Comparison of real-world treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis prescribed ixekizumab or secukinumab

Comparison of real-world treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis prescribed ixekizumab or secukinumab

Journal Pre-proof Comparison of Real-World Treatment Patterns among Psoriasis Patients Prescribed Ixekizumab or Secukinumab Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA, ...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 36 Views

Journal Pre-proof Comparison of Real-World Treatment Patterns among Psoriasis Patients Prescribed Ixekizumab or Secukinumab Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA, Nianwen Shi, PhD, Russel Burge, PhD, William N. Malatestinic, PharmD, MBA, Chen-Yen Lin, PhD, Carolyn R. Lew, PhD, Nicole M. Zimmerman, MS, Orin M. Goldblum, MD, Baojin Zhu, PhD, Mwangi J. Murage, PhD, MPH PII:

S0190-9622(19)33021-X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.015

Reference:

YMJD 13997

To appear in:

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Received Date: 18 June 2019 Revised Date:

5 November 2019

Accepted Date: 5 November 2019

Please cite this article as: Blauvelt A, Shi N, Burge R, Malatestinic WN, Lin C-Y, Lew CR, Zimmerman NM, Goldblum OM, Zhu B, Murage MJ, Comparison of Real-World Treatment Patterns among Psoriasis Patients Prescribed Ixekizumab or Secukinumab, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.015. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.

1

1

Article type: Original article

2

Title: Comparison of Real-World Treatment Patterns among Psoriasis Patients Prescribed

3

Ixekizumab or Secukinumab

4

Andrew Blauvelt, MD, MBA1, Nianwen Shi, PhD2, Russel Burge, PhD3,4, William N. Malatestinic,

5

PharmD, MBA3, Chen-Yen Lin, PhD3, Carolyn R. Lew, PhD2, Nicole M. Zimmerman, MS2, Orin

6

M. Goldblum, MD3, Baojin Zhu, PhD3, Mwangi J. Murage, PhD, MPH3 1

7

Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, Oregon; 2IBM Watson Health, Cambridge,

8

Massachusetts; 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; 4University of Cincinnati,

9

Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

10

Corresponding author:

11

Mwangi J. Murage, PhD, MPH

12

Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence (GPORWE)

13

Eli Lilly and Company, USA

14

LCT – South Building 171-2, Drop Code 5221

15

1555 Harding St., Indianapolis, IN 46221

16

Email: [email protected]

17 18

Funding sources: Eli Lilly and Company.

19 20

Conflicts of interest: Dr. Andrew Blauvelt had received honoraria as a scientific adviser/clinical

21

study investigator from AbbVie, Aclaris, Akros, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Athenex,

22

Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dermavant, Dermira, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Galderma,

23

Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Leo, Meiji, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis,

24

Pfizer, Purdue Pharma, Regeneron, Revance, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sienna

2

25

Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Valeant, Vidac, and as a paid speaker from

26

Abbvie, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, but none related to this work. Dr. Nianwen Shi, Dr.

27

Carolyn R. Lew, and Nicole M. Zimmerman, are employees of IBM Watson Health that was

28

compensated by Eli Lilly and Company for conducting this research. Dr. Russel Burge, Dr.

29

William N. Malatestinic, Dr. Chen Yen Lin, Dr. Orin M. Goldblum, Dr. Baojin Zhu, and Dr. Mwangi

30

J. Murage are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and hold stock in Eli Lilly and Company.

31

Editorial support was provided by Dr. Jessamine P. Winer-Jones, Ph.D. of IBM Watson Health.

32

These services were paid for by Eli Lilly and Company.

33 34

IRB approval status: Not applicable. All study data were accessed with protocols compliant with

35

US patient confidentiality requirements, including the Health Insurance Portability and

36

Accountability Act of 1996 regulations (HIPAA). As all database used in the study are fully de-

37

identified and compliant with the HIPPA, this study was exempted from Institutional Review

38

Board approval.

39 40

Part of the data on this manuscript has been planned to be presented as a poster at the 2019

41

Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 1-5, Washington, DC.

42 43

Reprint requests: Mwangi J. Murage

44 45

Manuscript word count: 2,499 words

46

Abstract word count: 200

47

Capsule summary word count: 51

48

References: 31

49

Figures: 3

50

Tables: 2

3

51 52

Key words: psoriasis, ixekizumab, secukinumab, treatment persistence, treatment adherence,

53

treatment discontinuation, treatment switching

4

54

Abstract

55

Background: Real-world data on treatment patterns associated with use of IL-17A inhibitors in

56

psoriasis are lacking.

