Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

17

Arifa Tahir*, Muhammad Arshad†, Faiza Anum*, Mazhar Abbas†, Sadia Javed‡, Mirza Imran Shahzad§, Abdur Rahman Ansari†, Ijaz Bano†, Farman Ali Shah¶ *Environmental Sciences Department, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan, †Jhang-Campus, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan, ‡ Department of Biochemistry, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan, § University College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, ¶Department of Chemical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan

17.1

Introduction of ecofuel

Energy consumption that is increasing gradually should be met by ecofriendly and less expensive energy sources. Therefore, nowadays the environment and economy are of substantial concern. Energy obtainable inside the universe is divided into two kinds: renewable and nonrenewable. Renewable sources are the unpolluted, fresh sources that are naturally found, 16% of the world energy demand is fulfilled from renewable energy sources [1]. Coal, unrefined petroleum, and fossil fuels are the most commonly used nonrenewable energy sources and meet more than 80% of the energy demand around the globe [2]. As a result of increasing demand and utilization, the measure of nonrenewable power sources is decreasing. This energy is basically used up by the vehicle, industry, and power generation sectors that are the main reason behind the polluted environment. Consequently, the world is leaving nonrenewable sources and switching toward energy sources that are effectively accessible, biodegradable, cheaper, and having the least effect on nature [3]. Such energies are generated from the materials that are naturally found [4]. A large portion of the fuels utilized are oil, coal-based, and produced from the natural remains of dead animals and plants that contain a rich portion of carbon and hydrocarbon (HC). Harmful gases are discharged when such fuels are combusted. With the expanding energy demand, the generation and utilization of such fuels are in abundance, and in this manner, have caused numerous genuine ecological issues such as air contamination, worldwide temperature alteration, rising ocean levels, and so forth [5]. Ecofuels impact people positively in different aspects, from the social [6] and financial effects to their environmental and prosperity impacts. The general execution of different ecofuels is to decrease the fossil energy use and decrease the ozonedepleting substance outflow. The net effect of ecofuels depends upon the feedstock type, the method of production, and the measure of fossil strength [7]. Energy is lost in several forms during its conversion to a final energy form, and that lost energy is Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102728-8.00017-6 © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

460

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

released into the atmosphere. This lost heat must be used and can be a potential ecofuel [8]. The ecofuel is obtained from natural resources, such as production of biogas, bioethanol and biodiesel from biomass, generation of electricity from various sources, and recycling/harvesting of energy from wastes. Ecofuel production can affect biodiversity. For instance, habitat loss happens when normal scenes are changed over into energy crop plantations or peat lands are dying. The yield of such fuels can have a beneficial outcome, for instance when it is used to restore degraded lands [9, 10]. Similarly, the ecofuel business is an imperative activity initiator. According to the Biotechnology Industry Association, the ecofuel business will create 190,000 livelihoods in the United States by 2022 [11]. A significant proportion of the energy products and ecofuels is ideal for natural over petroleum products [12]. Agriculturists can plant energy alternatives wherever on the planet, and a portion of these yields, for instance switch grass and jatropha, truly bloom with land that is worthless for producing sustenance crops. The yields in like manner ingest carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air, reducing the amount of warmth-receiving gases. Also, ecofuels make fewer darkcolored cloudiness and distinctive aggravations, influencing the soundness of people thoughtfully. Palm oil and biodiesel refined from palm oil are profitable, and help Malaysia and Indonesia economically. Although, agriculturists occupy large sections of land but consistently plan for palm estates where there are rain forests. This demolition incapacitates countless creatures and plant species and influences Earth’s atmosphere. The production of palm oil produces 10-fold the quantity of greenhouse gas as oil. Prolonged handling of cultivating items in country regions has been looked at as a framework for rural economic progress. By increasing the cost of farm items before they leave the region, new planning plants can make new business openings and make economic spinoffs in rural areas [13].

17.2

Global interest in ecofuels

According to the United State Energy Information Administration (USEIA), the world’s aggregate energy utilization increase through 2040 demonstrates a significant trend toward sustainable energy source utilization [14]. This sort of energy is perfect and delivers low outflows. Renewable energy sources will be divided into two types: preeminent clean energy, for example, sun-based, wind, power, wave and rain energy; and bioenergy, such as ecofuels and biomass [15]. Ecofuel is foremost a prudent and economic type of renewable energy source. Ecofuel will be used as a substitute for petroleum-based fuel and fuel used in vehicles. Ecofuel could be a fluid fuel made out of mono-alkyl esters of long-chain unsaturated fats from vegetable oils or alternative nonedible oil sources and animal fats, fulfilling the quality needs of ASTM D6751. The offered types of ecofuels are biobutanol, biohydrogen, biogas, renewable methanol, bioethanol, and biodiesel. The provision of environmentally friendly and economic fuels is a global challenge, where ecofuel production from biomass is still the dominant way to satisfy this

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

461

requirement. The world focus on greenhouse gas release and climate change, loss of our biological resources, and the social impacts of groundwater contamination and soil has compelled us to develop better techniques for utilization of biological resources [16]. Harvesting of energy from biological waste has become a key strategy of integrated waste management. From the various techniques, anaerobic digestion is the utmost technology. The feedstock for anaerobic digestion includes many no-food waste substrates such as manure; lignocellulosic wastes; industrial, agro and municipal wastes; food wastes; animal byproducts such as chicken litter, yogurt whey, wheat straw, and hay grass; malt whisky pot ale; and microalgae, demonstrating the global interest and significance of these substrates [17]. Between 1991 and 2001, world ethanol production rose from around 16 billion liters a year to 18.5 billion liters. World biofuel production rose from 38 billion liters to 60 billion liters between 2001 and 2007, advancing the call for energy crops such as rapeseed, palm oil corn, soy and sugar [14] (Fig. 17.1). The production of biodiesel has increased 700% between 2005 and 2015 and is expected to rise by another 35% by 2025 [18]. Fuel in grades E10, E85, and E100 is being utilized broadly in the United States, Brazil, France, and other countries (Fig. 17.2). In spite of the fact that it can be prepared from different feedstock, for example waste wood, rice husks, hemp, kenaf, sorghum, cotton, bagasse, sunflower, corn, grain and different biomasses, its generation from molasses (a result of sugar) is considered as the most cost-efficient. Nondangerous, water-dissolvable, and biodegradable ethanol is likewise considered ecofriendly and a standout among other fuels to combat air pollution from vehicles [19]. It contains 35% oxygen that aids in decreasing unsafe fumes and gases such

Fig. 17.1 World production of ethanol and biodiesel, 1980–2007.

