Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets With Ixekizumab: Pooled Analyses From Four Clinical Studies

Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets With Ixekizumab: Pooled Analyses From Four Clinical Studies

Journal Pre-proof Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets With Ixekizumab: Pooled Analyses From Four Clinical Studies April...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 43 Views

Journal Pre-proof Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets With Ixekizumab: Pooled Analyses From Four Clinical Studies April Armstrong, MD, MPH, David Amato, DO, FAAD, William Huster, PhD, Clement Ojeh, PhD, Abby S. Van Voorhees, MD. PII:

S0190-9622(19)32774-4

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.030

Reference:

YMJD 13841

To appear in:

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Received Date: 2 July 2018 Revised Date:

13 September 2019

Accepted Date: 17 September 2019

Please cite this article as: Armstrong A, Amato D, Huster W, Ojeh C, Van Voorhees AS, Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets With Ixekizumab: Pooled Analyses From Four Clinical Studies, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jaad.2019.09.030. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.

1

Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets With

2

Ixekizumab: Pooled Analyses From Four Clinical Studies

3 4

April Armstrong MD, MPH1, David Amato DO, FAAD2, William Huster PhD2,

5

Clement Ojeh PhD3, Abby S Van Voorhees MD.4

6

1

7

Indianapolis, IN, USA; 3Lilly USA, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 4Department of Dermatology,

8

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Eli Lilly and Company,

9 10

Corresponding author:

11

April W. Armstrong, MD MPH

12

1975 Zonal Avenue

13

Office of the Dean

14

Keck School of Medicine of the USC,

15

Los Angeles, CA- 90033, USA

16

Phone: +11-323-442-1100

17

Email: [email protected]

18

Funding sources: Eli Lilly and Company

19

IRB approval status: The individual studies were approved by institutional review

20

boards.

21

Clinicaltrials.gov (or equivalent) listing (if applicable): I1F-MC-RHAZ:

22

NCT01474512; I1F-MC-RHBA: NCT01597245; I1F-MC-RHBC: NCT01646177; I1F-MC-

23

RHBS: NCT02561806 1

24

Related Presentation: Achievement of the National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment

25

Targets Among Patients in Ixekizumab Clinical Trials: Analysis of Pooled UNCOVER

26

Results was presented at National Psoriasis Foundation - 2017 Research Symposium,

27

Chicago, IL, USA.

28

Conflicts of Interest:

29

April Armstrong has served as an investigator and/or advisor to AbbVie, BMS,

30

Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, Leo Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi,

31

and Ortho Dermatologics.

32

D. Amato is a shareholder and former employee of Eli Lilly and Company.

33

W. Huster and C. Ojeh were employees, but retired from Eli Lilly and Company.

34

Abby S. Van Voorhees has received honoraria for consulting and/or participating in the

35

advisory boards for: Dermira, Novartis, Allergan, Celgene, AbbVie, DermTech, Pfizer,

36

Astra Zeneca, Corrona and Valeant; she also served as an investigator for Celgene,

37

Lilly, and Corrona.

38 39

Reprint requests: April Armstrong

40 41

Manuscript word count: 1684 words [excluding capsule summary, abstract,

42

references, figures, and tables]

43

Abstract word count: 198

44

Capsule summary word count: 50

45

References: 17

46

Figures: 4

2

47

Tables: 1

48

List of Attachments: (1) Cover Letter (2) CONSORT checklist, (3) Research protocol,

49

(4) Statistical analysis plan, (5) IRB Approval Letter

50 51

Clinical trial registration: UNCOVER-1 (I1F-MC-RHAZ: NCT01474512); UNCOVER-2 (I1F-

52

MC-RHBA: NCT01597245); UNCOVER-3 (I1F-MC-RHBC: NCT01646177); IXORA-S (I1F-MC-

53

RHBS: NCT02561806)

54 55

Keywords: psoriasis; IL-17; ixekizumab; etanercept; National Psoriasis Foundation;

56

treatment goals; Pooled analysis

57 58 59

Capsule Summary •

treatment goals defined by the National Psoriasis Foundation.

