1–3 (2002) 209–224]

1–3 (2002) 209–224]

Chemical Geology 363 (2014) 356 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemical Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemgeo Corrig...

93KB Sizes 4 Downloads 30 Views

Chemical Geology 363 (2014) 356

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Chemical Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemgeo

Corrigendum to “Multi-sample comparison of detrital age distributions” [Chem. Geol. 191/1–3 (2002) 209–224] Pieter Vermeesch⁎ Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

The author would like to inform the readers with the correction below to his published article. The observant reader may note a slight mismatch between Equation 13 and the plot coordinates of Figure 3a. This is because Equation 13 was calculated by classical MDS whereas Figure 3a was calculated by metric MDS. Equation 13 further implies that two-dimensional MDS configurations are given by the first two dimensions of any higher dimensional case. Although this is true for classical MDS, it is important to note that it is not necessarily the case for (non)metric MDS. Fortunately, neither the examples nor the computer code provided with the paper are affected by this inaccuracy.

DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.01.010. ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 7679 2418. E-mail address: [email protected]. 0009-2541/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.12.009