Antimicrobial peptide defenses against pathogens associated with global amphibian declines

Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72 www.elsevier.com/locate/devcompimm

Antimicrobial peptide defenses against pathogens associated with global amphibian declines Louise A. Rollins-Smith a,*, Jennifer K. Doersam a, Joyce E. Longcore b, Sharon K. Taylor c, Jessica C. Shamblin a, Cynthia Carey d, Michael A. Zasloff e a

Departments of Microbiology and Immunology and of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA b Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA c US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27111, USA d Department of Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA e Magainin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462, USA Received 12 March 2001; received in revised form 29 May 2001; accepted 7 June 2001

Abstract Global declines of amphibian populations are a source of great concern. Several pathogens that can infect the skin have been implicated in the declines. The pathogen most frequently associated with recent die-offs is a chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. A second fungus, Basidiobolus ranarum, was isolated from declining populations of Wyoming toads. A third pathogen, Aeromonas hydrophila, is an opportunistic bacterium found in healthy frogs, but capable of inducing disease. Among the immune defense mechanisms used by amphibians is the production of antimicrobial peptides in granular glands in the skin. These packets of natural antibiotics can be emptied onto the skin when the amphibian is injured. To determine whether antimicrobial skin peptides defend against these amphibian pathogens, six peptides (magainin I, magainin II, PGLa, CPF, ranalexin, and dermaseptin), from three species, and representing three structurally different families of peptides, were tested in growth inhibition assays. We show here that the peptides can kill or inhibit growth of both fungi but not Aeromonas. Although each peptide varied in its effectiveness, at least one from each species was effective against both fungi at a concentration of about 10±20 mM. This is the ®rst direct evidence that antimicrobial peptides in the skin can operate as a ®rst line of defense against the organisms associated with global amphibian declines. It suggests that this innate defense mechanism may play a role in preventing or limiting infection by these organisms. q 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Amphibians; Amphibian declines; Antimicrobial peptides; Batrachochytrium; Chytrid; Frog; Magainin; Ranalexin

1. Introduction Amphibian populations have been declining in many parts of the world since the 1960s (reviewed in Refs. [1±3]). The mass mortalities were ®rst docu* Corresponding author. Tel.: 11-615-343-4119; fax: 11-615343-8648. E-mail address: [email protected] (L.A. Rollins-Smith).

mented in the 1970s with toads and frogs in the western US [4±9], southern Canada [10,11], and Brazil [12,13]. Mass mortalities in Central America and Australia have been described more recently. The die-offs in these areas, and in the US, are continuing [14±19]. Many possible causes for amphibian population declines have been proposed. A review of the patterns of declines suggests that, along with man-made changes like habitat destruction and introduction of

0145-305X/01/$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S 0145-305 X(01)00 041-6

64

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

xenobiotics, one or more emerging diseases may be responsible for recent declines [1,2]. Much effort has gone into a search for possible pathogens that could be the cause of mortality in these populations. Four pathogens have been identi®ed that appear to meet the strict criteria set by microbiologists to establish a microbial pathogen as the cause of a disease (reviewed in Ref. [1]). The pathogen most frequently associated with recent amphibian die-offs is a newly described chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, named for the blue poison dart frog (Dendrobates auratus) from which it was isolated [17,20,21]. A second fungus was isolated from clinically ill individuals from declining populations of Wyoming toads (Bufo baxteri) and was identi®ed as Basidiobolus ranarum [22,23]. This fungus is a common inhabitant in the gut of amphibians [24±26], and it has been reported to be pathogenic for humans [27±29]. Mass die-offs of tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) in Arizona and the common frog (Rana temporaria) in England appear to be caused by a third kind of pathogen. The pathogen causing these die-offs is characterized as an iridovirus based on morphology and host pathology [30,31]. A fourth pathogen associated with amphibian declines is the bacterium Aeromonas hydrophila. It appears to be an opportunist found on the skin and in the digestive tracts of healthy frogs [32], but capable of inducing disease in South African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) [33] and American toads (Bufo americanus) [34], especially when the animals are stressed [35,36]. All of the organisms described above can infect the skin. The chytrid fungus colonizes keratinized epithelium [17,20,21]. Basidiobolus can be transmitted to healthy toads by direct exposure of abraded skin [23]. The skin, as well as liver, can be colonized by the iridoviruses [30,31]. A. hydrophila is found on the skin and in the digestive tracts [32,33]. Thus, the skin as a defensive barrier seems to be central to protection from each of these pathogens. Little is known about immune defense mechanisms in amphibian skin. However, one defense mechanism that has generated interest is the production of antimicrobial peptides by specialized granular glands in the skin of many amphibians (reviewed in Refs. [37,38]). A growing number of these antimicrobial peptides, with sizes ranging from 10 to 46 amino acid residues, have been described. Each species appears to produce its