Total world production, billion liters

60

50 Ethanol

40

Biodiesel 30

20

10

0 1979

1984

1989

1994 Years

1999

2004

462

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

5 4.5 4

Billion gallon

3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 USA

Brazil

(the) PRC

India

France

Fig. 17.2 The top five bioethanol producers (billion gallons) in 2006.

as carbon monoxide (CO) by as much as 30% and particulate issues by as much as 50% [20]. This fuel doesn’t just give higher-octane content, which does not contain lead, but it also generously lessens the ozone-depleting substance [21]. Bioethanol production is the biggest scale microbial process. Production of ethanol in industries utilizes sugarcane molasses and yeast in batch fermentation, to make ethanol. Side effects of this procedure are CO2 and production of methanol, acidic acid, and glycerol [22]. The developing markets of alcohol industries and fuel ethanol offer prospects of sugarcane manufacturing that are economically beneficial [23]. Industrial waste heat can also be a very potential ecofuel. The interest in the estimation of lost heat from various sectors, such as industrial, residential, transportation, and commercial, with the production of electricity worldwide is on the rise. A large amount of worldwide energy is wasted in the conversion process [7].

17.3

Ecofuel sources

Ecofuel are produced from natural waste materials [24]. It’s a sustainable fuel predominantly prepared from fats and biomass as well as the vegetable oils of animals. As said before, the fuel made out of mono-alkyl esters of long-chain unsaturated fats that may fulfill the demands of ASTM D6751 guidelines is called ecofuel. Sources for ecofuel production still should be examined more to discover new assets. Ecofuels are classified on environmental, social, and economic bases. The “second-generation (2G), third-generation (3G), and fourth-generation (4G)”ecofuels are known as the modern ecofuels.

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

463

17.3.1 Original (1G) ecofuel The first-generation (1G) ecofuels are normally obtained from crops used as food sources and vegetable oils. Food sources that contain sugar are sugar beets, rice, grain, potato squanders, and wheat, and they are the feedstocks to supply the ecofuels [25]. Nevertheless, corn and sugarcane are frequently utilized as feedstocks to supply firstgeneration bioethanol [26]. Brazil is an advanced country in using this fuel [27]. First-generation ecofuels are largely created from edible vegetable oils [27]. Firstgeneration ecofuels are generally made from edible soybean, vegetables, palm and mustard oil. Such ecofuels also confront economic, social, and environmental problems as these got from feedstocks which used as food. Utilization of edible items for ecofuel production ends up increasing food costs and furthermore emphasize on utilization of land that makes it unsustainable. Consequently, technologies are aimed at the employment of different feedstocks to beat the most vital deficiencies of firstgeneration ecofuels [28]. The ecofuel fulfill fuel properties to be used as motor fuel. Unadulterated ecofuels or additional blends used in IC (internal combustion) engines cause extra NOx and PM outflow than other fuels [29].

17.3.2 Second-generation (2G) ecofuel The second-generation (2G) ecofuels are got from an extensive group of feedstocks, extending from lignocellulosic feedstocks to municipal solid waste [30]. Other types of feedstock used for 2G ecofuel production include genus Jatropha curcas, Lesquerella oil, cotton seed, Pongamiaglabra, karanja and dicot genus oleoides, flaxseed oil, plant residues, grasses, wood, and biomass sources. 2G ecofuels do not seem to be being produced commercially as they need additional processing instrumentation and additional production prices as compared to 1G ecofuels. Nevertheless, the 2G ecofuel do not impose social, economic, and environmental difficulties and also do not obstruct our nutritional values and increase emphasis on barren land utilization as a result of its nonedible, ecofriendly and might progress on peripheral land [31]. The 2G ecofuel have other advantages. These can be utilized at any amounts in diesel engines with no modifications. It is a low-emission fuel that emits less CO, CO2, and HC than fossil diesel oil [32]. The 2G ecofuel have some magnificent fuel properties such as a high octane number, great lubricity, and ideal energy stability. They can be frequently mixed in any extent with diesel oil. The investigation on the 2G ecofuel feedstock assets has been carried out. The study listed 72 species and an additional Australian local species for 2G ecofuel production [33]. The investigation illustrated some additional local species, especially karanja, ocean mango almond, leaf tree radish, castor oil plant, kukui nut, queen palm, white cedar, foam bark, neem, mall-leaved tree, and pongam oil tree as a result of their high oil content in the seed and kernel. These species are effectively accessible, easily grown, and environmentally friendly. There is a huge exhibit of 2G species in Australia. Such species are frequently cultivated on barren lands such as coastline areas. As a result of the presence of some destructive acids in the oil of the above mentioned species, oil from such sources

464

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

are not edible by people. Therefore, 2G ecofuels will defeat the primary deficiencies of 1G ecofuels, for example economic and environmental problems that are solved and so forth. The 2G ecofuels have some physical and chemical properties that contrast with the fuel. A few factors have more impact on the fuel properties of ecofuels. The key elements are: carboxylic acid of the feedstock, nature of the feedstock, kind of production and processing methods, and postmanagement of the ecofuel. Standard attributes should have been kept up before ecofuel is used as a motor fuel. Despite the fact that ASTM and European ecofuel standards have utilized, a few nations have built up their own standard. Australia takes after the ASTM standard for ecofuel used inside automobiles [34].

17.3.3 Third-generation (3G) ecofuel Third-generation (3G) ecofuels are the fuels that are synthesized from algal biomass [35]. The algal biomass is produced at an extremely unique growth rate when compared with a common lignocellulosic biomass. As it were, the fuels relating to algal biomass are known as oilgae. It may have connection with utilization of CO2, the greenhouse gas as feedstock. Some researchers described that microalgae are 3G ecofuel feedstock. Green algae are photosynthetic aquatic living beings that can prepare their food. Microalgae make outstanding properties for use as 3G feedstock, such as being cultured as a moderate, high energy, environment friendly, and completely sustainable feedstock. They will develop on land that is undeveloped and water that isn’t proper for nutritional uses, in this manner limiting the strain on previously drained water sources [36]. It is predicted that alga can possibly supply a greater amount of energy per section of land to use than common crops. The lipid content of the microorganisms is the ideal aspect to pick up 3G ecofuel. More often, directed species inside the alga are Dunaliellasalina, Chamydomonas reinhardtii, and chlorella vulgaris as well as their high lipid content (around 60%–70%) and their high efficiency (7.4 g/L/day for C. vulgaris) [37]. Utilizing the typical transesterification process, 2G ecofuel lipids are frequently basically produced using alga. They will be submitted to hydrogenolysis to supply kerosene-grade alkane suitable to be utilized as drop-in aeronautics fuel. 3G ecofuels can be utilized as fuel blends such as aviation gasoline, diesel, gas, and jet fuel [38].

