Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1 – 12 www.elsevier.com/locate/ejphar
Review
Cytokines and anti-cytokines as therapeutics — An update Vandana Tayal ⁎, Bhupinder Singh Kalra Department of Pharmacology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, 110002, India Received 15 May 2007; received in revised form 12 October 2007; accepted 18 October 2007 Available online 25 October 2007
Abstract Cytokines which comprise of a family of proteins — interleukins, lymphokines, monokines, interferons, and chemokines, are important components of the immune system. They act in concert with specific cytokine inhibitors and soluble cytokine receptors to regulate the human immune response. Their physiologic role in inflammation and pathologic role in systemic inflammatory states are now well recognized. An imbalance in cytokine production or cytokine receptor expression and/or dysregulation of a cytokine process contributes to various pathological disorders. Research is progressing rapidly in the area of cytokines and their therapeutic targets, the two major therapeutic modalities being the administration of purified recombinant cytokines and the use of their antagonists in various inflammatory disorders. However, given the large number of cytokines, it is disappointing that only relatively few can be used clinically. In the present article, we have made an attempt to review and present a glimpse of the history as well as up to date information that is pertinent to cytokines and anti-cytokine therapies in the treatment of cancer, autoimmune disorders and various other related diseases. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Interferons; Interleukins; Tumor necrosis factor
Contents 1. 2. 3. 4.
5.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties of cytokines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cytokines as therapeutic agents . . . . . . . . . . 4.1. Interferons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2. Interferon-alpha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.1. IFN-α-2a and IFN-α-2b . . . . . . 4.2.2. Peginterferon-alpha . . . . . . . . . 4.2.3. IFN-α con-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.4. Interferon-α-n3 . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3. Adverse effects of interferon-alpha . . . . . 4.4. Interferon-beta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.1. Interferon-β-1a and interferon-β-1b 4.5. Interferon-gamma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5.1. Interferon-gamma-1b . . . . . . . . 4.6. Interleukin-2 (IL-2, aldesleukin) . . . . . . . Anti-cytokines as therapeutic agents . . . . . . . . 5.1. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors . . . 5.1.1. Indications . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
⁎ Corresponding author. B-21, Tarang Apartments, 19-I.P Extension, New Delhi, 110092, India. Tel.: +91 11 9899027018. E-mail address:
[email protected] (V. Tayal). 0014-2999/$ - see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.10.049
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8
2
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
5.2.
Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist . 5.2.1. Anakinra . . . . . . . . 5.3. IL-2 receptor antagonists . . . . . 6. Chemokines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Other cytokines of possible importance . 8. Future perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
1. Introduction Cytokine is a word that comes from cyto meaning “cell” and kinin meaning ‘hormones’. Cytokines are soluble hormone-like proteins that allow for communication between cells and the external environment. It is an umbrella term which encompasses lymphokines, monokines, interleukins, colony stimulating factors (CSFs), interferons (IFNs), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and chemokines (Leonard, 1999). Cytokines are secreted by white blood cells as well as variety of other cells (fibroblasts, endothelial cells, epithelial cells, etc.) in the body in response to inducing stimuli, and are not constitutively expressed. It was in fact based on the realization that cells other than those of the immune system also secrete biologically active substances, that the concept of cytokines was proposed. It was Stanley Cohen in 1974 who for the first time introduced the term ‘‘cytokine’’ (Cohen et al., 1974, 2004). Cytokines serve many functions in the body such as mediating and regulating immunity, inflammation and hematopoiesis, but the largest group of cytokines is involved in immune cell proliferation and differentiation (Table 1). Although cytokines are produced by many cell populations, the predominant producers are helper T-cells (Th) and macrophages. 2. History The research in the field of cytokines began as early as in the 1950s with the identification of some of the factors like ‘endogenous pyrogen’ [now also known as interleukin-1 (IL-1)] (Bennett and Beeson, 1953), nerve growth factor (LeviMontalcini and Hamburger, 1953) and interferon (Isaacs and Lindenmann, 1957). In 1957, Alick Isaacs and Jean Lindenmann identified interferon-α as a factor produced upon stimulation of cells by viruses and which had the ability to protect cells from infection with viruses of any kind. In fact, the name ‘interferon’ comes from the ability to interfere with the production of new virus particles. They noted that it made cells resistant to viral infection but exerted no adverse effects on uninfected cells. This observation inspired hopes that IFN could be used to treat viral infections (Isaacs and Lindenmann, 1957). In 1966, John David and Barry Bloom independently identified ‘migration inhibiting factor’. This factor was found to be released from antigen activated lymphocytes and caused inhibition of the movement of macrophages in vitro (David, 1966; Bloom and Bennett, 1966). Subsequently, immunologists discovered that lymphocytes produce soluble mediators that
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . .
8 9 9 9 10 10 10 10
affect many functions of the immune system. These soluble mediators were collectively termed as ‘lymphokines’ by a scientist ‘Dudley Dumonde’ in 1969 (Dumonde et al., 1969). Similarly, active mediators derived from macrophages and monocytes in culture came to be known as ‘monokines’. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF), another important factor, was described originally in the 1970s as a mediator of lipopolysaccharide-induced necrosis of transplantable tumors. It was first isolated from the serum of mice treated with bacterial endotoxin, and was shown to replicate the ability of endotoxin to induce haemorrhagic necrosis of sarcomas (Carswell et al., 1975). TNF comprises of a family which primarily includes TNF-α, TNF-β, Fas ligand, TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), nerve growth factor, and CD40 ligand (Ksontini et al., 1998). In the 1980s, colony stimulating factors (CSFs), discovered by Donald Metcalf and colleagues, were found to stimulate growth and differentiation of various elements of bone marrow and were named according to the specific elements they support, like Granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), Granulocyte monocyte CSF (GM-CSF) and Erythropoietin. In the late 1980s scientists isolated the signaling molecules chemokines, which allowed leukocytes to communicate with one another and seek out and destroy invading pathogens. Anti-cytokine therapy was pioneered by Simon Skurkovich who detected interferon in the circulation of patients with autoimmune diseases and proposed that neutralization of IFN could be therapeutic (Skurkovich et al., 1974; Skurkovich and Eremkina, 1975; Skurkovich and Skurkovich, 1989). Another milestone of anti-cytokine therapy was the demonstration by Bruce Beutler and colleagues that administration of antibody to TNF protected mice and baboons from bacterial sepsis (Beutler et al., 1985). Eventually, advances in understanding of the role of cytokines in immune and inflammatory disorders led to the development of cytokine-based therapies. 3. Properties of cytokines Before we discuss various cytokine-based therapies it is important to become familiar with some basic properties of cytokines. 1. Pleiotropy, i.e. a single cytokine can act on many different types of cells rather than a single cell type. For example IL-2 initially discovered as a T-cell growth factor also affects B-cell and natural killer (NK) cell growth and differentiation.
