Accepted Manuscript Growth and biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts on four food-contact surfaces at 22 °C and 10 °C Piumi De Abrew Abeysundara, Nitin Dhowlaghar, Ramakrishna Nannapaneni, Mark W. Schilling, Sam Chang, Barakat Mahmoud, Chander S. Sharma, Din-Pow Ma PII:
S0956-7135(17)30237-2
DOI:
10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.043
Reference:
JFCO 5600
To appear in:
Food Control
Received Date: 24 January 2017 Revised Date:
7 April 2017
Accepted Date: 28 April 2017
Please cite this article as: Abeysundara P.D.A., Dhowlaghar N., Nannapaneni R., Schilling M.W., Chang S., Mahmoud B., Sharma C.S. & Ma D.-P., Growth and biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts on four food-contact surfaces at 22 °C and 10 °C, Food Control (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.043. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Running title: Growth and biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe extracts.
2 Growth and biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts
4
on four food-contact surfaces at 22°C and 10°C
RI PT
3
Piumi De Abrew Abeysundara1, Nitin Dhowlaghar1, Ramakrishna Nannapaneni1*, Mark W.
6
Schilling1, Sam Chang1, Barakat Mahmoud1, Chander S. Sharma2, and Din-Pow Ma3
7
1
8
Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA, 2Poultry Science Department, Mississippi State University,
9
Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA and 3Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology,
SC
5
M AN U
Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University,
10
Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762,
11
USA
TE D
12 Keywords:
14
Listeria monocytogenes, Growth, Biofilm, Cantaloupe
15
EP
13
16
*
17
[email protected]
19
AC C
18
Author for correspondence: Phone: 662-325-7697, Fax: 662-325-8728, E-mail:
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
ABSTRACT The nationwide listeriosis outbreak that occurred in the United States during 2011
22
highlighted the importance of preventing cantaloupe contamination with Listeria monocytogenes
23
(Lm) within farm and processing environments. The objectives of this study were to determine
24
the effects of strain and temperature on growth and biofilm formation of Lm in cantaloupe flesh
25
and peel extracts on different food-contact surfaces. Growth of Lm strains was markedly greater
26
at high concentration of cantaloupe extracts and temperature in comparison to low concentration
27
and temperature. For 50 mg/ml of cantaloupe extract inoculated with 3 log CFU/ml, the growth
28
of Lm was 8.5 log CFU/ml in 32 h at 22°C and 6-7 log CFU/ml in 72 h at 10°C. For 2 mg/ml of
29
cantaloupe extract that was inoculated with Lm, the growth was 7-7.5 log CFU/ml in 72 h at
30
22°C and 3.5 log CFU/ml in 72 h at 10°C. There were no differences (P ˃ 0.05) among Lm
31
strains for biofilm formation in cantaloupe extracts, but biofilm formation was greater at high
32
temperature and high concentration. For 50 mg/ml cantaloupe extracts inoculated with 3 log
33
CFU/ml, the biofilm formation of Lm on stainless steel surface was approximately 7 log
34
CFU/coupon at 22°C in 4-7 days and 5-6 log CFU/coupon at 10°C in 7 days. For 2 mg/ml
35
cantaloupe extracts, the biofilm formation of Lm on the stainless-steel surface was approximately
36
5-6 log CFU/coupon at 22°C and 4-4.5 log CFU/coupon at 10°C in 7 days. The biofilm
37
formation by cantaloupe outbreak strain Lm 2011L-2625 in cantaloupe extracts was least on
38
buna-n rubber when compared to stainless steel, polyethylene and polyurethane surfaces (P <
39
0.05). These findings show that a very low concentration of nutrients from cantaloupe flesh or
40
peel can induce Lm growth and subsequent biofilm formation on different food-contact
41
processing surfaces.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
21
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
42
1. Introduction Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive rod shape, non-spore forming, facultative
44
anaerobic, bacterium which is responsible for listeriosis in humans and animals (Gandhi &
45
Chikindas, 2007). Among all the foodborne pathogens, L. monocytogenes is the most dangerous
46
due to its high mortality rate of 20-25% (Todd & Notermans, 2011). One of the deadliest
47
listeriosis outbreaks (33 deaths and one miscarriage) reported in the world history which
48
occurred in the USA in 2011 was associated with whole cantaloupe (McCollum, et al., 2013).
49
Among the 13 known serotypes of L. monocytogenes, strains that belong to serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b
50
and 4b are mostly associated with foodborne listeriosis outbreaks (Borucki, Peppin, White, Loge,
51
& Call, 2003; Nelson, et al., 2004) .
M AN U
SC
RI PT
43
L. monocytogenes is commonly found in soil, sewage and fecal matter (Locatelli, Spor,
53
Jolivet, Piveteau, & Hartmann, 2013). Cantaloupe can often be contaminated with pathogens that
54
are associated with soil and animals since it is grown close to the ground. The outer rind of
55
cantaloupe fruit provides an excellent surface for pathogenic microorganisms to attach and hide
56
(Webb, Erickson, Davey, & Doyle, 2015a, 2015b). L. monocytogenes cells that are attached to
57
the rind can contaminate cantaloupe-processing environments and promote growth and
58
subsequent biofilm formation on food-contact and non-food contact surfaces when appropriate
59
environmental conditions exist. The investigations conducted by U.S. Food
60
Administration during the multi-state cantaloupe outbreak in 2011 have found the presence of L.
61
monocytogenes on the food-contact and non-food contact surfaces of the cantaloupe processing
62
facility of Jensen farm, Colorado (McCollum, et al., 2013).
AC C
EP
TE D
52
and
Drug
63
A biofilm is a collection of microbial cell communities that are attached to a surface and
64
embedded in a self-produced matrix that consists of polysaccharides (Vestby, Møretrø, 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Langsrud, Heir, & Nesse, 2009; Whitehead & Verran, 2015). Biofilms are the most predominant
66
form of bacteria in food processing environments since microbial cells have extra protection
67
from desiccation, UV light, antimicrobials and sanitizing agents (Bernbom, Vogel, & Gram,
68
2011; Vestby, et al., 2009). Biofilms formed on the food-contact surfaces can cause cross-
69
contamination when improperly cleaned, thus creating a serious food safety issue (Wilks,
70
Michels, & Keevil, 2006).
RI PT
65
L. monocytogenes is capable of adhering to various types of food-contact surfaces that are
72
found in the food processing environments (Di Bonaventura, et al., 2008). Attachment and
73
biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes is influenced by the physiochemical properties of
74
environment (nutrients, temperature, pH, salt concentration) as well as the cell surface
75
(hydrophobicity, flagellation and motility) (Di Bonaventura, et al., 2008; Kalmokoff, et al.,
76
2001). Survival, growth and biofilm formation in standard microbiology growth media may not
77
reflect the actual behavior of L. monocytogenes in food processing environments. This is because
78
the media contain optimum levels of all the nutrients that are necessary for microbial growth. For
79
example, Beuchat, Brackett, Hao, and Conner (1986) studied the growth of L. monocytogenes in
80
cabbage juice at 5°C and observed that L. monocytogenes was capable of growing in sterile
81
cabbage juice containing <5% NaCl. In contrast, L. monocytogenes growth was observed when
82
≤10% NaCl was present in tryptic phosphate broth. Kim, Ryu, and Beuchat (2006) studied the
83
biofilm formation of Enterobacter sakazakii in different growth media at 25°C and found that E.
