Accepted Manuscript Improving development efficiency through decision analysis: Reservoir protection in Burkina Faso Denis Lanzanova, Cory Whitney, Keith Shepherd, Eike Luedeling PII:
S1364-8152(18)30112-9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.016
Reference:
ENSO 4380
To appear in:
Environmental Modelling and Software
Received Date: 10 February 2018 Revised Date:
10 October 2018
Accepted Date: 22 January 2019
Please cite this article as: Lanzanova, D., Whitney, C., Shepherd, K., Luedeling, E., Improving development efficiency through decision analysis: Reservoir protection in Burkina Faso, Environmental Modelling and Software (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.016. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Improving development efficiency through decision analysis:
2
reservoir protection in Burkina Faso
RI PT
1
3
Denis Lanzanova1,2*, Cory Whitney2, Keith Shepherd3, Eike Luedeling3,4,
4
1
5
66, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
6
2
7
Bonn, Germany;
8
3
9
4
SC
University of Geneva – Institute for Environmental Sciences, Boulevard Carl-Vogt
M AN U
University of Bonn – Center for Development Research, Genscherallee 3, 53113
World Agroforestry Centre – United Nations Avenue, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya University of Bonn, INRES Horticultural Sciences, Auf dem Hügel 6, 53121 Bonn
*Corresponding author:
[email protected]
11
Declaration of interest: none
13
Abstract
14
AC C
12
EP
TE D
10
15
In the arid areas of Sub-Saharan Africa, perennial challenges of water scarcity and food insecurity are exacerbated by climate change and variability. The
16
development of robust strategies to cope with the region’s climatic challenges
17
requires thorough consideration of uncertainty and risk in decision making.
18
We demonstrate the use of probabilistic decision analysis to compare 1
intervention options to prevent reservoir sedimentation in Burkina Faso. To
20
illustrate this approach, we developed a causal impact pathway model based
21
on the local knowledge of expert stakeholders. Input parameters were
22
described by probability distributions derived from estimated confidence
23
intervals. The model was run in a Monte Carlo simulation to generate the
24
range of plausible decision outcomes, quantified as the net present value and
25
the annual cash flow. We used Partial Least Squares regression analysis to
26
identify the parameters that most affected projected intervention outcomes
27
and we computed the Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) to
28
highlight critical uncertainties. Numerical results show that the preferred
29
intervention to secure agricultural production is a combination of dredging,
30
rock dams and a buffer scheme around the reservoir. The EVPI calculation
31
reveals an information value for the profit per ton of vegetables, indicating
32
that more information on this variable would be useful for supporting the
33
decision. However, without the need for follow-up analysis, the results show
34
high probability of benefits given the combined interventions, which, given the
35
current state of information, should be preferred over inaction.
36
37 38
sedimentation, Burkina-Faso
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
19
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Keywords
Monte-Carlo simulation, Decision analysis, Uncertainty assessment, Reservoir
2
1 Introduction
40
Harsh climatic conditions and population growth are major challenges to food
41
security in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)(Omisore, 2017). In arid and semi-arid
42
regions across SSA, farmers face highly fluctuating water supply, a situation
43
that will likely be exacerbated by climate change (Wood et al. 2014). At the
44
same time, water demand for food production is expected to rise as
45
populations grow (Amisigo et al. 2015; World Bank 2017). These issues are of
46
particular concern to the Upper Volta river basin. The region is considered
47
highly sensitive to environmental changes and rainfall variability (Amisigo et
48
al. 2015), and agriculture is dominated by small-scale, rainfed production,
49
with very few farmers having access to irrigation (less than 1% of agricultural
50
land is irrigated; Bharati et al. 2008). As a consequence, agricultural
51
productivity is very low.
52
In Burkina Faso, these conditions are the root cause of widespread rural
53
poverty (Sanfo and Gérard 2012). To cope with the local challenges, many
54
communities, governments, and NGOs have constructed small-scale reservoirs
55 56 57
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
39
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
for irrigation in rural areas. More than 2000 of these structures have been
built in the Upper Volta basin (Cecchi et al. 2008). They provide seasonal
water storage for small-scale irrigation during the cropping season (Bharati et
58
al. 2008), water for livestock and an opportunity for fish farming (Venot and
59
Cecchi 2011). They act as a buffer against extreme weather events (Boelee et
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
al. 2013) and are considered instrumental for local food security and
61
livelihoods (Palmieri et al. 2001; Wisser et al. 2010; Poussin et al. 2015).
62
However, the performance of many of these reservoirs has fallen short of
63
expectations (Barbier et al. 2011), and many are subject to degradation and
64
poor maintenance (Venot and Hirvonen 2013). One of the major problems is
65
sedimentation caused by soil erosion within the reservoir catchment, which
66
can damage the irrigation system in the short term (Kondolf et al. 2014) and
67
eventually fill in the reservoir completely, rendering the infrastructure useless
68
(Schmengler 2011; Chitata et al. 2014; Kondolf et al. 2014). Rehabilitation of a
69
reservoir damaged by sedimentation is costly at best, and sometimes not
70
possible at all (Kondolf et al. 2014). Possible intervention points for managing
71
sedimentation are the initial design of the reservoir, management of the
72
agricultural activities and the establishment of structures in the riparian areas
73
(Kondolf et al. 2014).
74
Sedimentation is a major investment risk, since it limits the time horizon, over
75
which communities can benefit from a reservoir. This highlights the
76
importance of appropriate management strategies, through which the
78
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
77
RI PT
60
productive lifetime of these structures can be greatly extended (Palmieri et al.
2001). However, the best way to manage sedimentation is often not directly
79
apparent to communities and governments, due to uncertainty regarding the
80
costs and benefits and the poor understanding of sediment generating
81
processes and their response to management actions (Schleiss et al, 2016). To 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
choose appropriate strategies, many policy-makers, development
83
practitioners and NGOs need scientific support.
84
Predicting sediment yield and accumulation through time is extremely
85
difficult (Morris and Fan, 1998). The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE)
86
(Wischmeier and Smith, 1978), later modified to the Revised Universal Soil
87
Loss Equation (RUSLE) (Renard et al, 1997) has been widely applied for this
88
purpose at the watershed scale (Griffin et al., 1988; Jain et al., 2001) but
89
suffers from high uncertainty in factors influencing reservoir sedimentation
90
(Salas and Shin, 1999). Limitations in data availability, among other factors,
91
can lead to high uncertainty in model results.
92
Bayesian frameworks have been used to link model calibration and
93
uncertainty assessment. The most common approaches include the Bayesian
94
Monte Carlo method (Qian et al., 2003), Markov chain Monte Carlo
95
(Kattwinkel and Reichert, 2017) and the generalized Likelihood Uncertainty
96
Estimation (GLUE) pseudo-Bayesian method (Zheng and Keller, 2007), which
97
are used, among others applications, to establish uncertainty bounds for
98
simulated flows (Fonseca et al., 2014). Chaudhary and Hantush (2017)
100
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
99
RI PT
82
presented a novel approach that combines a Bayesian Monte Carlo simulation with a maximum likelihood estimation. Yet such advanced treatments of
101
uncertainty have largely been restricted to uncertainties about classic
102
hydrological parameters, whereas the success of watershed interventions
103
often depends on a host of additional factors, e.g. in the social and economic 5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
domains, which can have a major impact on success or failure of innovations.
105
Comprehensive consideration of all relevant factors is required.
106
Here we present the use of decision-centered models to address risks and
107
uncertainties in sedimentation management decisions. The approach
108
embraces complexity, makes recommendations that account for the imperfect
109
state of available knowledge and identifies critical uncertainties that decision-
110
supporting research should address (Luedeling and Shepherd 2016).
111
Decision-centered models can be collaboratively developed between analysts,
112
stakeholders and decision-makers through participatory processes, where all
113
important factors involved in a decision are gathered and synthesized into an
114
ex-ante impact projection model (Luedeling et al. 2015). Tools that determine
115
the value of information can be used to identify the most critical knowledge
116
gaps, from the perspective of a decision-maker aiming to optimize overall
117
desired outcomes (Luedeling and Goehring 2017). Such modeling techniques
118
can prioritize the knowledge gaps that should most urgently be narrowed in
119
order to reduce uncertainty about the decision or inform the design and
120
prioritization of future research (Hubbard 2014; Rosenstock et al. 2014;
122
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
121
RI PT
104
Strong et al. 2014; Luedeling et al. 2015). Collecting additional information on
such high-value variables and using this information to update the decision
123
model allows decision-makers to iteratively improve their ability to anticipate
124
decision outcomes and identify the preferred option. When sufficient data is
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
available, the coupling with a watershed hydrological transport model might
126
be considered.