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
3
Table 1 Source and physiological role of various cytokines Main sources
Target cell
Major function
B-cells, NK cells, T-cells Activated T- and B-cells, NK cells Stem cells
Proliferation and differentiation, pyrogenic, BM cell proliferation Proliferation and activation Hematopoietic precursor proliferation and differentiation
IL-4
Macrophages, B-cells, dendritic cells T-cells T-cells NK cells Th cells
B-cells, T-cells macrophages
IL-5 IL-6
Th cells Th cells, macrophages, fibroblasts
Eosinophils, B-cells Activated B-cells, plasma cells
IL-7 IL-8 IL-9 IL-10
BM stromal cells, epithelial cells Macrophages T-cell T-cell
Stem cells Neutrophils T-cell B-cells, macrophages
IL-11 IL-12
BM stromal cells T-cells
B-cells NK cells
Proliferation of B and cytotoxic T-cells, enhances MHC class II expression, stimulates IgG and IgE production Proliferation and maturation, stimulates IgA and IgM production Differentiation into plasma cells IgG production B- and T-cell growth factor Chemotaxis, pro-inflammatory Growth and proliferation Inhibits cytokine production and mononuclear cell function, anti-inflammatory Differentiation, induces acute phase proteins Activates NK cells
Interferons IFN-α IFN-β IFN-γ
Leukocytes Fibroblasts T-cells
Various Various Various
Anti-viral, anti-proliferative Anti-viral, anti-proliferative Anti-viral, macrophage activation, increases neutrophil and monocyte function, MHC-I and -II expression on cells
Macrophages Tumor cells Phagocytes, tumor cells
Phagocyte cell activation, endotoxic shock Tumor cytotoxicity, cachexia Chemotactic, phagocytosis, oncostatic, induces other cytokines
Stem cells in BM Stem cells Stem cells Stem cells
Granulocyte production Granulocyte, monocyte, eosinophil production Monocyte production and activation Red blood cell production
Activated T- and B-cells
Inhibit T- and B-cell proliferation, inhibit hematopoiesis, promote wound healing Chemotaxis
Cytokines IL-1 IL-2 IL-3
Tumor necrosis factor TNF-α Macrophages Monocytes TNF-β T-cells Colony stimulating factors G-CSF Fibroblasts, endothelium GM-CSF T-cells, macrophages, fibroblasts M-CSF Fibroblast, endothelium Erythropoietin Endothelium Others TGF-β T-cells and B-cells MIP
Macrophages
T-cells
IL — interleukin, TGF-β — transforming growth factor, MIP — macrophage inhibiting protein, BM — bone marrow.
2. Redundancy, i.e. similar function can be stimulated by different cytokines. For example IL-1 and TNF-α both act as inflammatory mediators. 3. “Multifunctional” refers to the fact that the same cytokine may be able to regulate several different immune functions. Table 1 shows a list of various cytokines, their source, target site of action and major functions. 4. Cytokines as therapeutic agents 4.1. Interferons Interferons (IFN) are a group of naturally occurring glycoproteins that are induced in response to viral infections. They were identified originally on the basis of their anti-viral activity, but were later also found to have anti-cellular/anti-proliferative effects (Baron et al., 1991). This so-called ‘non-anti-viral effects’ of IFN were followed by identification of their immunoregulatory functions involving both innate and adaptive immune responses.
Interferons are generally classified according to their cellular origin and the type of receptors they bind to (Sen and Lengyel, 1992; Jonasch and Haluska, 2001) (Table 1). Type I interferons include over 25 subtypes of interferon-alpha, interferon-beta, interferon-omega, and interferon-tau. There is only one type II interferon, interferon-gamma, which is chemically and pharmacologically distinct from IFN-α and IFN-β. Type I IFNs induce anti-proliferative and anti-viral activity whereas type II IFN, interferon-gamma, has weaker anti-viral activity but more potent immunomodulatory properties, and binds to a completely different receptor than type I IFNs (Sen and Lengyel, 1992; Jonasch and Haluska, 2001). Interferons exert their effects by binding to membrane receptors, which initiates a series of intracellular signaling events. The activation of Janus activated kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway leads to transcriptional activation of genes (O'Shea et al., 2000). The gene products so formed are responsible for the anti-viral, anti-proliferative and immunomodulatory effects of interferons.
4
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
Interferons have no direct action on the virus, nor do they inhibit adsorption of virus on the cell. Rather they block viral multiplication by inhibiting transcriptive and translational ability of viral nucleic acid. From the historical viewpoint, IFN was the first cytokine to be purified and produced in the recombinant form for widespread clinical application. Various interferons approved for clinical use include: IFN-α-2a, 2b, pegylated IFN-α-2a, 2b, IFN-α-n3, IFN-α con-1, IFN-β-1a, IFN-β-1b and IFN-γ-1b (Cada et al., 2000). Table 2 shows a list of these interferons with their approved indications and dosage recommendations. 4.2. Interferon-alpha 4.2.1. IFN-α-2a and IFN-α-2b These are highly purified proteins containing 165 amino acid obtained by recombinant DNA technology using genetically engineered E. coli. However, IFN-α-2b differs from IFN-α-2a by one amino acid i.e. arginine instead of lysine at position 23 (Cada et al., 2000). Both these IFNs are approved for several conditions like chronic hepatitis C (often in combination with nucleoside analog ribavirin), AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (Evans et al., 1991), chronic myelogenous leukemia (Enright and McGlave, 1997) and hairy cell leukemia (Romeril et al., 1989). In addition, IFN-α-2b is indicated for the treatment of malignant melanoma (Agarwala and Kirkwood, 1998), condyloma acuminata (Yildirim et al., 2004), follicular lymphoma (Avilés et al., 2004) and chronic hepatitis B (Janssen et al., 1999). Interferon, whether it is used alone or in combination with ribavirin, is the gold standard treatment for hepatitis C. Several types of interferon-α have been studied and are approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C-IFN-α-2a, IFN-α-2b, pegylated IFN-α and IFN-αcon-1. A meta-analysis of randomized trials using interferon in the treatment of viral hepatitis C in naive patients revealed that only about 17% of patients with chronic hepatitis C obtained a sustained virological response on interferon monotherapy (Thevenot et al., 1999). However combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin permanently eradicated virus in about 40% of patients (McHutchison et al., 1998). Thus, combination therapy has been a major advancement in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in naive patients, as well as in those who have failed or have relapsed after previous IFN monotherapy (Davis et al., 1998). Recent studies have confirmed that long acting pegylated interferons show better anti-viral responses than standard interferon-alpha preparations (Zeuzem et al., 2000; Lindsay et al., 2001). 4.2.2. Peginterferon-alpha These are pegylated forms of interferon-alpha. Pegylation involves attaching a large inactive molecule, polyethylene glycol (PEG), to IFN-alpha by a covalent bond which shields the protein from enzymatic degradation. Pegylation offers many advantages over non-pegylated forms of IFN-extended circulating half-life, increased drug stability, enhanced drug solubility and lower toxicity (Glue et al., 2000). Because pegylated products have substantially long half-life (10 times more than
IFN-α), it allows once weekly dosing in contrast to thrice weekly dosing with conventional IFN. This results in enhanced patient compliance and clinically superior anti-viral activity. However, the major constraint in their use is high cost (2–3 times) in comparison to non-pegylated IFNs (Glue et al., 2000). Pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin is approved for use in patients with chronic hepatitis C and has significantly improved the viral eradication rates (Shepherd et al., 2004; Ferenci, 2006). Published studies have shown that peginterferon-alpha alone results in “sustained response” rates of 30% to almost 40% which increases to over 50% when combined with ribavirin (Zeuzem et al, 2000; Fried et al, 2001). Thus presently the best available treatment for chronic hepatitis C appears to be peginterferon-alpha plus ribavirin. However, the issue regarding patients being unresponsive to even this combination therapy, remains unsolved and needs further research. Pegylated interferon therapy is in advanced phase of evaluation for treatment of acute hepatitis C infection in HIV-coinfected individuals. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00132210). Other than hepatitis, peginterferon-alpha is also being evaluated in patients with stage IV melanoma to study its anti-tumor efficacy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00049530). 4.2.3. IFN-α con-1 IFN-α con-1 also known as consensus interferon is a synthetic recombinant product containing 166 amino acid sequences. It varies from IFN-α-2a and IFN-α-2b by 20 amino acids. These amino acid differences lead to different binding affinities at the cell surface receptors and ultimately differences in potency among these interferons. IFN-α con-1 is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C viral infection and is the only interferon effective in the treatment of relapsers and non-responders to previous interferon-alpha therapy (Melian and Plosker, 2001). When given alone at a dose of 9 μg three times a week for 24 weeks to treatment naive patients, IFN-α con-1 was found to be safe and effective with overall sustained response in 16% of patients (Kao et al., 2000). Among nonresponders, 13% of those who do not respond to an initial course of alpha interferon monotherapy and 58% of those who relapse after initially responding to treatment, experience sustained viral eradication with 15 μg of α con-1 three times a week for 48 weeks (Keeffe and Hollinger, 1997; Melian and Plosker, 2001). Similarly, 40–44% of patients who do not respond to IFN-α-2b and rivabirin therapy respond well to IFN-α con-1 and ribavirin combination. Current research is now devoted to assess the effectiveness of IFN-α con-1 plus ribavirin in those patients who do not respond to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00456248). Promising results from this research will significantly improve the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. 4.2.4. Interferon-α-n3 Interferon-α-n3 is a natural, human IFN-α obtained from human leukocytes (induced by murine virus) for clinical use (Jonasch and Haluska, 2001). It is approved for the treatment of refractory condyloma acuminata (CA), which include venereal or genital warts (Jonasch and Haluska, 2001; Table 2). The safety and