57

Objective: To compare treatment patterns between ixekizumab or secukinumab users in

58

clinical practice.

59

Methods: Psoriasis patients ≥18 years old with ixekizumab or secukinumab between March 1,

60

2016, and May 31, 2018 in IBM MarketScan® databases. Inverse probability of treatment

61

weighting and multivariable models were used to address cohort imbalances and estimate the

62

risks of non-persistence (60-day gap), discontinuation (≥90-day gap), switching, and the odds

63

of adherence.

64

Results: 645 ixekizumab and 1,152 secukinumab users were followed for 13.7 and 16.3

65

months, respectively. Ixekizumab users showed higher persistence rate (54.8% vs. 45.1%,

66

P<0.001) and lower discontinuation rate (37.8% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001) than SEC. After

67

multivariable adjustment, Ixekizumab users had lower risks of non-persistence (HR 0.82,

68

95%CI 0.71-0.95) and discontinuation (HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.70-0.96), and higher odds of high

69

adherence to treatment measured by medication possession ratio≥80% (HR 1.31, 95%CI 1.07-

70

1.60). The risk of switching was similar between cohorts.

71

Limitations: Disease severity and clinical outcomes were unavailable.

72

Conclusion: Ixekizumab users demonstrated longer drug persistence, lower discontinuation

73

rate and risk of discontinuation, higher likelihood of adherence, and similar risk of switching

74

compared to secukinumab users in clinical practices.

5

75

Capsule summary

76



The article provides real-world data on ixekizumab and secukinumab use patterns in daily

77

practice, and shows that ixekizumab users, when compared to secukinumab users, remain

78

on drug longer.

79



These data provide practicing clinicians with real-world evidence regarding drug persistence

80

aiding their decision-making process when considering an IL-17A blocker for psoriasis

81

patients.

6

82

Introduction

83

For moderate-to-severe psoriasis, systemic therapies are indicated, but 77%-80% of patients on

84

conventional oral agents and 40-70% of patients on biologics switch therapies within 5 years

85

due to lack or loss of efficacy or adverse events.1-3 Effective treatment with biologics requires

86

continuous therapy; symptoms often recur within 2-4 months of discontinuation regardless of the

87

original treatment response.4,5 Among biologic users, 11%-51% discontinue therapy within the

88

first year, and treatment failure is associated with increased utilization of healthcare services.6-9

89

Two newer biologics for psoriasis, ixekizumab (IXE) and secukinumab (SEC), are IL-17A

90

inhibitors that were FDA-approved in 2016 and 2015, respectively.10,11 Both IXE and SEC have

91

demonstrated clinical superiority to placebo, etanercept, and ustekinumab in the treatment of

92

moderate-to-severe psoriasis.12-16 Few analyses on treatment patterns associated with these

93

medications in clinical practice have been reported in psoriasis patients. Here, we performed a

94

retrospective cohort study using real-world data to compare treatment adherence, persistence,

95

switching, discontinuation, and reinitiation between psoriasis patients prescribed IXE or SEC.

96

Methods

97

Data source

98

This analysis used administrative claims data from three IBM Watson Health MarketScan®

99

Databases: The Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (CCAE), the Medicare

100

Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits Database (MDCR), and the Early View Database

101

(EV) (July 1, 2014, to May 31, 2018). CCAE contains inpatient, outpatient, and outpatient

102

prescription drug claims of approximately 147.9 million employees and their dependents

103

covered under fee-for-service and managed care health plans between 1995 and 2017. MDCR

104

contains the same information of approximately 10.6 million retirees with Medicare

7

105

supplemental insurance paid for by employers between 1995 and 2017. EV includes the same

106

components as the CCAE and MDCR for the period of January-May 2018.

107

Data were obtained using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision,

108

Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes, Current Procedural Terminology 4th

109

edition codes, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, and National Drug

110

Codes.

111

Patient cohorts

112

Patients with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims ≥30 days apart for psoriasis (ICD-9-CM

113

diagnoses: 696.1x or ICD-10-CM diagnoses: L40.0-L40.4, L40.8) between July 1, 2015, and

114

May 31, 2018, were identified, excluding claims for diagnostic procedures. Patients were

115

required to have ≥1 claim for IXE or SEC between March 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, on or after

116

the first psoriasis diagnosis. The first drug claim set the index date, and patients were classified

117

as IXE and SEC users accordingly. Patients were ≥18 years old on the index date and had

118

continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits for 12 months before (baseline

119

period) and ≥6 months after the index date (follow-up period). Patients were excluded if they

120

had the index drug within 90 days before the index date or other approved indications for the

121

index medication during the pre-index period (ankylosing spondylitis for SEC; psoriatic arthritis

122

for IXE and SEC). Patients were followed for ≥6 months until inpatient death, end of database

123

enrollment, or study end (May 31, 2018), whichever came first.