127
Research into sedimentation control in small reservoirs has largely been
128
based on disciplinary analyses, but it has not yet been able to capture many
129
important uncertainties related to the social and natural systems on which
130
reservoirs depend. We use the specific example of a small reservoir that
131
serves the communities of Lagdwenda in the Northern Volta basin, Tenkodogo
132
district, Bougou province, Burkina Faso, to demonstrate the application of
133
Decision Analysis tools for sustainable management of small reservoirs.
134
Sedimentation is the main operational concern affecting the reservoir. It
135
impacts the reliability of irrigation systems and is a major threat for the
136
resilience of the local communities to all types of climatic shocks.
137
Sedimentation in the reservoir results from a number of known factors, such
138
as, among others, poorly planned grazing of river banks or conversion of
139
natural vegetation. We demonstrate tools that can support the difficult task of
140
deciding which interventions to choose, if any, to mitigate the problems of
141
sedimentation due to the absence of riparian vegetation. We make use of a
144
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
125
145
interventions (buffer strips, rock dams, dredging and combinations of these).
146
Such an exercise typically involves synergies and trade-offs between
147
interventions, which have been shown to affect the achievement of
142 143
causal impact pathway model, constructed and parameterized based on the
knowledge of local expert stakeholders. We use Monte Carlo simulations to compare the ranges of plausible outcomes for several locally recognized
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
environmental targets at large scales (Gao and Bryan, 2017). By evaluating
149
model outputs, we seek to identify the parameters that most affect projected
150
intervention outcomes and to highlight critical uncertainties.
151
2 Materials and methods
152
2.1 The reservoir of Lagdwenda
153
The reservoir of Lagdwenda is located in the Northern Volta basin, in
154
Tenkodogo district, Bougou province, Burkina Faso. The site is semi-arid, with
155
a dry season from October to mid-May and a rainy season from mid-May to
156
October. Average annual rainfall varies between 800 and 900 mm. The
157
warmest period is from March to May and a relatively cooler period from June
158
to February, with an annual average temperature of 29°C. The reservoir of
159
Lagdwenda (Figure 1) had a capacity of 63,000 cubic meters in 2002 (year of
160
construction) and benefited more than 7,000 people in 2005.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
148
161 8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 1. Lagdwenda reservoir in the Northern Volta basin of Burkina Faso. a. Map of the
163
reservoir. The blue polygon at the bottom center represents the downstream irrigation
164
scheme, while the top red polygon represents the upstream cropping area. b. Variation in
165
reservoir surface area. Dark blue indicates year-round water (April 2016, 18 ha), light blue
166
indicates low-wet season water (January 2016, 34 ha), and the outer blue layer indicates
167
high wet-season water (October 2015, 55 ha). Data from Landsat 8 (MNDWI).
168
The main use of the reservoir is irrigation for rice and vegetable production.
169
Downstream from the reservoir, a formal irrigation scheme has been
170
developed (Figure 1a). In addition, farmers have established an informal
171
cropping area upstream of the reservoir (Figure 1a), which violates key
172
recommendations on reservoir protection (Schleiss et al. 2016) and
173
contributes to sedimentation. An important secondary use of the reservoir is
174
water provision for livestock and animals in the riparian area, which also
175
contributes to sedimentation.
176
Reservoir size, as well as the types of crops that are cultivated, vary markedly
177
between the wet and the dry season (Figure 1b), with the reservoir reaching
178
its maximum extent of 55 ha at the end of the wet season, when farmers
179
practice paddy rice cultivation. During the dry season, farmers grow mixed
181 182
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
180
RI PT
162
vegetables and some cereals. Sedimentation control interventions are urgently
needed and local decision-makers are looking for cost-effective ways to
restore reservoir functions and ensure their provision over the long term.
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2.2 Overview of the approach
184
The method proposed in this paper provides a new approach to support
185
practical decisions on agricultural systems in the face of risk and imperfect
186
information. It is inspired by the Applied Information Economics (AIE)
187
approach developed by Hubbard Decision Research (Hubbard 2014). This
188
decision analysis approach, which has been widely used in business decision
189
support and a number of other contexts (e.g. Luedeling et al., 2015; Wafula et
190
al., 2018), employs participatory processes to explore in detail the
191
consequences of a particular decision. Rather than aiming to precisely predict
192
results for all available decision options, which is usually impossible for even
193
moderately complex systems, AIE attempts to capture the state of knowledge
194
on all processes and input variables, e.g. in the form of probability
195
distributions, and translate these into probabilistic simulations that predict
196
the full range of plausible outcomes. From these outputs, critical knowledge
197
gaps can be derived, measurements can be undertaken to narrow these gaps,
198
and the model can successively be updated until confident decision support is
199
possible.
201
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
200
RI PT
183
Building on the AIE approach, we conducted quantitative ex-ante impact analyses for several decision options, using Monte Carlo simulations to
202
account for risks and uncertainties. The methodology combines participatory
203
approaches and modeling techniques. As a first step, a decision-centered
204
model is collaboratively developed between analysts, main stakeholders and 10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
decision-makers during a workshop. Model development seeks to capture all
206
important factors for the decision, regardless of whether they can easily be
207
measured or modelled. After synthesizing these variables into a model, the
208
state of knowledge on all variables is quantified through the use of probability
209
distributions. When no information is available on particular variables, values
210
are elicited from participants. Before providing these estimates, participants
211
are subjected to calibration training (Hubbard 2014) to improve their ability
212
to estimate their state of uncertainty. Such training has been shown to
213
increase people’s capacity to provide accurate estimates by reducing errors of
214
judgment (Lichtenstein et al. 1982). All estimates are consolidated into one
215
single probability distribution for each model parameter (Luedeling et al.
216
2015). In this way, uncertainty is explicitly represented as probabilities of
217
different possible states of the world (Pannell and Glenn 2000). A description
218
of the process can be found in Hubbard and Millar (2014). Basically, the
219
principle is to combine methods from decision theory, economics and
220
actuarial science in order to improve on human expert judgments.
221
In a second step, once numbers are available, the model is run in order to
224
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
205
225
knowledge gaps. The variables with the highest information value can be
226
interpreted as priorities for measurements to be undertaken to reduce
227
uncertainty around the decision (Rosenstock et al. 2014). The EVPI can thus
222 223
convert probabilistic inputs into probabilistic outputs, which express the
range of plausible decision results that can be expected. We then use the
expected value of perfect information (EVPI) to determine the most critical
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
be used to inform the design and prioritization of future research (Strong et al.
229
2014) and may help reduce the range of plausible outcomes.
230
2.3 Analysis protocol
231
2.3.1 Step 1: Selecting experts
232
The design of an efficient sedimentation management intervention for the
233
reservoir of Lagdwenda requires assessment of multiple uncertain quantities
234
and risks. Beyond the lack of well-established knowledge on the natural and
235
anthropogenic origins of sedimentation, the issue is very often context-
236
specific. To gather appropriate information, we relied on experts’ knowledge
237
about various ways to manage sedimentation and for identifying parameters
238
of interest (such as benefits, costs and risks).
239
Therefore, the first stage of the protocol focuses on the delicate process of
240
selecting the most relevant experts. The selection process started five months
241
before the decision workshop, with a field visit of the area, in which we met
242
the local communities and their representatives. We also participated in a
243
stakeholder workshop organized in the province by the local office of SNV
245 246
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
244
RI PT
228
(Netherlands Development Organization). We used the event as an
opportunity to establish direct contacts with officers from the ministries of
agriculture and environment, as well as local NGOs, and to get a better
247
overview of local experts and relevant stakeholders. We collected names and
248
details of potential participants and worked closely with SNV and the 12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
agricultural officer of Tenkodogo Province to maintain connections with the
250
local community representatives.
251
The list of potential invitees to a decision analysis workshop was then reduced
252
using selection criteria, e.g. those who have relevant expertise for the specific
253
context of the Lagdwenda reservoir. From these, we selected a group of eight
254
national-level and local experts, who were agricultural specialists, donors,
255
policy-makers and the local communities.