Table 2 Glossary of treatment with cytokines and their approved indications Generic name
Approved indications
Recommended adult dose
Route of administration
Half-life
Adverse effects
References
IFN-α-2a
3 MU three times weekly for 12 months
s.c or i.m
2–5 h
Romeril et al. (1989), Evans et al. (1991), Enright and McGlave (1997)
5 MU OD or 10 MU three times weekly for 16 weeks
s.c, i.v or i.m
2–5 h
Flu-like syndrome, thrombocytopenia, granulocytopenia, elevation in transaminases, neuropsychiatric symptoms Same as with IFN-α-2a
IFN-α con-1
Chronic hepatitis C Hairy cell leukemia Chronic myelogenous leukemia, AIDS-related KS Chronic hepatitis B Chronic hepatitis C Condyloma acuminata Follicular lymphoma Hairy cell leukemia AIDS-related KS Malignant melanoma Chronic hepatitis C
s.c
6–10 h
Same as with IFN-α-2a
Condos et al. (1997)
Interferon-α-n3
Condyloma acuminata
Intralesional inj
3–8 h
Same as with IFN-α-2a
Pegylated IFN-α-2a
Chronic hepatitis C
9 μg three times weekly for 24 weeks For relapse or non-responders—15 μg SC three times weekly for 24 weeks 250,000 IU (0.05 mL) per wart, twice weekly for 8 weeks 180 μg once weekly
s.c
80 h
Pegylated IFN-α-2b
Chronic hepatitis C
40–150 μg once weekly
s.c
40 h
IFN-β-1a
Relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis
30 μg once weekly
i.v, i.m or s.c
10 h
Headache, fatigue, myalgia, injection site reactions Headache, fatigue, myalgia, injection site reactions Fever, chills, myalgia
Friedman-Kien (1995), Friedman-Kien et al. (1988) Shepherd et al. (2004), Weinstock-Guttman and Jacobs (2000) Shepherd et al. (2004), Ferenci (2006)
IFN-β-1b IFN-γ-1b
Relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis Malignant osteopetrosis, Chronic granulomatous disease
i.v or s.c i.v, s.c or i.m
8 min–4 h 35 min
Fever, chills, myalgia Fever, diarrhea, headache, muscle soreness, malaise and chills
Anakinra (rhIL-1ra)
Rheumatoid arthritis Sepsis Metastatic renal cell cancer, metastatic melanoma
8,000,000 IU/inj every 2nd day Body surface area (BSA) N0.5 m2–50 μg /m2 (1 million IU/m2) thrice weekly, if BSA b 0.5 m2–1.5 μg /kg/dose s.c TIW 1–2 mg/kg
s.c
4–6 h
Injection site reactions, pneumonia
Kavanaugh (2006)
600,000 IU/kg every 8 h by a 15-minute IV infusion for a max of 14 doses
i.v
85 min
Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) and flu-like symptoms, low blood pressure, decreased kidney and lung function, respiratory distress, cardiac abnormalities, changes in mental status Nausea, constipation, pain, urinary tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection. Nausea, constipation, headache
Schmidinger et al. (2004), Atkins et al. (1999)
IFN-α-2b
Weinstock-Guttman and Jacobs (2000), Ferenci (2006), Pakdaman et al. (2006), Cocco et al. (2006) Weinstock-Guttman and Jacobs (2000) Key et al. (1995), Bemiller et al. (1995)
Basiliximab
Prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in renal transplant patients
2 doses of 20 mg by i.v infusion, one 2 h prior to transplant and the second 4 days after transplant
i.v
7 days
Daclizumab
Prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in renal transplant patients
i.v
20 days
Epoietin alpha
Anemia due to chronic renal failure, HIV infected patients, chemotherapy, primary bone marrow disorders Same as epoietin alpha
1 mg/kg given 24 h prior to transplant followed by 4 doses at 14 day intervals (2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks) 50–150 IU/kg three times weekly
i.v
8h
Hypertension, thrombotic complication, allergic reactions
Provenzano et al. (2005)
0.45 μg/kg once weekly
i.v/s.c
25 h
Ibboston and Goa (2001)
Cancer patients receiving myelosuppresive chemotherapy, patients with AML receiving either induction or consolidation chemotherapy, cancer patients receiving BM transplant, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSC), severe chronic neutropenia Same as filgrastim
5 μg/kg/day for 14–21 days
i.v/s.c
3–5 h
Mild transient injection site pain, rest same as epoietin alpha Skeletal muscle pain, bone pain, alopecia, fever, rash, injection site reaction
5–10 μg/kg/day for 4 days
s.c
45–60 h
Following induction chemotherapy in patients with AML, to accelerate recovery after BM transplantation, PBSC
250 μg/m2/day for 7–10 days
s.c
2–5 h
Darbepoietin alpha Filgrastim (GM-CSF)
Pegfilgrastim (pegylated GM-CSF) Sargramostim (G-CSF)
Bone pain, mylagia, alopecia, fever, rash, edema Bone pain, malaise, fever, diarrhea, edema, rash
Gelder et al. (2004), Ramirez and Marino (2007), Chapman and Keating (2003) Gelder et al. (2004), Chapman and Keating (2003)
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
Aldesleukin (IL-2)
Pol et al. (1999), Romeril et al. (1989), Evans et al. (1991), Enright and McGlave (1997), Yildirim et al. (2004), Neri et al. (2006)
Ibboston and Goa (2001), Neri et al. (2006)
Schmidinger et al. (2004) Andre et al. (2003)
5
6
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
efficacy of IFN-α-n3 has been evaluated in several multicentric trials. Intralesional injections of IFN-α-n3 (twice weekly) for up to eight weeks completely eliminated warts in 62% patients compared with only 21% of placebo-treated patients (Friedman-Kien et al., 1988). In another study, the efficacy of IFN-α-n3 has been studied in patients with warts refractory to previous treatment, overall, 80% of patients treated with IFN-α-n3 had a complete or partial resolution of genital warts compared to only 44% of those treated with placebo (Friedman-Kien, 1995). Side effects, usually flu-like symptoms, occurred briefly after the injections but disappeared before the end of the third week of therapy. An emerging body of research suggests that IFN-alpha-n3 has anti-HIV activity and it is postulated that a combination of IFN-alpha-n3 with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors may be of clinical utility in patients infected with HIV (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00215852). 4.3. Adverse effects of interferon-alpha Injection site reactions are among the most common adverse reactions reported in clinical trials. Other common complaints are fever, fatigue, myalgia and headache. In addition, patients should be monitored closely with periodic clinical and laboratory evaluations, since treatment with alpha interferons may cause or aggravate fatal or life-threatening neuropsychiatric, autoimmune, ischemic, and infectious disorders. There have been some reports of depression and suicidal behavior with the use of interferon-alpha and because of this they require cautious use in patients with history of depression (Table 2). Patients with persistently severe or worsening signs or symptoms of these conditions should be withdrawn from therapy. In many but not all cases these disorders resolve after stopping interferon-alpha therapy. 4.4. Interferon-beta 4.4.1. Interferon-β-1a and interferon-β-1b IFN-β-1a and 1b are glycoproteins containing 166 amino acids, produced by recombinant DNA technology. Interferon-β was the first clinically available agent demonstrated to be effective in modifying the disease course in patients with multiple sclerosis (Jonasch and Haluska, 2001). The efficacy of IFN-β-1a and β-1b in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been examined in large placebo-controlled, double-blind and numerous smaller studies. These studies demonstrated that IFN-β decreased relapses and probability of sustained clinical disability progression in patients with relapsing remitting MS (WeinstockGuttman and Jacobs, 2000). Both forms of IFN-β had beneficial effects on disease process. IFN-β-1a had an additional benefit of slowing or preventing the development of MS-related brain atrophy (Weinstock-Guttman and Jacobs, 2000). The mechanism of action of IFN-β in MS is not fully understood (Vilcek and Feldmann, 2004). IFN-β might act as an antagonist of endogenous IL-4 and particularly IFN-γ which is known to exacerbate MS. IFN-β also influences the function of blood brain barrier by inhibiting cell adhesion, cell migration and metalloproteinase activity thereby halting inflammation in the
