Vol. 57, No.4,
1974
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
FLAVIN BINDING BY BACTERIAL AFFINITY
CHROMATOGRAPHY OF BACTERIAL
$
C. A. Waters+, J. R. Murphy
The Biological
Laboratories,
Cambridge,
Received
LUCIFERASE:
March
LUCIFERASE
, and J. W. Hastings
Harvard
Massachusetts
University,
02138
11,1974
Immobilized FMN covalently attached to Sepharose-6Bhexanoate binds bacterial luciferase. Immobilized flavin is also effective in its reduced form as a substrate in the light emitting reaction catalyzed by luciferase. Bioluminescence and aldehyde
oxygen
as substrates
(1,2,3).
is much lower constant
substrate
that
of the
with
binds
M-l)
bound
is
attachment luciferase.
in the
form
enough
utilizes
oxidation
of oxidized
reduced high
luciferase
function
affinity
FMN would
of Mosbach
FMN by covalent it
in a mixed the
than
of the procedure
by bacterial
Although
(K = 4 x lo3
chromatography
that
catalyzed
to suggest
be successful.
and co-workers
(7),
reduced
form it
luciferase
its
association
that
affinity
Using we have
to a Sepharose-GB-hexanoate In its
by molecular
FMN for
(4,5,6),
a modification immobilized
matrix is
FMNH2
effective
and found as a
reaction.
MATERIALS: Sepharose 6B was purchased as the pre-swollen gel from Pharmacia Fine Chemicals. FMN, riboflavin and cytochrome c were obtained from Sigma, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and 6-aminohexanoic acid from Aldrich, bovine serum albmin cyanogen bromide (CNBr) from Eastman, crystallized (BSA) from Miles Laboratories and ovalbumin from Worthington. 5'Phosphopentyl flavin, Li salt, was a gift of Drs. D.B. McCormick and M.N. Kazarinoff. The two luciferases used in these studies, designated as Pf and MAV, were isolated frcun two species of luminous bacteria assigned by Reichelt and Baumann (8) to Photobaeterim fischeri (Pf, ATCC 7744) and Beneckea harveyi (MAV, Strain 392).
t
Fellow, National Institutes of Health ++ Predoctoral Department of Microbiology and Molecular Present Address: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Copyright 0 I974 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in rrny form reserved.
1152
Genetics,
Vol. 57, No. 4, 1974
BIOCHEMICAL
METHODS AND RESULTS: --washed
with
0.1 M
in the
same buffer,
initiated
by the
formamide,
NaHCO
borate
stirred
for
500-ml
aside
preservative,
to 4o and adjusted
to pH 11.
was maintained
was filtered
activated
buffer,
pH 8.5,
18 hours
(v/v).
distilled
with
resuspended Activation
After
cold
was resuspended containing
at 4O.
The gel
After
followed
was
30 minutes
0.2 M sodium
was then
40 ml of 0.2 M
washed
pH 8.5,
by extensive the gel
A solution
was added
and the
acid
sequentially
and with
0.1 M NaHC03, 0.01
washing
with
was resuspended
q FMN and transferred
flask.
Erlenmeyer
24 ml pyridine
0.4
in
2.6 g 6-aminohexanoic
buffer,
filtration
H20 containing
shielded
at pH 11.
and washed
gel
0.5 M NaCl and H20,
pyridine
6B was
of 3 q CNBr in 6 ml N,N'-dimethyl-
each of 0.2 M sodilmn borate
HCl,
in
the
addition
slurry
of 30 ml of Sepharose
pH 0.5.
The washed, sodium
volume
to remove
dropwise
and the
buffer,
3
cooled
at 4 O, the material borate
A settled
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
M
80% aqueous in 6 ml
to a 250-ml
liqht-
of 10 q dicyclohexyl-carbodiimide slurry
gently
agitated
at 37O for
4 days. In order
to remove byproducts
was sequentially 95% ethanol,
washed H20,
with
and unbound
95% ethanol,
10q3 M HCl,
cold
and stored absorbance
of the acid
indicated
that
gel
was stable
for
hydrolysates
2.4 pmoles at least
Riboflavin-Sepharose procedure, gel
with
utilizing
but
only
about
the hexacarbon FMN.
EMN derivative a 5'-phosphopentyl
Attempts in which group
H20, warm
(45')
1-butanol,
0.1 M NaHCO 0.5 M NaCl and H20 3'
in 0.2% NaN 3 at 4 0 in. the
gels
FMN, the FMN-Sepharose
dark of the
of FMN were
until
used.
The 450 nm
flavin-substituted bound
per
Sepharose
ml of gel.
The
one year. conjugates
were
prepared
0.1 pmoles
were
bound
spacer
alone
were
the
link
unsuccessful.
1153
side It
chain
is possible
Control
the steps
5'-phosphopentyl
5'-phosphoribityl
same
per ml of gel.
was made by omitting
to covalently the
using
is
flavin,
an
replaced
by
that
the
Vol. 57, No. 4, 1974
coupling
BIOCHEMICAL
reaction
esterification
between
group
function
as an effective
mixed
side
using
This
equilibrated
was applied
and the
to baseline.