256
2.3.2 Step 2: Eliciting model structure
257
The process to elicit model structures through experts has several steps. First,
258
experts are invited to participate in a decision workshop. The information
259
collected in the participatory analysis of the decision problem is assembled
260
into a conceptual, graphical model. This is constructed as a decision’s impact
261
pathway, with causal relationships based on experts’ expectations, gathered
262
during brainstorming sessions. The conceptual model development aims to
263
capture the ‘big picture’ of the decision by gathering all system dynamics and
264
relevant issues, without taking constraints of measurement into account.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
249
13
265
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 2. Diagram of a four-stage protocol for eliciting expert knowledge when designing a
267
decision model of different interventions to reduce sedimentation in the Lagdwenda
268
reservoir in Burkina Faso.
269
To elicit more details, we followed the four-stage procedure (Figure 2)
270
outlined by Whitney et al (2018). In the first stage of the procedure the
271
decision about sedimentation control was broken down by the entire group
272
into specific sub-questions. In the second stage, participants were split into
273
working groups to address the different questions both individually and
276
AC C
EP
TE D
266
277
the outputs were revised until a consensus was reached. In the third stage the
278
models produced in working groups were unified into consolidated models,
279
one for each of the initial sub-questions. In the fourth stage the consolidated
274 275
within their groups. We used participatory techniques to avoid problems of
variation among experts (Bolger and Wright, 2017). For example, individual
outputs were peer-reviewed by the other members of the group, after which
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
sub-models were combined into one single conceptual model. The final
281
conceptual model represented the impact pathway of the management
282
decision that could be formally modeled and simulated.
283
2.3.3 Step 3: Calibrating experts
284
Parameters of the model are catalogued and grouped into two categories (cf.
285
Figure 3). The first category gathers parameters that can be documented by
286
existing academic or technical sources (e.g. databases, reports, literature). The
287
second category consists of all parameters for which no such sources exist and
288
that should be estimated. These data are simply too costly (and could take too
289
much time) to obtain through survey or field studies. To account for this in the
290
Lagdwenda case, we relied on experts’ knowledge to assess the value of these
291
parameters, but also the uncertainty around these values. It should be noted
292
here that this methodology can be applied regardless of whether these
293
uncertainties result from lack of theoretically attainable knowledge or
294
parameter uncertainties, such as future rainfall amounts, that cannot currently
295
be known precisely.
298
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
280
299
been adopted and tested for application in conservation science (Martin et al.
300
2012). Expert knowledge can be valuable for decision support, provided it is
301
combined with explicit consideration of uncertainty (Fred et al. 2017). If
296 297
Elicitation techniques are a well-recognized form of knowledge generation in
situations where sampling efforts would be impractical or too expensive
(Samantha et al. 2009), and formal procedures for eliciting and encoding have
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
uncertainty is ignored, however, expert knowledge can manifest as spurious
303
opinions, which can undermine any well-intentioned decision analysis process
304
(Morgan, 2014). It is therefore crucial to elicit this information rigorously in
305
order to get valid estimates. This requires recognition and correction for
306
several biases that can affect people’s judgement (Lichtenstein et al. 1982, Soll
307
and Klayman, 2004). In order to avoid such biases, we train experts in
308
techniques that have been shown to improve people’s ability to estimate their
309
own uncertainty and thereby reduce errors of judgement. This is a crucial step
310
in the elicitation process (Figure 3).
311
All experts are required to undergo ‘calibration training’, which teaches them
312
how to make estimates as reliably as possible. The training consists of a series
313
of procedures, grounded on research findings in cognitive psychology.
314
Through these procedures participants learn how to assess their state of
315
uncertainty and reduce errors of judgement through exercises that reveal to
316
them their personal biases (overconfidence or underconfidence). To this end,
317
they compare their performance in responding to trivia questions to the
318
correct answers to these questions. Rather than providing ‘best guesses’,
321
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
302
322
their biases (most people are initially overconfident), experts are instructed in
323
a set of mental techniques that has been shown to improve people’s ability to
319 320
participants are requested to provide two numbers, for which they are 90%
sure that the correct answer is between these numbers. Perfectly ‘calibrated’
estimators should get 90% of their range estimates correct. Once exposed to
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
provide accurate estimates. More information on these procedures can be
325
found in Hubbard (2014).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
324
326
Figure 3. Diagram of the process of expert calibration training for model parameter
328
estimation when parameterizing a decision model of different interventions to reduce
329
sedimentation in the Lagdwenda reservoir in Burkina Faso.
330
TE D
327
2.3.4 Step 4: Estimation and simulation
332
Calibrated experts were trained to use conscious estimation procedures to
333
provide subjective probability distributions for uncertain variables in the
336
AC C
EP
331
337
often default to a normal, uniform or triangular distribution. To help with this,
338
common distribution shapes were displayed during the estimation process.
334 335
decision model. This is usually done by eliciting confidence intervals (defined
by their upper and lower bounds) that have a 90% chance of containing the
value of interest. Selecting a distribution is not always easy for experts, who
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
When multiple experts estimate the same quantities, a subsequent process to
340
reconcile different estimates is needed. A general conclusion from the
341
literature on how to combine the diverse elicited values is that averaging is
342
often a preferred strategy (Aidan et al. 2015). Since we had a small expert
343
group, we were able to aggregate individual assessments by consensus.
344
The resulting conceptual model was then reformulated as a set of equations
345
that reflected as much as possible the experts’ and analysts’ understanding of
346
the decision. This mathematical model was coded as a function in R
347
programming language (R Core Team, 2017). All formulas and scripts are
348
available in the supplementary materials as well as in a separate data
349
repository (Luedeling et al., 2018). The model was then parameterized (either
350
with hard data or “calibrated” estimates) and run 10,000 times as a
351
probabilistic Monte Carlo simulation. This number of runs was sufficient for
352
generating smooth outcome distributions for all cases, which was verified by
353
visual inspection. Each run provided one possible outcome. The totality of all
354
model runs generated a probability distribution that illustrates the plausible
355
outcomes given the experts’ current state of uncertainty.
357
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
339
358
preferable option (e.g. a specific intervention in a group of possible
359
interventions). However, the value of expected outcomes can remain unclear,
360
when uncertainty about input values is high. Sensitivity analysis can identify
356
2.3.5 Step 5: Sensitivity analysis and refinement of the model
The output of a Monte Carlo simulation often directly reveals a clearly
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
variables that outcome projections respond to. We used Partial Least Squares
362
(PLS) regression analysis, in particular its Variable Importance in the
363
Projection (VIP) metric, for identifying the variables that most affected the
364
decision outcomes projected by the simulation (Wold, 1995; Luedeling and
365
Gassner 2012). We preferred this method over more systematic sensitivity
366
analysis methods such as the eFAST (Gao, et al., 2016) or Morris (Gao and
367
Bryan, 2016) methods, because it determines sensitivity to input variables
368
based on the outputs of the Monte Carlo analysis, rather than requiring
369
computationally expensive additional simulation runs. For Monte Carlo
370
simulation and sensitivity analysis, we used the ‘decisionSupport’ package
371
(Luedeling and Göhring, 2017) in R.
372
In cases where the outputs of the Monte Carlo simulation clearly identify one
373
decision option as preferable over the alternatives, the current state of
374
knowledge is sufficient for issuing a recommendation on how the decision
375
should be taken. When no option emerges as clearly preferable, decision-
376
critical uncertainties can be identified using the Expected Value of Perfect
377
Information (EVPI). The EVPI is the difference between the value of a decision
380
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
361
381
to the absolute value of the decision outcome, the EVPI is concerned only with
382
whether its value is positive or equal to zero, because this is the only criterion
383
that decides if more funds should be invested to collect better information.