own unique set of peptides with activity against a variety of organisms [39]. To understand the possible involvement of antimicrobial peptides produced by the granular glands in preventing or limiting infection by skin pathogens, we tested the activity of six peptides derived from three species. The peptides tested were magainin I, magainin II [40], PGLa (peptide with amino terminal glycine and carboxyl terminal leucinamide) [41], CPF (caerulein precursor fragment) [42], ranalexin [43], and dermaseptin [44]. The magainins, PGLa, and CPF were originally isolated from X. laevis and form linear a -helices that have wide spectrum antimicrobial activity [37±42]. Ranalexin was identi®ed in the skin of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) [43]. It differs from the others because of two cysteine residues at positions 1 and 7, when counting from the carboxyl terminus. This peptide is homologous to the brevinins from the skin of Rana brevipoda porsa [45] and other species of Rana [46], the pipinins isolated from Rana pipiens [47], and the esculentins isolated from Rana esculenta [48,49]. Dermaseptin comes from the skin of Phyllomedusa sauvagii. Like the magainins, it forms a linear a -helix and has broadspectrum antimicrobial activity [37,44]. Although these peptides have been tested against mammalian pathogens in a search for novel antimicrobials, they have not previously been tested against amphibian pathogens. We show here that all of the peptides tested can inhibit growth of B. dendrobatidis and B. ranarum but not A. hydrophila. This study is the ®rst demonstration that skin-derived antimicrobial peptides can deter the growth of the speci®c pathogens associated with amphibian declines and suggests that this innate defense mechanism may play a role in preventing or limiting infection.

2. Materials and methods 2.1. Culture and maintenance of pathogens B. dendrobatidis was isolated from a diseased blue poison dart frog (D. auratus) by J.E.L. [20]. It was grown on TGhL agar (16 g tryptone, 4 g gelatin hydrolysate, 2 g lactose, and 10 g agar per 1 l of glass distilled water) or in H broth (10 g tryptone

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

and 3.2 g glucose per 1 l of glass distilled water) at 22±238C. Broth cultures were passaged twice weekly to assure that cells were in an active phase of growth. B. ranarum was isolated from diseased Wyoming toads by S.K.T. [22,23]. It was grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Difco 0109-17) (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) at 238C. For growth inhibition assays in broth, it was sub-cultured from agar to Sabouraud dextrose broth and maintained on a rotating wheel. Under these conditions, the mycelium grows as a ball-like cluster and releases single-celled spores into the broth. Only the spores were used for growth inhibition assays. A. hydrophila was isolated from diseased Wyoming toads by S.K.T. [22,36]. A second isolate from the American type culture collection (isolate 43408) was also tested. Both isolates were grown in nutrient broth (Difco 0003) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI USA) at 308C. 2.2. Growth inhibition assays The growth inhibition assays were adapted from an assay described by Mor and Nicolas [50]. For growth inhibition of fungal cells, 5 £ 10 4 cells in a volume of 50 ml of broth were plated in replicates of ®ve or more in a 96-well microtiter plate with or without addition of 50 ml serial dilutions of each peptide in broth (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA). Positive control wells received 50 ml of broth without peptide, and negative control wells (on a separate plate) received 50 ml of broth containing 0.4% paraformaldehyde [50]. Growth at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h (238C) was measured as increased optical density at 492 nm with an ELISA plate reader. For growth inhibition studies of A. hydrophila, 50 ml of bacteria, at a concentration of 1 £ 10 8/ ml, were plated in replicates of ®ve or more in a 96well microtiter plate with or without addition of 50 ml of serial dilutions of each antimicrobial peptide in water. Positive control wells received 50 ml water, negative control wells (on a separate plate) received 50 ml of 0.4% paraformaldehyde in water [50]. Growth was measured at 24 and 48 h as increased optical density at 492 nm with an ELISA plate reader. 2.3. Peptides Magainin I, magainin II, ranalexin, and dermaseptin were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO, USA). Magainin II, PGLa, and CPF were a