84
sakazakii did not form biofilms on the stainless steel containing lettuce juice broth but produced
85
biofilms on the same surfaces in infant formula broth. These findings suggest that the growth and
86
biofilm formation of foodborne bacterial pathogens can drastically differ depending on the
87
growth media.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
71
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
In cantaloupe processing environments, L. monocytogenes can be exposed to nutrients that
89
are leaked from cantaloupe fruits. Both cantaloupe flesh and peel contain nutrients such as sugar,
90
proteins, carotenoids, vitamin C and various minerals that are essential for microbial growth
91
(Koubala, Bassang’na, Yapo, & Raihanatou, 2016). There are no published data on the growth
92
and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe residue that persists on the food
93
processing surfaces. Penteado and Leitao (2004a) studied the growth of L. monocytogenes in
94
low-acid fruit pulps (melon, watermelon and papaya) at 10°C, 20°C and 30°C. According to their
95
study, the growth of L. monocytogenes varied depending on the fruit type.
SC
RI PT
88
Even though food-soils are removed from the cantaloupe processing environments routinely,
97
residues may persist on the food-contact surfaces when they are improperly cleaned (Fryer &
98
Asteriadou, 2009). There is a need for critical understanding of the survival, growth and biofilm
99
formation that reflects the actual behavior of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe residue when it is
100
present on food processing surfaces. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to
101
determine the effects of strain, temperature, nutrient level, and food-contact surface on the
102
growth and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts.
103
2. Materials and methods
104
2.1. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
96
105
L. monocytogenes strains that were used in this study are described in Table 1. The working
106
stock cultures of these strains were prepared by inoculating a colony grown on PALCAM agar
107
onto tryptic soy agar that contained 0.6% yeast extract (TSAYE) slants and incubated at 37°C for
108
24 h. These working stocks were stored at 4°C for 4-5 weeks. The overnight culture of each
109
strain was prepared by inoculation of 10 ml of tryptic soy broth that contained 0.6% yeast extract
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(TSBYE) from the working stocks and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 20 h with shaking at 150 rpm
111
(Imperial ІІІ incubator, Lab-Line Instrument Inc., IL, USA).
112
2.2. Food-contact surface preparation
RI PT
110
Four types of food-contact surfaces that are commonly used in the cantaloupe processing
114
industry were obtained (Table 2) and were cut into 1 cm×1.5 cm size coupons. Only stainless
115
steel coupons were reused during experiments. These coupons were soaked in an alkali detergent
116
for 1 h and washed thoroughly with deionized water. Washed stainless steel coupons were
117
autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min. Buna-n rubber, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and
118
thermoplastic polyurethane coupons were surface sterilized by submerging in 100% alcohol for
119
15 min prior to washing with sterile water to eliminate alcohol residue. Sterile coupons were
120
surface dried inside a biosafety cabinet prior to use. Sterility of these coupons was confirmed by
121
incubating coupons in fresh TSBYE at 37°C for 48 h.
122
2.3. Preparation of cantaloupe extracts
TE D
M AN U
SC
113
Cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) fruits were obtained from a local supermarket
124
and washed under running tap water for 1 min. The peel was then removed and the flesh was
125
deseeded. To prepare cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts, 100 g of cut cantaloupe flesh or peel
126
was blended with 400 ml of deionized water for 30 seconds using a juice extractor (Hamilton
127
beach, Model: 53514). The blended flesh and peel extracts were then filtered using a filter bag
128
(BA6141/STR) and centrifuged (2500 × g) (Beckman, Model TJ-6 centrifuge) for 5 min to
129
eliminate coarse particles. Cantaloupe extracts were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min and stored at
130
room temperature until needed. These cantaloupe extracts (200 mg/ml) were further diluted in
AC C
EP
123
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
physiological saline to obtain 50 mg/ml and 2 mg/ml of concentrations, respectively, based on
132
the fresh weight of the cantaloupe.
133
2.4. Determination of physical/chemical properties of cantaloupe extracts
RI PT
131
The pH of sterile cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts was determined using a calibrated pH
135
meter (Accumet Basic, AB15 pH meter, Fisher Scientific). Brix values were determined using a
136
refractometer (RHB-18ATC, GxPro). In order to determine the dry weight of cantaloupe flesh or
137
peel extract, 25 ml of each extract was transferred to a pre-weighed 50 ml centrifuge tube. These
138
extracts were freeze dried until a constant weight was obtained. The dry weight was calculated
139
using the following equation.
140 141
Dry weight (mg/ml) = (Post dry weight of the tube - Weight of the empty tube) mg
142
Volume of extract (ml)
TE D
143 144
M AN U
SC
134
2.5. Evaluation of growth of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe extracts at different temperatures Growth of L. monocytogenes EGD (Bug600), 2011-2624 and G1091 in 50 and 2 mg/ml of
146
cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts at 22°C and 10°C was studied. The overnight cultures of these
147
strains were prepared as described previously. One ml volumes of overnight cultures were
148
centrifuged for 5 min (9000 ×g, MARATHON 21000R, Fisher Scientific). The resulting cell
149
pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of physiological saline to obtain 9 log CFU/ml of stationary
150
phase cells.
AC C
EP
145
151
Cantaloupe flesh or peel extracts (50 and 2 mg/ml) were inoculated with the L.
152
monocytogenes stationary phase cells to yield an initial cell concentration of 3 log CFU/ml. The
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
inoculated cantaloupe extracts were incubated at 10°C (Low temperature, VWR, Scientific
154
Products, Sheldon manufacturing, INC., OR, 97113) and at room temperature (22°C). Cell
155
numbers were enumerated for 72 h at 8 h intervals by serially diluting an aliquot from the cell
156
suspensions in physiological saline and plating on tryptic soy agar that was enriched with 0.6%
157
yeast extract, Escullin and Ferric ammonium citrate (TSA-YEEF). These plates were incubated
158
at 37°C (Imperial III Incubator, Lab line instrument Inc., IL, USA) for 48 h to obtain colony
159
forming unit (CFU) counts.
160
2.6. Calculation of generation time
M AN U
SC
RI PT
153
The generation time (g) was calculated from the slope of the line of the semi logarithmic plot
162
of exponential growth using the mean of 4 replications. The equation of g = 0.301/slope of the
163
semi logarithmic plot of exponential growth was used to calculate the generation time as
164
described previously (Penteado & Leitao, 2004a, 2004b).
165
2.7. Evaluation of biofilm formation by different strains of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe
TE D
161
extracts at different temperatures
167
One ml from each overnight culture (Table 1) was centrifuged, and the resulting cell pellets
168
were resuspended in 1 ml of physiological saline. Cantaloupe flesh or peel extracts (50 and 2
169
mg/ml) were inoculated with stationary phase cells to obtain a 3 log CFU/ml initial cell
170
concentration. Sterile stainless steel coupons were placed in polystyrene 24-well plates with one
171
coupon per well. Each well was filled with 2 ml of cell suspension that was prepared in either
172
cantaloupe flesh or peel extract. These coupons were incubated at 22°C or 10°C for 1, 4 or 7
173
days.
