Coupled phase diagrams and thermochemical data for transition metal binary systems-III

Coupled phase diagrams and thermochemical data for transition metal binary systems-III

CALPHAD Vo1.2, No.2, pp.117-146. 8 Pergamon Press Limited, 1978. Printed in Great Britain. COUPLEDPHASE DIAGRAMSAND THERMOCHEMICAL DATA FOR TRANSITIO...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 50 Views

CALPHAD Vo1.2, No.2, pp.117-146. 8 Pergamon Press Limited, 1978. Printed in Great Britain.

COUPLEDPHASE DIAGRAMSAND THERMOCHEMICAL DATA FOR TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS-III* Larry Kaufman ManLabs, Inc., 21 Erie Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

ABSTRACT.

A data base covering the transition metals has been developed which permits coupling of thermochemical and phase diagram data and can readily be employed to compute ternary and higher order systems. The current paper, which is part of a series, details the following twelve binary systems: titanium-manganese, chromium-manganese, iron-manganese, cobalt-manganese, manganese-nickel, copper-manganese, titanium-copper, cobalt-copper, copper-chromium, iron-copper, nickel-copper and niobium-copper. This brings the total of such systems covered to thirty-seven. This paper together with the past and projected contributions will cover other binary members in order to permit calculation of a sufficiently wide range of ternary systems. 1.

Introduction

Previous papers in the current series (l-3) provide descriptive information covering twenty-five binary systems composed of titanium, chromium, iron, cobalt, nickel, niobium, molybdenum and tungsten. The present paper includes binary systems containing manganese and copper thus enlarging the data base. Future contributions will extend this list to cover carbon, aluminum and silicon. Thus lattice stability descriptions of manganese and copper are presented below which when coupled with those presented earlier (l-3) and with excess free energy and compound formation data permit characterization of specific ternary systems. 2.

Lattice

Stability

Values

Tables 1 and 2 provide lattice stability values for manganese and copper as well as the elements discussed earlier with respect to the P(8Mn) and K(aMn) structures. The current series of binary systems display wide ranges of temperature and composition over which the P(8Mn) and K(oMn) structures are stable. As a consequence, it is necessary to treat these phases as solutions and to specify the lattice stability of the P and K structures for the binary partners of manganese. These lattice stabilities, which are shown in Tables 1 and 2 for copper, titanium, chromium, iron, cobalt and nickel were obtained by analyses of their respective binary systems and are the first such estimates developed for the metals in question. Accordingly, they will be treated as provisional values and will be modified in the future as required. Comparison of the numerical values shown in Tables 1 and 2 for the lattice stability of the P and K structures (as compared with the fee, bee or hcp forms) does not disclose any unusual behavior.

*

This work has been sponsored by the Metallurgy Program, Metallurgy and Materials Section, Division of Materials Research, National Science Foundation, Washington D.C. under Grant DMR76-08453.

117

L. Kaufman

118

TABLE

1

LATTICE STABILITY VALUES FOR THE ELEMENTS* (4) _=-=_=-=-=_=-=_=-=-=_ (Units of J/mol and J/m01 K will be used throughout)

(L=Liquid. P=Primative Cubic-8Mn, K=Complex Cubic-aMn)

Element

o&o&-=

Mn

cu

*

E-m

=

Temperature Range (K)

14644-9.6233

1220 < T

oGL_oGhcp =

9205-7.1131

1220 < T

.&_op

=

16401-10.8781

1220 < T

oGbcc_yp

=

3975-2.887T

1220 < T

OGP_$ =

2259-2.259T

1220 < T

oGfcc_oGbcc =

1477-0.51400T-2.7420(E-3)T2+1.6534(E-6)T3

400 < T < 1220

opt _OGP =

611+13.101T-2.1240(E-2)T2+0.8396(E-5)T3

400 < T < 1220

o&o&-

6778-6.2761

300 c T

oGbcc_oGfcc =

6276-3.347T

300 < T

o$cp_o(;bcc =

-5648+4.602T

300 < T

0CfCC_OCP =

-2218

300 < T

yP_yK

-3640+2.510T

300 < T

=

10srn

=

=

119

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

TABLE

2

LATTICE STABILITY VALUES FOR THE ELEMENTS*

(Units of J/m01 and J/m01 K will be used throughout)

