P033 Metabolic risk factors and target organ damage in white coat hypertensives, essential hypertensives and normotensives

A

1

]

1

N 9 4 PH

2

9

-

8

A

A-

P

P A T H C A N A G F B N M U H U M S t p c ,F G ( l p , ( L s ( 3 y A P c t w h ( a e p l a M a r a a6 p t t c t s w b T r b a a t f

METABOLIC

O

RISK FACTORS

D

W H O

H U r d

c f

s

w w d p a T e p

t

d

W

A C

m a

a

c a

t

t

d

o t

A

a

n E

a (

B

s

e

w f

a

w

t

f m

t w

w

f

9

9

2

2

5

3

9

9

9

2

2

2

5

9

OV

POSTERS: R EOpidemiology I R 219A L L

0

0

3

ON M A TH I E YO S PG R E A TR Yoa u S pc e C LC MC N P h C I Ih So o m m O im L U a c d d Y o T a o t s w t i t en b ta v a a he i y n m e a i y i w r m r ir n a t i t g o a ho oo o e dn f r h o ty a pA a w ba ohn t a da a i t W C aa t Eurcpaan cantrae participating hS o o d H d iC o Tt o o n t ra m C aD a rS i a v Mo c s w ah a s t o wa p a e uaa 2 i e t t u w 1 c ea 1 d d y c w i 1 c ab o ua n n t c o s w c t k ai w a F t rr o ha e m e i i ca y h u o o n a w m s w 3 c p o s ta a e c ca i t ii cs a ( y b a t t a hd A aq eo m u ei n a t da C a cm w i ih i u Sn ch i n n s f t f ea i * a ma d i o m e nn h r sd nc d d e A a m uq opw w ui p ga la r w a t s d c e mt c fi t t E o ne h i ru n s c i d w o p en c nh e o h c t ui e t l er i m i n g H r B c d cn e ald ( aa l u n t T i o a h o h m ( i y p e rp s p x h e l l o i B B p P p r o fl W aa n d g dhj nn a o r ( k r a i v O ae w a dwc n h m Ra i Ua o w~ i i n ah o a f n a ~ t N o ~ 8 ’ a & s C O cC R ’ - W f (

ML L C

1

I R M

E S

P

c@rola

~

E

We o b

T a d

p

*

a s N

r

d 0

e t

t ah

r

(

W c

a

t

m

i

t

W

s

N l . ~ O 3 .o ( ~ r H 6 ( I >2 . N H l . f O f ( .1 r < H T t m i 1 N i M n H w H m.t m o r e ow h aa w a T c r o ah o b ro rp r t a~ m h - w yi a p r p s multiplkativa affectcmriskofiachasrnic strokeeaaoMad ar t o h withmigrdrsa.Pssticulariy carefulmntrdof BPis indicated forsuch o

b r

ag

a t

. &H f l WB 2 8~ a ( If I g r h a i r 9 i a a w i x r geu n na

(o.&

b

p

d

a

E organ

n

Wnsan. K

Migreina, hypertension, eboke

e KeyWords:

W w m

v

c

h

m

y

l

i

P

P

y e

0

0

3

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS ANDBLOOD PRESSURE; OVERVIEW HH N e & OFPUBLISHED DATA:1966-1998.H C