AC C
EP
166
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
174
2.8. Enumeration of attached cells in the biofilm To enumerate attached cells in biofilms at the end of 1, 4 or 7 days, used growth media was
176
removed from the wells and coupons were washed twice by adding 2.75 ml of physiological
177
saline to remove loosely bound cells. Washed coupons were transferred into plastic tubes (15 ml-
178
TronadoTM) each containing 5 ml of 0.1% peptone water with 0.02% Tween 80 and five sterile
179
glass beads. Tubes were vortexed for 1 min (Vortex mixer, Labnet International, Inc, Edison, NJ,
180
USA) and aliquots of detached cell suspensions were serially diluted in physiological saline.
181
Each dilution was plated on TSA-YEEF and incubated at 37°C for 48 h.
182
2.9. Effect of the nature of the food-contact surface on biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes
M AN U
SC
RI PT
175
2011-2625 in cantaloupe extracts at different temperatures
184
Stainless steel, buna-n rubber, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and thermoplastic
185
polyurethane coupons were placed in 24-well plates with one coupon per well. L. monocytogenes
186
2011L-2625 cell suspension of 2 ml at 3 log CFU/ml was prepared in cantaloupe flesh or peel
187
extract (50 and 2 mg/ml) and added to each well. These coupons were incubated at 22°C and
188
10°C for 1, 4 or 7 days. At the end of each incubation period, biofilm formation on the four
189
different surfaces was enumerated as described previously.
190
2.10. Statistical analysis
AC C
EP
TE D
183
191
A completely randomized design with a 2-way factorial structure and 4 replications was
192
used. Mean values (log CFU/ ml or log CFU/coupon) were calculated using four values obtained
193
and analysis of variance with Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (P < 0.05) was
194
performed to separate means where significant differences occur. For the comparison study of
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
biofilm formation among 6 strains, the two factors included strain and temperature. For the
196
comparison of average biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes in 1, 4 and 7 days, the days were
197
compared with combination of concentration and temperature combination. For the comparison
198
of biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes 2011-2625 on different food contact surfaces, the two
199
factors included surfaces and temperature (P < 0.05).
200
3. Results
201
3.1. Physical and chemical properties of cantaloupe extract
SC
RI PT
195
The pH of cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts was around 6.5. Cantaloupe flesh extract had
203
around 1.6°B of total soluble solids while cantaloupe peel extract showed a 0.7 °B of total
204
soluble solids. The fresh weight for both cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts was 200 mg/ml. The
205
dry weight of cantaloupe flesh extract was 1.7 mg/ml and peel extract was 0.7 mg/ml.
206
3.2. Growth curves of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe extracts
TE D
M AN U
202
The growth rate of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts was greater at
208
higher cantaloupe extract concentration and higher temperature. The growth curves of L.
209
monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh at 50 and 2 mg/ml at 22°C and 10°C are shown in Figure 1.
210
In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh, the cell numbers of L. monocytogenes Bug600, 2011L-2625 and
211
G1091 increased by 5.5 log CFU/ml in 32-40 h at 22°C and remained stable at that level
212
afterwards, while L. monocytogenes increased by 3.5 log CFU/ml in 72 h at 10°C (Fig. 1ACE).
213
In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, the cell numbers of L. monocytogenes strains Bug600,
214
2011L-2625 and G1091 were increased by 4.5 log CFU/ml in 56 h at 22°C and 0.5 log CFU/ml
215
in 72 h at 10°C (Fig. 1BDF). In 50 and 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, the cell number of L.
216
monocytogenes from 8 – 72 h was greater (P < 0.05) at 22°C when compared to 10°C.
AC C
EP
207
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
A similar pattern was also observed for the growth of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe peel
218
extract at 50 and 2 mg/ml concentrations at 22°C and 10°C (Fig. 2). In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe peel
219
extract, the cell numbers of L. monocytogenes Bug600, 2011L-2625 and G1091 were increased
220
by 5.5 log CFU/ml at 22°C in 24-40 h and remained stable at that level afterwards, while L.
221
monocytogenes strains were increased by 3-4 log CFU/ml at 10°C in 72 h (Fig. 2ACE). In 2
222
mg/ml cantaloupe peel extract, the cell numbers of L. monocytogenes strains Bug600, 2011L-
223
2625 and G1091 were increased by 4-4.5 log CFU/ml in 48-56 h at 22°C and 0.5 log CFU/ml at
224
10°C in 72 h (Fig. 2BDF). For 50 and 2 mg/ml cantaloupe peel extract, the cell number of L.
225
monocytogenes from 8 – 72 h was greater (P < 0.05) at 22°C when compared to 10°C.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
217
226
The lag phase of L. monocytogenes strains was less than 8 h in 50 and 2 mg/ml cantaloupe
227
flesh or peel extracts at 22°C while it was extended to 16-18 h in 50 mg/ml or 72 h in 2 mg/ml
228
cantaloupe extracts at 10°C.
In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe extracts, the generation time was markedly increased by 2-4 h by
230
shift of temperature from 22°C to 10°C for all L. monocytogenes strains tested (Table 3). In 2
231
mg/ml cantaloupe extract, the generation time of L. monocytogenes extended by about 2-4 h
232
beyond the corresponding generation time in 50 mg/ml cantaloupe extract at 22°C. Since no
233
exponential growth was observed during the duration of 72 h, the generation time was not
234
calculated for L. monocytogenes in 2 mg/ml at 10°C.
235
3.3. Influence of strain and temperature on biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes on stainless
AC C
EP
TE D
229
236
steel surface containing cantaloupe extracts
237
Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes strains was greater in 50 mg/ml cantaloupe extract at
238
22°C (P < 0.05) as compared to 2 mg/ml at 10°C. In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, biofilm
239
formation of L. monocytogenes strains was 5-6 log CFU/coupon in 1 d and 7 log CFU/coupon in 11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4 or 7 d at 22°C. At 10°C, biofilm formation was 1.5 to 3.5 logs less compared to 22°C (P <
241
0.05) (Fig. 3ACE). In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes
242
was 4.5 log CFU/coupon in 1 d or 5-6 log CFU/coupon in 4 or 7 d at 22°C. At 10°C biofilm
243
formation was 1 to 2.5 logs less (P < 0.05) than that at 22°C (Fig. 3BDF). With one exception,
244
there were no differences (P < 0.05) in biofilm formation among the six strains of L.
245
monocytogenes in cantaloupe flesh extract under all environmental condition tested. For 50
246
mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, L. monocytogenes Bug600 had 1 log less biofilm formation in 1
247
day as compared to other strains at 22°C.
SC
RI PT
240
A similar pattern was also observed for the biofilm formation by six strains of L.
249
monocytogenes in cantaloupe peel extract at 50 and 2 mg/ml concentrations at 22°C and 10°C
250
(Fig. 4). In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe peel extract, biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes strains was
251
approximately 6 log CFU/coupon in 1 d and 7 log CFU/ coupon in 4 or 7 d at 22°C. At 10°C
252
biofilm formation was 1.5 to 4 logs less (P < 0.05) than that at 22°C (Fig. 4ACE). In 2 mg/ml
253
cantaloupe peel extract, biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes strains were approximately 4-5
254
log CFU/coupon in 1 d or 5-6 log CFU/coupon in 4 or 7 d at 22°C while their corresponding
255
biofilm formation at 10°C was 1.5 to 3 logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed at 22°C (Fig.
256
4BDF). No significant differences in biofilm formation were observed among the six strains of L.
