8lOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCHCOMMUNlCATlONS Pages 445-454
Vol. 138, No. 1, 1986 July 16, 1986
CSF-1
STIMULATES
John
A.
GLUCOSE
Royal
of
Melbourne
Received
Gino
Hamilton,
University
May 20,
UPTAKE IN MURINE MACROPHAGES Vairo
Melbourne,
Hospital,
and
BONE
Suzanne
R.
Department
Parkville,
MARROW-DERIVED
of
Lingelbach
Medicine,
Victoria,
3050,
Australia
1986
3H-2-deoxyglucose was used as an isotopic tracer for the measurement of glucose uptake into quiescent murine bone marrow derived macrophages. A pugified colony stimulating factor (CSF1) was shown to stimulate H-P-deoxyglucose uptake in a dosedependent manner. This stimulation was rapid, with a maximal effect seen at 20-30 minutes after growth factor addition. Both the inhibition by cytochalasin B and also the relative degree of competition by high concentrations of a series of glucose analogues suggest that the basal and CSF-1 stimulated 2deoxyglucose uptake occur via a carrier facilitated D-glucose transport system. The data indicate that a purified growth factor can increase the glucose uptake in macrophages, a finding which could be relevant to the survival and/or the proliferative response of this and other haemopoietic cell types. 0 1986 Academic Press, Inc. Colony is
stimulating
specific
for
macrophage) cell Mr
cells
lineage
specific
binding
(5).
require
a growth
proliferation
can
be
a two
Murine
prepared
as
these
adherent
Cel 1 s along
the
macrophage
and
such
as
differentiation
ABBREVIATIONS: BMM, bone specitic colony stimulating 2-DOG, 2-deoxy-D-glucose, haemopoietic cell growth
from
cells bone
L-
70,000
binding
to
marrow-derived
cells
homogenous expressing
lineage, for
mouse of
via
a relatively
CSF-1,
which
(or
glycoprotein
on the
(4).
factor
isolated
subunit
>, 95% of
factor,
a growth phagocytic
factor,
effects
r eceptors
(BMM) with
This
its
is
mononuclear
is
mediates
surface
population
the
medium,
which
macrophages
of
(CSF-1)
(1,2).
conditioned (3),
factor
their
cell
CSF-1
including
BMM,
survival,
(5).
marrow-derived macrophages; CSF-1, macrophagefactor (or macrophage growth factor); FBS, fetal bovine serum; HCGF, factor; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
445
All
Copyright 0 1986 rights of reproducriorl
0006-291X/86 $1.50 by Academic Press, Inc. !n any ,/Lwm reserved,
Vol. 138, No. 1, 1986 The
BIOCHEMICALAND
biochemical
differentiation (6)
are
events for
interaction
associated
cells
essentially
along
CSF-1
with
BMM as
events.
Several
studies
that
enhanced
glucose
transport
the
proliferative
cell
response
references
line
survival
and
(HCGF)
(9).
action
on
whether
has
These
normal
stimulates
uptake
uptake
in
study
demonstrated
cellular
change (see,
for
which
for
depends cell
It
in
by to
the
that
same
its
2-
be
CSF-1
BMM in
factor
involve
measured
here
quiescent
to
remains
behave
its
growth
appear
of
in
precursor
as
We report
the
a haemopoietic
(10,ll).
factors.
for
have
a haemopoietic
cells
lineages the
stimuli
transport
haemopoietic
glucose
early
effects
glucose
growth
an
established
HCGF-mediated
increasing
system
mitogenic
on
(2-DOG)
other
been
studying
cells
Recently,
proliferation
deoxyglucose
and
7,8).
(FDC-P2)
is to
been
other
and
haemopoietic
a model
in
proliferation
various
We have
such
example,
with
the
unknown.
of
BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
determined
way
to
HCGF
rapidly
a dose-dependent
manner.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Preparation
of
BMM were CBA or
marrow-derived
obtained
from
C3H/HeJ
previously prior
bone
mice
(5,12).
are
in allowed
differentiation 12-well
homogenous
population
(5).
in
medium
develop
dishes.
