Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219 – 231
Great Britain and Northern Ireland Simon Brackenbury *, Simon de Montfalcon, Kate Evans, Martina Fitzgerald, Nancy Hamilton Ford Collection of British Official Publications, Hartley Library, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK Received 21 September 2002; accepted 26 May 2003
Broad themes reflected in the documents selected for inclusion in this year’s column include, firstly, documents concerning a wide range of events, accidents, scandals, and failures of public policy and, secondly, plans for, and outcomes of, various reforms of the machinery of government. All bar two of the documents are available free of charge in full text on the Web, in addition to the hardcopy version (which is priced in the majority of cases). Innovations in government and parliamentary websites this year include: ‘‘Webcast’’ broadcasts from House of Commons; House of Lords; Westminster Hall and Select Committees, which are now available at hhttp://parliamentlive.tvi, and for the Scottish Parliament at hhttp://scottishparliamentlive.comi; ‘‘policyhub’’ hhttp://www.policyhub.cmps.gov.uki, which ‘‘aims to be the first port of call for promoting improvements in policy making and delivery’’; and Parliamentary Online Indexing Service (POLIS) hhttp://www.polis.parliament. uki, which offers an index to proceedings in both Houses of the Westminster Parliament and includes the full text of Early Day Motions since May 1997. The main entry point into the .gov.uk Internet domain remains ‘‘UKOnline’’ hhttp://www. ukonline.gov.uki, which includes links to over 1000 UK government and public service websites, indexing over 1.5 million Web pages from over 850 government bodies, and it is envisaged that this will be the main point of access to an ambitious government target that ‘‘by 2005 you will be able to do all your business with government electronically.’’ There is still some way to go. At present, the services that are available via UKOnline are a somewhat eclectic mix: applying for a passport; buying a TV license; finding local child care; nominating someone for an honour; booking a driving theory test; making claims to recover debts; getting a fishing license; and notifying a change of address. Underpinning the e-government agenda are emerging technical standards, which are summarised on the new ‘‘GovTalk’’ website, which * Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-1703-592-370; fax: +44-1703-593-007. E-mail address:
[email protected] (S. Brackenbury). 1352-0237/02/$ – see front matter D 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1352-0237(03)00023-6
220
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
has the aim of ‘‘setting standards for seamless electronic government’’ the main manifestation of which being the section on e-government interoperability (with documents relating to, and repositories for, XML schemas; examples of best practice; case studies; toolkits). For researchers who are interested in notable British Official Publications in the longer term, British Official Publications Collaborative Reader Information Service (BOPCRIS hhttp://www.bopcris.ac.uki is in the process of moving from a Web-based finding tool to a full-text (searchable at the individual keyword level) digital library for over 23,000 British Official Publications from 1688 to 1995 thanks to funding received by the Ford Collection of British Official Publications from the New Opportunities Fund hhttp://www.nof.org.uki (one of the UK National Lottery’s distributors for good causes). Features include: abstracts; detailed cataloguing of statistical tables, diagrams, and maps; a national directory of collection strengths and (from December 2002) up to 750,000 pages of text available as images and searchable text to form a full-text digital library. A basic searchable catalogue and full-text digital library service will be developed between now and February 2005 for up to 13,700 British Parliamentary Papers relating to Ireland from 1801 to 1922 through the Enhanced Parliamentary Papers on Ireland (EPPI, 1801–1922) website, see hhttp://www. eppi.ac.uki, again, thanks to funding received by the Ford Collection of British Official Publications at the University of Southampton, this time from the Arts and Humanities Research Board hhttp://www.ahrb.ac.uki. 387 Restrictions on the Initiation of Parliamentary Proceedings: a Consultation Paper. Fourth report by House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges, Sir George Younge (Chairman). London: TSO, December 2001. 10p. With proc. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002: HC 478) ISBN 0-215-00104-4; £4.50. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ cm200102/cmselect/cmstnprv/478/47802.htmi.] Summarises the ‘‘advocacy rule’’ governing Members’ initiation of any proceedings relating to areas in which the Member might expect pecuniary benefit or has a vested interest, and Members’ receiving money for speaking, voting, or taking any other form of action in the House. Explores the Neill Committee’s concerns that this rule inhibited informed debate by knowledgeable MPs, and needed revision. The Paper invites Members’ views on options relaxing current guidelines, but recommends the adoption of a ‘‘disproportionate advancement’’ rule. This requires the Commissioner to assess whether the conferrable benefit to a body in which the Member had a registrable or declarable interest was disproportionate to that of a wider group, which might benefit by his advocacy within the House. The Committee notes that should the current rules be relaxed, it would regard a Member’s failure to register or declare an interest relevant to proceedings of his initiation as a serious breach of the rules of the House. 388 Special Advisers: Boon or Bane: the Government Response to the Public Administration Select Committee’s Fourth Report of Session 2000–01, Tony Wright (Chairman). London: TSO, December 2001. 20p. With app., proc. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 463)
