Corrigendum to “On the volume change in Co–Ni–Al during pseudoelasticity” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 2875–2881]

Corrigendum to “On the volume change in Co–Ni–Al during pseudoelasticity” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 2875–2881]

Materials Science and Engineering A 528 (2011) 4268 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Materials Science and Engineering A journal homepage: ...

95KB Sizes 0 Downloads 77 Views

Materials Science and Engineering A 528 (2011) 4268

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Materials Science and Engineering A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/msea

Corrigendum

Corrigendum to “On the volume change in Co–Ni–Al during pseudoelasticity” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 2875–2881] S. Dilibal a , H. Sehitoglu a,∗ , R.F. Hamilton a , H.J. Maier b , Y. Chumlyakov c a

University of Illinois, Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, 1206W. Green St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA University of Paderborn, Lehrstuhl f. Werkstoffkunde, D-33095 Paderborn, Germany c Siberian Physical Technical Institute, Revolution Sq.1, Tomsk, 634050, Russia b

The authors regret that there were two typographic errors in Table 1 of their paper. The value for ‘NiTiCu (cubic to monoclinic/orthorhombic) [12]’ should be ‘0.057’ instead of ‘−0.057’ as it was shown in the original table. Also, the word eigen strain is replaced by eigen value. Please see the corrected table below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Table 1 A summary of shape memory alloys showing the det U, and temperatures, critical stress (austenite) and maximum transformation strain obtained based on lattice parameters measurements. Experimental values, *, are shown when the theoretical values cannot be reached by experiment. Shape memory alloy

det U

Intermediate eigen value

Transformation shear

Temperature hysteresis (◦ C)

Critical stress (A) MPa

Md /Af Temperatures (◦ C)

Tension

Compression

NiTi (cubic to monoclinic) [10] NiTi (cubic to orthorhombic R) [11] NiTiCu (cubic to monoclinic/orthorhombic) [12] CuZnAl (Cubic to 18R) [5]

0.9965

0.9962

0.13

∼30

700–900 (C)

75 to 140/−10 **,#

0.105

−0.064

0.99705

1.0216

0.026

∼2





0.0017 to 0.0051

−0.0026 to −0.0052

1.0008 1.0128++

0.9895 0.9986++

0.1438 0.097++

∼10

500 (C)

100/50

0.0939, 0.057

−0.061, −0.0415

0.997 (exp.) 0.997



0.23

∼10



30/−25

0.09

−0.09

1.023

0.0958

∼30





0.062

−0.082

0.994

0.9354

0.1267

∼2

900 (T)

340/30

0.14

−0.062

1.0032

1.097

0.1823

∼200

850 (T)

475/10

0.03*

−0.015*

1.018

0.9614

0.0975

∼20

1000–1700 (C)

500/0 to 40#

0.06*

−0.033*

CuNiAl (cubic to orthorhombic) [5] FeNiGa (cubic to tetragonal) [14] FeNiCoTi (cubic to tetragonal) [15] CoNiAl (cubic to tetragonal) [1–4]

Maximum transformation strain

(*) denotes experimental values, (++) cubic to mono/orthorhombic twinless, (**) nickel-rich near equiatomic (composition dependent), (–) rhombohedral angle = 89.4◦ , (#) depends on the composition and heat treatment, (C) – compression, (T) – tension, (A) – Austenite.

DOI of original article:10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.056. ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 217 333 4112; fax: +1 217 244 6534. E-mail address: [email protected] (H. Sehitoglu). 0921-5093/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.001