Accepted Manuscript Direct and indirect effects of silver nanoparticles on freshwater and marine microalgae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum tricornutum) M. Sendra, M.P. Yeste, J.M. Gatica, I. Moreno-Garrido, J. Blasco PII:
S0045-6535(17)30507-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.123
Reference:
CHEM 19041
To appear in:
ECSN
Received Date: 2 January 2017 Revised Date:
22 March 2017
Accepted Date: 28 March 2017
Please cite this article as: Sendra, M., Yeste, M.P., Gatica, J.M., Moreno-Garrido, I., Blasco, J., Direct and indirect effects of silver nanoparticles on freshwater and marine microalgae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum tricornutum), Chemosphere (2017), doi: 10.1016/ j.chemosphere.2017.03.123. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Direct and indirect effects of silver nanoparticles on freshwater and
2
marine microalgae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum
3
tricornutum)
4
Sendra, M.1*; Yeste, M. P. 2; Gatica, J.M.2; Moreno-Garrido I.1and Blasco,
5
J1.
RI PT
1
6
1
7
Andalusia (CSIC).Campus Río S. Pedro.11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
8
2
9
Faculty of Sciences, University of Cadiz, E-11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Department of Ecology and Coastal Management, Institute of Marine Sciences of
SC
Department of Material Science, Metallurgical Engineering and Inorganic Chemistry,
M AN U
10 11
*
12
Phone: +34956832612. Fax: +34956834701
Author for correspondence: Marta Sendra Vega. email:
[email protected]
EP AC C
14
TE D
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15
Direct and indirect effects of silver nanoparticles on freshwater and
16
marine microalgae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum
17
tricornutum)
18 The last decade has seen a considerable increase in the use of silver nanoparticles
20
(AgNPs), which are found in many every-day consumer products including
21
textiles, plastics, cosmetics, household sprays and paints. The release of those
22
AgNPs into aquatic environments could be causing ecological damage. In this
23
study we assess the toxicity of AgNPs of different sizes to two species of
24
microalgae, from freshwater and marine environment (Chlamydomonas
25
reinhardtii and Phaeodactylum tricornutum respectively). Dissolution processes
26
affect the form and concentration of AgNPs in both environments. Dissolution of
27
Ag from AgNPs was around 25 times higher in marine water. Nevertheless,
28
dissolution of AgNPs in both culture media seems to be related to the small size
29
and higher surface area of NPs. In marine water, the main chemical species were
30
AgCl2- (53.7 %) and AgCl3-2 (45.2 %). In contrast, for freshwater, the main
31
chemical species were Ag+ (26.7 %) and AgCl- (4.3 %). The assessment of
32
toxicological responses, specifically growth, cell size, cell complexity,
33
chlorophyll a, reactive oxygen species, cell membrane damage and effective
34
quantum yield of PSII, corroborated the existence of different toxicity
35
mechanisms for microalgae. Indirect effects, notably dissolved Ag ions, seem to
36
control toxicity to freshwater microalgae, whereas direct effects, notably
37
attachment onto the cell surface and the internalization of AgNPs inside cells,
38
seem to determine toxicity to the marine species studied. This research
40 41 42 43
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
39
RI PT
19
contributes to knowledge on the role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in determining the behavior of NPs in different aquatic environments and the interaction with microalgae.
Keywords: toxicity; silver nanoparticles; freshwater; seawater; microalgae
44
Introduction
45
As a result of the rapid development of nanotechnology in the last decade, the
46
production of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) has increased in the USA, Europe and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT East Asia (Wiesner et al., 2006, Vance et al., 2015a). This increased ENM production
48
for use in products marketed globally is largely thanks to the special physico-chemical
49
properties of ENMs in comparison with those of the same materials in conventional
50
bulk form (Auffan et al., 2009). In the case of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), their
51
production and application in consumer products is primarily related to the well-known
52
antibacterial property of the silver ion (Ag+) released from the particle’s surface. This
53
property also makes them useful for many other applications in products as diverse as
54
electrical devices, detergents, textiles, cosmetics, outdoor paints and agricultural
55
products, and in water treatment (Luoma, 2008, Rai et al., 2009, Wijnhoven et al., 2009,
56
Marambio-Jones and Hoek, 2010). AgNPs are the most popular advertised nanomaterial
57
in the consumer products inventory (CPI); they are present in 438 products (24% of the
58
total listed in the CPI updated in 2015 by Vance and colleagues), although AgNPs
59
account for less than 2% of total production of all NPs (Vance et al., 2015b). In Europe,
60
annual production of AgNPs ranges between 110 and 230 tons (Blaser et al., 2008).
61
Quantitative data on the release of AgNPs into the aquatic environment and
62
measurements of environmental concentrations of AgNPs are not currently available.
63
Consequently, the amount of AgNP input to the aquatic environment can only be
64
predicted by models, where recently the predicted environmental concentration was
65
0.76 ng·L-1 in surface water (Blaser et al., 2008, Mueller and Nowack, 2008, Gottschalk
66
et al., 2009, Gottschalk and Nowack, 2011, Gottschalk et al., 2015). However, there is
67
some evidence, in studies of wastewater and sediment, that silver is released from silver
68
nanoparticles in aqueous media (Brar et al., 2010, Colman et al., 2014, Hedberg et al.,
69
2014).
70 71
Nevertheless more analysis of environmental measurements is required to determine in
72
detail the sources and fate of those AgNPs.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
47
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 73 The most relevant processes that govern the stability and mobility of AgNPs in
75
the aquatic environment are agglomeration, aggregation, dispersion, sedimentation and
76
dissolution (Handy et al., 2008, Navarro et al., 2008a, Fabrega et al., 2011). The
77
dissolution process, in particular, is affected by external conditions, such as
78
temperature, pH, ionic strength, as well as the presence of organic and inorganic
79
molecules in the medium (Liu and Hurt, 2010).
80
Concerning the toxicity of AgNPs, the direct effect of the AgNPs and the indirect effect
81
mediated by the Ag+ released from their surface need to be differentiated (Wijnhoven et
82
al., 2009). Although data are available about the toxicity of AgNPs to microalgae, the
83
question of which factors (intrinsic and/or extrinsic) are the source of the effect and
84
mechanisms regarding the toxicity of AgNPs, is still under debate.
SC
M AN U
85
RI PT
74
AgNPs or ions that reach the cell wall could damage the cell membrane and cause loss of membrane integrity and cell lysis (Sondi and Salopek-Sondi, 2004,
87
Karlsson et al., 2008, Navarro et al., 2008b, Oukarroum et al., 2012, Oukarroum et al.,
88
2013). Oxidative stress is also associated with exposure to nanoparticulate and ionic Ag.
89
The high reactivity of NPs and the occurrence of oxygen can result in the formation of
90
free oxygen radicals at the NP surface (Nel et al., 2006). Other effects are associated
91
directly with the behavior of AgNPs, including physical adhesion, response to shading
92
and the internalization of AgNPs by cells (Navarro et al., 2008b, Miao et al., 2009,
93
Huang et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2016).