17.3.4 Fourth-generation (4G) ecofuels Fourth-generation (4G) ecofuels are the fuels that are got through fixed carbon from the air by new techniques such as biochemistry, geosynthesis, and petroleum hydroprocessing. The 4G ecofuel generation idea is characterized through algal metabolic synthesized structures. The 2G and 3G biomass feedstock retain CO2 though developing and changing over to fuel while 4G forms are totally unique. Many researchers described 4G ecofuel from various perspectives; Demirbas reported that 4G ecofuel are the modification of consumable fat and bio-diesel into biogasoline by the utilization of modern innovations [39].

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

465

There are two procedures to produce 4G ecofuels as revealed in previous studies. It is essential to catch carbon produced from industries, CO2 into water by elecrochemical strategy and to get fluid methanol. The sustainable power sources such as wind, hydro, solar, and geothermal energy are utilized as power and thermal energy. These procedures comprise the arrangement of catalytic synthesis and electrolytic splitting. They bring about low weight and temperature electrochemical synthesis techniques. Fluid inexhaustible methanol is a productive, discharge-free fuel that may blend with biodiesel and avionics oil gas. Inside the second system, the caught CO2 can be geosequestered by putting it away in oil and gas fields or saline aquifers. This carbon catch makes 4G ecofuel synthesis carbon negative rather than just carbon impartial, in light of the fact that it shows extra carbon than it produces. The previous studies confirmed that this method not exclusively catches and stores CO2 from the air, but also diminishes CO2 productions by exchange petroleum derivatives. 4G ecofuel is a complex ecofuel of aromatic and sulphur free fuel with a high cetane which is finished advancement of most recent sugarcane varieties using farming techniques. In the United States, they use bioethanol from corn and grain and biodiesel from soybeans as an alternate fuel. They set goals to interchange fossil fuel (30%) with ecofuels. The EU (European Union) produced more than 9.5 million of ecofuel in 2010, 67% of worldwide production. Various nations in the world take care of their fuel demand by totally extraordinary way to suit their requirements. Thirty nations in the world have communicated their particular ecofuel orders and focuses of ecofuel utilized. Moreover, a North American country includes a pilot E2 (2% bioethanol) ecofuel command inside the town of Guadalajara. Chile includes an objective for E5 and B5 (5% biodiesel); however, it has no present mixing command. The Dominican Republic includes an objective for B2 and E15 for 2015; however, it has no present order for blending. The plant item order for Panama is as per the following; in 2013 at E4 in 2014, E7 in 2015, and E10 in 2016. Fiji has affirmed willful B5 and E10 mixing in 2011. Kenya has related an E10 order. Nigeria hopes for E10; however no present order for mixing has been sent. Ecuador has set goals of B2 by 2014 and B17 by 2024. They likewise have a related E5 test case program in numerous areas [40].

17.4

Why ecofuels and ecofuel policies?

Three reasons are commonly referenced to defend ecofuel creation and ecofuel bolstering arrangements: energy safety, ecological effects, and maintenance for agribusiness and provincial improvement. Though petroleum products have risen as the overwhelming supply of energy since the modern transformation, endeavors to discover different wellsprings of energy have a long history. A noteworthy inspiration is the way that the load of petroleum products is settled (despite the fact that its size is dubious) and we will along these lines approach consumption eventually in the future [41;42]. Elective energy sources should, in this manner, wind up focused with the passage of time. The worldwide worry about the shortage of oil is additionally increased nationwide and explained as an “energy security” matter. In the United

466

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

States, the objective to diminish reliance on outside energy sources is commonly enunciated at the strategy level [43]. Ecofuels are made exceptionally alluring among contrasting options to petroleum products because they are inexhaustible, and they are fluid. Regardless of the way that consuming ecofuels adds to carbon emanations, much the same as consuming gas, the carbon transmitted is (in any event incompletely) just reused (It is assimilated from the environment by the feedstock usage to create ecofuels). This ecological effect, and its prospective advantages with regard to environmental alteration concerns, was greatly advertised as a legitimization for bioefuel bolstering arrangements [44]. The discontinuous ideas of numerous sustainable power source creation stages, and the absence of straightforward approaches to store inexhaustible power, keep on being real disadvantages for sustainable power sources [45]. Not at all like other sustainable power sources, ecofuels comprise a fluid fuel that can be promptly utilized for transportation, and this reality is of principal significance in clarifying the excitement for ecofuel creation. One of the conspicuous financial effects of ecofuels is to expand interest for a horticultural yield, past the customary uses for sustenance and bolstering. There is enthusiasm for the capability of ecofuels to help with rustic monetary advancement by prodding speculation and work in provincial territories with drowsy financial movement. The requirement for ecofuel arrangements, albeit normally taken as inferred by the prior remarks on the potential positive properties of ecofuels, from a monetary viewpoint requires an unmistakable contention. Eventually, the case must be made that there exist showcase disappointments that hinder an alluring portion of assets, and that the arrangements under thought really enhance the market results that would somehow or another prevail [8]. Externalities that influence the earth, obviously, should become the dominant focal point in this unique circumstance. Specifically, carbon emanations, which are believed to be an essential driver of worldwide environmental change, are probably not ideally evaluated (in spite of a panoply of charges and controls that influence them), as proven by the expressed target of most nations to diminish their level. The quest for energy security can correspondingly be identified with various conceivable market disappointments. The circulation of oil riches round the world, and the idea of oil extraction and exploitation, make this asset inclined to political control [46], which additionally debilitates the proficiency of the market in this setting. A related issue is justification of a part of national resistance consumptions to ensure access to outside oil, which is substantial. At last, from a given nation’s point of view, the national “energy security” contention attributes advantages to diminishing oil imports, which normally likewise achieve national welfare picks up from terms-ofexchange impacts [47]. When that is probably going to happen remains an open inquiry, and to be sure noncustomary oil sources may end up being the most aggressive substitutes for traditional oil for a long time [48]. For instance, a noteworthy late advancement in the United States is the extreme decrease in the cost of gaseous petrol (at a 10-year low in February 2012, an insignificant 23.8% of the value level in October 2005), which is credited to the shale gas blast empowered by (disputable) utilization of current water driven cracking (fracking) innovation.

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

467

Petroleum represents the biggest offer of US energy sources (37% out of 2010 as indicated by the EIA), and just around 33% of it is locally delivered (a fairly higher standard would require these arrangements to be at any rate as viable, opposite the expressed objectives, as elective energy strategies that could be executed).

