t o x i n * V.agotomi.zed

Sham

Alive

5

9

Dead

15

17

Percent Dead

75

89

* 70 mg/kg i . v ,

1036

Endotoxic Shock and Vagotomy

Vol. 33, No. ii, 1983

TABLE I I I Mortality

of A t r o p i n e M e t h y l i n i t r a t e or Saline Treated Unrestrained Rats After Endotoxin*

Atropine** Methylnitrate

Saline

Alive

7

9

Dead

6

4

46

31

Percent Dead

* 70 mg/kg i . v . ** 1 mg/kg i . v .

followed by an i n f u s i o n l mg/kg/hr Discussion

B i l a t e r a l subdiaphragmatic vagotomy did not modify e i t h e r the hypotensive e f f e c t s of endotoxin or the s u r v i v a l rate of Sprague-Dawley rats a f t e r endotoxic shock. Peripheral c h o l i n e r g i c blockade by a t r o p i n e m e t h y l n i t r a t e , an a n t i c h o l i n e r g i c drug t h a t does not cross the b l o o d / b r a i n b a r r i e r , did not p r o t e c t the rat from the d e l e t e r i o u s consequences of ioV. administered e n d o t o x i n . We have not examined the e f f e c t of b i l a t e r a l subdiaphragmatic vagotomy on the naloxone reversal of c a r d i o v a s c u l a r parameters in endotoxic shock. I t is known t h a t naloxone's e f f e c t s are blocked by b i l a t e r a l c e r v i c a l vagotomy or m e t h y l a t r o p i n e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n in the spinal shock model (16), suggesting t h a t the e f f e c t of endogenous opiates might be mediated by parasymathetic e f f e r e n t nerves o r i g i n a t i n g in brain stem. Our r e s u l t s show t h a t n e i t h e r c h o l i n e r g i c ( e f f e r e n t ) nor a f f e r e n t abdominal vagal nerves are d i r e c t l y i n v o l v e d in the hypotension of the endotoxic shock in the r a t . Given the number of peptides known so f a r to be present in the vagal trunks ( V . I . P . , c h l o e c y s t o k i n i n , substance P, g a s t r i n ) (17), we can not rule out the p a r t i c i p i a t i o n of other n e u r o t r a n s m i t t e r s or neuromodulators derived from vagal e f f e r e n t s in the genesis or the modulation of the p h y s i o l o g i c a l derangements induced by i . v . e n d o t o x i n . The clarification of t h i s p o i n t w i l l be made possible only a f t e r the developement of r e l i a b l e and s p e c i f i c antagonists of these peptides. On the other hand, our data allow us to exclude a vagal a f f e r e n t pathway as the route by which the c e n t r a l , n a l o x o n e - s e n s i t i v e receptors, are a c t i v a t e d by the p e r i p h e r a l l y administered l i p o p o l y s a c c h a r i d e . We do not know i f c i r c u l a t i n g opioid peptides are i n v o l v e d in the process, but even i f they were, the abdominal vagi and t h e i r receptors can be ruled out as the conveyors to the c e n t r a l nervous system of s i g n a l s e l i c i t e d by them. References l °

2. 3.

A.J. KASTIN, R.I). OLSON, A.V. SCHALLY and D.H. COY, L i f e Sci. 25 401414 (1979). D.J. GOLDSTEIN and J.A. HALPERIN, Proceedings of the VII I n t e r n a t i o n a l Congress of Pharmacology, Pergamon Press, London (1978). G.P. SMITH, C. JEROME, B.J. CUSHIN, R. ETERNO and K.J. SIMANSKY, Science 213 1036-1037 (1981)

Vol. 33, No. 11, 1983

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. I0. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Endotoxic Shock and Vagotomy

1037

G.P. SMITH, C. JEROME and d. GIBBS, Peptides 2 409-411 (1981). A.G.J. EVANS, P.A. NASMYTH and H.C. STEWART,-Brit. J. Pharmacol. 7 542552 (1952) E. WET, A. LEE and J.K. CHANG, Life Sci. 26 1517-1522 (1980). A.I. FADEN and J.W. HOLADAY, Science 211 3-]-7-318 (1979). J.W. HOLADAY and A.I. FADEN, Nature 275 450-451 (1978). J.W. HOLADAY and A.I. FADEN, Brain R ~ 189 295-299 (1980). S. AMIR, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 80 161-162 ( ~ 2 ) . A.I. FADEN, T.P. JACOBS, E. MOUGEY, and J.W. HOLADAY, Ann. Neurol. I0 326-332 (1981). C.C. CHIUEH and l . J . KOPIN, Am. J. Physiol. 234 H690-695 (1978). F. WILCOXON, Biom. B u l l . 1 80 (1945). R.A. FISHER, S t a t i s t i c a l M-ethods for Reserach, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and Lond~)n, I0 t h T d i t i o n (1948). L. STEIN, Science 139 46-48 (1963). J.M. LUNDBERG, T. HOKFELT, G. NILSSON, L. TERENIUS, J. REHFELD, R. ELDE and S. SAID, Acta Physol. Scand, 104 499-501 (1978). A.I. FADEN, T.P. JACOBS and J.k/. HOLADAY, J. Autonomic Nervous System 2 295-304 (1980).