The
with
prior
growth
medium
marrow
as
described
proliferation BMM in
BMM are the
use
without
Linbro
446
conditioned
(Flow
Labs,
a relatively adherent
uptake
L-cell
a
and
of
for
from
after
L-cell
"starved" to
bone
cells,
containing
>/ 95% of
generally
18 hours
precursor
by
adherent
in
Parkville)
frozen
the
BMM were
approximately reculturing
to
cells
Institute,
growth
into
Australia)
CSF-1
precursor
Briefly,
incubation
medium,
(Hall
macrophages
pure cells
growth studies conditioned
and
binding
factor
for by medium.
Vol.
138,
Such
No.
1, 1988
BIOCHEMICAL
factor-deprived
GO/G1
state
cells
of
typically
the
gave
measured
by
2-OOG
cell
have cycle
nuclei
performed
KCl,
0.8mM
4 x
counting
in
Amersham,
to
be
COMMUNICATIONS
in
a quiescent
unpublished).
10
The
5 adherent
cells
protocol
per
well,
(15).
a HEPES 1.8mM
were
initiated
Australia,
cultures
were
washing
NaOH.
cells
was
was
measured
from
Pierce
Sources
(DMEM)
Chemical
the
(30-60
Ci/mmole, of
cells
method
in
0.5ml
of
1 ml
of
solubilized
Cellular
using
Illinois,
stopped
buffer
solubilized
counting.
lml
the
was
HEPES
in
Lowry
Company,
Uptake
Uptake
warm
5mM
the
protein
BCA reagent
U.S.A.
CSF-1 : Serum
was
prepared
containing
300
as
Mouse
ml
Dulbecco's
supplemented
with
fetal
L-cell
principally
alterations.
-inactivated roller
with
BMM
NaCl,
pH 7.4).
bath.
scintillation
by a modified
following in
water
and
135mM
3H-2-DOG
radioactivity by
BMM cultures
grown
HEPES,
quiescent
Incubations
4 times
D-glucose
into
2-DOG,
adding
shaking
monolayers
measured
BMM growth
20mM
by
Incorporated
of
(O.lmM
CaC12,
a 37°C
5.5mM
0.2M
buffer
uptake
1 u Ci/culture).
in
the
containing
For
shown
(3H-2-DOG)
MgC12,
measurements
the
been
RESEARCH
uptake
was
For
BIOPHYSICAL
(13,14
approximately
3H-2-deoxy-D-glucose
by
AND
bovine
described
L-cells
modified O.lg/l
minimum
(FBS)
but
essential
850
for
with
strain)
sulfate, in
medium (16)
(L-929
neomycin
serum
conditioned
were medium
10% heat
cm2
Corning
plastic
bottles. uptake
measurements
conditioned Briefly
(17). free
L-cell
absorption Ultrogel
medium
was
the
AcA-44
derived
purified
to
purification
conditioned (stage
: CSF-1
2),
medium
(stage
(stage 447
serum-free
homogeneity
stages
DEAE-sepharose
chromatgraphy
from
were: l),
as
L-cell
described
concentrated
serum
calcium
phosphate
chromatography
(Stage
4),
HPLC
size
exclusion
gel 3),
Vol. 138, No. 1, 1986
8lOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALFiESEARCHCOMMUNlCATlONS
chromatography (Stage
6)
CSF-1
(Stage and
HPLC
reverse
rechromatography
bioactivity
semi-solid
5),
was
agar
on
measured
medium
phase
reverse
using
according
phase
C57BL
to
chromatography
ref.
HPLC
bone
(Stage
marrow
7).
cells
in
6.
REAGENTS The (Flow
following
laboratories,
Company,
D-xylose
other
precautions
St.
and
Louis,
reagents for
were
Hospital
Products)
and
lysate
tests
D-glucose
analytical
made
up
endotoxin
All
pyrogen-free
levels
practical were
routinely
Serum
taken.
water
were
(Commonwealth
6-
Australia).
contamination in
FBS
Chemical
(Ajax,
grade.
endotoxin
:
3-0-methylglucose, B (Sigma
and
of
routinely
commercially
cytochalasin
minimizing
were
limulus
obtained L-glucose,
Missouri)
Solutions
by
were
Australia),
deoxyglucose,
All
reagents
(Abbott monitored
Laboratories).