124

Treatment pattern characteristics

125

Treatment persistence, adherence, switching, discontinuation, and re-initiation were assessed

126

during the variable follow-up period. Index treatment was considered persistent if treatment

127

gaps were <60 days. Persistence ended at the last days’ supply before the first 60-day gap. If a

128

patient's last days’ supply occurred <60 days from the end of their follow-up period, the

8

129

persistence end date was the last days’ supply, and no assumption about treatment was made

130

beyond that date. Allowable gaps of 45, 60, and 90 days have been used in treatment

131

persistence analyses for autoimmune disease biologics.17-19 In this study, 45- and 90-day gaps

132

were used as sensitivity analysis. Percentages of patients who were persistent during the

133

follow-up period and time on persistent treatment were reported.

134

The primary measure of adherence was medication possession ratio (MPR), and the secondary

135

measure was proportion of days covered (PDC). MPR and PDC were defined as the sum of

136

days’ supply during the follow-up period divided by the length of the follow-up. Overlapping

137

days’ supply between consecutive fills were appended for MPR and truncated for PDC. Mean

138

MPR and PDC and the percentage of highly adherent patients, defined as MPR or PDC ≥80%,

139

were reported.19

140

Discontinuation has been used as a measure for drug survival in prior studies.20,21 In this study,

141

discontinuation was defined as a gap in treatment of ≥90 days. A 90-day gap is commonly used

142

in claims-based studies of biologic discontinuation.22-24 The date of the last day supply before

143

the first 90-day gap was the discontinuation date. Restart was defined as having a new claim for

144

the index drug after discontinuation. Percentages of patients who discontinued and restarted

145

and the time from the index date to discontinuation and from discontinuation to restart were

146

reported.

147

Switching was defined as having a different systemic psoriasis drug as monotherapy for ≥30

148

days. Eligible agents included adalimumab, brodalumab, certolizumab, etanercept, guselkumab,

149

infliximab, IXE (for SEC users), SEC (for IXE users), ustekinumab, apremilast, acitretin,

150

cyclosporine, and methotrexate. If the new agent had <30 days overlapping with the index drug,

151

the switching date was set as the date of the first claim of the new therapy. If the overlapping

152

period was ≥30 days, the switching date was the first day supply date after the overlapping

153

period. For example, a patient who had drug A on days 1-60 and filled a 90-day prescription for

9

154

drug B on day 54 would be recorded as switching to drug B on day 54. By contrast, a patient

155

who had drug A on days 1-90 and filled a 90-day prescription for drug B on day 50 would be

156

recorded as switching to drug B on day 91. Gaps <90 days between the days’ supply of two

157

consecutive scripts were included in the determination of the length of overlapping period and

158

the initiation of new monotherapy. Percentages of patients who switched, the new agents, and

159

time from the index to switching were captured.

160

Covariates

161

Age, gender, geographic region, payer, and health plan type were measured on the index date.

162

Baseline clinical characteristics included Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (DCCI), comorbid

163

conditions (anxiety, coronary heart disease, depression, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension,

164

multiple sclerosis, obesity, osteoarthritis, other autoimmune disorders, peripheral vascular

165

disease, and sleep apnea), and all-cause and psoriasis-related healthcare costs. Baseline

166

psoriasis-related medication usage was reported, i.e., use of biologic (adalimumab, brodalumab,

167

certolizumab, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, IXE, SEC, or ustekinumab) and the number of

168

unique biologics, non-biologic systemic therapy (apremilast, acitretin, systemic steroids,

169

cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, hydroxyurea, isotretinoin, leflunomide, methoxsalen,

170

mycophenolate mofetil, sulfasalazine, or thioguanine), topical treatment, and phototherapy.

171

Statistical analysis

172

Bivariate analyses were conducted for all treatment pattern variables. Continuous measures

173

were reported as means and standard deviations. Categorical measures were presented as

174

percentages. To address cohort imbalances, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)

175

was employed via a logistic regression model, using IXE vs. SEC as the dependent variable.