17.5

Assessing the impacts of ecofuels

Extensive work is done to survey the effects of ecofuels. At its essential level, one of the traits of advancement of ecofuels is to influence a crucial change in interest for farming yield. Generally, the vast majority of the interest for farming yield has been driven by sustenance requests, either straightforwardly or in a roundabout way (e.g., bolstering utilized as a part of creature generation). Worldwide the progression of farming markets is in this manner driven by extending requests coming from developing total populace and evolving consumes less calories (more animal protein, which need increased assets to deliver), and due to growing supply because of efficiency increments and a few increments in arable land. Current advancement of ecofuel business includes conceivably noteworthy nonnourishment part to add up to request. To outline how ecofuels may influence rural and energy markets, and in perspective of the way that commands are rising as maybe the most authoritative approach implementin this setting, think about accompanying (amazingly adapted) portrayal of how a ecofuel order may function. Farming yield is utilized to provide nutrition or ecofuel. Transportation fuel can originate from gas (got from refining oil) and additionally ecofuel. This plan, obviously, is excessively shortsighted, making it impossible to give an adequate verbalization of the imperative monetary effects of ecofuels in genuine settings. The demand and supply in the rural and energy markets are influenced by numerous different approaches past ecofuel commands (e.g., fuel charges, ecofuel endowments, cultivate bolstering programs, exchange confinements, ecological controls), which affect asset allotment at the national level and exchange streams. Likewise, the kind of feedstock utilized as a part of ecofuel creation will matter, as will the geological conveyance of ecofuel generation. To get a firmer handle on the assessed monetary effects of ecofuels, including natural and welfare impacts, more farreaching models are attractive. Various demonstrating endeavors are currently accessible that review different highlights of ecofuel creation, and the key approaches accepted to be in charge of the development of the ecofuel area. In spite of the fact that a straightforward scientific classification is perhaps reductive, generally they contrast in the matter of whether they embrace a calculable general balance (CGE) approach or a fractional balance (PE) approach. Albeit other CGE models managing bioenergy exist [49], a demonstrating system that has been utilized widely in this setting is given by the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP), initially a CGE model of farming exchange. A progression of papers has stretched out and adjusted this model to make it reasonable for investigating ecofuels, including the expansion of a module that isolates worldwide land use in a few agro-biological zones. Probably the most noteworthy distributed GTAP questions are condensed in the informative supplement. As anyone might expect, the particular outcomes that one

468

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

gets rely upon the introduction of each demonstrating undertaking. By and large, it is known that rising oil costs were a vital component in the “ecofuel blast,” yet the part of different help arrangements has likewise been basic; the effect of the ecofuel extension on the synthesis of horticultural creation is critical, particularly the expansion of corn real estate in the United States and the increment of the oilseed region in the European Union; the total idea of US and EU approaches matters significantly and the investigation of these strategies ought to be done together instead of independently; land utilization changes are not inconsequential with trim cover ascending to the detriment of pastureland and business backwoods; the strategy of ecofuel orders diminishes the transmission of value unpredictability from the energy area to the agrarian segment, however may worsen the effect of farming supply stuns; unequivocally joining side-effects in the examination is vital and can impressively change the size of a few factors of premium; despite the fact that the evaluated roundabout Land Utilize Change (iLUC) is lower than that recommended by different examinations, the carbon advantages of ecofuels in respect to gas might be irrelevant. One of the other options to a CGE approach is given by PE, a multiware, multination/locale model of the farming part. A few investigations that depend on renditions of the FAPRI demonstrate are condensed in the supplement. One of the outcomes is to stress the part of oil costs in deciding the improvement and long-run size of the ethanol business: at oil costs in the scope of $60–75 a barrel, the corn-based ethanol industry is gauged to develop past 30 billion gallons/year. An outstanding use of this model was the estimation of iLUC impacts [50], which contended that corn-based ethanol really exacerbates GHG discharges. Be that as it may, in another application, [51] put forth the defense for much lower levels of carbon discharges because of iLUC impacts. Various different investigations are accessible, both for CGE and PE. With no claim of a comprehensive scope, some of these examinations are incorporated into the reference section. CGE models are alluring in light of the fact that they can interface the horticultural division to whatever remains of the economy, and record for input impacts. GTAP models likewise interface local rural parts crosswise over nations in terms of professional career and on a fundamental level can speak to reciprocal exchange streams. GCE models are likewise appealing for contemplating iLUC impacts because they regularly display rivalry for land crosswise over elective uses in an unequivocal manner. Assessing comes about crosswise over models with such auxiliary contrasts is characteristically exceptionally troublesome. In any occasion, even an easygoing correlation of the outcomes sum.

17.6

Expected environmental impacts of ecofuel

A quickened discharge of fossil-buried CO2 because of human activities is currently by and large acknowledged as a main consideration adding to the greenhouse impact [52]. Around 28% of the energy accessible for utilization in the EU25 nations is credited to transportation, over 80% of which is because of street transport [53]. Around 27% of essential energy is utilized for transportation around the world, which are additionally the quickest developing sectors [54]. Transport fuels are along these

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

469

lines promising focuses for the utilization of ecofuel to lessen the ozone depleting substance outflows. Subsequently the chemicals and fuels delivered from indigenous plant material can better backings political freedom, through enhancement and a diminished reliance on a couple of energy sources [55].

17.6.1 Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions It has been universally acknowledged that superseding the nonrenewable energy sources with ecofuel created from biomass would have significant and positive ecological change impacts by delivering lower levels of the ozone-depleting substances. Yields of ecofuel can reduce or offset ozone-depleting substance transmissions by expelling CO2 from the air. Ecofuels are only of a scope of options for substitution of ozone-depleting substance outflows [56]. Bioethanol’s effects on environment are obvious at each stage along the bioethanol synthesis value bind from sugarcane development to the utilization of mixed fuel. Mixing of the different ethanol concentrations with gas transmits extraordinary imminent of decreasing GHGs discharge. Transportation is in charge of around 21% of the national productions while likewise in charge of the major part of the oil utilized in Pakistan [57].

17.6.2 Offsetting of CO2 emission (carbon neutral) The CO2 outflows per unit of energy utilization are generally high in Pakistan, due to absolutely dependability on fossil fuels [58]. The amount of CO2 discharged from burning of ethanol is relatively the same as was used in photosynthesis for the development of the sugarcane utilized to generate ethanol [59]. The life cycle of ethanol demonstrates that there are least CO discharges in comparison with different fossil fuels. In this way ethanol can decidedly add to environmental change modification through lessening in CO releases.

17.6.3 Energy balance As the ethanol is an ecofriendly fuel, it is additionally energy efficient. Current investigation uncovers, the energy yield per energy input proportion for molasses based ethanol is greatly improved when compared with other feedstock as corn ethanol. Corn appears to have an equivalent energy adjust, diminishes ozone depleting substance discharges by under 20% in light of the fact that petroleum derivatives are utilized as a fuel and manures in the procedure and the energy inputs are right around 80% of the energy yield [60].