378 379
made with perfect information and the value of a decision made with information that is currently available. It can be interpreted as a rational
willingness-to-pay to gain access to perfect information. Rather than referring
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
As a first step in the EVPI computation procedure, we used Spearman’s rank
385
correlation test to check whether each of the input variables was correlated
386
with projected outcomes. If this was not the case, the EVPI for such variables
387
was set to zero. For all other variables, the relationship between input and
388
output variables was identified by first sorting the array of output values
389
produced by the Monte Carlo simulation according to values of the respective
390
input variable. The resulting set of values was then smoothed using a second-
391
order low-pass Butterworth filter (Proakis and Manolakis, 1992), with a
392
critical frequency of one divided by one tenth of the number of values in the
393
Monte Carlo output. Smoothing is necessary at this stage to separate the signal
394
emerging from the variable under scrutiny from the substantial noise caused
395
by variation in all other variables, which vary randomly within the Monte
396
Carlo simulation. The EVPI was then calculated as the sum of all outputs with a
397
sign that did not correspond to the sign of the expected value, multiplied by
398
the probability assigned to this outcome (Wafula et al., 2018).
399
Measurements of input variables with the highest EVPI, which can be used to
400
update the decision model, help to narrow uncertainty about how the decision
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
401
RI PT
384
should be taken. The process is repeated until the best option is determined.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3 Results
403
3.1 The Decision Model
404
3.1.1 Scoping and design
405
In July 2016, eight experts (see acknowledgments) were consulted in a four-
406
day workshop, where they collaborated to produce graphical models of
407
expected decision impact pathways.
408
The workshop began with framing the decision to be modeled. The overall
409
context was defined in plenary discussions, after which participants were split
410
into working groups. Participants were asked to consider the whole impact
411
pathway, and break it down into several stages. As a second step, the team
412
identified the most relevant interventions for sedimentation management. In
413
order to support the process, ten interventions based on recommendations
414
from international experts and lessons learned from other studies (Kondolf
415
and al. 2014), were proposed and debated by the experts (see Supplementary
416
Information). These were intended to stimulate the discussion; experts of the
417
modeling team were free to define other sediment control interventions.
419
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
418
RI PT
402
Ultimately, they identified three possible interventions:
• Dredging along the main stream inlet, allowing water to flow to agricultural
420
fields west of the reservoir and reduce sediment build-up. The intervention
421
consists of dredging 3 meters deep for 2 km along the main stream inlet.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
422
• Building permeable rock dams, also known as ‘check dams’, along the reservoir’s tributaries, reducing flow velocities and the erosive potential of
424
water. These are low dams of loose stone retained by mesh wire that
425
prevent large quantities of sediment from being deposited in the reservoir.
426
These would be constructed every 5 km along the stream network
427
upstream of the reservoir, a spacing that has frequently been used for
428
similar interventions in this region.
SC
M AN U
• A buffer protection scheme around the reservoir and stream inlets, preventing sedimentation from agriculture around the reservoir and
431
reducing deposits of sediments coming from the surrounding catchment.
432
The protection is composed of 3 buffer strips of 75-100 meters each. The
433
first strip is made of stone barriers/contour bounding with stabilizing
434
plants (grasses). The second strip consists of vegetables mixed with shrubs
435
for firewood. The third zone is a mix of crops with fruit trees.
436
Graphic representations of all interventions are shown in Figure 4.
437
We carried out comprehensive investigations of costs, benefits and risks
438 439
EP
TE D
430
AC C
429
RI PT
423
associated with each intervention. Causal relationships between variables were taken into account.
22
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
440
Figure 4. Intervention options to reduce sedimentation in the Lagdwenda reservoir in
442
Burkina Faso, co-designed by workshop participants: a. dredging for 2 km along the main
443
stream inlet to a depth of 3 meters; b. low dams of loose stone retained by mesh wire
444
every 5 km along the stream network upstream of the reservoir; c. three buffer strips of 75-
445
100 meters each.
M AN U
441
TE D
446
3.1.2 Benefits, costs and trade-offs
448
Formally, we defined a benefit as an economic surplus (e.g. net revenue from
449
agricultural production) generated by an intervention (or a combination of
450
intervention options) in comparison to the baseline case (current situation).
452
AC C
451
EP
447
Broadly speaking, water for irrigation and viability of the irrigation water supply system were regarded as the main benefits of sedimentation control.
453
Water for irrigation – Because sediments accumulate in the reservoir, the dam
454
gradually loses its capacity to store water. We modeled the avoided expected
455
decline in irrigable area (area in both upstream and downstream irrigation 23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
schemes that can be irrigated given the water stock in the reservoir) as a
457
benefit for the different scenarios.
458
Viability of the irrigation water supply system – The main irrigation scheme of
459
Lagdwenda is located downstream from the dam. Water supply is achieved
460
through a system of pipes underneath the dam’s barrier. Sediments regularly
461
disrupt the functioning of this system, blocking the pipes and preventing
462
water from flowing into the agricultural area. Interventions that reduce
463
sedimentation prevent the obstruction of irrigation pipes that supply this
464
downstream irrigation scheme.
465
Changes in land use – Trade-offs were expected among land uses when
466
implementing the buffer intervention. In the current situation (baseline case),
467
communities of Lagdwenda grow rice and vegetables in an informal irrigation
468
scheme, located upstream close to the shore of the reservoir, near the main
469
inlet. The buffer protection scheme intervention consists of three buffer strips
470
of 75-100 meters each. This would result in taking this area out of cultivation.
471
On the other hand, two buffers of the scheme are expected to be partially
472
cultivated (vegetables, fruits and cereals).
474
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
456
475
anthropogenic) that may impact the project, along its different stages. To this
476
end, two categories of risks were considered: ex-ante risks and ex-posts risks.
473
3.1.3 Risks and uncertainties The model seeks to take into account all risks (either natural or
24
Ex-ante risks impact the probability that an intervention is completed, which
478
affects intervention costs. When the project is implemented, the full cost of the
479
intervention applies, while a reduced, sunk cost applies otherwise. We
480
considered three ex-ante risks: the lack of community involvement, the lack of
481
institutional involvement and the lack of donor involvement.
482
Ex-post risks impact the effectiveness of the intervention, which affects the
483
benefits. Ex-post risks can be natural, social or technical. We considered three
484
ex-post risks: natural hazards, poor maintenance and poor design.
485
Additional risk factors, especially risks arising from knowledge limitations, are
486
implicitly captured by the model’s probabilistic inputs. For instance, the risk of
487
changes to the future sediment load of the inlet streams due to climate change
488
was not explicitly expressed but covered by experts’ providing wide
489
confidence intervals for future sedimentation rates.
490
Consideration of risks and uncertainties enables a risk-adjusted cost-benefit
491
analysis to inform decision-making. The decision model that emerged
492
integrates all benefits, costs and risks into estimates of the Net Present Value
493
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
477
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
of each option (Figure 5).
25
494
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
495
Figure 5. Diagram of the overall model structure of interventions to reduce sedimentation
496
in the Lagdwenda reservoir in Burkina Faso. NPV is the Net Present Value for all
497
interventions. D/S = downstream; U/S = upstream.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3.1.4 Decision model code
499
We translated information on costs, benefits and risks obtained from the
500
expert workshop into mathematical equations. Code was developed by an
501
expert panel of three decision analysts (D. Lanzanova, C. Whitney and E.
502
Luedeling). Assumptions, model inputs, and the process definitions were
503
formulated beforehand. Formally, this phase included four steps.
504
• Step 1: Specification of input variables. Based on the conceptual model
505
(Fig. 5), we stated the appropriate input information to run the model,
506
either estimated by the experts or computer-generated, as well as the
507
output results (Fig. 6). All input variables were estimated by experts except
508
some general, rather specific parameters such as the project time horizon,
509
the coefficient of variation or the discount factor (supplementary material,
510
section 1.4). Time-series of intermediate variables were generated from
511
these input parameters in order to introduce variability in estimates and
512
randomness in risk realization. Final outputs of Monte Carlo simulation
513
were obtained using the decisonSupport package for R (see step 3 for
515
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
514
RI PT
498
details on process functions).
27
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
516
Figure 6. Input-Output diagram of the simulation model of decisions to implement
518
dredging, rock dams and buffer scheme interventions, as well as all their combinations, to
519
reduce sedimentation in the Lagdwenda reservoir in Burkina Faso. Process functions are
520
detailed in Step 3.
521
• Step 2: Definition of assumptions
EP
TE D
517
We made several assumptions regarding costs, land management,
523
representation of the sedimentation processes and interventions
524 525 526
AC C
522
effectiveness.