central nervous system. It also induces shift of cytokine profile to an anti-inflammatory phenotype (Vilcek and Feldmann, 2004). IFN-β is now under clinical trials for the treatment of patients with intermediate uveitis. The purpose of this study (phase 3) is to investigate whether interferon-beta results in superior efficacy when compared to standard treatment with methotrexate for the treatment of intermediate uveitis and macular edema (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00344253). 4.5. Interferon-gamma IFN-gamma is the principal cytokine for activating phagocytes and this effect is unique to IFN-γ which is not seen with other interferon preparations. Clinical studies in patients using recombinant IFN-γ have revealed a broad range of biological activities including enhancement of oxidative metabolism of tissue macrophages, enhancement of antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and natural killer (NK) cell activity. It also induces the production of major histocompatibility complex-I (MHC-I) molecules, MHC-II molecules, and co-stimulatory molecules by antigen presenting cells in order to promote cell-mediated immunity. It activates and increases the anti-microbial and tumoricidal activity of monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells (Sen and Lengyel, 1992; Shalaby et al, 1985). 4.5.1. Interferon-gamma-1b It is a genetically engineered recombinant cytokine containing 140 amino acids. Phagocyte stimulating effects of IFN-γ have been the basis for its approval in two rare conditions — severe, malignant osteopetrosis and chronic granulomatous disease. Treatment with IFN-γ-1b for both conditions greatly improves the ability of the patients to fight infectious diseases. Severe, malignant osteopetrosis is a congenital condition which is life-threatening. The bone formation occurs at a nearnormal rate, but there is a defect in bone resorption—the osteoclasts do not work effectively. The result of this imbalance is increased bone mass and reduced bone marrow cavity which is unable to support adequate development of blood cells, and the resulting thrombocytopenia, anemia, and infectious complications commonly cause death within the first decade of life. In a study that examined six patients suffering from osteopetrosis, the use of IFN-γ was found to be effective and a 96% decrease in the frequency of infections was noted. IFN-γ was found to increase bone resorption and hematopoiesis, and improve leukocyte function (Key et al., 1995). But more clinical evidence is needed to substantiate this fact. Chronic granulomatous disease is an inherited disorder of phagocytic cells, which results from an inability of phagocytes to produce bactericidal superoxide anions (O2−). This leads to recurrent life-threatening bacterial and fungal infections. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic granulomatous disease, 128 patients were randomized to either receive IFN-γ (n = 63) or placebo (n = 65). IFN-γ produced a 67% decrease in relative risk of serious infections and a twofold reduction in the number of primary serious infections (30 on placebo versus 14 on IFN-γ,
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
P = 0.002) as compared to the placebo group. Moreover, the length of hospitalization was significantly less for all clinical events in the IFN-γ group (1493 days in placebo versus 497 days in IFN-γ, P = 0.02) (Bemiller et al., 1995). Recent literature survey has revealed that IFN-γ-1b is also being considered as an attractive treatment option for patients with refractory multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Since IFN-γ plays a main role in the immunity to TB, immunotherapy directed at combating immunosuppression and enhancing the host's own immune response is an attractive approach to supplement conventional chemotherapy for multidrug-resistant TB. Keeping this in view, an aerosolized form of IFN-γ-1b has been evaluated and was found to be well tolerated and useful as an adjuvant in patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (Condos et al., 1997; Koh et al., 2004). Similar results from another study in which IFN-γ-1b was administered by subcutaneous route have been encouraging (Kim et al., 2004). However, further studies are needed to determine the optimum dose, the administration route and the duration of therapy with adjuvant IFN-gamma in patients with refractory multidrug-resistant TB. 4.6. Interleukin-2 (IL-2, aldesleukin) IL-2, also known as T-cell growth factor is a potent immunomodulator whose major function is activation of various cells of immune system including helper T-cells, cytotoxic T-cells, B-cells, NK cells and macrophages. It mediates its action by binding to its corresponding cell surface receptor. At low doses IL-2 preferentially stimulates natural killer cells, while at higher doses delivered intermittently, it stimulates CD4+ cells to reproduce (Kovacs et al., 1996). Aldesleukin is the genetically engineered product which possesses the biological activity of human native IL-2. It is the first FDA approved drug treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC), for which there is no standard treatment (Schmidinger et al., 2004). Another condition where aldesleukin has been approved includes metastatic melanoma refractory to conventional treatment (Atkins et al., 1999). The exact mechanism of its anti-tumor activity is not known. However, studies have shown that IL-2 enhances lymphocyte mitogenesis as well as supports the proliferation and clonal expansion of lymphokine activated killer cells and NK cells which specifically attack tumor cells. It also enhances the production of other cytokines such as TNF, IL-1 and IFN-γ. In seven multicentric clinical trials in 255 patients with metastatic RCC, who received an infusion of 600,000 IU/kg every 8 h for up to 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) and then again for up to 5 days on days 15 to 19, a total response rate of 15% was observed, of which 4% of patients showed complete response and 11% had partial response. Onset of tumor regression has been observed as early as 4 weeks after the completion of the first course of treatment and tumor regression may continue for up to 12 months after the start of treatment. Median duration of response observed was 23.2 months (Schmidinger et al., 2004). Side effects following the use of aldesleukin are dose-related and need special mention. Most adverse reactions are self-
7
limiting and are usually reversible within 2 or 3 days of discontinuation of therapy. The most frequently reported serious adverse reactions with high doses include capillary leak syndrome (CLS) which results in hypotension, renal dysfunction with oliguria/anuria, pulmonary congestion and mental status changes (Schmidinger et al., 2004). Other serious adverse effects include myocardial infarction, bowel perforation, seizures and coma. Because of the severe adverse events, a thorough clinical evaluation is warranted and it is essential that administration of aldesleukin is carried out in a hospital setting under adequate medical supervision. Of the cytokines being researched in the setting of HIV, IL-2 is the most widely studied and furthest along in development. Intermittent infusion of IL-2 induces increase in CD4+ cell count levels that far surpass those achieved by any other therapy researched for HIV (Kovacs et al., 1996; Davey et al., 2000; Pau and Tavel, 2002). An emerging body of research suggests that IL-2-stimulated cells thrive better in the face of HIV infection than other CD4+ cells. Chief dose-limiting toxic effects of IL-2 therapy in this setting include constitutional symptoms (fever, malaise, and fatigue) and asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia (Kovacs et al., 1996). Large scale studies are in progress to see if IL-2, in addition to anti-HIV therapy, reduces disease progression and prolongs life (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00001131, NCT00110812). 5. Anti-cytokines as therapeutic agents 5.1. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors Tumor necrosis factor family is primarily involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis, but TNF-α has additional pro-inflammatory properties. TNF family receptors have four extracellular domains; they include receptors for soluble TNF-α and TNF-β as well as membrane-bound CD40 (important for B-cell and macrophage activation) and Fas (which signals the cell to undergo apoptosis). TNF-α is a multifunctional cytokine which participates in the pathogenesis of various diseases including autoimmune, inflammatory, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, septic shock and congestive heart failure (Bazzoni and Beutler, 1996; Bolger and Anker, 2000; Singh and Suruchi, 2004). It is the principal cytokine that mediates acute inflammation, activates platelets and also plays a role in the genesis of fever, anemia and cachexia (Bazzoni and Beutler, 1996; O'Dell, 1999). TNF-α also mediates many of the inflammatory processes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) including immune cell activation, proliferation and apoptosis and regulation of leukocyte movement. Indeed, the laboratory observation coupled with the studies in animal models has indicated the central role of TNF-α in rheumatoid arthritis and has led to the emergence of TNF blocking strategies. Currently available anti-TNF-α strategies involve either administration of anti-TNF-α antibody or soluble TNF receptor to mop up circulating TNF-α. These inhibitors act by binding to TNF before it binds to receptors on nearby cells and prevent initiation of apoptosis or the inflammatory response.