Element

(P=PrimativeCubic-8Mn, K=Complex Cubic-aMn) .CfCC - OCP =

Ti

-4184

300 < T

=

2929

300 < T

0G-P =

-5439

300 < T

OCP _ OCK

OGfCC-

Cr

Fe

co

Ni

*

E-m

Temperature Range (K)

yp _ OGK =

4812 - 2.0921

300 < T

0CfCC - OCP =

-1151 - 0.837T

300 < T

OCP _ OCK

-418 + 0.167T

300 < T

.CfCC _ OCP =

-4443-9.045T+1.7218(E-2)T2-0.67509(E-5)T3

300 < T

OCP - OCK

-3347 + 1.841T

300 < T

0CfCC - OCP =

-2092

300 < T

OCP - OCK

-1464

300 < T

=

I,,-”

=

=

=

-6874

Ti0.333?0.667

(LavesPhase)

-3870

TiO.5oo”“o. 500

AH = H-x&~~~-x&~&

AS =

-xTix14,,1569

KC&l

Compound

0

-xTi~10042

P(BW

3.530

3.421

xTik9.205

0

-xTih2720

fee

0

0

0

+R[~i'~i+~~~I

ES+ = S&TioS;i-~oS~

xTik23012

0

-xTix14J2552

EH9 = H$Ti'H&4n"I$n

hcp

bee

Liquid

Phase 0

~LYTICAL DESCRIPTIONOF TEE TIT~I~-THESE

TABLE 3

x& = 0.333

qi = 0.500

Composition

O
o
06x&l

ki&l

0$x&l

O
Composition Range

SYSTEM

8 = hcp

8 = bee

Comments

400,
lOOO
1200.sT,<1500 ' Refers to fee

400,
800
1400cT~2000 'Refersto Liquid

Comments

z

=I H

k? I

F;:

!!

!j

E

g

4

E E ..

Cro.210Mno.790

1.862

1.388

-3332

-3316

xk

x&

= 0.790

= 0.667

Composition

AS = S-X&$,-X~~S~

O-'h-'l

' AH = H-x& OH' Cr_x* ~ oHMn

Cr0.333Mn0.667

Compound

+xCrb6.276

-xCrk3096

o
O-
-xCrxMn10.46

-xcrxMn17573

fee

O
Composition Range

-xCrk3096

-xCrxMn10.46

-xCrxMn8786

bee

-xCrxMn10.46

+R[xC,Q-lxCr+s~~n$J

ES@ = SO_"Cr~S$Mn%~

-xCrx&2552

EH$ = H$CroH$Mno$

Liquid

Phase 10

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CHROMIUM-MANGANESE SYSTEM

TABLE 4

e = bee

f3= bee

Comments

400
8006 T& 1500 o Refers to 8Mn

12006 T,<1500 o Refers to fee

400$T,< 2200 o Refers to bee

lSOO\
Comments

L. Kaufman

122

The Titanium-Manganese

3.

System

Table 3 shows the analytical description of the titanium-manganese system which can be coupled with the lattice stability values to compute the The former is shown in Figure 1 phase diagram and thermochemical properties. where it is compared with the observed diagram (5-8). The present analytical description supercedes an earlier version (9) which dealt with a limited porThe latter was used successfully to calculate the ternary tion of the system. system Ti-Mn-Mo in-good agreement with observations (9). The Chromium-Manganese

4.

System

Table 4 displays the analytical description of the chromium-manganesl system which can be employed to compute the phase diagram shown in Figure 2 fo. As in the forgoing titanium comparison with the observed phase diagram [S-8). thermochemical data could be located for commanganese case, no experimental parison with the values which can be computed on the basis of the analytical description shown in Table 4. 5.

