Journal Pre-proof Depositional model and sequence stratigraphy of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession in the Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt H.A. Wanas, A.M. Abu Shama, S.A. El-Nahrawy PII:
S1464-343X(19)30361-9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103706
Reference:
AES 103706
To appear in:
Journal of African Earth Sciences
Received Date: 7 August 2019 Revised Date:
31 October 2019
Accepted Date: 5 November 2019
Please cite this article as: Wanas, H.A., Abu Shama, A.M., El-Nahrawy, S.A., Depositional model and sequence stratigraphy of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession in the Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt, Journal of African Earth Sciences (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jafrearsci.2019.103706. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Depositional model and sequence stratigraphy of the Paleocene-
1
Lower Eocene succession in the Farafra Oasis, Western Desert,
2
Egypt
3 4
Wanas, H. A1,2. ; Abu Shama, A. M.3; El-Nahrawy, S. A.3
5 6
1
Department of Petroleum Geology and Sedimentology, Faculty of
7
Earth Science, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, E-
8
mail:
[email protected]
9
2
10
Geology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Menoufiya University,
Shebin El-Kom, Egypt, E-mail:
[email protected]
11
3
12
Geology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Kafrelsheikh University,
13
Egypt
14 Abstract
15
This work is to reconstruct a depositional model and establish a sequence
16
stratigraphic framework for the exposed Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession
17
in the Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. This has been performed by an
18
integration of the microfacies analysis with aid of the nannofossils and P/B
19
foraminiferal ratio in the studied rocks. The identified microfacies and their
20
related palaeoenvironments suggest a deposition in a carbonate shelf (inner,
21
middle and outer shelf) environment. The Paleocene deposits (Dakhla,
22
Tarawan and lower part of Esna formations) were laid down in a mid-to
23
outer-shelf setting, whereas the deposits of Early Eocene age (Farafra
24
Formation and upper part of Esna Formation) were deposited in an inner
25
shelf setting. An integration of the resultant microfacies, nannofossils and
26
P/B foramineferal ratio in the studied four stratigraphic sections led to record
27
five 3rd order depositional sequences (SQs) separated by six sequence
28
boundaries (SBs). Each sequence consists of transgressive (TST) and
29
1
highstand (HST) systems tracts. The TST consists of a retrogradational
30
package of facies (planktonic foraminiferal wackstones /packstones, as well
31
as shales and marls rich in planktonic foraminifera) ended by marine
32
flooding surface (MFS). The HST is made up of aggradational package of
33
facies (nummulitic bioclastic packstone, algal alveoline packstone, alveoline-
34
miliolid packstone and shale with a relatively low P/B foraminiferal ratio)
35
topped by sequence boundary (SB). The sequence boundaries are
36
distinguished by lithologic and paleontologic criteria. The recognized
37
lithologic criteria comprise calcretes, iron-stained surface, extensive
38
bioturbation and erosional irregular surfaces. The paleontologic criteria are
39
evidenced by the time gaps (hiatus). The maximum flooding surfaces (mfs)
40
are recognized where there are a relatively high P/B foraminiferal ratio in the
41
studied facies. The integrated results suggest that sedimentation regime of
42
the studied Paleocene-Lower Eocene rocks was mainly controlled by tectonic
43
activities and subsequent sea-level changes that were a result of a
44
reactivation of the Syrian Arc System during Early Paleogene time.
45 46
1.
Introduction
47
Paleocene-Eocene sequences of the entire world are significant
48
because they contain evidences of Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum,
49
PETM, (Zachos et al., 2001; Singh et al., 2016) that affected on the various
50
biotas (Aubry et al., 1998). Egypt has good outcrops of the Paleocene-
51
Eocene stratigraphic successions, Farafra Oasis, in particular (Said, 1990).
52
This led the authors to carry out detailed study of the Paleocene-Eocene
53
sequences in the Farafra Oasis, Western Desert of Egypt. The Paleocene-
54
2
Eocene outcrops in the Farafra Oasis attracted attention of many authors
55
who studied their general geology and litho- and bio-stratigraphy (e. g.,
56
Hewaidy, and Strougo, 2001; Obaidalla et al., 2006; Farouk, 2016, Abu
57
Shama et al., 2019; Farouk et al., 2019; Sherif et al., 2019). However, a few
58
studies have been done on the detailed analysis of the depositional
59
environments and sequence stratigraphy of the exposed Paleocene-Lower
60
Eocene rocks in the Farafra Oasis (Khalil and El-Younsy, 2003; Hewaidy et
61
al., 2006). Therefore, the main objectives of this study are to reconstruct a
62
depositional model and establish a sequence stratigraphic framework for the
63
Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession exposed at Farafra Oasis on the basis
64
of its microfacies, with the aid of its nannofossils and P/B foraminiferal
65
ratio.
66
2- Geological Setting
67
The Farafra Oasis occurs on the southern Neo-Tethyan shelf (Said,
68
1990). It is an oval-shaped depression in the central part of the Egyptian
69
Western Desert (Fig.1). The Farafra area is situated between longitudes 27°
70
20' and 28° 59' E and latitudes 26° 18' and 27° 42' N (Fig. 1). Studies of the
71
Upper Cretaceous-Eocene strata in the Farafra Oasis indicate that the
72
Farafra Oasis was subjected to three syndepositional tectonic events at
73
various stages before the end of the Cretaceous to the late middle Eocene
74
(Obaidalla et al., 2006). These syndepositional tectonic events were led to
75
the formation of unconformities and responsible for the variations in
76
thicknesses and facies of the Upper Cretaceous-Eocene strata. The Syrian
77
Arc Folding System (NE–SW direction) led to the structural highs and lows
78
in the Farafra Oasis (Omara et al., 1970). The Farafra Oasis represents the
79
3
southernmost extinction of the Syrian Arc System (Omara et al., 1970). The
80
eastern part of the depression is covered by the sand dunes. The western
81
scarp is represented by El Guss Abu Said syncline (Omara et al., 1970).
82
This synclinal structure is located between El Maqfi anticline in the east
83
and Ain Dalla anticline in the west.
84 85
3. Materials and Methods
86
Four well-exposed stratigraphic sections representing the Paleocene-
87
Lower Eocene rock units (Dakhla, Tarawan, Esna and Farafra formations)
88
have been described and measured at four localities ( North Gunna, South
89
Gunna, Ain Ramla-ElQuss Abu Said and Bir Karawin; Fig. 1). The exposed
90
strata are described in terms of their thicknesses, rock types, facies changes,
91
stacking patterns and paleontological criteria. Fifty thin sections of different
92
rock types (carbonates and clastic rocks) are prepared for petrographic
93
investigation under standard polarizing microscope (Olympus model TH4-
94
200) that connected to a digital camera (Olympus UC-30). Representative
95
uncovered thin sections have been stained by Alizarin red and potassium
96
ferro-cyanide to distinguish between non ferroan calcite, ferroan calcite and
97
ferroan dolomite as described by Dickson (1965). The limestone
98
microfacies are named following the classification of Dunham (1962).
99
Dolomite textures are described using the textural classification of Sibley
100
and Gregg (1987). The identified microfacies are compared with the
101
standard microfacies types (SMF) of Wilson (1975) and Flügel (2010). The
102
XRD patterns were identified using scheme of Moore and Reynold (1997).
103
The bulk samples of the clay fractions were examined by PANalytical X-
104
4
ray diffraction equipment (type X-pert pro) with Cu radiation, λ= 1.542 Å
105
at 50 KV 40 MA at the Egyptian mineral resources authority (central
106
laboratories sector). The diffraction charts are compared with ICDD
107
database. The clay fractions (˂ 2µm) were separated out from the sample
108
by centrifugation and were dried on glass slides at air temperature. The
109
glass slides were prepared as air-dried, wetted with ethylene glycol and
110
heated up to 550̊ c for 2 hours.
111 112
4. Litho- and Bio-stratigraphy
113
Lithostratigraphically, the studied Paleocene-Eocene succession comprises
114
four rock units that are from base to top: the Dakhla, Tarawan, Esna and
115
Farafra formations (Figs. 2-5). The Dakhla Formation is Early Paleocene
116
(Danian) in age, and is unconformably overlies the Khoman Formation. It is
117
composed mainly of greyish white, flaky, gypsiferous, nodular calcareous
118
shales that are intercalated with yellow marls and argillaceous limestone.
119
The Dakhla Formation attains its maximum thickness (16 m) at North
120
Gunna section, whereas its minimum thickness (6 m) is recorded at Ain
121
Ramla-ElQuss Abu Said section. The Tarawan Formation is Late Paleocene
122
(Early Thanetian) in age, and it unconformably overlies the Dakhla
123
Formation. It is a cliff-forming, and consists mainly of white massive
124
chalky limestone, graded upward to flaky marly limestone. The maximum
125
thickness of the Tarawan Formation reaches to 8.5 meters at Ain Ramla-
126
ElQuss Abu Said section. The Esna Formation is Late Paleocene-Early
127
Eocene (Late Thanetian- Ypresian) in age, and it unconformably overlies
128
the Tarawan Formation. It is mainly made up of grey, gypsefeous, fissile
129
5
shale that has limestones (dolomites?) at its uppermost part. The limestones
130
(dolomites?) display a concretionally-like beds in parts and in others occurs
131
as thin beds. The Esna Formation varies in thickness from 15.5 m to 40 m
132
(Figs. 2-5). The Farafra Formation is Early Eocene (Ypresian) in age, and it
133
conformably overlies the Esna Formation. It is composed of greyish white,
134
highly fossiliferous, massive limestone. The limestone is nodular in parts
135
and riches in Alveoline sp and Nummulite sp. The Farafra Formation is only
136
recorded at ElQuss Abu Said and Bir Karawin sections (15-20 m thick,
137
respectively), whereas at North Gunna and South Gunna sections, the
138
Farafra Formation is not observed, where there is grey stromatolitic
139
limestone unit (6-8 m thick).This stromatolitic limestone unit directly
140
overlies the Esna Formation (Figs. 2, 3). It is considered as fresh water
141
continental carbonates of post-Eocene age (Strougo, 1996; Wanas and
142
Armenteros, 2019).