176

Covariates included demographic and clinical variables (excepting multiple sclerosis, which

177

occurred in only 0.2-0.3% of patients) listed in the covariate section and pre-index psoriasis-

10

178

related costs. Cohort balances were evaluated by standardized difference (StdDiff), and a

179

StdDiff of ≤0.1 indicated good balance. For outcome variables, weighted data were reported,

180

and statistical significance was assessed using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and

181

two-sample t-tests for continuous variables.

182

Kaplan-Meier curves estimated the probability of persistent treatment for IXE and SEC users

183

using weighted data. Cox proportional hazard regression models were employed to estimate the

184

risks of treatment non-persistence, discontinuation, and switching. Logistic regression was used

185

to estimate the odds of being highly adherent to treatment based on MPR and PDC, adjusting

186

for baseline differences. The same covariates in the IPTW model were included in all

187

multivariable models with the inclusion of multiple sclerosis. All models were weighted by IPTW

188

and used a robust “sandwich” covariance approach to estimate standard error.25 Results were

189

reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A p-value of <0.05 was set a priori as the threshold

190

for statistical significance. Descriptive analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS

191

Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Weighted descriptive analyses, Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariable

192

analyses were generated with R version 3.5.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,

193

Austria).

194

Results

195

In total, 645 and 1,152 IXE and SEC users were selected (Fig 1). Before weighting, the IXE and

196

SEC cohorts had similar baseline demographic and clinical profiles (Table I). Both cohorts had a

197

mean age of 49-50±12 years, and roughly half were male. Baseline DCCI and total all-cause

198

and psoriasis-related healthcare costs were comparable between the cohorts. The most

199

common comorbidities were hypertension (39.1%–39.8%), hyperlipidemia (29.0%–34.1%), and

200

obesity (24.6%–24.8%). Prior biologic use was similar between IXE (66%) and SEC (68%)

201

users. All baseline characteristics were well-balanced after weighting. IXE and SEC users had a

202

mean follow-up of 13.7±5.1 and 16.1±6.3 months, respectively.

11

203

Bivariate analysis

204

A significantly higher proportion of IXE users, versus SEC users, remained persistent on

205

treatment throughout the variable follow-up period (54.8% vs. 45.1%, P<0.001) using a 60-day

206

gap (Table II). IXE users were also on persistent treatment for a larger proportion of the variable

207

follow-up period (71.5%±34.1% vs. 64.2%±36.1%, P<0.001) than SEC users. Kaplan-Meier

208

curves show that the rate of persistent treatment was consistently and significantly higher for

209

IXE than SEC over the whole follow-up period (P=0.007; Fig 2). The differences in the rate of

210

persistent treatment increased as follow-up time lengthened: 2% (71%/IXE and 69%/SEC) at 6

211

months, 7% (57%/IXE and 50%/SEC) at 12 months, and 10% (39%/IXE and 29%/SEC) at 24

212

months. This pattern was confirmed by sensitivity analyses using 45-day (P=0.029) and 90-day

213

gaps (P=0.011).

214

IXE users had a higher mean MPR (0.66±0.29 vs. 0.63±0.30, P=0.011) and adherence rate

215

(46.4% vs. 40.2%, P=0.014) than SEC users over an average follow-up of 13.7 and 16.1

216

months, respectively. Differences in mean PDC were directionally consistent with MPR but

217

statistically insignificant. Like MPR, the percentage of IXE users with PDC ≥80% was higher

218

than SEC users (38.3% vs. 32.4%, P=0.015).

219

Compared to SEC, IXE users had a lower discontinuation rate (37.8% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001).

220

Kaplan-Meier estimation showed one-year probability of survival from discontinuation was 0.63

221

and 0.56 for IXE and SEC respectively (P=0.009). IXE users also had lower restart rate after

222

discontinuation (5.0% vs. 10.0%, P<0.001). Among restarters, the mean time from

223

discontinuation to restart was 5.3±2.8 months for IXE and 5.8±3.3 months for SEC (P=0.312).

224

IXE users had a lower switching rate (19.2% vs. 24.2%, P=0.020) than SEC users. Kaplan-

225

Meier estimation showed one-year probability of remaining on index drug was 0.83 and 0.80 for

226

IXE and SEC respectively (P=0.190). The top agents that IXE users switched to were SEC

12

227

(3.4%), ustekinumab (3.4%), or guselkumab (2.6%); the most common switches for SEC users

228

were to IXE (8.7%), adalimumab (3.2%), or apremilast (3.1%).

