- Email: [email protected]
β phase boundaries and mechanical characterization of Mg-Sc binary alloys” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 670 (2016) 335–341]
Materials Science & Engineering A 674 (2016) 713
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials Science & Engineering A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/msea
Erratum
Erratum to “Determination of ɑ/β phase boundaries and mechanical characterization of Mg-Sc binary alloys” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 670 (2016) 335–341] Yukiko Ogawa, Daisuke Ando, Yuji Sutou, Kyosuke Yoshimi, Junichi Koike Department of Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6-11, Aoba-yama, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
The publisher regrets that some of the Author’s requested amendments were not applied. These were as follows:
On page 135, Introduction, the sentence in the second column
should read as follows: Meanwhile, there are a few reports on mechanical properties of Sc-added Mg alloys with single α phase [11–13]. Very recently, the present authors have found that Mg-Sc alloy with a β phase shows significant age hardening due to the formation of very fine α precipitates in β matrix [14]. On page 136, Section 2, the sentence should read as follows: The obtained diffusion couples were annealed at 773, 823 and 873 K for 96, 72 and 72 h, respectively, in an Ar atmosphere. On page 136, Section 2, the sentence should read as follows: The Mg-20 at% Sc alloy ingot melted in a high frequency induction furnace was hot rolled at 873 K and then cold rolled until a thickness of about 0.7 mm with annealing at 873 K. Table 1 show appears as follows: Temperature Time (K)
Diffusion couple Equilibrated al- Twoloy method phase
Singlephase
773 823 873 773 823 873 953 963
96 h 72 h 72 h 96 h 72 h 24 h 24 h 30 min
Composition of Sc (at%)
α
β
19.5 18.6 16.6 20.5 18.4 16.3 13.5 –
24.7 22.8 21.6 26.5 24.5 22.0 17.6 19.4
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.028 E-mail address: [email protected] (Y. Sutou). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.016 0921-5093/
Page 340, Section 3.3, the sentence should read as follows: Therefore, the specific strength is also higher than the conventional high strength alloys, such as AZ91, ZK60, etc. [10]. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials Science & Engineering A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/msea
Erratum
Erratum to “Determination of ɑ/β phase boundaries and mechanical characterization of Mg-Sc binary alloys” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 670 (2016) 335–341] Yukiko Ogawa, Daisuke Ando, Yuji Sutou, Kyosuke Yoshimi, Junichi Koike Department of Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6-11, Aoba-yama, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
The publisher regrets that some of the Author’s requested amendments were not applied. These were as follows:
On page 135, Introduction, the sentence in the second column
should read as follows: Meanwhile, there are a few reports on mechanical properties of Sc-added Mg alloys with single α phase [11–13]. Very recently, the present authors have found that Mg-Sc alloy with a β phase shows significant age hardening due to the formation of very fine α precipitates in β matrix [14]. On page 136, Section 2, the sentence should read as follows: The obtained diffusion couples were annealed at 773, 823 and 873 K for 96, 72 and 72 h, respectively, in an Ar atmosphere. On page 136, Section 2, the sentence should read as follows: The Mg-20 at% Sc alloy ingot melted in a high frequency induction furnace was hot rolled at 873 K and then cold rolled until a thickness of about 0.7 mm with annealing at 873 K. Table 1 show appears as follows: Temperature Time (K)
Diffusion couple Equilibrated al- Twoloy method phase
Singlephase
773 823 873 773 823 873 953 963
96 h 72 h 72 h 96 h 72 h 24 h 24 h 30 min
Composition of Sc (at%)
α
β
19.5 18.6 16.6 20.5 18.4 16.3 13.5 –
24.7 22.8 21.6 26.5 24.5 22.0 17.6 19.4
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.028 E-mail address: [email protected] (Y. Sutou). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.016 0921-5093/
Page 340, Section 3.3, the sentence should read as follows: Therefore, the specific strength is also higher than the conventional high strength alloys, such as AZ91, ZK60, etc. [10]. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.