143
Biostratigraphically, because of the minor hiatus throughout the
144
stratigraphic successions help in detecting the sequence boundaries (Sarg,
145
1988; Catuneanu, 2006), the authors followed the recently biostratigraphic
146
(nannofossils) study of Abu Shama et al. (2019) who detected minor hiatus
147
in the studied stratigraphic sections (Figs. 2-5). Abu Shama et al. (2019)
148
concluded that the Paleocene-Eocene succession in the Farafra Oasis
149
unconformably overlies the Maastrichtian Khoman Formation, where the
150
latest Maastrichtian Micula prinsii (CC 26b) subzone in the uppermost part
151
of the Khoman Formation is directly overlain by Paleocene calcareous
152
nannofossil Zone NP 4 that is recorded in the base of the Dakhla
153
Formation. They also recorded a minor hiatus at the Danian/Selandian
154
6
boundary, and traced it in the uppermost part of Zone NP 4 (near the top of
155
the Dakhla Formation) at North Gunna and South Gunna sections. Also,
156
they found a pronounced hiatus after the base of Selandian to the base of
157
the Thanetian (lower part of the Tarawam Formation) at North Gunna and
158
South Gunna sections. A hiatus between the Late Paleocene (Thanetian)
159
and the Early Eocene (Ypresian) is observed in the lower part of the Esna
160
Formation at North Gunna section.
161 162
5. Facies Analysis and Depositional Environments
163
Different microfacies of carbonate rocks are identified in the studied Paleocene-Lower
Eocene
succession
(Figs.
2-5).
The
164
recognized
165
microfacies and their related paleoenvironments are outlines and discusses
166
in the following:
167
5.1. Lime mudstone Microfacies
168
Two types of lime mudstone microfacies are recorded; planktonic
169
foraminiferal lime mudstone and dolomitic lime mudstone. The planktonic
170
foraminiferal lime mudstone (PfM) microfacies is recorded in the Tarawan
171
Formation at South Gunna (Fig. 3) and Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said (Fig.
172
4) with 0.5m in thickness. Rocks of this microfacies are greyish white,
173
massive limestones. Microscopically, the planktonic foraminiferal lime
174
mudstone microfacies (Plate 1A) is made up of planktonic foraminiferal
175
tests (5%) embedded in micrite (95%). The foraminiferal tests are filled
176
with pseudosparite and floating in the micritic groundmass. The dolomitic
177
lime mudstone microfacies (DM) occurs at the middle part of the Esna
178
Formation at Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said and Bir Karawin sections (Figs.
179
7
4, 5). Rocks of this microfacies are yellowish white limestones (30 - 50 cm
180
thick), and occur as concretions within the grey shale of the upper part of
181
the Esna Formation. In thin section, the dolomitic lime mudstone
182
microfacies (DM) is subdivided into dolomitic non-fossiliferous lime
183
mudstone and dolomitic fossiliferous lime mudstone. The dolomitic non-
184
fossiliferous lime mudstone microfacies is composed of micrite enclosing
185
fine- to medium-crystalline, euhedral to subhedral scattered ferroan
186
dolomite rhombs (Plate 1B). The dolomitic fossiliferous lime mudstone
187
microfacies occur near the upper part of the Esna Formation at Bir Karawin
188
and Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said sections. Rocks of this microfacies are
189
greyish white, nodular and attaining 0.5m thick. This microfacies is made
190
up of allochems (8%) embedded in micrite matrix. The allochems are
191
mainly represented by Nummulites sp (Plate 1C) and echinoid debris. The
192
micritic groundmass is partially replaced by fine-crystalline dolomite
193
rhombs.
194
Interpretation: Planktonic foraminiferal lime mudstone with low
195
planktonic forams (5%) is interpreted to indicate a deposition in middle,
196
proximal outer, shelf with very low energy conditions below storm wave
197
base (Wilson, 1975). The dominance of micrite groundmass also suggests a
198
low energy environment below storm wave base (Burchette and Wright,
199
1992). The dolomitic lime mudstone microfacies is interpreted to have been
200
deposited in low energy restricted tidal flat environment, inner shelf setting,
201
(equivalent to SMF23 and FZ8 of Wilson, 1975). Also, the occurrence of
202
fine-crystalline dolomite in the lime-mudstone suggests a subjection of the
203
8
lime mud to dolomitization process during an early diagenetic stage in a
204
peritidal environment, inner shelf setting, (Wanas, 2008).
205 206
5.2. Wackstone Microfacies
207
Wackstone microfacies is well distributed in the Dakhla, Tarawan and
208
Farafra formations. It has different types of skeletal components. Three
209
types of wackstones are identified on the basis of their skeletal components:
210
5.2.1. Nummulitic wackstone (NW)
211
The nummulitic wackstone is recognized in the limestone beds of the
212
upper part of the Esna Formation at El-Quss Abu Said section (Fig. 4). This
213
microfacies overlies the nummulitic operculine packstone microfacies and
214
underlies the dolomitized bioclastic nummulitc packstone microfacies.
215
Rocks of this microfacies attain a thickness ranges from 2 m to 2.5 m. They
216
are greyish white to grey in color, hard, fossiliferous and argillaceous in
217
some parts. In thin section, this microfacies consists of framework grains
218
(20%-40%) embedded in micrite groundmass (60%-80%). The framework
219
grains include tests of Nummulite sp. (15%), Operculina sp. (5%), Assilina
220
sp. (5%) and Discocylina sp. (3%) in addition to pelecypod, echinoid and
221
bryozoan shell fragments (5-7%) (Plate 1.D, E, F). The nummulite tests are
222
larger in size (Plate 1D). The bryozoan shells exhibit cellular structure with
223
voids filled with sparry calcite (Plate 1E). The micritic groundmass has
224
scattered fine-crystalline dolomite rhombs.
225
Interpretation: The association of Nummulite sp. with other large benthic
226
foraminfera (Operculina sp., Assilina sp. and Discocylina sp.) can refer to
227
banks or reefal flat environment (Aigner, 1983; Geel, 2000). It also
228
9
indicates a deposition in an inner ramp environment (Beavington-Penney
229
and Racey, 2004; Adabi et al., 2008; Sallam et al., 2015). The occurrence of
230
gypsum veins suggests evaporative phase under an arid climatic condition
231
during their development (Srivastava et al., 2019).
232 233
5.2.2. Planktonic foraminiferal wackstone (PfW)
234
This microfacies is widely recorded in the limestones of the Dakhla and
235
Tarawan formations at North Gunna, South Gunna and Ain Ramla-El-Quss
236
Abu Said sections (Figs. 2, 3, 4). In the Dakhla Formation, rocks of this
237
microfacies occur within the calcareous shales. At the Tarawan Formation,
238
rocks of this microfacies are white, yellowish white, massive and nodular
239
limestone (0.5m to 2m thick.). Petrographically, this microfacies is made up
240
of planktonic foraminifera (35-40%), echinoid and pelecypod shell debris
241
(1-5%) embedded in micrite (60-65%) (Plate 2A). The planktonic forams
242
are filled with sparry calcite.
243
Interpretation: Planktonic foraminiferal wackstone with high planktonic
244
forams (35-40%) indicates an open deep marine environment with low
245
energy conditions (Flügel, 2010). It is also equivalent to SMF3 and FZ3 of
246
the distal outer shelf that took place below storm wave base (Wilson, 1975;
247
Flügel, 2010; Geel, 2000).
248
5.2.3. Bioclastic wackstone (BW)
249
This microfacies is well encountered in the Farafra Formation at Ain
250
Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said and Bir Karawin sections (Figs. 4, 5). Rocks of
251
this microfacies are marly limestone, white to yellowish white in color,
252
massive,
253
hard,
fossiliferous
10
and
argillaceous
in
some
parts.
Microscopically, this microfacies contains recrystallized pelecypod shell
254
fragments (10-20%) floated in 80% micritic groundmass (Plate 2C).
255
Interpretation: The presence of large-sized pelecypod shell fragments
256
indicates an inner shelf environment of well-oxygenated open marine
257
environment (Kulm et al., 1975; Harris et al., 1997). The bioclastic
258
wackstone microfacies are also equivalent to SMF9 and FZ7 of the open
259
lagoons, inner shelf setting, (Wilson, 1975; Flügel, 2010).
260 261
5.3. Packstones Microfacies
262
The packstone is the widely distributed microfacies in the studied
263
formations (Figs. 2-5). It is recorded in the Dakhla, Tarawan and Farafra
264
formations. According to their skeletal components, the packstone
265
microfacies are classified to:
266
5.3.1. Alveoline miliolid packstone (AmP)
267
The alveoline miliolid packstone microfacies occurs in the upper part of
268
the Farafra Formation at El-Quss Abu Said section (Fig. 4). This
269
microfacies overlies the bioclastic wackstone microfacies and underlies the
270
algal alveoline packstone microfacies. Rocks of this microfacies are
271
bedded, hard and yellowish white in colour, attaining about 1m thick. In
272
thin section, this microfacies consists of 20% miliolid tests (Triloculina sp.,
273
Quienqueloculina sp. and Spiroloculina sp.), Alveolina sp. (15%), small
274
uniserial and biserial benthic foraminifera (1-5%), calcareous algae (5%)
275
and few pelecypod shell debris that are embedded in micrite matrix (Plate 2
276
B, D, E).
277
11
Interpretation: The presence of alveoline tests indicates very shallow
278
marine environment in an inner shelf setting (Reichel, 1964). The
279
dominance of miliolids and other small benthic foraminifera may reflect a
280
restricted shallow subtidal quiet water conditions probably lagoon in an
281
inner shelf setting (Hottinger, 1997; Sallam et al., 2015).