229

Multivariable analyses

230

After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, IXE use was associated with an 18%

231

lower risk of non-persistence than SEC (HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.71–0.95) when using a 60-day gap

232

(Fig 3). Models using 45- and 90-day gaps showed consistent findings (HR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.75–

233

0.98 and HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.71–0.97, respectively). IXE users had 31% and 32% higher odds

234

of being highly adherent to index treatment as measured by MPR (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.07–

235

1.60) and PDC (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.63), respectively. Compared to SEC, IXE users had

236

18% lower risk of discontinuation (HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.70–0.96). The risk of switching was

237

numerically lower but not statistically significant (HR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.70–1.11).

238

Discussion

239

This retrospective cohort study compared real-world treatment patterns of psoriasis patients

240

treated with IXE or SEC. Compared to SEC users, IXE users had better persistence and a lower

241

discontinuation rate. After multivariable adjustment, IXE users demonstrated a lower risk of non-

242

persistence and discontinuation and a higher likelihood of treatment adherence than SEC users.

243

The risk of switching was similar between IXE and SEC users.

244

Treatment persistence of older biologics, such as adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and

245

ustekinumab, has been reported,7,21 but real-world data on IXE and SEC are limited. Recently,

246

several studies reported 24%-29% discontinuation rates within first year use of SEC.26,27 In a

247

Danish registry study, SEC had the shortest time to discontinuation compared to adalimumab,

248

etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab; however, only 21.5% of SEC users were bio-naïve,

249

compared with 52.7%–73.7% of patients taking other biologics.3 Prior biologic use is associated

250

with decreased future biologic drug survival.9,20 New biologics like IXE and SEC are more likely

13

251

to be used in bio-experienced patients.3 Nevertheless, it is notable that IXE users demonstrated

252

a significantly higher rate of drug survival than SEC users, as measured by discontinuation,

253

despite similar rates of prior biologic use. This study did not find statistically significant

254

differences in the risk of switching based on 14-16 months of follow-up. Future analysis using

255

more longitudinal data to explore the long-term switching outcomes along with other treatment

256

pattern outcomes would be of considerable interest.

257

In the 2018 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) evidence rating, a head-to-head

258

comparison between IXE and SEC placed IXE as “C+” and SEC as “C-“ based on indirect

259

evidence from meta-analyses.28 While it is not possible to measure treatment response based

260

on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) directly from claims data, drug treatment

261

patterns serves as a proxy for clinical benefits, since patient satisfaction with drug effectiveness

262

correlates with adherence.29 Currently, there are a lack of accurate measures of drug

263

persistence for newer biologic therapies.28 This real-world study fills the gap by providing direct

264

evidence of drug survival for IXE and SEC in clinical practice settings. Findings from this study

265

will benefit future cost-effectiveness models for the variety of available psoriasis therapies.

266

Limitations

267

This analysis relied on administrative claim data and thus was subject to data coding limitations

268

and data entry errors. The EV Database may miss 1%-3% of pharmacy claims due to shorter

269

adjudication period; however, this impacted both cohorts equally. Treatment pattern analysis

270

assumed patients took medications as prescribed. IPTW and multivariable modeling were

271

employed to address observable imbalances between patient cohorts, but not all relevant

272

covariates (e.g., psoriasis severity) are captured in claims data. Pre-index biologic use and

273

psoriasis-related healthcare costs were included in the models as proxy for severity, but

274

unobservable differences may remain. This study evaluated adherence using variable length

275

follow-up. While this approach has been used in prior publications,30,31 it has inherent limitations

14

276

when the length of follow-up is longer for one cohort than another, as in this study. Future

277

analysis using fixed-length follow-up is necessary to confirm the adherence findings. The data

278

sources used are limited to patients with commercial health coverage or private Medicare

279

supplemental coverage. The results may not be generalizable to the uninsured or those with

280

other types of insurance.

281

Conclusions

282

In real-world treatment settings, psoriasis patients prescribed either IXE or SEC had

283

comparable demographic and clinical profiles at treatment initiation. IXE users demonstrated

284

longer persistence and lower drug discontinuation rates than SEC users. After multivariable

285

adjustment IXE users had lower risk of non-persistence and discontinuation and higher

286

likelihood of treatment adherence than SEC users. The risk of switching was similar between

287

the cohorts. These findings may inform future treatment decisions for moderate-to-severe

288

psoriasis patients.