The Iron-Manganese

System

The iron-manganese system is characterized by extensive solid solufee, bcc,.BMn(P) and.oMn(K) phases are stable. Prc tion ranges where the liquid, vious analyses (10,ll) have considered only limited composition ranges or deal. Experimental thermochemical with no more than three of the stable phases. data are available for the fee and liquid phases. Table 5 summarizes the experimental thermochemical data (8) provided by the compilation of Hultgren, et.al. The analytical description of the liquid, bee, fee, BMn(P) and oMn(K) phases of the iron-manganese system presented in Table 6 can be employed to calculate the thermochemical properties and the phase diagram which is compared with the observed phase diagram (5-8) in Figure 3. The computed ironmanganese phase diagram shown in Figure 3 is obtained by coupling the free energy of mixing equations specified in Table 6 with the lattice stability values for the liquid, bee, fcc,P and K forms of manganese and iron provided ir Tables 1 and 2 above and in the earlier referenced work (1,2). Recent experimental work by Hayes (12), who measured the vapor pressure of fee iron-manganese alloys at 1350K suggests that the minimum excess Gibbs energy of formation This value is more negative than either in this system is about -800 J/mol. the experimental thermochemical results listed in Table 5 or the values calculated from the analytical expressions given in Table 6. Both sets of result! suggest that the excess free energy of mixing of fee iron-manganese alloys at 1350K is positive with a maximum excess of free energy of mixing near 1000 J/mol. The difference between this result and the value suggested by Hayes (12) lies within the stated uncertainty limits shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 DATA FOR IRON-MANGANESE EXPERIMENTALTHERMOCHEMICAL ALLOYS (8)

0.1 00.: 0:4 ^ _ :::

EHfcc -___-1314 -3431 -2456

(145OK)______:___ -1.238 -3.167 -2.297

-4204 -4728?1674 -4925 -4690 -3895 -2389

-3.837 -4.255+0.837 -4.372 -4.113 -3.381 -2.054

EGL (13$3K) 703 924 1054 1100?1674 1054 924 703 397

L. Kaufman

123

124

L. Kaufman

xFex&-9665xFe-5021xJ

K(ati)

.~ . -.--___

xFex&-18870)

EH' = H$-xFeoH;e-x&&

fee

bee

Liquid

Phase 0

L

,*I

.___,_

._._

..

.I

.1..

-

.”

.-,

-_-u

-

-.I

__L, ,“,

400< T,<1200 'Refers to aMn


06X

xFek[-7.782xFe-2.510%]

-2.9204x10-3T]

800~T<1500 'Refers to 8Mn O,
xFexh[-11.326xFe-5.217%

300,
300&T< 2000 'Refers to bee

1500&T,< 2000 ORefers to Liquid

Comments

O,
O,
Composition Range

-xFeh16.987

-xFeh16.987

ES+ = S@_x FeoS~e-xMnos!& +R]xFe~nxFe+~an~]

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE IRON-MANGANESE SYSTEM

TABLE 6

126

L. Kaufman

a

127

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

6.

The Cobalt-Manganese System

Experimental thermochemical data for coablt-manganese alloys (8) is shown in Table 7. Table 8 provides an analytical description of the system which can be coupled with the lattice stability provided earlier to calculate the thermochemical properties as well as the phase diagram shown in Figure 4 for comparison with the observed phase diagram (5-8). TABLE

7

EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICAL DATA FOR COBALT-MANGANESE ALLOYS AT 1023K (8) xcoCofCC

+

xMnMnP-+ CoxcoMn~~~

(0.1
xcoCofcc

+

xMnMnP-+ CoxCoMnzMn

(0.64
P = 8Mn Structure

XMn

AG

AG

'Mn

0.10

-4904

0.20 0.30 0.40

AG

XMn

0.50

-11498

0.70

-10397

-7941

0.60

-11305

0.80

-8289

-9912 -11054+1464

0.63 0.64

-11125 -11054

0.90

-4979

Recent experimental measurement of the excess free energy of mixing of fee Co-Mn alloys by Hayes (12) suggests that the minimum excess free energy of formation of Co-Mn alloys at 1350 is -4500 J/mol. This compares with a value of -5577 J/mol derived from the analytical descriptions in Tables 1 and 8. The experimental values at 1023K shown in Table 7 yield a minimum excess free energy of formation of -5594 J/mol. 7.

