MEDICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. November 8, 1841.

MEDICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. November 8, 1841.

246 but in which asthma had existed for many symptoms, which he considered were indiyears, httbad found extensive emphysema of cative of the presence ...

370KB Sizes 0 Downloads 43 Views

246 but in which asthma had existed for many symptoms, which he considered were indiyears, httbad found extensive emphysema of cative of the presence of tubercles in the the lungs, many of the air-cells on the surface lungs. Among the most prominent of these being as large as pigeons’ eggs. Dr. Samuel symptoms were atrophy, night-sweats, haeJohnson’s lungs were in the like condition. moptysis, or dulnsss on percussion over part He thought the sudden death in Mr. Dunn’s of the chest, and a mucous rale. Unfortucase was more likely to be referrible to the nately, the physical signs were not detailed flabby state of the heart, and the exertion of with sufficient minuteness to enable any one present to decide that the case was really going up and down stairs. Mr. SNOw said, that the emphysema would one of phthisis ; its value was, therefore, interfere withl respiration, by diminishing the much diminished. Whatever the real disavailable part of the lungs ; and an attack ease was, however, a cure was effected by of bronchitis by the thickening of the mucous counter-irritation, followed by a seton in the membrane, and by the mucus thrown out, side, the internal use of hyoscyamus bellawould still further impede respiration and donna, prussic acid, and creosote. Some discussion followed on several the passage of blood through the lungs. The functions of the brain’often became disturbed, points connected with pulmonary consumpwhen the circulation through the lungs was tion, in which Mr. Davies, Mr. Johnson, impeded by severe bronchitis, or any other Mr. Elliott, the President, and others, took cause ; and the exertion of going up stairs part. might hasten the end of this patient, which was probably approaching. He did not think the enlarged gland could make pres- MEDICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. sure enough on the bronchus to cause the emNovember 8, 1841. physema, since there was no firm resistance from bone, or anything else, at that part ; but ’ Dr. CLUTTERBUCK, President. the enlarged gland might irritate the nerves, so as to provoke the asthmatic cough, which OF THE SOUNDS HEART.—LOCAL NERVOUS was sufficient cause for the emphysema. AFFECTIONS. - THE HAND-DROP. - USE OF Mr. HARVEY inquired, whether in Mr. BLISTERS AND STRYCHNINE. Dunn’s case there was a stridulousness in the minutes were read, which had AFTER the breathing? In Dr. Lee’s cases, in which there was pressure in the neighbourhood ofreference to a case of diseased heart, Mr. HIRD said, that he would mention the air-passages, from a tumour, stridulous some facts detailed by Cruveilhier, and just was a prominent respiration symptom. Mr. DUNN said convulsive respiration was published, relating to the heart’s sounds and its action. The author in question derived a symptom in his case. Dr. BIRD considered the cases of Dr. his observations from a man in whom the chest covering the heart were Ilugh Ley quite distinct from the one underwalls of the wanting. M. Cruveilhier found that there discussion. Mr. STREETER believed that in some of thewas no interval between the systole and diaearlier cases recorded by Dr. Lee, the en- stole, as generally supposed, but that there a constant contraction and dilatation of larged glands had been found in situations aswas He also found that the sound, the organ. low as they were in Mr. Dunn’s case ; he which was supposed to depend upon the was inclined, however, to the opinion that this case was one of pure syncope, occurring percussion of the apex of the heart against in a patient with a flabby heart, and having the ribs, was, in fact, the result of a peculiar muscular structure of the an impediment to the circulation through the twisting of the itself heart at its apex. He thought, morelungs. When the lungs were diseased, synthat the heart’s sounds were not caused cope was much more likely to become fatal over, by its systole or diastole, as supposed by than when these organs were sound. Mr. ERICHSEN inquired if the pressure ex- some ; or by the tricuspid or mitral valves, as erted on the vagus nerve by the tumour in imagined by others ; but were solely dependthis case might not, by its long continuance, ent on the sigmoid valves. so have lessened the nervous influence conPECULIAR NERVOUS AFFECTION OF THE veyed to the lungs, as to render it more liable FORE-FINGER. to the causes of emphysema, which was prothis Dr. RISDON BENNETT called the attention induced in case and bronchitis bably by of the society to a singular kind of local heart disease ? nervous affection of the fore-finger of the right hand, which interfered with the action of CASE OF CONSUMPTION (?) CURED. writing. Hehad seen three cases of the Dr. JAMES THOMSON read a paper before kind, all occurring in persons more or less of the society, in which he made some prelimi- studious habits. In one of these cases, the nary remarks on the usual symptoms of gentleman was a hard student, and had been phthisis pulmonalis, and then proceeded to employed very much in writing. About detail the case of a ladv who had a varietv oftwenty years ago, he found himself one day,