282
5.3.2. Algal alveoline packstone (AVP)
283
The algal alveoline packstone is recorded in the upper part of the Farafra
284
Formation at El-Quss Abu Said section (Fig. 4). This microfacies underlies
285
by alveoline miliolid packstone. The rocks of this microfacies are 2 m in
286
thickness, and are yellowish white in color. They are nodular limestone
287
fossiliferous with Lucina sp. Petrographically, it is composed of skeletal
288
carbonates (75%) embedded in micrite matrix (25%). The skeletal
289
carbonates include tests of Alveolina sp. (25%), calcareous algae (25%)
290
(Plate 2E), pelecypod shell fragments (15%) and echinod plates (5%).
291
Miliolid tests and shell fragments of ostracod and gastropod are also
292
observed (5%). The molluscan shell fragments are filled with large crystals
293
of sparry calcite. The echinoderm plates are surrounded by very thin layer
294
of syntaxial calcite overgrowth.
295
Interpretation: The occurrence of large benthic foraminifera (Alveolina
296
sp.) with calcareous algae indicates an intertidal distal back shoal (lagoon
297
with open circulation) at shallow inner shelf setting (Flügel, 2010). This
298
type of facies was interpreted to reflect a deposition in open lagoons that
299
refer to SMF18, FZ7 of Wilson (1975). The algal alveoline packstone
300
microfacies can be considered to reflect a deposition in an inner ramp
301
setting (Khalil and El-Younsy, 2003; Sallam et al., 2015).
302
12
5.3.3. Planktonic foraminiferal packstone (PfP)
303
Planktonic foraminiferal packstone microfacies is recorded in the middle
304
and upper parts of the Tarawan Formation and in the middle part of the
305
Dakhla Formation at North Gunna and south Gunna sections (Figs. 2, 3).
306
Rocks of this microfacies are massive chalky limestone and nodular
307
argillaceous limestone of yellowish brown to white in color. Their thickness
308
ranges from 2.5 m to 3.5 m. It is overlain and underlain by planktonic
309
foraminiferal wackstone microfacies. Petrographically, this microfacies is
310
made up of planktonic foraminiferal tests (75-90%) embedded in micrite
311
(10-25%). The dominant planktonic species are Globigerina, Morzovella,
312
Acarinina and Globigerinoids tests (55-60%) with chambers filled with
313
non-ferroan sparry calcite except at the upper parts of the Tarawan
314
Formation, it is ferroan type (Plate 2F). Calcareous warm tubes and
315
echinoderm spines (2-5%) are also recorded.
316
Interpretation: This type of microfacies reflects a deposition in an outer
317
shelf with low energy conditions below normal wave base (Wilson, 1975;
318
Harris et al., 1997). It also reflects a deposition in open circulated, high
319
oxygenated marine waters (Wilson, 1975; Flügel, 2010).
320
5.3.4. Nummilitic operculine packstone (NOP)
321
The nummulitic operculine packstone microfacies occur in the upper part
322
of the Esna Formation and the lower part of the Farafra Formation at El-
323
Quss Abu Said section (Fig. 4). It is overlain by nummulitic wackstone
324
microfacies and underlain by shale lithofacies (Fig. 4). Rocks of this
325
microfacies are yellowish white in color, and attain 1m thick. They are
326
argillaceous
327
and
intercalated
13
with
thin
layers
of
grey
shale.
Petrographically, the main skeletal components are tests of Operculina sp.
328
(30%), small- sized Nummulite sp. (10-15%), Discocylina and Assilina
329
species (5%) (Plate 3.A, B). It also contains pelecypod, bryozoan and
330
echinod shell fragments (10%). These allochems are embedded in 30%
331
micrite matrix containing microsparry calcite patches and scattered
332
dolomite rhombs.
333
Interpretation: The occurrence of Nummulite sp. indicates warm shallow
334
water or shallow neritic zone (Arni, 1965; Blondeau, 1972). The association
335
of Nummulite sp., Operculina sp. and Discocylina sp. indicates a bank
336
setting (Arni, 1965; Arni and Lanterno, 1972; Khalifa and Zaghloul, 1990).
337
This microfacies can be compared with SMF4 and FZ4 of Wilson (1975)
338
and Flügel (2010) which refers to a deposition in a fore slope area. It also
339
reflects a deposition in an inner ramp setting (Sallam et al., 2015).
340
5.3.5. Dolomitized nummulitic bioclastic packstone (DNP)
341
This microfacies occurs in the uppermost part of the Esna Formation at
342
El-Quss Abu Said (Fig. 4). The rocks of this microfacies occur as interbeds
343
within shale and mudrocks lithofacies. Petrographically, this microfacies
344
(Plate 3.C) contains nummulite tests (10-20%) and shell fragments of
345
pelecypod (15%), echinod (5-10%), gastropod (5-10 %), ostracod (1-2%)
346
and bryozoan (1-2%). Its matrix is micrite containing fine-crystalline
347
dolomite rhombs.
348
Interpretation: The presence of large nummilite tests with pelecypod and
349
echinoid shell fragments represents a back bank facies on an inner shelf
350
setting (Pomar, 2001; C´osovic´ et al., 2004). This type of facies is similar
351
to SMF10 and FZ7 of Wilson (1975) and Flügel (2010). The association of
352
14
nummulite debris with micritic matrix indicates extensive transportation
353
and reworking from high to low energy conditions (Dunham, 1962).
354 355
5.4. Dolomicrite (D)
356
The dolomicrite microfacies is recorded in the upper part of the Esna
357
Formation at El-Quss Abu Said and Bir Karawin sections (Figs. 4, 5). It
358
occurs as thin interbeds within shale/mudrocks lithofacies. The rocks of this
359
microfacies are yellow to yellowish white in color and attain thickness
360
ranges from 30 cm to 1m. In some parts, the rocks of this microfacies occur
361
as concretions. Microscopically, this microfacies consists of fine-crystalline
362
unzoned dolomite rhombs with anhedral, xenotopic, non-planar habit (Plate
363
3D).
364
Interpretation: Dolomicrite reflects dolomitization in an early diagenetic
365
stage in a peritidal environment of an inner shelf setting (Tucker and
366
Wright, 1990; Wanas, 2008).
367 368
5.5. Calcareous Quartz Arenite
369
This microfacies is recorded in the caliche bed (1m thick) that lies at the
370
contact between the Esna Formation and the overlying stromatolitic
371
limestone unit in the North and South Gunna sections (Figs. 2, 3). Rocks of
372
this microfacies are white in color. Petrographically, this microfacies
373
consists of monocrystalline quartz grains floating in poiklotopic calcite
374
cement (Plate 3E). The margins of quartz grains are corroded and partially
375
replaced by calcite cement. This can be described as corona texture (Plate
376
3E).
377
15
Interpretation: Quartz grains with corona texture and sparry calcite cement
378
in this calcareous quartz arenite are similar to non-pedoegenic calcretes that
379
form during a deposition of continental carbonates (Alonso-Zarza, 2003;
380
Wanas and Soliman, 2014).
381 382
5.6. Recrystallized Limestone
383
This mirofacies forms the stromatolitic limestone unit that overlies the
384
Esna Formation at North and South Gunna sections (Figs. 2, 3). The rocks
385
of this microfacies range in thickness from 4m to 8m at South Gunna and
386
North Gunna respectively. They show regular banding of light and dark
387
colors (stromatolitic-like structure). Microscopically, this microfacies is
388
composed of radiaxial fibrous calcite with dark micrite substrate (Plate 3F).
389
Silicification in some parts was observed.
390
Interpretation: This type of microfacies is similar to FZ10 of Wilson
391
(1975) and microfacies of Wanas and Armenteros (2019) that indicate
392
meteorically-induced continental carbonates. The regular light and dark
393
lamina may reflect repeated variations in aqueous geochemical conditions
394
within the depositional system (Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003).
395 396
5.7. Shale/Mudrocks Lithofacies
397
Because of their difficulty to study under the polarized microscope, the
398
encountered shales/mudrocks are investigated by using X-ray diffraction
399
analysis (XRD).
Smectite and kaolinite are the most abundant clay
400
minerals detected in the studied shale and mudrock samples (Table 1, Fig.
401
6). Also, the distribution of P/B foraminiferal ratio in shale/mudrock
402
16
lithofacies (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5), showed that most of shale have a relatively
403
high (≥ 40%) to medorate (20-35%) P/B forminiferal ratio, whereas a few
404
of them have a relatively low (5%) P/B foraminiferal ratio.
405
Interpretation: Changes of clay minerals are mainly in a response with
406
climatic changes (Singer, 1984). The kaolinite could be a result of a
407
chemical weathering of feldspars in a more humid period and acidic water
408
(Singer, 1984). The smectite is the weathering products of mafic silicates in
409
an arid to semi-arid climate and alkaline water (Singer, 1984). Therefore,
410
changes in climatic conditions from humid to arid may reflect sea-level
411
fluctuations, from sea-level rise to sea-level fall, respectively. This is in an
412
agreement with the opinion of Millot (1970). The shale with high P/B
413
foraminiferal ratio (≥40%) indicates a deposition in a deep marine water (a
414
distal outer shelf environment), whereas shale with a relatively moderate
415
P/B foraminiferal ratio (20-35%) suggests a deposition in a relatively
416
shallower marine water (a middle, proximal outer, shelf environment) (Van
417
Der Zwaan et al., 1990). On the other hand, the shale with a relatively low
418
P/B foraminiferal ratio (1-5%) can reflect relatively very shallower marine
419
water- deposits in an inner shelf setting (Van Der Zwaan et al., 1990).