The Manganese-Nickel System

Table 9 summarizes the experimental thermochemical data available for the manganese-nickel system (8). Table 10 displays the analytical description of the liquid, fee, bee, P, K and compound phases which can be coupled with the lattice stability values presented earlier to compute the phase diagram shown in Figure 5 and the thermochemical properties. The former is compared with the experimental phase diagram (5-8) in Figure 5. TABLE

9

EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICAL- DATA FOR MANGANESE-NICKEL ALLOYS AT 1050K (8) xMnMnP+ xNiNi

fee

NifCC

-+Mn 'Mn

XNi 0.21 0.30 0.40

AG -10669 -13765 -16339

AH -3573 -6791 -10711

XNi 0.42 0.57 0.60

(P = %Mn structure)

'Ni AG

-16786 -17820 -17602

AH -18318 -14489 -14393

XNi 0.70 0.80 0.90

AG -15882 -12050 -7527

AH -12966 -9272 -5418

128

L.

Kaufman

Figure

CO

-

c

4.

The

Calculated

Cobalt-Manganese

(a)

System.

1000

fee

1500

2000

2500

‘T°K

(b)

Observed

Liquid

(S-8)

bee

Mn

-

Compound

fee

Liquid

Phase Q

x$ si

-0.557 -2.040

-16777

"I%

+1.360

si

"ii

= 0.750

= 0.667

= 0.500

= 0.333

= 0.250

Composition

06xNi61

o*xNixl

-18891

+1.302

-17.730

e AS = S-x* OS8 Mn Mn-%iosNi

-xMnxNi17.991

-xMnxN.#3178xMn+39330xNi]

AH = H-x&'&-xii?-&

-xMnxNi17.991

-xMnxNi[63178xh+39330xNi]

O
e = fee

e = fee

8 = bee

8 = fee

8 = K(aMn)

Comments

400
7006T<1500 o Refers to @tn

300< Td1800 ' Refers to fee

1200
06Si61

-xMnxNi3.640

-.xMnXNi10.878

1200qT,<1800 o Refers to Liquid

Comments

OCxNi'l

Composition Range

.xMnxNi10.878

+R[xMnKnxMn+xNillnxNil

Es@ = s%MnOs~-xNi's~i

-xMnxNiW32xMn+64434xNi]

EHe = HI$xMnO&-xNioH&

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MANGANESE-NICKEL SYSTEM

TABLE 10

Figure

5.

The Manganese-Nickel

Liquid

System.

1000

1500

2000

2500

T”K

(b)

Observed

(5-8)

L. Kaufman

132

8. The Copper-ManganeseSystem Table 11 summarizes the experimental thermochemicaldata for the copper-manganesesystem (8). Table 12 shows the analytical description of the solution phases in this system which can be coupled with the lattice stability values to compute the thermochemicalproperties and the phase diagram which is compared in Figure 6 with the observed phase diagram (S-8). The starting point for the present analysis was the discussion presented in reference (4). TABLE 11 EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICALDATA FOR COPPER-MANGANESEALLOYS (8) xMn 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

EHfcc (1100K) 1004 1908 2544 2933 3197k418

EGfcc (UOOK) -118 -50 276 720tl464 1209

9.