65

generous gift of Magainin Pharmaceuticals (Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA). The CPF used in these experiments is a variant with residue 20 changed from Met to Leu. All peptides were dissolved in glass distilled water, ®lter sterilized, and frozen in small aliquots at high concentration (usually 1.0 mg/ml) at 2708C and used at various dilutions for culture. For growth inhibition of A. hydrophila, the peptides were diluted in sterile distilled water. For the fungal growth inhibition assays, the peptides were diluted in broth. 3. Results 3.1. Peptide-induced growth inhibition of B. dendrobatidis Growth of B. dendrobatidis was signi®cantly inhibited at 48 h of culture at concentrations of about 50± 100 mM of the magainins (Fig. 1(a) and (b)), 12.5 mM of CPF (Fig. 1(c)), and 100 mM of PGLa (Fig. 1(d)). Similarly, dermaseptin, at about 23 mM (Fig. 1(e)), and ranalexin, at about 9 mM (Fig. 1(f)), signi®cantly inhibited growth. Both mature fungal cells and ¯agellated zoospores were included in the cultures. Thus, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) shown for CPF, PGLa, dermaseptin, and ranalexin are indicative of complete growth inhibition of all stages of the life cycle (Fig. 1(c)±(f)). The relationship of O.D.492 to relative cell numbers can be expressed as follows: When mature cells are plated at a concentration of 5 £ 10 5/ml, the initial O.D.492 readings are about 1±2 £ 10 22. After culture for 48 h, the O.D.492 has increased to about 8±10 £ 10 22. This corresponds to a concentration of mature cells of about 5 £ 10 6/ml. Growth inhibition that results in a decrease of O.D.492 to 4±5 £ 10 22 represents a loss of about half of the cells (data not shown). 3.2. Peptide-induced growth inhibition of B. ranarum Growth of B. ranarum was signi®cantly inhibited at 48±96 h of culture by relatively low concentrations of magainin I (7.8 mM) (Fig. 2(a)), magainin II (2.0 mM) (Fig. 2(b)), CPF (3.1 mM) (Fig. 2(c)), PGLa (3.1 mM) (Fig. 2(d)), dermaseptin (22.8 mM) (Fig. 2(e)), and ranalexin (9.4 mM) (Fig. 2(f)). Although growth was inhibited at these lower concentrations, much higher concentrations were required to completely eliminate

66

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

Fig. 1. Growth inhibition of B. dendrobatidis at 48 h by: (a) magainin I; (b) magainin II; (c) CPF; (d) PGLa; (e) dermaseptin; and (f) ranalexin. Each data point represents the mean ^ SE of replicate wells. If no error bar is shown, the SE was less than the diameter of the symbol. *Signi®cantly less growth than positive controls (one-tailed Student's t-test, P # 0.025). The results are representative of four assays of magainin I, 11 assays of magainin II, four assays of CPF, ®ve assays of PGLa, three assays of dermaseptin, and three assays of ranalexin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration at which no growth was detected.

growth of both Batrachochytrium (Fig. 3(a)) and Basidiobolus (Fig. 3(b)) during 4 days of culture. For example, although the growth of Batrachochytrium and Basidiobolus was signi®cantly inhibited at 24 and 48 h by 12.5 mM of CPF or magainin II, signi®cant growth was detectable at later time points (Fig. 3(a) and (b)). This pattern was also observed with other peptides and suggests that some cells can

escape the effects of lower concentrations of antimicrobial peptides. 3.3. Lack of peptide-induced growth inhibition of A. hydrophila In contrast to their effects on both fungal pathogens, none of the peptides tested inhibited growth of an isolate

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

67

Fig. 2. Growth inhibition of B. ranarum by: (a) magainin I and (b) magainin II at 48 h; (c) CPF and (d) PGLa at 96 h; (e) dermaseptin and (f) ranalexin at 48 h. Each data point represents the mean ^ SE of replicate wells. If no error bar is shown, the SE was less than the diameter of the symbol. *Signi®cantly less than positive controls (one-tailed Student's t-test, P # 0.05). The results are representative of three assays of magainin I, six assays of magainin II, one assay of CPF, two assays of PGLa, two assays of dermaseptin, and two assays of ranalexin. MIC is the lowest concentration at which no growth was detected.

of A. hydrophila collected from diseased Wyoming toads (B. baxteri) [22,36]. Magainin II, PGLa, and CPF were tested at concentrations of 1.6±100 mM. Magainin I was tested at 0.2±75 mM, dermaseptin at 0.2±34.0 mM, and ranalexin at 0.3±18.8 mM (data not shown). A second isolate from the American type culture collection (isolate 43408) was also resistant to magainin I, magainin II, ranalexin, and dermaseptin at concentrations of about 0.2±18.8 mM (data not shown).