8
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
The remarkable anti-inflammatory activity of the first neutralizing monoclonal anti-TNF antibody, infliximab, in RA patients has been well demonstrated (O'Dell, 1999; Maini and Taylor, 2000) and has subsequently stimulated the development of improved anti-TNF agents such as fully humanized antibody (adalimumab) and engineered fusion proteins of TNF soluble receptors and Fc fragments (etanercept), with reduced immunogenicity and a prolonged half-life. While infliximab and adalimumab are recombinant monoclonal antibodies which bind only TNF-α, etanercept is a soluble TNF receptor fusion protein that binds to both TNF-α as well as TNF-β (Jarvis and Faulds, 1999). Comparative features of 3 approved TNF inhibitors are mentioned in Table 3. 5.1.1. Indications All 3 anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and Crohn's disease. Only etanercept has been approved additionally for juvenile chronic arthritis since TNF-β is elevated in inflamed tissues in this condition. Currently, anti-TNF blocking agents are the most promising therapy available for patients of rheumatoid arthritis unresponsive to standard disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (Sharma et al., 2004). In contrast to older DMARDs, these agents have rapid onset of action with fewer side effects and have pronounced disease reducing activity when administered as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate. Since there have been no head to head trials comparing different TNF inhibitors, it is difficult to say which agent is more effective than the other and the choice of drug therefore depends on the patient's preference and the prescriber's experience with the particular TNF inhibitor. Recently, a literature analysis by Hochberg et al., revealed that the addition
of either adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in patients who had an incomplete response to methotrexate is associated with a comparable response as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20% improvement i.e. ACR20 or American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 50% improvement i.e. ACR50 responder index after 24– 30 weeks (Hochberg et al., 2003). However, additional studies are needed to better define the differences and optimize the clinical utilization of these agents. The most common side effect seen in clinical trials with antiTNF agents has been injection site reactions which do not require discontinuation of drug and becomes less prominent with continued use. Although, TNF inhibition is realized as an effective modality for treating autoimmune diseases, it does not come without potential cost to the host and there remains a risk of an increased rate of infection and malignancy. Thus, the major contraindications to the use of anti-TNF agents include previously untreated tuberculosis, recurrent chest infections or bronchiectasis and multiple sclerosis or demyelinating illness. The scope of therapy using TNF-α blockers is now evolving to target other diseases like diabetes, psoriasis, asthma, malignancy and stroke (Singh and Suruchi, 2004). Currently, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is recruiting patients to investigate whether etanercept results in improved inflammatory indices, glucose tolerance and endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00413400). Results of these studies are awaited and will throw light on the clinical usefulness of these cytokine inhibitors. 5.2. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist Interleukin-1 (IL-1) family genes encode three different peptides, IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra)
Table 3 Comparative pharmacological and therapeutic status of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab Infliximab
Etanercept
Adalimumab
Structure
Chimeric (25% mouse/75% human) IgG1 monoclonal antibody
Fully humanized anti-TNF monoclonal IgG1 antibody
Binds to
Binds only TNF-α
Dose
3–10 mg/kg weekly at weeks 0, 2, 6; then every 2 months Intravenously No 9–12 days Rheumatoid arthritis (in combination with other DMARDs like methotrexate), Crohn's disease, ankylosing spondylitis
Recombinant fusion protein made of two soluble p75 TNF receptor and constant Fc portion of human IgG1 Binds 2 molecules of TNF-α as well as TNF-β 25 mg twice a week
40 mg once in 2 weeks
Subcutaneously Yes 4–5 days RA (alone or in combination with methotrexate), ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis Non-neutralizing antibodies
Subcutaneously Yes 10–20 days Moderate to severe RA (alone or in combination with methotrexate), psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease Neutralizing antibodies in vitro (8%)
Absent Less allergic as compared to infliximab, mild injection site reactions, serious infections, TB and sepsis
Seen Injection site reactions, upper respiratory infections (sinus infections), headache, rash, nausea, serious infections, TB and sepsis
Route of administration Self administer Half-life Approved indications
Autoantibodies Tachyphylaxis Adverse effects
Neutralizing antibodies (7–53% after 5 infusions of 1–10 mg/kg) Seen Acute infusion reactions—fever, chills, pruritis, chest pain, dyspnoea, flushing, urticaria, hypersensitivity reactions, serious infections, TB and sepsis
Binds only TNF-α
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
respectively (Mao et al., 2000). Like TNF-α, IL-1 production is induced in response to inflammatory stimuli and mediates various physiologic responses including inflammation and immune reactions. In normal homeostasis, the actions of IL-1 are maintained in balance by IL-1ra and other natural IL-1 inhibitors. However, a variety of diseases including autoimmune diseases, infections, solid tumors, leukemia, Alzheimer's disease, trauma, hemodialysis, ischemic myocardial infarction, asthma, and graft versus host disease, are associated with increased IL-1 production (Dinarello, 1996). IL-1 is also strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis where it causes cartilage degradation by rapid loss of proteoglycans as well as stimulation of bone resorption. Thus, a biologically active engineered product of IL-1 ra, anakinra, has been developed for clinical use in this condition. 5.2.1. Anakinra It is the recombinant non-glycosylated form of human IL-1 ra (rhIL-1ra) produced in Escherichia coli and is approved for use in the treatment of patients with RA unresponsive to one or more disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Anakinra blocks the biologic activity of IL-1 by competitively inhibiting IL-1 binding to the interleukin-1 type I receptor (IL-1RI), which is expressed in a wide variety of tissues and organs. The safety and efficacy of anakinra has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials in combination with other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or as a monotherapy (Nuki et al., 2002; Fleischmann et al., 2003; Cohen et al., 2002; Kavanaugh, 2006). In all the studies, patients treated with anakinra in combination with methotrexate achieved an ACR20 or higher magnitude of response (ACR50 and ACR70) than patients treated with methotrexate and placebo. The most commonly reported adverse event was injection site reaction. However, the major concern with anakinra use is the risk of serious infections and it is therefore contraindicated in the presence of active infection. Because of the same reason anakinra should not be used in conjunction with anti-TNF-alpha agents. In addition, patients should also be monitored for reversible thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, the latter exacerbated by concomitant methotrexate use. In the present scenario, both IL-1 receptor antagonist and TNF-α blockers have proved to be as efficacious as conventional DMARDs, however their enormous cost and potential to cause long term side effects remain a concern. Therefore, randomized head-to-head studies are needed to determine which of these drugs are most effective and safe for rheumatoid arthritis. Other disease states for which anakinra is under research and may prove to be of therapeutic benefit include cerebral ischemia, severe sepsis, acute stroke, diabetes, asthma and inflammatory bowel disease (Loddick and Rothwell, 1996; Opal et al., 1997; Emsley et al., 2005). 5.3. IL-2 receptor antagonists Interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) is a heterotrimeric protein composed of α, β and γ chains (Minami et al., 1993). The α and β chains are involved in binding IL-2, while signal transduction
9
following cytokine interaction is carried out by the γ-chain, along with the β subunit. IL-2R is expressed on the surface of certain immune cells, such as antigen-activated T-cells, B-cells and is involved in their proliferation. Thus, the number of disease states is linked to over-expression of IL-2R-α such as autoimmune diseases, allograft rejection, a variety of lymphoid neoplasms like adult T-cell leukemia (ATL), mycosis fungoides, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, Hodgkins disease and some B-cell neoplasms (Morris and Waldmann, 2000). Because there is a definite link between IL-2R-α overexpression and occurrence of several diseases, therapies have evolved to curb IL-2R-α over activity. One approach to inhibit IL-2-induced T-cell proliferation is through monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of IL-2 receptor. Two such monoclonal antibody preparations available for use include basiliximab and daclizumab, a chimeric and a humanized antibody, respectively (Gelder et al., 2004) (Table 2). These are approved for prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in renal transplant patients in combination with other immunosuppressive agents (glucocorticoids, cyclosporine). Basiliximab induction demonstrated an excellent safety profile, with no increase in the incidence of malignancy, infections or death (Ramirez and Marino, 2007). Results of clinical trials have shown that both these drugs are equally efficacious and allow the use of corticosteroid free regimens in renal transplant recipients (Chapman and Keating, 2003). The overall efficacy, tolerability, ease of administration and cost effectiveness make these drugs an attractive option for prophylaxis. Other approaches to IL-2R targeted treatment of various cancers are under study and include use of ligand–toxin fusion protein and immunotoxins (Saleh et al., 1998; Kreitman et al., 2000). 6. Chemokines Chemokines are small peptides that are potent activators and chemoattractants for leukocyte subpopulations and some nonhematopoietic cells. These chemotactic cytokines belong to the chemokine superfamily, which can be divided into 4 groups or families (CXC, CX3C, CC, and C) based on a cysteine motif. Their actions are mediated by a family of 7-transmembrane Gprotein-coupled receptors (Onuffer and Horuk, 2002). Chemokines are known to function as regulatory molecules in leukocyte maturation, traffic, homing of lymphocytes and in the development of lymphoid tissues. Besides these functions in the immune system, they also play a critical role in many pathophysiological processes such as allergic responses, infectious and autoimmune diseases, angiogenesis, inflammation, tumor growth and hematopoietic development (Onuffer and Horuk, 2002). Alteration and inappropriate expression of chemokine receptors is thought to be implicated in multiple sclerosis, asthma, some cancers, rheumatoid arthritis and some cardiovascular diseases. In addition, certain chemokines and their receptors are involved in HIV pathogenesis. The discovery of chemokine receptors as co-receptors for HIV-1 has opened the door for a number of novel anti-viral approaches.