247

suddenly, unable to write, for the moment he tion. He believed the affection would have attempted to grasp the pen in the usual posi- been more general, had its cause been situation for writing, the fore-finger was suddenly ted in the brain or spinal marrow. He difextended with a violent convulsive action, fered from Mr. Dendy, in supposing there and the pen thrown to a considerable dis- was a want of antagonising power in the Further attempts at retaining the flexor muscles of the finger, because in these tance. pen were equally fruitless, as was also an cases the power exerted was not continuous, endeavour to write with the pen placed in a but was merely a convulsive action. different position between the fore and middle Dr. THEOPHILus THOMSON had seen a case fingers. He was eventually under the neces- similar to those described by Dr. Bennett. sity of writing with his left hand, which he In this instance the affected person was a The nervous affection in the right solicitor, and the spasmodic or rather quivernow did. hand fore-finger still continues, but is called ing action was confined to the muscles of the into action only when he attempts to write. thumb, and came on when he attempted to In another case, the gentleman was not par- hold a pen. His brain had been overworked ticularly studious, but was subjected to the by business, as well as his thumb by writing.

I

’annoyance : in him the affection has He recommended rest for both, under which existed for several years. Now in neither of a recovery soon took place. these cases did the complaint appear to deDr. JOHNSON should refer the local nerpend upon any derangement of the general vous affection, in some of these cases, to system, or of the nervous system, but ap- disorder of the digestive organs : they could peared to be a local affection depending upon only be explained on the doctrine of sympaexcito-motory causes, and was called into thy, or what had been lately called the action the moment the point of the finger in excito-motory system. It was no proof that the position for writing touched the paper. his view of the case was incorrect, because Neither of these gentlemen were thin, and the effect had been so permanent. We knew their fingers did not want flesh. that in the human body the effect often reMr. DENDY had met with several cases of mained when its cause was removed: but complete numbness or paralysis of the index who was to say that there was not a permafinger in gentlemen much accustomed to but hidden, cause of irritation existing writing. In these cases there was much in these cases. attenuation, and the extremities of the nerves Mr. PROCTOR still contended that the oriat the point of the finger were not sufficiently covered. He had attributed the phenomena ginal cause was in the brain. Indigestion exhibited in these cases to paralysis, result- itself usually depended on an overworked ing from long-continued pressure upon the ’ brain, or else how did rest of the brain cure nerves ; and the consequent loss of antago- indigestion ? nising power in the exterior muscles, by Mr. PILCHER believed the affection in Dr. Bennett’s case to be local, and dependent which the finger was thrown up. Dr. BENNETT remarked, that in his cases upon excito-motory causes. The same kind there was nothing like paralysis, in the usual of action would occur in other muscles when the patient was otherwise in excellent health. sense of that word. Mr. PROCTOR knew nothing of the excito- He should not look to the brain as the origin motory system, as it was called; he should of the mischief in this case, but he believed look further than the extremity of the finger, that the irritation was conveyed to and from in such cases as these, for the cause. The the spine ; or, what was much the same, to spinal marrow or the brain, he believed, was and from the ganglion or the carpus. It was at fault : an overworked brain, he consi- a similar condition of the muscles of the in the dered, would produce a local affection of this finger, as that which was observed kind ; it was of the nature of the movements muscles of the fore-arm in the 11 hand-drop" in chorea. He would ask those who ques- of paiuters, in which there was a loss of tioned his views, how they explained those balance between the extensor and flexor local convulsive actions of children, confined muscles, and which affection he believed to He had found that these as they were to the thumbs, and indicating, be entirely local. cases of hand-drop were always confined to as they did, mischief in the brain. Mr. T. V. ELLIOTT inquired whether the the right hand. If the phenomenon was decases in question bore any analogy to those pendent on the absorption of lead, why involuntary local actions of the muscles of should it affect one hand only ? In a case of the face, which were frequently dependent this kind which had come under his care two upon irritation in the prima via-as worms, years since, he had blistered the back part in the case of children-and were removed of the arm, and used strychnine internally. The practice was empirical, but the man got by a purgative? Mr. HAKcocK believed the cause of Dr. well. Whether from refraining from work, Bennett’s case should be sought for at the or from the remedies, he could not say. He extremity of the nerve, and not at its origin: had since had the same patient under treathe therefore agreed with Dr. Bennett in ment for the same affection. He had noticed referring the phenomena to the reflex func- on both occasions that the strychnine pro. same

nent,

248

duced

a very entire surface.