3.4. Synergistic effects of magainin II and PGLa Because antimicrobial peptides are naturally produced and released in the skin as mixtures of peptides [38], we tested, in combination, the activity of two peptides derived from the skin of X. laevis. When tested individually against B. dendrobatidis, both magainin II and PGLa inhibited growth only at a relatively high concentration (100 mM). However, when added

68

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

Fig. 3. Growth inhibition of (a) B. dendrobatidis by CPF and (b) B. ranarum by magainin II over a period of 96 h. PF ˆ 0.4% paraformaldehyde. Each vertical bar represents the mean ^ SE of replicate wells.

together to a culture of B. dendrobatidis (at a ratio of 1:1), inhibition was synergistic. That is, concentrations as low as 6.25 mM of each peptide (12.5 mM total) were signi®cantly inhibitory (Fig. 4(a)). When tested individually against B. ranarum, magainin II inhibited at a concentration of about 12.5 mM, and PGLa inhibited at a concentration of about 3.1 mM. However, when added together at a 1:1 ratio in culture, they were completely inhibitory at a concentration of 0.4 mM of each peptide (0.8 mM total) (Fig. 4(b)). The peptides failed to inhibit growth of A. hydrophila, alone or in

combination, at concentrations as high as 50 mM of each peptide (100 mM total) (Fig. 4(c)). 4. Discussion All of the organisms examined in this study are able to infect amphibian skin. Thus, the skin as a defensive barrier is central to protection from these pathogens. We have shown here that representative antimicrobial peptides derived from the skin of three species of

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

Fig. 4. Synergistic growth inhibition by magainin II and PGLa of (a) B. dendrobatidis and (b) B. ranarum at 96 h of culture, but not (c) A. hydrophila at 48 h of culture. Each data point represents the mean ^ SE of replicate wells. If no error bar is shown, the SE was less than the diameter of the symbol. *Concentrations at which synergistic effects were observed. Synergism is de®ned as the concentration at which a 1:1 molar ratio of both peptides is more inhibitory than an equal concentration of either peptide alone (one-tailed Student's t-test, P # 0.025).

69

70

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

frogs can kill or inhibit the growth of both fungal species but not Aeromonas. Although each peptide varied in its pattern of effectiveness, at least one peptide from each species was effective against both fungi at a concentration of about 10±20 mM. Almost nothing is known about the concentrations of antimicrobial peptides present on the skin of healthy resting amphibians, but the concentration released in skin secretions following electrical stimulation or treatment with adrenergic agents can exceed 1 mg/ml ([51]; M. Zasloff, unpublished observation). The mechanism of action of a limited number of peptides has been studied in detail. In general, the cationic antimicrobial peptides, such as magainin, are thought to act by binding to the cell membrane and self-associating to form a membrane channel or pore (reviewed in Ref. [52]). Magainin II and PGLa, derived from X. laevis, acted synergistically against the fungi, but not Aeromonas. The mechanism for this synergism between magainin II and PGLa has been studied using arti®cial phospholipid bilayers surrounding ¯uid droplets (liposomes). The synergism was due to the formation of a two-peptide complex in which the peptides were represented at a 1:1 ratio in the arti®cial membrane. This association resulted in rapid and stable membrane pore formation. Magainin alone formed pores slowly. PGLa alone formed unstable pores [53]. It is likely that a mixture of peptides would be more effective on the skin surface than individual peptides. Thus, at least some species of amphibians have antimicrobial peptide defenses in the skin that should serve as a ®rst line of defense against fungal pathogens. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrating that peptide secretions were increased after exposure of frogs to environmental pathogens supports a role for antimicrobial skin peptides in defense against such microbes [54]. Although growth of Batrachochytrium and Basidiobolus was inhibited, growth of A. hydrophila, a frequent resident on the skin of healthy frogs [32], was not inhibited. Preliminary experiments also suggest that the magainins do not reduce infectivity of a salamander iridovirus (Ambystoma tigrinum Virus), when applied to high titer virus preparations at 50 mg/ml (about 15 mM) (T. O'Connor and E. Davidson, personal communication). In contrast, both esculentin-2P and ranatuerin-2P, derived from