AC C
EP
TE D
86
94 95
The objective of this work was to assess the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that
96
affect the toxicity of AgNPs to freshwater microalgae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
97
(P.A. Dang) (CHLOROPHYCEAE) and to marine microalgae, Phaeodactylum
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 98
tricornutum (Bohlin) (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE), as model organisms in both
99
freshwater and marine environments. The effect of intrinsic characteristics of NPs (such as size and zeta potential) and extrinsic characteristics of culture media (such as
101
different pH and ionic strength,) on AgNPs dissolution, agglomeration, interaction
102
between NPs and cells and their effect on toxic response are also investigated.
103
According to the observed behavior of AgNPs in the culture media tested, a second
104
objective of this work was to determine the direct and indirect mechanisms of the
105
toxicity of AgNPs to microalgae.
106
Material and methods
107
Reagents: AgNP1 (<2 nm; US7130), AgNP2 (<15 nm; US7140), both in aqueous
108
suspension, and AgNP3 (30-50 nm US1036), in the form of nanopowder, were obtained
109
from US Research Nanomaterials, Inc. DCFH-DA (2’-7’-dichlorofluorescein diacetate),
110
and propidium iodide were supplied by Sigma Aldrich. All glassware was washed with
111
diluted nitric acid (10%) and rinsed several times with de-ionized water (Milli-Q) before
112
use.
113
Suspensions of AgNPs.
114
Stocks of AgNPs were prepared in ultrapure water immediately before the experiments.
115
Suspensions were sonicated with a tip sonicator (UP 200S Dr. Hielscher GmbH) for 10
116
min with cycle of 0.5 and frequency of 50.
118
SC M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
117
RI PT
100
119
Characterization of AgNPs (in 3 particle size groups: NP1, NP2 and NP3).
120
Particle size distributions and images revealing particle shape and nano-structure of the
121
samples were obtained by means of Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 122
microscope used was a JEOL2010F model, working at 200 kV. This instrument has a
123
structural resolution of 0.19 nm. The number of images recorded allowed the
124
measurement of 130 particles to determine average and mode size.
125
Textural features were characterized by measuring the physisorption of N2 at 196 °C, employing an Autosorb Quantachrome automatic device. Before measurements
127
were made, samples were subjected to a surface cleaning pre-treatment under high
128
vacuum at 200 °C during 2 hours. The isotherms obtained were used to calculate the
129
specific surface area (SBET) of the powdered sample. In the case of the AgNP1 and
130
AgNP2 samples, an estimate of total surface area was obtained from the TEM particle
131
size distributions.
132
The initial particle size of AgNPs were analyzed in ultrapure water, freshwater and
133
artificial marine water by Dynamic Light Scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern
134
Instruments, software version 7.10) at 1 mg·L-1. Furthermore, agglomeration was
135
assessed with the Zetasizer Nano ZS90 after 0, 0.5, 3, 6 and 24 hours. The zeta potential
136
of NP can be indirectly detected with DLS based on the electrophoretic mobility of
137
particles, and calculated by application of the Henry equation that expresses the
138
electrophoretic mobility of a particle as a function of its zeta potential, and of the
139
dielectric constant and viscosity of the medium (Malvern Instruments Ltd., 2007).
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
140
RI PT
126
141
Speciation of dissolved Ag in artificial freshwater and marine culture media.
142
The speciation of silver at 1 mg·L-1 in artificial freshwater and marine water was
143
calculated with the Visual Minteq 3.1 software, which is a chemical equilibrium
144
computer program that possesses an extensive thermodynamic database enabling users
145
to calculate the speciation, solubility, and equilibrium of solid and dissolved phases of
146
minerals in an aqueous solution (Gustafsson, 2006).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Dissolution of AgNPs in different culture media.
148
In order to quantify dissolved Ag originating from 1 mg·L-1 of AgNPs in artificial
149
freshwater and marine water, samples were filtered by ultra-filtration (3000 MWCO)
150
and subsequently measured by a single quadrupole (SQ) Inductively Coupled Plasma-
151
Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS) (Thermo Fisher ScientificTMiCAPTM RQ ICP-MS) in
152
KED mode. Samples were quantified against an Ag standard curve in 0.1 M HNO3. The
153
accuracy of the measurement was established through blanks and spike recovery
154
experiments (100±7 % recovery). The isotope analyzed was 107Ag. Sampling times were
155
0, 3, 24 and 48 hours. Dissolution experiments were conducted in triplicate. The limit of
156
detection (LOD) was 0.95 ppt.
157
Test organisms.
158
Two microalgae species were selected, one from freshwater environments
159
(Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Dangeard, 1888), CHLOROPHYCEAE) and the other
160
from marine environments (Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bohlin, 1897),
161
BACILLARIOPHYCEAE), both obtained from the ICMAN Marine Microalgae Culture
162
Collection (IMMCC). Cells were grown in filtered (0.2 µm) freshwater (pH: 7.2) and
163
marine culture medium (pH: 8.2) and F/2 marine medium without EDTA for two weeks
164
prior to the experiment (Guillard and Ryther, 1962, Fábregas et al., 2000). Synthetic
165
marine water used was the Substitute Ocean Water D1141-75 from ASTM (ASTM,
166
1975). The recipes of the culture media are provided in supplementary information.
167
Toxicity bioassays
168
Bioassays were carried out with AgNPs at the following concentrations 10, 40, 75, 150
169
and 300 µg·L-1. Experiments were performed under continuous visible light (300 µE-2s-
170
1
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
147
). Growth inhibition bioassays followed the OECD procedure (OECD, 1994), in order
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT to determine the effective concentration. Values for 50% inhibition (EC50%) after 72
172
hours were obtained for microalgae cellular concentration (initial cell density, 104 cells
173
mL-1). Cells were counted by flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6). All treatments and
174
controls were carried out in triplicate. EC50% growth inhibition values were calculated
175
using TSK 1.5 software (Trimmed Spearman-Karber method).
176
Sampling for flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6) was carried out at 6, 24, 48 and 72 h, for
177
AgNP1, AgNP2 and AgNP3 treatments.
Because forward light scatter (FSC) is correlated with the size or volume of a
SC
178
RI PT
171
cell or particle, this detector was calibrated with the SPH-PPS-6K kit from Spherotech,
180
Inc, and showed an r2 value of 0.98. The sphere diameters were in the following ranges:
181
2.0-2.4, 3.0-3.4, 5.0-5.9, 7.0-7.9, 8.0-12.9 and 13.0-17.9 µm. Side light scatter (SSC) is
182
correlated with the intracellular complexity (Shapiro, 2005).
183
M AN U
179
From 1 mL of each sample a volume of 100 µL was taken for analysis by flow cytometry to study the alterations in the cell size and intracellular complexity of the
185
microalgae selected. For cell complexity, microalgae populations were washed three
186
times with PBS and 0.02 M of EDTA to prevent interference from NPs adsorbed on the
187
cell walls. SSC signal should provide reliable data related to the degree of internal cell
188
complexity. In the same way, autofluorescence (FL3 670 nm) was assessed by flow
189
cytometry to study potential changes in the chlorophyll a content of microalgae.
EP
AC C
190
TE D
184
The effective quantum yield of photosynthetic energy conversion in PSII in
191
darkness was measured fluorometrically using a Phyto-PAM instrument (Heinz Walz
192
GmbH) equipped with an ED-101 US/MP Optical Unit. This parameter measures the
193
efficiency of the photochemical energy conversion process (Schreiber et al., 1995).
