Journal Pre-proof Development of an EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid detection, quantitation and diagnosis of goose calicivirus Su Lin, Shizhong Zhang, Shao Wang, Kaichun Xie, Dandan Jiang, Shifeng Xiao, Xiuqin Chen, Shaoying Chen PII:
S0890-8508(19)30327-5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2019.101489
Reference:
YMCPR 101489
To appear in:
Molecular and Cellular Probes
Received Date: 10 September 2019 Revised Date:
1 November 2019
Accepted Date: 16 November 2019
Please cite this article as: Lin S, Zhang S, Wang S, Xie K, Jiang D, Xiao S, Chen X, Chen S, Development of an EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid detection, quantitation and diagnosis of goose calicivirus, Molecular and Cellular Probes (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.mcp.2019.101489. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1
Development of an EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid detection,
2
quantitation and diagnosis of goose calicivirus
3 4
Su Lin a,b†, Shizhong Zhang a†, Shao Wang a,b†*, Kaichun Xie c , Dandan Jiang a ,
5
Shifeng Xiao a,b, Xiuqin Chen a,b, Shaoying Chen a,b*
6
a
7
Agriculture Sciences, Fuzhou, 350003, China.
8
b
9
China
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of
Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, 350013,
10
c
11
*Corresponding author, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine,
12
Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, China.
13
E-mail address:
[email protected],
[email protected]
14
†
Animal Veterinary and Aquatic product Bureau, Nanping, 353000, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.
15 16
Su Lin:
[email protected]
17
Shizhong Zhang:
[email protected]
18
Shao Wang:
[email protected]
19
Kaichun Xie:
[email protected]
20
Dandan Jiang:
[email protected]
21
Shifeng Xiao:
[email protected]
22
Xiuqin Chen:
[email protected]
23
Shaoying Chen:
[email protected]
24
1
25 26
Abstract: An unclassified calicivirus (CV) detected in geese was recently reported and proposed
27
as a new member of the family Caliciviridae. There is limited information about the
28
epidemiology, etiology and detection method of goose-origin CV (GCV) to date. In
29
this study, an EvaGreen based fluorescence quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay was
30
developed and optimized for the detection of GCVs. The assay sensitively detected
31
GCV RNA template with a good linear standard curve We also demonstrated the
32
specificity and reproducibility of the detection method for GCVs. Thus, the method
33
developed in this study will benefit the investigation of possible sporadic outbreaks of
34
CV infections in geese, as well as epidemiological and etiological studies of GCVs.
35 36 37
Keywords: Goose calicivirus; RNA virus; EvaGreen real-time RT-PCR; viral
38
detection
39 40
2
41 42
Main text:
43 44
Caliciviruses (CVs) are small, nonenveloped viruses belonging to the family
45
Caliciviridae, which is currently classified into eleven genera: Lagovirus, Nebovirus,
46
Norovirus, Sapovirus,Vesivirus, Bavovirus, Nacovirus, Recovirus, Salovirus, Valovirus
47
and Minovirusand (Desselberger, 2019). The viruses are known to infect a wide
48
variety of hosts, including human, fish, swine, feline and bird (Cubitt et al., 1985;
49
Prasadet al., 1999; Chenet al., 2006; L' Hommeet al., 2009; Day et al., 2010; Wolf et
50
al., 2011; Wolf et al., 2012; Mikalsen et al., 2014; Alkan et al., 2015; Mor et al., 2017).
51
CVs possess a single-stranded, positive sense, RNA genome that consists of either
52
two or three major open reading frames (ORFs) (Lee et al., 2017). In the case of
53
goose caliciviruses (GCVs), two ORFs are described wherein ORF1 codes the
54
non-structural (NS) proteins and the major structural capsid protein VP1, while ORF2
55
codes the minor structural capsid protein VP2 (Wang et al., 2017).
56
The emergence of GCV in China in 2014 and 2017 caused concern among veterinary
57
practitioners (Liao et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2017). To date, the pathogeny and
58
epidemiology information of CVs in waterfowl is limited. Goose exposure to
59
calicivirus can be confirmed by using the random polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
60
and DNA-sequencing based assay. Although this method is reliable, it is also time
61
consuming, cumbersome, and difficult when testing a large number of clinical
62
samples. However, avian calicivirus, which seem to be prevalent in growth-stunted
63
chickens and turkeys (Day et al, 2013), is a new problem threatening the waterfowl
64
production industry. Therefore, a fast and sensitive diagnostic method to detect GCVs
65
is thought to be great importance. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) is 3
66
relatively rapid and precise for RNA identification. It has become a widely used
67
method for gene detection and quantitation in RNA viruses like CVs (Oka et al., 2006;
68
Park et al., 2009). The real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR can be carried out using
69
either probes or DNA dyes. Among the latter, EvaGreen is newly developed and
70
found to be the better alternative to the commonly used SYBR Green (Mao et al, 2007;
71
Eischeid, 2011). The aim of this study was to develop a rapid, simple, specific and
72
sensitive EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of GCVs.