60 61

The majority of ixekizumab-treated psoriasis subjects achieved U.S. psoriasis



These results provide information regarding how psoriasis therapies such as

62

ixekizumab perform using clinically relevant endpoints established by NPF treatment

63

targets, which is critical for clinicians and patients to establish meaningful treatment

64

expectations.

65 66 67 68 69

3

70

Abstract

71

Background: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) published treatment targets for US

72

patients with plaque psoriasis. However, data are lacking on how well existing therapies

73

help achieve these goals.

74

Objective: We examined the ability of an IL-17 inhibitor, ixekizumab, in achieving these

75

treatment targets.

76

Methods: Post-hoc analysis was performed on data from four Phase III clinical trials

77

assessing IXE for plaque psoriasis: pooled data from the UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3 trials,

78

and data from the IXORA-S trial. Treatment response was evaluated using NPF-defined

79

acceptable response (AR: BSA ≤3% or BSA improvement ≥75% at 12 weeks of treatment)

80

and target response (TR: BSA ≤1% at 12 weeks and every 6 months thereafter).

81

Results: In UNCOVER studies (n=2701), AR and TR rates at Week 12 were 73.9% and

82

51.8% with IXE Q2W, 35.7% and 14.9% with etanercept and 3.0% and 0.6% with placebo,

83

respectively. In IXORA-S (n=302), AR and TR rates at Week 12 were significantly higher

84

with IXE Q2W versus ustekinumab (AR: 68.4% vs 38.6%, p<.0001; TR: 50.7% vs 24.1%,

85

p<.0001).

86

Limitations: Data were from controlled studies and may not reflect real-world practice.

87

Conclusion: The majority of IXE-treated subjects in four phase III clinical trials achieved

88

NPF, patient-centered treatment targets.

89

90

Introduction 4

91

The existing outcome measures used in clinical trials for psoriasis are not widely used in

92

clinical practice, well-understood, or meaningful to patients. In a pivotal effort, the National

93

Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recently defined treatment goals for patients with psoriasis in

94

the US11 which represent patient-centered outcome measures relying on improvements

95

in body surface area affected. The rationale for this effort is to establish targets to inform

96

treatment decisions, reduce disease burden and improve patient outcomes in clinical

97

practice.

98 99

To date, no published data exist on how existing therapies perform in achieving psoriasis treatment targets. These data are critical because clinicians and patients need to

100

use these data to establish treatment expectations and create meaningful response to

101

treatment.

102

In this study, we examined how ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that

103

selectively targets IL-17A,12 performs in achieving established treatment targets from NPF.

104

Specifically, we evaluated the endpoint of the body surface area (BSA) data from the

105

ixekizumab phase 3 trials, against NPF treatment targets. In addition, we also evaluated

106

the concordance between the achievement of acceptable response per NPF

107

recommendations and PASI response rates from the same trials.

108 109

Methods

110

Study Design

111

UNCOVER-1, -2, -313,14, and IXORA-S15 were randomized, double-blind, Phase 3

112

studies conducted in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The study design,

113

and the efficacy and safety data from these studies have been published previously 13-16, 5

114

including the methodology for integrated data from these studies (UNCOVER-1, -2 and -3)

115

13

116

and -3 studies and the IXORA-S study were analyzed individually.

117

Study Assessments

118

. For the present study, the BSA data from the integration of the three UNCOVER-1, -2

The efficacy measures analyzed were the BSA measurements collected during the

119

UNCOVER and IXORA-S trials. BSA measurements were assessed to determine

120

response rates in accordance with the recently published NPF recommendations.

121

Response rates were classified into the proportion of subjects achieving acceptable

122

response, defined as BSA ≤3% or BSA improvement ≥75% at 12 weeks of treatment11, and

123

the proportion of subjects achieving target response, defined as BSA ≤1% at 12 weeks and

124

every 6 months thereafter11. Additionally, the percentage of subjects who achieved at least

125

90% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the

126

concordance between BSA acceptable response and PASI response were also analyzed.