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
221
ISBN 0-215-00094-3. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www. parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmpubadm/463/46303.htmi.] Third report from the Public Administration Select Committee. Discusses the role of Minister’s special advisers (counselling on the political implications of policy), in the light of their increasing importance, enhanced role, and exemption from the normal Civil Service rules of appointment. The Committee welcomes the Code of Conduct for Special Advisers contained in the Paper and looks forward to a consultation document on this and civil service legislation. The report also addresses funding parliamentary advice: drawing similarities between money spent on special advisers, and money given to opposition parties for the conduct of parliamentary business (Short Money). It advises greater transparency in the appointment process, particularly because appointees have assumed senior positions in the machinery of government. The Committee also examines the blurring of responsibility brought about by the Government’s creation of the Policy Directorate in which special advisers work closely with civil service secretaries. The report includes the Government Memorandum with its response to the Committee’s recommendations and endorsements within the fourth report. 389 Force for Change: Central Government Intervention in Failing Local Government Services. London: Audit Commission, 2002. 68p. With app., ftn., introd., tabs. Audit Commission Publications. Stock code: LNR2727; £25.00. [Free copy available from the Audit Commission website hhttp://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/publications/pdf/intervention.pdfi.] Study focussing on the Government’s policy of intervention in failing public services at a local level. The Audit Commission, with other inspectorates and Government departments, had been charged with identifying poor-performing councils, and to intervene where necessary. The report defines the Commission’s understanding of ‘‘intervention,’’ examines its nature, and discusses the following: Does intervention tackle failure? What causes service failure? How does intervention work? How can intervention be improved? Additionally, the question of the future of intervention is included. These assess the policy’s apparent success in providing the foundation for improvement, the effect of poor leadership, and the need for intervention to ‘‘overcome denial, take action, and exit.’’ The report looks at the total number of interventions each year, from 1997 to 2001, and examines actions in education and social services. The Commission’s aim is to advise on future interventions, particularly in light of the proposed extension of governmental powers in areas of police and NHS. It makes fifteen recommendations, eight relating to Government, one for Government and national bodies, four for the Commission, other inspectorates and Government departments, and two for councils. 390 Government on the Web II, by House of Commons National Audit Office. London: TSO, April 2002. 86p. With summ., gloss., refs., tabs. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 764) ISBN None; £13.25. [Free copy available from the National Audit Office hhttp://www. nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102764.pdfi.] The Government’s commitment to the development of e-government and electronic services delivery had led to departments and agencies spending revenues on IT infrastructure,
222
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
websites, and Intranets. An additional £1 billion is to be invested over 3 years beginning April 2001 to increase central government organisations’ online accessibility. There were also moves to promote e-government among 388 local authorities, with the intention that all public services able to be transacted electronically should be available online for citizens and firms in 2005. The report addresses the changing context of electronic public services. It also assesses and offers conclusions and recommendations on: dealing with business—HM Customs and Excise; dealing with citizens and local authorities—the Department for Transport, local government, and the regions (DTLR); central policy on e-government issues. Particular attention is paid to UK online and open.gov.uk. Methodology, case study information, and central government organisations covered by the census of websites are in appendices. 391 The Cancellation of the Benefits Payment Card Project, House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts, Edward Leigh, and David Davis (Chairmen). London: TSO, November, 2001. 23p. With procs., mins., mems. apps. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 358; incorporating HC 282-i (2000-01)) ISBN 0-215-00065-X; £13.10. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/ cmselect/cmpubacc/358/35802.htmi.] In 1996, the Department of Social Security and Post Office Counters had granted a contract to Pathway for delivery of the Benefits Payment Card to replace the existing paperbased methods of paying social security benefits. It would also oversee the automation of post offices through which payments were made throughout Great Britain and Northern Ireland. There had been delays, and in May 1999, the Government decided to remove the payment card but continue with plans for automating the Post Office. The Comptroller and Auditor General reported that this cancellation costs the departments and the taxpayer over £1 billion in abortive costs and delayed reduction in benefits fraud. The report examines the project and alternative methods for paying benefits, the report on the 25 IT systems, and the Government’s response. It reaches three overall conclusions: (1) Risk assessment and management had been underestimated and dealt with inadequately. (2) Whilst project management improvements in PFI and IT by the Treasury, Central IT Unit, and the Office of Government Commerce might preclude similar failures, the DSS’s ability to deliver was doubted. (3) Prompt managerial action was needed to cancel failing projects. The Committee made a further eight more specific observations and recommendations on: lessons for future major IT projects; the outcome of the Benefit Payment Card project; and the development of new arrangements for paying benefits, particularly Automated Credit Transfer. 392 Report to Parliament on Library and Information Matters, by Department of Culture, Media and Sport (Museums, Libraries and Archives). London: TSO, May, 2001. 22p. (Departmental Publication) ISBN None; £4.95. Focuses on the Department’s key activities rather than the policy themes and takes the 1964 Public Libraries and Museum Act as its reference. Six sections look at standards and plans; information technology; Resource—the Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries; the
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
223
DCMS/Wolfson Public Libraries Challenge Fund; the British Library; and DCMS publications in the reporting period. It addresses monitoring the performance of public libraries, the Government’s responsibilities, and the new Public Library Standards that came into effect in April 2001. It reports on Annual Library Plans (ALPs) for library authorities, and the Department’s reluctance to intervene in decision making on details of service provided where statutory duties are met. The report notes the proposed incorporation of the Advisory Council on Libraries (ACL) within Resource. Information technology, with NOF funding, had been at the centre of several developments, including the Community Access to Lifelong Learning to support community-based ICT facilities. Resource had advised on the People’s Network, and this project had put libraries at the forefront of the Department’s social inclusion strategy, as had UK online. The report looks at developments in the British Library, particularly since its move to St. Pancras in 1998. It examines the Library’s new Co-operation and Partnership Programme and its commitment to ICT developments within the library. The Department is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of the British Library, the second part of which will be published in Spring 2001. 393 Firearms Law: Guidance to the Police, 2002, by Home Office. London: TSO. 204p. With apps. £9.95. [Free copy available from the Home Office website hhttp://www.homeoffice. gov.uk/pcrg/firearms/policeguide.pdf.i.] Major changes in legislation governing the possession and transfer of firearms had been made in the 10 years since the issue of the last Guidance. The document intends to provide straightforward guidelines through the legislation, to assist consistency of practice for police forces, and to provide a greater understanding of the Firearms Acts for firearms users. The report defines firearms and ammunition, looking at prohibited weapons and restricting the possession, handling, and distribution of these. It addresses applications for firearms certificates, exemptions, fitness, good reasons to possess firearms, permits, and registration of firearms dealers, security of firearms and ammunition, and the criminal use of firearms. It contains sections on the following: antique firearms and historic handguns; museum firearms licensing; rifle and muzzle-loading pistol clubs and cadet corps; and young persons. It addresses fees, notices and appeals, law enforcement, proof of fireams, and the surrender and disposal of firearms and ammunition. It also details the differences between Northern Ireland and Great Britain’s firearm control, and movements of firearms and ammunition between the two areas. The guidelines cover visitors’ permits, the import and export of firearms, and the 1991 EC directive on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons. 394 The House of Lords: Completing the Reform, by Her Majesty’s Government. London: TSO, November, 2001. 37p. With ann. (Command Paper; CM 5291) ISBN None. £8.25. [Free copy available from the Lord Chancellor’s Department website hhttp://www.lcd.gov.uk/ constitution/holref/holreform.htpi.] White Paper building upon the independent Royal Commission Report, ‘‘A House for the Future,’’ Cm 4534 (January 2000), and reform debates in both Houses. It proposes to remove
224
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