194 195
Production of intracellular ROS (reactive oxygen species: superoxide, hydroxyl and hydrogen peroxide) was quantified using the 2’-7’-dichlorofluorescein diacetate
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (DCFH-DA) method (He et al., 2002, Stachowski-Haberkorn et al., 2013). ROS
197
measurements were made at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h. For this probe a negative control
198
(without treatment) and a positive control with 0.1mM of H2O2 were employed. A
199
quantity of 80 µM DCFH-DA (0.8% DMSO) was added to 1 mL of fresh sample. After
200
thirty minutes in darkness, at room temperature conditions, ROS were measured by
201
green fluorescence (FL1, 533/30 nm) of stained cells using a flow cytometer. Finally,
202
the extent of oxidative stress was calculated from the number of cells that fluoresce
203
green (stained with DCFH-DA), as a percentage of the total number of cells counted by
204
the flow cytometer.
205
Membrane integrity was also quantified by the Propidium Iodide (PI) method (Xiao et
206
al., 2011). This endpoint was measured at 6, 24, 48 and 72 h. PI cannot cross the
207
membrane and intercalate with nucleic acids inside the cell if the membrane is intact,
208
but penetrates the cells if the integrity of the membrane is altered. PI stock solution
209
(0.15 mM) was prepared by dissolving PI into PBS buffer (pH 7.2) and stored at 4 ºC
210
until use. Samples were incubated for 20 min at the PI dosage (10 µg·mL-1 for 2·106
211
cells). Fluorescence of PI inside the cells was detected with an FL2 detector by flow
212
cytometry (the same equipment as was used for the ROS measurement). The proportion
213
of cells with membrane damage was calculated as the total number of cells that
214
fluoresce orange (stained with PI), as a percentage of the total number of cells counted.
215
Cell suspensions were incubated with the appropriate fluorochrome at room temperature
216
and darkness for the necessary time. The lowest fluorochrome concentration and the
217
shortest incubation time were chosen in order to obtain significant and stable staining of
218
cells without toxicity taking place.
219
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
196
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Statistical Analysis
221
All bioassays were carried out in triplicate. Data are shown as average ± standard
222
deviation between replicates. Statistical analyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS,
223
Statistics 23 program. To assess all the responses (cell growth, cell size, cell
224
complexity, chlorophyll a, effective quantum yield, % of ROS and % of cells with
225
membrane damage) two General Linear Models (GLM; SPSS, 2005) were developed
226
(McCullagh and Nelder, 1989, SPSS., 2005). The first GLM is a general model in
227
which all the factors are in competition, and the second GLM is segmented by medium
228
(freshwater and marine species). The fixed factors are medium (freshwater and marine
229
water), treatments (AgNP1, AgNP2 and AgNP3), concentration (10, 40, 75, 150 and
230
300 µg·L-1) and exposure time (6, 24, 48, 72 h).
231
Data were checked for homogeneity of variance (Levene test); a one-way Anova test
232
and a Dunnett post hoc test at p<0.05 were also applied.
233
Results
234
Characterization and behavior of AgNPs in different culture media.
235
Figure 1 and Table S1 give the main results corresponding to the nano-structure and
236
physical characterization of the three types of AgNPs investigated in this research. The
237
TEM study enabled us to detail the particle size distribution of each sample beyond the
238
nominal size values provided by the supplier. The range of particle sizes, as well as the
239
mean size value, for each sample varies significantly (4.5±2.3, 16.7±6.2 and 46.7±14.6
240
nm for AgNP1, AgNP2 and AgNP3, respectively). As confirmed by the textural
241
measurements, sample AgNP1 has the largest specific surface area, 71 m2g-1, followed
242
by 27 m2g-1 for AgNP2, and 10 m2g-1 for AgNP3.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
220
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Zeta potential was measured in the two different media. Higher zeta potential was
244
reported in artificial marine water than in freshwater media (Table S1). Figure S1 shows
245
the agglomeration of the three AgNPs employed over 24 h in the assayed culture media.
246
AgNP2 presented the smallest size of agglomerates in both culture media (fresh and
247
marine water) after 24 h of experiment. However for the agglomerates of the other NPs
248
there were differences with respect to size. In freshwater, the sequence of relative
249
agglomerate size was AgNP2 < AgNP3 < AgNP1, while in marine water it was AgNP2
250
< AgNP1 ~ AgNP3.
SC
251
RI PT
243
Ag dissolution from AgNPs also showed differences between the three NP treatments and between the two culture media. It was the AgNP1 that showed the
253
highest dissolution with respect to the other two NPs (AgNP2 dissolution was lower
254
than that of AgNP3) and in both culture media (Figure 2). These differences observed
255
among NPs seem to be related to the size of the NPs (checked by TEM). The dissolution
256
of Ag NPs showed differences in behavior between the two culture media. In artificial
257
freshwater, the percentage of Ag dissolved from 0 h to 48 h ranged between 1.8 and 4%
258
for AgNP1, between 0.3 and 1.4% for AgNP2, and < 0.1% for AgNP3. However, in
259
artificial marine water the percentage of Ag dissolved ranged between 35 and 95% for
260
AgNP1, between 14 and 23% for AgNP2, and between 0.38 and 1.25% for AgNP3
261
(Figure 2).
TE D
EP
AC C
262
M AN U
252
Considering the various chemical species formed from the dissolved Ag in each
263
media, these were: AgCl(aq) (64.3%) and Ag+ (26.7%) in freshwater media; and AgCl-,
264
AgCl2- (53.7%) and AgCl3-2 (45.2%) in marine media (Table 1 and Table S3).
265
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Toxicological responses of microalgae exposed to AgNPs
267
Cell density
268
The freshwater microalgae, C. reinhardtii, showed greater sensitivity to AgNP1 and
269
AgNP2 than to AgNP3. The lowest concentration tested (µg·L-1) caused growth
270
inhibition of more than 50% for AgNP1 and AgNP2, although AgNP1 seems to be more
271
toxic. For AgNP3, cell density did not show inhibition but there was a hormetic
272
response at the lower concentrations (Figure 3). Thus, the EC50% concentration after
273
72h for C. reinhardtii was < 10 µg·L-1 with both AgNP1 and AgNP2, and >300 µg·L-1
274
with AgNP3 (Table S5).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
266
In the case of the marine microalgae tested, P. tricornutum, it was AgNP2 that
276
provoked the greatest toxic response, with an EC50% concentration after 72h of 143 -
277
184 µg·L-1. However for this species, neither the AgNP1 nor AgNP3 exposure reached
278
the EC50% threshold at any of the concentrations assayed (Figure 3 and Table S5).
279
Cell size
280
For C. reinhardtii exposure to AgNP1 and AgNP2 resulted in increased cell size at
281
concentrations of 40 µg·L-1 and higher (p<0.05). After 72 h of experiment, the cell size
282
of the controls was 5 ± 0.15 µm and 8 ±0.6 µm for AgNP1 and AgNP2 at 300 µg·L-1,
283
respectively. However, differences in cell size were not found for exposure to AgNP3
284
(Figure 4). In the case of the marine microalgae, P. tricornutum, exposure to AgNP2
285
was the only treatment which produced changes significantly different with respect to
286
the controls (p<0.05) at 150 and 300 µg·L-1: controls had a cell size of 4 ± 0.2 µm,
287
while for the population exposed to AgNP2 the cell size increased to 6 ± 0.5 µm (Figure
288
4).