distressing eruption

over

JURISPRUDENCE, GLASGOW.ŅA correspondent in the above city has forwarded to us the following paragraph for publicaMEDICAL

the

,

Mr. CRisP considered that in Dr. Bennett’s the affection was local. He knew tion :— little of nervous pathology, but he considered The

cases

that it might be regulatecl by the laws as were observed in morbid conditions of other structures ; as, for instance, the arteries. These local spasmodic affections had their origin, he thought, in the nerve supplying the muscles of the part, and not in the brain or spinal marrow. He related a case of twisting of the neck, which had suddenly come on in a painter. The head was permanently drawn on one side. After trying various remedies in vain, he (Mr. Crisp) divided the sterno-mastoid muscle with partial, but not complete, curative effect; the trapezius, being supplied by the same nerve, still acting. Under the use of local applications, however, the cure was made complete. He believed tic-douloureux was not so frequently dependent for its cause on the stomach or the brain, as was generally supposed, but was, in fact, a local

it

likely

same

disease. Dr. JoHNSON

thought

the "

Queen has been pleased to appoint Harry Rainy, Professor of Medical Jurisprudence in the University of Glasgow. This is the first appointment of a professor in Scotland by the Conservative Government, and will give general satisfaction. Dr. Rainy is not only one of the most enlightened and philosophic physicians who ever practised in this city, but he is also an excellent chemist, and, what is of prime importance in a professor, his abilities as a teacher are of the highest order, as have been amply proved by his great and deserved popularity in the university, while lecturer on the institutes and the practice of medicine. And we may add, that no public instructor ever performed his duties with a higher or more honest sense of responsibility. Dr. Hannay, Dr. Laurie,

hand-drop’’

frequently dependent upon the imbibition of lead, but the muscles would also be much affected by over-work. In support of his opinion regarding the imbibition of lead, he related the case of a medical student, in whom there was dropping of both hands; a consequence of having taken ten grains of superacetate of lead, for three months, for an

was

obstinate

laboured.

by

an

diarrhoea under which he had The medicine had been ordered

Edinburgh practitioner.

Regarding

the local affections of nerves in which the brain was not implicated, we all knew these could occur : look, for instance, at the facial paralysis which had been produced by a stream of cold air having been applied to the cheek. Dr. THOMSON had seen strychnia sprinkled over a blistered surface in these local nervous affections of the greatest benefit. This practice had been pursued for some years in the Bath General Hospital.

MR. WANSBROUGH’S RECIPE FOR

GOUT,

&c.

To the EditO1’ of THE LANCET. SiR,ŅI shall feel particularly obliged to those of my professional brethren, amounting to nearly three hundred, to whom I have forwarded my" recipe" for gout and rheumatism, if they will favour me with the results of their experience of the remedy. I am, Sir, your obedient servant,

WANSBROUGU. T. W. WANSBROUGH.

King’ê-road1 Chelsea, Now. 1 1841.

Dr.

Mr.

Macgregor,

Mr. Allan

Burns, and

Dr.

Henry Cleland, of this city, and Dr. Handyside, of Edinburgh, were, we understand, also candidates for the chair. It is rumoured thatchairs of pathology and comparative aiiatomy are likely to be endowed by the Crown in the course of next year.

TO CORRESPONDENTS. - Mr. J. B. Harrison.-Neither the circumstance of the party being a graduate, nor that of his being a member of the college, will aid him one step towards practising legally as an apothecary. But without compounding, dispensing, and charging for medicines, lie may prescribe for any disease without offending against the law, saving by the guilt of malapraxis. Beta.-The questions and the answers, and the probable rejoinders and remarks, would require more space than, we can foresee, we should be able to afford them, and therefore we withhold our correspondent’s letter. The letter of L. (of T.) has been received; but why propose to publish the facts under an anonymous signature ? We are unable to find room for the report of the University ftIetlicllZ Society this week: it shall appear in our next. ERRATUM.ŅWe have to apologise to our respected and valued correspondent A LooKER-ON" for the omission of afew verbal alterations in his letter of this week, p. 229, which he desired to have made. The most prominent error occurs in page 230, line 4], where we will thank the reader to insert with his pen the word lost, before the words ‘c

a

morat agent."