420 421
6. Depositional Model
422
The above interpreted microfacies (section 5) allow us to recognize an
423
occurrence of three main facies associations that are assignable to shelf
424
environments (inner, middle and upper shelf; Fig. 7). The inner shelf facies
425
association includes dolomicrite (tidal flat), alveoline miliolid packstone
426
(inner lagoon), algal alveoline packstone/bioclastic wackstone (outer
427
17
lagoon),
dolomitized
nummulitic
bioclastic
packstone
(back-reef),
428
nummulitic wackstone (reef patches), nummulitic operculine packstone
429
(fore reef) and shales with a relatively low P/B forminiferal ratio. The
430
middle, proximal outer, shelf facies association is represented by shales
431
with a relatively moderate P/B foraminiferal ratio. Outer shelf facies
432
association comprises the planktonic foraminifera-rich shales, packstone,
433
wackstone and lime mudstone.
434
In the studied rock units, the basal parts of Dakhla, Tarawan and Esna
435
formations are mainly dominated by foraminiferal-rich lime mudstone,
436
wackstone and shale with high P/B ratio. These criteria may point out a
437
deep subtidal shelf (outer shelf). On the other hand, the upper parts of the
438
Dakhla and Tarawan formations are dominated by shales, marls and
439
limestones that have a relatively moderate P/B ratio that indicates a
440
deposition in middle, proximal outer, shelf environment. This middle shelf
441
environment is also recoded in the middle part of the Esna Formation that
442
consists of marl and calcareous shale with moderate P/B foraminiferal ratio
443
(~ 30%). The characterization of the upper part of the Esna Formation by
444
shale with a relatively low P/B foraminiferal ratio (5-10%) %) and pertidal
445
dolomicrite interbeds suggests a deposition in a shallow shelf (an inner
446
shelf). The Farfara Formation is generally represented by packstones enrich
447
with tests of alveolines, nummulites, miliolids and algae and echinoderm
448
fragments. These packstone types reflect a deposition in warm shallow
449
marine environments (lagoon, back reef, fore reef, bank) that characterize
450
to the inner shelf setting. In conclusions, the studied deposits of the
451
Paleocene age (Dakhla, Tarawan and lower part of Esna formations) were
452
18
laid down in a mid-to outer-shelf setting, whereas the deposits of Early
453
Eocene age (Farafra and upper part of Esna formations) were deposited in
454
an inner shelf setting. This could be in an agreement with those deduced by
455
the previously benthonic-planktonic foraminiferal studies in the Paleocene-
456
Lower Eocene successions of Egypt (Farouk, 2016 and references therein).
457
7. Depositional Sequences and Sequence Boundaries
458
According to the principles of sequence stratigraphy of siliciclastic
459
(Catuneanu, 2006) and carbonate (Sarg, 1988) rocks, the vertical and lateral
460
facies of the studied formations allow us to recognize five 3rd order
461
depositional sequences (SQ 1, SQ 2, SQ 3, SQ 4 and SQ 5) which exhibit
462
transgressive and regressive packages of facies (systems tracts). These
463
sequences are bounded by six sequence boundaries (SB 1, SB 2, SB 3, SB
464
4, SB 5 and SB 6). In the present study, the age constrains of the identified
465
sequences depends on their fossil contents and previously published
466
paleontological studies. In the studied successions, the lowstand systems
467
tracts are absent. The sequence boundaries are delineated by lithologic
468
criteria with the aid of the paleontological (nannofossils) ones of Abu
469
Shama et al. (2019). The maximum flooding surfaces (mfs) were recorded
470
where there are high planktonic foraminifera in the identified facies. The
471
identified sequences and their boundaries will be described and discussed in
472
the following paragraphs:
473
7.1. Sequence Boundaries
474
7.1.1. The first sequence boundary (SB 1)
475
This boundary is delineated at the base of the Paleocene succession. The
476
SB 1 is only traced at North Gunna section (Fig. 2). This surface separates
477
19
the uppermost part of the Khoman Formation (Maastrichtian) from the
478
lowermost part of the Paleocene Dakhla Formation. Lithologically, it is
479
marked by abrupt facies changes from chalk of the Khoman Formation to
480
the calcareous shale of the Dakhla Formation. Also, the SB 1 is also
481
indicated by the occurrence of irregular iron-stained surface and gypsum
482
layer (30cm thick) (Plate 4A) at the uppermost part of the Khoman
483
Formation. Paleontologically, this boundary (SB1) is recognized by missing
484
of NP 1, NP 2 and NP 3 calcareous nannofossil zones of Early Paleocene
485
whereas NP 4 Zone of the Late Danian is overlying the Late Cretaceous CC
486
26b subzone (Fig. 2). The recognized SB 1 could be equivalent to the K/Pg
487
boundary in Egypt (El-Azabi and Farouk, 2011; Farouk, 2016), and that
488
was recorded in other countries of the Middle East (Farouk et al., 2014;
489
Alhejoj et al., 2020). Globally, this sequence boundary (SB1) may be
490
equivalent to the global sea level fall recorded between the Late
491
Maastrichtian and Early Paleocene time (Haq et al., 1988; Hardenbol et al.,
492
1998). This SB1 could be related to the syn-sedimentary tectonic event of
493
the Syrian Arc System that started at Santonian time and continued to the
494
Miocene (Moustafa et al., 2003).
495
7.1.2. The second sequence boundary (SB 2)
496
The second sequence boundary lies in the uppermost part of the Dakhla
497
Formation, and directly at the base of the Tarawan Formation. SB 2 is
498
recorded at North Gunna (Fig. 2), South Gunna (Fig. 3) and its correlative
499
conformity at Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said section (Fig. 4). The lithologic
500
evidences for this sequence boundary (SB2) are irregular surface and iron
501
oxide layer (3cm thick) separating the Danian/Selandian strata (Plate 4B).
502
20
This layer is similar to the organic rich pinkish layer which is recorded by
503
Sprong et al. (2009) and Soliman and Obaidalla (2010) at the
504
Danian/Selandian boundary at Gebel Qreiya section, Nile Valley, Egypt.
505
Also, this boundary (SB2) is also noticed by the occurrence of thin layer of
506
brown-colored chert pebbles at the base of the Tarwan limestone in North
507
Gunna section. By using the zonation of calcareous nannofossil, the SB 2 is
508
recorded where there is a missing of the last part of Danian (hiatus) (Fig. 2,
509
3, 4, 5). This hiatus coincides with hiatus recorded in the Danian/Selandian
510
successions in the entire Western Desert of Egypt by biostratigraphers
511
(Farouk, 2016 and references therein). This hiatus could be in response with
512
the weak tectonic event that was related to deformation of the Syrian Arc
513
System in the Western Desert (Moustafa et al., 2003). Also, this hiatus is in
514
consistence with the global drop in relative sea-level during the Late
515
Danian (Haq et al., 1988).
516
7.1.3. The third sequence boundary (SB 3)
517
This sequence boundary (SB 3) occurs in the lowermost part Tarawan
518
Formation between the Selandian/Thanetian strata at North Gunna and
519
south Gunna (Figs. 2, 3). Lithologically, this boundary is evidenced by the
520
occurrence of extensive bioturbation forming Thalassinoides (Plate 4C).
521
According to calcareous nannofossil zonation, this boundary is marked by
522
missing part of Thanetian (NP 6 Zone) at South Gunna section as NP 5 is
523
overlain by NP 7/8. At North Gunna section, SB 3 is marked where there is
524
a missing of the latest part of Selandian and the lowest part of Thanetian
525
due to missing of NP 5 and NP 6 zones. The correlative conformity of the
526
studied SB 3 seems to be developed locally in Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu
527
21
Said section as the NP 6 Zone is recorded and underlying by NP 5 Zone.
528
The correlative conformity of SB 3 at Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said section
529
indicates submergence of this locality relative to the other localities (North
530
and South Gunna sections) that were in an emergence. This emergence may
531
be due to tectonic uplift and subsequent sea level falling. This boundary is
532
similar to that recorded by many authors in the Western Desert of Egypt
533
(e.g. El-Azabi and El-Arabi, 2000; El-Azabi and Farouk, 2011; Hewaidy et
534
al., 2006; Farouk, 2016). This boundary may confirm tectonic velasconsis
535
event of Strougo (1996).
536
7.1.4. The fourth sequence boundary (SB 4)
537
This boundary occurs at the base of Eocene succession at North Gunna
538
section (Fig. 2). It occurred within the Esna Formation and separates the
539
latest Thanetian part from the base of Ypresian. Lithologically, the SB 4 is
540
recognized by the occurrence of a gypsiferous shale layer (Plate 4D).
541
Paleontologically, this sequence bounadry is indicated by missing NP 9b
542
calcareous nannofossil subzone of Early Eocene. This boundary can be
543
correlated with that recorded in the Esna Formation by Dupuis et al. (2003),
544
Hewaidy et al. (2006), Obaidalla et al. (2008), El-Azabi and Farouk (2011)
545
and King (2013) at Dababiya Quarry Member, Farafra Oasis, Naqb Assuit
546
and Kharga Oasis, respectively. El-Azabi and Farouk (2011) mark this
547
boundary by reworked pebbles, red coloration and irregular surface.
548
Obaidalla et al. (2008) mark this boundary by an irregular surface, pebbles
549
and bioturbated sands, which indicate the occurrence of short hiatus.
550
Dupuis et al. (2003) and King (2013) distinguished this boundary by an
551
incised erosional surface which indicate eustatic sea level fall in the
552
22
Dababiya Quarry Member. Globally, this boundary may coincide with the
553
Paleocene/Eocene transition that known as the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal
554
Maximum.