hereditary interests completely from the second chamber, increase representation of women and ethnic minorities, establish a statutory Appointments Commission to appoint independent members, and assure the integrity of political parties’ nominees. The report emphasises the preeminence of the House of Commons, explores the role and powers of the House of Lords, and makes a number of recommendations on the future composition of the House. It should number 600 members: 120 independent members uncommitted to any political affiliation, to be appointed by the Appointments Commission, 120 directly elected Members, 16 Bishops, at least 12 Law Lords, and 332 nominated political members, the Appointments Commission to attribute numbers to each party. The elected sector should ensure regional representation, and votes cast in the preceding General Election should be reflected in the representation of political parties in the Lords when possible. Other issues addressed include the elected representation of the nations and regions and the basis of the constituencies, the timing of elections, terms and conditions of membership, the role of the peerage, judicial Members of the House, and religious representation. 395 British–US Relations: Second Report, by House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, Donald Anderson (Chairman). London: TSO, December 2001. 154p. With ftn., introd., ann., apps. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 327) ISBN 0-215-00091-9; £16.50. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ cm200102/cmselect/cmfaff/327/32702.htmi.] First major inquiry of the Committee following the June 2001 general election. There have been good relations between the UK and the USA for the past 60 years, often referred to as the ‘‘special relationship.’’ Although this is valued by the UK as its most important relationship with another state, the report is mainly a result of UK concerns over the shift in US foreign policy and the terms of reference were, ‘‘to inquire into relations between the United Kingdom and the United States, and the implications of US foreign policy for United Kingdom interests.’’ Although the issues in this report were high on the agenda prior to the terrorist events of 11 September, their emphasis has now changed, and the impact of these events is now reflected in the report. Topics covered by the report include the United Nations, current US missile defence, arms control, NATO, the European Union, the Kyoto Protocol, and regional conflicts such as the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and Kashmir. Includes evidence given over 2 days by the London School of Economics, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Deputy Under-Secretary of State, and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Of related interest: ‘‘British–US Relations: Response of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs’’ (HMSO, 2002. 9p. (Command Paper Cm 5372) ISBN 0-10-153722-0); £4.00. [Free copy available at the FCO website hhttp://files.fco.gov. uk/fac/2feb02.pdfi.]) 396 Passenger Rail Franchising and the Future of Railway Infrastructure: First Report of Session 2001–02: Volume I: Report and Proceedings of the Committee, by House of Commons Transport, Local Government and the Regions Committee, Andrew F Bennett
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
225
(Chairman) or Gwyneth Dunwoody (Chairman). London: TSO, January 2002. 60p. With ftn., introd., annex., apps. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 239-I) ISBN 0-215-001435; £11.00. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmtlgr/239/23902.htmi.] After winning the 1997 general election, the Government’s proposals for railway improvement focused on the creation of the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA), new long-term franchises for passenger rail services, and the appointment of a new rail regulator with correspondingly rigorous regulatory regime for Railtrack. These, along with other transport policies in which the railways were to play a major part, have failed to produce the expected impetus to the rail network. This has been underlined by three major rail accidents and a subsequent lack of confidence in the general condition of the track and bed. As well as considering the question of rail franchising, the report includes further considerations that arose from Railtrack being placed in administration on 7 October 2001, covering the effect of the collapse of Railtrack on the Government’s franchising policy and how Railtrack’s successor would be structured financially as well as its relationship with other rail bodies and the Government. 397 Impact of Foot and Mouth Disease: First Report, House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, David Curry (Chairman). London: TSO, January 2002. 26p. With ftn., introd. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 323) ISBN 0-215-00131-1; £21.50. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmenvfru/323/32302.htmi.] In 2001, there was a major outbreak of foot and mouth disease that reached many regions of the UK. This report places emphasis on the evidence that it wished to place in the public domain to aid other inquiries. Key issues that have arisen from the evidence are considered in the report including the origin of the outbreak of the disease, the spread of the disease, the policy and practice of culling, and vaccination. Evidence given over 8 days by more that 20 bodies and individuals answering more than 850 questions. Also includes 18 diagrams illustrating aspects of the outbreak. 398 Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001, by Parliament. London: TSO, December 2001. 1p. (Public General Acts 2001; Chapter 23) ISBN 0-10-542301-7; £1.75. [Free copy available from the HMSO website hhttp://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/ 20010023.htmi.] ‘‘An Act to prohibit the placing in a woman of a human embryo which has been created otherwise than by fertilisation.’’ This emergency legislation was rushed through all its parliamentary stages in response to a loophole in UK law that would make cloning legal. Of related interest: ‘‘Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001: Explanatory Notes’’ (TSO, 2002. 3p. (Public General Acts Explanatory Notes; 2001 Chapter 23 EN) 0-10-562201-X); £2.00. [Free copy available at the HMSO website hhttp://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/en/2001en23. htmi.]