B P A S R A L LNE ET S EO I H S nCI ( 1 u g RE O ST E T SV o D U mF i w n C Lo n M S iL u o U o e v c l o W a U ~d n ht rn NMP i ai aa odC ~ d . K iwo mcr g o t e o d o s pd. ap T a ot e w t a w e o t a h ch i h i oe a u - a a t i ca o d h n so w t ieed v t ae t h a en a h s ( a B e a tm i S a w S d ai ai h a f ‘ T E a noc te tf s r O a t eSura a b aWt A r fr f h eo p ya f 8 ap S i cy k a t SB l C a r e tm h a o 4 tC r 0Se ues a o m t c vn nt So v ram a Ct eO% i t rirBt a H ttwi S tc i e t o a x aA n ob sa r p oa @a c C e uv r li & aE a i a aa t d(m a m (eae i t u n edauo n c a h rvki 9 w o 8 s ( f d ot 1 fe u w uo n v r n 1 dT Sd w a t5a m re oa s e oi aap e l a& o a 9 uahoh f 0H m a p o 7 a r ( y a e W a a i n a t i c d e 1 ei c i v f hM d e 1 m i el E lon9 r n Dp dt i 8 i r L n f e o g & 1I ai ei 9nm , n T cuar i wh e 3 m sa aa pl i s w w I i 6 r ag lB m an iaa p va t a i a i hn c u 1 m a o r a ab a w e c it bnc r c fr a u t O 8 d K i ea a b 1s en 0 c i li v a m ‘ c di S wa e M h snmv EBo s at i o Sb r v c ep gfP wi l a a m a hd a a t a’ ’ t B v a p a a t m roat I 2 r e k e l s e i a a s T i g lt w o n mru m h b v a d i o d i e o e a i e i s r w e s s e l wn m eu tH e a c a h e r sv ns i t r t mt e O a mi e r vb h n BmI e r tg a c e w o s i wn r w a rv o t n e opt e W nnh i aa aae y n a aw s B v b 2 t 3y m t Sa rs a t m t i r( a f b o o St f vm ai n aieh w gH C e 9l h ff Ev W 9Ei a i w t oc u s o t d v c i a u s f i a Sn h tf ac c raia a u eei f e r e ab euk e nf dt r z m rt ti ad ai tr r a c rab ircE i differences in hypmtandm traatrmntratesappeared to bem unlkaiy I V Ek a a p e ba r wr t c wv e h e a os o t explanation fortheBESgradient in BP. MuchoftheBESfBP grdiant ~ E T e bt am: B l sa a a Tc et l wasecuwntad b bytheinverseeaacciatbn batwwnSESendBMI, q ( o a 3 eu w en a u Q m t lx r i u at os i ’ particularly inwornen andalcohol cwtaumption accounted fcfperiofthe r M a ( v fg b e r vr C aa a a id ak l i m L e t p v f i aa ei ya l h wce d 0 ( t ( n utc tar . 5 :na axit .i l0 r a d c e r eaaocietkm v a E i ho u c 3e0 S c c B e wa hr l I aw E 1 rap eW2 m f a ~ a te t a M l ( n u t uo m? .ts t a imo t cmi ho @ 1w D u c n ad e od b h eeSu i andB av na h i e r( yt t cl ws@ e! t c e c oS p g or a B B p Ei r Whi a 8 da W l o f w a e N na a y al i Ba o g av n n tp ii p levelswasrqmrtadmf!ecting, at leastin part,higherIavata of obesity, m o w w a e Q ~ e p Mo o p c ia e m a saltandalcoholintdceamongthoseof higherSES.Amongchitdrm, D d i m t j B : f da u v E b o a ei a a SESdiffamnces in BPwareusuallynottfabctadToreducetheSES b t W t l (e a h ( l h oo tv i ew Qi w og gradientin BP In the developed wor!d,a majorimpactwouldbe C b e r e a l s achieved bypreventing SESdffarancas in obesity.Futureraaaemh A j P um S Bt Pd D B shwldinvaatigata theSE3/obadty link,partfwlerly inwoman. W f l BA d o j u M 1.8 2.1 e a r- k n Q 3 1 1 p h y . a 2.81 2.0 Q 5 1 Qk h ~a BP’eware I t p o bwarinmanandwrrwnwiththe p uh l a v C l a a i f s d ec a t fj o e vun a signiikanl forSt f a r r a t w o al h h n a H t m b m mo M i d o f w md s h t n ea s Ch b a w k sr o s e o =wtjivtJafJn P

K

U

W

B

b

K

W

O B

s

m

n

te

e

i a

o

trw C

x