73
One GCV isolate, MA (GenBank accession number: MN068022), found in a sample
74
of kindney tissue from a gosling with gout-malabsorption syndrome in the Fujian
75
province of China, was selected for the development of the real-time RT-PCR and
76
also used as the positive control in field sample tests in this experimental work. As
77
negative controls, different waterfowl-origin virus strains, including goose parvovirus
78
(GPV), Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), Novel duck reovirus (NDRV), Muscovy
79
duck reovirus (MDRV), duck hepatitis virus (DHV), duck plague virus (DPV), and
80
duck tembusu virus (DTMUV), were included. Viral RNA extraction was carried out
81
using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the methods recommended
82
by the manufacturer. The RNA concentration was measured on a Nanodrop 1000
83
spectrophotometer (Technilab, USA) and genomic copies were deduced. Aliquots of
84
the RNA template were stored at -80 °C before dilution until use. The GCV-specific
85
primers were designed based on waterfowl-origin calicivirus non-structural
86
polyprotein (NS) gene sequences from GenBank (GenBank accession numbers
87
KJ473715, KY399947, MH453811, MK204416, MN068022, MN175552, and 4
88
MN175556) using the Clustal W method of Lasergene 7.0 MegAlign program
89
(DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The primer pairs were chosen according to the
90
sequences of GCV isolate accession number MN068022. The F1 primer 5’-
91
GAGCGCACGCCTTCTA-3’ (covering nucleotides 2051–2066), and R1 primer 5’-
92
ACACCTGGGTTCTTCTTCAT-3’ (complementary to nucleotides 2116–2135), were
93
used
94
TCCCGCGTCATTTTGGCAACTACAAAC-3’ (covering nucleotides 1993–2019),
95
and R2 primer 5’- AGGTGTGAACAGTCTGCCTTGA-3’ (complementary to
96
nucleotides 2156–2177), were designed for the construction of the calibrator plasmid,
97
as a template for in vitro RNA transcriptions. The F1/R1 and F2 /R2 primer sets were
98
designed to amplify a PCR product of 85 bp and 185 bp, respectively. BLAST
99
sequence analyses were also performed to confirm the specificity of the designed
100 101
for
real-time
amplification
of
GCV.
The
F2
primer
5’-
primers. The presence of the GCV was demonstrated by amplification of a 185 nucleotide (nt)
102
NS sequence using a RT-PCR assay with primers F2 and R2. The purified RT-PCR
103
product of 185 bp was cloned into the vector pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI,
104
USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The resulting plasmid was
105
used to transform competent Escherichia coli DH5α cells and purified using a
106
QIAGEN plasmid purification kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's
107
instructions. The DNA sequence of the recombinant clone was verified by sequencing.
108
The obtained positive recombinant plasmid with the target gene was designed as
109
pGEM-NS185 and subsequently used as the standard plasmid DNA template for in
110
vitro RNA transcripts, which was carried out with the Guide-itTM sgRNA In Vitro
111
Transcription Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. 5
112
The real-time RT-PCR assays optimized for the detection of GCV were performed
113
using a Mastercycler® ep realplex system (Eppendorf, Germany) and One-Step
114
EvaGreen qRT-PCR Kit (ABM, Richmond, Canada). The one-step real time RT-PCR
115
was performed in 20 µl reaction volume containing 10 µl of EvaGreen qPCR
116
MasterMix, 0.4 µl of qRT-PCR Enzyme Mix (50×), 0.5 µl each of 10 µM F1 forward
117
and R1 reverse primers, 1 µl RNA template and 7.6 µl of Nuclease-free water. The
118
thermal cycle conditions included 15 min at 42 °C, 5 min at 95°C, followed by 40
119
cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 10 s. After the RT-PCR cycles,
120
a melting curve was generated (with the annealing temperatures 55°C to 95°C at a
121
linear transition rate of 0.1°C/s, where the reaction was held at 16°C upon completion)
122
to discriminate between the specific amplicons and the non-specific amplification
123
products. The Tm value was defined as the peak of the curve. The specific single peak
124
of melting curve corresponding to the GCV RNA template was detected at Tm =
125
82.7±0.33°C.