AC C
EP
TE D
275
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Cell complexity.
290
C. reinhardtii showed increased cell complexity when exposed to AgNP1 (after 48h of
291
experiment) and AgNP2 (at all exposure times) with respect to the controls (p<0.05).
292
After 72 h of exposure to AgNP2, the population of C. reinhardtii showed 4.6 times
293
more intracellular complexity than the control population (Figure 5). In the case of the
294
marine diatom P. tricornutum, cell complexity presented a trend similar to that of C.
295
reinhardtii. The population exposed to AgNP1 showed changes only after exposure for
296
48 h, while the population exposed to AgNP2 showed increased cell complexity at 48
297
and 72 h (p<0.05). In this latter case, exposed cells showed twice as much intracellular
298
complexity as the control populations (Figure 5).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
289
299
Chlorophyll a.
301
Chl a was measured by autofluorescence using flow cytometry (a FL3 detector). Data
302
showed changes in the Chl a concentration per cell in C. reinhardtii when cells were
303
exposed to AgNP1 and AgNP2 (p<0.05). The Chl a concentration decreased at 24 h and
304
48 h for exposure to AgNP1 (a decrease of 1.6 % with respect to the controls). For
305
exposure to AgNP2, differences were found after 72 h (a decrease of 1.4 % with respect
306
to the controls). Populations exposed to AgNP3 did not show significant fluctuations in
307
Chl a concentrations. In the case of P. tricornutum, a decrease of 1.5% was observed
308
with respect to the controls when exposed to AgNP1. In contrast, when the microalgae
309
population was exposed to AgNP2, the Chl a signal showed increases, with respect to
310
the controls, at 24 and 48 h (p<0.05). As with the other responses measured, the various
311
concentrations of AgNP3 tested did not produce significant changes in the Chl a value
312
(Figure 6).
AC C
EP
TE D
300
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Effective quantum yield of PSII.
314
Effective quantum yield of PSII showed a decrease in both microalgae when exposed to
315
AgNP1 and AgNP2 after 72 h (p<0.05). With respect to the effects on effective
316
quantum yield of PSII after exposure to AgNP3, C. reinhardtii did not show any
317
significant changes over time. On the other hand, for P. tricornutum, differences were
318
found after 24 and 48 h (p<0.05) (Figure 7).
319
Intracellular ROS.
320
For the freshwater species, intracellular ROS was higher with respect to the controls for
321
exposure to both AgNP1 and AgNP2 (p<0.05). After exposure for 72 h at 300 µg·L-1 an
322
increase of ROS of 22 and 45 % compared with controls was found for the population
323
exposed to AgNP1 and AgNP2, respectively, In the case of P. tricornutum, a significant
324
increase of ROS compared with controls (p<0.05) was recorded after exposure to
325
AgNP1, AgNP2 and AgNP3 for 48 and 72 h. The controls showed an increase of 6.5 %
326
in the level of intracellular ROS; for AgNP1 the increase was 31 %; for AgNP2, 53 %;
327
and for AgNP3, 52 %) (Figure 8).
328
Cells with membrane damage.
329
The population of C. reinhardtii showed significant increases in the percentage of cells
330
with membrane damage when exposed to AgNP1 and AgNP2 at the various
331
concentrations tested (p<0.05), but not after exposure to AgNP3. With regard to P.
332
tricornutum, exposure provoked an increase in the percentage of non-viable cells. Cells
333
exposed to AgNP2 suffered an increase in cell membrane damage, compared with
334
controls, after all exposure times assayed (p<0.05), whereas the population exposed to
335
AgNP1 and AgNP3 showed differences with respect to the controls only after 48 h of
336
exposure time (Figure 9).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
313
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Discussion.
338
The toxic effect of AgNPs, in three different size groups, on two microalgae species (C.
339
reinhardtii and P. tricornutum), from two different environmental compartments
340
(freshwater and marine water, respectively) have been investigated. The object is to
341
understand better the role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in the mechanisms of AgNP
342
toxicity to microalgae. Intrinsic factors studied include the size of NPs, their specific
343
surface area (SBET), zeta potential, and porosity, among others; extrinsic factors include
344
the behavior of the NP agglomeration process in different culture media. Previous
345
research suggests that, in both media, the Ag that is dissolved from AgNPs over time,
346
and the speciation of the dissolved Ag, are important factors involved in the toxicity of
347
metallic NPs in aquatic environments (Miao et al., 2009, Wijnhoven et al., 2009). In
348
this research, the starting hypothesis is that AgNPs trigger both direct and indirect toxic
349
effects on microalgae, depending on the environment to which the microorganism is
350
exposed.
SC
M AN U
TE D
351
RI PT
337
It has been demonstrated in many studies (Ratte, 1999, Hiriart-Baer et al., 2006,
353
Navarro et al., 2008b, Fabrega et al., 2011) that one of the main mechanisms of toxicity
354
of AgNPs is related to Ag dissolved from AgNPs, which in both media has a
355
relationship with the size and exposed surface of the AgNPs. The reactivity of small
356
NPs is potentially much greater than that of larger particles (Auffan et al., 2009, Ma et
357
al., 2011, Angel et al., 2013). In our case, for both culture media, freshwater and
358
marine, the order in terms of the percentage of Ag dissolved is AgNP1 > AgNP2 >
359
AgNP3. This finding is in good agreement with the TEM sizes and specific surface area
360
measured for these materials. Although differences in dissolution are found due to the
361
size of particles, these differences were more pronounced in relation to the culture
AC C
EP
352
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT media. In marine water we measured over 20 times more dissolved Ag than in our
363
experiments in freshwater media. This result agrees closely with Oukarroum et al.,
364
2012, who found almost 18 times more dissolved Ag in marine culture media than in
365
freshwater culture media (Oukarroum et al., 2012). The explanation for the much higher
366
dissolution of AgNPs in marine water than in freshwater is the high concentration (420
367
mM) of NaCl with respect to freshwater. The chloride compounds present in the
368
freshwater culture media are Cl2Co·6H2O, CaCl2·2H2O, and MnCl2·4H2O. Sodium
369
chloride catalyzes the dissolution of AgNPs, and so plays an important role in the
370
behavior of AgNPs in saline water and biological media (Kent and Vikesland, 2012).
SC
RI PT
362
M AN U
371
Differences in the various compounds present in artificial fresh and marine
373
water determine the formation of new species that contain Ag in their formulation.
374
These species and their percentage concentration are very different in the two biological
375
media, and the formation of new species of Ag can trigger an indirect toxic effect of
376
AgNPs for microalgae. According to the literature, the toxicity of AgNPs is mainly due
377
to free Ag+ ions. In the present study, the main species formed in freshwater were Ag+
378
(26.7%) and AgCl-(aq) (64.3%). In contrast, the species formed in marine water were
379
AgCl2- (53.7%) and AgCl3-2 (45.2 %). In marine culture media the chemical species
380
present are not as bioavailable to marine microalgae as in freshwater culture media. The
381
percentage concentration of total Ag+ in marine water was not very important in the
382
total percentage of all chemical species analyzed with Visual Minteq software: Ag+
383
showed a concentration in the marine culture medium of less than 1.9x10-10 µM, and in
384
the ranking of chemical species by concentration, Ag+ was in sixth place after AgCl3-2,
385
AgCl2-, AgCl (aq), AgBr (aq), and AgBr2-. However, the concentration of Ag+ in the
386
freshwater medium was greater, at 2.4x10-6 µM, and in the ranking by concentration of
AC C
EP
TE D
372
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT all the chemical species formed, it was in second place after AgCl (aq) at 5.9x10-6 µM.
