Alternative acid-functional monomer and its pH influence on the enamel

Alternative acid-functional monomer and its pH influence on the enamel

e83 d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 0 S ( 2 0 1 4 ) e1–e180 similar efficacy of polymerization, however CQ shows higher SS. Composites containing BAP...

67KB Sizes 0 Downloads 17 Views

e83

d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 0 S ( 2 0 1 4 ) e1–e180

similar efficacy of polymerization, however CQ shows higher SS. Composites containing BAPO show superior quality of polymerization and lower SS when compared to CQ and PPD. The co-initiator is necessary for composites containing CQ or PPD, but not for composites containing BAPO. BAPO is a suitable substitute for CQ, as a photoinitiator in resin composites.

169

Keywords: Camphorquinone; Photoinitiator; Composite

1

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.168 168 Alternative acid-functional monomer and its pH influence on the enamel A.F. Da Silva ∗ , E.A. Münchow, M. Barbosa, G.S. Lima, F.A. Ogliari, E. Piv Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil Purpose: The aim of this study was to synthesize an alternative acidic monomer (polypropylene glycol phosphate methacrylate – Poly-P) to constitute experimental two-step self-etch adhesive systems and to evaluate its influence on the pH and microshear bond strength (␮SBS) to enamel. Methods and materials: Four primers containing Poly-P (10, 15, 30 or 50 wt%), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), ethanol, and water were prepared, which were allocated in two subgroups according to an adjusted (buffered) or non-adjusted (non-buffered) pH. One experimental control and one commercial (ClearfillTM SE Bond) references were used. ␮SBS protocol was performed at human enamel, followed by mechanical testing (EMIC). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was performed after each primer application. Data was analyzed by One-Way Kruskall–Wallis and Student-Newman–Keuls tests (p < 0.05) and by linear regression predictive models. Results: As greater the Poly-P content, the lower the primer’s pH. Buffered groups showed lower ␮SBS values than non-buffered groups. Groups with Poly-P content equal or higher than 30 wt% showed similar ␮SBS results when compared to the controls. SEM images demonstrated that only primers with high Poly-P content (30 and 50 wt%) etched enamel in a more evidenced Type 1 (prisms exposure) etching pattern. Conclusion: The pH of the primer was directly influenced by the concentration of acidic monomer, which directly affected the enamel bond strength results. Poly-P is a potential monomer to be used in the formulation of self-etch dental adhesive systems. Keywords: Dental adhesive; Micro-shear bond strength; Selfetching

Polymerization of self-etching resin-cements: Effect of storage time and light-curing-technique B. Dimarco 1 , C. Solomon 2 , R. Franc¸a 1,∗ Dental Biomaterials Research Laboratory, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba – Winnipeg, Canada 2 Prosthodontics Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba – Winnipeg, Canada

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the degree of conversion of four self-etching resin cements according to two light curing sources and during three different periods of time. Methods and materials: Four different commercial brands of self-etching resin cements were used (n = 6): RelyX Unicem 2 (3M Inc.), Bifix SE (Voco GmbH), BisCem (Bisco, Inc.) and Embrace WetBond (Pulpdent Inc). For these Resin Cements, two different polymerization techniques were used: quartztungsten-halogen (QTH) light curing (Max Caulk, Dentsply) versus light-emitting diode (LED) curing (Valo Cordless, Ultradent Products Inc). All cements were manipulated and applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The QTH light had an intensity of 450 mW/cm2 , and the LED light had an intensity of 750 mW/cm2 . After polymerization, samples were stored at 37 ◦ C. Degree of conversion (DC) data was recorded in three different time increments: 10 min, 24 h and 15 days. The DC was performed using a Fourier Transformation Infrared (FTIR; Nicoler-6700). DC was calculated utilizing C C (1640 cm−1 ) and C C (1608 cm−1 ) ratio between polymerized and unpolymerized resin cements. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: Table below reports the average percent (DC) and the standard deviation. Curing

Time

RelyX 2

Bifix SE

BisCEm

Embrace

LED

10 min 31.0 (±6.4) 24 h 34.0 (±5.2) 15 days 37.4 (±1.7)

29.5 (±2.0) 21.6 (±3.0) 27.5 (±5.2)

29.5 (±2.0) 38.4 (±3.0) 32.2 (±5.2)

13.1 (±1.9) 17.8 (±3.0) 22.6 (±6.7)

QTH

10 min 31.5 (±3.4) 24 h 36.9 (±4.2) 15 days 35.7 (±3.0)

23.5 (±3.1) 30.3 (±1.9) 28.2 (±5.5)

23.5 (±5.2) 30.3 (±1.9) 28.1 (±5.4)

29.7 (±3.9) 30.4 (±3.1) 28.1 (±5.6)

Conclusion: Factors: Light curing technique, storage time and resin cements and the interaction between them are significantly different (p < 0.05). Depending on the brand, the choice of the light curing technique should be used to improve the degree of conversion. Keywords: Self-etching resin cements; Degree of conversion

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.170