10
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
Table 4 Various cytokine therapies in clinical development Cytokine
Generic name/code
Drug
Phase of clinical development
Potential therapeutic use
IL-1R-α IL-2 IL-4 IL-5 IL-6
Anakinra Aldesleukin – Mepolizumab Tocilizumab
Recombinant IL-1R-α antagonist Recombinant IL-2 IL-4 coupled to Pseudomonas exotoxin Anti-IL5 monoclonal antibody Humanized IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody
Phase II Phase III Phase II Phase II Phase III
IL-8 IL-9 IL-10 IL-11
ABX-IL-8 IL-9mAb Tenovil Neumega
Fully human IL-8 monoclonal antibody Anti-interleukin-9 monoclonal antibody Recombinant IL-10 protein Recombinant IL-11 protein
IL-12
ABT-874
Humanized anti-IL 12 monoclonal antibody
Phase II Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase II Phase II
IL-15 IL-18 IL-21 IFN-γ TNF-α
AMG-714 – 494C10 Fontolizumab Certolizumab pegol
Humanized anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody Recombinant IL-18 binding protein Recombinant human interleukin-21 Humanized anti-IFN-γ antibody Pegylated Fab fragment of a humanized antibody to TNF
Osteoarthritis HIV Malignant glioma Allergic asthma Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, COPD Asthma Crohn's disease Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis Rheumatoid arthritis RA, psoriasis Malignant melanoma Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis
As knowledge of the role of chemokine receptors has expanded from autoimmunity to AIDS, the importance of these intervention therapies has grown. The promise of highly specific therapies for several diseases, based on chemokine receptor antagonists, is on the horizon. In the present review our focus was mainly on approved cytokines and anti-cytokine agents (Table 2); however, many other agents are emerging for use in a wide range of medical settings (Table 4). 7. Other cytokines of possible importance Numerous other cytokines, including IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-18, IL-21, etc. have been used experimentally in animals and are being tried in patients for various conditions, but have not yet reached the market. The list of few such cytokines is mentioned in Table 4. 8. Future perspectives Cytokine therapy has and will be successful when diseasecausing mechanisms are relatively “simple” and cytokine driven. However, given the pleiotropic and redundant nature of cytokines, a future direction in complex disorders may be the simultaneous inactivation/activation of multiple cytokines. The latest development in the field of cytokines is the use of cytokine gene therapy for treatment of various cancers (Podhajcer et al., 2007). But the real effectiveness of this approach would be evident only with further studies in times to come. 9. Conclusion Increasingly, cytokine-based drugs and anti-cytokines are playing a crucial role in the understanding of pathogenesis as well as management of several diseases. Research is continuing
Phase II Phase II Phase II Phase II Phase III
with an aim to develop new therapies, refine those already in use, and establish the safest and most effective dosage levels. Due to these on-going studies, it is imperative for clinicians to stay abreast with the latest information for the benefit of their patients. References Agarwala, S.S., Kirkwood, J.M., 1998. Adjuvant interferon treatment for melanoma. Hematol./Oncol. Clin. North Am. 12, 823–833. Andre, M., Baudoux, E., Bron, D., Canon, J.L., D'Hondt, V., Fassotte, M.F., D'Hondt, L., Fillet, G., Humblet, Y., Jerusalem, G., Vermeulen, P., Symann, M., Beguin, Y., 2003. Phase III randomized study comparing 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with chemotherapy, followed by intensification and autologous transplantation in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. Transfusion 43, 50–57. Atkins, M.B., Lotze, M.T., Dutcher, J.P., Fisher, R.I., Weiss, G., Margolin, K., Abrams, J., Sznol, M., Parkinson, D., Hawkins, M., Paradise, C., Kunkel, L., Rosenberg, S.A., 1999. High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 2105–2116. Avilés, A., Neri, N., Huerta-Guzmán, J., Pérez, F., Sotelo, L., 2004. Interferon alpha 2b as maintenance therapy improves outcome in follicular lymphoma. Leuk. Lymphoma 45, 2247–2251. Baron, S., Tyring, S.K., Fleischmann, W.R., Coppenhaver, D.H., Niesel, D.W., Klimpel, G.R., Stanton, G.J., Hughes, T.K., 1991. The interferons. Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. JAMA. 266, 1375–1383. Bazzoni, F., Beutler, B., 1996. The tumor necrosis factor ligand and receptor families. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 1717–1725. Bemiller, L.S., Roberts, D.H., Starko, K.M., Curnutte, J.T., 1995. Safety and effectiveness of long-term interferon gamma therapy in patients with chronic granulomatous disease. Blood Cells Mol. Diseases 21, 239–247. Bennett, I.L., Beeson, P.B., 1953. Studies on the pathogenesis of fever, II: characterization of fever producing substances from polymorphonuclear leukocytes and from the fluid of sterile exudates. J. Exp. Med. 98, 493–508. Beutler, B., Milsark, I.W., Cerami, A.C., 1985. Passive immunization against cachectin/tumor necrosis factor protects mice from lethal effect of endotoxin. Science 229, 869–871. Bloom, B.R., Bennett, B., 1966. Mechanism of a reaction in vitro associated with delayed-type hypersensitivity. Science 153, 80–82.