388
Thus the concentration of Ag+ is four orders of magnitude greater in the freshwater than
389
in the marine culture medium. Considering the Ag dissolved from AgNP1 in each
390
medium (40 ppb for freshwater and 845 ppb for marine water) and using Visual Minteq
391
software, the concentration of Ag+ is, again, much higher in freshwater (9.88x10-8 µM)
392
than in marine water (1.59x10-10 µM).
RI PT
387
In general the GLM for both species of microalgae and all of the responses
394
measured (population growth, cell size, cell complexity, Chl a, ROS and cells with
395
membrane damage), showed statistically significant differences with respect to the
396
culture media, the AgNP treatment, concentration, time of exposure and, finally, the
397
interaction between factors. The effective quantum yield of PSII, on the other hand, did
398
not show statistically significant differences between the two species selected (Table 2).
M AN U
SC
393
With regard to the toxicity of AgNPs to freshwater microalgae C. reinhardtii,
400
the main toxicity seems to be related to indirect toxic mechanisms of AgNPs, such as
401
the amount of Ag+ present in culture media, which is in turn associated with the particle
402
size measured by TEM. However, the percentages of Ag dissolution from AgNP1 and
403
AgNP2 are very different but the toxicity of each type of nanoparticle is not very
404
different. Therefore, other factors related to the direct effect of AgNPs must influence
405
toxicity. For instance, changes in the cell complexity are found after exposure to both
406
AgNP1 and AgNP2; however, exposure to AgNP2 produced greater differences in cells,
407
with respect to the controls, than exposure to AgNP1. Changes in cell complexity are
408
reported to be related to the possible internalization of NPs (Suzuki et al., 2007). After
409
72 hour of experiment, C. reinhardtii showed changes in its cell complexity but only
410
when exposed to AgNP2. One reason for this higher uptake of NPs with AgNP2
411
compared to AgNP1 could be the lower stage of agglomeration reached by AgNP2 after
AC C
EP
TE D
399
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 24 h in freshwater media. Uptake of NPs by microalgae depends on the characteristics
413
of the cell wall, the thickness of which ranges from 5 to 20 nm (and this determines its
414
barrier properties) (Navarro et al., 2008a). The very small hydrodynamic size of AgNP2
415
in the agglomeration process after 24 h of experiment could explain why there was little
416
difference in the growth inhibition triggered by AgNP1 and AgNP2.
417
RI PT
412
In relation to the toxicity of AgNPs to marine microalgae, P. tricornutum, the mechanisms of this toxicity could be also controlled by other factors (i.e. by direct
419
effect of AgNPs, not related to Ag dissolved from AgNPs). It was found that AgNP2
420
caused a stronger toxic response in P. tricornutum with an EC50% concentration for
421
growth inhibition of between 143 and 184 µg·L-1. This direct effect could be due to
422
internalization of NPs and adhesion of AgNPs onto the cell wall. Some of the responses
423
measured, such as cell complexity, cell size and effective quantum yield, showed bigger
424
changes with respect to the controls with exposure to AgNP2. The toxicity of AgNP2
425
could be related to its stage of agglomeration, hence to the internalization and
426
interaction of small agglomerates with the cells, as AgNP2 showed a smaller
427
hydrodynamic size than AgNP1 and AgNP3 in artificial marine water after 24 h of
428
experiment.
M AN U
TE D
EP
429
SC
418
Changes in chlorophyll a (autofluorescence measured with FL3 detector) is an adequate means for assessing the physiological state of photosynthetic cells under
431
potential stress factors (González-Barreiro et al., 2004, Chalifour et al., 2009,
432
Hadjoudja et al., 2009). Some authors have stated that a decrease of chlorophyll a may
433
also be related to changes in environmental variables (Schoen et al., 1995, Tsiaka et al.,
434
2013). The loss of chlorophyll a found in this work is probably due to pollutants
435
interfering with pigments synthesis (Zhang et al., 2012), and is related to damage in
436
chloroplast ribosomes (S P Mayfield et al., 1995, Liu et al., 2012). Furthermore, a loss
AC C
430
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of chlorophyll a content may be due to inhibition in the electron transport chain in the
438
donor center, whereas an increase of chlorophyll a content should be due to inhibition
439
on the acceptor side. Both changes, an increase and a decrease of autofluorescence,
440
translate as the loss of effective quantum yield of PSII through the inactivation of some
441
PSII centers (Samson and Popovic, 1988, Cid et al., 1995).
442
RI PT
437
In both freshwater and marine microalgae, responses such as effective quantum yield, percentage of ROS and percentage of cells with membrane damage, were affected
444
by type of AgNPs and level of concentration. Our results differ from those of other
445
studies (Morones et al., 2005, Oukarroum et al., 2012). According to those authors, the
446
toxicity of AgNPs is mainly related to direct effects such as uptake of AgNPs and
447
attachment of AgNPs onto cells, triggering membrane damage. However, free Ag+ ions
448
from dissolved AgNPs were not considered in those studies. Other researchers have
449
shown the toxicity of AgNPs as being due to indirect effects such as the dissolution of
450
Ag (Navarro et al., 2008b, Angel et al., 2013). The present work shows for the first time
451
both direct and indirect effects of AgNPs acting under two scenarios, on freshwater and
452
marine microalgae, with intrinsic and extrinsic factors that together determine the
453
toxicity of AgNPs.
454
Conclusions
455
Our results have shown the mechanisms of toxicity of AgNPs in freshwater and marine
456
microalgae. Indirect effects seem to govern the toxicity of AgNPs to freshwater
457
microalgae, C. reinhardtii, where an intrinsic factor, particularly the size of the NPs,
458
determines the amount of Ag dissolved from the NPs; and extrinsic factors, like the
459
composition of the culture medium, govern the chemical species formed from dissolved
460
Ag, with a relatively large amount of Ag+1.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
443
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT On the other hand, direct effects seem to cause the toxicity of AgNPs to the marine
462
microalgae, P. tricornutum, where extrinsic factors, such as the agglomeration of NPs,
463
govern the toxicity to marine microalgae. The larger sizes of NP agglomerate that are
464
formed are not internalized by cells, while the smaller NP agglomerates are internalized
465
and have the effect of increasing cell complexity.
466
Acknowledgements
467
This research has been funded by the Junta de Andalucía (PE2011-RNM-7812 project
468
and FQM-110 group) and the Spanish National Research Plan (CTM2012-38720-C03-
469
03 and Project MINECO/FEDER MAT2013-40823-R). We also thank the SC-ICYT of
470
Cadiz University (UCA) for the use of its Electron Microscopy division facilities.