EGL (1500K) -473 -267 +405 +1222 +1992*418

EHfcc EGfcc EGL (1100K) (11OOK) (1550K) +2632 0.6 3644 1669 +3020 0.7 4221 1987 +2958 0.8 4586 2004 -*-0.885 3012 1606 ------+513 0.9 'Mn

The Copper-TitaniumSystem

Table 13 summarizes the limited experimental thermochemicaldata currently available for the copper-titaniumsystem. The analytical description shown in Table 14 when coupled with the lattice stability values provided nreviouslv nermits calculation of the thermochemicalproperties as well as the-phase d&gram which is shown in Figure 7 where it is compared with the observed phase diagram (5-8). TABLE 13 EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICALDATA FOR COPPER-TITANIUM ALLOYS (8) xCuCuL + xTiTiL + 0.1 TiL xCu 'Ti 'Ti 0.86 0.93

(L = Liquid)

AG (1800K) -5891*167 -3924

xCuCufcc + xTiTibCC + CuxCuTi~~~

XTi 0.905 0.950

AG (1473K) -3234+105 -2092

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

8 w

r

133

134

L. Kaufman

0

0

-9310

-5055

AS = S-X~~~S~~-X*~~~S~~

-1.580

AH = H-x;~~H;~-x&~H;~

Compound

-9142

xTixCu [‘6O’I

fee 0

“&I

“&I

0.333

= 0.770

= 0.500

“&l =

Composition

o
OCXcu"l

0

hcp

O-
0

xTixCu [s’s’1

bee

Osxcu
Composition Range

0

+R[xTiLnxTi+xCulnxCu]

$ ES@ = S$_x .yj._x Ti Ti CuosC"

xTixCu[-17573XTi_11715xcu]

EH+ = HI$-xTiOl$i-xCuOH~u

Liquid

Phase 0

TABLE 14 ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TITANIUM-COPPER SYSTEM

8 = fee

e = fee

6 = bee

Comments

300
300xT<1400 "Refers to hcp

800
lOOO
Comments

136

L. Kaufman

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

10.

137

The Cobalt-Copper System

Table 15 shows the experimental thermochemical data presently available for cobalt-copper alloys (8). The analytical description shown in Table 16 when combined with the lattice stability values provided earlier permits calculation of the thermochemical properties and the phase diagram. The latter, shown in Figure 8, is compared with the observed phase diagram (5-8). TABLE

15

EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICAL DATA FOR COBALT-COPPER ALLOYS (8)

xcu

ECfcc

EHL

(1300K)

(14733) ___

0.050

1636

0.093

2778

0.947 0.950

1652*418 -_11.

1565+628

The Copper-Chromium System

Table 17 provides the analytical description of the copper-chromium system which can be employed to compute the thermochemical properties and the phase diagram. The latter which is compared in Figure 9 with the observed phase diagram (5-8) shows a miscibility gap in the liquid with a critical point at 1947K and 58% Cr. 12.

The Iron-Copper System

Table 18 displays the experimental thermochemical data presently available for the iron-copper system (8). Recently, Kubaschewski, Smith and Bailey (14) carried out an extensive analysis of this system. Their analytical description of the system is shawn in Table 19. Combination of the latter with the lattice stability values presented earlier permits calculation of the thermochemical properties and the phase diagram shown in Figure 10 (14). TABLE

18

EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICAL DATA FOR IRON-COPPER ALLOYS AT 1823K (8) xcu

EHL

0.1

3975

0.548

ESL

0.2

6535

0.757

0.3

8021

0.774

0.4

8757

0.728

0.5

8920?418

0.678kO.334

0.6

8506

0.590

0.7

7485

0.460

0.8

5803

0.305

0.9

3364

0.159

0

xcoxcu[29288xco+31798xcu]

fee

xcuxcr104600

~~u~~~104600

fee

-1.67912T+4.24914x10-4T2)]

+2.83276~10-~T~)+6778Ox~~]

bee

~~ux~~[16.736x~~+x~u(1613.6

xCuxCr]xCu(1032150-0.83956T2

Liquid

0

0

+R[xCu~nxCu+xCr~nxCrl

EsQ = &XCuOS~u-xcrOS~,

EH' = H$xCuoH;u-xCroH;,

Phase +

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE COPPER-CHROMIUM SYSTEM

TABLE 17

0

xcoxcu[29288xco+31798xcu]

xcoxcu[8.368xco+16.736xcu]