the skin of R. pipiens, effectively inhibit plaque formation by another iridovirus (frog virus 3) when used at a concentration of 50 mM (V.G. Chinchar and L. Rollins-Smith unpublished observation). More complete studies of the effectiveness of these antimicrobial peptides in defense against iridovirus infections are underway. Presumably, other components of amphibian immune defenses (such as antibodies and T-cell mediated responses) must be responsible for defense against certain bacterial and viral pathogens resistant to antimicrobial peptides. None of the peptides tested in this study were derived from species that are currently in decline, and very little is know about the antimicrobial peptide defenses of species that are undergoing declines. However, caerin 1.1, a major defensive peptide found in the skin of Australian tree frogs (Litoria splendida, Litoria gilleni, and Litoria caerulea) can inhibit B. dendrobatidis zoospore motility and encystment of sporangia at concentrations of 50±100 mg/ml (L. Berger, J. Bowie, and A. Hyatt, personal communication). One of these species, L. caerulea, is experiencing mass mortality due to chytridiomycosis [17]. Future studies must determine whether declining species have less effective antimicrobial peptide defenses against Batrachochytrium than thriving species. If healthy members of declining species are shown to possess a repertoire of antimicrobial peptides that are effective against this pathogen, it will be critical to determine whether these defenses are impaired by environmental factors (such as UV-B or toxic chemicals). Environmental factors may, directly or indirectly, inhibit optimal synthesis or secretion of peptides. For example, stress that elevates glucocorticoids may inhibit peptide production and release [54±56]. Additional research is urgently needed to understand the nature of the immune defenses in amphibian skin, the mechanisms used by each pathogen to subvert those defenses, and the effects of environmental factors on the interplay of pathogen and host defenses. Acknowledgements This research was supported by an Integrated Research Challenges in Environmental Biology (IRCEB) grant IBN-9977063 from the National

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

Science Foundation (James P. Collins, P.I.). Jessica C. Shamblin and Jennifer K. Doersam were supported by a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) supplement to grant IBN 9809876 (to LR-S). Preliminary studies reported by T. O'Connor and E. Davidson were supported by a grant for undergraduate research to Arizona State University from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

References [1] Carey C, Cohen N, Rollins-Smith L. Amphibian declines: an immunological perspective. Dev Comp Immunol 1999;23:459±72. [2] Daszak P, Berger L, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD, Green DE, Spear R. Emerging infectious diseases and amphibian population declines. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:735±48. [3] Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 2000;404:752±5. [4] Corn PS, Fogelman JC. Extinctions of montane populations of the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) in Colorado. J Herpetol 1984;18:147±52. [5] Bradford DB. Mass mortality and extinction in a high-elevation population of Rana mucosa. J Herpetol 1991;25:174±7. [6] Carey C. Hypothesis concerning the causes of the disappearance of boreal toads from the mountains of Colorado. Cons Biol 1993;7:355±62. [7] Kagarise Sherman C, Morton ML. Population declines of Yosemite toads in the eastern Sierra Nevada of California. J Herpetol 1993;27:186±98. [8] Bradford DF, Graber DM, Tabatabai F. Population declines of the native frog Rana mucosa, in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California. Southwestern Nat 1994;39:323±7. [9] Drost CA, Fellers GM. Collapse of regional frog fauna in the Yosemite area of the California Sierra Nevada. Cons Biol 1996;10:414±25. [10] Roberts WE. What happened to the leopard frogs? Alberta Nat 1981;11:1±4. [11] Koonz W. Amphibians in Manitoba. In: Bishop CA, Pettit KE, editors. Declines in Canadian amphibian populations: designing a national monitoring strategy. Ottawa: Canadian Wildlife Service, 1992. p. 19±20. [12] Heyer WR, Rand AS, da Cruz Goncalves CA, Peixoto OL. Decimations, extinctions, and colonizations of the frog populations in southeast Brazil and their evolutionary implications. Biotropica 1988;20:230±5. [13] Weygoldt P. Changes in the composition of mountain stream frog communities in the Atlantic mountains of Brazil: frogs as indicators of environmental deterioration? Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 1989;243:249±55. [14] Trenerry MP, Laurance WF, McDonald KR. Further evidence for the precipitous decline of endemic rainforest frogs in tropical Australia. Pac Cons Biol 1994;1:150±3.