471
References
472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499
Angel, B.M., Batley, G.E., Jarolimek, C.V. & Rogers, N.J., 2013. The impact of size on the fate and toxicity of nanoparticulate silver in aquatic systems. Chemosphere, 93, 359-365. Astm, 1975. Standard specification for substitute ocean water. Designation D 1141-75 American standard for testing and materials. Auffan, M., Rose, J., Bottero, J.-Y., Lowry, G.V., Jolivet, J.-P. & Wiesner, M.R., 2009. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nature nanotechnology, 4, 634-641. Blaser, S.A., Scheringer, M., Macleod, M. & Hungerbühler, K., 2008. Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nanofunctionalized plastics and textiles. Science of the total environment, 390, 396409. Bohlin, K.H., 1897. Zur morphologie und biologie einzelliger algen. Brar, S.K., Verma, M., Tyagi, R. & Surampalli, R., 2010. Engineered nanoparticles in wastewater and wastewater sludge–Evidence and impacts. Waste management, 30, 504-520. Cid, A., Herrero, C., Torres, E. & Abalde, J., 1995. Copper toxicity on the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum: effects on photosynthesis and related parameters. Aquatic Toxicology, 31, 165-174. Colman, B.P., Espinasse, B., Richardson, C.J., Matson, C.W., Lowry, G.V., Hunt, D.E., Wiesner, M.R. & Bernhardt, E.S., 2014. Emerging contaminant or an old toxin in disguise? Silver nanoparticle impacts on ecosystems. Environmental science & technology, 48, 5229-5236. Chalifour, A., Spear, P.A., Boily, M.H., Deblois, C., Giroux, I., Dassylva, N. & Juneau, P., 2009. Assessment of toxic effects of pesticide extracts on different green algal species by using chlorophyll a fluorescence. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 91, 1315-1329. Dangeard, P.-A., 1888. Recherches sur les algues inférieures.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
461
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Fabrega, J., Luoma, S.N., Tyler, C.R., Galloway, T.S. & Lead, J.R., 2011. Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment. Environment international, 37, 517-531. Fábregas, J., Domínguez, A., Regueiro, M., Maseda, A. & Otero, A., 2000. Optimization of culture medium for the continuous cultivation of the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 53, 530535. González-Barreiro, Ó., Rioboo, C., Cid, A. & Herrero, C., 2004. Atrazine-induced chlorosis in Synechococcus elongatus cells. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 46, 301-307. Gottschalk, F., Lassen, C., Kjoelholt, J., Christensen, F. & Nowack, B., 2015. Modeling Flows and Concentrations of Nine Engineered Nanomaterials in the Danish Environment. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12, 5581-5602. Gottschalk, F. & Nowack, B., 2011. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13, 1145-1155. Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R.W. & Nowack, B., 2009. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environmental science & technology, 43, 9216-9222. Guillard, R.R.L. & Ryther, J.H., 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (cleve) Gran. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 8, 229-239. Gustafsson, J.P., 2006. Visual minteq. Capturado em de, 26. Hadjoudja, S., Vignoles, C., Deluchat, V., Lenain, J.-F., Le Jeune, A.-H. & Baudu, M., 2009. Short term copper toxicity on Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella vulgaris using flow cytometry. Aquatic Toxicology, 94, 255-264. Handy, R., Owen, R. & Valsami-Jones, E., 2008. The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology, 17, 315-325. He, Y.Y., Klisch, M. & Häder, D.P., 2002. Adaptation of Cyanobacteria to UV B Stress Correlated with Oxidative Stress and Oxidative Damage¶. Photochemistry and photobiology, 76, 188-196. Hedberg, J., Skoglund, S., Karlsson, M.-E., Wold, S., Odnevall Wallinder, I. & Hedberg, Y., 2014. Sequential studies of silver released from silver nanoparticles in aqueous media simulating sweat, laundry detergent solutions and surface water. Environmental science & technology, 48, 7314-7322. Hiriart-Baer, V.P., Fortin, C., Lee, D.-Y. & Campbell, P.G., 2006. Toxicity of silver to two freshwater algae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, grown under continuous culture conditions: influence of thiosulphate. Aquatic toxicology, 78, 136-148. Huang, J., Cheng, J. & Yi, J., 2016. Impact of silver nanoparticles on marine diatom Skeletonema costatum. Journal of Applied Toxicology. Karlsson, H.L., Cronholm, P., Gustafsson, J. & Moller, L., 2008. Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Chemical research in toxicology, 21, 1726-1732. Kent, R.D. & Vikesland, P.J., 2012. Controlled evaluation of silver nanoparticle dissolution using atomic force microscopy. Environmental science & technology, 46, 6977-6984.
AC C
500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Liu, J. & Hurt, R.H., 2010. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Environmental science & technology, 44, 2169-2175. Liu, W., Ming, Y., Huang, Z. & Li, P., 2012. Impacts of florfenicol on marine diatom Skeletonema costatum through photosynthesis inhibition and oxidative damages. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 60, 165-170. Luoma, S.N., 2008. Silver nanotechnologies and the environment. The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies Report, 15. Ma, R., Levard, C., Marinakos, S.M., Cheng, Y., Liu, J., Michel, F.M., Brown Jr, G.E. & Lowry, G.V., 2011. Size-controlled dissolution of organic-coated silver nanoparticles. Environmental science & technology, 46, 752-759. Malvern Instruments Ltd. Zetasizer Nano User Manual, Worcestershire, U.K., 2007. Marambio-Jones, C. & Hoek, E.M., 2010. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12, 1531-1551. Mccullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A., 1989. Generalized linear models: CRC press. Miao, A.-J., Schwehr, K.A., Xu, C., Zhang, S.-J., Luo, Z., Quigg, A. & Santschi, P.H., 2009. The algal toxicity of silver engineered nanoparticles and detoxification by exopolymeric substances. Environmental Pollution, 157, 3034-3041. Morones, J.R., Elechiguerra, J.L., Camacho, A., Holt, K., Kouri, J.B., Ramírez, J.T. & Yacaman, M.J., 2005. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 16, 2346. Mueller, N.C. & Nowack, B., 2008. Exposure Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 4447-4453. Navarro, E., Baun, A., Behra, R., Hartmann, N.B., Filser, J., Miao, A.-J., Quigg, A., Santschi, P.H. & Sigg, L., 2008a. Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology, 17, 372-386. Navarro, E., Piccapietra, F., Wagner, B., Marconi, F., Kaegi, R., Odzak, N., Sigg, L. & Behra, R., 2008b. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environmental science & technology, 42, 8959-8964. Nel, A., Xia, T., Mädler, L. & Li, N., 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. science, 311, 622-627. Oukarroum, A., Barhoumi, L., Pirastru, L. & Dewez, D., 2013. Silver nanoparticle toxicity effect on growth and cellular viability of the aquatic plant Lemna gibba. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 32, 902-907. Oukarroum, A., Bras, S., Perreault, F. & Popovic, R., 2012. Inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles in two green algae, Chlorella vulgaris and Dunaliella tertiolecta. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 78, 80-85. Rai, M., Yadav, A. & Gade, A., 2009. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnology advances, 27, 76-83. Ratte, H.T., 1999. Bioaccumulation and toxicity of silver compounds: a review. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18, 89-108. S P Mayfield, C B Yohn, A Cohen, A. & Danon, A., 1995. Regulation of Chloroplast Gene Expression. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 46, 147-166. Samson, G. & Popovic, R., 1988. Use of algal fluorescence for determination of phytotoxicity of heavy metals and pesticides as environmental pollutants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 16, 272-278. Schoen, D.J., Henry, G. & Grime, J., 1995. Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology. JSTOR.