+R[xCo~nxCo+xCu~nxCul

$ ES@ = S _x + co"Sco-xcuoScu

bcp

= ~-xCoO~~o-xCuO~~u

xcoxcu[40166xco+53555xcu]

E$ H

Liquid

Phase * $

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE COBALT-COPPER SYSTEM

TABLE 16

Cr"

06 XCrGl

O
o
Composition Range

OQXCu\
o
O
Composition Range

400
lOOO
1300,
Comments

a Refers to fee 400cTc1800

o Refers to hcp 400*:T<8DO

o Refers to Liquid 1300~T61800

Comments

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

+

+

139

140

L. Kaufman

141

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

It is interesting to compare the analyses of the fee copper-iron (14) with those described in CALPHAD 1 phase presented by Kubaschewski et.al. Reference to Table 19 shows that 37-40,1977 by Hillert (15) and Brewer (16). th excess free energy of mixing of the fee phase of the iron-copper system, ECycc, can be described by Equation (1) as ECfcc

the

= xFexCu[(54124-13.4637T)xFe

The analysis performed following description shown ECfcc

= xFexCu[

Brewer’s ECfcc

+(42288-3.429T)xCU]

by Harvig, by Equation

Kirchner (2)

and Hillert

(41119-4.376T)xFe+(58290-14.47T)xCU]

result

(16)

is

given

by Equation

(J/mol) (15)

(1) yields

(J/mol)

(2)

(3)

= ~F~~C~[(37620-2.13T)~F~+(41800-2.13T)xC~]

(J/mol)

(3)

ECfcc by the three individual analyses Although the Equations for evaluation of the numerical coefficients of the xFe and xCu terms differ, within the braces at 1250K do not differ substantially, thus Equation (1) yields 37294 and 38001 respectively while Equation (2) yields 35647 and 40207 and Equation (3) yields 34953 and 39133. (1) - (3) should yield Thus, Equations nearly the same numerical values for the excess free energy of mixing of the fee iron-copper phase in the temperature range of interest. 13.

The Copper-Nickel

System

Table 20 summarizes the experimental thermochemical data for nickel-copper alloys (8). An analytical description for the liquid and fee phases in this system is given in Table 21. The latter can be combined with the lattice stability values provided earlier to compute the phase diagram shown in Figure 11 as well as the thermochemical properties. The calculated miscibility gap critical point at 615K and 32% Cu is in reasonable agreement with the critical point calculated at 595K and 20% Cu by Elford, Mueller and Kubaschewski (17). Figure 11 compares the calculated diagram with the observed phase diagram (5-8). 14.

The Niobium-Copper

System

Table 22 displays the analytical description of the niobium-copper system. Combining these results with the lattice stability values provided earlier, permits calculation of the thermochemical properties and the phase diagram which is compared in Figure 12 with the observed phase diagram (5-8).

h

02

QL Q6 0,8 Mole Fraction. NFe

Fe

Comparison of the calculated equilibrium diagram Mid lines) with experimental data for the binary F&u system. 0 Hansen phase diagram’) (bars in range 0.3 d NFs B 0.7 indicate k 15Kl Figure 10 (14) A Spaich at al.