71

[15] Pounds JA, Crump ML. Amphibian declines and climate disturbance: the case of the golden toad and the harlequin frog. Cons Biol 1994;8:72±85. [16] Laurance WF, McDonald KR, Speare R. Epidemic disease and the catastrophic decline of Australian rainforest frogs. Cons Biol 1996;10:406±13. [17] Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Goggin CL, Slocombe R, Ragan MA, Hyatt AD, McDonald KR, Hines HB, Lips KR, Marantelli G, Parkes H. Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:9031±6. [18] Lips KR. Decline of tropical montane amphibian fauna. Cons Biol 1998;12:106±17. [19] Lips KR. Mass mortality and population declines of anurans at an upland site in western Panama. Cons Biol 1999;13:117±25. [20] Longcore JE, Pessier AP, Nichols DK. Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis gen. et sp. nov., a chytrid pathogenic to amphibians. Mycologia 1999;91:219±27. [21] Pessier AP, Nichols DK, Longcore JE, Fuller MS. Cutaneous chytridiomycosis in poison dart frogs (Dendrobates spp. and White's tree frogs (Litorea caerulea). J Vet Diagn Invest 1999;11:194±9. [22] Taylor SK, Williams ES, Thorne ET, Mills KW, Withers DI, Peir AC. Causes of mortality of the Wyoming toad. J Wildlife Dis 1999;35:49±57. [23] Taylor SK, Williams ES, Mills KW. Experimental exposure of Canadian toads to Basidiobolus ranarum. J Wildlife Dis 1999;35:58±63. [24] Gugnani HC, Okafor JI. Mycotic ¯ora of the intestine and other internal organs of certain reptiles and amphibians with special reference to characterization of Basidiobolus isolates. Mykosen 1980;23:260±8. [25] Okafor JI, Testrake D, Mushinsky HR, Yangco BG. A Basidiobolus sp. and its association with reptiles and amphibians in southern Florida. Sabouraudia 1984;22:47±51. [26] Feio CL, Bauwens L, Swinne D, De Meurichy W. Isolation of Basidiobolus ranarum from ectotherms in Antwerp zoo with special reference to characterization of the isolated strains. Mycoses 1999;42:291±6. [27] Davis SR, Ellis DH, Goldwater P, Dimitriou S, Byard R. First human culture-proven Australian case of entomophthoromycosis caused by Basidiobolus ranarum. J Med Vet Mycol 1994;32:225±30. [28] Pasha TM, Leighton JA, Smilack JD, Heppell J, Colby TV, Kaufman L. Basidiobolomycosis: an unusual fungal infection mimicking in¯ammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1997;112:250±4. [29] Zavasky DM, Samowitz W, Loftus T, Segal H, Carroll K. Gastrointestinal zygomycotic infection caused by Basidiobolus ranarum: case report and review. Clin Infec Dis 1999;28:1244±8. [30] Cunningham AA, Langton TES, Bennett PM, Lewin JF, Drury SEN, Gough RE, MacGregor SK. Pathological and microbiological ®ndings from incidents of unusual mortality of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Phil Trans R Soc London B 1996;351:1539±57.

72

L.A. Rollins-Smith et al. / Developmental and Comparative Immunology 26 (2002) 63±72