RESULTS For was
linear
BMM in for
the at
absence least
30
of
CSF-1
minutes
the
uptake
(Fig.
1).
of
2-DOG
Incubation
(0.1 of
mM) BMM
; 4,0% 7430. % e 5 2.0. iE=
1.0.
O0
Figure
I.
Glucose
uptake
in
5
untreated
IO Time
15 20 (min.)
25
30
BMM
Quiescent BMM from CBA yice were washed twice with HEPES buffer and then pulsed with H-2-DOG for varying intervals. The zero time point was determined by pretreating the cells with phloretin (0.3mM) and immediately harvesting. This background value was subtracted from all of the experimental points. Each point represents the mean of triplicate cultures (t S.E.M.). 448
Vol.
138.
No.
1. 1986
0.4 1L
BIOCHEMICALAND
0
8lOPHYSlCALRESEARCHCOMMUNlCATlONS
10
loo [CSF-11
Figure
2.
Effect
of
both
point
2-DOG
Comparison
of
uptake
the
increase
2-DOG
uptake,
and
the
presented
the
by
Figure uptake
by
partially pulsed
was
Fig.
2 was
and
BMM
curves of
the due
the
partially the
carried
two
out
that (LPS) 3 shows
CSF-1.
3 minutes
the
contamination the (For
the
CSF-1 at
in
time
course
varying
there
was
CSF-1
of
was
The
449
active
the
strain,
uptake
was
to
experiment
BMM from
C3H/HeJ
was
not
caused
samples. stimulation
experiments used.)
intervals
preparations
L-cell
the
remaining sample
that
purified
2-DOG
CSF-1 2).
CSF-1
with
7)
(Fig.
mouse
increased
(stage
purified
CSF-1.
(fS.E.M.).
manner showed
that
to
cultures
pure
a dose-dependent
(LPS)-hyporesponsive
purified for
in
triplicate
2)
indicating
medium
suggesting
endotoxin
(stage
ability
in
lipopolysaccharide
(181,
uptake
mean of
response
activity
in
the
in
dose in
conditioned
glucose
purified
difference
that
on
represents
partially
stimulated
little
dose
(U/ml)
Quiescent BMM from C3H/HeJ mice were treated with various of partially purified (stage 2) CSF-1 (x---x) or pure 7) CSF-1 (0 -0) for 1 hour in HEPES buffer and then with 3H-2-OOG for 10 minutes (Materials and Methods). dilutions were made in HEPES buffer containing 15% FBS, to a final FBS concentration in the cultures of 1.5%.
doses (stage pulsed CSF-1 leading Each
with
CSF-1
4 ~#ooo
1,~
of
the
2-006
presented, Quiescent
after
addition
the
BMM were of
the
Vol. 138, No. 1, 1986
BIOCHEMICALAND
0
5
10
BIOPHYSICAL
15
30 Time
Figure
Kinetics
3.
of
RESEARCH
stimulation
of
COMMUNICATIONS
45
120
(min)
BMM
glucose
uptake
by
CSF-1
Quiescent BMM from CBA mice were washed twice buffer and pulsed in the same buffer for 3 minutes at varying intervals after the addition of partially CSF-1 (stage 2, 1000 U/ml). (O-O), + CSF-1; (O-B), Each point represents the mean of triplicate cultures
CSF-1
sample.
DOG uptake sharply
the
within to
which
There
the
plateau and
gradual
increase over
the
120
under
experiment
presented
which strain
yet
Difco
Labs.,
again
suggesting
samples
was
in the
2-DOG
Fig.
did
to so when
that due
to
B (1 LPS, LPS
(100
was
tested
the
increased
endotoxin
not
by
2-
at
experiments, within
resulted
a new
20 in
steady
state
enhancement
exceeded
of
3-fold.
with
a
2-
The
BMM from
the
a polypeptide block
rig/ml, itself 2-DOG
contamination. 450
to
of rising
reached
out
ug/ml),
rate
minutes,
other
maximal
carried
did
the
medium
never
3 was
Polymyxin binds
The
conditions
120
was
uptake
gEPE5 H-Z-DOG purified no CSF-1. f 5.E.M.
addition,
In
glucose
period.
in
Detroit)
not
low
basal
minute
until
cultures
the
in
factor
terminated.
treated
optimal
strain.
antibiotic this
CSF-1
in
growth
30 minutes was
incubation
DOG uptake
CBA mouse
within
the
increase
after
experiment
in
minutes
a significant
5 minutes
a plateau
time
level
was
with with
the E. (data uptake
CSF-1 coli, not in
effect Olll:B4, shown),
the
CSF-1
in
Vol.