257
monocytogenes in cantaloupe peel extract under all environmental condition tested with the
258
exception of 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract in 1 day at 10°C, where L. monocytogenes G1091
259
had 1 log greater biofilm formation as compared to other strains.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
248
260
In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh or peel extract, there was no increase (P < 0.05) in average
261
biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes observed from 4 to 7 d at 22°C, but there was 1.5 - 2.0
262
log increase observed at 10°C (Table 4). In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh or peel extract, there was
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
no increase (P < 0.05) in average biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes strains observed from
264
4- 7 d at both 22°C and 10°C.
265
3.4. Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 on different food-contact surfaces
RI PT
263
containing cantaloupe extracts
267
In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract inoculated with 3 log CFU/ml, L. monocytogenes
268
2011L-2625 biofilm formation was approximately 6.5 log CFU/coupon in 1 d or 7 log
269
CFU/coupon in 4 or 7 d on stainless steel, polyethylene and polyurethane surfaces 22°C. The
270
corresponding biofilm formation on buna-n rubber was 2.0-3.5 logs less (P < 0.05) than that
271
observed on the other three surfaces at 22°C (Fig. 5ACE). In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract,
272
L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 formed 1-2 log CFU/coupon biofilm on all the four surfaces in 1
273
d at 10°C. However, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 formed 5-6 log CFU/coupon biofilms on
274
stainless steel, polyethylene and polyurethane surfaces in 4 or 7 d at 10°C while its
275
corresponding biofilm formation on buna- n rubber was 2 logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed
276
on other surfaces at 10°C.
TE D
M AN U
SC
266
In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 biofilm formation was
278
approximately 4 log CFU/coupon in 1 d or 6 log CFU/coupon in 4 or 7 d on the stainless steel,
279
polyethylene and polyurethane surfaces. The corresponding biofilm formation on buna-n rubber
280
was approximately 1.5 logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed on the other three surfaces at 22°C
281
(Fig. 5BDF). In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes
282
2011L-2625 was approximately 2 log CFU/coupon on all the four surfaces in 1 d at 10°C.
283
However, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 formed 5.5-6 log CFU/coupon of biofilm on the
284
stainless steel, polyethylene and polyurethane surfaces in 4 or 7 d while its corresponding
AC C
EP
277
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
285
biofilm formation on buna-n rubber was 1-1.5 logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed on the
286
other surfaces at 10°C. In 50 mg/ml cantaloupe peel extract, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 biofilm formation was
288
approximately 6.5-7.0 log CFU/coupon in 1, 4 or 7 d on stainless steel, polyethylene and
289
polyurethane surfaces while its corresponding biofilm formation on buna-n rubber was 2.5-3.5
290
logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed on the other three surfaces at 22°C (Fig. 6ACE). In 50
291
mg/ml cantaloupe peel extract, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 formed 1-2 log CFU/coupon
292
biofilm on all four surfaces in 1 d at 10°C. However, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 formed 4.5-
293
6.0 log CFU/coupon biofilms on stainless steel, polyethylene and polyurethane surfaces in 4 or 7
294
d while its corresponding biofilm formation on buna-n rubber was 1-2 logs less (P < 0.05) than
295
that observed on other surfaces at 10°C.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
287
In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe peel extract, L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 biofilm formation was 4-
297
5 log CFU/coupon in 1 d or 6 log CFU/coupon in 4 or 7 d on stainless steel, polyethylene and
298
polyurethane surfaces. The corresponding biofilm formation on buna-n rubber was
299
approximately 1-2 logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed on the other surfaces at 22°C (Fig.
300
6BDF). In 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract, biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes 2011L-
301
2625 was approximately 2 log CFU/coupon on all the four surfaces in 1 d at 10°C. However, L.
302
monocytogenes 2011L-2625 formed 6 log CFU/coupon biofilms on stainless steel, polyethylene
303
and polyurethane surfaces in 4 or 7 d while the corresponding biofilm formation on buna-n
304
rubber was 1-2 logs less (P < 0.05) than that observed on other surfaces at 10°C.
AC C
EP
TE D
296
305
Overall, biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 on buna-n rubber was
306
significantly lower than the biofilm formation on stainless steel, polyethylene and polyurethane
307
surfaces in 50 and 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh and peel extract concentrations at 22°C and 10°C.
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
308
4. Discussion In the cantaloupe processing environments, nutrients from cantaloupe fruits can leak and
310
accumulate on food contact surfaces when improperly cleaned. Such residues may promote the
311
growth and subsequent biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes on the food processing surfaces.
312
This study focused on the critical understanding of the survival, growth and biofilm formation
313
that reflected the behavior of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe residue if present at two
314
concentrations on different processing surfaces. Cantaloupe extracts were autoclaved at 121°C
315
for 15 min to eliminate any interferences from background microflora and spores against L.
316
monocytogenes. Autoclaved food extracts were frequently used for studying the behavior of L.
317
monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Salmonella Enteritidis in fruit or vegetable juices. For
318
example, Raybaudi-Massilia, Mosqueda-Melgar, and Martín-Belloso (2009) studied the
319
antimicrobial activity of malic acid against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis and
320
Escherichia coli O157:H7 in apple, pear and melon juices using autoclaved fruit juices at 121°C
321
for 15 min. Mosqueda-Melgar, Raybaudi-Massilia, and Martín-Belloso (2007) sterilized melon
322
and water melon juice at 121°C for 15 min to study the combined effects of high-intensity pulsed
323
electric fields and natural antimicrobials to inactivate pathogenic microorganisms in fruit juices.
324
Oliveira, et al. (2014) sterilized fruit juices at 115°C for 10 min to study the effectiveness of a
325
bacteriophage in reducing Listeria monocytogenes in apple, pear and melon juices. Beuchat, et
326
al. (1986) studied the growth of L. monocytogenes in cabbage juice after autoclaving at 121°C
327
for 15 min. Preliminary studies revealed that growth of L. monocytogenes was similar in
328
autoclaved or filter sterilized cantaloupe flesh or peel extracts with respect to the length of the
329
lag phase or maximum growth in cell population. Autoclaving did not change the pH or the brix
330
value of cantaloupe flesh and peel extracts significantly. The pH of both cantaloupe flesh and
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
309
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
peel extracts were around 6.4-6.5 and was optimum for L. monocytogenes growth. The brix value
332
indicated that cantaloupe flesh extract contained more soluble solids than the peel extract which
333
was also reflected in the dry weight that was calculated for each extract. This was probably due
334
to the high sugar content in cantaloupe flesh when compared to peel.
RI PT
331
This study was conducted at two temperature conditions. The 22°C condition was chosen as
336
cantaloupe processing operations are mostly done at room temperature. The 10°C condition was
337
chosen to study how lowering temperature can affect the growth and biofilm production of L.
338
monocytogenes. While whole or cut cantaloupe products are recommended to be stored at 2-5°C,
339
in real world, temperature fluctuations can happen during cold storage environments and in
340
transportation, where temperature may raise up to 10°C (BettGarber, Greene, Lamikanra,
341
Ingram, & Watson, 2011; Koseki & Isobe, 2005). Therefore, observations taken at 10°C will be
342
useful to understand growth and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes at low temperature
343
conditions in the presence of cantaloupe residue.