555
7.1.5. The fifth sequence boundary (SB 5)
556
This sequence boundary is only recognized within the Esna Formation at
557
El-Quss Abu Said (Fig. 4) and Bir Karawin (Fig. 5) sections. SB 5 is
558
delineated at the basal part of the Early Ypresian. Lithologically, SB5 is
559
recorded within the upper part of the Esna Formation by the presence of
560
dolomicrite that can be represented discontinuity surface if there is lack in
561
subaerial exposure (Wanas, 2008). A similar sequence boundary was
562
described by Hewaidy et al. (2006) within the Esna Formation at the
563
northern slope of El-Quss Abu Said section.
564
7.1.6. The sixth sequence boundary (SB 6)
565
This boundary is recognized at the uppermost part of the Esna Formation
566
at North Gunna and South Gunna sections. Lithologically, this sequence
567
boundary is easily recognized by a caliche bed (Plate 4E) (1m to 10cm
568
thick) with red coloration at the uppermost part of the Esna Formation.
569
Also, this boundary is delineated by the abrupt facies change from the Esna
570
Shale below and the stromatolitic limestone above. Moreover, this
571
boundary is traced through the undulatory irregular erosional surface
572
separating the Esna Formation from stromatolitic limestone unit (Plate 4F).
573
The correlative conformity of this boundary occurs at Ain Ramla-El-Quss
574
Abu Said and Bir Karawin sections (Figs. 4, 5). This correlative conformity
575
lies between the Esna Formation and the Farafra Formation.
576 577
23
7.2. Depositional Sequences
578
The vertical and lateral facies change of the studied formations and their
579
time duration reflects the recognition of five 3rd order depositional
580
sequences that are subdivided into system tracts as the following:
581 582
7.2.1. The first depositional sequence (SQ 1)
583
The first depositional sequence (SQ1) in the studied stratigraphic
584
successions comprises the Late Danian part of the Dakhla Formation where
585
the Ellipsolithus macellus (NP 4) Zone occurs. SQ1 is marked at its base by
586
Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary which corresponds with the missing of the
587
Early Danian sequence (NP 1, NP 2 and NP 3 zones). The first depositional
588
sequence (SQ 1) is ended by SB2 that is marked by iron oxide layer (3 cm
589
thick) in the upper part of the Dakhla Formation. SQ1 has a thickness
590
approximately 15m at both North Gunna and South Gunna sections (Figs.
591
2, 3). The duration of SQ 1 was between 62.2 and 59.9m.y.
592
Generally, this sequence begins with retrogradational package of facies
593
(TST) that comprises outer shelf shales, marls and wackestones rich in
594
planktonic foraminifera. This passes upward to aggraditional facies (HST)
595
that are represented by mid-to inner-shelf shales with relatively moderate to
596
low planktonic forams (Figs. 2, 3). TST is marked at its base by SB1 which
597
also considered as transgressive surface (TS). It is topped by maximum
598
flooding surface (MFS) (Figs. 2, 3). The MFS is recorded in the middle part
599
of Dakhla Formation at North Gunna and South Gunna sections (Figs. 2, 3).
600
The MFS is placed at 8m from the base of the Dakhla Formation. It is
601
marked where there is a very high percentage of planktonic foraminifera.
602
24
7.3.2. The second depositional sequence (SQ 2)
603
The second depositional sequence (SQ2) in the studied sections comprises
604
the uppermost part of the Dakhla Formation and the lowermost part of the
605
Tarawan Formation (Figs. 2, 3, 4). SQ 2 is recorded at North Gunna, South
606
Gunna and Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said sections. It includes the Selandian
607
NP 5 Zone. The duration of this sequence reaches about 1.5-2 my. At North
608
Gunna section, the SQ 2 is bounded by SB 2 and SB 3. At this locality, it
609
has 2.5m thick and is composed of aggradational package of facies (HST)
610
that include mid-shelf bioclastic foramineferal wackestones. At South
611
Gunna and Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said sections, this depositional
612
sequence (SQ 2) is bounded by SB 2 and SB 3. It reaches about 12m in
613
thickness and starts with a retrogradational package of facies (TST) that are
614
represented by outer shelf planktonic foraminiferal packstone. This TST
615
grades upward to aggradational to prograditional package of facies (HST)
616
that consists mainly of middle shelf bioclastic foraminiferal wackstone and
617
mudstone.
618
7.3.3. The third depositional sequence (SQ 3)
619
This depositional sequence covers the Thanetian deposits that comprise the
620
upper part of the Tarawan Formation and the lower part of the Esna
621
Formation at North Gunna section (Fig. 2). It contains Heliolithus kleinpelii
622
(NP 6), Discoaster mohleri (NP 7/8) and Discoaster multiradiatus (NP 9a)
623
zones. The duration of this sequence ranges from 3.7 to 2.5 my. This SQ 3
624
is defined at its base by SB 3 which described in the previous sequence and
625
ended by subaerial exposure and regional unconformity which corresponds
626
with Paleocene-Eocene boundary that is also considered as a transgressive
627
25
surface (TS). At North Gunna (Fig. 2), the top of this sequence is
628
gypsiferous and characterizes by the missing of the latest Eocene NP 9b
629
subzone. The stacking pattern of SQ 3 starts with retrogradational facies
630
(TST, 2m to 6m thick) of middle shelf foraminiferal packstones to deep
631
outer shelf foraminiferal wackstones. The uppermost of this TST is
632
characterized by well-preserved planktonic foraminifera with high
633
abundance of P/B foraminiferal ratio (80-90%) that refers to the maximum
634
flooding surface (MFS). This TST graded upward to HST that consists of
635
moderate planktonic- shale of mid-shelf deposition. This shale forms the
636
lower part of the Esna Formation. A similar progradational facies (HST) are
637
recorded at latest Thanetian time in Garra Formation at Gabal Um El-
638
Ghanayim and Naqb Assuit with 10-20 m thick (El-Azabi and Farouk,
639
2011). At South Gunna and Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said sections (Figs. 3,
640
4), the depositional sequence (SQ 3) is bounded by SB 2 and SB 3. Its
641
thickness ranges from 3 m to 15 m at Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said section
642
and South Gunna section, respectively (Figs. 3, 4). At these localities, the
643
SQ 3 consists only of a retrogradational package of facies (TST) that is
644
represented by outer shelf planktonic foraminiferal wackestone/packstone.
645
7.3.4. The fourth depositional sequence (SQ 4)
646
This sequence (SQ4) is recorded in the Early Ypresian (middle and upper
647
parts of the Esna Formation) at all the studied sections (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5), and
648
attains a thickness ranges from15 to 35 m. It contains the Early Ypresian
649
NP 10a subzone. At North Gunna section, the gap between Paleocene and
650
Eocene is estimated of about 0.5my. At this section, SQ4 is marked at its
651
base by ferruginous and gypsiferous contact which marks the Paleocene-
652
26
Eocene boundary. In the other sections the basal contact of this sequence is
653
not recognized because they are composite. At the Paleocene-Eocene
654
boundary, an abrupt disappearance of planktonic foraminifera is recorded
655
(Fig. 2). At Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said and Bir Karawin, the top of SQ 4
656
is characterized by dolomitized nodular marl (dolomicrite) that represents
657
the SB 5. While at the North Gunna and South Gunna sections, the SQ 4
658
ended by undulatory surface and caliche layer (SB 6) separating it from the
659
overlying post-Eocene stromatolitic limestone unit (SB 6). At all the
660
studied sections, the SQ 4 is made up of alternating retrogradational facies
661
(TST) and aggredational facies (HST) that may be a fluctuation of sea-level
662
during Early Ypresian in the areas of study. The TST is composed of
663
middle, proximal outer shelf pelagic shales and wackstone with moderate
664
planktonic foraminifera. The HST is characterized by inner-shelf shales
665
with low planktonic foraminifera and lower intertidal dolomitic lime
666
mudstone of shallow inner shelf deposits. This indicates relative shallowing
667
in the sea-level.
668
7.3.5. The fifth depositional sequence (SQ 5)
669
This depositional sequence occupies the uppermost part of the Esna
670
Formation and the Farafra Formation. It is only recorded at Bir Karawin
671
and El-Quss Abu Said sections. SQ 5 has a thickness ranging from 13 m to
672
40 m at Bir Karawin and Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said, respectively. This
673
sequence (SQ 5) comprises TST and HST. The TST consists of low
674
planktonic-shale,
and
675
bioclastic wackstone that characterize the mid- to deep inner- shelf
676
environments. The HST is characterized by shallow inner shelf facies
677
alveoline
wackstone,
27
nummulitic
wackstone
(nummulitic bioclastic packstone, algal alveoline packstone and alveoline-
678
miliolid packstone) enriched by large benthonic foraminifera and barren in
679
planktonic foraminifera (Figs. 4, 5).
680 681
8. Sedimentation Regime and Tectonic/Sea level Characterization
682
Integrated study of field observation, facies analysis, sequence stratigraphy
683
and biostratigraphic (nannofossils) permitted us to recognize an occurrence
684
of tectonic pulses and subsequent sea level changes during deposition of the
685
studied Paleocene-Lower Eocene rocks. These tectonic pulses are
686
distinguished by: 1) the presence of hiatuses (as recorded by nannofossils
687
distribution) within the studied successions (Figs. 2, 3, 4 ); 2) thickness and
688
facies variations of the studied rock units from one locality to others in the
689
study area (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5); 3) unconformity surfaces at the contacts
690
between the studied rock units (Figs. 2, 3, 4); 4) changes of the depositional
691
setting from one rock unit to another superimposed unit, such as a transition
692
from outer shelf Dakhla, Tarwan and Esna formations to inner shelf (shoal-
693
lagoonal- peritidal) Esna and Farafra formations through mid-shelf Esna
694
Formation (Fig. 7); 5) absence of the Farafra Formation in North and South
695
Gunna successions, where the Upper Paleocene-Lower Eocene Esna
696
Formation is directly overlain by Post-Eocene continental carbonates (Figs.