127

At Week 12, data only from the placebo (PBO), etanercept (ETN) and ixekizumab 80

128

mg every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W) treatment arms were evaluated from the three UNCOVER

129

trials. For the maintenance phase (after Week 12) of the trials, target responses in

130

UNCOVER-1 and -2 were evaluated based on subjects who were IXE responders (those

131

achieving sPGA 0,1 at Week 12), and separate analyses were performed on all treatment

132

arms. In UNCOVER-3 study, 12 to 60 weeks results were included in subjects who were

133

IXE responders to the treatment at Week 12.

134 135

For IXORA-S study, target assessments were performed for all treatment arms at Week 12, and monthly through Week 52.

6

136 137

Statistical Analysis All randomized subjects were included in the efficacy analyses; data were

138

analyzed by randomized treatment group. We calculated the percentage of subjects

139

across the pooled UNCOVER studies and in the IXORA-S study who met the NPF

140

acceptable and target response criteria. For the induction period, response rates were

141

analyzed by pair-wise comparison of the treatment groups, using a Cochran-Mantel-

142

Haenszel chi-square statistical test stratified by study. All statistical testing was

143

performed 2-sided (alpha=0.05) without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Subjects

144

who discontinued the study agent for any reason were considered nonresponders for

145

the acceptable and target responses (nonresponder imputation). No statistical testing

146

was performed for the maintenance period.

147

Results

148

A total of 3003 subjects were included from UNCOVER-1, -2, -3 (n=2701) and

149

IXORA-S (n=302) studies in this analysis. Overall baseline demographics and disease

150

characteristics were similar among the treatment groups across studies included (Table 1)

151

UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3 Studies

152

During induction period (Weeks 0 to 12)

153

In the UNCOVER studies, 73.9% of subjects treated with IXE Q2W achieved the

154

acceptable response (BSA ≤3% or BSA improvement ≥75%) at Week 12 versus 35.7%

155

with ENT (p<.001) and 3.0% with PBO (p<.001). (Figure 1). In subjects treated with IXE

156

Q2W, 51.8% achieved, the target response (BSA ≤1%) at Week 12 versus 14.9% with

157

etanercept (p<.001) and 0.6% with placebo (p<.001). PASI 90 was achieved in 70% 7

158

subjects with IXE Q2W versus etanercept (22.3%, p<.001), and placebo (1.1%; p<.001).

159

Additionally, the concordance between BSA acceptable response and PASI over the

160

induction period for all treatment groups was best for PASI 90 (89.8%, 86.6%, and 86.7%),

161

at Week 4 (N=3771), Week 8 (N=3732), and Week 12 (N=3683), respectively.

162

Maintenance period (Week 12 to 60)

163

In the UNCOVER-1 and -2 studies (n=363), the target response (BSA ≤1%) at

164

Week 60 was 74.7% in IXE Q2W responders treated with IXE Q4W through Week 60 (IXE

165

Q2W to Q4W) versus 4.7% in subjects who were re-randomized to placebo (IXE Q2W to

166

placebo) (Figure 2A). In UNCOVER-3 study, the target response was 82.1% with IXE

167

Q2W-Q4W treatment at Week 60 (Figure 2B). Comparison of BSA target responses to

168

PASI 75/90 and sPGA 0,1 is shown in (Figures 3A and 3B). In the UNCOVER-1 and -2

169

studies, the concordance between BSA target response and PASI over the maintenance

170

period was best for PASI 90 (80.4%, 85.5%, and 84.2%), at Week 16 (N=1216), Week 36

171

(N=857), and Week 60 (N=595), respectively.