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12 Bolger, A.P., Anker, S.D., 2000. Tumor necrosis factor in chronic heart failure. A peripheral view on pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and therapeutic implications. Drugs 60, 1244–1254. Cada, D.J., Covington, T.R., et al. (Eds.), 2000. Drug Facts and Comparisons. Facts and Comparisons, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 1571d–1580d. Carswell, E.A., Old, L.J., Kassel, R.L., Green, S., Fiore, N., Williamson, B., 1975. An endotoxin induced serum factor that causes necrosis of tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72, 3666–3670. Chapman, T.M., Keating, G.M., 2003. Basiliximab: a review of its use as induction therapy in renal transplantation. Drugs 63, 2803–2835. Cocco, E., Marchi, P., Floris, G., Mascia, M.G., Deriu, M., Sirca, A., Mamusa, E., Lai, M., Mura, M., Mallarini, G., Marrosu, M.G., 2006. Effect of dose and frequency of interferon beta-1a administration on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging parameters in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Funct. Neurology 21, 145–149. Cohen, S., Bigazzi, P.E., Yoshida, T., 1974. Similarities of T cell function in cellmediated immunity and antibody production. Cell. Immunol. 2, 150–159. Cohen, S., Hurd, E., Cush, J., Schiff, M., Weinblatt, M.E., Moreland, L.W., Kremer, J., Bear, M.B., Rich, W.J., McCabe, D., 2002. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in combination with methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 614–624. Cohen, S., Bigazzi, P.E., Yoshida, T., 2004. Cytokine: more than a new word, a new concept proposed by Stanley Cohen thirty years ago. Cytokine 28, 242–247. Condos, R., Rom, W.N., Schluger, N.W., 1997. Treatment of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis with interferon-gamma via aerosol. Lancet 349, 1513–1515. Davey, R.T., Murphy, R.L., Graziano, F.M., Boswell, S.L., Pavia, A.T., Cancio, M., Nadler, J.P., Chaitt, D.G., Dewar, R.L., Sahner, D.K., Duliege, A.M., Capra, W.B., Leong, W.P., Giedlin, M.A., Lane, H.C., Kahn, J.O., 2000. Immunologic and virologic effects of subcutaneous IL-2 treatment in combination with antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 284, 183–189. David, J.R., 1966. Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell–antigen interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 56, 72–77. Davis, G.L., Esteban-Mur, R., Rustgi, V., Hoefs, J., Gordon, S.C., Trepo, C., Shiffman, M.L., Zeuzem, S., Craxi, A., Ling, M.H., Albrecht, J., 1998. Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C. N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 1493–1499. Dinarello, C.A., 1996. Biological basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 87, 2095–2147. Dumonde, D.C., Wolstencroft, R.A., Panayi, G.S., Matthew, M., Morley, J., Howson, W.T., 1969. “Lymphokines”: non-antibody mediators of cellular immunity generated by lymphocyte activation. Nature 224, 38–42. Emsley, H.C., Smith, C.J., Georgiou, R.F., Vail, A., Hopkins, S.J., Rothwell, N.J., Tyrrell, P.J., Acute Stroke Investigators, 2005. Acute stroke investigators. A randomized phase II study of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in acute stroke patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76, 1366–1372. Enright, H., McGlave, P.B., 1997. Biology and treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Oncology (Huntingt) 11, 1295–1300. Evans, L.M., Itri, L.M., Campion, M., Wyler-Plaut, R., Krown, S.E., Groopman, J.E., Goldsweig, H., Volberding, P.A., West, S.B., Mitsuyasu, R.T., 1991. Interferon-alpha 2a in the treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Kaposi's sarcoma. J. Immunother. 10, 39–50. Ferenci, P., 2006. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C: the role of combination therapy today, tomorrow and in the future. Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. 52, 157–174. Fleischmann, R.M., Schechtman, J., Bennett, R., Handel, M.L., Burmester, G.R., Tesser, J., Modafferi, D., Poulakos, J., Sun, G., 2003. Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (r-metHuIL-1ra), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 48, 927–934. Fried, M.W., Shiffman, M.L., Reddy, R.K., Smith, C., Marino, G., Goncales, F., et al., 2001. Pegylated interferon alfa-2a in combination with ribavirin: efficacy and safety results from a phase III, randomized, actively controlled, multicenter study [abstract]. Gastroenterology 120, A55. Friedman-Kien, A.E., 1995. Management of condylomata acuminata with Alferon N injection, interferon alfa-n3 (human leukocyte derived). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 172, 1359–1368.
11
Friedman-Kien, A.E., Eron, L.J., Conant, M., Growdon, W., Badiak, H., Bradstreet, P.W., Fedorczyk, D., Trout, J.R., Plasse, T.F., 1988. Natural interferon alfa for treatment of condylomata acuminata. JAMA. 259, 533–538. Gelder, T.V., Warle, M., Meulen, R.G.T., 2004. Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies in transplantation: what is the basis for choice? Drugs 64, 1737–1741. Glue, P., Fang, J.W., Rouzier-Panis, R., Raffanel, C., Sabo, R., Gupta, S.K., Salfi, M., Jacobs, S., 2000. Pegylated interferon-alpha2b: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and preliminary efficacy data. Hepatitis C Intervention Therapy Group. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 68, 556–567. Hochberg, M.C., Tracy, J.K., Holt, M.H., Flores, R.H., 2003. Comparison of the efficacy of the tumour necrosis factor a blocking agents adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab when added to methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62, ii13–ii16. Ibboston, T., Goa, K.L., 2001. Darbepoeitin alfa. Drugs 61 (14), 2097–2104. Isaacs, A., Lindenmann, J., 1957. Virus interference. 1. The interferon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 147, 258–267. Janssen, H.L., Gerken, G., Carreno, V., Marcellin, P., Naoumov, N.V., Craxi, A., Ring-Larsen, H., Kitis, G., Van Hattum, J., de Vries, R.A., Michielsen, P.P., ten Kate, F.J., Hop, W.C., Heijtink, R.A., Honkoop, P., Schalm, S.W., 1999. Interferon alfa for chronic hepatitis B infection: increased efficacy of prolonged treatment. The European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP). Hepatology 30, 238–243. Jarvis, B., Faulds, D., 1999. Etanercept—a review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 57, 945–966. Jonasch, E., Haluska, F.G., 2001. Interferon in oncological practice: review of interferon biology, clinical applications, and toxicities. Oncologist 6, 34–55. Kao, J.H., Chen, P.J., Lai, M.Y., Chen, D.S., 2000. Efficacy of consensus interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 1418–1423. Kavanaugh, A., 2006. Anakinra (interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) has positive effects on function and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Adv. Ther. 23, 208–217. Keeffe, E.B., Hollinger, F.B., 1997. Therapy of hepatitis C: consensus interferon trials. Consensus Interferon Study Group. Hepatology 26, 101S–107S. Key, L.L., Rodriguiz, R.M., Willi, S.M., Wright, N.M., Hatcher, H.C., Eyre, D.R., Cure, J.K., Griffin, P.P., Ries, W.L., 1995. Long-term treatment of osteopetrosis with recombinant human interferon gamma. N. Engl. J. Med. 332, 1594–1599. Kim, E.K., Shim, T.S., Lee, J.Y., Oh, Y.M., Lim, C.M., Lee, S.D., Koh, Y., Kim, D.S., Kim, W.D., Kim, W.S., 2004. The adjuvant effect of subcutaneous interferon-gamma in the treatment of refractory multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 57, 226–233. Koh, W.J., Kwon, O.J., Suh, G.Y., Chung, M.P., Kim, H., Lee, N.Y., Kim, T.S., Lee, K.S., 2004. Six-month therapy with aerosolized interferon-gamma for refractory multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 19, 167–171. Kovacs, J.A., Vogel, S., Albert, J.M., Falloon, J., Davey, R.T., Walker, R.E., Polis, M.A., Spooner, K., Metcalf, J.A., Baseler, M., Fyfe, G., Lane, H.C., 1996. Controlled trial of interleukin-2 infusions in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 1350–1356. Kreitman, R.J., Wilson, W.H., White, J.D., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Jaffe, E.S., Giardina, S., Waldmann, T.A., Pastan, I., 2000. Phase I trial of recombinant immunotoxin anti-Tac (Fv)-PE38 (LMB-2) in patients with hematologic malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 18, 1622–1636. Ksontini, R., MacKay, S.L.D., Moldawer, L.L., 1998. Revisiting the role of tumor necrosis factor α and the response to surgical injury and inflammation. Arch. Surg. 133, 558–567. Leonard, W.J., 1999. In: Paul, W.E. (Ed.), Fundamental Immunology, fourth ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp. 741–774. Levi-Montalcini, R., Hamburger, V., 1953. A diffusible agent of mouse sarcoma producing hyperplasia of sympathetic ganglia and hyperneurotization of viscera in the chick embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 123, 233–288. Lindsay, K.L., Trepo, C., Heintges, T., Shiffman, M.L., Gordon, S.C., Hoefs, J.C., Schiff, E.R., Goodman, Z.D., Laughlin, M., Yao, R., Albrecht, J.K., Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group, 2001. A randomized, double-blind trial comparing pegylated interferon alfa-2b to interferon alfa-2b as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 34, 395–403. Loddick, S.A., Rothwell, N.J., 1996. Neuroprotective effects of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 16, 932–940.