-
Total spending costs for an intervention depend on the realization of exante risks, as well as the type of intervention itself. Generally, if an ex-
527
ante risk occurs, the project is not implemented and only study costs
528
apply. Specifically, some ex-ante risks could be irrelevant (e.g. risk of
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
529
non-involvement of donors for dredging) and are not considered in that
530
case (supplementary material, section 2.1.1).
531
-
Crop land allocation in the irrigation scheme downstream is assumed to remain unchanged following an intervention. Potential behavioral
533
adjustments by farmers (e.g. new cropping choice in reaction to a
534
change in the water resource available) are not considered. -
The effect of sedimentation on water storage capacity is modeled as a
SC
535
RI PT
532
decline in irrigable area over time. The total irrigable area (area that can
537
be irrigated given the water stock in the reservoir) follows a sigmoid
538
function. It is likely to be the largest in the first two years, then
539
gradually decreases until half of the area is able to receive irrigation
540
water (supplementary material, section 2.3.5) -
The effect of sedimentation on the functioning of the irrigation system is
TE D
541
M AN U
536
modeled as a reduction in the irrigated area due to an obstruction of
543
pipes by sediments that prevent the scheme from being watered. As for
544
the water storage, the decline in the irrigated area follows a sigmoid
545
function: blockages are likely to be rare for a few years but gradually
547 548
AC C
546
EP
542
become more frequent until the irrigation pipes are no longer operational (supplementary material, section 2.3.6).
-
Interventions mitigate the sedimentation effects both regarding the
549
water storage capacity and the functioning of the irrigation system.
550
Formally, the impact of an intervention is modeled as delays in the
551
decrease of the reservoir capacity to store water or in the decline of the 29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
552
irrigated area because of clogged pipes, as well as in the chance for the
553
pipes to be cleared (supplementary material, sections 2.3.5 and 2.3.6).
555
• Step 3: Selection of functional specifications
RI PT
554
556
As introduced in Figure 6, we used several functions from the R
557
decisionSupport package (Luedeling & Goehring, 2017).
558
-
SC
The chance_event() function was used for random simulation of ex-ante risks as impacts on the implementation of interventions and of ex-post
560
risks as impacts on the benefits (supplementary material, section 2.1)
561
-
M AN U
559
The value varier vv() function was used to introduce variation in timeseries of variables that are assumed to vary over time. The function was
563
applied to ex-ante risks and for simulation of common random draws
564
for all intervention model runs (supplementary material, section 2.2)
565
-
TE D
562
The Gompertz_yield() function was used to simulate the loss in water storage capacity (“irrigable area”), the loss of irrigated area (because of
567
the obstruction of pipes), as well as the delays in these two
568
sedimentation outcomes as a result of the implementation of an
569
intervention. It was also applied for other minor benefits such as
571 572
AC C
570
EP
566
mitigation of the decline in fish in the reservoir (supplementary material, sections 2.3.5 and 2.3.6).
-
The discount() function was used to calculate the net present value
573
which is the sum of the discounted values of the time series of net
574
benefits (supplementary material, sections 2.3.6.1). 30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
575
-
The decisionSupport() function was used to perform the welfare decision analysis via a Monte Carlo simulation from input variables and
577
to analyze the value of information from these variables
578
(supplementary material, sections 3.1).
RI PT
576
Step 4: Validation of the model. Acceptance of the model assumptions,
580
process flow, choice of specifications and input parameters implies a
581
validation of the decision analysts’ model. To the extent possible, feedback on
582
the emerging code was elicited from the experts involved in building the
583
conceptual model.
584
The complete model code, as well as a detailed explanation of its components
585
can be found in the supplementary materials.
586
3.2 Simulation results
587
3.2.1 Projected intervention outcomes and synergies
588
Net Present Values projected for the various options varied widely (Figure 7),
589
reflecting high uncertainty about many input variables. However, some
592
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
579
593
though all options also incurred a risk of negative net outcomes.
594
Among single interventions, dredging appeared to have the lowest potential
595
for benefits, but also the lowest risk of negative outcomes, followed by rock
590 591
indications about overall risks and expected benefit levels could be obtained.
All intervention options, and all their combinations, had positive expected values, indicating that all options promised greater benefits than inaction,
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
dams (Figure 7). Due to relatively high up-front costs, buffer strips had the
597
greatest potential for net losses, but they also promised the highest returns
598
among the three options. An intervention that combines all three options
599
looks most promising, in terms of expected value, risk of losses and potential
600
returns.
601
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
596
Figure 7. Distributions of projected outcomes of decisions to implement dredging, rock
603
dams and buffer scheme interventions, as well as all their combinations, to reduce
604
sedimentation in the Lagdwenda reservoir in Burkina Faso.
606 607 608
AC C
605
EP
602
A careful examination of the simulation values (Table 1) provides more
detailed insights. Even though dredging alone was found to be a viable low risk/low return option, it was inferior in all respects (all NPV quantiles, as well
609
as the risk of losses) to an intervention that combined dredging with rock
610
dams. A similar picture emerged for rock dams implemented in isolation, 32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
which promised lower returns and greater risks than a combination of rock
612
dams and dredging. Both rock dams and dredging implemented alone can thus
613
be excluded as candidates for the optimal sediment management strategy,
614
regardless of the decision-maker’s perception of risk. However, combining
615
interventions, rather than implementing only single ones, may generate
616
synergies and thus promise greater benefits and lower risks than single
617
interventions (Table 1).
SC
RI PT
611
M AN U
618 619
Table 1: Lower and upper bounds of 90% confidence intervals (i.e. 5% and 95%
620
quantiles), median and mean (in USD) or the NPV distribution for different combinations of
621
reservoir protection interventions and probability of loss (in USD) for the different
622
interventions to reduce sedimentation in the Lagdwenda reservoir in Burkina Faso.
Dredging Rock dams
5% quantile
95% quantile
Median
mean
Probability of loss
-112373
284780
42458
46165
0.1306
TE D
Intervention options
-150328
362929
39748
46576
0.2545
-205929
833868
52285
84972
0.3611
-102018
565771
64233
76142
0.1070
Dredging and buffer strips
-232082
842954
74432
104937
0.1819
Rock dams and buffer strips
-244915
826407
67109
90969
0.2449
Dredging, rock dams and buffer strips
-248294
886126
80124
101924
0.2004
Buffer strips
624 625
AC C
623
EP
Dredging and rock dams
A decision maker’s perception of an investment depends both on its risk/return characteristics and on the investor’s degree of risk aversion. The
626
selection of an optimal intervention is therefore related to the preferences of
627
the decision-maker. The exception to this rule is when an option is strongly
628
dominant in all aspects, but this does not apply here. Among all intervention 33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
options, the combination of dredging and buffer strips and the combination of
630
all three options appear to be most efficient. Associating dredging and buffer
631
strips looks slightly less risky, but the combination of the three options
632
promises a higher median return, and a greater expected value. The group of
633
experts also preferred this option. Therefore, we will only present results for
634
this option below.
635
3.2.2 Projected intervention outcomes and value of information
636
Our decision analysis approach produces two outputs related to the return on
637
investment – the probability distribution for the net present value (NPV) and
638
the annual cash flow (Figures 8a and 8b). We also provide information on the
639
most influential uncertainties regarding the overall magnitude of the NPV –
640
the VIP statistic of Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression – and regarding the
641
emerging decision recommendation – the EVPI. These outputs are presented
642
for the combined intervention consisting of dredging, rock dams and buffer
643
strips (Figure 8).
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
644
RI PT
629
34
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 8. Outputs of a Monte Carlo simulation (with 10,000 model runs) for ex-ante
647
analysis of the decision to implement an intervention consisting of dredging, rock dams
648
and a buffer scheme to reduce sedimentation in the Lagdwenda reservoir in Burkina Faso.
649
a) projected distribution of net present value (NPV) for the intervention (with 100%, 90%,
650
50% and 10% confidence intervals shown by shades of purple); b) probability distribution
652 653 654
AC C
651
EP
645 646
of annual cash flow; c) sensitivity of projected outcomes to uncertain input variables, quantified by the VIP statistic of PLS regression (colors indicate positive (green) and negative (red) input/output relationships); d) Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) for all variables with non-zero EVPI (only one variable in this case).