138,
BlOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCH
No. 1, 1986
COMMUNICATIONS
I Figure
4.
Specificity treated
of
the
glucose
uptake
system
in
untreated
and
CSF-~
BMM
Same experiment protocol as for figure 2 except that partially purified CSF-I (stage 2, 1000 U/ml) was used and the compe ing drugs were added 15 minutes before the 10 minute pulse with 5H-2-DOG. BMM were from CBA mice. Cytochalasin B (Cyt) was at a final concentration of 50 PM while the following sugars were at 10mM: 2-DOG, D-glucose (D-Glu),L-glucose (L-Glu), 6-deoxy-Dglucose ('6-DOG), 3-D-methylglucose (3-D-MeG), and D-xylose (DEach point represents the mean of triplicate cultures XYl). (+S.E.M.)
2-DOG
can
it
is
is
non-utlilizable
can
be
transported
be
by
this
a
this
molecule
is
effect
inhibited
on the
Similar
basal
inhibition
inhibitor
of
facilitated not
the
by
rather
(data
which
CSF-1
was glucose
In
Fig.
inhibit
itself
by (data
2-DOG 4,
is it
451
have
uptake
found
uptake
(Fig.
by
4).
(0.3mM),
shown).
competed
for seen
and
completely
phloretin
be
found
(20).
glucose
not
can
we
unstimulated
macrophages
(21), 2-DOG
reason,
not
Others
to
caused
this
it it
However, in
by
known
transport of
used.
poorly
induced
also
is
shown).
carrier
and
For
poorly
not
is
glucose
transport L-glucose.
up
while
material,
which often
transported
B,
cellular
analogue
because
However,
kinases.
is
BMMs
Cytochalasin its
cytoplasmic
taken
transport
(19). into
glucose
is
glucose
carrier
intracellularly, analogue
of
glucose
by
CSF-l-stimulated
that
measure
incorporation
phosphorylated
phosphorylated
a
the
glucose,
that
as
by
3-O-methyl
in
used
Also, by that
another carrier-
D-glucose both
but the
basal
Vol. 138, No. 1, 1986
and
CSF-1
BIOCHEMICALAND
induced
concentrations
3H-2-DOG of
2-DOG
O-methyl-D-glucose, shown
to
system
have
the
are
some and
2-DOG
consistent
being
incorporation and
D-glucose,
specificity
but
effective
uptake
in
with
through
basal
by
D-glucose
varying
degrees The
4).
and
high
L-glucose. have
3also
been
transport in
competing
findings
CSF-l-enhanced
carrier-facilitated
by
D-xylose
the
BMM (Fig.
the
the
to
lowered
not
and with
are
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
was
6-deoxy-D-glucose
(22)
with
BIOPHYSICAL
in
Fig.
2-DOG
D-glucose
4
uptake
transport
as
system.
DISCUSSION We have basal
and
provided
stereospecific
stimulated
by
have
stimulated
to
transport
energy
of
dependent action
of
transport
that as
indicate
growth
an
particular
factor
survival
the
continual
be that
for
and,
an
BMMs in
presence all
2-DOG
cells
addition, of along
the
through
available
to
that
the
in
on
for
and
cell
on
glucose factor
proliferation
monocyte-macrophage 452
lines
is
from
the
glucose
results
progenitor
meet
HCGF-dependent
type
a growth
a
process
resulting
Our cell
cells
glucose
(9-11)
uptake.