Bound
of either
column
by the method
Luciferase activity initiating
using
the
reduced by the
the
together injection
reaction
Luciferase
activity
is
standard
of Hastings
of FMN.
the
A),
sample
the A2So returned the
was determined
in
concentration
pattern using
with
a Cary Model
at O" with cell
a Radiometer
extracts
were
by Gunsalus-Miguel decanal
in which
with
and Weber
In an experiment
to as buffer The protein
A until
catalytically
Ill),
expressed
elution
cm)
(9).
with
Both MAV and Pf luciferases illustrates
x 2.6
M phosphate,
NaCl.
was measured
by the
of aldehyde
in
The FMN-Sepharose
by increasing
at 21' 2 2' with
a vial
(0.9
referred
buffer
as described
assay in
of a
yield
(0.02
without
ml)
of Lowry
"dithionite"
may
lower
colons
concentrations
was measured
group
same buffer. (1.2
was purified
the
(DTT),
was eluted
Protein
terminal
Michelson,
of 18 ml/b.
with
Conductivity
meter.
the
(A.M.
2 M NaCl in buffer
fraction
15 spectrophotometer.
either
rate
same buffer
luciferase
The A20o of each
determined
at 4O in
developed
NaCl or FMN in the
conductivity
out
with
in the
with
the production
for
5 x 10 -4 M dithiothreitol
pH 7, containing and then
through
intermediate
of 2 ml at a flow
by washing
group
same treatment.
was carried
a bed volume
was regenerated
agent
may account
by the
involves
The FMN phosphate
anhydride
riboflavin
Chromatography
hydroxyl
spacer.
acylating
ccmnnunication).
immobilizing
Sepharose-hexanoate
chain
of the hexanoate
phosphate-carboxylate
personal
It's
FMN and the
of a ribityl
carboxyl
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
addition excess
as the reduced
the
flavin
of solid oxygen
in quantassec
et al.
(10).
aldehyde, FMWH2 (lo),
and luciferase dithionite,
to initiate -IL (qssec-'
or are
followed the
1, using
reaction. the
(12). bind
to FMN-Sepharose.
of MAV luciferase
using
the
elution
Pf enzyme the
1154
Fig.
la
a linear pattern
gradient was
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 57, No. 4, 1974
similar,
except
been
of the fact
estimated that
to their
interaction with
that
slightly
the
NaCl,
MAV).
the binding
to be considerably
indicate
eluted
the Pf eluted
to 3 x 10 -3 M FMN, for
Pf compared in view
that
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
affinity
This
of free
is
the FMN ligand.
as shown in Fig.
lb for
FMN for
M
somewhat
surprising
FMN to Pf luciferase
(2 to 20 times)
of luciferases
with
-3 (5 x 10
later
for
weaker
this
The bound
gel
(5). is
Pf enzyme.
This
not
enzymes With
has may
due solely can also
be
MAV, the
0.4
03
02 01 0
FMN-Sepharose chromatography of MAV luciferase using a gradient Figure la. of FMN for elution MAV luciferase (4 m ) in 0.25 ml of buffer A, having a to a column prespecific activity of 1.4 x 1014 q.sec- 4 =mg-1, was applied Pf luciferase. equilibrated with the same buffer and eLuted with FMN. lb. The sample (3 mg) in 0.3 ml of buffer A, having a specifz activity of 1.2 x 1014 qssec-l*mg-l, was applied to a column pre-equilibrated in the same buffer and eluted with a linear NaCl gradient as shown (dashed line). x) and luciferase activities (0) are Absorbances at 280 nm (dotted line, plotted for each fraction. Specific activity of a pool of fractions 21-30 was 1.5 x 1014 q*secml-mgwl. Center ordinate scale, applicable to solid lines in both panels, luciferase activity in units of q.sec-l*ml-1-1013 (one division equals one unit).
activity
eluted
slightly
earlier
luciferases
do not bind
FMN; of the
4 x 10 14 activity
column, buffer
in the NaCl gradient
appreciably
90% of the Pf activity
to the
units
than
did
Pf.
Sepharose-hexanoate
of each enzyme loaded
and 98% of the MAV activity
The
lacking onto
such a control
eluted
in the
wash. Luciferase
Purified
can also
MAV luciferase
be separated was mixed
from
with
a mixture
BSA, cytochrome
1155
of non-flavoproteins. c and ovalbumin,
Vol. 57, No. 4, 1974
applied
BIOCHEMICAL
to the FMN-Sepharose
proteins
came through
characteristic
Crude
cell
extracts
gel
Luciferase
qsec
9
12
-1
q*sec
, similar
volume
colon,
0.35
This
with
buffer, enzyme
colan.
pH 7, (specific
on a Sepharose-
to the hexacarbon
in the buffer
and eluted
this
on DEAE-Cellulose.
was chromatographed bind
material.
using
M phosphate A.
at its
of eluted
starting
achieved
of buffer
eluted
activity
batch-adsorbed
which
came through
luciferase
to the
was
with
*rng-l)
the
The non-flavo-
The specific
MAV were
to remove proteins
the FMN-Sepharose
-1
of luciferase
a large
activity
wash while
was eluted
against
of 8 x 10
and chrcmatographed.
gradient.