AC C
549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
645
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Schreiber, U., Bilger, W. & Neubauer, C., 1995. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a nonintrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, 49-70. Shapiro, H.M., 2005. Practical flow cytometry: John Wiley & Sons. Sondi, I. & Salopek-Sondi, B., 2004. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of colloid and interface science, 275, 177-182. Spss., 2005. Linear Mixed Effects Modeling in SPSS: An Introduction to the MIXED Procedure. Technical Report LMEMWP-0305. Stachowski-Haberkorn, S., Jérôme, M., Rouxel, J., Khelifi, C., Rincé, M. & Burgeot, T., 2013. Multigenerational exposure of the microalga Tetraselmis suecica to diuron leads to spontaneous long-term strain adaptation. Aquatic toxicology, 140, 380388. Suzuki, H., Toyooka, T. & Ibuki, Y., 2007. Simple and easy method to evaluate uptake potential of nanoparticles in mammalian cells using a flow cytometric light scatter analysis. Environmental science & technology, 41, 3018-3024. Tsiaka, P., Tsarpali, V., Ntaikou, I., Kostopoulou, M.N., Lyberatos, G. & Dailianis, S., 2013. Carbamazepine-mediated pro-oxidant effects on the unicellular marine algal species Dunaliella tertiolecta and the hemocytes of mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Ecotoxicology, 22, 1208-1220. Vance, M.E., Kuiken, T., Vejerano, E.P., Mcginnis, S.P., Hochella Jr, M.F., Rejeski, D. & Hull, M.S., 2015a. Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 6, 1769-1780. Vance, M.E., Kuiken, T., Vejerano, E.P., Mcginnis, S.P., Hochella, M.F., Jr., Rejeski, D. & Hull, M.S., 2015b. Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 6, 1769-1780. Wang, S., Lv, J., Ma, J. & Zhang, S., 2016. Cellular internalization and intracellular biotransformation of silver nanoparticles in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nanotoxicology, 10, 1129-1135. Wiesner, M.R., Lowry, G.V., Alvarez, P., Dionysiou, D. & Biswas, P., 2006. Assessing the Risks of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 4336-4345. Wijnhoven, S.W., Peijnenburg, W.J., Herberts, C.A., Hagens, W.I., Oomen, A.G., Heugens, E.H., Roszek, B., Bisschops, J., Gosens, I. & Van De Meent, D., 2009. Nano-silver–a review of available data and knowledge gaps in human and environmental risk assessment. Nanotoxicology, 3, 109-138. Xiao, X., Han, Z.-Y., Chen, Y.-X., Liang, X.-Q., Li, H. & Qian, Y.-C., 2011. Optimization of FDA–PI method using flow cytometry to measure metabolic activity of the cyanobacteria, Microcystis aeruginosa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36, 424-429. Zhang, W., Zhang, M., Lin, K., Sun, W., Xiong, B., Guo, M., Cui, X. & Fu, R., 2012. Eco-toxicological effect of Carbamazepine on Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 33, 344352.
AC C
598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 646 Figures
648
Figure 1. Representative TEM Images and particle size distributions of AgNP1, AgNP2
649
and AgNP3.
20 nm
25 20
M AN U
10
50 nm
5 0 25
AgNP2
20
TE D
10
Particles %
15
EP
5 0 25
AC C
AgNP3
20
10 5 0
1
10
Particle size (nm)
100
Particles %
15
100 nm
650
Particles %
15
SC
AgNP1
RI PT
647
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 651
Figure 2. Dissolution of Ag from 1000 ppb of AgNPs over time. The error bars
652
represent the standard deviation (SD).
SC
RI PT
653
654
M AN U
655 656 657 658 659
663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676
EP
662
AC C
661
TE D
660
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 677
Figure 3. Cell density of C. reinhardtii and P. tricornutum when microalgae were
678
exposed to five different concentrations of AgNPs. Asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
679
680
EP AC C
682
TE D
681
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 4. Size (µm) of C.reinhardtii and P. tricornutum when microalgae were exposed
684
to five different concentrations of AgNPs. Asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
683
685
EP AC C
687
TE D
686
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 688
Figure 5. Cell complexity of C. reinhardtii and P. tricornutum when microalgae were
689
exposed to five different concentrations of AgNPs. Asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.
690
M AN U
SC
RI PT
691
AC C
EP
TE D
692 693
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 694
Figure 6. Autofluorescence (chlorophyll a) of C. reinhardtii and P. tricornutum when
695
microalgae were exposed to five different concentrations of AgNPs. Asterisk (*)
696
indicates p<0.05.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
697
AC C
EP
TE D
698 699
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 700
Figure 7. Effective quantum yield of photosystem II (E.Q.Y.) of C. reinhardtii and P.
701
tricornutum when microalgae were exposed to five different concentrations of AgNPs.
702
Asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
703
AC C
EP
TE D
704 705
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 706
Figure 8. Percentage of ROS of C. reinhardtii and P. tricornutum when microalgae
707
were exposed to five different concentrations of AgNPs. Asterisk (*) indicates p<0.05.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
708
709 710 711
715 716
EP
714
AC C
713
TE D
712
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 717
Figure 9. Percentage of non-viable cells of C. reinhardtii and P. tricornutum when
718
microalgae were exposed to five different concentrations of AgNPs. Asterisk (*)
719
indicates p<0.05.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
720
725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738
EP
724
AC C
723
TE D
721 722
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 739 740
Tables
741
Table1. Speciation of Ag in artificial freshwater and marine water.
742 % of total concentration Freshwater 26.7
AgCl (aq)
64.3
1
AgCl2-
8.6
53.7
AgCl3-2
0.02
45.2
AgSO4-
0.3
AgNO3 (aq)
0.06
M AN U
SC
Ag+
AgBr (aq)
0.03
AgBr2-
0.03
743 744 745
Marine water
RI PT
Species name
Table 2. General Linear Model (for both microalgae species)
Growth
TE D
GLM Type III
FL3
Cell size
Cell
ROS
complexity
Interceptation
*
Media
cell
yield
damage
Sig.
Sig.
Sig.
Sig.
Sig.
Sig.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
0.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Concentration
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Time
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Media*Treatment
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Media*Time
*
*
0.4
*
*
*
*
Treatment*Time
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Treatment
746 747
EP
Sig.
