Nuclear Data Sheets 86, 449 (1999) Article No. ndsh.1999.0006
Nuclear Data Sheets for
170 Pt *
CORAL M. BAGLIN Nuclear Science Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (Received January 22, 1999; Revised February 22, 1999) Abstract: Nuclear structure data pertaining to ENSDF data file.
This evaluation of
170Pt
have been compiled and evaluated, and incorporated into the
170Pt
supersedes the previous publication (Coral M. Baglin,
Nuclear Data Sheets 77, 125 (1996) (literature cutoff date October 1995)), and includes literature available by 17 February 1999. The newly incorporated references are: 98Se20, 98Ki20, 97Ju04, 97Uu01, 96Bi07 and 95Au04. Three new data sets have been added, as follows:
174Hg
α decay,
171Au
p d e c a y ( 1 . 0 2 m s ) , ( H I , x nγ ) .
Cutoff Date: Data received by 17 February 1999 have been evaluated. General Policies and Organization of Material: See the January issue of Nuclear Data Sheets. Acknowledgments: The evaluator thanks the reviewer of this nuclide for constructive comments.
* Research sponsored by the Nuclear Physics Division of the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE–AC03–76SF00098. 0090–3752/99 $30.00 Copyright 1999 by Academic Press. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
449
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS
Ind ex for Nuclide 170Pt
Data Type Adopted Levels, Gammas 174Hg
α Decay
171Au
p Decay (1.02 ms)
(HI,xnγ)
Page 451 452 452 452
450
170Pt
17 0 P t – 1 92 78
17 0 P t – 1 92 78
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS
Ad op te d L e ve ls, Gammas S(n)=11890 SY; S(p)=1760 SY; Q(α)=6704 6
95Au04.
S(n), S(p): uncertainty is 330, 140, respectively (95Au04). S(n)=12570 syst, ∆S(n)=330, and S(p)=2440 syst, ∆S(p)=140, from adjustment based on experimental data (93Au05). 170Pt
L evels
Cross Reference (XREF) Flags A
174Hg
α Decay
B
171Au
p Decay (1.02 ms)
C (HI,xnγ) Jπ†
E(level)‡ 0 . 0§
XREF
0+
T1/2
ABC
1 3 . 8 ms
Comments 5
%α=98 CA. T1/2: weighted average of 14.7 ms 5 (96Bi07) and 13.5 ms 3 (98Ki20). Other T1/2: 6 ms +5–2 from α(t) measurement (81Ho10); 15 ms +16–6 (97Uu01).
%α: gross β decay theory calculations predict partial β halflife to be 0.38 s ( 9 7 M o 2 5 ) o r ≈ 2 s ( 7 3 T a 3 0 ) , i m p l y i n g %ε + % β + = 3 . 9 o r ≈ 0 . 7 , r e s p e c t i v e l y ; b a s e d o n t h i s , t h e e v a l u a t o r s u g g e s t s %α = 9 8 2 . α d e c a y o f
170Pt
has been observed
( 8 1 H o 1 0 , 8 2 E n 0 3 , 9 6 B i 0 7 ) , b u t %α h a s n o t b e e n m e a s u r e d . 508 . 9§ 10
( 2+ )
C
1171 . 2§ 15 1910 . 7§ 18 2636 . 6? § 20
( 4+ )
C
†
( 6+ )
C
( 8+ )
C
Jπ: possible extension of g.s. band.
F r o m ( H I , x nγ ) . T h e t h r e e s t r o n g e s t g a m m a s f o r m a c a s c a d e o f s t r e t c h e d Q t r a n s i t i o n s , a n d t h e e n e r g y o f t h e s t r o n g e s t a g r e e s closely with that expected for the first 2+ state (based on the energy systematics for first excited states of even–A Pt isotopes from
172Pt
to
190Pt
(98Se20)). 98Ki20, therefore, assign the three strongest gammas to the g.s. band of
‡
B a s e d o n Eγ , a s s i g n i n g 1 k e V u n c e r t a i n t y t o a l l Eγ d a t a .
§
g.s. band (98Ki20).
γ( 1 7 0 Pt)
E(level)
Eγ†
Iγ
Mult.‡
508 . 9
508 . 9
100
Q
1171 . 2
662 . 3
100
Q
1910 . 7
739 . 5
100
Q
2636 . 6?
725 . 9§
100
†
F r o m ( H I , x nγ ) ; u n c e r t a i n t y n o t s t a t e d b y a u t h o r s .
‡
F r o m I γ ( 1 5 7 . 6 ° ) / I γ ( 7 9 ° a n d 1 0 1 ° ) i n ( H I , x nγ ) ; v a l u e i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h a t e x p e c t e d f o r s t r e t c h e d Q t r a n s i t i o n .
§
Placement of transition in the level scheme is uncertain.