12
V. Tayal, B.S. Kalra / European Journal of Pharmacology 579 (2008) 1–12
Maini, R.N., Taylor, P.C., 2000. Anti-cytokine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Annu. Rev. Med. 51, 207–229. Mao, X.Q., Kawai, M., Yamashita, T., Enomoto, T., Dake, Y., Sasaki, S., Kataoka, Y., Fukuzumi, T., Endo, K., Sano, H., Aoki, T., Kurimoto, F., Adra, C.N., Shirakawa, T., Hopkin, J.M., 2000. Imbalance production between interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in bronchial asthma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 276, 607–612. McHutchison, J.G., Gordon, S., Schiff, E.R., Shiffman, M.L., Lee, W.M., Rustgi, V.K., Goodman, Z.D., Ling, M.H., Cort, S., Albrecht, J.K., 1998. Interferon alfa-2b monotherapy versus interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C: results of a US multicenter randomized controlled study. N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 1485–1492. Melian, E.B., Plosker, G.L., 2001. Interferon alfacon-1—a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of Chronic hepatitis C. Drugs 61, 1661–1691. Minami, Y., Kono, T., Miyazaki, T., Taniguchi, T., 1993. The IL-2 receptor complex: its structure, function, and target genes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11, 245–267. Morris, J.C., Waldmann, T.A., 2000. Advances in interleukin 2 receptor targeted treatment. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 59, i109–i114. Neri, S., Pulvirenti, D., Bertino, G., 2006. Psychiatric symptoms induced by antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: comparison between interferonalpha-2a and interferon-alpha-2b. Clin. Drug Investig. 26, 655–662. Nuki, G., Bresnihan, B., Bear, M.B., McCabe, D., 2002. Long-term safety and maintenance of clinical improvement following treatment with anakinra (recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 46, 2838–2846. O'Dell, J.R., 1999. Anticytokine therapy—a new era in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis? N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 310–312. Onuffer, J.J., Horuk, R., 2002. Chemokines, chemokine receptors and small molecule antagonists: recent developments. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 23, 459–467. Opal, S.M., Fisher Jr., C.J., Dhainaut, J.F., Vincent, J.L., Brase, R., Lowry, S.F., Sadoff, J.C., Slotman, G.J., Levy, H., Balk, R.A., Shelly, M.P., Pribble, J.P., LaBrecque, J.F., Lookabaugh, J., Donovan, H., Dubin, H., Baughman, R., Norman, J., DeMaria, E., Matzel, K., Abraham, E., Seneff, M., 1997. Confirmatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter trial. The interleukin-1 receptor antagonist sepsis investigator group. Crit. Care Med. 25, 1115–1124. O'Shea, J.J., Visconti, R., Cheng, T.P., Gadina, M., 2000. Jaks and Stats as therapeutic targets. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 59, i115–i118. Pakdaman, H., Fallah, A., Sahraian, M.A., Pakdaman, R., Meysamie, A., 2006. Treatment of early onset multiple sclerosis with suboptimal dose of interferon Beta-1a. Neuropediatrics 37, 257–260. Pau, A.K., Tavel, J.A., 2002. Therapeutic use of interleukin-2 in HIV-infected patients. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2, 433–439. Podhajcer, O.L., Lopez, M.V., Mazzolini, G., 2007. Cytokine gene transfer for cancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 18, 183–194. Pol, S., Couzigon, P., Bourliere, M., Abergel, A., Combis, J.M., Larrey, D., Tran, A., Moussalli, J., Poupon, R., Berthelot, P., Bréchot, C., 1999. A randomized trial of ribavirin and interferon-alpha vs. interferon-alpha alone
in patients with chronic hepatitis C who were nonresponders to a previous treatment. J. Hepatol. 31, 1–7. Provenzano, R., Bhaduri, S., Singh, A.K., 2005. PROMPT Study Group. Extended epoetin alfa dosing as maintenance treatment for the anemia of chronic kidney disease: the PROMPT study. Clin. Nephrol. 64, 113–123. Ramirez, C.B., Marino, I.R., 2007. The role of basiliximab induction therapy in organ transplantation. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 7, 137–148. Romeril, K.R., Carter, J.M., Green, G.J., Beard, M.E., Heaton, D.C., Newhook, C.H., Gibbons, S.S., Reddy, J., 1989. Treatment of hairy cell leukaemia with recombinant alpha interferon. N.Z. Med. J. 102, 186–188. Saleh, M.N., LeMaistre, C.F., Kuzel, T.M., Foss, F., Platanias, L.C., Schwartz, G., Ratain, M., Rook, A., Freytes, C.O., Craig, F., Reuben, J., Sams, M.W., Nichols, J.C., 1998. Antitumor activity of DAB389-IL-2 fusion toxin in mycosis fungoides. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 39, 63–73. Schmidinger, M., Hejna, M., Zielinski, C.C., 2004. Aldesleukin in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 4, 957–980. Sen, G.C., Lengyel, P., 1992. The interferon system—a bird's eye view of its biochemistry. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5017–5020. Shalaby, M.R., Aggarwal, B.B., Rinderknecht, E., Svedersky, L.P., Finkle, B.S., Palladino Jr., M.A., 1985. Activation of human polymorphonuclear neutrophil functions by interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factors. J. Immunol. 135, 2069–2073. Sharma, P.K., Hota, D., Pandhi, P., 2004. Biologics in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Assoc. Phys. India 52, 231–236. Shepherd, J., Brodin, H., Cave, C., Waugh, N., Price, A., Gabbay, J., 2004. Pegylated interferon alpha-2a and -2b in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 8, 1–125. Singh, J., Suruchi, A., 2004. Anti TNF-α strategy: present status of this therapeutic paradigm. Indian J. Pharmacol. 36, 10–14. Skurkovich, S.V., Eremkina, E.I., 1975. The probable role of interferon in allergy. Ann. Allergy 35, 356–360. Skurkovich, S.V., Skurkovich, B., 1989. Development of autoimmune diseases is connected with the initial disturbance of IFN synthesis in the cells. J. IFN Res. 9 (Suppl. 2), S305. Skurkovich, S.V., Klinova, E.G., Eremkina, E.I., Levina, N.V., 1974. Immunosuppressive effect of an anti-interferon serum. Nature 247, 551–552. Thevenot, T., Regimbeau, C., Ratziu, V., Leroy, V., Opolon, P., Poynard, T., 1999. Meta-analysis of interferon randomized trials in the treatment of viral hepatitis C in naive patients: 1999 update. J. Viral Hepatitis 8, 48–62. Vilcek, J., Feldmann, M., 2004. Historical review: cytokines as therapeutics and targets of therapeutics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25, 201–209. Weinstock-Guttman, B., Jacobs, L.D., 2000. What is new in the treatment of multiple sclerosis? Drugs 59, 401–410. Yildirim, M., Inaloz, H.S., Baysal, V., Kesici, D., Candir, O., 2004. A case of condyloma acuminatum treated successfully with low-dose isotretinoin and interferon. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 58, 889–891. Zeuzem, S., Feinman, S.V., Rasenack, J., Heathcote, E.J., Lai, M.Y., Gane, E., O'Grady, J., Reichen, J., Diago, M., Lin, A., Hoffman, J., Brunda, M.J., 2000. Peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 1666–1672.