17.6.4 Potential economic gains The improvement of bioethanol production, put advances the two openings and difficulties, particularly for the nations having ecofuels at early stage. As Pakistan’s self-oil generation is low, ethanol synthesis from molasses can offer a fractional substitution for costly oil imports dependability. It will likewise possibly give an

470

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

additional source of income for farmers and the improvement of a bioethanol industry could support our infrastructure and rural development. Additionally, it might be useful for provincial poor who will get a superior cost and offer new fare openings. The advancement of a practical ecofuel industry conceivably will guarantee inexpensive and productive energy supplies to country zones, helping business exercises with persevering improvements in nutritional security. To assess financial effects of bioethanol, chain from the generation of feed stocks, their preparing, mixing, dissemination and promoting should be considered.

17.6.5 As import substitution Fossil fuels are concentrated in a few areas of the world, so the others have to import these fuels, increasing the burden on already low economies. Indigenously developed ecofuel can solve the issues. A move to indigenous fuel ethanol use can save the nation-state exports because of a reduction in oil utilization.

17.6.6 Better payment to farmers If ecofuels are obtained from ecofuel crops, these energy crops can make better prices. In this way the farmer will be benefit more. The sugar processes by and large produce 40,000–50,000 tons of molasses worth $3–4 million, which are utilized for procurement of sugarcane. More foreign exchange can be earned through ethanol produced using the same molasses; it may ease better payment to farmers. [61].

17.6.7 Water reuses Water reuse after treatment is a possibility for expanding water assets and constitutes an option of supply that could substitute freshwater and manure. Such practice is especially fascinating for water uses that do not require high standards [62]. The impacts of different levels of stillage concentrations on the yield of Jasmine (Oleaceae) blooming plants were examined. The physical and chemical attributes of anaerobically processed stillage were studied. Plant supplements such as nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium were examined, too. It was discovered that the yield of plants was great. In several specific situations, rather than land, the water scarcity acts as the vital limiting factor for ecofuel biomass production. Around 70% of fresh water saved all around is utilized for cultivation purposes [63]. Water assets for cultivation are ending up progressively rare in numerous countries because of amplified competition with industrial or domestic uses. Ecofuels presently account for about 1% of all water unfolded by crops generally, and around 2% of all water for irrigation purposes [64]. A considerable lot of the crops as of now used for ecofuel production have generally high water necessities at marketable yield echelons and are hence most appropriate for high-rainfall tropical zones, keeping in mind that they can be irrigated. In Brazil, 76% of sugarcane production is under rain-fed conditions, and in the United States, 70% of corn generation is rain fed. Indeed, even green plants that can be developed in semidry areas on fringe or polluted plots may require some water system [65].

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

471

Additionally, the feedstock processed into bioethanol can utilize huge amounts of water, chiefly for seeds and plant washing and for evaporative cooling. In any case, local water resource balances are maintained through the irrigated production of key ecofuel feedstocks. In northeastern Brazil and southern and eastern Africa, various irrigated sugar-producing areas are now working adjacent to the hydrological confines of associated river basins. On the base of water assets and land, in many regions, probable extension of irrigated zones may appear high; to assure water supply and land-tenure systems might not imitate with commercialized production schemes; the definite opportunity for amplified ecofuel synthesis beneath irrigated conditions on prevailing or novel irrigated lands is inadequate by infrastructural supplies. Correspondingly, extension may be constrained by advanced peripheral charges of water storing and land acquisition. Water quantity as well as quality is affected by ecofuel crops production. For instance conversion of woodlands or pastures into corn fields could cause problems such as infiltration into groundwater from excessive fertilizer solicitation, excess nutrient runoff, sedimentation, and soil erosion. Oxygen-starved “dead zones” in the Gulf of Mexico are due to excessive nitrogen in the Mississippi River system, where various forms of marine life cannot subsist. Ethanol and biodiesel production may consequence in organically polluted water that, if comes out unprocessed, might upsurge eutrophication of superficial water bodies. Conversely, already practiced wastewater management technologies can covenant viably with wastes and organic pollutants. More than 90% biological oxygen demand of wastewater is reduced by fermentation systems, consequently, water could be recycled and reused as well as the methane could be captured in the treatment scheme and castoff in energy production [66]. As reverences the dissemination and stowing phases of the cycle, because biodiesel and ethanol are decomposable, the latent for adverse influences on water and soil from drip and spills is abridged related with fossil fuels. Chemicals and pesticides washed into water bodies and deleteriously affect water quality [67].

17.6.8 Impacts on biodiversity Ecofuel generation can affect cultivation and wild biodiversity in certain positive terms, as barren grounds reclamation [68]. Yet, wild biodiversity might be powerless by loss of territory when the zone of crop production is broadened, however agronomic biodiversity is defenseless in the example of substantial scale mono cropping, that depends on a decreased hereditary material pool and can likewise prime to decreased utilization of natural varieties. Tropical areas are perfect for some ecofuel crops [69].

17.6.9 Land use aspects Sustainable generation of feedstock for ecofuel production with the benefit of utilization of use of barren land and abate the swift land use change in areas previously under cultivation is possible by significant yield gains and technological advancements. Expansion of crop production in areas that are reserved for water filtration, biodiversity preservation, and carbon sequestration like important environmental services

472

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

might result in harmful effects to environment. Available land for expanded crop production could be estimated after excluding the land and areas required to fulfill the amplified demand for livestock, food crops, and forest land [70]. A large area of this land might be utilized freely for ecofuel feedstock synthesis; all things considered, broad ecofuel synthesis on prevailing cropland could comparably increase expansion in the age of nonecofuel crops at some other place. Some lands that won’t not have been refined profitably in the past may twist up surprisingly profitable as product costs increase, and the financially viable region would be expected to change with expanded consideration for ecofuels and their feedstocks. Through administration practices and propel innovations, the intensification of land utilize should backup this opportunity, especially if production is to be ceaseless in the long time period [71]. Development of ecofuel will, by and large, prompt more prominent rivalry for land. For smallholders, ladies agriculturists or potentially pastoralists, who may have powerless landresidency rights, this could prompt displacing. A solid strategy and legitimate structure is required to protect against the undermining of occupations of families and communities. In a few countries or districts, ecofuel advancement may prompt the development of business land markets. In the meantime, land rental values are probably going to rise and poor small holders may not be in a situation to secure land through purchasing or leasing. Indigenous people groups might be especially helpless if their territory rights are not ensured by the legislature. Both land utilize alteration and intensification of agronomic crops cultivation on prevailing croplands can have significant unfavorable effects on soils, yet these effects similarly concerning any crop basically hinge on cultivating methods. By the removal of permanent soil cover, the incongruous cultivation procedures can increase soil erosion and decrease soil organic matter. The greenhouse gas emission increases (losses of soil carbon) and soil nutrient contents are reduced through evacuation of plant residues. Similarly, some other management practices such as crop rotation and conservation tillage could help in improving environmental eminence by minimizing adverse environmental effects with the advantage of increased bioethanol feedstock production. Soil quality could be improved in terms of increasing organic carbon levels and soil cover by growing perennials instead of annual crops. Distinctive feedstocks differ from their nutrient demand, level of land provision they need, and their oil impacts. Through recycling the nutrients from distillery wastes and sugar mills, the soil quality is kept upward. Reuse of deposits for nutrient recycling and soil fertility maintenance requires extensive production systems [72]. Less intensive management and less fossil energy inputs are needed for perennial lignocellulosic crops such as grasses, eucalyptus, willow, or poplar. Such crops could increase the soil quality and carbon after cultivation on poor quality land [73].