TE D
M AN U
SC
335
Results indicate that concentration as low as 2 mg/ml of cantaloupe flesh and peel extract is
345
an adequate substrate for L. monocytogenes to induce growth. The influence of temperature on
346
the growth rate of L. monocytogenes was evident in 50 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh extract where all
347
L. monocytogenes strains yielded a doubling time of approximately 2 h at 22°C and 4-6 h at
348
10°C. Similarly, Penteado and Leitao (2004a) and de Modelos (2007) observed that the
349
generation time of L. monocytogenes ScottA in cantaloupe pulp increased from 0.84 h to 1.74 h
350
or from 1.74 h to 7.12 h, respectively, when the growth temperature was decreased from 30°C to
351
22°C or from 22°C to 10°C.
AC C
EP
344
352
The concentration of cantaloupe extract in the growth media also affected the generation time
353
of L. monocytogenes. For example, for 50 mg/ml cantaloupe extracts, L. monocytogenes strains
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
yielded a generation time of approximately 2 h as compared to 4.5-5.5 h for 2 mg/ml cantaloupe
355
extract at 22°C. Overall, the lesser temperature and decreasing nutrient concentration in the
356
growth media, there was an increase in the doubling time that inversely decreased the growth
357
rate of L. monocytogenes.
RI PT
354
Results from the current study indicate that low temperature (10°C) is not a barrier for L.
359
monocytogenes growth in cantaloupe processing environments. For example, all L.
360
monocytogenes strains showed rapid growth at 10°C in 50 mg/ml cantaloupe extracts. However,
361
there was no significant growth until 72 h in 2 mg/ml cantaloupe extracts suggesting that the
362
growth of L. monocytogenes was inhibited at 10°C when the available nutrients were limited.
M AN U
SC
358
A stainless steel surface was used for the comparison study of biofilm formation by L.
364
monocytogenes strains belonging to serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b and 4b since it is the most commonly
365
found surface in food processing environments (Hilbert, Bagge-Ravn, Kold, & Gram, 2003).
366
With few exceptions, there were no differences (P < 0.05) in biofilm formation among the six L.
367
monocytogenes strains that were tested in cantaloupe flesh or peel extract under different
368
environmental conditions. Previously, it was reported that L. monocytogenes strains belonging to
369
serotype 1/2a formed biofilms with greater bacterial counts than 1/2b and 4b (Borucki, et al.,
370
2003). Di Bonaventura, et al. (2008) also reported that L. monocytogenes strains belonging to
371
serotype 1/2c formed biofilms with greater bacterial counts on stainless steel and glass when
372
compared to strains belonging to serotype 1/2a, 1/2b or 4b at 37°C. However, it was recently
373
reported that the ability of L. monocytogenes to form biofilms depends on the individual strains
374
while the correlation between biofilm formation and L. monocytogenes serotype remained
375
inconclusive (Doijad, et al., 2015).
AC C
EP
TE D
363
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
L. monocytogenes biofilm formation was greater (P < 0.05) at 22°C when compared to 10°C
377
in 1, 4 or 7 days in both 50 and 2 mg/ml cantaloupe flesh concentrations. Similarly, Di
378
Bonaventura, et al. (2008) reported that L. monocytogenes biofilm formation was greater at 37°C
379
or 22°C when compared to 12°C or 4°C. This may be due to the increase in cell hydrophobicity
380
with increasing temperature, which enhances the subsequent cell attachment to hard surfaces
381
(Chavant, Martinie, Meylheuc, Bellon-Fontaine, & Hebraud, 2002; Di Bonaventura, et al., 2008).
382
Flagella induced cell motility is required for cell attachment and the initiation of biofilm
383
formation (Todhanakasem & Young, 2008; Vatanyoopaisarn, Nazli, Dodd, Rees, & Waites,
384
2000). Di Bonaventura, et al. (2008) found that the motility of L. monocytogenes was drastically
385
reduced at lower temperature, where among 44 L. monocytogenes strains, 30 were motile at 22°C
386
while only 4 strains were motile at 12°C. This suggests that at 10°C, the decreased motility of L.
387
monocytogenes could result in lower cell attachment and subsequently less biofilm formation on
388
stainless steel as compared to 22°C in cantaloupe extract. Ochiai, et al. (2014) reported that the
389
persistent L. monocytogenes strains that were obtained from a chicken processing plant had
390
enhanced ability to alter biofilm formation in response to changing the temperature from 30°C to
391
37°C when compared to non-persistent L. monocytogenes strains. These findings suggest that
392
regulation of biofilm formation through temperature control in L. monocytogenes may be
393
significant for its survival and growth in food processing environments.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
376
394
Biofilm formation of foodborne pathogens under very low concentrations of nutrients has
395
been studied by many researchers (Solomon, Niemira, Sapers, & Annous, 2005; Stepanović,
396
Ćirković, & Ranin, 2004; Yang, Khoo, Zheng, Chung, & Yuk, 2014). Foodborne pathogens may
397
have access to different levels of nutrients depending on where they persist in food processing
398
facilities. In the present study, it was observed that the decreasing cantaloupe extract
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
concentration from 50 to 2 mg/ml decreased L. monocytogenes biofilm formation at 22°C and
400
10°C in 7 days. Stanley and Lazazzera (2004) reported that starvation could induce more biofilm
401
formation in Bacillus subtilis. The starvation condition of Bacillus subtilis promoted higher
402
activation of transcription factors such as RpoS and Spo0A that are needed for biofilm
403
formation. Yang, et al. (2014) reported that S. Enteridis produced more cellulose in the
404
extracellular polymeric substances matrix of biofilm when grown in 1/20 TSB as compared to an
405
un diluted TSB. However, the effects of nutrient density of the growth medium on biofilm
406
formation may depend on the nature of the microorganism. Stepanović, et al. (2004) observed
407
that L. monocytogenes produced a greater amount of biofilm in TSB when compared to 1/20
408
TSB, while Salmonella spp. showed the opposite behavior. Similarly, Solomon, et al. (2005)
409
reported that Salmonella spp. from clinical samples promoted greater biofilm formation in 1/20
410
TSB when compared to TSB while the meat isolate Salmonella spp. from meat samples did not
411
differ in biofilm formation as the nutrient density in the growth media varied.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
399
Various materials such as stainless steel, glass, polyurethane, buna-n rubber and polyethylene
413
are used in the food processing and retail environments as food-contact surfaces. L.
414
monocytogenes cells adhere to a wide variety of surfaces found in the food processing and retail
415
environments (Beresford, Andrew, & Shama, 2001). It was observed that L. monocytogenes
416
formed biofilms on stainless steel, buna-n rubber, polyethylene, polyurethane surfaces in
417
cantaloupe extracts at 50 and 2 mg/ml concentrations at both 22°C or 10°C. However, regardless
418
of the growth temperature or the concentration of cantaloupe extract, L. monocytogenes 2011L-
419
2526 formed 1-3.5 logs less biofilm on buna-n rubber as compared to stainless steel,
420
polyethylene or polyurethane.
421
monocytogenes and Salmonella formed less biofilm on buna-n rubber than stainless steel surface.
AC C
EP
412
Previously, Ronner and Wong (1993) also reported that L.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
422
Surfaces such as glass and stainless steel are hydrophilic while rubber and plastic surfaces are
423
more hydrophobic (Stepanović, et al., 2004).
424
monocytogenes formed more biofilm on hydrophilic materials as compared to hydrophobic
425
materials regardless of the growth temperature while Chavant, et al. (2002) reported that L.