172

In IXE non-responders (sPGA >1 at 12 weeks) from UNCOVER-1, and -2 studies

173

who were on placebo (n=546), etanercept (n=200), or IXE Q2W (n=111) and re-treated

174

with IXE Q4W, the target response rate was achieved in 68.1% with placebo-Q4W

175

subjects, 64% with etanercept to IXE Q4W, and 34.2% with IXE Q2W to IXE Q4W at Week

176

60 (Figure 2C). Similar response rates were observed in IXE non-responders from

177

UNCOVER-3 study through Week 60 (Figure 2D). Additionally, in IXE non-responders

178

(UNCOVER-1, and -2), PASI 90 response rate at Week 60 was 79% in subjects treated

179

with PBO to Q4W, 70% with etanercept to Q4W, and 41% with Q2W-Q4W. Similar trend

8

180

was observed with PASI 75 with IXE non-responders who participated in UNCOVER-3

181

study.

182

IXORA-S Study

183

During the induction period, acceptable response and target response rates were

184

significantly higher with IXE Q2W versus ustekinumab (acceptable response: 68.4% vs

185

38.6%, p<.0001; target response: 50.7% vs 24.1%, p<.0001; Figure 4A). During the

186

maintenance period, subjects who received Q2W for the first 12 weeks and Q4W

187

thereafter, the target response was consistently higher with IXE Q2W versus ustekinumab

188

at 52 weeks (71.3% vs 56.6%, p=.0086; Figure 4B). At Week 52, PASI 90 was achieved in

189

76.5% of subjects with IXE Q2W versus ustekinumab (59.0%; p<.0014).

190

Discussion

191

The NPF established the first treatment targets for psoriasis in the US, based on an

192

expert-based consensus process 11. The NPF treatment target recommendations suggest

193

that measurement of BSA would be an appropriate outcome to measure in clinical practice.

194

To date, we have not examined how well the existing therapies can help achieve these

195

treatment targets. These data are critical to inform clinicians and patients regarding how

196

well current therapies work in achieving treatment targets and how to manage patient

197

expectations and devise future treatment plans.

198

The present study is among the first efforts to determine how a biologic therapy

199

indicated for plaque psoriasis, performs in achieving these NPF treatment targets. This

200

study leverages pooled data from the ixekizumab clinical trials program to determine how

201

well an IL-17 inhibitor can meet these treatment targets based on results from four large 9

202

clinical trials with 3428 subjects. In this population of subjects with high psoriasis disease

203

severity at baseline, 75% of all subjects achieved an acceptable response of BSA ≤3% at

204

Week 12. Nearly 80% of subjects achieved target responses of BSA ≤1% by Week 60.

205

Significantly higher proportion of ixekizumab-treated subjects per US-labeled dose

206

achieved and maintained NPF-defined psoriasis treatment goals (acceptable and target

207

response at Week 12), compared to those receiving PBO, etanercept (UNCOVER -2 and -

208

3) or ustekinumab (IXORA-S). Additionally, in subjects from 4 studies analyzed, PASI 90

209

response rates were significantly higher with ixekizumab versus etanercept or

210

ustekinumab. PASI 90 responses were generally consistent with the BSA acceptable

211

response during the induction period and consistent with the BSA target response during

212

the maintenance period.

213

These study results are critical in helping clinicians understand how current psoriasis

214

therapies perform using clinically relevant endpoints established by the NPF treatment

215

targets. The study findings show that NPF treatment targets can be achieved and

216

maintained by the majority of subjects on ixekizumab, one of several psoriasis therapies

217

with robust efficacy data from clinical trials. A limitation of the current study is that the

218

analyses were conducted using results from four clinical trials, which may not be

219

representative of all patients observed in real-world clinical settings such as patients with

220

certain comorbidities.

221

Treatment targets spark dialogs between clinicians and patients regarding

222

assessment of current therapies and need for re-evaluation. When a patient does not

223

achieve treatment targets, this provides an opportunity to ask clinically relevant questions

224

such as, “Will this patient continue to improve if enough time elapses?” or “How can I 10

225

incorporate other management options to optimize the response?”. In the present analysis,

226

one-third of nonresponders who were on ixekizumab were able to achieve treatment

227

targets when ixekizumab treatment was continued for 60 weeks. Thus, the opportunity to

228

evaluate patients against treatment targets enable a reflection point for considerations of

229

dose escalations of existing therapy, adding another agent to the existing therapy, or

230

switching to an alternative agent.

