EDITORIAL
Clinical nurse specialists nursing care concepts Recently
an
international
mainly
from Europe,
consider
‘the profile
at diff‘rrent sider
(and
Europe
to prepare
lurther
exploration
their
tics,
in
North
in the 1 nited of
parts
National Health
has been since
part)
first by the Joint
for and
in I !%I0comparatively
Royal
few nurses
the and
College
affect
many
sarily
take
physical
in critical a holistic
papers
in this journal
ognise
that
nursing
of the people
of the
mind-body
nursing tion
to time
and
care-planning
problems
leaving
ha\~
thts title.
So it is good with
anti promoting
to see international
a view
appropriate
of the reasons
nursing
to sharing
resources
education
for CNSs,
tual
more
education
as well
nursing routines
of treatment
in the specialty.
cedures
any
(>nr of‘ the issues raised nurses
should
address continue
sation.
especially
should
b(~ providing
~Auld
cited
incompatible anslyer from this iournal
along
when
in Casey with
by Margaret
at the meeting
the path
you consider holistic 1990).
holistic
care
Auld
in
was ‘whether ofspecialithat
nurses
to patients.’
So is specialisation nursing
care?
The
most of those who read or write in is likely to be a resounding ‘no’.
medical
considered nurse’. sensory tion,
thinking patients with
the
lif‘e-threatening
care
effectively
and plan-
nursing holistic
pracis that
at the concep-
practice
level.
training)
conditions
care
U’hilc
rmphasised
or injuries.
standard
and care and technical
other
considerations
secondary
and
just
pro-
tendrd ‘being
to hat a
nicts
As nurses lrarn about concepts such deprivation or overload, drprrsonalisasocial
complement base
nursing
for thinking
critical
(or
mainly
critical
is it so in rcla-
for thrse
is increasingly
education
consrqut~nt
be very import-
perspective,
as technical
which must necessarily be beyond the level of post-basic. courses which prepare nurses to work
her kc);notc
Arc and
no room
tice is becoming
spiritual
and
for short-term
appropriately
also take
and
not least because
may
time
also rec-
must
But while
with
to a short
One
of
in these respects
ning for the future?
c~ollaboration
concerned;
perspective?
concern
to
social
ill people.
is holistic
in relation in the variety
patients
which
bodies.
must neces-
care nurses
interactions
effects
essential
many
such
aspects
1975). But
to do so, though
critical
or Mayo
of their
perspective
as
patients
are affecting
care nursing
and
such
units,
parts
of psychological,
the rolr l’ull~-, as described in the RCN document I%& or <:hambrrs et al (1987), and few are prepared
ones
care. As is demonstrated
limited
have developed
which
or all different
working
a small (RCN,
suffer from conditions
ant in critically
by
provoke
care units,
specialist
or neurosurgical
in other
Midwifery
organised
sprrialisation
early
should
or critical
in more
cardiovascular
physiological
recently
Nursing,
intensive
extent
of Clin-
Board
in 1975 The
(RCN)
on clinical
more
to some
account
a variety the
/or the equivalent
UK I and
in
slower
For example
there
Boards
of Nursing
longer.
courses
\,‘isiting;
but
has been
clinical Studies
01 the
(CNS) in prac-
Canada,
it is an issue which
thought.
So a specialist
1990).
Kingdom
107Os,\,alidatrd ical Nu~sirlg
and
has taken
post-basic
co-
nurse specialists
of its value
and development
in
with a view to
well-developed
Amc*rira
recognition
Nevertheless In general
to con-
of international (Casey,
ofclinical
to
available
such specialists,
is not IWLV. It is already Europe
and
content)
of ways
nurses,
nurse specialist
levels’,
and collaboration
‘1‘1~ concrpt
of
Netherlands
of the clinical
post-registration
courses
opc.ration
group
met in The
and other critical
balance,
isolation knowledge
and
interdependrncy
of concepts
cardiovascular
failure.
as to
such as acidnutritional
deficits and negative nitrogen balance it becomes possible to take all these factors into considrration to the extent relr\rant in carr-planning.
58
INTENSIVE
But
CARE NURSING
concepts
moving
out
such of
example),
normalcy
movement
away
human
and
patients’
due to disease,
wholeness’
(Orem,
sometimes
forgotten
a
future
uncertain
and this must
attention
to these
may
could
at
a later
havre been
cessive
dependency.
pliance’
and
avoided;
many
opportunity
more.
to fulfil
‘normal’
for them
between
individuals)
them
problems
pressure
For some
their
(and
full
what
may
It could
to be
international
varies
credit
to those
after
the meeting
in giving their
sur-
\L’ell-prepared develop
CNSs
management
grounded
and
and dissrminatr
particular
situations,
families.
Nursing
knowledge
to defend
context
of such con-
where area,
professional
and justify provides
management in every
strong
nerds
of patients,
resources
for society,
non-nurses
positions.
No-one
but
CNS
any
leaders,
may
well
for the ser-
particularly be
in
in key
can be an expert should
in The
as developments
and
and thrsc
interdependent. open
How
involved
countries
and
devclop-
to a number
of’
opportunity
for
will we use it? All
in collaboration K&et-lands. proceed
at and It is to be
nurses
will be involved PAT
from too.
iZSHWOK?‘H
to
they can best be used kinds of clients or in
to the benefit
that
European
theory.
can help
and staff.
vices nursing a
in
research
crpts and the way in which in practice with particular
able
hoped
and
to the survival
come
with
contacts?
the full de-
ill patients;
recently
countries,
area in div-ided
as is the use of some of
mentioned
are to some extent
E:uropean
other
practice,
in Europr
has
specialist we stand,
said that
are
speaking
of CNS in practice
of critically
Freedom
excellence
to the survival
concepts
concepts
potential
be legitimately
of-nursing
the other
as exthr
and their in nursing
is as critical
development
viva].
thrir
theory
and
be such leaders,
of the concept
which
is ‘normal’ promotes
velopment ment
of
‘noncom-
be crucial
the ‘will to live’ which
we fall. )
is
patients
knowledge should
are
patients
such
sores,
So CNSs
(United
But early
problems
specialist
built.
in general
and discomfort
stage
which
particular.
patients
save
too, that is, have a sound broader in nursing as a firm foundation on
for nursing
recognised
be rccognised.
generalist background
or
normalcy
rehabilitation
(and staff j from the difficulties overcoming
for ‘a
or unsound
of
for some
concepts
for
of normal
or not sufficiently The
(on
area
desire
injury
goal
1985)) and
care.
anxiety care
the restriction
towards
in plannin
transfer
intensive
from
activity
relationship
as
the
be a good
References C:asrv S. 18-19.
1990 I‘hc spc&li\t drhatr. Nursinq Standard 41 FiI: April 25 ChambersJK ct al 1987 CIinical Nurw Specialist cc~llaboration: Dcvclopmcnt ofa gcncric job dcscriptiorr and standards ofp~rfbrmancc. (Iinical Sursc Sprcialist 1831:
Owm
I24
127
1) 198.5 Nursins+ ~~mc‘ep~\ ofpractiw. McGraw-Hill, NVWYork. (Third edition‘ p 184 Kq ;11(~ollcgc ofSursiq 1975 New Horizons in Clinical Nursing. Rrport ofa seminar a~ Lrrds Castle, Or~olwr 1975. Royal <:ollcgc ofNursing.London Royal C:ollrg~ of Nursing 1988 Sprcialtirs in nursing. Rrport of a working par,!, RI@ C:ollcyr of Nursing,London