426
monocytogenes biofilm formation was more rapid on hydrophilic surfaces as compared to
427
hydrophobic materials. Even though polyethylene and polyurethane are hydrophobic, biofilm
428
formation on those surfaces was as great as stainless steel in this study.
SC
RI PT
Bonsaglia, et al. (2014) reported that L.
In summary, results indicate that L. monocytogenes can induce significant growth and
430
biofilm formation on different food-contact surfaces in very low concentrations of cantaloupe
431
flesh and peel extracts. The growth and biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes was greater in 50
432
mg/ml cantaloupe flesh or peel extract concentration at 22°C as compared to 2 mg/ml cantaloupe
433
flesh or peel extract at 10°C. No major differences were found among the L. monocytogenes
434
strains tested for biofilm formation in cantaloupe extracts. L. monocytogenes formed less biofilm
435
on buna-n rubber than stainless steel, polyurethane and polyethylene containing cantaloupe
436
extract. These findings illustrate the critical importance of appropriate cleaning and sanitizing of
437
cantaloupe processing surfaces because even the presence of small sediments of cantaloupe
438
residue on the food-contact surfaces can promote growth and subsequent biofilm formation in
439
the processing environments, which creates serious food safety risks.
440
Acknowledgements
441
This research was supported in part by the Strategic Research Initiative and Food Safety
442
Initiative awards to RN by the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station
443
(MAFES) under project MIS-401160. The authors would like to thank Dr. Cathy C. Webb,
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
429
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
444
Center for Food Safety, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia for
445
providing L. monocytogenes outbreak strains used in this study.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
446
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
447
Table 1
448
L. monocytogenes strains tested in this study.
RI PT
449
L. monocytogenes
Serotype
Isolation source
Obtained from
2011L-2625
1/2a
Cantaloupe outbreak 2011
UGA
EGD (Bug600)
1/2a
Clinical
2011-2624
1/2b
Cantaloupe outbreak 2011
F8385
1/2b
Carrot
ScottA
4b
Clinical
G1091
4b
Coleslaw
450
SC
M AN U
UGA: University of Georgia
459
FDA: Food and Drug Administration, USA
AC C
EP
TE D
458
460
451 Institute Pasteur, 452 France 453 UGA 454 UGA 455 FDA 456 UGA 457
22
461
Table 2
462
Description of food-contact surfaces tested in this study. Material
Thickness Manufacturer
Used for
(inch) Stainless steel (304 #4) 0.018
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Thyssen Krup Table tops, Utensil &
0.031
Warco Nitrite
Conveyer belt
Thermoplastic
0.01
Habasit
Conveyer belt
0.125
Sibe
Cutting boards, Conveyer belt,
Automation
Table tops
Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene
AC C
EP
TE D
463
M AN U
Nitrile buna rubber
polyurethane
464
SC
equipment surface
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
465
Table 3
466
Generation time of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe extracts at 10°C and 22°C
strain
pe extract
Generation time of L. monocytogenes (h) 50 mg/ml 10°C
EGD (Bug600)
Flesh
5.9 (0.93)
2.0 (0.95)
2011L-2624
Flesh
4.4 (0.95)
2.0 (0.91)
G1091
Flesh
4.1 (0.89)
2.2 (0.99)
EGD (Bug600)
Peel
5.6 (0.98)
2011L-2624
Peel
G1091
Peel
2 mg/ml
10°C NA
NA
5.2 (0.83)
1.5 (0.91)
NA
5.2 (0.87)
4.3 (0.94)
2.3 (0.85)
NA
4.1 (0.84)
3.2 (0.92)
1.8 (0.88)
NA
5.7 (0.70)
M AN U
468
NA: Not available
5.4 (0.83)
4.6 (0.86)
TE D
R2 values are shown in brackets.
22°C
NA
AC C
EP
467
469
22°C
RI PT
Cantalou
SC
L. monocytogenes
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 4
471
Average biofilm formation of six strains of L. monocytogenes in cantaloupe extracts under
472
different conditions.
RI PT
470
Age of
Cantaloupe
Average biofilm formation of L. monocytogenes
biofilm
extract
(log CFU/coupon)
(days)
2 mg/ml 22°C
Flesh
2.2 ±0.1aA
4
Flesh
3.8 ± 0.1bA
7
Flesh
5.2 ± 0.1cB
1
Peel
2.1 ± 0.18aA
4
Peel
7
Peel
22°C
5.5 ± 0.2aC
2.0 ± 0.1aA
4.1 ± 0.1aB
7.0 ± 0.1bC
3.5 ± 0.1bA
5.5 ± 0.2bB
7.0 ± 0.1bC
4.0 ± 0.2bA
5.6 ± 0.1bB
6.0 ± 0.10aC
2.1 ± 0.04aA
4.3 ±0.12aB
TE D
1
10°C
M AN U
10°C
SC
50 mg/ml
4.1 ± 0.07bA
6.9 ± 0.09bC
3.5 ± 0.02bA
5.3 ± 0.07bB
5.7 ± 0.08cB
7.1 ± 0.06bC
4.2 ± 0.13bA
5.3 ± 0.09bB
Numbers in the same column of the same extract sharing different lowercase letters or numbers
474
in the same raw sharing different upper case letters are significantly different.
475
Fig. 1. Growth of L. monocytogenes Bug600 (A, B), 2011-2625 (C, D) and G1091 (E, F) in 50
476
mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg/ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe flesh extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C (■).
477
Error bars indicate standard error.
478
Fig. 2. Growth of L. monocytogenes Bug600 (A, B), 2011-2625 (C, D) and G1091 (E, F) in 50
479
mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe peel extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C (■).
480
Error bars indicate standard error.
AC C
EP
473
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 3. Biofilm formation by six strains of L. monocytogenes on the stainless steel surface in 50
482
mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe flesh extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C ( ) in
483
1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). Note: Bars with different lowercase letters indicate
484
significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature and * indicate
485
significant difference between biofilms belong to the same strain formed at different temperature
486
based on Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test ANOVA test (P < 0.05). Error bars
487
indicate standard error.
488
Fig. 4. Biofilm formation by six strains of L. monocytogenes on the stainless steel surface in 50
489
mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe peel extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C ( ) in
490
1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). : Bars with different lowercase letters indicate
491
significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature and * indicate
492
significant difference between biofilms belong to the same strain formed at different temperature
493
based on Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test ANOVA test (P < 0.05). Error bars
494
indicate standard error.
495
Fig. 5. Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 on four food-contact processing
496
surfaces in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe flesh extract at 10°C (□)
497
and 22°C ( ) in 1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). Bars with different lowercase
498
letters indicate significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature.
499
Fig. 6. Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 on four food-contact processing
500
surfaces in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe peel extract at 10°C (□) and
501
22°C ( ) in 1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). Bars with different lowercase letters
502
indicate significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
481
503
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
504
References
505
Beresford, M., Andrew, P., & Shama, G. (2001). Listeria monocytogenes adheres to many materials found in foodprocessing environments. Journal of Applied Microbiology,
507
90(6), 1000-1005.