(A) g.s. band (98Ki20). (8+)
2636.6
(6+)
1910.7
(4+)
1171.2
(2+)
508.9
0+
0.0 17 0 Pt 92 78
451
170Pt.
17 0 P t – 2 92 78
17 0 P t – 2 92 78
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS
174Hg
97Uu01: produced
174Hg
parent using
144Sm(36Ar,6n)
α De cay
9 7 Uu0 1
reaction at E(36Ar)=180–230 MeV; 88.6%
144Sm
target; gas–filled
r e c o i l s e p a r a t o r w i t h P I P S d e t e c t o r i n f o c a l p l a n e ( F W H M = 2 7 k e V a t 6 M e V ) ; o b s e r v e d c o r r e l a t e d r e c o i l –α – α c h a i n s ; m e a s u r e d Eα , p a r e n t a n d d a u g h t e r T 1 / 2 . 170Pt
E(level) 0.0
L evels
Jπ 0+
α rad iations
Eα
E(level)
7069 11 †
0.0
Iα‡
HF†
100
1.0
r 0 = 1 . 5 4 7 , a s s u m i n g H F = 1 . 0 f o r 7 0 6 9α , T 1 / 2 ( 1 7 4 H g ) = 2 . 1 m s + 1 8 – 7 ( 9 7 U u 0 1 ) , Q (α ) ( 1 7 4 H g ) = 7 2 3 5 1 1 ( b a s e d o n Eα f r o m 9 7 U u 0 1 ) a n d
%α(174Hg)=99.6. ‡
For α intensity per 100 decays, multiply by 0.996.
171Au
97Da07: source produced using
96Ru(78Kr,p2n),
p De cay (1 .0 2 ms)
E=389 MeV. 170Pt
E(level) 0.0
9 7 Da0 7
L evels
Jπ 0+
P rotons
E(p) 1692 6
I(p)†
E(170Pt) 0.0
100
Comments This E(p), combined with 97Da07's limits on the energy of the
171Au
isomer (viz., 180 80) imply
S(p)(171Au p)=–1522 80, cf. –1510 syst adopted in 95Au04. †
For intensity per 100 decays, multiply by 1.00.
(H I,xn γ )
9 8 Ki 2 0
Others: 98Se20, 97Ju04. This data set includes
112Sn(63Cu,p4nγ), 112Sn(60Ni,2nγ), 96Mo(78Kr,3nγ)
and
96Ru(78Kr,2p2nγ).
98Ki20: 112Sn(63Cu,p4nγ),
E=338 MeV;
112Sn(60Ni,2nγ),
E=266 MeV; 93.2%
112Sn
target; gas–filled recoil separator, Si strip
d e t e c t o r i n f o c a l p l a n e ; J U R O S P H E R E γ d e t e c t o r a r r a y ( 1 7 C o m p t o n – s u p p r e s s e d G e d e t e c t o r s ) ; m e a s u r e d Eγ , I γ f r o m recoil–gated α–tagged γ spectrum, γγ coin. 98Se20: 96Mo(78Kr,3nγ),
E(78Kr)=345 MeV, enriched
96Mo
target;
96Ru(78Kr,2p2nγ),
E(78Kr)=385 MeV, enriched
96Ru
target;
recoil α–decay tagging method; 10 Compton–suppressed HPGe detector array, recoil fragment mass analyzer with d o u b l e – s i d e d S i s t r i p d e t e c t o r b e h i n d f o c a l p l a n e ; m e a s u r e d Eγ , E α . 97Ju04: 112Sn(63Cu,p4nγ),
E=338 MeV; gas–filled recoil separator, Si strip detector in focal plane; JUROSPHERE γ detector
array (20 Compton–suppressed Ge detectors); measured recoil–gated α–tagged γ spectrum.
452
17 0 P t – 3 92 78
(HI,xn γ )
9 8 Ki 2 0 (conti nue d) 170Pt
E(level)†
17 0 P t – 3 92 78
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS
L evels
Jπ‡
0 . 0§
0+
508 . 9§ 1171 . 2§
2+
1910 . 7§
6+
2636 . 6? §
( 8+ )
4+
†
B a s e d o n Eγ .
‡
From 98Ki20. The three strongest gammas form a cascade of stretched Q transitions, and the energy of the strongest agrees closely with that expected for the first 2+ state (based on the energy systematics for first excited states of even–A Pt isotopes from
§
172Pt
to
190Pt
(98Se20)). 98Ki20, therefore, assign the three strongest gammas to the g.s. band of
170Pt.
g.s. band (98Ki20).