126
The real-time RT-PCR standard curve was generated under optimized conditions.
127
The GCV RNA template was diluted in a 10-fold dilution series ranging from 3 × 105
128
to 3 × 101 copies/µl and tested in triplicate within the real-time RT-PCR assay. As
129
shown in Fig.1 A and B, the standard curve covered a linear range of five orders of
130
magnitude, for which the slopes were -3.547 and R2 = 0.999. It was demonstrated that
131
the newly established real-time RT-PCR assay detected the standard RNA to minimal
132
3×101 copies from serial diluted samples and was feasible for the quantification of
133
GCV in samples. To assess the reproducibility of this new assay, the intra-
134
(within-run) and inter- (between runs) assay reproducibility were evaluated using
135
10-fold serial dilutions of the GCV RNA template (3 × 105 to 3 × 103 copies/µl),
136
tested in triplicate on three different days. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of 6
137
variation for cycle threshold values were in the range of 0.20-0.62% and 1.05-2.21%,
138
respectively (Table 1), demonstrating the good reproducibility of the assay. To verify
139
the specificity of the primers F1/R1 in the current one-step real-time RT-PCR,
140
amplification of RNA and DNA extracted from seven other waterfowl-origin viruses
141
(namely, GPV, MDPV, NDRV, MDRV, DHV, DPV, and DTMUV) were tested. In
142
addition, the GCV isolate MA and ultrapure water were used as positive and negative
143
controls, respectively. No positive results were obtained from the other seven viruses
144
and negative control. As expected, only GCV was detected as a single melting peak,
145
demonstrating the high specificity of the primers used (Fig. 2).
146
In addition, the sensitivity and specificity of the EvaGreen based RT-PCR was
147
compared with another conventional RT-PCR. Fresh tissues (such as liver, spleen,
148
kidney, intestine, etc.) were collected from diseased goslings (n=76) in 2018 from
149
different goose flocks in Fujian province. The geese were 5 to 12 days old and
150
suffered mostly from diarrhea and/or severe depression (ruffled feathers and
151
reluctance to move) or showed clinical signs of gouty arthritis and/or kidney disease.
152
Total RNA was extracted from the GCV stock, liver, spleen, and kidney samples using
153
RNAiso Plus reagents (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s
154
instructions. The conventional RT-PCR was performed in a single-step with the
155
SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System with Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase kit
156
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). The One-step RT-PCR was conducted in a 50 µl reaction
157
volume, containing 25 µl 2× Reaction Mix, 1µl (10 uM) each of the Primer (F2 and
158
R2), 5 µl RNA, and 1 µl SuperScript III RT/Platinum Taq Mix and 17 µl diethyl
159
pyrocarbonate-treated water. Amplification occurred in a 2720 thermal cycler 7
160
(Applied Biosystems®, California, USA) starting with a reverse transcription step of
161
45 °C for 30 min, then an initial denaturing step of 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40
162
cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extension at
163
72 °C for 30 s. There was a single final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. The results
164
showed that the conventional one-step RT-PCR was highly specific in detecting the
165
GCV RNA as indicated by the amplified product of 185-bp fragment but it was far
166
less sensitive in the GCV RNA when compared to that of the one-step real time
167
RT-PCR assay. The positive rate of GCV infection was 71.1% (54/76) by the
168
conventional RT-PCR, and 100% (76/76) by the real-time RT-PCR assay established
169
in the study. All samples positive for GCV in the conventional RT-PCR assay were as
170
well as positive in the real-time RT-PCR assay; on the contrary, about one third of the
171
samples that were negative for GCV in the conventional RT-PCR assay were detected
172
positively in the real-time RT-PCR assay. For those tissue samples that were positive
173
both in real-time RT-PCR and conventional RT-PCR assays, the copy number of
174
GCV RNA template ranged from 103.71 to104.88 copies/g. The tissue samples that
175
presented positive results exclusively in the real-time RT-PCR showed copy numbers
176
ranging from 102.55 to 102.92 copies/g. The real-time RT-PCR result herein suggested
177
that liver, spleen, kidney, and intestine, should be equally important to focus in the
178
detection of GCV. However, GCV loads in different tissues still need further research.