697
2, 3), and 6) Recording the Selandian/Thanetian hiatus in the North Gunna
698
and south Gunna successions, and its absence in the Ain Ramla-El-Quss
699
Abu Said succession. This may indicate a low land at Ain Ramla-El-Quss
700
Abu Said locality relative to the other localities (North and South Gunna)
701
28
where high lands were prevailed. This may be due to tectonic uplift and
702
subsequent sea level falling.
703
The above distinguished criteria of tectonic pulses can be related to a
704
reactivation of the Syrian Arc System (SAS) during the Early Paleogene in
705
Egypt (Moustafa et al., 2003; Scheibner et al., 2003; El-Ayyat and
706
Obaidalla, 2016; Farouk, 2016). This SAS was a result of the convergence
707
between the Afro-Arabian and Eurasian Plates that started at Santonian
708
time and continued to the Miocene (Said, 1990; Moustafa et al., 2003).
709
Consequently, the authors can suggest that sedimentation of the studied
710
rocks was mainly controlled by tectonic activities that were formulated the
711
basins of deposition and subsequent sea-level changes. In terms of sea-level
712
changes, relative sea-level curve of the studied area (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5) is in
713
correspondence to the Paleocene-Early Eocene global sea-level curve of
714
Haq et al. (1988) and relative sea-level changes at the nearby areas of the
715
Western Desert of Egypt (Jain and Farouk, 2017; Farouk et al., 2019).
716 717
9. Conclusions
718
A detail facies analysis with the aid of P/B foraminiferal ratio and
719
Nannofossils of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession in the Farafra
720
Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt led to the recognition of different microfacies
721
and five 3rd order depositional sequences. The identified microfacies
722
indicate a deposition in inner, middle and upper shelf environments. The
723
inner shelf environment is represented by lagoonal (Alveoline-miliolid
724
packstone, algal alveoline packstone and nummulitic bioclast packstone),
725
tidal flat (dolomicrite) and patch reef facies (nummulitic wackstone). These
726
29
inner shelf facies are dominated in the Farafra Formation and the upper part
727
of Esna Formation. The middle shelf environment comprises the calcareous
728
shales, and planktonic foraminiferal wackstone/packstone with a relatively
729
moderate P/B ratio. These middle shelf facies are recorded in the middle
730
part of the Dakhla, Tarawan and Esna formations. The outer shelf
731
environment was recognized where there are planktonic foraminiferal–rich
732
shales, marls, lime mudstone, wackestone and packestone. These outer
733
shelf facies are mainly recorded in the basal parts of Dakhla, Tarawan and
734
Esna formations.
735
The recorded five depositional sequences (SQ1, SQ2, SQ3, SQ4 and SQ5)
736
are made up of transgressive (TST) and highstand (HST) systems tracts.
737
These sequences are bounded by six sequence boundaries (SB 1, SB 2, SB
738
3, SB 4, SB 5 and SB 6). These sequence boundaries are recognized by
739
lithologic and paleontologic criteria. The lithologic criteria include criteria
740
as calcretes, iron stained surface, bioturbation and erosional irregular
741
surfaces. The paleontologic evidences were detected where there are time
742
gaps (hiatus) as detected by nannofossils. The transgressive systems tract
743
(TST) comprises the retrogradational package of facies that indicate sea
744
level rise. This retrogradational facies are mainly represented by outer shelf
745
facies such as planktonic foraminiferal-rich packstone, mudstone and
746
wackstone, shales and marls. The highstand systems tract consists of
747
aggraditional to prograditional package of facies that reflect relative sea-
748
level fall. This aggraditional to prograditional facies includes inner shelf
749
facies such as alveoline miliolid packstone, algal alveoline packstone and
750
molluscan wackstone, dolomitized nummulitic bioclastic packstone,
751
30
nummulitic wackstone and nummulitic operculine packstone microfacies,
752
as well as shales with low P/B ratio.
753
Integrated results of field observation, facies analysis, sequence stratigraphy
and
biostratigraphy
(nannofossils)
indicate
that
754
the
755
sedimentation regime of the studied rocks was mainly controlled by
756
tectonic activities and subsequent sea-level changes.
757 758 759 760
Acknowledgements
761
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and
762
suggestions. Special thanks extend to editor of JAES for his help in editorial
763
support.
764 765
References
766
Abu Shama, A.A., Wanas, H.A. and El-Nahrawy, S.A., 2019. Calcareous
767
Nannofossil Biostratigraphy of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene Successions in the
768
Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences 150,
769
466-484.
770
Adabi, M.H., Zohdi, A., Ghabeishavi, A. and Amiri-Bakhtiyar, H., 2008.
771
Applications of nummulitids and other larger benthic foraminifera in
772
depositional environment and sequence stratigraphy: an example from the
773
Eocene deposits in Zagros Basin, SW Iran. Facies 54(4), 499-512.
774
Alhejoj, I., Farouk, S., Bazzen, Y., Ahmad, F., 2020. Depositional sequences and
775
sea-level changes of the upper Maastrichtian-middle Eocene succession in
776
31
central
Jordan:
Evidence
from
foraminiferal
biostratigraphy
and
paleoenvironments. Journal of African Earth Sciences 161, 103663. Alonso-Zarza, A.M., 2003. Palaeoenvironmental significance of palustrine carbonates and calcretes in the geological record. Earth Sci. Rev. 60, 261–298.
777 778 779 780
Aigner, T., 1983. Facies and origin of nummulitic build-ups: an example from the
781
Giza Pyramids Plateau (Middle Eocene, Egypt). Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie
782
und Palaontologie 166, 347-368
783
Arni, P., 1965. L’e´volution des Nummulitinae en tant que facteur de modification des de´poˆ ts littoraux. Me´m. Bur. Rech. Ge´ol. Minie`r. 32, 7–20. Arni P. and Lanterno E., 1972. Conside´rations pale´oe´cologiques et interpre´tation des calcaires de l’Eoce`ne du Ve´ronais. Arch. Sci. 25, 251–283. Aubry, M-P., Lucas, S., Berggren, W.A., 1998. Late Paleocene-Early Eocene Climatic and Biotic Events. New York, Colombia University Press, 513.
784 785 786 787 788 789
Beavington-Penney, S.J. and Racey, A., 2004. Ecology of extant nummulitids and
790
other larger benthic foraminifera: applications in palaeoenvironmental
791
analysis. Ear.-Sci. Rev. 67 (3-4), 219-265.
792
Blondeau, A., 1972, Les Nummulites. Vuibert, Paris, 245p.
793
Burchette, T.P. and Wright, V.P., 1992. Carbonate ramp depositional systems. Sed.
794 795
Geol. 79 (1-4), 3-57. Catuneanu, O., 2006. Principles of Sequence Stratigraphy. Elsevier. 386 p.
796
C´osovic´, V., Drobne, K. and Moro, A., 2004. Paleoenvironmental model for
797
Eocene foraminiferal limestones of the Adriatic carbonate platform (Istrian
798
Peninsula). Facies 50, 61–75.
799
Dickson, J.A.D., 1965. A modified staining technique for carbonates in thin section.
800 801
Nature 205, 587. Dunham, R.J., 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures. AAPG Memoir 1, 108-121.
32
802 803
Dupuis, C., Aubry, M.-P., Steurbaut, E., Berggren, W. A., Ouda, K., Magioncalda,
804
R., Cramer, B. S., Kent, D. V., Speijer, R. P. and Heilmann-Clausen, C., 2003.
805
The
806
Dababiya
Quarry
Section:
Lithostratigraphy,
clay
mineralogy,
geochemistry and paleontology. Micropaleontol. 49, 41-59.
807
El-Ayyat, A. M., 2013. Sedimentology, sequential analysis and clay mineralogy of
808
the lower Eocene sequence at Farafra Oasis area, Western Desert of Egypt.
809
Jour. Afr. Earth Sci. 78, 28–50.
810
El-Ayyat, A., Obaidalla, N., 2016. The impact of the Syrian Arc Orogeny on the
811
Early Paleogene rocks, western shoulder of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt.
812
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 454, 30–53.
813
El-Azabi, M. H. and El-Arabi, A., 2000. Depositional cycles: an approach to the
814
sequence stratigraphy of the Dakhla Formation, west Dakhla-Farafra stretch,
815
Western Desert, Egypt. Jour. Afr. Earth Sci. 30 (4), 971-996.
816
El-Azabi, M.H. and Farouk, S., 2011. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of the
817
Maastrichtian-Ypresian succession along the eastern scarp face of Kharga
818
Oasis, southern Western Desert, Egypt. Sedimentology 58, 579–617.
819
Farouk, S., 2016. Paleocene stratigraphy in Egypt. Jour. Afr. Earth Sci., 113, 126-
820 821
152.
Farouk, S., Marzouk, A.M. and Ahmad, F., 2014. The Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in Jordan. Jour. of Asi. Earth Sci. 94, 113-125.
822 823
Farouk, S. Khalifa, M, Abu El-Hassan, M, Papazzoni, C., Frontalini, F., Coccioni,
824
R., and Zaky, A., 2019. Upper Paleocene to lower Eocene microfacies,
825
biostratigraphy, and paleoenvironmental reconstruction in the northern Farafra
826
Oasis,Western Desert (Egypt). Micropaleontology 65, 381–406.
827
Flügel, E., 2010. Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 976 pp.
828
Geel, T., 2000. Recognition of stratigraphic sequences in carbonate platform and
829
slope deposits: empirical models based on microfacies analysis of Paleogene
830
33
deposits in southeastern Spain. Palaeogeo., Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol. 155, 211–
831
23.
832
Harris, M. K., Thayer, P. A. and Amidon, M. B., 1997. Sedimentology and
833
depositional environments of middle Eocene terrigenous-carbonate strata,
834
southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA. Sed. Geol. 108 (1-4), 141-161.