655
35
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Monte Carlo simulation revealed a wide range of plausible outcomes for the
657
intervention’s NPV. Positive outcomes are likely (80.0%), but results also
658
showed a significant chance of loss (20.0%). The total net present value (over
659
30 years) is likely to be between -64 thousand and 338 thousand USD (the 5th
660
and 95th percentiles of the distribution), with a mean value of 102 thousand
661
USD (Figure 8a).
662
The cash flow analysis illustrated that substantial initial investments are
663
needed (Figure 8b) for implementing the intervention. Accordingly, the
664
expected cash flow in year 1 was negative, with a 90% confidence interval
665
between -300 and -53 thousand USD. From year three, cash flow analysis
666
shows predominantly positive annual net revenue prospects, ranging between
667
-5 and 24 thousand USD. The cash flow stabilized around its highest level
668
(median of 17 thousand USD) towards the end of the time series, emphasizing
669
the viability of this intervention as an effective long-term strategy. Annual
670
benefits appeared quite predictable, with a fairly narrow distribution and little
671
variation over time.
672
3.2.3 Important uncertainties
674
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
656
675
total of 15 variables had VIP scores exceeding 0.8 – a threshold that is often
676
interpreted as signifying importance (Eriksson et al., 2001). The most
673
The sensitivity analysis (implemented by PLS regression) indicated that a number of input variables had important effects on the NPV (Figure 8c). A
36
influential variable was the profit on a ton of vegetables in the downstream
678
irrigation scheme, followed by the discount rate (Figure 8c).
679
The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) can be expressed in
680
monetary terms as the decision-maker’s willingness to pay to gain access to
681
perfect information (Hubbard, 2014). Decision analysis typically reveals that
682
the decision recommendation can only be influenced by a very small number
683
of uncertain variables, with many others affecting the projected NPV, but not
684
its sign (e.g. Wafula et al., 2018). This, however, is the only important criterion
685
to a decision-maker choosing the optimal option. In the present case, only a
686
single variable – the profitability of vegetable production in the downstream
687
irrigation scheme – had a non-zero EVPI (Figure 8d). Even for this variable,
688
the EVPI was only around 1,100 USD, which is low compared to the overall
689
value of the intervention. This implies that even with the initial state of
690
knowledge, a relatively confident recommendation can be made, but that a
691
small investment in obtaining more information on the economics of
692
vegetable production downstream from the reservoir would be justified by
693
increasing certainty about the decision.
694
695
Here we have demonstrated the application of Decision Analysis techniques to
696
support practical decisions in the face of risk and uncertainty. Its principle is
697
to provide customized analysis for a particular decision context (Howard and
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
677
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4 Discussion
37
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Abbas 2016). This would likely mean that a different set of variables would
699
emerge as important for other reservoirs. In the case of Lagdwenda, the most
700
critical information for decision-making regards the profit per ton of vegetable
701
and the yields of the different crops. This information, especially concerning
702
yields, is highly context specific.
703
In comparison with the physical empirical models that are commonly used to
704
evaluate intervention impacts on sedimentation, which are usually
705
deterministic and restricted to consideration of physical system dimensions
706
(Uusitalo, 2015), our modeling approach has two major advantages: First, it
707
allows doing justice to the considerable importance of political and social
708
factors that are often major determinants of intervention impacts
709
(Holzkämper, 2012). Second, it recognizes that uncertainty is present at every
710
step of an environmental management analysis (Refsgaard, 2007), allowing
711
incorporation of such uncertainties into probabilistic models.
712
The extent to which a strategy is preferred over another depends on many
713
factors, including both its costs (investments, implementation) and its
714
benefits, which in the case of Lagdwenda are mainly the value of the
716
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
715
RI PT
698
agricultural output over a period of time (in our case 30 years). Costs are generally based on technical information (such that can be provided by
717
engineers), whereas benefits depend on a number of uncertain agricultural
718
and economic factors (e.g. profit per ha, discount rate). The use of the holistic
719
modeling techniques described here can help decision-makers consider the 38
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
uncertainties instead of making decisions based only on the available technical
721
information.
722
Despite being considered the most effective technical solution to prevent
723
sedimentation (Kondolf et al., 2014; Palmieri et al., 2001; Schmengler, 2011),
724
buffer strips were not the dominant option, mainly because of the high initial
725
costs of implementation. This illustrates the discrepancy between the
726
technical optimum and the best economic option for solving a problem. All
727
intervention options, and all their combinations had positive expected values,
728
indicating that all options promised greater benefits than inaction, though all
729
options also incurred a risk of negative net outcomes. In the context of
730
Lagdwenda, sedimentation can be controlled most effectively when several
731
interventions are implemented simultaneously. Synergies are generated
732
through the interactions of the different interventions, and the extra costs are
733
more than offset by the benefits of the reduction in sedimentation. This is
734
explained by the non-linear impacts of siltation on farmers’ irrigation system.
735
Sediments that originate from erosion of the reservoir shores and from the
736
main inlets interact with each other and result in amplified effects (e.g.
738
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
737
RI PT
720
threshold effects in the clogging of irrigation pipes, which makes them
inoperable after a certain amount of sedimentation.
739
Assessment of the Value of Information was useful in identifying and
740
addressing critical uncertainties in the model. The EVPI helps to focus
741
research and decrease overall uncertainty about which decision option to 39
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
choose. This capability makes the EVPI a useful addition to a wide range of
743
decision processes. In the case of Lagdwenda, uncertainties arise
744
predominantly regarding the value of benefits (Figure 8). The two most
745
important uncertainties are the profit per ton of vegetables (with a positive
746
information value) and the discount rate. Many of the important parameters,
747
such as yield and profit, depend mainly on exogenous factors, e.g. price,
748
macroeconomic policy and evolution of inflation. Consequently, it could be
749
challenging (or impossible) to gather reliable information on them, especially
750
for a longer time horizon such as the one used in this model. The uncertainties
751
exposed by the VIP analysis may offer insights into where decision makers
752
may want to conduct further technical research, but such a decision should
753
take external constraints into account.
754
Through the use of the EVPI analysis, we were able to determine decision-
755
critical uncertainties, the reduction of which could help to narrow uncertainty
756
about how the decision should be taken. EVPI (Figure 8d) values are low, and
757
only the profit per ton of vegetables has a non-zero value. This means that
758
uncertainty could be reduced by taking measurements on the profits from
761
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
742
762
supporting research does not have to eliminate all uncertainty, but can focus
763
on a few key pieces of information.
759 760
crop production. However, this may not even be necessary, since the low EVPI
and the low chance of loss (20%) indicate that the combined intervention should be preferred over inaction. This demonstrates how decision-
40
5 Conclusion
765
Sedimentation in Lagdwenda’s reservoir impacts the reliability of irrigation
766
and thereby the livelihoods of local people, a problem that is common for
767
small-scale reservoirs in the Upper Volta. This problem requires a sediment
768
management strategy that is appropriate to the local context. Development of
769
such a strategy is hindered by data scarcity for many important variables.
770
Decision analysis approaches allow comprehensive ex-ante assessment of the
771
effectiveness of intervention options through collaborative development of
772
impact pathway models. Data limitations are addressed through probabilistic
773
simulation, for which all variables are expressed as probability distributions,
774
and decision-critical knowledge gaps are highlighted by sensitivity analysis
775
and Value of Information analysis.
776
A combination of all three candidate interventions – dredging, rock dams and
777
buffer strips – emerged as the most effective management strategy, with a
778
relatively low chance of losses and long-lasting net benefits for local
779
communities. The magnitude of net benefits depended on several uncertain
780 781 782
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
764
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
variables, but only a single variable – the profitability of vegetable production in the downstream irrigation scheme – had positive information value. In consequence, a relatively confident recommendation can be provided to
783
decision-makers, even in the face of multiple uncertainties. In addition to this,
784
the analysis revealed that most of the residual uncertainty about whether the
41
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
intervention is worth doing can be addressed through limited measurements
786
on just one variable, which is probably quite easy to measure.
787
Coupling local knowledge systems with rigorous simulation techniques, our
788
methodology provides actionable information for robust decision-making. The
789
model is grounded on the knowledge of local experts and stakeholders who
790
provided a unique understanding of the socio-ecological system that could not
791
have been obtained with traditional disciplinary approaches.