AC C
Factor
Membrane Quantum
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 748 749 750
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
751
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Supporting Information
area (m2/g)
AgNP1
4.5±2.8
71b
AgNP2
16.7±6.2
27b
AgNP3
46.7±14.6
4.9 c
Artificial
water
Freshwater
Marine water
Hydrodynamic radii (nm)
165.7
371.9
536.6
PDI: 0.37
PDI:0.62
PDI:0.79
189.3
313.8
271.9
PDI:0.37
PDI: 0.59
PDI:0.46
220.6
221
258.6
PDI: 0.4
PDI: 0.49
AC C
EP
PDI: 0.43
a
average data from particle size distribution obtained by TEM
b
estimate from particle size distribution data obtained by TEM
c
BET value obtained from nitrogen physisorption
PDI: polydispersity index
Ultrapure
Artificial
Artificial Marine
water
Freshwater
water
SC
(nm)
Artificial
M AN U
Specific surface
Ultrapure
TE D
TEMa
RI PT
Table S1. Characterization of AgNPs
ζ potential (mV)
-8.2.1±22.6
-17.5±23.4
-6.5±1
-9.93±22.5
-16.2±24.5
-5.6±2
-50.2±18.5
-21.7±21.9
-12.6±2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Table S2. Percentage of dissolved Ag from AgNPs over 48 hours of experimen
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Artificial freshwater
Artificial marine waters
AgNP1
1.8-4 %
35-95 %
AgNP2
0.3-1.4 %
14-23 %
AgNP3
<0.1 %
0.38-1.25 %
RI PT
From 0-48 hours
Table S3. Speciation of silver in artificial freshwater and artificial marine water. Chemical species formed in freshwater culture media Concentration (µM) 6.15E-16
Ag(SeO3)2-3
2.79E-17
SC
Ag (OH)2Ag+1
2.47E-06
Ag2MoO4 (aq)
3.53E-19
AgCl2
5.96E-06
M AN U
AgCl (aq) -
7.98E-07
AgCl3-2
1.56E-09
AgNO3 (aq)
5.33E-09
AgOH (aq)
3.40E-11
AgSeO3-1
TE D
AgSO4-
3.98E-11 2.42E-08 Concentration (µM)
Ag (OH)2-
4.63E-18
Ag+1 AgBr (aq) AgBr2
-
EP
Chemical species formed in marine culture media
1.93E-10 3.10E-09 2.44E-09 1.44E-11
AgBr4-3
1.50E-13
AgCl (aq)
9.74E-08
AgCl2-
4.97E-06
AgCl3-2
4.19E-06
AgF (aq)
6.37E-14
AgH2BO3 (aq)
7.50E-14
AgOH (aq)
1.93E-14
AgSO4-
1.57E-11
AC C
AgBr3-2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table S4. GLM for short cases (by species) C.reinhardtii
GLM Type III Sig
Sig
Interceptation
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Treatment
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
Treatment*Time
*
*
*
Concentration*Time
*
*
*
Treatment*Time
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Sig
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Growth
AC C
*
*
* *
Treatment*Concentration
*
*
Treatment*Time
*
*
Concentration*Time
*
Treatment*Time
*
* * *
*
*
0.3 * * *
Effective quantum yield
Sig
Membrane cell damage
Sig
ROS
Sig
Cell Complexity
Sig
EP
Treatment
Sig
Size (µm)
Interceptation
Sig
FL3
Factor
Time
*
*
*
GLM Type III
TE D
P.tricornutum
Concentration
*
*
*
M AN U
Treatment*Concentration
*
RI PT
*
*
ROS
Time
*
SC
Concentration
*
Effective quantum yield
Sig
Membrane cell damage
Sig
Cell Complexity
Sig
Size (µm)
Sig
FL3
Sig
Growth
Factor
0.2 * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
0.04
*
* *
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table S5. EC50% growth inhibition. Calculated with TSK software.
EC50% growth inhibition (µg L-1)
Species
AgNP2
AgNP3
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
<10
<10
>300
Phaeodactylum tricornutum
>300
162.5 (143.4-184.0)
SC
RI PT
AgNP1
>300
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
Figure S1. Agglomeration of AgNPs in different culture media after 24H.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Recipe of culture media Freshwater (Preparation for 1 L) Stock A: KNO3
80.88 g
Na2HPO4
5.67 g
MgSO4 · 7H2O
RI PT
Stock B: 49.3 g
Stock C: CaCl2 · 2H2O
22.19 g
525.94 mg
Cl2Co · 6H2O
2.37 mg
SO4Cu · 5H2O
2.49 mg
Cr2O3
15.19 mg
MnCl2 · 4H2O
M AN U
C6H5FeO7 · 5H2O
SC
Stock D:
197.9 mg
Na2MoO4 · 2H2O
24.19 mg
SeO2
1.10 mg
B12
TE D
Vitamins 30.0 mg
Thiamine (B1)
50.0 mg
EP
Biotine
35.0 mg
Reference: Fábregas J, Domínguez A, Regueiro M, Maseda A, Otero A. Optimization
AC C
of culture medium for the continuous cultivation of the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2000; 53: 530-535.
Artificial marine water: Standard Specification for SUBSTITUTE OCEAN WATER (Preparation for 1 L) Stock n° 1:
MgCl2·6H2O
555.6 g L-1
CaCl2
57.9 g L-1
SrCl2·6H2O
2.1 g L-1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
KCl
69.5 g L-1
NaHCO3
20.1 g L-1
KBr
10.0 g L-1
H3BO3
2.7 g L-1
NaF
2.1 g L-1
RI PT
Stock n° 2:
Preparation of Substitute Ocean Water: Dissolve in ultrapure water (± 500 mL) 24.534 g L-1
NaCl
4.094 g L-1
Na2SO4 2)
Add 20 mL L-1
M AN U
Stock n° 1
SC
1)
10 mL L-1
Stock n° 2 3)
Dilute to 1 L
4)
Adjust the pH to 8.2 with 0.1 N NaOH
Reference: ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 1975.
TE D
Standard specification for Substitute Ocean Water. Designation D 1141-75. Medium f/2 with double concentration of nitrate and phosphate. Basic components of stock solution: 75 g
PO4H2Na·2H2O
5g
EP
NO3Na EDTA-Na2·2H2O
2.4 g
FeCl3·6H2O
1.6 g
AC C
Dissolve in almost 300 mL de-ionized water and autoclave. When cooled, add:
0.5 mL of trace metal solution (Sol. 1) 50 mL of vitamin solution (Sol. 2)
Extend to 500 mL with de-ionized water. Store at 4ºC in the dark. 1 mL of the solution must be added to one L of culture. Solution 1 (trace metals): CuSO4·5H20
0.10 g
ZnSO4·7H20
0.22 g
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CoCl2·4H20
0.10 g
MnCl2·4H20
1.80 g
Na2MoO4·2H2O
0.06 g
Extend to a final volume of 10 mL and store in cold and dark as stock solution. Solution 2 (vitamins):
RI PT
Dissolve 50 mg of vit. B12 and 1 g of vit. B1 in 500 mL of de-ionized water, filter the solution through 0.22 µm, and store in cold and dark as stock solution. Silicate solution (for diatom cultures):
Dissolve 3.7 mL of silicate pure solution (in saturation*) in 100 mL of de-ionized water.
SC
Filter through 0.22 µm, and store in cold and dark. Add 1 mL of this solution to each L of culture.
* We use Silicate pure solution from PANREAC, code 2111714
M AN U
Reference: Guillard, R.R.L. & Ryther, J.H. 1962. Studies on marine planktonic diatoms, I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervaceae (Cleve) Gran. Can J Microbiol
AC C
EP
TE D
8: 229-239.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights: - Ionic strength and size of AgNPs govern the dissolution process. - Toxicity of AgNPs to freshwater microalgae seems to be determined by the presence of Ag+ in culture media (indirect effect). - Toxicity of AgNPs in marine microalgae seems to be ruled by direct effects of AgNPs, such as
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
adsorption to the cell surfaces and internalization mechanisms.