17.7

Land availability

The land openness for making ecofuels in an entrenched framework has an impact in the power economy. The settled areas contains a supportable truck movement system, where an entrenched railroad structure is available, trucks would simply take the

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

473

biomass to gather focus and after that it would be railed to the biorefinery. Tolerating that exceptional yield sugar trim is planted all around the biorefinery, the longest excursion a truck would need to make would be a 45 km round trip [74].

17.8

Social sustainability

17.8.1 Food versus fuel debate Ecofuels give a sustainable substitute to fossil oil fuels being utilized as a part of transport. These have been developed as socially and politically satisfactory other option to traditional transport fuels among the most recent decades. In any case, the most disturbing debate to hit ecofuels was that of food versus fuel. In Pakistan, the sugarcane procedure side effect molasses is the sole source for bioethanol generation at an industrial scale. Economically, foodstocks such as corn, wheat, rice, and potato are not being used for this reason. Along these lines, sustainable productions are particularly great. There are large unexploited approaches to convert crude molasses to bioethanol production, given that the exact management policies are in position. Alcohol synthesis won’t be founded on foodstuff things and neither one of the cultivating of foodstuff picks [75].

17.8.2 Employment generation A one-of-a-kind favorable benefit of ecofuels is the increase in job opportunities, and resultant cut on movement from rural areas to urban areas for employment. Significant prospects for business are accessible in the bioethanol sector in countries such as Pakistan. The sugar preparing plants, ethanol distilleries including 76 units give jobs to about 75,000 People. Sugarcane being a noteworthy cash crop gives the direct income to farmers and their dependents including 70% of the population relies on. Bioethanol and biogas synthesis units are an extra income source [76]. A refinery can suit very nearly 200–250 skilled or unskilled workers. Educated people of various fields such as chemical engineering, organic chemistry, and microbiology are additionally required for the activity and administration of the ethanol production units. In Brazil, in excess of 800,000 individuals were working for the ethanol industry until the end of 1980 [77]. Usage of ecofuel makes openings for work at fields and industry levels. This increase in jobs will lessen poverty because it is focused at poor people.

17.8.3 Job creation at farm level The majority of the openings for work made by expanded bioethanol synthesis will be because of potentially enhanced labor usage at the farm level to cultivate sugarcane. In the event that smallholders utilize their own particular land for sugarcane cultivation, the workload will be expanded and workers need to work more as smallholders don’t as a rule utilize different people. Because extra occupation won’t be made in such case

474

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

however it will increase salary. The big landowners will hire skilled and unskilled workers for land managers.

17.8.4 Ecofuel crop development: Equity and gender concerns Significant risks related with the advancement of ecofuels with worse revenue distribution and a weakening of women’ position. The distributional effect of synthesizing ecofuel crops will rely upon starting conditions and government strategies [78]. In any case, from the Green Revolution recommends that implementation was substantially less uneven than was first assumed. Besides, governments can effectively encourage cultivating at small scale, as described above. The effect on imbalance will rely upon the crops and innovation, with innovative technology favoring equivalent sharing of benefits. Other significant factors are sharing of land with secure rights or occupancy rights; the level of access by livestock farmers to input and yield markets and to credit; and a level playing field according to policies.

17.9

Political impacts of ecofuels

Strategies for inexhaustible liquid ecofuels have drawn in particularly unusual measures of assistance with a couple of countries given their assurance of benefits of interest in a small number of territories significant to governments, including rural development, ozone depleting substance, energy safety, trade modifies, regional improvement and financial open ways for developing countries. Bioethanol can be used particularly in automobiles expected to continue running on unadulterated ethanol or blended with fuel to make “gasohol”. Anhydrous ethanol is required for blending with gas. No engine alteration is regularly anticipated that would use the blend. Ethanol can be used as an octane-boosting, pollution-diminishing included substance in unleaded gas. World production of ethanol from sugar sticks, corn, and sugar beets extended from less than 20 billion liters in 2000 to more than 40 billion liters in 2005 [79]. This addresses around 3% of overall fuel use. Biodiesel is a produced from vegetable oils, animal fats, or waste cooking oil. It can be used clearly as fuel, which requires some engine changes, or blended with oil diesel [80]. Biodiesel has ended up being additionally engaging starting late because of its normal focal points. The cost of biodiesel, in any case, is the guideline impediment to commercialization of the thing. With cooking oils used as rough material, the possibility of an industrious transesterification process and recovery of awesome glycerol as a biodiesel result are basic decisions to be considered to cut down the cost of biodiesel [51] and [81]. The possible impact of biodiesel on proficiency is sure [82]. Various agriculturists raise oilseeds to use a biodiesel blend in tractors, and apparatus as an issue of game plan, to empower production of biodiesel and raise open care. It is all over less demanding to find biodiesel in nation zones than in urban groups. Additional components must be considered, for instance, what should be known as the essentialness required for taking care of, the yield of fuel from raw petroleum, the entry on creating sustenance, and the relative cost of biodiesel versus petrodiesel. Biodiesel approach should reflect that

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

475

subject by commandingly slaughtering the organization constrained impediments to its success. Biodiesel approach should be based relentlessly in the rationale of adaptability. Given the authentic setting of oil administrative issues, it is fundamental that the present course of action decisions ensure a free market for biodiesel. Producers of all sizes must be permitted to fight in this industry, without develop sponsorships, bearings and diverse mediations skewing the playing field. The age and utilization of biodiesel is empowered at first through the agrarian plan of supporting the advancement of nonsustenance crops. Plus, biodiesel is pardoned from the oil charge.