15

289

Abbreviations

290

CI:

confidence interval

291

HR:

hazard ratio

292

ICD-9/10-CM: International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification

293 294

IL:

interleukin

295

IPTW:

inverse probability of treatment weighting

296

IXE:

ixekizumab

297

MPR:

medication possession ratio

298

OR:

odds ratio

299

PDC:

proportion of days covered

300

SD:

standard deviation

301

SEC:

secukinumab

302

StdDiff:

standardized difference

16

303

Acknowledgments

304

Natalie N Boytsov, Ph.D., Meghan E Jones, MSPH, and Alan J M Brnabic, MSc, of Eli Lilly and

305

Company provided critical review of the analyses. Aswin Kalyanaraman and Arun Eswaran of

306

IBM Watson Health provided programming support for this project. Jessamine Winer-Jones,

307

Ph.D. of IBM Watson Health provided editorial support. These services were paid for by Eli Lilly

308

and Company.

17

309

References

310

1.

Shalom G, Zisman D, Harman-Boehm I, et al. Factors associated with drug survival of

311

methotrexate and acitretin in patients with psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol.

312

2015;95(8):973-977.

313

2.

Yeung H, Wan J, Van Voorhees AS, et al. Patient-reported reasons for the

314

discontinuation of commonly used treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am

315

Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(1):64-72.

316

3.

Egeberg A, Ottosen MB, Gniadecki R, et al. Safety, efficacy and drug survival of

317

biologics and biosimilars for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol.

318

2018;178(2):509-519.

319

4.

Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Sofen H, et al. Continuous dosing versus interrupted therapy with

320

ixekizumab: an integrated analysis of two phase 3 trials in psoriasis. J Eur Acad

321

Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(6):1004-1013.

322

5.

Brezinski EA, Armstrong AW. Off-label biologic regimens in psoriasis: a systematic

323

review of efficacy and safety of dose escalation, reduction, and interrupted biologic

324

therapy. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33486.

325

6.

Foster SA, Zhu B, Guo J, et al. Patient characteristics, health care resource utilization,

326

and costs associated with treatment-regimen failure with biologics in the treatment of

327

psoriasis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22(4):396-405.

328

7.

Murage MJ, Anderson A, Casso D, et al. Treatment patterns, adherence, and

329

persistence among psoriasis patients treated with biologics in a real-world setting,

330

overall and by disease severity. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018:1-9.

331 332

8.

Warren RB, Smith CH, Yiu ZZN, et al. Differential drug survival of biologic therapies for the treatment of psoriasis: a prospective observational cohort study from the British

18

333

Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR). J Invest

334

Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2632-2640.

335

9.

Iskandar IYK, Warren RB, Lunt M, et al. Differential drug survival of second-line biologic

336

therapies in patients with psoriasis: observational cohort study from the British

337

Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR). J Invest

338

Dermatol. 2018;138(4):775-784.

339

10.

Cosentyx® (secukinumab) BLA 125504/0 approval letter. 2015;

340

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2015/125504Orig1s000ltr.pdf

341

. Accessed October 25, 2018.

342

11.

Taltz® (ixekizumab) BLA 125521 approval letter. 2016;

343

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2016/125521Orig1s000ltr.pdf

344

. Accessed October 25, 2018.

345

12.

Papp KA, Leonardi CL, Blauvelt A, et al. Ixekizumab treatment for psoriasis: integrated

346

efficacy analysis of three double-blinded, controlled studies (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-

347

2, UNCOVER-3). Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(3):674-681.

348

13.

Mease PJ, van der Heijde D, Ritchlin CT, et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific

349

monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic

350

arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and

351

active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1. Ann Rheum Dis.

352

2017;76(1):79-87.

353

14.

of two phase 3 trials. New Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):326-338.

354 355

Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis — results

15.

Reich K, Pinter A, Lacour JP, et al. Comparison of ixekizumab with ustekinumab in

356

moderate-to-severe psoriasis: 24-week results from IXORA-S, a phase III study. Br J

357

Dermatol. 2017;177(4):1014-1023.

19

358

16.

Thaçi D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing

359

skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized

360

controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(3):400-409.

361

17.

rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Pharm Benefits. 2017;9(5):e1-e7.

362 363

Bonafede M, Johnson BH, Tan DH, et al. Compliance and cost of biologic therapies for

18.

Harnett J, Gerber R, Gruben D, et al. Evaluation of real-world experience with tofacitinib

364

compared with adalimumab, etanercept, and abatacept in RA patients with 1 previous

365

biologic DMARD: Data from a US administrative claims database. J Manag Care Spec

366

Pharm. 2016;22(12):1457-1471.

367

19.

Murage MJ, Tongbram V, Feldman SR, et al. Medication adherence and persistence in

368

patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature

369

review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1483-1503.