792
6 Acknowledgements
793
This research was supported by the CGIAR Water, Land and Ecosystems
794
research project on Targeting Agricultural Innovations and Ecosystem
795
Services in the Northern Volta river basin (TAI). The authors are grateful to
796
the members of the panel of experts: Daouda Sorgho (Lagdwenda farmers’
797
association), Sorgho Salif (local water committee of Lagdwenda), Ismaël Paré
798
(Provincial department of agriculture and hydraulic infrastructures), Modi
799
Diallo (Provincial department of environment, green economy and climate
800
change), Sambyamba Séraphin Zongo (Nakambé water agency), Barnabé
802 803
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
801
RI PT
785
Romuald Konseiga (ECR construction company), Mohamed Wendegoudi Ouédraogo (voluntary association for the promotion of leadership, health and development AJVLS) and Mansour Boundaogo (SNV World).
42
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References
805
Aidan, L., Bonnie, C.W., Mark, B., 2015. Collective wisdom: Methods of
806
confidence interval aggregation. Journal of Business Research 68, 1759–1767.
807
Allan, J., Samantha, L.C., Kerrie, M., 2010. Elicitator: An expert elicitation tool
808
for regression in ecology. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 129–145.
809
Amisigo, B., McCluskey, A., Swanson, R., 2015. Modeling impact of climate
810
change on water resources and agriculture demand in the Volta basin and
811
other basin systems in Ghana. Sustainability 7, 6957-6975.
812
Barbier, B., Ouedraogo, H., Dembele, Y., Yacouba, H., Boubacar, B., Jamin, J.-Y.,
813
2011. L’agriculture irriguée dans le sahel ouest-africain. Cah Agric 20.
814
Bezold, C., 2009. Aspirational futures. Journal of Futures Studies 13, 81–90.
815
Bharati, L., Rodgers, C., Erdenberger, T., Plotnikova, M., Shumilov, S., Vlek, P. et
816
al., 2008. Integration of economic and hydrologic models: Exploring
817
conjunctive irrigation water use strategies in the Volta basin. Agricultural
818
Water Management 95, 925–936.
819
Birner, R., McCarty, N., Robertson, R., Waale, D., Schiffer, E., 2010. Increasing
821
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
820
RI PT
804
access to irrigation: lessons learned from Investing in small reservoirs in Ghana. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Accra, Ghana.
822
Bolger, F., Wright, G., 2017. Use of expert knowledge to anticipate the future:
823
Issues, analysis and directions. International Journal of Forecasting 33(1),
824
230-243. 43
Boelee, E., Yohannes, M., Poda, J.-N., McCartney, M., Cecchi, P., Kibret, S. et al.,
826
2013. Options for water storage and rainwater harvesting to improve health
827
and resilience against climate change in Africa. Regional Environmental
828
Change 13, 509–519.
829
Cecchi, P., Meunier-Nikiema, A., Moiroux, N., 2008. Towards an atlas of lakes
830
and reservoirs in Burkina Faso. Q13 IRD.
831
Chaudhary, A., Hantush, M.M., 2017. Bayesian Monte Carlo and maximum
832
likelihood approach for uncertainty estimation and risk management:
833
Application to lake oxygen recovery model. Water Research 108, 301-311.
834
Chitata, T., Mugabe, F.T., Kashaigili, J.J., 2014. Estimation of small reservoir
835
sedimentation in semi-arid southern Zimbabwe. Journal of Water Resource
836
and Protection 6, 1017–1028.
837
Cooper, P., Dimes, J., Rao, K., Shapiro, B., Shiferaw, B., Twomlow, S., 2008.
838
Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems
839
of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate
840
change? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 126, 24–35.
841
843 844
Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N., Wold, S. (2001). Multi- and
845
Megavariate Data Analysis: Principles and Applications. Umetrics Academy,
846
Umeå, Sweden.
842
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
825
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
David, E.M., Jeremy, E.O., John, A.C., 2014. A web-based tool for eliciting
probability distributions from experts. Environmental Modelling & Software 52, 1–4.
44
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fonseca, A., Ames, D.P., Yang, P., Botelho, C., Boaventura, R., Vilar, V., 2014.
848
Watershed model parameter estimation and uncertainty in data-limited
849
environments. Environmental Modelling & Software 51, 84-93.
850
Fred, A.J., Brian, J.S., Mathieu, B., Julien, M., Christina, R., Frank, M. et al., 2017.
851
Expert elicitation, uncertainty, and the value of information in controlling
852
invasive species. Ecological Economics 137, 83–90.
853
Gao, L., Bryan, B.A., 2017. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector
854
sustainability. Nature 544, 217–222.
855
Gao, L., Bryan, B.A., 2016. Incorporating deep uncertainty into the elementary
856
effects method for robust global sensitivity analysis. Ecological Modelling 321,
857
1-9.
858
Gao, L., Bryan, B.A., Nolan, M., Connor, J.D., Song, X., Zhao, G., 2016. Robust
859
global sensitivity analysis under deep uncertainty via scenario analysis.
860
Environmental Modelling & Software 76, 154-166.
861
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., 1995. How to improve bayesian reasoning without
862
instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102, 684–704.
864
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
863
RI PT
847
Gohar, A.A., Ward, F.A., Amer, S.A., 2013. Economic performance of water storage capacity expansion for food security. Journal of Hydrology 484, 16–25.
865
Griffin, M.L., Beasley, D.B., Fletcher, J.J., Foster, G.R., 1988. Estimating soil loss
866
on topographically non-uniform field and farm units. Journal of Soil and Water
867
Conservation 43, 326-333. 45
Holzkämper, A., Kumar, V., Surridge, B.W.J., Paetzold, A., Lerner, D.N., 2012.
869
Bringing diverse knowledge sources together – A meta-model for supporting
870
integrated catchment management. Journal of Environmental Management 96,
871
116-127
872
Howard, R.A., Abbas, A.E., 2016. Foundations of decision analysis. Prentice
873
Hall, NY.
874
Hubbard, D.W., 2014. How to measure anything: Finding the value of
875
intangibles in business. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
876
Hubbard, D., Millar, M. 2014. Modeling resilience with applied information
877
economics. Report prepared by the Technical Consortium, a project of the
878
CGIAR. Technical Report Series No 1: Measuring Resilience in the Horn of
879
Africa, 24p. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
880
Ilan, Y., 2004. Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit.
881
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 93, 1–13.
882
Jain, S.K., Kumar, S., Varghese, J., 2001. Estimation of soil erosion for a
883
Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resources Management 15,
884 885 886
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
868
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
41-54.
Janis, I.L., 1972. Victims of groupthink. Houghton Mifflin, New York. Jonathan, J.K., 1993. The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of
887
evidence quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 56,
888
28–55.
46
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Katic, P., Morris, J., 2016. Targeting investments in small-scale groundwater
890
irrigation using Bayesian networks for a data-scarce river basin in Sub-
891
Saharan Africa. Environmental Modelling & Software 82, 44-72.
892
Kattwinkel, M., Reichert, P., 2017. Bayesian parameter inference for
893
individual-based models using a Particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo method.
894
Environmental Modelling & Software 87, 110-119.
895
Kondolf, G.M., Gao, Y., Annandale, G.W., Morris, G.L., Jiang, E., Zhang, J. et al.,
896
2014. Sustainable sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers:
897
Experiences from five continents. Earth’s Future 2, 256–280.
898
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., Phillips, L.D., 1982. Calibration of probabilities:
899
The state of the art to 1980. Cambridge University Press, New York.
900
Luedeling, E., Goehring, L., 2017. DecisionSupport – quantitative support of
901
decision making under uncertainty. Contributed package to the r
902
programming language. Version 1.103.2.
903
Luedeling, E., Shepherd, K., 2016. Decision-focused agricultural research.
904
Solutions 7, 46–54.
SC
M AN U
TE D
AC C
EP
907 908
Frontiers in Environmental Science 3, 241.
905 906
RI PT
889
Luedeling, E., Oord, A.L., Kiteme, B., Ogalleh, S., Malesu, M., Shepherd, K.D. et al.,
2015. Fresh groundwater for Wajir ex-ante assessment of uncertain benefits for multiple stakeholders in a water supply project in northern Kenya.
47
Luedeling, E., Gassner, A., 2012. Partial Least Squares regression for analyzing
910
walnut phenology in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 158, 43–
911
52.