231

Conclusions

232

In this analysis from 4 studies, ixekizumab-treated subjects achieved and

233

maintained a high level of skin clearance according to the NPF treatment targets. In

234

addition, the proportion of subjects who achieved treatment targets closely aligned with

235

PASI 90 results from clinical trials. Thus, the target recommendations using BSA are

236

reflective of the PASI clinical measurement system that is used in typical psoriasis clinical

237

trials. Importantly, achieving treatment targets is possible for many psoriasis patients on

238

advanced therapies. These results highlight the importance of using clinical trial data as

239

one useful measure of how a therapy will perform in helping patients achieve treatment

240

targets in the real world.

241 242

Abbreviations

243

BSA: body surface area

244

IXE: ixekizumab 80 mg

245

NPF: National Psoriasis Foundation

11

246

PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index

247

PsA: psoriatic arthritis

248

sPGA: static Physician Global Assessment

249

Q2W: every 2 weeks

250

Q4W: every 4 weeks

251 252

Acknowledgments

253

The authors would like to thank Kalyan Pulipaka and Clinton C. Bertram, Ph.D., medical writers

254

and employees of Eli Lilly and Company, for writing and editorial support.

255

12

256

Tables and Figures

257

Table 1. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics.

258

Figure 1. Plaque psoriasis. Proportion of subjects with NPF acceptable and target

259

responses at Week 12 (UNCOVER-1, -2 and -3; NRI). BSA acceptable response is BSA

260

≤3% or a reduction of ≥75% from BL. BSA target response is BSA ≤1%. ETN data is from

261

UNCOVER -2 and -3 only. PBO and IXE Q2W data is from UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3

262

studies. IXE, ixekizumab; Q2W, every 2 weeks; PBO, placebo; ETN, etanercept.

263

Figure 2. Plaque psoriasis. Proportion of IXE responders/non-responders with NPF target

264

responses during the maintenance period (Week 12 to 60; UNCOVER-1, and -2; NRI).

265

ETN data is from UNCOVER -2 and -3 only. PBO and IXE Q2W data is from

266

UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3 studies. IXE, ixekizumab; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4

267

weeks; PBO, placebo; ETN, etanercept; NonR, non-responder. †Responders are those

268

who achieved sPGA 0,1 at Week 12

269

Figure 3. Plaque psoriasis. Comparison of BSA responses to PASI 75/90 and to

270

sPGA(0)/(0,1). BSA, body surface area; PASI 75, 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area

271

and Severity Index; PASI 90, 90% improvement in PASI; sPGA, static Physician Global

272

Assessment.

273

Figure 4. Plaque psoriasis. Proportion of subjects with NPF acceptable and target

274

responses (IXORA-S Study, NRI). BSA acceptable response is BSA ≤3% or a reduction of

275

≥75% from baseline. BSA target response is BSA ≤1%. BSA, body surface area; UST,

276

ustekinumab; IXE, ixekizumab.

13

277

Table 1. Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics UNCOVER-1, -2, and-3 a

IXORA-S b

PBO

ETN

IXE Q2W

UST

IXE Q2W

(n=792)

(n=740)

(n=1169)

(n=166)

(n=136)

Age, years

46.2 (12.8)

45.5 (13.3)

45.1 (12.9)

44.0 (13.3) 42.7 (12.7)

Male, n (%)

560 (70.7)

505 (68.2)

766 (65.5)

112 (67.5)

Race, white, n (%)

726 (91.7)

682 (92.7)

1092 (93.5)

157 (95.7) 125 (93.3)

Weight, kg

91.6 (23.5)

92.5 (23.4)

90.8 (22.7)

89.4 (24.8) 85.8 (20.3)