370

20.

Menter A, Papp K, Gooderham M, et al. Drug survival of biologic therapy in a large,

371

disease‐based registry of patients with psoriasis: results from the Psoriasis Longitudinal

372

Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(7):1148-

373

1158.

374

21.

systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;29(5):460-466.

375 376

No DJ, Inkeles MS, Amin M, et al. Drug survival of biologic treatments in psoriasis: a

22.

Doshi JA, Takeshita J, Pinto L, et al. Biologic therapy adherence, discontinuation,

377

switching, and restarting among patients with psoriasis in the US Medicare population. J

378

Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(6):1057-1065. e1054.

379

23.

Li P, Blum MA, Von Feldt J, et al. Adherence, discontinuation, and switching of biologic

380

therapies in Medicaid enrollees with rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health. 2010;13(6):805-

381

812.

20

382

24.

Johnston SS, McMorrow D, Farr AM, et al. Comparison of biologic disease-modifying

383

antirheumatic drug therapy persistence between biologics among rheumatoid arthritis

384

patients switching from another biologic. Rheumatol Ther. 2014;2(1):59-71.

385

25.

(IPTW) with survival analysis. Stat Med. 2016;35(30):5642-5655.

386 387

Austin PC. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting

26.

Georgakopoulos JR, Ighani A, Phung M, et al. Drug survival of secukinumab in real-

388

world plaque psoriasis patients: a 52-week, multicenter, retrospective study. J Am Acad

389

Dermatol. 2018;78(5):1019-1020.

390

27.

van den Reek J, van Vugt LJ, van Doorn MBA, et al. Initial results of secukinumab drug

391

survival in patients with psoriasis: a multicentre daily practice cohort study. Acta Derm

392

Venereol. 2018;98(7):648-654.

393

28.

Banken R, Foluso Agboola, Ellis A, et al. Targeted immunomodulators for the treatment

394

of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: effectiveness and value. 2018; 1-315. Available

395

at: https://icer-review.org/wp-

396

content/uploads/2017/11/ICER_Psoriasis_Update_Final_Evidence_Report_10042018.p

397

df. Accessed October 9, 2018.

398

29.

psoriasis: a systematic literature review. Br J Dermatol. 2012;168(1):20-31.

399 400

Thorneloe RJ, Bundy C, Griffiths CEM, et al. Adherence to medication in patients with

30.

Evans CD, Eurich DT, Lamb DA, et al. Retrospective observational assessment of statin

401

adherence among subjects patronizing different types of community pharmacies in

402

canada. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 2009;15(6):476-84.

403

31.

Shin S, Song H, Oh S-K, Choi KE, Kim H, Jang S. Effect of antihypertensive medication

404

adherence on hospitalization for cardiovascular disease and mortality in hypertensive

405

patients. Hypertens. Res. 2013;36(11):1000-1005.

21

406

Table I. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics before and after weighting. Before Weighting IXE

SEC

After Weighting StdDiff*

IXE

SEC

StdDiff*

N = 645 N = 1,152 Age, mean (SD)

49.9 (12.0)

49.1 (12.3)

0.068

49.4 (12.4)

49.4 (12.2)

0.001

Male, %

54.7%

50.0%

0.095

51.5%

51.7%

0.003

Commercial, %

91.8%

92.9%

0.041

92.2%

92.5%

0.011

Insurance Plan Type, %

0.192

0.062

Comprehensive/indemnity

4.5%

5.0%

5.3%

4.9%

HMO

5.0%

7.6%

7.0%

6.7%

POS/POS with capitation

12.2%

7.9%

9.2%

9.3%

PPO

59.2%

58.9%

58.5%

59.0%

Other (CHDP, HDHP, EPO, Unknown)

19.1%

20.6%

20.1%

20.1%

Geographic Region, %

0.151

0.059

Northeast

13.6%

16.1%

15.4%

15.3%

North Central

19.5%

18.6%

19.8%

19.0%

South

57.8%

52.9%

53.7%

54.4%

West

9.0%

12.2%

11.2%

11.1%

Unknown

0.0%

0.2%

0.0%

0.0%

Length of follow-up, mean (SD) Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean (SD)

13.7 (5.1) 16.1 (6.3)

0.418 13.7 (5.1) 16.1 (6.3)

0.413

0.5 (1.2)

0.6 (1.2)

0.070

0.6 (1.4)

0.6 (1.2)