508
RI PT
506
Bernbom, N., Vogel, B. F., & Gram, L. (2011). Listeria monocytogenes survival of UV-C
radiation is enhanced by presence of sodium chloride, organic food material and by
510
bacterial biofilm formation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 147(1), 69-73. BettGarber, K., Greene, J., Lamikanra, O., Ingram, D., & Watson, M. (2011). Effect of storage
M AN U
511
SC
509
512
temperature variations on sensory quality of freshcut cantaloupe melon. Journal of
513
Food Quality, 34(1), 19-29
514
Beuchat, L., Brackett, R., Hao, D. Y., & Conner, D. (1986). Growth and thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in cabbage and cabbage juice. Canadian Journal of
516
Microbiology, 32(10), 791-795.
Bonsaglia, E., Silva, N., Júnior, A. F., Júnior, J. A., Tsunemi, M., & Rall, V. (2014). Production
EP
517
TE D
515
of biofilm by Listeria monocytogenes in different materials and temperatures. Food
519
Control, 35(1), 386-391.
520 521 522
AC C
518
Borucki, M. K., Peppin, J. D., White, D., Loge, F., & Call, D. R. (2003). Variation in biofilm formation among strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 69(12), 7336-7342.
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Chavant, P., Martinie, B., Meylheuc, T., Bellon-Fontaine, M. N., & Hebraud, M. (2002). Listeria
524
monocytogenes LO28: surface physicochemical properties and ability to form biofilms at
525
different temperatures and growth phases. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
526
68(2), 728-737.
527
RI PT
523
De Modelos, D. (2007). Growth of Salmonella Enteriditidis and Listeria monocytogenes in melon pulp: predictive modelling and evaluation of model performance. Brazilian
529
Journal of Food Technology, 10(3), 176-182.
SC
528
Di Bonaventura, G., Piccolomini, R., Paludi, D., D’orio, V., Vergara, A., Conter, M., & Ianieri,
531
A. (2008). Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on
532
various foodcontact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface
533
hydrophobicity. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 104(6), 1552-1561. Doijad, S. P., Barbuddhe, S. B., Garg, S., Poharkar, K. V., Kalorey, D. R., Kurkure, N. V.,
TE D
534
M AN U
530
Rawool, D. B., & Chakraborty, T. (2015). Biofilm-forming abilities of Listeria
536
monocytogenes serotypes isolated from different sources. PloS one, 10(9), e0137046.
EP
535
Fryer, P., & Asteriadou, K. (2009). A prototype cleaning map: a classification of industrial
538
cleaning processes. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 20(6), 255-262.
539
Gandhi, M., & Chikindas, M. L. (2007). Listeria: a foodborne pathogen that knows how to
540 541
AC C
537
survive. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 113(1), 1-15.
Hilbert, L. R., Bagge-Ravn, D., Kold, J., & Gram, L. (2003). Influence of surface roughness of
542
stainless steel on microbial adhesion and corrosion resistance. International
543
Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 52(3), 175-185. 28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
544
Kalmokoff, M., Austin, J., Wan, X. D., Sanders, G., Banerjee, S., & Farber, J. (2001). Adsorption, attachment and biofilm formation among isolates of Listeria monocytogenes
546
using model conditions. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 91(4), 725-734.
RI PT
545
Kim, H., Ryu, J. H., & Beuchat, L. R. (2006). Attachment of and biofilm formation by
548
Enterobacter sakazakii on stainless steel and enteral feeding tubes. Applied and
549
Environmental Microbiology, 72(9), 5846-5856.
550
SC
547
Koseki, S., & Isobe, S. (2005). Prediction of pathogen growth on iceberg lettuce under real temperature history during distribution from farm to table. International Journal of Food
552
Microbiology, 104(3), 239-248.
553
M AN U
551
Koubala, B. B., Bassang’na, G., Yapo, B. M., & Raihanatou, R. (2016). Morphological and biochemical changes during muskmelon (Cucumis melo var. Tibish) fruit maturation.
555
Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4(1), 18-28.
558 559 560 561
properties influence survival of Listeria monocytogenes in soil. PloS one, 8(10), e75969.
EP
557
Locatelli, A., Spor, A., Jolivet, C., Piveteau, P., & Hartmann, A. (2013). Biotic and abiotic soil
McCollum, J. T., Cronquist, A. B., Silk, B. J., Jackson, K. A., O'Connor, K. A., Cosgrove, S., Gossack, J. P., Parachini, S. S., Jain, N. S., & Ettestad, P. (2013). Multistate outbreak of
AC C
556
TE D
554
listeriosis associated with cantaloupe. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(10), 944-
953.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
562
Mosqueda-Melgar, J., Raybaudi-Massilia, R. M., & Martín-Belloso, O. (2007). Influence of treatment time and pulse frequency on Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli and
564
Listeria monocytogenes populations inoculated in melon and watermelon juices treated
565
by pulsed electric fields. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 117(2), 192-200.
566
Nelson, K. E., Fouts, D. E., Mongodin, E. F., Ravel, J., DeBoy, R. T., Kolonay, J. F., Rasko, D.
RI PT
563
A., Angiuoli, S. V., Gill, S. R., & Paulsen, I. T. (2004). Whole genome comparisons of
568
serotype 4b and 1/2a strains of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes reveal
569
new insights into the core genome components of this species. Nucleic Acids Research,
570
32(8), 2386-2395.
M AN U
571
SC
567
Ochiai, Y., Yamada, F., Mochizuki, M., Takano, T., Hondo, R., & Ueda, F. (2014). Biofilm formation under different temperature conditions by a single genotype of persistent
573
Listeria monocytogenes strains. Journal of Food Protection, 77(1), 133-140.
574
TE D
572
Oliveira, M., Vinas, I., Colas, P., Anguera, M., Usall, J., & Abadias, M. (2014). Effectiveness of a bacteriophage in reducing Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut fruits and fruit juices.
576
Food microbiology, 38, 137-142.
578 579
Penteado, A. L., & Leitao, M. F. (2004a). Growth of Listeria monocytogenes in melon,
AC C
577
EP
575
watermelon and papaya pulps. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 92(1), 89-94.
Penteado, A. L., & Leitao, M. F. (2004b). Growth of Salmonella Enteritidis in melon,
580
watermelon and papaya pulp stored at different times and temperatures. Food Control,
581
15(5), 369-373.
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
582
Raybaudi-Massilia, R. M., Mosqueda-Melgar, J., & Martín-Belloso, O. (2009). Antimicrobial activity of malic acid against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis and
584
Escherichia coli O157: H7 in apple, pear and melon juices. Food Control, 20(2), 105-112
585
Ronner, A. B., & Wong, A. C. (1993). Biofilm development and sanitizer inactivation of Listeria
586
monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium on stainless steel and Buna-n rubber.
587
Journal of Food Protection, 56(9), 750-758.
SC
RI PT
583
Solomon, E. B., Niemira, B. A., Sapers, G. M., & Annous, B. A. (2005). Biofilm formation,
589
cellulose production, and curli biosynthesis by Salmonella originating from produce,
590
animal, and clinical sources. Journal of Food Protection, 68(5), 906-912.
592 593
Stanley, N. R., & Lazazzera, B. A. (2004). Environmental signals and regulatory pathways that influence biofilm formation. Molecular Microbiology, 52(4), 917-924.
TE D
591
M AN U
588
Stepanović, S., Ćirković, I., & Ranin, L. (2004). Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 38(5), 428-
595
432.
597 598 599 600
Todd, E., & Notermans, S. (2011). Surveillance of listeriosis and its causative pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control, 22(9), 1484-1490.