[31] Jancovich JK, Davidson EW, Morado JF, Jacobs BL, Collins JP. Isolation of a lethal virus from the endangered tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum stebbinsi. Dis Aquat Org 1997;31:161±7. [32] Hird DW, Diesch SL, McKinnell RG, Gorham E, Morton FB, Kurtz SW, Dubrovolny C. Aeromonas hydrophila in wildcaught frogs and tadpoles (Rana pipiens) in Minnesota. Lab Anim Sci 1981;31:166±9. [33] Hubbard GB. Aeromonas hydrophila infection in Xenopus laevis. Lab Anim Sci 1981;31:297±300. [34] Dusi JL. The natural occurrence of ªredlegª Pseudomonas hydrophila, in a natural population of American toads, Bufo americanus. Ohio J Sci 1949;49:70±71. [35] Carr AA, Amborski RL, Culley DD, Amborski GF. Aerobic bacteria in the intestinal tracts of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) maintained at low temperatures. Herpetologia 1976;32:239± 44. [36] Taylor SK, Williams ES, Mills KW. Effects of malathion on disease susceptibility in Woodhouse's toads. J Wildlife Dis 1999;35:536±41. [37] Nicolas P, Mor A. Peptides as weapons against microorganisms in the chemical defense system of vertebrates. Annu Rev Microbiol 1995;49:277±304. [38] Anderson M, Zasloff M. In: Gallin JI, Snyderman R, editors. In¯ammation: basic principles and clinical correlates. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999. p. 1279±92. [39] Amiche M, Aurelia AS, Thierry NP, Nicolas P. The dermaseptin precursors: a protein family with a common preproregion and a variable C-terminal antimicrobial domain. FEBS Lett 1999;456:352±6. [40] Zasloff M. Magainins, a class of antimicrobial peptides from Xenopus laevis skin: isolation characterization of two active forms and partial cDNA sequence of a precursor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:5449±53. [41] Andreu D, Aschauer H, Kreil G, Merri®eld RB. Solid-phase synthesis of PYLa and isolation of its natural counterpart PGLa [PYLa-(4-24)] from skin secretion of Xenopus laevis. Eur J Biochem 1985;149:531±5. [42] Richter K, Egger R, Kreil G. Sequence of preprocaerulein cDNAs cloned from skin of Xenopus laevis. A small family of precursors containing one, three, or four copies of the ®nal product. J Biol Chem 1986;261:3676±80. [43] Clark DP, Durell S, Maloy WL, Zasloff M. Ranalexin: a novel antimicrobial peptide from bullfrog Rana catesbeiana skin, structurally related to the bacterial antibiotic polymyxin. J Biol Chem 1994;269:10849±55.

[44] Mor A, Nguyen VH, Delfour A, Migliore-Samour D, Nicolas P. Isolation, amino acid sequence and synthesis of dermaseptin, a novel antimicrobial peptide of amphibian skin. Biochemistry 1991;30:8824±30. [45] Morikawa N, Hagiwara K, Nakajima T. Brevinin-1 and 2, unique antimicrobial peptides from the skin of the frog Rana brevipoda porsa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992;189:184±90. [46] Goraya J, Knoop FC, Conlon JM. Ranatuerins: antimicrobial peptides isolated from the skin of the American bullfrog Rana catesbeiana. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;250:589± 92. [47] Horikawa R, Parker DS, Herring PL, Pisano JJ. Pipinins: new mast cell degranulating peptides from Rana pipiens. Fed Proc 1985;44:695. [48] Simmaco M, Mignogna G, Barra D, Bossa F. Novel antimicrobial peptides from skin secretions of the European frog Rana esculenta. FEBS Lett 1993;324:159±61. [49] Simmaco M, Mignogna G, Barra D, Bossa F. Antimicrobial peptides from skin secretions of Rana esculenta. Molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding esculentins and brevinins and isolation of new active peptides. J Biol Chem 1994;269: 11956±61. [50] Mor A, Nicolas P. Isolation and structure of novel defensive peptides from frog skin. Eur J Biochem 1994;219:145±54. [51] Tyler MJ, Stone DJM, Bowie JH. A novel method for the release and collection of dermal, glandular secretions from the skin of frogs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1992;28:199±200. [52] Hancock REW, Lehrer R. Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol 1998;16:82±88. [53] Matsuzaki K, Mitani Y, Akada K-Y, Murase O, Yoneyama S, Zasloff M, Miyajima K. Mechanism of synergism between antimicrobial peptides magainin 2 and PGLa. Biochemistry 1998;37:15144±53. [54] Miele R, Ponti D, Boman HG, Barra D, Simmaco M. Molecular cloning of a bombinin gene from Bombina orientalis: detection of NF-(B and NF-IL-6 binding sites in its promoter. FEBS Lett 1998;431:23±38. [55] Simmaco M, Boman A, Mangoni ML, Mignogna G, Miele R, Barra D, Boman HG. Effect of glucocorticoids on the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides in amphibian skin. FEBS Lett 1997;416:273±5. [56] Barra D, Simmaco M, Boman HG. Gene-encoded peptide antibiotics and innate immunity. Do `animalcules' have defence budgets? FEBS Lett 1998;430:130±4.