diffusion
with
that
factor
BMMs CSF-1
made
metabolism
increase
depend
have
precursor
hemopoietic
cause
As mentioned, for
by
a normal can
is
of
attendant
energy
The
peritoneal
quiescent
uptake
shown
is
a facilitated
that
glucose
growth
measured
of
their
has
in
and and
haematopoietic
increase
for
those
more
of
that
a
manner.
alveolar
recognised
evidence
a number on
of
requirements
Recently
system
previously
increase
so that
additional
survival
well
BMM possess
a dose-dependent
with
is
growth
system
(7,8,19).
to
It
in
that
transport
described
consistent
(15,20).
suggests
systems
been
characteristics
the
CSF-1
transport
macrophages
which glucose
rapidly
monosaccharide
system
data
are
that
the
first
a purified
uptake. such
as
cells (5).
CSF-1 require
It
lineage,
could CSF-
BlOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCHCOMMUNlCATlONS
Vol. 138, No. 1, 1986 1 mediates
its
Further to
survival
experiments
determine
mitogenic could
are
the
the
dependent
of
same
on
in
relevance
effect be
effect
different
to
other
of
By
BMM.
glucose
answer
otherwise
on
the
enhanced
progress or
CSF-1
for
on
this our
question to
the
factors
by
grants
from
of
Australia,
the
situation
lineages
growth
and
findings
implication
hemopoietic
specific
uptake.
which
(CSFs)
are
(6).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This and
work
Medical
Council
of
was
Research Victoria,
supported Council the
Utah
Ramaciotti
Foundations
D.
and
A.
Burgess
Mrs
L.
Williamson
Metcalf
Shanks
and
and
are
the
Foundation,
the
the
Jack
Brockhoff
thanked
for
for
typing
the
the
Health
Anti-Cancer Clive
and
Foundation. CSF-1
of
National
bioassays,
Vera Drs. Ms.
manuscript.
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.
274: 168Stanley, E.R., Chen, D-M, Lin, H-S. (1978) Nature 170. Stanley, E.R., Guilbert, L.J. (1981) J. Immunol. Methods 42:253-284. Stanley, E.R., Heard, P.M. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252: 43054312. Morgan, C.J., Stanley, E.R. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 119:35-41. Tushinski, R.J., Oliver, I.T., Guilbert, L.J., Tynan, P.W., Warner, J.R., Stanley, E.R. (1982) Cell. 28:71-81. Metcalf, D. (1984) The hemopoietic colony stimulating factors. Elsevier. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford. Bose, S.K., Zlotnick, B.J. (1973) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70~2374-2378. Dubrow, R., Pardee, A.B., Pollack, R. (1978) J. Cell. Physiol. 95:203-212. Bazill, G.W., Haynes, M., Garland, J., Dexter, T.M. (1983) Biochem. J. 210:747-759. Whetton, A.D., Bazill, G.W., Dexter, T.M. (1984) EMBO J. 3:409-413. Dexter, T.M., Whetton, A.D., Bazill, G.W. (1984) Differentiation 27:163-167. Vairo, G., Hamilton, J.A. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 132:430-437. Pluznick, D.H., Cunningham, R.E., Naguchi, P.D. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:7451-7455. Tushinski, R.J., Stanley, E.R. (1985) J. Cell. Physiol. 122:221-228. 453
K.
Vol.
138,
No.
15. 16.
Norton, Hume,
17.
Burgess, Vairo, Chem. Guilbert,
1, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL
J.M., Munck, D.A., Gordon,
AND
A. (1980) S. (1983)
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
J. Immunol. 125:252-258. J. Cell. Physiol. 117:189-
194.
18.
A.W., Metcalf, D., Kozka, I.J., Simpson, G., Hamilton, J.A., Nice, E.C. (1985) J. 260.:16004-16011. L.J., Stanley, E.R. (1984) J. Immunol.
R.J., Biol. Methods.
73: 17-28. 19. Wohlhueter, R.M., Plagemann, P.G.W. (1980) Int. Rev. Cytol. 64: 171-240. 20. Mukkada, A.J., Bonventre, P.F. (1975) J. Reticuloendothel. sot. 17:20-29. D.W., Weber, M.J. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 254:355421. Salter, 3561. A.H., Connell, N.D. (1982) J. Cell Physiol. 111:7722. Romano, 82.
454