AC C
596
EP
594
Todhanakasem, T., & Young, G. M. (2008). Loss of flagellum-based motility by Listeria monocytogenes results in formation of hyperbiofilms. Journal of Bacteriology, 190(17),
6030-6034.
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
601
Vatanyoopaisarn, S., Nazli, A., Dodd, C. E., Rees, C. E., & Waites, W. M. (2000). Effect of flagella on initial attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel. Applied and
603
Environmental Microbiology, 66(2), 860-863.
604
RI PT
602
Vestby, L. K., Møretrø, T., Langsrud, S., Heir, E., & Nesse, L. L. (2009). Biofilm forming
abilities of Salmonella are correlated with persistence in fish meal-and feed factories.
606
BMC Veterinary Research, 5(1), 20.
607
SC
605
Webb, C. C., Erickson, M. C., Davey, L. E., & Doyle, M. P. (2015a). Effectiveness of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate employed as a sanitizer during harvest or packing of
609
cantaloupes contaminated with Salmonella Poona. International Journal of Food
610
Microbiology, 207, 71-76.
M AN U
608
Webb, C. C., Erickson, M. C., Davey, L. E., & Doyle, M. P. (2015b). Evaluation of single or
612
double hurdle sanitizer applications in simulated field or packing shed operations for
613
cantaloupes contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. Agriculture, 5(2), 231-244.
616 617 618
EP
615
Whitehead, K. A., & Verran, J. (2015). Formation, architecture and functionality of microbial biofilms in the food industry. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2, 84-91. Wilks, S. A., Michels, H. T., & Keevil, C. W. (2006). Survival of Listeria monocytogenes Scott
AC C
614
TE D
611
A on metal surfaces: implications for cross-contamination. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 111(2), 93-98
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
619
Yang, Y., Khoo, W. J., Zheng, Q., Chung, H.J., & Yuk, H.G. (2014). Growth temperature alters Salmonella Enteritidis heat/acid resistance, membrane lipid composition and
621
stress/virulence related gene expression. International Journal of Food Microbiology,
622
172, 102-109.
RI PT
620
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
623
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
A
SC
RI PT
B
D
TE D
M AN U
C
E
F
EP
AC C
L. monocytogenes log CFU/ml
Figure 1
0
16
32
48
64
80
0
16
32
48
64
80
Time (h) Fig. 1. Growth of L. monocytogenes Bug600 (A, B), 2011-2625 (C, D) and G1091 (E, F) in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg/ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe flesh extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C (■). Error bars indicate standard error.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
A
SC
RI PT
B
D
TE D
M AN U
C
E
F
EP
AC C
L. monocytogenes log CFU/ml
Figure 2
0
16
32
48
64
80
0
16
32
48
64
80
Time (h) Fig. 2. Growth of L. monocytogenes Bug600 (A, B), 2011-2625 (C, D) and G1091 (E, F) in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe peel extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C (■). Error bars indicate standard error.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 3 9
A
8 7 a
6
B
a
a
ab
a
b
5
a
a
a
a
x
x
x
a
a
a
a
x
x
x
x
x
E
x
x
a
x
x
x
4
x
x
F
x
a x
a
x
x
x
a
a
a
a x
x
G1091
ScottA
F8385
2011-2624
Bug600
2011L-2625
2011-2624
Bug600
AC C
1
G1091
2
ScottA
EP
3
a
x
x
a
a
a
a
TE D
a
x
a
x
x
a
a
a
M AN U
x
5
0
a
SC
a
x
x
D
a
F8385
6
x
C
8 7
x x
1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9
x
x
RI PT
x
2011L-2625
L. monocytogenes log CFU/coupon
3 2
a
a
4
Listeria monocytogenes strains Fig. 3. Biofilm formation by six strains of L. monocytogenes on the stainless steel surface in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe flesh extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C ( ) in 1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). Note: Bars with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature and * indicate significant difference between biofilms belong to the same strain formed at different temperature based on Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test ANOVA test (P < 0.05). Error bars indicate standard error.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 4 9
B
A
8 7
a
a
a
a
6
a
a
5 4 y
xy
x
y
y
x
0 9
C
D
a
a
a x
x
x
x
x
3 2 1 0 9 a
TE D
E
a
7
a
x
x x
5
x
a
x
x
x
a
a
a x
x
x
F
a a
a
x
x
x
a
a
a
a
x
x
x
x
G1091
ScottA
F8385
2011-2624
Bug600
2011L-2625
AC C
1
Bug600
2
G1091
3
0
a
EP
4
a
ScottA
6
x
x
4
8
a
M AN U
6 5
x
x
SC
a
a
2011L-2625
7
a
F8385
L. monocytogenes log CFU/coupon
1
a
x
x
2
8
a
a
RI PT
x y
a
a
2011-2624
3
a
a
Listeria monocytogenes strains
Fig. 4. Biofilm formation by six strains of L. monocytogenes on the stainless steel surface in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe peel extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C ( ) in 1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). : Bars with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature and * indicate significant difference between biofilms belong to the same strain formed at different temperature based on Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test ANOVA test (P < 0.05). Error bars indicate standard error.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 5 9
A
8 7
B a
a
a
6 5
a
a
a
b
3
b x
2
x
x
x
x
x
C
8
D
a
a
7
a
M AN U
a
6
x
x
x
b
5
x
x
SC
0 9
a
a
b x
x
x
y
y
2 1 0 9
E
8
a
b
x
x
6
a
x
a
5
F
x
EP
y
4 3
AC C
2
a
a
a x
x
Poly urethane
3
Poly Ethylene
4
TE D
L. monocytogenes log CFU/coupon
1
7
RI PT
4
b y
Buna-n rubber
Stainless steel
Poly urethane
Poly Ethylene
Buna-n rubber
0
Stainless steel
1
Food-contact processing surface
Fig. 5. Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 on four food-contact processing surfaces in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe flesh extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C ( ) in 1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). Bars with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 6 9
A
8
B a
a
7
a
6
a
5 4
b
c
3 2
x
x
x
x
x
x
C
D
a
a
a
7
a
x
5
b
x
b
x
y
x
y
3 2 0 9
TE D
1
E
8 7
x
x
4
a
a
M AN U
6
x
x
SC
0 9
a
5
x
x
6 b
EP
y
4 3
AC C
2
F
a
a
x
a
a
a b
x
x
x
y
Poly urethane
Poly Ethylene
Buna-n rubbeer
Stainless steel
Poly urethane
Poly Ethylene
0
Buna-n rubbeer
1
Stainless steel
L. monocytogenes log CFU/coupon
1
8
RI PT
a b
Food-contact processing surface Fig. 6. Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes 2011L-2625 on four food-contact processing surfaces in 50 mg/ml (A, C, E) and 2 mg /ml (B, D, F) of cantaloupe peel extract at 10°C (□) and 22°C ( ) in 1 day (A, B),4 days (C, D) and 7 days (E, F). Bars with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between biofilms formed at the same temperature.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights Low concentrations cantaloupe extracts can induce Lm growth and biofilm formation.
•
Lm 2011L-2625 biofilms was least on buna-n rubber when compared to other surfaces.
•
No differences in biofilm formation for six Lm strains tested in cantaloupe extracts.
•
Lm biofilms increased with higher conc. of cantaloupe extracts at 20°C and 10°C.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
•