835
Hardenbol, J., Thierry, J., Farley, M. B., Jacquin, T., Graciansky, P.-C. D. and Vail,
836
P. R. 1998. Mesozoic and Cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic framework in
837
European basins. In: Graciansky, P., Hardenbol, J., Jacquin, T. and Vail, P. R.
838
(eds.). Mesozoic and Cenozoic Sequence Stratigraphy of European Basins, pp.
839
3–13.
840
Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J. and Vail, P.R., 1988. Mesozoic and Cenozoic
841
chronostratigraphy and cycles of sea level change. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings,
842
B.S., Kendall, C.G.St.C., Posamentier, H., Ross, C.A. and Van Wagoner, J.
843
(Eds.) Sea Level Changes. An Integrated Approach. Spec. Publ. Soc. Econ.
844
Palaeontol. Mineral. 42, 71-108.
845
Hermina, M., 1990. The surroundings of Kharga, Dakhla and Farafra oases. In: Said, R. (Ed.) The Geology of Egypt. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 259–292.
846 847
Hewaidy, A. A. and Strougo, A., 2001. Maastrichtian–lower Eocene benthonic
848
foraminiferal distribution and paleoecology of three outcrop sections in Farafra,
849
Egypt. Jour. Paleont. 1, 1-22.
850
Hewaidy, A. A., El-Azabi, M. H. and Farouk, S., 2006. Facies associations and
851
sequence stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous-Lower Eocene sucession in the
852
Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. 8th Int. Conf. Geol. Arab World. Cairo
853
Univ., Giza, Egypt, pp. 569-599.
854
Hottinger, L., 1983.Processes determining the distribution of larger Foraminifera in space and time.− Utrecht Micropaleontological. Bull. 30, 239–253.
855 856
Hottinger, L., 1997. Shallow benthic foraminiferal assemblages as signals for depth
857
of their deposition and limitations. Bull. Soc. Geol. France 168, 491–505.
858
34
Hunt, D. and Tucker, M.E., 1992. Stranded parasequences and the forced regressive wedge system tract: deposition during base level fall. Sed. Geol. 81(1-2), 1-9.
859 860
Jain, S., Farouk, S., 2017. Shallow water agglutinated foraminiferal response to Late
861
Cretaceous-Early Paleocene sea-level changes in the Dakhla Oasis, Western
862
Desert, Egypt. Cretaceous Research, 78, 1-18.
863
Khalifa, M.A. and Zaghloul, E.A., 1990. Carbonate lithofacies and depositional
864
environments of the Lower Eocene Farafra Limestone, Farafra Oasis, Western
865
Desert, Egypt. Jour. Afr. Ear. Sci. 11 (3-4), 281-289.
866
Khalil, M. and El-Younsy, A.R.M., 2003. Sedimentological approach to
867
high resolution sequence stratigraphy of the upper Cretaceous-Eocene
868
successions, Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. Egypt J. Geol. 47
869
(1), 275–300.
870
King, C., 2013 Paleocene depositional environments and depositional sequences in the Dababiya Quarry Corehole (Egypt). Stratigraphy 9 (3–4), 347–362.
871 872
Kulm, L.D., Roush, R.C., Harlett, J.C., Neudeck, R.H., Chambers, D.M. and Runge,
873
E.J., 1975. Oregon continental shelf sedimentation: Interrelationships of facies
874
distribution and sedimentary processes. The Jour. of Geol. 83(2), 145-175.
875
Millot, G., 1970. Geology of Clays, Weathering, Sedimentology and Geochemistry.
876
Springer Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin, 429p.
877
Moore, D. M. and Reynolds, R. C. Jr., 1997, X-Ray Diffraction and the
878
Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, (2nd ed.). Oxford Univ. Press,
879
Oxford, New York, 378 pp.
880
Moustafa, A. R.; Saoudi,A.; Moubasher, A.; Ibrahim, I. M.; Molokhia, H. and
881
Schwartz, B. 2003. Structural setting and tectonic evolution of the Bahariya
882
Depression, Western Desert, Egypt. GeoArabia 8 (1), 91-124.
883
Obaidalla, N.A., El Ayyat, A.M., Kassab, A.S., 2006. Biostratigraphical and
884
sedimentological studies on the upper Cretaceous/Paleogene sequence, Western
885
Desert, Egypt. Assiut Univ. J. Geol. 35 (2), 141–208.
886
35
Obaidalla, N.A., Hewaidy, A.A., Hosny, A.M. and Mahfouz, K.H., 2008. The
887
Paleocene/Eocene (P/E) transition at Kharga Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt:
888
litho-, bio-stratigraphy and paleoenvironment. 8th Ann. Meet. Paleontol. Soc.,
889
Cairo, Abstract, p. 7-8.
890
Omara, S. Hemida, I. and Sanad, S. 1970. Structure and hydrogeology of Farafra
891
Oasis. Western Desert, U.A.R. Seventh Arab Petroleum Congress. Kuwait,
892
paper 65
893
Pomar, L., 2001. Ecological enhancement of sedimentary accommodation:
894
Evolution from a carbonate ramp to rimmed shelf, Upper Miocene, Balearic
895
Islands. In: G. Camoin (Ed.) Paleoceanology of Reefs and Carbonate
896
Platforms: Miocene to Modern, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.,
897
Spec. Issue 175, 249–272.
898
Reichel, M., 1964. Alveolinidae. In: Moore, R.C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate
899
Paleontology, Part C, Protista 2. The University of Kansas Press, Lawrence,
900
Kansas, pp. 503–510.
901 Stratigraphy, facies analysis and
902
sequence stratigraphy of the Eocene succession in the Shabrawet area (north
903
Eastern Desert, Egypt): an example for a tectonically influenced inner ramp
904
carbonate platform. Arab J Geosci. 8, 10433–10458.
905
Sallam, E., Wanas, H.A., Osman, R., 2015.
Sarg, J.F., 1988. Carbonate sequence stratigraphy. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S.,
906
Kendall, C.G.St.C., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A. and Van Wagoner, J.C.
907
(Eds.), Sea Level Changes - An Integrated Approach. SEPM Spec. Publ. 42,
908
155–181.
909
Scheibner, C., Reijmer, J.J., Marzouk, A.M., Speijer, R.P., Kuss, J., 2003. From
910
platform to basin: the evolution of a Paleocene carbonate margin (Eastern
911
Desert, Egypt). Int J. Earth Sci. 92, 624–640.
912
Sherif, A., Boukhary, M., Abul-Nasr, R.A. and Obaidalla, N.A., 2019. Ypresian
913
Nummulites and their stratigraphic significance from El-Guss Abu Said
914
36
plateau, Farafra Oasis, Western Desert, Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences
915
12 (3), 72. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-4195-x.
916
Scholle, P. A. and Ulmer-Scholle, D. S. , 2003. A Color Guide to the Petrography of
917
Carbonate Rocks: Grains, Textures, Porosity, Diagenesis,” AAPG Memoir,77,
918
477 pp.
919
Sibley, D.F. and Gregg, J.M., 1987. Classification of dolomite rock textures. Jour. of Sediment. Res. 57 (6), 967–975. Singer, A., 1984. The paleoclimatic interpretation of clay minerals in sediments-a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 21, 251-293.
920 921 922 923
Singh, B.P., Singh, Y.R., Andotra, D.S., Patra, A., Srivastava, V.K., Guruaribam,
924
V., Sijagurumayum, U., Singh, G.P., 2016. Tectonically driven late Paleocene
925
(57.9–54.7 Ma) transgression and climatically forced latest middle Eocene
926
(41.3–38.0 Ma) regression on the Indian subcontinent. Journal of Asian Earth
927
Sciences 115, 124–132.
928
Soliman, M. F. and Obaidalla N. A., 2010. Danian-Selandian transition at Gabal el-
929
Qreiya section, Nile Valley (Egypt): lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy,
930
mineralogy and geochemistry. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-
931
Abhandlungen 258 (1), 1-30.
932
Srivastava1, V.K., Singh, B.P., Kanhaiya, S., 2019. Facies characteristics and
933
depositional environments of the middle Eocene (Lutetian) Harudi Formation,
934
Kachchh, Western India. Carbonates Evaporites 34, 373–388.
935
Sprong, J., Speijer, R. P. and Steurbaut, E., 2009. Biostratigraphy of the
936
Danian/Selandian transition in the southern Tethys. Special reference to the
937
lowest occurrence of planktic foraminifera Igorina albeari. Geologica Acta, 7
938
(1-2), 63-77.
939
Strougo, A., 1996. The lower Libyan stratigraphic succession in Farafra and Nile
940
Valley: A new correlation. M.E.R.C Ain Shams Univ. Earth Sci. 10, 53-74.
941
37
Tucker, M.E. and Wright, V.P., 1990. Carbonate Sedimentology. Blackwell
942 943
Scientific Publ. London, UK, 482 p. Wanas, H.A., 2008. Cenomanian rocks in the Sinai Peninsula, Northeast Egypt:
944
Facies analysis and sequence stratigraphy. Jour. of Afr. Ear. Sci. 52 (4-5), 125-
945
138.
946
Wanas, H.A. and Armenteros, I., 2019. Microbially-induced fluvial tufa in Gunna
947
hills, Farafra Oasis, Egypt: Facies analysis and stable isotopes. Journal of
948
African
949
Earth
Sciences
158,
103515.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103515
950
Wanas, H. A. and Soliman, H. E., 2014. Calcretes and palustrine carbonates in the
951
Oligo-Miocene clastic–carbonate unit of the Farafra Oasis, Western Desert,
952
Egypt: their origin and paleoenvironmental significance. Jour. of Afr. Ear.
953
Sci. 95, 145-154.
954
Van Der Zwaan, G.J., Jorissen, F.J., de Stigter, H.C., 1990. The depth dependency
955
of planktonic/benthic foraminiferal ratios: constraints and applications. Mar.
956
Geol. 95, 1-16.