179
The partial NS gene sequences of GCV were identified by sequencing of RT-PCR
180
amplified products. The detected GCV contigs displayed similarity to calicivirus
181
isolates calicivirus goose/N/China/2012 (56.5–56.8% nucleotide identity), calicivirus 8
182
Dabbling duck/MW20/Australia/2013 (63.1–63.8% nucleotide identity), calicivirus
183
goose/H146/China/2014 (88.1-88.2% nucleotide identity) , calicivirus Mallard
184
duck/B6/Canada/2015 (57.1-57.3% nucleotide identity), calicivirus American black
185
duck/B76/Canada/2015 (56.1-56.2% nucleotide identity) , and calicivirus Pink-eared
186
duck/MW23/Australia/2017 (55.6-55.7% nucleotide identity). This means that
187
waterfowl-origin caliciviruses are highly diverse genetically, and more than one
188
calicivirus genus may exist in the same host species (Wang et al, 2017; de et al,
189
2019).
190
To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports available for the real-time
191
RT-PCR assay for the detection of GCV RNA. In this study, an EvaGreen-based
192
real-time RT-PCR is developed, allowing the detection and quantitation of GCVs.
193
The diagnostic tool showed a good specificity and a higher sensitivity than
194
conventional RT-PCR. Moreover, the sensitivity of this assay established was able to
195
test as few as 3×101 copies from GCV RNA standard samples. Reproducibility of the
196
developed method was also validated by the intra- and inter-assay. In conclusion, this
197
study reports the development of a rapid, sensitive, specific, and reproducible
198
EvaGreen-based real-time RT-PCR assay for detection, diagnosis and quantitation of
199
GCVs. The assay may be useful in the investigation of sporadic cases and unexpected
200
outbreaks of GCV infections, as well as in epidemiological surveys and etiological
201
studies.
202
Funding
203
This work was supported by the Fujian Public Welfare Project (2019R1026-3).
204
Conflict of interest 9
205
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests with any organization.
206
Reference
207
[1] Alkan F. Karayel, İ. Catella, C. Bodnar, L. Lanave, G. Bányai, K. Di Martino B.,
208
Decaro N. Buonavoglia, C. Martella V., Identification of a bovine enteric calicivirus,
209
Kırklareli virus, distantly related to neboviruses, in calves with enteritis in Turkey, J.
210
Clin. Microbiol. 53 (2015) 3614-3617.
211
[2] Chen R., Neill J.D., Estes M.K., Prasad B.V., X-ray structure of a native
212
calicivirus: structural insights into antigenic diversity and host specificity, Proc. Natl.
213
Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 8048-8053.
214
[3] Cubitt W.D., Barrett A.D., Propagation and preliminary characterization of a
215
chicken candidate calicivirus, J Gen Virol. 66 (1985) 1431-1438.
216
[4] Day J.M., Ballard L.L., Duke M.V., Schefflerm B.E., Zsak L., Metagenomic
217
analysis of the turkey gut RNA virus community, Virology Journal 7 (2010) 313.
218
[5] Day J.M., Zsak L., Recent progress in the characterization of avian enteric viruses,
219
Avian Dis. 57 (2013) 573-580.
220
[6] de Souza W.M., Fumagalli M.J., de Araujo J., Ometto T., Modha S., Thomazelli
221
L.M., Durigon E.L., Murcia P.R., Figueiredo LTM., Discovery of novel astrovirus and
222
calicivirus identified in ruddy turnstones in Brazil, Sci Rep. 9 (2019) 5556.
223
[7] Desselberger U., Caliciviridae Other Than Noroviruses, Viruses. 11 (2019) E286.
224
[8] Eischeid A.C., SYTO dyes and EvaGreen outperform SYBR Green in real-time
225
PCR, BMC Res Notes 4 (2011) 263-267.
226
[9] L' Homme, Y. Sansregret, R. Plante-Fortier, E. Lamontagne, A.M. Ouardani, M.
10
227
Lacroix G., Simard C., Genomic characterization of swine caliciviruses representing a
228
new genus of Caliciviridae, Virus Genes 39 (2009) 66-75.
229
[10] Lee J.H., Chung M.S., Kim K.H., Structure and Function of Caliciviral RNA
230
Polymerases,Viruses. 9 (2017) E329.