PASI total score

20.6 (8.5)

19.9 (7.5)

20.1 (7.9)

19.8 (9.0) 19.9 (8.2)

sPGA

3.6 (0.6)

3.5 (0.6)

3.5 (0.6)

3.6 (0.6)

% BSA

27.7 (17.8)

26.8 (16.6)

27.2 (17.1)

27.5 (16.7) 26.7 (16.5)

Duration of psoriasis (years)

19.1 (12.1)

18.5 (12.1)

18.8 (12.1)

18.2 (12.0) 18.0 (11.1)

416 (52.5)

388 (52.4)

662 (56.6)

152 (91.6) 126 (92.6)

257 (32.4)

136 (18.4)

315 (26.9)

89 (61.0)

74 (59.7)

319 (40.3)

330 (44.6)

515 (44.1)

25 (15.1)

18 (13.2)

90 (66.2)

3.6 (0.7)

≥1 Previous psoriasis treatment Nonbiologic systemic, % Phototherapy, %

c

d

Biologics, %

Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; ETN, etanercept; IXE, ixekizumab; N, number of subjects; PBO, placebo; PUVA, psoralen and ultraviolet A; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; R, randomization; sPGA, static Physician Global Assessment; UST, ustekinumab; UVB, ultraviolet B. a

Data from UNCOVER-2 and -3 only.

b

IXE=80 mg of ixekizumab every 2 weeks from Weeks 0 to 12, then 80 mg of ixekizumab every 4 weeks from

Weeks 12 to 52. c

Nonbiologic systemic treatments include cyclosporine, methotrexate, corticosteroids, acitretin, fumaric acid

derivatives, and apremilast. d

Phototherapy includes PUVA and UVB therapy. Values are mean (standard deviation).

278 14

279

References

280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9. 10.

11. 12. 13. 14.

15.

16.

17.

Gottlieb AB, Dann F. Comorbidities in patients with psoriasis. Am J Med. 2009;122(12):1150 e1151-1159. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. The association between psoriasis and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Diabetes. 2012;2:e54. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. The association between psoriasis and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Hypertens. 2013;31(3):433-442; discussion 442-433. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. Psoriasis and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(4):654-662. Becker L, Tom WL, Eshagh K, Benjamin LT, Paller AS. Excess adiposity preceding pediatric psoriasis. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):573-574. Langan SM, Seminara NM, Shin DB, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriasis: a population-based study in the United Kingdom. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(3 Pt 1):556-562. Katsiki N, Anagnostis P, Athyros VG, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP. Psoriasis and Vascular Risk : An Update. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(39):6114-6125. Parisi R, Rutter MK, Lunt M, et al. Psoriasis and the Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events: Cohort Study Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(9):2189-2197. Shahwan KT, Kimball AB. Psoriasis and Cardiovascular Disease. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99(6):1227-1242. Leavitt M. Psoriasis costs U.S. up to $135 billion a year. https://www.psoriasis.org/advance/psoriasis-costs-us-up-to-135-billion-a-year. Accessed on 2July-2018. 2015. Armstrong AW, Siegel MP, Bagel J, et al. From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(2):290-298. Liu L, Lu J, Allan BW, et al. Generation and characterization of ixekizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin-17A. J Inflamm Res. 2016;9:39-50. Gordon KB, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, et al. Phase 3 Trials of Ixekizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):345-356. Griffiths CE, Reich K, Lebwohl M, et al. Comparison of ixekizumab with etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe psoriasis (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3): results from two phase 3 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):541-551. Paul C, Griffiths CEM, van de Kerkhof PCM, et al. Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared to ustekinumab over 52-weeks of treatment: results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018. Blauvelt A GM, Iversen L, Ball S, Zhang L, Agada NO, Reich K. Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results Through 108 Weeks of a Randomized, Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial (UNCOVER-3). Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2017;(In Press). Paul C, Griffiths CE, van de Kerkhof P, et al. Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared to ustekinumab over 52-weeks of treatment: results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;Submitted.

15