-1
of strain
activity
and dialyzed
hexanoate
14
purification
The luciferase
activity
in the
was 1 x 10
A partial
column
in the buffer
position
luciferase
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
spacer.
wash and was applied
a linear
NaCl gradient
to (Fig.
1.l 0.5 04
:
6
12
16
40
Ci I:
0.3
x
‘.I /’ 9. ‘.: ,,,’
44
48
FRAC T/O/V
52
I’ /’
0.2
1
56
2).
&
12.0 9.6 6
u
k
-z. F ‘: 4.6 c, $1 $ 1: z 7.2
60
NUMBER
purified luciferase was applied to the FMN-Sepharose Figure 2. Partially Some contaminating proteins came through in the wash (tubes 8-12). column. as well as scnne other unidentified proteins, was eluted with NaCl. Luciferase,
The pooled Since
luciferase
highly
purified
had a specific
activity
MAV luciferase
has a specific
1.4 x 1014 q-set-l-mg-l, Sepharose
step
Immobilized dithionite,
is
the MAV luciferase
estimated
to be about
FMN, reduced
is effective
either
of 6 x 10
activity
13 qssec -1 *mg -1 .
activity after
with
in
luminescence
1156
the FMN-
40% pure.
catalytically
as a substrate
of about
the
H2 or with reaction,
Vol.
57, No,
BIOCHEMICAL
4, f 974
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
60
40
20
0
6
12
I6
24
30
0
3
6
9
12
TIME fSEC0ND.S~ Figure 3. The kinetics of the reaction, measured by the time course of the bioluminescence, are the same with immobilized FMNH2 (x1 as with soluble FMNH (o), both with dodecanal (left) and decanal (right). Curves for reac 6 ions with soluble and insoluble F$@IH are normalized to the maximum initial intensities in each case. Note t 8 at the turnover time is quite different with the different aldehydes. Apparent first order rate constants for decay of luminescence: decanal = 0.37 set"; dodecanal, 0.056 set-l. M&V luciferase, 250C.
in
spite
in
less
of the than
2% of that the
that
one second with
turnover
same as that unexpected
fact
free for
for
soluble
(13)
and also
time
substantially.
(13).
competitive
the chain
because
the reaction
length
that
with
is only
of immobilization. by insoluble decanal
substitutions
of the
of FMNH2 occurs
maximum rate
initiated
FMNH2, both
of the fact
autoxidation
The apparent
FMNH2, perhaps
time
in view
the
aldehyde
about But
FMNH2 is
the
and dodecanal
(Fig.
on the
molecule
(14),
flavin
may alter
31,
turnover
was supported in part by National Science ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This research Foundation Grant GB 31977X. The authors wish to thank Drs. T. 0. Baldwin, S.-C. Tu, and K. C. Backman for their critical reading of this manuscript We are also indebted to Ann Gunsalus-Miguel and nmerous discussions. for her luciferase preparations. REFERENCES 1. 2.
Hastings, J.W. (1968) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 37, 597-630. Hastings, J-W., Ebexhard, A-,-Baldwin, T-O., Nicoli, M-Z., Cline, Nealson, K.H. (1973) in Chemiluminescence and BiolUninescence
1157
T.W.,
Vol. 57, No. 4, 1974
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(M.J. Cormier, D.M. Hercules, J. Lee eds.) pp. 369-380, Plenm Publishing Co., New York. G.A., Bogacki, I.G., and Meighen, E.A. (1973) Dunn, D.K., Michaliszyn, Biochem. 12, 4911-4918. Gibson, Q.H., Hastings, J.W., Weber, G., Duane, W., and Massa J. (1966) in --Flavins and Flavoproteins (E.C. Slater ed.) pp. 341-359, Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam. Baldwin, T.O. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., in press. Nicoli, M.Z. (1972) Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Mosbach, K., Guilford, H., Ohlsson, R., and Scott, M. (1972) Biochem. J. 127, 625-631. Reichelt, J.L., and Baumann, P. (1973) Arch. Mikrobiol. 2, 283-330. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-276. Gunsalus-Miguel, A., Meighen, E.A., Nicoli, M-Z., Nealson, K-H., and Hastings, J.W. (1972) J. Biol. Chem. 247, 398-404. Meighen, E.A., and Hastings, J.W. (1971) J. Biol. them. 246, 7666-7674. Hastings, J.W., and Weber, G. (1963) J. Opt. Sot. Am. 53, 1410-1415. Gibson, Q.H., and Hastings, J.W. (1962) Biochem. J. 83, 368-377. J.W. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 2572-2576. Mitchell, G.W., and Hastings, Hastings, J.W., Spudich, J.A., and Malnic, G. (1963) J. BE. Chem. 238, 3100-3105.
1158