231
[11] Liao Q., Wang X., Wang D., Zhang D., Complete genome sequence of a novel
232
calicivirus from a goose, Arch Virol. 159 (2014) 2529-2531.
233
[12] Mao F., Leung W.Y., Xin X., Characterization of EvaGreen and the implication
234
of its physicochemical properties for qPCR applications, BMC Biotechnol. 7 (2007)
235
76-91.
236
[13] Mikalsen A.B., Nilsen P., Frøystad-Saugen M., Lindmo K., Eliassen T.M., Rode
237
M., Evensen O., Characterization of a novel calicivirus causing systemic infection in
238
atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): proposal for a new genus of Caliciviridae, PLoS
239
One. 9 (2014) e107132.
240
[14] Mor S.K., Phelps N.B.D., Ng T.F.F., Subramaniam K., Primus A., Armien A.G.,
241
McCann R., Puzach C., Waltzek T.B., Goyal S.M., Genomic characterization of a
242
novel calicivirus, FHMCV-2012, from baitfish in the USA, Arch. Virol. 162 (2017)
243
3619-3627.
244
[15] Oka T., Katayama K., Hansman G.S., Kageyama T., Ogawa S., Wu F.T., White
245
P.A.,
246
transcription-polymerase chain reaction, J. Med. Virol. 78 (2006) 1347-1353.
247
[16] Park S.I., Park D.H., Saif L.J., Jeong Y.J., Shin D.J., Chun Y.H., Park S.J., Kim
248
H.J., Hosmillo M., Kwon H.J., Kang M.I., Cho K.O., Development of SYBR Green
Takeda
N.,
Detection
of
human
11
sapovirus
by
real-time
reverse
249
real-time RT-PCR for rapid detection, quantitation and diagnosis of unclassified
250
bovine enteric calicivirus, J Virol Methods. 159 (2009) 64-68.
251
[17] Prasad B.V., Hardy M.E., Dokland T., Bella J., Rossmann M.G., Estes M.K.,
252
X-ray crystallographic structure of the Norwalk virus capsid, Science 286 (1999)
253
287-290.
254
[18] Wang F., Wang M., Dong Y., Zhang B., Zhang, D., Genetic characterization of a
255
novel calicivirus from a goose, Arch Virol. 162 (2017) 2115-2118.
256
[19] Wolf S., Reetz J., Hoffmann K., Gründel A., Schwarz B.A., Hänel I., Otto P.H.,
257
Discovery and genetic characterization of novel caliciviruses in German and Dutch
258
poultry, Arch Virol. 157 (2012) 1499-1507.
259
[20] Wolf S., Reetz J., Otto P., Genetic characterization of a novel calicivirus from
260
chicken, Arch. Virol. 156 (2011) 1143-1150.
261 262
Table 1 Variance analysis of Ct values for real-time RT-PCR assay Intra-assay variability Concentration of
cycle threshold
RNA templates
(Ct)
(copies/µl)
coefficient of variation
cycle threshold (Ct)
coefficient of variation
Mean
SD
(%)
Mean
SD
(%)
1×105
21.26
0.12
0.55
20.89
0.46
2.21
1×104
24.88
0.05
0.20
25.17
0.45
1.81
1×103
28.45
0.18
0.62
28.59
0.30
1.05
263 264
Inter-assay variability
Figure legends 12
265
FIG. 1. Detection of 10-fold serial dilutions (3 × 105 to 3 × 101 copies/µl) of the
266
template GCV RNA using the EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR. A: GCV real-time
267
RT-PCR amplification curve. B: Standard curve where each dot represents the cycle
268
threshold value for the template GCV RNA at a given copy number. The x-axis
269
indicates the copy number, ranging from 3 × 105 to 3 × 101 copies/µl, used in the
270
experiments. The y-axis represents the corresponding cycle threshold (Ct) values.
271
Each data point was amplified in triplicate of each dilution, and the equation below
272
the graph is the standard formulate for regression analysis to calculate viral copy
273
number.
274
FIG. 2. Specificity of the EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR in different viruses.
275
GCV isolate MA and DNA or RNA from seven other waterfowl-origin viruses and
276
RNA-free water were subjected to GCV-specific real time RT-PCR.
277 278
FIG. 1.
279
13
280 281 282 283 284
FIG. 2.
285 286 287
14
Highlights: 1. An EvaGreen based real-time RT-PCR assay was developed for detection and quantitation of newly emerging goose caliciviruses 2. The assay provides quantitative data that may be used to inform epidemiological and etiological studies