912
Luedeling, E., Whitney, C., Lanzanova, D., 2018, Reservoir management in
913
Burkina Faso - decision analysis repository. Harvard Dataverse,
914
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/4RAKHX.
915
Morgan, M. G., 2014. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of
916
decision making for public policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of
917
Sciences of the United States of America 111 (20), 7176–7184.
918
Morris, G.L., Fan, J., 1998. Reservoir Sedimentation Handbook: Design and
919
Management of Dams, Reservoirs, and Watersheds for Sustainable Use.
920
McGraw-Hill Professional.
921
Maier, N.R.F., Hoffman, L.R., 1960. Using trained developmental discussion
922
leaders to improve further the quality of group decisions. Journal of Applied
923
Psychology 44, 247–251.
924
Martin, T.G., Burgman, M.A., Fidler, F., Kuhnert, P.M., Low-Choy, S., McBride, M.
925
927 928
communicating and incorporating scientific uncertainty in climate decision
929
making. A Report by the Climate Change Science Program and the
926
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
909
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
et al., 2012. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Blackwell
Publishing Inc.
Morgan, M.G., 2009. Best practice approaches for characterizing,
48
Subcommittee on Global Change Research. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
931
Administration, Washington, DC, 96 pp.
932
Oakley, J.E., Brennan, A., Tappenden, P. and Chilcott, J., 2010. Simulation
933
sample sizes for Monte Carlo partial EVPI calculations. Journal of health
934
economics, 29, 468–477.
935
Omisore, A.G., 2017. Attaining Sustainable Development Goals in sub-Saharan
936
Africa; the need to address environmental challenges. Environmental
937
Development (In Press, Accepted Manuscript).
938
Palmieri, A., Shah, F., Dinar, A., 2001. Economics of reservoir sedimentation
939
and sustainable management of dams. Journal of Environnmental
940
Management 61, 149–163.
941
Pannell, D.J., Glenn, N.A., 2000. A framework for the economic evaluation and
942
selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics 33,
943
135–149.
944
Poussin, J.-C., Renaudin, L., Adogoba, D., Sanon, A., Tazen, F., Dogbe, W. et al.,
945
2015. Performance of small reservoir irrigated schemes in the Upper Volta
946
948 949
Macmillan Publishing Company.
950
Qian, S.S., Stow, C.A., Borsuk, M.E., 2003. On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian
951
inference. Ecol. Model 159, 269-277.
947
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
930
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
basin: Case studies in Burkina-Faso and Ghana. Water Resources and Rural Development 6, 50–65. Proakis, J.G., Manolakis, D.G., 1992. Digital Signal Processing. New York:
49
R Core Team, 2017. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
953
R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
954
Rayner, S., 2012. Uncomfortable knowledge: The social construction of
955
ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses. Economy and
956
Society 41, 107–125.
957
Refsgaard, J.C., van der Sluijs, J.P., Højberg, A.L., Vanrolleghem, P.A., 2007.
958
Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process e a framework and
959
guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software 22, 1543-1556.
960
Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., McCool, D.K., Yoder, D.C., 1997.
961
Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the
962
revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook 703,
963
United States Department of Agriculture.
964
Rosenstock, T.S., Mpanda, M., Rioux, J., Aynekulu, E., Kimaro, A.A., Neufeldt, H.
965
et al., 2014. Targeting conservation agriculture in the context of livelihoods
966
and landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 187, 47–51.
967
Salas, J.D., Shin, H.S., 1999. Uncertainty analysis of reservoir sedimentation.
968
970 971
90, 265–277.
969
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
952
AC C
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 125, 339-350. Samantha, L.C., Rebecca, O., Kerrie, M., 2009. Elicitation by design in ecology: Using expert opinion to inform priors for bayesian statistical models. Ecology
50
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Sanfo, S., Gérard, F., 2012. Public policies for rural poverty alleviation: The
973
case of agricultural households in the plateau central area of Burkina Faso.
974
Agricultural Systems 110, 1–9.
975
Schleiss, A.J., Franca, M.J., Juez, C., De Cesare, G., 2016. Reservoir
976
sedimentation. Journal of Hydraulic Research 54 (6), 595-610.
977
Schmengler, A.C., 2011. Modeling soil erosion and reservoir sedimentation at
978
hillslope and catchment scale in semi-arid Burkina Faso. PhD thesis.
979
University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
980
Soll, J.B., Klayman, J., 2004. Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of
981
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, 299–314.
982
Stirling, A., 2010. Keep it complex. Nature 468, 1029–1031.
983
Strong, M., Oakley, J.E., Brennan, A., 2014. Estimating multiparameter partial
984
expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis
985
sample: A nonparametric regression approach. Medical Decision Making 34,
986
311–326.
987
Tigrek, S., Göbelez, O., Aras, T., 2009. Sustainable management of reservoirs
990
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
972
991
41–53.
992
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and
993
biases. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
988 989
and preservation of water quality, in: El Moujabber, M., Mandi, L., TrisorioLiuzzi, G., Martín, I., Rabi, A., Rodríguez, R. (Eds.), Technological perspectives for rational use of water resources in the Mediterranean region, CIHEAM, Bari,
51
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Uusitalo, L., Lehikoinen, A., Helle, I., Myrberg, K., 2015. An overview of
995
methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support,
996
Environmental Modelling & Software 63, 24-31
997
Venot, J.-P., Cecchi, P., 2011. Valeurs d’usage ou performances techniques :
998
Comment apprécier le rôle des petits barrages en Afrique subsaharienne ? Cah
999
Agric 20, 112–117.
Venot, J.-P., Hirvonen, M., 2013. Enduring controversy: Small reservoirs in sub-
1001
Saharan Africa. Society & Natural Resources 26, 883–897.
1002
Wafula. J., Karimjee, Y., Tamba, Y., Malava, G., Muchiri, C., Koech, G., De Leeuw,
1003
J., Nyongesa, J., Shepherd, K., Luedeling, E., 2018. Probabilistic Assessment of
1004
Investment Options in Honey Value Chains in Lamu County, Kenya. Frontiers
1005
in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 4, article 6, 1-11.
1006
Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses - a
1007
Guide to Conservation Planning.
1008
Wisser, D., Frolking, S., Douglas, E.M., Fekete, B.M., Schumann, A.H.,
1009
Vörösmarty, C.J., 2010. The significance of local water resources captured in
1010
1012 1013
Krawinkel, M., Tabuti, J.R.S., Luedeling, E. (2017). Impact pathways from
1014
agricultural development policy to household nutrition in Uganda. Manuscript
1015
under review.
1011
EP
TE D
M AN U
1000
AC C
SC
RI PT
994
small reservoirs for crop production – a global-scale analysis. Journal of
Hydrology 384, 264–275. Whitney, C.W., Lanzanova, D., Muchiri, C., Shepherd, K.D., Rosenstock, T.S.,
52
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Wold, S., 1995. PLS for multivariate linear modeling. In: van der Waterbeemd,
1017
H. (Ed.), Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design: Methods and Principles
1018
in Medicinal Chemistry, Verlag-Chemie, Weinheim, Germany, 195–218.
1019
Wood, S.A., Jina, A.S., Jain, M., Kristjanson, P., DeFries, R.S., 2014. Smallholder
1020
farmer cropping decisions related to climate variability across multiple
1021
regions. Global Environmental Change 25, 163–172.
1022
World Bank, 2017. World Bank data, consulted the 5th of December 2017.
1023
.
1024
Yaniv, I., 2004. The Benefit of Additional Opinions. Current Directions in
1025
Psychological Science 13(2), 75-78.
1026
Yaniv, I., Foster, D.P., 1997. Precision and accuracy of judgmental estimation. J.
1027
Behav. Decis. Making 10, 21–32.
1028
Zheng, Y., Keller, A.A., 2007. Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water
1029
quality modeling and management: 1. Framework and application of
1030
generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach. Water
1031
Resour. Res. 43, W08407.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
1016
53
Highlights
RI PT SC M AN U TE D
• •
EP
•
A probabilistic decision model is used to compare interventions to prevent sedimentation of a reservoir in the Volta river basin. Decision Analysis is demonstrated as an approach that can generate robust actionable knowledge without the need to eliminate all uncertainty. Results show that sedimentation interventions are likely to be beneficial compared to inaction Combining interventions produces synergies and maximizes benefits of interventions
AC C
•
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT