785 MCF-7: A HUMAN BREAST CANCER CELL LINE WITH ESTROGEN, ANDROGEN, PROGESTERONE, AND GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTORS
K.B, Horwitz, M.E. Costlow, and W.L. McGuire
Department of Medicine University of Texas Health Science Center 7703 Floyd Curl Drive San Antonio, Texas 78284 .',eceivecl: g/24-/73 ABSTRACT We have identified receptors for glucocorticoids,progestins, and androgens in a human breast tumor cell line (MCF-7) known to have estrogen receptor. Sucrose density gradients show that MCF-7 cytosol contains approximately 100 fm/mg protein estradiol (E2-3H) receptor, more than 300 fm/mg protein progesterone receptor (measured with R5020-3H), about 40 fm/mg protein Sa-dihydrotestosterone (S~X-DHT-~H) receptor, and 800 fm/mg glucocorticoid receptor (measured with dexamethasone-3H). D' association constants obtained by Scatchard analyses were approximately 0.6 x 10-l"M (E2), 1 x 10egM (RSOZO), 2.8 x lo-1OM (Sa-DHT) and 8 x lo-SM (dexamethasone). No cross competition was found for estrogen receptor, but progestins competed for androgen and glucocorticoid binding. The androgen, but not the glucocorticoid,partially competed for R5020 binding to progesterone receptor. This first demonstration of 4 classes of steroid receptors in human breast cancer means that MCF-7 may be an excellent in vitro model for studying the mechanism of tumor response to endocr=etherapy as well as the complex relationships between binding and biological actions of these hormones.
INTRODUCTION Although 55 to 60% of estrogen receptor containing (ER+) human breast tumors respond to endocrine ablative or additive therapy, the growth of 40% of ER+ tumors is unaffected by endocrine manipulation (1)*
Because of this sizable predictive failure, we have speculated
that a more effective marker of an endocrine responsive tumor would be a product of hormone action, rather than the initial binding step. Progesterone receptor (PgR) may be such a marker (2) since in estrogen target tissues its synthesis is modulated by estrogen.
VoZwne 26, Nwnber 6
S
TREOXDU
December, 2975
S We have recently tumors
contain
endocrine
endocrine
we also
sought
is
the pleural.
have
While response
a stable of
whose disease substantial
responded
amounts of
should
also
have PgR if,
differentiated to
glucocorticoids
model
found
response
Culture
therapy
receptor
derived
long-term
for
cases,
studying
the
obtained
from
breast
(4) _
(5).
These
cells
Based on our
responsive
from such
culture,
all
four
yet
been
in rat
it
tumor
a tumor it has maintained
for
Conditions.
tumors
mammary tumors
known to line
(6).
for
cancer,
(7).
whether,
in addition
androgens influence
has potential
androgen
Receptors
in human breast
progesterone,
steroids cell
and progesterone,
described
to determine
the hormonal
endocrine
estrogen
in human breast
receptors
studying to
individual
metastatic
an ER+ hormone
for
we sought
in MCF-7, this for
that
MCF-7 is
are present
MCF-7 contained
present
to
correlation
originally
with
to hormone
after
have not
Consequently,
If
of
system
line
patient
estrogen
receptors
have been
ticoids.
the
respond
character.
In addition
they
model
ER+ breast
which will
establish
cell
a female
have PgR, and since
although
to
in vitro --
we would predict
receptors
fraction
and PgR in a series
epithelioid
should
its
that
55% of
PgR and hormone dependence.
effusion
hypothesis
approximately
attempting
an appropriate
of
MU-7
that
PgR, approximately
between
cancer
shown (3)
therapy.
relationship
IZPEOXDII
to ER,
and glucocor-
mammary function to be an excellent
interrelationships
involved
in tumor
therapy.
MCF-7 cells,
a gift
(Michigan Cancer foundation) were received
are
of
Dr. Herbert Soule
at passage
102 and have
been serially cultured in our laboratory for approximately one year. Cells were routinely subcultured (1:5) every 3 weeks using trypsin (0.125%)-EDTA (1 mM) in Ca++Mg++ free Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS). For the experiments described here, cells at passage number 117 to 124 were grown in Falcon plastic flasks (75 cm2) or in glass roller bottles (692 cm2). At confluency, flasks contained approximately 2 x lo7 cells, and bottles 1.6 x lo* cells. The cells were grown in 5% CO2 in air at 37'C in medium consisting of Earles-based minimal essential medium (MEM, Gibco), supplemented with non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 2mM L-glutamine, (Gibco), 0.006 ng/ml insulin (Sigma), 10% calf serum (Gibco) and 50 ug/ml gentamicin (Schering). Five days before use, growth medium was exchanged for medium containing 10% calf serum stripped of endogenous hormones by a 30 minute, 4'C incubation in a dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) pellet (0.25% Norit A, 0.0025% Dextran in 0.01 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1.5 ml/ml serum). Hydrocortisone (14 ng/ml), estradiol (27 ng/ml), insulin (6 ng/ml), ovine prolactin (1 ug/ml) and 0.1% bovine serum albumin were also added. 18 hours before the cells were assayed, this medium was replaced by MEM containing 10% stripped calf serum and insulin. Cytosol Preparation. Cells were washed with Ca++-Mg++ free HBSS, then scraped from flasks with perforated cellophane (Microbiological Associates) and pooled, or detached from glass bottles with a 15 minute, 37OC incubation in Ca++-Mg++ free HBSS containing 1 mM EDTA. The cells were then chilled to 4"C, washed twice in HBSS without EDTA, once in homogenization buffer, and resuspended in 2 packed cell volumes of buffer. The homogenization buffer (PG buffer), prepared immediately before use, was 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4 at 4OC, containing 1 mM thioglycerol and 10% glycerol (8). Cells were homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer (Kontes) using the B pestle, until they were more than 90% disrupted and clean nuclei were seen by phase contrast microscopy (30-50 strokes). Cytosol was harvested from the cellular debris by centrifugation for 50 minutes at 40,000 rpm (105,000 xg), 4'C, with a Beckman 75 Ti rotor. Cytosol protein concentration was estimated by measurement of its OD at 2601280 nm (9) and measured by the method of Lowry -et al (10). Sucrose Gradients. R5020 (17,21-dimethyl-19-nor-4,9-pregnadiene-3, 20-dione-6,7-SH, 51.4 Ci/m mol, Roussel-UCLAF). dexamethasone (9-fluoro-~l~,l~a,21-trihydrox~-16a-methyl-1,~~pregnadiene-3, 20-dione-1,2,4-3H; 10 Ci/m mol, Schwartz/Mann), estradiol-178-2,4,6, 7-3H (114 Ci/m mol, New England Nuclear) or 5a-dihydrotestosterone1,2,4,5,6,7- 3H (175 Ci/m mol, Amersham-Searle) were added in 2 ul ethanol to 250 ~1 cytosol and incubated for 4 hours at 4'C. Parallel samples were preincubated for 15 minutes with 100 fold excess unlabeled hormone (progesterone,R5020, diethylstilbestrol [4,4'-dihydroxy-a, 8-diethylstilbene],dexamethasone, or 5a-dihydrotestosterone)added in 1 ul ethanol. Pellets were prepared from a 1 ml suspension of DCC by a 10 minute centrifugation at 3200 rpm (2000 g). The charged cytosol was transferred onto the pellet, mixed, and incubated 15 min
at 4OC to adsorb unbound radioactivity, After recentrifugation for 10 minutes at 3200 rpm, a 200 ~1 aliquot of the supernatant was layered onto a 5 to 20 percent sucrose gradient prepared in the homogenization buffer. Bovine serum albumin-14C (ll), 1500 cpm/lO ul buffer was added to each gradient as an internal marker. Gradients were centrifuged in a Beckman SW56 rotor at 50,000 rpm (246,000 g,,) for 17 hours. Four drop fractions were collected and counted in 5 ml modified Bray's solution (12). Scatchard Analysis. Saturation kinetics of estradiol and dexamethasone binding were determined using the dextran-coated charcoal method (13). 200 ul cytosol prepared as above was incubated with increasing quantities of 3H-hormone added in 50 ul PG buffer. Parallel incubations contained excess nonradioactive hormone. After 16 hours (estradiol) or 4 hours (dexamethasone)of incubation at 4OC, 0.5 ml of the charcoal suspension was added, and the mixture was vigorously shaken for 30 minutes in an Eberbach shaker (estradiol) or mixed and incubated 15 minutes (dexamethasone). The charcoal was sedimented with a 10 minute, 3200 rpm centrifugation, and an aliquot of the supernatant was counted in 5 ml Bray's solution. The data was analyzed according to Scatchard (14), after subtraction of nonspecific binding calculated from the preparations competed with nonradioactive hormone. Kinetics of R5020 and So-dihydrostestosteronebinding were assayed using protamine precipitated receptor (15). Acid washed 12 x 75 mm glass tubes were incubated at 30' for 10 minutes with 1 ml PG buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. The tubes were then rinsed with 1 ml ice-cold PG buffer, and subsequent procedures were carried out at 0' unless otherwise stated. Protamine sulfate (LJSP injection, without phenol preservative, Eli Lilly Co.) was diluted to 1 mg/ml in PG buffer and 250 ul was added to each tube. After addition of 200 ul cytosol, the mixtures were vortexed and the precipitates were sedimented by centrifugation at 2000 g for 10 minutes. The precipitated receptors were incubated with 'H-hormone of increasing concentrations added in 500 1.11 PG buffer. Parallel incubations contained lOO-fold excess unlabeled hormone. Tubes were incubated at 4'C for 4 hours (progesterone)or 16 hours (androgen), then washed three times with 1 ml cold PG buffer. Bound radioactivity was extracted twice with 1 ml 100% ethanol at room temperature. The extracts were dried in scintillation vials and counted in 5 ml fluor (4.0 gm PPO, 0.05 gm POPOP, 1 liter toluene) in a Beckman LS233 counter. The data was analyzed as above.
RESULTS We have used the synthetic steroids R5020 and dexamethasone to measure progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors because they do not bind to corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG) (16, 17), a
component of the serum used in the cells' growth medium. The fact that specific receptors sedimented primarily at 8s while CBG sediments only at 45 also aids in distinguishing the two types of binding. Although estradiol and dihydrotestosteronecan also bind to a high affinity serum protein (sex steroid binding globulin [SBG]) which sediments at 4S, no such binding appeared in MCF-7
cytosols. We
therefore used the natural sex hormones to measure high affinity cytoplasmic receptors. After a year of serial trypsin passages in our laboratory the MCF-7 cell line retained estrogen receptor (Fig. 1). The number of sites as determined from sucrose gradients was more than 100 fm/mg cytosol protein. This value is slightly higher than the 63 fm/mg originally described (4). The dissociation constant (Kd) was 0.57 x 10-1°M (Fig. 2) , 50 times lower than that reported by Brooks et al (5). This --
lower Kd more nearly approximates the average value
obtained in human breast tumors (1). We have found that MCF-7 has, in addition, receptors for the other steroid hormones known to control mammary gland function (Fig. 1). The cells contained more than 300 fm/mg protein progesterone receptor, measured with R5020-3H (or progesterone-3H, data not shown), about 40 fm/mg androgen receptor, and over 800 fm/mg glucocorticoid receptor. Scatchard plots of the specific binding are shown in figure 2.
The Kd for R5020 was approximately 1.1 x lO_gM,
for DHT was
2.8 x lo-I'M and for dexamethasone was 8.1 x 10s9M. To demonstrate that 4 distinct classes of receptors were being measured, each hormone was used as a competitor for the others (Table 1).
s
790
WDmOXDI
c\
R-5020
4
0
1
IO
I
20
I
IO
TOP
20
TOP
DEX
I
TOP FRACTION NUMBER
IO
1
20 FRACTION NUMBER
1
TOP
Figure 1. Estrogen, progesterone, androgen and glucocorticoid receptors in MCF-7. Sucrose density gradients of cell cytosols (3.45 to 7.50 mg/ml protein) were incubated with estradiol-176-3H (4 x lo-DM), R5020-3H (2 x lO_SM), 5a-dihydrotestosterone-3H (DHT, 2 x 10m8M) or dexamethasone-3H (5 x lo-SM), in the presence (0) or absence (0) of 100 fold unlabeled The arrow indicates diethylstilbestrol, R5020, DHT or dexamethasone. 4.6s sedimentation of bovine serum albumin -14C.
I
0
,
t
0.02 Cl04 0.06 B R-5020 Wl)
B ESTRADIOL (nM)
0.12
0.08
0.04
-I-
I
1
I
0.02 0.04 0.06 B DHT (nM)
O
k m0
I
0.6 B DEX (nM)
I
I.2
Figure 2. Scatchard plots of estrogen, R5020, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and dexamethasone binding to MCF-7, Cytosol (1.83 mg/ml protein) binding of 5 x lo-l1M to 8 x 10"9M estradiol-17$-5H; cytosol binding of 8 x lo-1OM to 2.5 x lo-8M dexamethasone-3H assayed by the dextran coated charcoal method. C tosol (1.22 mg/ml protein) binding of 4 x lo-llM to 10m8M R5020-?!I H; cytosol (2.62 mg/ml protein) binding of 5 x 10-llM to 8 x 10m9M dihydrotestosterone-5Hassayed by the protamine sulfate method. Nonspecific binding has been subtracted as indicated in Methods.
TABLE I Percent inhibition of estradiol-17&3H, R5020-3H, YKxDHT-~H and dexamethasone-3Hbinding in MCF-7 cytosols by unlabeled competitors
Competitor
Diethylstilbestrol R5020 Progesterone Dihydrotestosterone Dexamethasone
E2-3H 8S 4S
94 0 4 10 6
R5020-3H 8s 4s
-
14 94 90 55 5
5 86 79 35 7
SCXDHT-~H 8s 4S
5 82 78 93 0
-
Dex-3H 8S 4S
8 91 87 0 93
24 73 68 0 77
Cell cy$osols (3.45 to 7.50 mg/ml protein) were incubated with 4 x lo- M estradiol-17B-3H, 2 x 10V8M R5020-3H, 2 x lo-'M 5clDHT-3Hor 5 x lo-'M dexamethasone-3H. Parallel samples were preincubated with 100 fold excess unlabeled hormones as shown. Competition was determined from percent depression of the area under the peaks in sucrose density gradients. (-) indicates absence of 4S peak.
Estrogen Receptor. Only diethylstilbestrol (an estrogen which does not bind SBG) was able to compete for binding of estradiol-3H. The glucocorticoid, progestins, and androgen were ineffectual. Progesterone Receptor. Progesterone and R5020 completely suppressed R5020-3H binding. No effective competition was seen with the estrogen or glucocorticoid. Dihydrotestosterone,however, depressed the 8S binding of R5020 by more than 50%. Androgen Receptor. Unlabeled dihydrotestosterone,R5020, and progesterone inhibited binding of So dihydrotestosterone-3H. The estrogen and glucocorticoid were poor competitors. Glucocorticoid Receptor. Unlabeled dexamethasone, R5020, and progesterone inhibited binding of dexamethasone-3H. The estrogen and androgen were poor competitors.
S
793
TlBBlOIDDISCUSSION
We have androgens All
MCF-7 cells
receptor-bound
sucrose
90% of
binding
of
the binding
sedimented
plots
100-fold
a major of
the
criterion
were
binding,
confirming
the presence
of
were
agreement
these
steroids
in other
Our findings
of
and glucocorticoids known to have
provides
a mechanism
who have
shown that stimulate
repeatedly
demonstrated
two classes
Our data
makes the
competed
for
dexamethasone
of
for
findings
steroids
latter
glucocorticoid failed
(17,22),
to
of
operate
possibility binding, suppress
reported
agents bind
androgen
with
the
binding
androgen
et al --
That
has been
a single
reverse of
(Zl),
in the
has even been proposed
unlikely.
are
receptor
androgens
glucocorticoids
through
for
androgens
B-glucuronidase.
and it
high
of Mowszowicz
can synergize
binding
of
progestins,
and many progestins
an androgen-inducible
can compete
nonspecific
Progestational
for
increasing
19).
between
the
progestins
of
binder
(18,
specificity.
with
those
were
indicating
cytosol
with
progestins
to explain
progestins
these
of
of
hormone,
receptor
subtraction
surprising.
Competition
of
and cells
effects,
8s region
cases
of
a principal
cross-competition
androgenic
(20) .
to
tissues
are not
receptor
kidney
in good
after
receptor.
unlabeled
in all
concentrations
The Kd’s
progestins,
45 components
excess
hormone
affinity.
in the
interaction
linear
for
to an estrogen
was abolished
was saturable,
The Scatchard
receptors
R5020 and dexamethasone,
In the presence
seen.
contain
in addition
hormones
with
gradients;
more than that
that
and glucocorticoids
four
also
found
receptor
Although was not
R5020.
that (22).
progestins true,
since
794
S
TPlEOXDI
We had predicted that progesterone receptors would be present in this cell line, since it was derived from an ER+, endocrine responsive tumor. That it also contained receptors for androgens and glucocorticoidswas fortuitous. To our knowledge, the finding of four classes of steroid receptors in one tissue is unique.
It means
that the MCF-7 line should prove to be extraordinarily useful in studying not only mechanisms of tumor endocrine response, but also the complex interrelationshipsbetween the binding and biological actions of these four steroids.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Doctor J.-P. Raynaud for providing R5020. This work has been aided by the USPHS CA-11378, CB-23862, the American Cancer Society BC-23D, and the Robert A. Welch Foundation.
REFERENCES 1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
McGuire, W.L., Pearson, O.H. and Segaloff, A. In ESTROGEN RECEPTOR IN HDMAN BREAST CANCER (W.L. McGuire, P.P. Carbone and E.P. Vollmer, eds.). Raven Press, New York, p. 17 (1975). Horwitz, K.B. and McGuire, W.L. STEROIDS 25, 497 (1975). Horwitz, K.B., McGuire, W.L., Pearson, 0-H. and Segaloff, A. SCIENCE 189, 726 (1975). Soule, H.D., Vazquez, J., Long, A., Albert, S. and Brennan, M. J. NATL. CANCER INST. 51, 1409 (1973). Brooks, S.C., Locke, E.R. and Soule, H.D. J. BIOL. CHEM. 248, 6251 (1973). Poortman, J., Prenen, J.A.C., Schwarz, F., Thijssen, J.H.H. J. CLIN. ENDO. AND METAB. 40, 373 (1975). Gardner, D.G. and Wittliff, J.L. BIOCHIM. ET BIOPHYS. ACTA 320, 617 (1973). Faber, L.E., Sandmann, M.L. and Stavely, H.E. FED. PROC. 22, 229 (1973). Layne, E. In METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, Vol. III (S.P. Colowick and N.O. Kasan, eds.) pp. 447-454 Academic Press, N.Y. (1957). Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N-J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. J. BIOL. CHEM. 193, 265 (1951). Rice, R.H. and Means, G.E. J. BIOL. CHEM. 246, 831 (1971).
12. Bray, G.A. ANAL. BIOCHEM. 1, 279 (1960), 13. McGuire, W.L. and De La Garza, M, J. CLIN. ENDO. AND MBTAB. 37, 986 (1973). 14. Scatchard, G. ANN. N.Y. ACAD. SCI. 51, 660 (1949). 15. Chamness, G.C., Huff, K. and McGuire, W.L. STEROIDS 25, 627 (1975). 16. Philibert, D. and Raynaud, J.-P. ENDOCRINOLOGY 94, 627 (1974). 17. Rousseau, G.G., Baxter, J.D. and Tomkins, G.M. J. MOL. BIOL. 67, 99 (1972). King, R.J.B. and Mainwaring, W.I.P. In STEROID-CELL INTERACTIONS. 18. University Park Press, Baltimore (197q. 19. Shyamala, G. BIOCHEMISTRY 12, 3085 (1973). 20. Bullock, L.P., Barthe, P.L., Mowszowicz, I., Orth, D.N., and Bardin, C.W. ENDOCRINOLOGY 97, 189 (1975). 21. Mowszowicz, I., Bieber, D.E., Chung, K.W. Bullock, L.P. and Bardin, W.L. ENDOCRINOLOGY 95, 1589 (1974). 22. Wittliff, J.L. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY 1, 109 (1974).