226
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
399 Inappropriate Adjustments to NHS Waiting List, by the National Audit Office. London: TSO, December 2001. 78p. With ftn., introd., annex., apps. (Departmental Publication) ISBN 0-10-291335-8; £8.25. [Free copy available from the NAO website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/ publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102221.pdfi.] Sets out the results of a National Audit Office (NAO) investigation into mismanagement of NHS waiting lists by nine NHS trusts: Barts and London; Guy’s and St. Thomas’; Plymouth Hospitals; Redbridge Health Care; Salford Royal Hospitals; South Warwickshire General Hospitals; Stoke Mandeville Hospital; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare; and University College London Hospitals. NAO findings include the following: that three of the NHS trusts had been adjusting their waiting lists for three or more years affecting nearly 6000 patients records; that adjustments varied significantly in their seriousness as did the impact on patients, resulting in some of them waiting longer for treatment; that several staff were suspended although some have been reemployed in the NHS; that there was an enquiry at all the trusts concerned, but they were generally insufficiently rigorous and the time taken for their completion was in most cases excessive. The NAO makes six main recommendations based on these findings. Of related interest: ‘‘Inpatient and Outpatient Waiting in the NHS’’ (TSO, 2001. 78p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 221) ISBN 0-10-291108-8); £11.50. [Free copy available at NAO website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/ 0102221.pdfi.]) 400 Complaints Against Mr. Keith Vaz: Fifth Report of Session 2001–02: Volume I, by House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges, Sir George Young (Chairman). London: TSO, February 2002. 342p. With proc., app., ann., ftn. (House of Commons Papers 2001– 2002; HC 605-I) ISBN 0-215-00158-3; £25.00. [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmstnprv/ 605/60502.htmi.] Lists and investigates complaints against Mr. Vaz’s financial relationships and allegations of misleading or obstructing investigations into these. The Committee also deals with suggestions of pressure and harassment by the member for Leicester East reported during the inquiry, and in its conclusions, it recommends that Mr. Vaz be suspended from the House of Commons for a month following serious breaches of the Code of Conduct and a contempt of the House. See also: ‘‘Complaints Against Mr. Keith Vaz: Fifth Report of Session 2001– 02: Volume II’’ (TSO, 2002. 146p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 605-II) ISBN 0-215-00159-1; £16.50). [Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp:// www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmstnprv/605/605ap02. htmi.] 401 Parliamentary Questions and Electronic Tabling of Questions and Motions, by House of Commons Procedure Committee, Nicholas Winterton (Chairman). London: TSO, March 2002. 15p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 622-I) ISBN 0-215-00231-8; £5.50.
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
227
[Free copy available from the UK Parliament website hhttp://www.parliament.the-stationeryoffice.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmproced/622/2021201.htmi.] Minutes of evidence given by Mr. Graham Allen MP, Mr. Norman Baker MP, Mr. Andrew Bennett MP, Mr. Tom Boswell MP, and Ms. Oona King MP on Tuesday 12 February 2002. They gave evidence to the Committee on their use of the Parliamentary question system and what they believe works well in the present system and what they think needs changing or adjusting. 402 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: Code of Practice on the Disclosure of Information. London: Inland Revenue, February 2002. 11p. With app., introd. (Departmental Publication). [Free copy available from the Inland Revenue website hhttp://www.inlandrevenue. gov.uk/pdfs/cop_at.htmi.] The purpose of the Code is explained in an introduction and further chapters detail the legal provisions, safeguards, and complaints handling guidance contained in the Code of Practice. Sections 19 and 20 of the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, which deals with the disclosure of information held by revenue departments and its interpretation is attached as Appendix 1, whilst Article 8 of Schedule 1, Human Rights Act 1998, is listed in Appendix 2. Appendices 3 and 4 restate data protection principles and statements. Of related interest: ‘‘Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: Explanatory Notes’’ (TSO, 2002. 61p. (Chapter 24, Public General Acts, 2001—explanatory notes series) ISBN 0-10-562401-2); £7.50. [Free copy available from the HMSO website hhttp://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/en/ 2001en24.htmi.]) 403 Holding to Account: the Review of Audit and Accountability for Central Government, report by Lord Sharman of Redlynch (Chairman). London: HM Treasury, February 2001. 62p. With ann., ftn., introd. (Departmental Publication). [Free copy available from the HM Treasury website hhttp://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/mediastore/otherfiles/Holding%20to%20 Account.pdfi.] The Review of Audit and Accountability was established to examine current audit and accountability arrangements for central government and to make recommendations. The report begins by listing the main recommendations for all central government bodies and follows on by examining what constitutes public money and what degree of accountability and audit is appropriate for it. Four annexes deal with the Review’s methodology and research, key developments in central government audit, and private sector governance in the UK, and detail the audit and accountability arrangements for central government departments. 404 The Southall and Ladbroke Grove Joint Inquiry into Train Protection Systems, by Professor John Uff and Lord Cullen. London: HSE Books, March 2001. 152p. With ann., introd., tab. (Departmental Publication) ISBN 0-7176-1998-2; £19.50. [Free copy available from the HSE website hhttp://www.hse.gov.uk/railway/spad/lgri1.pdfi.]
228
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
The report is divided into 12 chapters and considers train protection systems following the train collisions at Southall and Ladbroke Grove and makes 39 recommendations aimed at reducing the risk of incidents caused by signals passed at danger (SPADs). It also looks at the cost of safety and the current and future regulation needed for train protection. It examines enhanced train protection and warning systems (TPWS) and evaluates the options and the UK’s role as part of the European train network. Contains 11 annexes of statistical tables and lists. 405 The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry: Part 1: Report, by the Health and Safety Commission, Lord Cullen (Chairman). London: HSE Books, July 2001. 272p + 16p. With app., tab., diag., plates. (Departmental Publication) ISBN 0-7176-2056-5; £25.00. [Free copy available from the HSE website hhttp://www.hse.gov.uk/railway/paddrail/lgri1.pdfi.] The report investigates the causes of the crash at Ladbroke Grove Junction on 5 October 1999 between trains operated by Thames Trains and First Great Western and makes recommendations for the improvement of safety in the future. Chapter 1 provides an executive summary of the report after which the terms of reference for the inquiry are set out. The Report criticises HM Railways Inspectorate whilst also recognising the workload pressures facing HMRI at the time of the Ladbroke Grove resignalling scheme. It comments that management should have pressed for increased resources to deal with it and although additional resources were asked for, and allocated, the overall workload continued to increase beyond all expectation. Since Ladbroke Grove, HMRI is set to double in size by March 2002 with the total staff exceeding 200. Chapter 15 summarises the 89 recommendations, the last being that a review of compliance with the recommendations should be conducted on behalf of HSC within 6 months of publication of this report with further published reviews as deemed necessary thereafter. Appendices contain lists of lay and expert witnesses, abbreviations, previous incidents at signal SN109, and a glossary. See also: ‘‘The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry: Part 2: Report’’ (HSE Books, 2001. 223p. (Departmental Publication) ISBN 0-7176-2107-3). [Free copy available from the HSE website hhttp://www.hse.gov.uk/railway/ paddrail/lgri2.pdfi.] 406 Better Public Services through E-Government, by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: TSO, April 2002. 68p. With app., fig., tab., ann. (House of Commons Papers 2001– 2002; HC 704-I) ISBN 0-10-291465-6; £20.25. [Free copy available from the National Audit Office website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102704-ies.pdfi.] Considers the progress of government departments in achieving e-government; identifies risks that need to be managed; and sets out the benefits of e-government with examples of how individual departments have used information technology to bring about those benefits. Makes seven recommendations and highlights a range of good practice for further progress in this area. See also: ‘‘Better Public Services through E-Government: Case Studies in Support of Better Public Services through E-Government’’ (TSO, 2002. 49p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 704-II) ISBN 0-10-291465-6; £20.25 (3 vols.)). [Free copy available from the National Audit Office website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
229
01-02/0102704-ii.pdfi.] and ‘‘Better Public Services through E-Government: Academic Article in Support of Better Public Services through E-Government’’ (TSO, 22p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 704-III) ISBN none). [Free copy available from the National Audit Office website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/ 0102704-iii.pdfi.] 407 Implementation of Integrated Project Teams, by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: TSO, March 2002. 36p. With fig., tab., app. (House of Commons Papers 2001– 2002; HC 671) ISBN 0-10-291445-1. [Free copy available from the National Audit Office website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102671es.pdfi.] Examines how effectively the Ministry of Defence has managed the transition to a new project based on an organisational structure known as ‘‘Integrated Project Teams,’’ which is central to the newly introduced ‘‘Smart Acquisition’’ process for buying and supporting equipment. In particular, it considers whether Integrated Project Team structures and processes have been successfully introduced, and whether the momentum of the transition is being maintained through continued development of Integrated Project Team leadership, resources, and people. Also examines how well the reforms under Smart Acquisition are contributing to faster, cheaper, and better equipment acquisition. Makes six recommendations for the further evolution of Integrated Project Team structures and processes. 408 Individual Learning Accounts: Third report of Session 2001–02: Volume I, by the Education and Skills Committee, Barry Sheerman, Chairman. London: TSO, April 2002. 63p. With tab., app., ftn., procs., memo. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 561-I) ISBN 0-215-00303-9; £12.00. [Free copy available from the House of Commons website hhttp:// www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmeduski/561/56102.htmi.] Analyses the failure of the Individual Learning Account scheme, which was withdrawn in the autumn of 2001 amidst concerns that its rapid growth had outstripped its expected cost to public funds, and suspicions of abuse by some learning providers. Criticises the Department for Education and Skills and Capita, a private sector contractor, for failing in the preparation, running, and delivery of the scheme. Supports the concept of the Individual Learning Account scheme and makes recommendations for the introduction of a new scheme with better quality assurance, a sharper focus on the kind of skills it wishes to promote, and mechanisms against fraud and abuse. See also: ‘‘Individual Learning Accounts: Third report of Session 2001–02: Volume II: Minutes of Evidence and Appendices’’ (TSO, 2002. 169p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 561-II) ISBN 0-215-00304-7; £18.50). [Free copy available from the House of Commons website hhttp://www.publications.parliament.uk/ pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmeduski/561/56102.htmi.] 409 Learning from Bristol: Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. Ian Kennedy, Chairman. London: TSO, July 2001.