j’=fCC=E , cr=bcc=d,

LIQ=Liquid

~~~~~_[36134x~~+32508xC,

Liquid

fee

xFe+j8070xCu

xFexCu[54124xFe+42288xCU]

-0.21597T2+1.74832x10-4T3

-xFex&33930

+7565(xFe-xCu)2+2418(xFe-xCJ3]

EH+ = Hkx M FeoH!e-XCuoHk

Phase +

bee

19

xFexCu[13.4637xFe+3.4292xCU]

+2.62248~10-~T~-0.5326xlO-~T~]

-xFexCu[217.482xFe+238.754xC,-0.43194T

(~~~-x~J~+2.34777(x~~-x~~)~]

xFexCu[3.50012xFe+0.21758xCu+2.58626times

+RtxFeanxFe+xCuLnxCul

Es+ = S~-xFeOS;e-XC"OS~u

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE IRON-COPPER SYSTEM (14)

TABLE

cu

41

o\
06X

O&XCu"l

Composition Range

400~ T\<1800 o Refers to fee

1041\
1300s T,<1900 o Refers to Liquid

Comments

E

TABLE

22

&lx ] +R[xNi&nx Ni+XCu Cu

0 ES@ = S@ _x .o,$ Ni NimXCuoSCu

EHe = ~-xNbo~b-xC~ 00 NC_

XNbXCul11294

xNbxCu46024

98742 xNbxCu

Liquid

bee

fee

41.84 'NbXCu

0

xNbxCu41.84

+R[x knx ] NbanxNb+XCu Cu

Es4= s+-xNb%~b-xcuos~u

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE NIOBIUM-COPPER SYSTEM

xNixcu[11632xNi+2469xcu]

+' EH@ = H+-x .'H@__x M Ni Ni Cu'HCu

Phase Ip

fCC

Liquid

Phase QI

21

ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE NICKEL-COPPER SYSTEM

TABLE

xcu’<

1

1

0$X

cu

$1

OQXCu"c1

OSXCu
Composition Range

0-S xcu’<

04

Composition Range

300dT,<1400 'Refers to fee

3004 T,<2800 "Refers to bee

1200,
Comments

300,
1200~ Tc1800 'Refers to Liquid

Comments

E

144

L. Kaufman

145

TRANSITION METAL BINARY SYSTEMS - III

,

I

146

L. Kaufman

TABLE

20

EXPERIMENTAL THERMOCHEMICAL DATA FOR NICKEL-COPPER ALLOYS (a)

xCU

EHfcc

ESfcc (973K)

EGL (18233)

0.1

971

-0.602

1092

0.2

1582

-0.962

1941

0.3

la79

-1.125

2548

0.4

1929

-1.146

2912

0.5

177ak418

-1.067+0.460

3033*418

0.6

1485

-0.925

2900

0.7

1109

-0.749

2494

0.8

694

-0.519

1820

0.9

310

-0.272

958

(L=Liquid)

References 1.

L. Kaufman, CALPHAD L

2.

L. Kaufman and H. Nesor, CALPHAD 2, 59 (1978).

7 (1977).

3.

L. Kaufman and H. Nesor, CALPHAD 2, 81 (1978).

4.

L. Kaufman and H. Bernstein, Computer Calculation of Phase Diagrams Academy Press, New York (1970).

5.

M. Hansen and K. Anderko, Constitution of Binary Alloys, McGraw Hill, New York, (1958).

6.

R. P. Elliott and F. Shunk, First and Second Supplements (Ibid) (1965), (1969).

7.

D. T. Hawkins and R. Hultgren, Metals Handbook S 251 American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio (1973).

a.

R. Hultgren, P. D. Desai, D. T. Hawkins, M. Gleiser and K. K. Kelly, Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Metals (and of Binary Alloys) (2 Volumes) ASM, Metals Park, Ohio (1973).

9.

L. Kaufman and H. Nesor, Annual Review of Materials Science, R. A. Huggin R. H. Bube and R. W. Roberts, Editors 3, (1973). Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, California.

10.

J. F. Breedis and L. Kaufman, Met. Trans. 2. 2359 (1971).

11.

G. Kirchner, T. Nishazawa and B. Uhrenius, Met. Trans. 4, 167 (1973).

12.

F. H. Hayes, CALPHAD 1, 295 (1977).

13.

J. M. Vitek and H. Warlimont, Metal Science (1976)pp7-13

14.

0. Kubaschewski, J. F. Smith and D. M. Bailey, Zeit. f. Metallkunde -68 495 (1977).

15.

H. Harvig, G. Kirchner and M. Hillert, Met. Trans. 2 329 (1972).

16.

L. Brewer, CALPHAD 1, 39 (1977).

17.

L. Elford, F. Mueller and 0. Kubaschewski, Ber Bunsenger Physik Chem., -73 601 (1969).