17.10

Conclusion and prospects for future

Consequently, increasing demand and consumption of nonrenewable energy sources worldwide faces three crucial problems: high fuel prices, climatic changes, and pollution. This energy is basically used up by the automobiles, industries, and power generation sectors and is depleting gradually. Due to these reasons, the world is switching toward ecofuels. Ecofuels ensure energy security, environmental concerns, interchange savings, and socioeconomic problems regarding the agricultural sector. Mostly, ecofuels are obtained from corn, sugar beets, and wheat, and biodiesels are obtained from oil seeds. To produce enough quantity of ecofuels, large areas of agricultural land are required for crop cultivation. World ecofuel production rose from 38 billion liters to 131 billion liters between 2005 and 2015, advancing the call for energy crops. Yield of ecofuel can reduce ozone-depleting substance transmissions by expelling CO2 from the air. Ecofuels are only a scope of options for substitution of ozone-depleting substance outflows. They provide potential economic gains. As Pakistan’s self-oil generation is low, ethanol synthesis from molasses can offer a fractional substitution for costly oil imports dependably and also give better payments to farmers. Ecofuels impact people positively in different aspects, from the social and financial effects to its environmental and prosperity impacts. The net effect of ecofuel depends upon the feedstock type, the method of production, and the measure of fossil strength. The interest in the recovery of lost heat from various sectors, such as industrial, residential, transportation, and commercial with production of electricity worldwide is on rise. Use of biofuel produced from feedstock formerly distresses regarding the food prices, effects of biofuel and their consequences for nutritional security. International trade should play its role toward fulfilling biofuel requirements around the world. Evaluation of the production and consumption record of total biofuels as of the EIA proposes objectively considerable. However, as decreasing carbon release into environment could be an international problem, the role of ecofuels would be maximized by efficient production and maximum utilization of ecofuel synthesized.

References [1] Obama B. The irreversible momentum of clean energy. Science 2017;355(6321):126–9. [2] Agarwal AK. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2007;33(3):233–71.

476

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

[3] Lund H. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy 2007;32(6):912–9. [4] Arevalo-Gallegos A, Ahmad Z, Asgher M, Parra-Saldivar R, Iqbal HM. Lignocellulose: a sustainable material to produce value-added products with a zero waste approach—a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2017;99:308–18. [5] Fattah IR, Masjuki H, Liaquat A, Ramli R, Kalam M, Riazuddin V. Impact of various biodiesel fuels obtained from edible and nonedible oils on engine exhaust gas and noise emissions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013;18:552–67. [6] Arshad M, Bano I, Younus M, Khan A, Rahman A. Health concerns associated with biofuel production. In: Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production. Springer; 2018. p. 97–105. [7] Pilusa TJ, Muzenda E, Shukla M. Thermo-chemical extraction of fuel oil from waste lubricating grease. Waste Manag 2013;33(6):1509–15. [8] Forman C, Muritala IK, Pardemann R, Meyer B. Estimating the global waste heat potential. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016;57:1568–79. [9] Cherubini F. The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag 2010;51(7):1412–21. [10] Arshad M, Zia MA, Asghar M, Bhatti H. Improving bio-ethanol yield: using virginiamycin and sodium flouride at a Pakistani distillery. Afr J Biotechnol 2011;10(53):11071. [11] Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006; 103(30):11206–10. [12] Nhamo G. Dawn of a new climate order: analysis of USA + BASIC collaborative frameworks. Politikon 2010;37(2–3):353–76. [13] Arshad M, Bano I, Khan N, Shahzad MI, Younus M, Abbas M, et al. Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: an assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2018;81:1241–6. [14] Mekhilef S, Siga S, Saidur R. A review on palm oil biodiesel as a source of renewable fuel. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2011;15(4):1937–49. [15] Arshad M, Ahmed S, Zia MA, Rajoka MI. Kinetics and thermodynamics of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLD10 using molasses. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014;172(5):2455–64. [16] Morrison SA, Macdonald N, Walker K, Lozier L, Shaw MR. Facing the dilemma at eradication’s end: uncertainty of absence and the Lazarus effect. Front Ecol Environ 2007;5(5):271–6. [17] Bano I, Arshad M. Climatic changes impact on water availability. In: Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production. Springer; 2018. p. 39–54. [18] Nelles M, Pivato A. Special section: Biological waste to energy. Elsevier; 2018. [19] Naylor RL, Higgins MM. The rise in global biodiesel production: implications for food security. Glob Food Sec 2018;16:75–84. [20] Outlook OFA. Paris: OECD/FAO; 2012. [21] Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F. Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global overview. Energy Policy 2011;39(3):1630–46. [22] Glozer KG. Corn ethanol: Who pays? who benefits? Hoover Press; 2013. [23] Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng 2000;2(1):69–77. [24] Brexo´ RP, Sant’Ana AS. Microbial interactions during sugar cane must fermentation for bioethanol production: does quorum sensing play a role? Crit Rev Biotechnol 2018;38(2):231–44.

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

477

[25] Rahman FA, Aziz MMA, Saidur R, Bakar WAWA, Hainin M, Putrajaya R, et al. Pollution to solution: capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2017;71:112–26. [26] Alavijeh MK, Yaghmaei S. Biochemical production of bioenergy from agricultural crops and residue in Iran. Waste Manag 2016;52:375–94. [27] Herrmann R, Jumbe C, Bruentrup M, Osabuohien E. Competition between biofuel feedstock and food production: empirical evidence from sugarcane outgrower settings in Malawi. Biomass Bioenergy 2018;114:100–11. [28] Favretto N, Stringer LC, Buckeridge MS, Afionis S. Policy and diplomacy in the production of second generation ethanol in Brazil: International relations with the EU, the USA and Africa. In: Advances of basic science for second generation bioethanol from sugarcane. Springer; 2017. p. 197–212. [29] Kumar R, Gakkhar R. Influence of nozzle opening pressure on combustion, performance and emission analysis of waste cooking oil biodiesel fuelled diesel engine. Int J Renewable Energy Technol 2018;9(1–2):244–59. [30] Azad AK, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, Sharma SC, Bhuiya MMK, Mofijur M. A review on socio-economic aspects of sustainable biofuels. Int J Global Warm 2016;10(1–3):32–54. [31] Nanda S, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, Kozinski JA. An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2015;50:925–41. [32] Azad AK, Rasul M, Giannangelo B, Islam R. Comparative study of diesel engine performance and emission with soybean and waste oil biodiesel fuels. Int J Automot Mech Eng 2015;12:2866. [33] Bhuiya M, Rasul M, Khan M, Ashwath N, Azad A. Prospects of 2nd generation biodiesel as a sustainable fuel—part: 1 selection of feedstocks, oil extraction techniques and conversion technologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016;55:1109–28. [34] Bailis P, Fekete A, Ghodsi A, Hellerstein JM, Stoica I. Scalable atomic visibility with RAMP transactions. ACM Trans Database Syst 2016;41(3):15. [35] Chattopadhyaya S. Social life in ancient India (In the background of the YajnavalkyaSmriti). Academic Publishers; 2018 (1965). [36] Arshad M, Khan Z, Shah F, Rajoka M. Optimization of process variables for minimization of byproduct formation during fermentation of blackstrap molasses to ethanol at industrial scale. Lett Appl Microbiol 2008;47(5):410–4. [37] Shin YS, Choi HI, Choi JW, Lee JS, Sung YJ, Sim SJ. Multilateral approach on enhancing economic viability of lipid production from microalgae: a review. Bioresour Technol 2018;258:335–44. [38] Gude VG. Green chemistry for sustainable biofuel production. CRC Press; 2018. [39] Demirbas A. Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Appl Energy 2011;88(1):17–28. [40] Vancoillie J, Demuynck J, Sileghem L, Van De Ginste M, Verhelst S. Comparison of the renewable transportation fuels, hydrogen and methanol formed from hydrogen, with gasoline–engine efficiency study. Int J Hydrog Energy 2012;37(12):9914–24. [41] Hotelling H. The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 1931;39(2):137–75. [42] Smith JL. World oil: market or mayhem? J Econ Perspect 2009;23(3):145–64. [43] Borenstein S, Bushnell J. The US electricity industry after 20 years of restructuring. Annu Rev Econ 2015;7(1):437–63. [44] Rajagopal D, Zilberman D. Environmental, economic and policy aspects of biofuels. Found Trends Microecono 2008;4(5):353–468. [45] Maso M. Energy harvesting oriented transceiver design for 5G networks. In: Energy management in wireless cellular and ad-hoc networks. Springer; 2016. p. 67–95. [46] Tsui KK. More oil, less democracy: evidence from worldwide crude oil discoveries. Econ J 2011;121(551):89–115.

478

Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

[47] Lapan H, Moschini G. Second-best biofuel policies and the welfare effects of quantity mandates and subsidies. J Environ Econ Manag 2012;63(2):224–41. [48] Aguilera RF, Eggert RG, Lagos CCG, Tilton JE. Depletion and the future availability of petroleum resources. Energy J 2009;141–74. [49] Kretschmer B, Peterson S. Integrating bioenergy into computable general equilibrium models—a survey. Energy Econ 2010;32(3):673–86. [50] Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008;319(5867):1238–40. [51] Zhang Y, Dube M, McLean D, Kates M. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 2. Economic assessment and sensitivity analysis. Bioresour Technol 2003;90(3):229–40. [52] Arshad M. Bioethanol: a sustainable and environment friendly solution for Pakistan. A Scientific J COMSATS–Sci Vision 2010;2011:16–7. [53] Arshad M, Ahmed S. Cogeneration through bagasse: a renewable strategy to meet the future energy needs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016;54:732–7. [54] Arshad M, Abbas M. Future biofuel production and water usage. In: Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production. Springer; 2018. p. 107–21. [55] Emmett RS, Nye DE. The environmental humanities: A critical introduction. MIT Press; 2017. [56] Dumortier J, Hayes DJ, Carriquiry M, Dong F, Du X, Elobeid A, et al. Sensitivity of carbon emission estimates from indirect land-use change. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 2011; 33(3):428–48. [57] Arshad M, Abbas M. Water sustainability issues in biofuel production. In: Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production. Springer; 2018. p. 55–76. [58] Arshad M. Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production: Aquatic contamination and climate change. Springer; 2017. [59] Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH. Long-term bioethanol system and its implications on GHG emissions: a case study of Thailand. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45(11):4920–8. [60] Arshad M. Clean and sustainable energy technologies. In: Clean energy for sustainable development. Elsevier; 2017. p. 73–89. [61] Kim H, Moschini G. The dynamics of supply: US corn and soybeans in the biofuel era. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University; 2018. [62] Athar M, Back JH, Kopelovich L, Bickers DR, Kim AL. Multiple molecular targets of resveratrol: anti-carcinogenic mechanisms. Arch Biochem Biophys 2009;486(2):95–102. [63] Geada P, Vasconcelos V, Vicente A, Fernandes B. Microalgal biomass cultivation. In: Algal green chemistry. Elsevier; 2017. p. 257–84. [64] Kumar A, Sharma S. Potential nonedible oil resources as biodiesel feedstock: an Indian perspective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2011;15(4):1791–800. [65] De Fraiture C, Giordano M, Liao Y. Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy 2008;10(S1):67–81. [66] Chum HL, Warner E, Seabra JE, Macedo IC. A comparison of commercial ethanol production systems from Brazilian sugarcane and US corn. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2014; 8(2):205–23. [67] Hur J, Kong DS. Use of synchronous fluorescence spectra to estimate biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of urban rivers affected by treated sewage. Environ Technol 2008; 29(4):435–44. [68] Curran SJ, Kanekar N, Darling J. Measuring changes in the fundamental constants with redshifted radio absorption lines. New Astron Rev 2004;48(11):1095–105.

Ecofuel future prospect and community impact

479

[69] Herkenhoff L. A profile of the oil and gas industry: Resources, market forces, geopolitics, and technology. Business Expert Press; 2018. [70] Fischer AH, Jacobson KA, Rose J, Zeller R. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2008;2008(5). pdb. prot4986. [71] Bonifas KD, Walters DT, Cassman KG, Lindquist JL. Nitrogen supply affects root: shoot ratio in corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 2005;53(5):670–5. [72] Doornbosch R, Steenblik R. Biofuels: is the cure worse than the disease? Rev Virt Redesma 2008;2:63. [73] Arshad M, Zia MA, Shah FA, Ahmad M. An overview of biofuel. In: Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production. Springer; 2018. p. 1–37. [74] Demirbas A. New liquid biofuels from vegetable oils via catalytic pyrolysis. Energ Educ Sci Technol 2008;21(1-2):1–59. [75] Runge CF, Senauer B. How biofuels could starve the poor. Foreign Affairs; 2007. p. 41–53. [76] Arshad M, Hussain T, Iqbal M, Abbas M. Enhanced ethanol production at commercial scale from molasses using high gravity technology by mutant S. cerevisiae. Braz J Microbiol 2017;48(3):403–9. [77] Duer H, Christensen PO. Socio-economic aspects of different biofuel development pathways. Biomass Bioenergy 2010;34(2):237–43. [78] Maxwell S, Fernando A. Cash crops in developing countries: the issues, the facts, the policies. World Dev 1989;17(11):1677–708. [79] Zarrilli S, editor. The emerging biofuels market: Regulatory, trade and development implications. Geneva: UNCTAD—United Nations Conference on Trade and Development; 2006. [80] Ma F, Hanna MA. Biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour Technol 1999;70(1):1–15. [81] Balat M, Balat H. A critical review of bio-diesel as a vehicular fuel. Energy Convers Manag 2008;49(10):2727–41. [82] Bano I, Arshad M. Impact of biofuel’s production on ground water. In: Perspectives on water usage for biofuels production. Springer; 2018. p. 77–96.