γ( 1 7 0 Pt)
Eㆠx213
.5
x385
.0
508 . 9
E(level)
Iγ†
Mult.‡
Comments
16 1 26 2 508 . 9
100 5
Q
Iγ(157.6°)/Iγ(79° and 101°)=1.06 12 (98Ki20). Other Eγ: 510 keV (97Ju04), 508 keV (98Se20); authors do not state the uncertainty.
x524
.0
32 3
x536
.4
21 4
x545
.0
14 4
x572
.5
13 3
x588
.3
19 3
x600
.5
26 6
662 . 3
1171 . 2
86 6
725 . 9§
2636 . 6?
30 3
739 . 5
1910 . 7
49 7
Q
Iγ(157.6°)/Iγ(79° and 101°)=1.20 14 (98Ki20).
Q
Iγ(157.6°)/Iγ(79° and 101°)=0.88 17 (98Ki20).
†
From 98Ki20. Energy uncertainty not stated by authors.
‡
From Iγ(157.6°)/Iγ(79° and 101°) (98Ki20); consistent with value expected for stretched Q transition. Placement of transition in the level scheme is uncertain. γ ray not placed in level scheme. Level Scheme
2+
49 Q
10
Q
0
86
Q 2.3
8.9
4+
50
6+
9.5
(8+)
72
5.9
30
I n t e n s i t i e s : r e l a t i v e Iγ
73
x
66
§
2636.6 1910.7 1171.2 508.9
0+
0.0 1 7 0 Pt 92 78
453
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS
REFERENCES FOR
170P t
7 3Ta 3 0
K.Takahashi, M.Yamada, T.Kondoh – At.Data Nucl.Data Tables 12, 101 (1973)
8 1Ho 1 0
S.Hofmann, G.Munzenberg, F.Hessberger, W.Reisdorf, P.Armbruster, B.Thuma – Z.Phys. A299, 281 (1981)
8 2 En 0 3
H.A.Enge, M.Salomaa, A.Sperduto, J.Ball, W.Schier, A.Graue, A.Graue – Phys.Rev. C25, 1830 (1982)
9 3 Au 0 5
G.Audi, A.H.Wapstra – Nucl.Phys. A565, 1 (1993)
9 5 Au 0 4
G.Audi, A.H.Wapstra – Nucl.Phys. A595, 409 (1995)
9 6B i 0 7
C.R.Bingham, K.S.Toth, J.C.Batchelder, D.J.Blumenthal, L.T.Brown, B.C.Busse, L.F.Conticchio, C.N.Davids, T.Davinson,
9 7Da 0 7
C.N.Davids, P.J.Woods, J.C.Batchelder, C.R.Bingham, D.J.Blumenthal, L.T.Brown, B.C.Busse, L.F.Conticchio,
D.J.Henderson, R.J.Irvine, D.Seweryniak, W.B.Walters, P.J.Woods, B.E.Zimmerman – Phys.Rev. C54, R20 (1996) T.Davinson, S.J.Freeman, D.J.Henderson, R.J.Irvine, R.D.Page, H.T.Penttila, D.Seweryniak, K.S.Toth, W.B.Walters, B.E.Zimmerman – Phys.Rev. C55, 2255 (1997) 97Ju04
R.Julin, K.Helariutta, P.Jones, S.Juutinen, H.Kankaanpaa, P.Kuusiniemi, M.Leino, M.Muikku, A.Savelius, W.Trzaska, J.Uusitalo, R.G.Allatt, P.A.Butler, J.F.C.Cocks, P.T.Greenlees, R.D.Page, J.Simpson, R.Lemmon – Acta Phys.Hung.N.S. 6, 169 (1997)
9 7Mo 2 5
P.Moller, J.R.Nix, K.–L.Kratz – At.Data Nucl.Data Tables 66, 131 (1997)
9 7Uu 0 1
J.Uusitalo, M.Leino, R.G.Allatt, T.Enqvist, K.Eskola, P.T.Greenlees, S.Hurskanen, A.Keenan, H.Kettunen,
9 8K i 2 0
S.L.King, J.Simpson, R.D.Page, N.Amzal, T.Back, B.Cederwall, J.F.C.Cocks, D.M.Cullen, P.T.Greenlees, M.K.Harder,
P.Kuusiniemi, R.D.Page, W.H.Trzaska – Z.Phys. A358, 375 (1997) K.Helariutta, P.Jones, R.Julin, S.Juutinen, H.Kankaanpaa, A.Keenan, H.Kettunen, P.Kuusiniemi, M.Leino, R.Lemmon, M.Muikku, A.Savelius, J.Uusitalo, P.Van Isacker – Phys.Lett. 443B, 82 (1998) 98Se 20
D.Seweryniak, D.Ackermann, H.Amro, L.T.Brown, M.P.Carpenter, L.Conticchio, C.N.Davids, S.M.Fischer, G.Hackman, S.Hamada, D.J.Henderson, R.V.F.Janssens, D.Nisius, P.Reiter, W.B.Walters, P.J.Woods – Phys.Rev. C58, 2710 (1998)
454