957
Weaver, C.E., 1989. Clays, muds and shales. Developments in sedimentology.
958 959
Amsterdam: Elsevier., 556 p. Wilson, J.L., 1975. Carbonate Facies in Geologic History. Springer Verlag, New
960 961
York, 471p. Van Der Zwaan, G.J., Jorissen, F.J., de Stigter, H.C., 1990. The depth dependency
962
of planktonic/benthic foraminiferal ratios: constraints and applications. Mar.
963
Geol. 95, 1–16.
964
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E., and Billups, K., 2001, Trends,
965
rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present: Science 292, 686–
966
693.
967 968
38
Figures Caption
969
Fig. 1: Geological and location map of the Farafra area, Western
970
Desert (after Hermina, 1990 and Abu Shama et al., 2019).
971
Fig. 2: Lithological characteristics, microfacies types, depositional
972
environments, planktonic percentage ratio, sequence stratigraphic elements
973
and relative sea-level change of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession in
974
North Gunna.
975
Fig. 3: Lithological characteristics, microfacies types, depositional
976
environments, planktonic percentage ratio, sequence stratigraphic elements
977
and relative sea-level change of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession in
978
South Gunna.
979
Fig. 4: Lithological characteristics, microfacies types, depositional
980
environments, planktonic percentage ratio, sequence stratigraphic elements
981
and relative sea-level change of the Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession in
982
Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said.
983
Fig. 5: Lithological characteristics, microfacies types, depositional
984
environments, planktonic percentage ratio, sequence stratigraphic elements
985
and relative sea-level change of the Lower Eocene succession in Bir
986
Karawin.
987
Fig. 6: X-ray diffraction pattern of clay fractions of representative shale sample (K-18) in the Esna Formation at Bir Karawin. Table 1:
X-ray diffraction data for oriented clay fractions of shale
samples in the Esna Formation at the studied localities.
988 989 990 991 992
Plate 1. Photomicrographs showing:
39
993
A- Planktonic
foraminiferal
lime
mudstone.
Sample
33,
South
Gunna. Stained, Plane Polarized Light (PPL).
995
B- Dolomitic lime mudstone. Note the ferroan dolomite rhombs within
the
micrite
997
neomorphosed to microsparite. Sample Q 16, Esna Formation, Ain
998
Ramla-El-Quss
999
Said
(arrow).
section.
The
Stained,
micrite
crossed
was
996
partially
Abu
matrix
994
nicoel
(CN
view).
1000
C- Dolomitic fossiliferous lime mudstone. Nummulites sp. (arrow)
1001
is embedded in micrite with fine scattered dolomite rhombs. Sample
1002
K 10, Esna Formation, Bir Karawin section. Stained, (CN view).
1003
D- E, F- Nummulitic wackstone. Nummulites tests (NM) are the
1004
dominant allochems. Note that the microfacies contains Assilina sp.
1005
(AS), bryozoa (BY) and echinoderm spines and plates (EC). D-
1006
Sample Q 60, E, F- Sample no. Q 63, the upper part of the Esna
1007
Formation, Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said section. D- Unstained,
1008
plane polarized light (PPL). E, F- Stained, (CN view).
1009 1010 1011 1012 1013
Plate 2. photomicrographs showing:
1014
A- Planktonic foraminiferal wackstone. This microfacies includes
1015
planktonic foraminifera with spar filled chambers. Sample G 30, Dakhla
1016
Formation,North Gunna section. Stained, CN view.
1017
40
B- Bioclastic wackstone. The main framework grains are Alveolina sp.
1018
(AV) as well as echinoderm (EC), Sample No. Q72, Farafra Formation, El-
1019
Quss Abu Said. Stained, PPL.
1020
C- Bioclastic wackstone. Note the internal cavity is dissolved and the void is filled with sparry calcite.
Sample No. K39, Esna Formation, Bir
Karawin. Stained, CN view.
1021 1022 1023
D- Alveoline miliolid packstone. Alveolina sp. (AV) and miliolid
1024
foraminifera (MI) are the main components. Sample Q75, Farafra
1025
Formation, El-Quss Abu Said. Stained, CN view.
1026
E- Algal alveoline packstone. This microfacies includes calcareous algae
1027
(arrow), Alveolina sp. (AV) and bryozoa (BY). Sample Q74, Farafra
1028
Formation, Ain Ramla-El-Quss Abu Said. Stained, CN view.
1029
F- Planktonic foraminiferal packstone. This microfacies is made up of
1030
packed planktonic foraminifera with micrite matrix. The chambers of
1031
planktonic foraminifera are filled with ferroan sparry calcite. Sample 35,
1032
Tarawan Formation, North Gunna section. Stained, CN view.
1033 1034
Plate 3. Photomicrographs showing:
1035
A, B- Nummulitic operculine packstone. This microfacies includes
1036
Nummulites Sp. (NM), Operculina sp. (OP), Discocyclina sp. (DI) and
1037
many of fragmented microfossils. Sample Q58, Esna Formation, El-Quss
1038
Abu Said. Stained, A- CN view, B- PPL.
1039
C- Dolomitized nummulitic bioclast packstone. This microfacies contains
1040
nummulites tests (yellow arrow), pelecypod shell fragments (green arrow)
1041
as well as echinoderm plates and spines (red arrow) and brachiopods (blue
1042
41
arrow) in dense micrite enclosing fine crystalline dolomite rhombs. Sample
1043
No. Q66, Esna Formation, El-Quss Abu Said. Stained, CN view.
1044
D- Dolomicrite. Note the dolomite rhombs are fine crystalline, anhedral
1045
and ferroan. Sample Q50, El-Quss Abu Said section, Esna Formation.
1046
Stained, CN view.
1047
E- Calcareous quartz arenite. Note that the medium to coarse quartz
1048
grains floating on poiklotopic calcite cement. Notice also the corona texture
1049
around the quartz grains.
1050
Sample 53, caliche bed at the base of the
limestone unit capping South Gunna section. Stained, CN view.
1051
F- Recrystallized limestone. This microfacies contains void filling
1052
radiaxial fibrous calcite. Sample 54, South Gunna section. Stained, CN
1053
view.
1054 1055
Plate 4: photomicrographs showing:
1056
A- Undulatory surface that represents the first sequence boundary (SB 1).
1057
It lies between the Khoman and Dakhla formations (yellow arrow). It is
1058
overlain by thin gypsum layer (green arrow) at North Gunna section.
1059
B- Iron oxide layer (see arrow) represents the SB 2 that seperates between SQ 1 from SQ 2 within the Dakhla Formation at South Gunna section. C- Thalassinoides trace fossil at the base of the Tarawan Formation at North Gunna.
1060 1061 1062 1063
D- Ferruginous and gypsiferous shale between SQ 3 and SQ 4 at the
1064
Paleocene/Eocene boundary in the basal part of the Esna Formation at
1065
North Gunna section
1066
42
E- A close-up of the caliche layer overlying the Esna Formation at North Gunna section.
1067 1068
F- Undulatory surface (SB 6) separating SQ 4 from the overlying stromatolitic limestone unit (see arrows) at North Gunna section.
43
1069 1070
Table (1): Age
Fm
Section
S. No.
Smectite d- spacing (A°)
E s n a
Ypresian
North Gunna South Gunna
El-Quss Abu Said
Bir Karawin
Un
Gl
H
G 89
14.02
17
9.9
G 52
14.4
16.9
43
14.5
Q 50
Kaolinite Smq
d- spacing (A°)
Smq
Un
Gl
H
72
7.23
7.19
-
28
9.7
43
7.23
6.7
-
57
17.2
10
60
7.18
7.32
-
40
14.6
16.8
9.8
89
7.2
7.07
-
11
Q 42
14.8
16.6
9.9
89
7.1
7.2
-
11
Q7
14.16
17
10.1
62
7.2
7.2
-
38
K 18 K9
14.5 14.8
17 16.8
9.9 10.1
53 70
7.2 7.05
7.1 7.05
-
47 30
Fm = Formation, S. No. = Sample number, Smq = Semi-quantitative %, Un = Untreated, Gl = Glycolated, H = Heated
Assilina
dle
- Shale with low planktonic foraminifera
Alveolines
a an dF (Ear arafra f ly E oce ormatio ne) ns
Mid - NOP
Esn
- Do l num omitize d bioc mulitic lasti pac c k (DN stone P)
P)
- Nummulitic wackstone (NW)
- Dolomitic lime mudstone
NW
Esna Fm.
Bryozoa Calcareous algae
Nummulites
Dolomite rhombs
Operculina
Echinoderm fragments
Pelecypod fragments
Miliolids
Plankton foraminifera
NO
she
lf Out
er s
helf
- Sh fora ale rich min ifera in plank toni c Dak hla and T (Pal arawan Esn e a Fo fo o rma cene) rmatio ns tion (Ear ly E oce ne)
( e n o st P) f k c (P e pa n ) e to in W l s f k u (P M) rc ac e e f p op (P on al t r c s e ife iti ck ton in ul a m am al w uds m or u r f m N ife ic e n n i m o i t am ral l nk r a o f fe Pl ic ni i n o m kt ra n o a f Pl ic n o kt n a Pl
This study aims to reconstruct depositional environments and establish the sequence stratigraphic framework of the exposed Paleocene-Lower Eocene succession Microfacies analysis indicates a deposition in a carbonate shelf (inner, middle and outer) environment Five depositional sequences (SQs) separated by six sequence boundaries are recognized.
Prof. Wanas, H. A. PhD. (Geology)
Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences Menoufiya University, Egypt Email:
[email protected] Mobile: (+2) 01007902156
Date: 19/0/2019
Dear Editor-in-Chief of J. African Earth Sciences We are pleased to inform you that we are interest in Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of both carbonate and clastic rocks
Yours Sincerely, H.A. Wanas Abu Shama Sara El-Nahrawy