230
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
529p. With fig., tab., ftn., app. (Command papers; Cm 5207(I)) ISBN 0-10-152072-7; £32.00. [Free copy available from the Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry website hhttp://www. bristol-inquiry.org.uk/final_report/index.htmi.] Examines the management of care of children receiving cardiac surgical services at Bristol Royal Infirmary between 1984 and 1995. Makes findings as to the adequacy of the services provided and establishes what action was taken within and outside the hospital to deal with concerns raised about the surgery and to identify any failure to take appropriate action promptly. Concludes that the circumstances of Bristol, and the NHS at the time, led to the system for providing paediatric cardiac surgery being flawed, and that these flaws led to around one-third of all the children who underwent open-heart surgery at Bristol receiving less-than-adequate care. Makes seven recommendations including the need for child-centred health care; safe practices; continuing professional development; accountability; agreed and published standards of care; openness about clinical performance; and monitoring of clinical performance. Also includes two CD-ROMs covering the summary and recommendations; the report; annexes A, B, C, and D; inquiry seminars; evidence; and inquiry details. See also: ‘‘Learning from Bristol: Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995: Summary and Recommendations’’ (TSO, 2001. 48p. (Command papers; Cm 5207(II)) ISBN 0-10-152073-5; £8.00). [Free copy available from the Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry website hhttp://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/final_report/Summary. pdfi.] 410 Learning from Bristol: Department of Health’s Response to the Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995, by the Secretary of State for Health. London TSO, January 2002. 183p. With fig., annex. (Command papers; Cm 5363) ISBN 0-10-153632-1; £22.75. [Free copy available from the Department of Health website hhttp://www.doh.gov.uk/bristolinquiryresponse/bristolresponsefull.pdfi.] Endorses the findings of the Bristol Report including the recommendation for a separation of the Department of Health’s roles in management and regulation. Details the Government’s plans for the development of an overall framework for regulation and inspection to ensure that the NHS is working to the benefit of patients; to ensure that resources are distributed fairly to meet health needs; and to ensure proper accountability. Outlines the Government’s proposed reforms to achieve the following: putting patients at the centre of the NHS; improving children’s health care services; setting, inspecting, and monitoring the standards of care; ensuring the safety of care; developing a health service that is well led and managed; improving the regulation, education, and training of health care professionals; improving the quality, reliability, and range of information that supports decision making; strengthening the monitoring of performance; and involving patients and the public in health care. 411 Joining Up to Improve Public Services, by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: TSO, December 2001. 104p. With ftn., tab., fig., app. (House of Commons Papers 2001–
S. Brackenbury et al. / Journal of Government Information 29 (2002) 219–231
231
2002; HC 383) ISBN 0-10-291224-6; £14.75. [Free copy available from the National Audit Office website hhttp://www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/01-02/0102383.pdfi.] Evaluates the achievements of five public service initiatives and describes their good practice in the area of joint working: the Rough Sleepers Unit, Sure Start, Early Years Development and Childcare Partnerships, Business Link Partnerships, and British Trade International. Draws on these case studies to identify the risks that departments and their partners need to manage carefully to ensure that joint working initiatives produce benefits: removing the barriers to joint working; avoiding excluding groups of clients; informing intended beneficiaries of the services available; ensuring that benefits are sustainable; measuring performance; assessing cost effectiveness; and promoting accountability. Suggests key questions for departments to consider to ensure that initiatives achieve the intended benefits by successful joint working and management of the associated risks. Makes seven recommendations including the recommendation that the Cabinet Office produce and disseminate good practice guidance on joint working. 412 Second Chamber: Continuing the Reform: Fifth Report of Session 2001–02: Volume 1: Report and Proceedings of the Committee, by the Public Administration Select Committee, Tony Wright, Chairman. London: TSO, February 2002. 55p. With ann., procs. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 494-I) ISBN 0-215-00185-0; £11.00. [Free copy available from the House of Commons website hhttp://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ cm200102/cmselect/cmpubadm/494/49402.htmi.] Examines the Government’s proposals for reform of the Second Chamber contained in a White Paper entitled, ‘‘The House of Lords: Completing the Reform’’ (Cm 5291, 2001). Concludes on the basis of witness evidence and survey evidence taken from members of the House of Commons that the White Paper as it stands is neither sufficiently coherent nor acceptable to the majority. Recommends that no major change is required to the role or functions of the Second Chamber, but that its performance as a revising, scrutinising, and deliberative assembly should be strengthened. Puts forward a number of proposals as to how this can be achieved. See also: ‘‘Second Chamber: Continuing the Reform: Fifth Report of Session 2001– 02: Volume II: Minutes of Evidence and Appendices’’ (TSO, 2002. 177p. (House of Commons Papers 2001–2002; HC 494-I) ISBN 0-215-00185-0; £11.00). [Free copy available from the House of Commons website hhttp://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/ cmselect/cmpubadm/494/49402.htmi.]