0.009

12.6%

13.5%

0.027

13.1%

13.1%

0.001

6.5%

5.6%

0.040

6.4%

6.0%

0.016

Depression

12.1%

12.5%

0.012

12.7%

12.5%

0.007

Diabetes

17.1%

18.1%

0.029

17.0%

17.6%

0.015

Hyperlipidemia

34.1%

29.0%

0.110

30.5%

30.7%

0.004

Hypertension

39.8%

39.1%

0.016

38.5%

39.0%

0.011

0.2%

0.3%

n/a

0.1%

0.4%

n/a

Comorbid conditions, % Anxiety Coronary heart disease

Multiple sclerosis

22

Obesity

24.8%

24.6%

0.006

24.8%

24.6%

0.005

Osteoarthritis

10.2%

11.0%

0.026

11.5%

10.9%

0.018

Other autoimmune disorders

5.6%

6.3%

0.032

5.9%

6.0%

0.007

Peripheral vascular disease

0.8%

2.3%

n/a

1.8%

1.7%

n/a

12.9%

11.4%

0.046

11.8%

11.8%

0.000

65.7%

68.0%

0.047

67.9%

67.4%

0.010

Number of unique biologics, mean (SD)

0.7 (0.6)

0.8 (0.6)

0.091

0.8 (0.6)

0.8 (0.6)

0.022

Any systemic agents/targeted oral therapies, %

58.6%

58.9%

0.007

58.8%

58.9%

0.000

Any topical agents, %

73.3%

76.0%

0.062

75.4%

75.2%

0.004

6.7%

6.2%

0.021

6.8%

6.4%

0.015

$3,698 ($3,648)

$3,670 ($4,164)

0.007

$3,789 ($3,838)

$3,659 ($4,174)

0.032

Psoriasis-specific healthcare cost†, mean $2,707 $2,676 0.013 $2,697 $2,697 ($2,309) ($2,486) ($2,237) ($2,663) (SD) CDHP, consumer driven health plan; EPO, exclusive provider organization; HDHP, highdeductible health plan; HMO, health maintenance organization; IXE, ixekizumab; POS, point of service; PPO, preferred provider organization; SEC, secukinumab; SD, standard deviation; StdDiff, standardized difference.

0.000

Sleep apnea Treatments Any biologics, %

Phototherapy or laser treatments, % †

All-cause healthcare cost , mean (SD)

407 408 409 410 411 412 413

*A standardized difference of less than 0.1 is considered well balanced. † Reported per-person per-month.

23

414 415

Table II. Treatment patterns for the variable length follow-up period after weighting IXE

SEC

p-value

Persistence (60-day gap) Patients who were persistent, %

54.8%

45.1%

<0.001

Months on persistent treatment, mean (SD)

9.59 (5.92)

9.74 (6.58)

0.612

Percent of persistent days during follow-up period, mean (SD)

71.5% (34.1%)

64.2% (36.1%)

<0.001

0.66 (0.29)

0.63 (0.30)

0.011

46.4%

40.2%

0.014

0.62 (0.29)

0.59 (0.28)

0.071

38.3%

32.4%

0.015

37.8%

47.5%

<0.001

5.41 (4.13)

6.75 (5.17)

<0.001

5.0%

10.0%

<0.001

5.25 (2.82)

5.80 (3.26)

19.2%

24.2%

Adherence MPR, mean (SD) MPR ≥ 80%, % PDC, mean (SD) PDC ≥ 80%, % Discontinuation and Reinitiation Patients who discontinued, % Months to discontinuation, mean (SD) Patients who reinitiated, % Months from discontinuation to reinitiation, mean (SD)

0.312

Switching Patients who switched to another psoriasis treatment, % 416 417

0.02

Months to switching, mean (SD) 7.74 (4.59) 8.97 (5.58) 0.026 IXE, ixekizumab; MPR, medication possession ratio; PDC, proportion of days covered; SEC, secukinumab, SD, standard deviation.

24

418

Figure legends

419

Fig 1. Selection of ixekizumab and secukinumab treated psoriasis (PsO) patients.

420

Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier curve for probability of persistent treatment using a 60-day treatment gap.

421

IXE, ixekizumab; SEC, secukinumab.

422

Fig 3. Multivariable adjusted analysis of treatment patterns for the variable length follow-up

423

period. Reference group = SEC. CI, confidence interval; IXE, ixekizumab; MPR, medication

424

possession ratio; PDC, proportion of days covered; PsO, psoriasis; SEC, secukinumab.

425

Figure 1.

426 427

Figure 2.

25

428

26

429

430

Figure 3.